CORONA Boston University CREATES a new Covid strain that has an 80% kill rate — echoing dangerous experiments feared to have started pandemic

somewherepress

Has No Life - Lives on TB

Boston University CREATES a new Covid strain that has an 80% kill rate — echoing dangerous experiments feared to have started pandemic​

  • Researchers added Omicron's spike protein to the original Wuhan Covid strain
  • Omicron's spike is highly mutated which made it the most infectious variant ever
  • Eight in 10 mice infected with the lab-created strain died at Boston University lab
By CAITLIN TILLEY, HEALTH REPORTER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

PUBLISHED: 11:02 EDT, 17 October 2022 | UPDATED: 13:04 EDT, 17 October 2022

US researchers have developed a new lethal Covid strain in a laboratory – echoing the type of experiments many fear started the pandemic.

The mutant variant — which is a hybrid of Omicron and the original Wuhan virus — killed 80 percent of mice infected with it at Boston University.

When a similar group of rodents were exposed to the standard Omicron strain, however, they all survived and only experienced 'mild' symptoms.

ADVERTISEMENT

The scientists also infected human cells with the hybrid variant and found it was five times more infectious than Omicron.

This suggests the man-made virus might be the most contagious form yet.

It will no doubt surprise many Americans that such experiments continue to go on in the US despite concerns similar studies may have led to the global Covid outbreak.

Covid first began spreading from a wet market in Wuhan, China, about eight miles from a similar high-security virology laboratory that manipulated bat coronaviruses.

Chinese scientists were found to have wiped crucial databases and stifled independent investigations into the facility's links to the pandemic.

In the new research , which has not been peer-reviewed, a team of researchers from Boston and Florida extracted Omicron's spike protein ¿ the unique structure that binds to and invades human cells. It has always been present but it has become more evolved over time. Omicron has dozens of mutations in its spike protein that made it so infectious. Researchers attached Omicron's spike protein to the original wildtype strain that first emerged in Wuhan at the start of the pandemic. The researchers looked at how mice fared under the new hybrid strain compared to the original Omicron variant

+10
View gallery
In the new research , which has not been peer-reviewed, a team of researchers from Boston and Florida extracted Omicron's spike protein — the unique structure that binds to and invades human cells. It has always been present but it has become more evolved over time. Omicron has dozens of mutations in its spike protein that made it so infectious. Researchers attached Omicron's spike protein to the original wildtype strain that first emerged in Wuhan at the start of the pandemic. The researchers looked at how mice fared under the new
80 percent of mice died from the new man-made Covid strain, while none died from the milder Omicron variant alone, researchers at Boston University's National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories found
In the new research, which has not been peer-reviewed, a team of researchers from Boston and Florida extracted Omicron's spike protein — the unique structure that binds to and invades human cells.

It has always been present in the virus but has become more evolved over time. Omicron has dozens of mutations on its spike protein that made it so infectious.

Researchers attached Omicron's spike to the original wildtype strain that first emerged in Wuhan at the start of the pandemic.

The researchers looked at how mice fared against the new hybrid strain compared to the original Omicron variant.

Writing in the paper, they said: ‘In...mice, while Omicron causes mild, non-fatal infection, the Omicron S-carrying virus inflicts severe disease with a mortality rate of 80 percent.’

The researchers said it signaled that while the spike protein is responsible for infectivity, changes to other parts of its structure determine its deadliness.

The question of whether the global outbreak began with a spillover from wildlife sold at the market or leaked out of the Wuhan lab just eight miles across the Yangtze River has given rise to fierce debate about how to prevent the next pandemic. New studies point to a natural spillover at the Huanan wildlife market. Positive swab samples of floors, cages and counters also track the virus back to stalls in the southwestern corner of the market (bottom left), where animals with the potential to harbor Covid were sold for meat or fur at the time (bott

Covid latches onto human cells with its spike protein, and instructs produce copies of itself.

Scientists measured how many copies each variant caused the health cells to produce.

They found the hybrid strain produced five times more viral particles than the original Omicron.

The scientists admit the hybrid virus is unlikely to be as deadly in humans as it was in mice.

This is because the specific breed of lab mice used are very susceptible to severe Covid disease. Mice and humans also have very different immune responses to the virus.

The lab, at Boston University's National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories, is one of 13 biosafety level 4 labs in the US.

These are labs that are authorized to handle the most dangerous pathogens. There are also facilities in Texas, Atlanta and Manhattan, Kansas.

Experiments at these labs often involve tinkering with animal viruses to advance treatments and vaccines that could be used in a future outbreak.

Work on the live virus that causes Covid must be carried out at a BSL-3 or BSL-4 lab.

In BSL-3 labs, researchers do all experiments in a ‘biosafety cabinet’ — an enclosed, ventilated workspace for handling materials contaminated with pathogens.

The labs also have self-closing doors, sealed windows, floors and walls, and filtered ventilation systems.

In a BSL-4 lab, full-body, air-supplied pressure suits are worn and workers must change their clothing before entering and shower before leaving.

The lab is situated in a separate section of the building and has its own dedicated air supply.

The 'lab leak' origin theory for Covid was initially dismissed as conspiracy at the start of the pandemic in favour of a natural emergence.

But the hypothesis gained momentum following a series of revelations and cover-ups.

Crucial information about the earliest infected patients was wiped from the Wuhan lab's database in late 2019 and one of its staff vanished after coming down with a mysterious flu-like illness.

Have we learned nothing? 40 new biochemical labs that handle dangerous viruses are being built around the world​

The Coronavirus pandemic has prompted a global surge in laboratories that handle dangerous viruses — despite concerns Covid may have been the result of the risky experiments.
More than 40 facilities certified as biosafety level 3 (BSL-3) or BSL-4 have either been built or have gone into construction since 2020, predominantly across Asia.
Many countries believe they were caught flat-footed by Covid and want to get ahead of the next devastating outbreak by studying pathogens that pose a threat to humans.
Experiments at these labs often involve tinkering with animal viruses to advance treatments and vaccines that could be used in a future outbreak.
There are currently 63 BSL-4 labs, the highest level of security, across the globe. This is up from the 59 which were in operation or planned last year. Three-quarters are in urban areas. South America and Africa are some of the places lacking access to the labs

+10
View gallery
There are currently 63 BSL-4 labs, the highest level of security, across the globe. This is up from the 59 which were in operation or planned last year. Three-quarters are in urban areas. South America and Africa are some of the places lacking access to the labs
But there are widespread concerns that these experiments might actually raise the risk of pandemics — something some experts believe was the case with Covid.

The virus first began spreading from a wet market in Wuhan, about eight miles from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), a high security biolab that worked with dangerous bat coronaviruses.

Scientists there worked on some of Covid's closest relatives. They were also found to have wiped crucial databases and stifled independent investigations into the laboratory's links to the pandemic.

Professor Paul Hunter, an expert in infection diseases at the University of East Anglia in England, told DailyMail.com he was concerned about what all the new labs would be used for.

'The issue is what you’re going to be using [the labs] for,' he told this website. 'If they’re for diagnostic purposes, then you need them. But I don’t think every country needs a BSL-4.’

He added: ‘If they start having a dual purpose for research that has offensive military implications, that is the concern.’
Russia has set out its proposals for 15 of the maximum security labs and India is aiming for 18 BSL-3 and BSL-4 labs in total. The US is also adding a further highest level biosecurity lab to its existing 12.
 

Tristan

Has No Life - Lives on TB

Boston University CREATES a new Covid strain that has an 80% kill rate — echoing dangerous experiments feared to have started pandemic​

  • Researchers added Omicron's spike protein to the original Wuhan Covid strain
  • Omicron's spike is highly mutated which made it the most infectious variant ever
  • Eight in 10 mice infected with the lab-created strain died at Boston University lab
By CAITLIN TILLEY, HEALTH REPORTER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

PUBLISHED: 11:02 EDT, 17 October 2022 | UPDATED: 13:04 EDT, 17 October 2022

US researchers have developed a new lethal Covid strain in a laboratory – echoing the type of experiments many fear started the pandemic.

The mutant variant — which is a hybrid of Omicron and the original Wuhan virus — killed 80 percent of mice infected with it at Boston University.

When a similar group of rodents were exposed to the standard Omicron strain, however, they all survived and only experienced 'mild' symptoms.

ADVERTISEMENT

The scientists also infected human cells with the hybrid variant and found it was five times more infectious than Omicron.

This suggests the man-made virus might be the most contagious form yet.

It will no doubt surprise many Americans that such experiments continue to go on in the US despite concerns similar studies may have led to the global Covid outbreak.

Covid first began spreading from a wet market in Wuhan, China, about eight miles from a similar high-security virology laboratory that manipulated bat coronaviruses.

Chinese scientists were found to have wiped crucial databases and stifled independent investigations into the facility's links to the pandemic.

In the new research , which has not been peer-reviewed, a team of researchers from Boston and Florida extracted Omicron's spike protein ¿ the unique structure that binds to and invades human cells. It has always been present but it has become more evolved over time. Omicron has dozens of mutations in its spike protein that made it so infectious. Researchers attached Omicron's spike protein to the original wildtype strain that first emerged in Wuhan at the start of the pandemic. The researchers looked at how mice fared under the new hybrid strain compared to the original Omicron variant's spike protein ¿ the unique structure that binds to and invades human cells. It has always been present but it has become more evolved over time. Omicron has dozens of mutations in its spike protein that made it so infectious. Researchers attached Omicron's spike protein to the original wildtype strain that first emerged in Wuhan at the start of the pandemic. The researchers looked at how mice fared under the new hybrid strain compared to the original Omicron variant

+10
View gallery
In the new research , which has not been peer-reviewed, a team of researchers from Boston and Florida extracted Omicron's spike protein — the unique structure that binds to and invades human cells. It has always been present but it has become more evolved over time. Omicron has dozens of mutations in its spike protein that made it so infectious. Researchers attached Omicron's spike protein to the original wildtype strain that first emerged in Wuhan at the start of the pandemic. The researchers looked at how mice fared under the new
80 percent of mice died from the new man-made Covid strain, while none died from the milder Omicron variant alone, researchers at Boston University's National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories found
In the new research, which has not been peer-reviewed, a team of researchers from Boston and Florida extracted Omicron's spike protein — the unique structure that binds to and invades human cells.

It has always been present in the virus but has become more evolved over time. Omicron has dozens of mutations on its spike protein that made it so infectious.

Researchers attached Omicron's spike to the original wildtype strain that first emerged in Wuhan at the start of the pandemic.

The researchers looked at how mice fared against the new hybrid strain compared to the original Omicron variant.

Writing in the paper, they said: ‘In...mice, while Omicron causes mild, non-fatal infection, the Omicron S-carrying virus inflicts severe disease with a mortality rate of 80 percent.’

The researchers said it signaled that while the spike protein is responsible for infectivity, changes to other parts of its structure determine its deadliness.

The question of whether the global outbreak began with a spillover from wildlife sold at the market or leaked out of the Wuhan lab just eight miles across the Yangtze River has given rise to fierce debate about how to prevent the next pandemic. New studies point to a natural spillover at the Huanan wildlife market. Positive swab samples of floors, cages and counters also track the virus back to stalls in the southwestern corner of the market (bottom left), where animals with the potential to harbor Covid were sold for meat or fur at the time (bott

Covid latches onto human cells with its spike protein, and instructs produce copies of itself.

Scientists measured how many copies each variant caused the health cells to produce.

They found the hybrid strain produced five times more viral particles than the original Omicron.

The scientists admit the hybrid virus is unlikely to be as deadly in humans as it was in mice.

This is because the specific breed of lab mice used are very susceptible to severe Covid disease. Mice and humans also have very different immune responses to the virus.

The lab, at Boston University's National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories, is one of 13 biosafety level 4 labs in the US.

These are labs that are authorized to handle the most dangerous pathogens. There are also facilities in Texas, Atlanta and Manhattan, Kansas.

Experiments at these labs often involve tinkering with animal viruses to advance treatments and vaccines that could be used in a future outbreak.

Work on the live virus that causes Covid must be carried out at a BSL-3 or BSL-4 lab.

In BSL-3 labs, researchers do all experiments in a ‘biosafety cabinet’ — an enclosed, ventilated workspace for handling materials contaminated with pathogens.

The labs also have self-closing doors, sealed windows, floors and walls, and filtered ventilation systems.

In a BSL-4 lab, full-body, air-supplied pressure suits are worn and workers must change their clothing before entering and shower before leaving.

The lab is situated in a separate section of the building and has its own dedicated air supply.

The 'lab leak' origin theory for Covid was initially dismissed as conspiracy at the start of the pandemic in favour of a natural emergence.

But the hypothesis gained momentum following a series of revelations and cover-ups.

Crucial information about the earliest infected patients was wiped from the Wuhan lab's database in late 2019 and one of its staff vanished after coming down with a mysterious flu-like illness.

Have we learned nothing? 40 new biochemical labs that handle dangerous viruses are being built around the world​

The Coronavirus pandemic has prompted a global surge in laboratories that handle dangerous viruses — despite concerns Covid may have been the result of the risky experiments.
More than 40 facilities certified as biosafety level 3 (BSL-3) or BSL-4 have either been built or have gone into construction since 2020, predominantly across Asia.
Many countries believe they were caught flat-footed by Covid and want to get ahead of the next devastating outbreak by studying pathogens that pose a threat to humans.
Experiments at these labs often involve tinkering with animal viruses to advance treatments and vaccines that could be used in a future outbreak.
There are currently 63 BSL-4 labs, the highest level of security, across the globe. This is up from the 59 which were in operation or planned last year. Three-quarters are in urban areas. South America and Africa are some of the places lacking access to the labs

+10
View gallery
There are currently 63 BSL-4 labs, the highest level of security, across the globe. This is up from the 59 which were in operation or planned last year. Three-quarters are in urban areas. South America and Africa are some of the places lacking access to the labs
But there are widespread concerns that these experiments might actually raise the risk of pandemics — something some experts believe was the case with Covid.

The virus first began spreading from a wet market in Wuhan, about eight miles from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), a high security biolab that worked with dangerous bat coronaviruses.

Scientists there worked on some of Covid's closest relatives. They were also found to have wiped crucial databases and stifled independent investigations into the laboratory's links to the pandemic.

Professor Paul Hunter, an expert in infection diseases at the University of East Anglia in England, told DailyMail.com he was concerned about what all the new labs would be used for.

'The issue is what you’re going to be using [the labs] for,' he told this website. 'If they’re for diagnostic purposes, then you need them. But I don’t think every country needs a BSL-4.’

He added: ‘If they start having a dual purpose for research that has offensive military implications, that is the concern.’
Russia has set out its proposals for 15 of the maximum security labs and India is aiming for 18 BSL-3 and BSL-4 labs in total. The US is also adding a further highest level biosecurity lab to its existing 12.


Thank goodness we have all that "Trustworthy Science(tm)" going on!
 

Valann

Contributing Member
From the Ticker Forum-He thinks this would have more of a serious consequence on those vaccinated.

I Warned You; Now You May Well Pay
[Comments enabled]
akcs-www

I hate being right.

On February 13th 2021 I penned an article which you ought to go read again. I said this:
This has now, for the first time in human history, been changed by the idiotic actions of our governments and pharmaceutical companies in that we are now tagging people for death by the literal millions and they will die if an adversary is able to develop a virus that targets those specific antibodies.
Unfortunately we now know this risk is not theoretical. In fact, we now know how someone can do this.
We generated chimeric recombinant SARS-CoV-2 encoding the S gene of Omicron in the backbone of an ancestral SARS-CoV-2 isolate and compared this virus with the naturally circulating Omicron variant. The Omicron S-bearing virus robustly escapes vaccine-induced humoral immunity, mainly due to mutations in the receptor binding motif (RBM), yet unlike naturally occurring Omicron, efficiently replicates in cell lines and primary-like distal lung cells. In K18-hACE2 mice, while Omicron causes mild, non-fatal infection, the Omicron S-carrying virus inflicts severe disease with a mortality rate of 80%. This indicates that while the vaccine escape of Omicron is defined by mutations in S, major determinants of viral pathogenicity reside outside of S.
You sons of bitches -- every single one of the political, medical and pharmaceutical folks involved in making, distributing and coercing, whether through word or deed and whether actual coercion or simply "advocating" for the use of non-sterilizing, S-only jabs should be indicted, tried, convicted and executed for setting the stage for a mass-death event that would never happen if only natural infection was allowed to course through the population.

I have previously documented through multiple published studies that the jabs appear to inhibit, in many people, production of "N" antibodies if you get jabbed before you're infected. It is not known (to my knowledge in the literature anyway; I might have missed it) whether or not being infected first, then jabbed, impacts your "N" response.
If you have only "spike" antibodies and someone -- any someone -- puts this together as described in that paper and it gets out, whether accidentally or otherwise, you're ****ed.

The probability is quite high that if you didn't get the jab and instead were infected naturally you have a decent level of protection and likely will not get seriously ill or be killed by the same virus.

This is the literal Holy Grail of bioweapon research as I pointed out in early 2021 before any mandates were issued against anyone and before the coercion ramped up socially, in job markets and the government and these folks proved my hypothesis and exactly how to do it.

I warned explicitly of this possibility and that while I wasn't all that concerned about it happening naturally (such a mutation is counter to entropy and thus, while possible is very unlikely) human intervention can trivially violate the usual path of entropy in mutation and if someone does that the results could quite-easily be a wildly-lethal outcome for anyone who took the jabs at or even much worse than Smallpox!

Now we have demonstration in the laboratory that not only can it happen but also exactly how to make it happen and it was published so every ******* in the world who might want to make it happen now knows how.
I ****ing hate being right and if you got jabbed or worse, jabbed your kids there's not jack and crap you can do about it if someone does this; the odds are extremely high you will die and there will be nothing you can do to stop it.
S-protein specific jabs have marked every single person they were given to. You must assume that additional "boosters" whether of the original formula or some other will not attenuate this risk and might accelerate it. Only time may -- and I repeat may -- attenuate your risk of getting hammered if such "shows up" in the environment whether by accident or otherwise.
smiley

PS: They lied about the underlying risk of the "natural" virus as well; it was much less-dangerous than reported. If you poisoned your immune system and someone exploits that, as we now know can be done as its no longer theoretical, you are very unlikely to be that fortunate

I Warned You; Now You May Well Pay
 

Melodi

Disaster Cat
Under normal situations, I wouldn't worry that much if it was a normal US/Northern European bio-FOUR level lab.

Except not only are these not normal times but I have a friend here who worked in a level three lab in Northern Ireland a few years ago and some of her stories on lax safety protocols made my hair stand on end. The worst was the vail of Black Death bacteria in the same fridge as the employee lunches. Yeah, I know Bio Four level has much higher protocols or at least it is supposed to, but even then accidents can (and have happened).

Then you add the so-called bio-four-level labs in China and other parts of Asia and the potential for unintended consequences goes through the roof. Even before COVID, employees at Bio-Three level labs in China were caught and convicted of selling the animals they were supposed to destroy at the wet markets as food. I have my suspicions that things like that were going on at Wuhan as well, but no proof of it. I have heard off the record from people who saw that lab though that the standards were nowhere near up to a European or US bio-four level lab. But I've only gotten that second or third-hand, so I can't prove it.

Anyway, then you add the very good question of "why are they doing this at all?" even in the USA, perhaps even under real bio-four level safety conditions (aka Ebola level). The potential for either accidental or intentional leaks is staggering and too horrifying to contemplate either as an accident or bioweapon. If the same type of "research" is going on in China, India, South Korea, Saudi Arabia or Russia; things get even more worrying.
 

somewherepress

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Now we have demonstration in the laboratory that not only can it happen but also exactly how to make it happen and it was published so every ******* in the world who might want to make it happen now knows how.
Absolute insanity....



Role of spike in the pathogenic and antigenic behavior of SARS-CoV-2 BA.1 Omicron​

Da-Yuan Chen, Devin Kenney, Chue Vin Chin, Alexander H. Tavares, Nazimuddin Khan, Hasahn L. Conway, GuanQun Liu, Manish C. Choudhary, Hans P. Gertje, Aoife K. O’Connell, Darrell N. Kotton, Alexandra Herrmann, View ORCID ProfileArmin Ensser, John H. Connor, Markus Bosmann, Jonathan Z. Li, Michaela U. Gack, Susan C. Baker, Robert N. Kirchdoerfer, Yachana Kataria, Nicholas A. Crossland, Florian Douam, Mohsan Saeed
doi: Role of spike in the pathogenic and antigenic behavior of SARS-CoV-2 BA.1 Omicron
This article is a preprint and has not been certified by peer review [what does this mean?].

00001104466


Abstract​

The recently identified, globally predominant SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant (BA.1) is highly transmissible, even in fully vaccinated individuals, and causes attenuated disease compared with other major viral variants recognized to date17. The Omicron spike (S) protein, with an unusually large number of mutations, is considered the major driver of these phenotypes3,8. We generated chimeric recombinant SARS-CoV-2 encoding the S gene of Omicron in the backbone of an ancestral SARS-CoV-2 isolate and compared this virus with the naturally circulating Omicron variant. The Omicron S-bearing virus robustly escapes vaccine-induced humoral immunity, mainly due to mutations in the receptor-binding motif (RBM), yet unlike naturally occurring Omicron, efficiently replicates in cell lines and primary-like distal lung cells. In K18-hACE2 mice, while Omicron causes mild, non-fatal infection, the Omicron S-carrying virus inflicts severe disease with a mortality rate of 80%. This indicates that while the vaccine escape of Omicron is defined by mutations in S, major determinants of viral pathogenicity reside outside of S.

Competing Interest Statement​

The authors have declared no competing interest.
 

somewherepress

Has No Life - Lives on TB
View: https://twitter.com/DrTeckKhong/status/1582067723789824000

Scientists develop new lethal Covid strain that would kill 80% of people infected​

Comment
Liam ColemanMonday 17 Oct 2022 6:11 pm
Share

35SHARES
Boston University scientists have created a new Covid strain with an 80% death rate (Picture: Boston University)
American researchers have developed a new lethal Covid strain in a laboratory – echoing experiments that many fear started the pandemic.

The mutant variant — which is a hybrid of Omicron and the original Wuhan virus — killed 80 per cent of mice infected with it at Boston University.

When a similar group of rodents were exposed to the standard Omicron strain, however, they all survived and only experienced ‘mild’ symptoms.

The scientists also infected human cells with the hybrid variant and found it was five times more infectious than Omicron.


This suggests the man-made virus might be the most contagious form yet.

In the new research, a team of scientists from Boston and Florida extracted Omicron’s spike protein — the unique structure that binds to and invades human cells.


They attached Omicron’s spike to the original wildtype strain that first emerged in Wuhan at the start of the pandemic.
Scientists have combined proteins from different strains of Covid (Picture: Boston University)The new Covid strain was tested on mice (Picture: Boston University)

Writing in the paper, they said: ‘In…mice, while Omicron causes mild, non-fatal infection, the Omicron S-carrying virus inflicts severe disease with a mortality rate of 80 percent.’

The researchers said it signaled that while the spike protein is responsible for infectivity, changes to other parts of its structure determine its deadliness.

The scientists also looked at the different strains’ effect on human lung cells that were grown in the lab.

Covid latches onto human cells with its spike protein, and instructs healthy cells to produce copies of itself.
Scientists measured how many copies each variant caused the health cells to produce.

They found the hybrid strain produced five times more viral particles than the original Omicron.

The scientists admit the hybrid virus would be unlikely to be as deadly in real humans as it was in mice.

They noted that one limitation of their study was the specific breed of mice used, as other types of mice are more similar to humans.

Mice and humans also don’t have identical immune responses, as there are variations in DNA and genes between the species.

The genes that regulate the immune system behave differently, for example, and the response to stress is different in mice and humans.


The type of mice used in the study were developed specifically for looking at severe Covid infection, but currently, no mouse model replicates all aspects of Covid in humans.


The lab, at Boston University’s National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories, is one of 13 biosafety level 4 labs in the US.

These are labs that are authorized to handle the most dangerous pathogens. There are also facilities in Texas, Atlanta and Manhattan, Kansas.

Experiments at these labs often involve tinkering with animal viruses to advance treatments and vaccines that could be used in a future outbreak.
 
Last edited:

Barry Natchitoches

Has No Life - Lives on TB
WHY IN THE HELL are they still playing around with this friggen BIO-HAZARD and making it even stronger?!?!?!?! Have they lost their ever loving minds! STOP! STOP! STOP!!
They can’t stop now. They haven’t killed enough of us yet.

That remark is NOT sarcasm. They have to continue the production (and accidental release) of lethal viruses because too many of us survived Covid Part 1,
.
 

Samuel Adams

Has No Life - Lives on TB
And where are American’s collective protection of life, liberty and property secured in all of this ?

You know….there are supposed to be laws and consequences for allowing any “contaminant” from exiting one’s property to the detriment of the RIGHTS of everyone else……
 

Dr. G

Senior Member
and does ivermectin, vit D stop it?
Probably not, this variant is a concern with people that took the shot as it appears that the shot(s) result in the inhibition of the production of N antibodies. In other words "vaccinated" people will not mount a immune response, (your body won't recognize it's being attacked). "Non-vaccinated people will, for the most, part cruise through this infection, (once it gets into the general population). On the other hand, our military has the potential to be completely and totally decimated, along with the rest of our society.

Folks, this one has the potential to be extremely serious. Pay close attention.
 

psychgirl

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Probably not, this variant is a concern with people that took the shot as it appears that the shot(s) result in the inhibition of the production of N antibodies. In other words "vaccinated" people will not mount a immune response, (your body won't recognize it's being attacked). "Non-vaccinated people will, for the most, part cruise through this infection, (once it gets into the general population). On the other hand, our military has the potential to be completely and totally decimated, along with the rest of our society.

Folks, this one has the potential to be extremely serious. Pay close attention.
Good Lord.
 

Seeker22

Has No Life - Lives on TB
From the Ticker Forum-He thinks this would have more of a serious consequence on those vaccinated.

I Warned You; Now You May Well Pay
[Comments enabled]
akcs-www

I hate being right.

On February 13th 2021 I penned an article which you ought to go read again. I said this:

Unfortunately we now know this risk is not theoretical. In fact, we now know how someone can do this.

You sons of bitches -- every single one of the political, medical and pharmaceutical folks involved in making, distributing and coercing, whether through word or deed and whether actual coercion or simply "advocating" for the use of non-sterilizing, S-only jabs should be indicted, tried, convicted and executed for setting the stage for a mass-death event that would never happen if only natural infection was allowed to course through the population.

I have previously documented through multiple published studies that the jabs appear to inhibit, in many people, production of "N" antibodies if you get jabbed before you're infected. It is not known (to my knowledge in the literature anyway; I might have missed it) whether or not being infected first, then jabbed, impacts your "N" response.
If you have only "spike" antibodies and someone -- any someone -- puts this together as described in that paper and it gets out, whether accidentally or otherwise, you're ****ed.

The probability is quite high that if you didn't get the jab and instead were infected naturally you have a decent level of protection and likely will not get seriously ill or be killed by the same virus.

This is the literal Holy Grail of bioweapon research as I pointed out in early 2021 before any mandates were issued against anyone and before the coercion ramped up socially, in job markets and the government and these folks proved my hypothesis and exactly how to do it.

I warned explicitly of this possibility and that while I wasn't all that concerned about it happening naturally (such a mutation is counter to entropy and thus, while possible is very unlikely) human intervention can trivially violate the usual path of entropy in mutation and if someone does that the results could quite-easily be a wildly-lethal outcome for anyone who took the jabs at or even much worse than Smallpox!

Now we have demonstration in the laboratory that not only can it happen but also exactly how to make it happen and it was published so every ******* in the world who might want to make it happen now knows how.
I ****ing hate being right and if you got jabbed or worse, jabbed your kids there's not jack and crap you can do about it if someone does this; the odds are extremely high you will die and there will be nothing you can do to stop it.
S-protein specific jabs have marked every single person they were given to. You must assume that additional "boosters" whether of the original formula or some other will not attenuate this risk and might accelerate it. Only time may -- and I repeat may -- attenuate your risk of getting hammered if such "shows up" in the environment whether by accident or otherwise.
smiley

PS: They lied about the underlying risk of the "natural" virus as well; it was much less-dangerous than reported. If you poisoned your immune system and someone exploits that, as we now know can be done as its no longer theoretical, you are very unlikely to be that fortunate

I Warned You; Now You May Well Pay

Feature; not bug.
 

BUBBAHOTEPT

Veteran Member
Ok, come on WIZARDS OF SMART, throw us a bone here and explain this s*** away. I’m ready for the third time this year -an all time generational high score- to see the cup half full. I’ll take any of your COVID convoluted explanations using SCIENCE AT THE SPEED OF LIGHT to help me sleep at night…..:shr:
 

OldArcher

Has No Life - Lives on TB

Boston University CREATES a new Covid strain that has an 80% kill rate — echoing dangerous experiments feared to have started pandemic​

  • Researchers added Omicron's spike protein to the original Wuhan Covid strain
  • Omicron's spike is highly mutated which made it the most infectious variant ever
  • Eight in 10 mice infected with the lab-created strain died at Boston University lab
By CAITLIN TILLEY, HEALTH REPORTER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

PUBLISHED: 11:02 EDT, 17 October 2022 | UPDATED: 13:04 EDT, 17 October 2022

US researchers have developed a new lethal Covid strain in a laboratory – echoing the type of experiments many fear started the pandemic.

The mutant variant — which is a hybrid of Omicron and the original Wuhan virus — killed 80 percent of mice infected with it at Boston University.

When a similar group of rodents were exposed to the standard Omicron strain, however, they all survived and only experienced 'mild' symptoms.

ADVERTISEMENT

The scientists also infected human cells with the hybrid variant and found it was five times more infectious than Omicron.

This suggests the man-made virus might be the most contagious form yet.

It will no doubt surprise many Americans that such experiments continue to go on in the US despite concerns similar studies may have led to the global Covid outbreak.

Covid first began spreading from a wet market in Wuhan, China, about eight miles from a similar high-security virology laboratory that manipulated bat coronaviruses.

Chinese scientists were found to have wiped crucial databases and stifled independent investigations into the facility's links to the pandemic.

In the new research , which has not been peer-reviewed, a team of researchers from Boston and Florida extracted Omicron's spike protein ¿ the unique structure that binds to and invades human cells. It has always been present but it has become more evolved over time. Omicron has dozens of mutations in its spike protein that made it so infectious. Researchers attached Omicron's spike protein to the original wildtype strain that first emerged in Wuhan at the start of the pandemic. The researchers looked at how mice fared under the new hybrid strain compared to the original Omicron variant's spike protein ¿ the unique structure that binds to and invades human cells. It has always been present but it has become more evolved over time. Omicron has dozens of mutations in its spike protein that made it so infectious. Researchers attached Omicron's spike protein to the original wildtype strain that first emerged in Wuhan at the start of the pandemic. The researchers looked at how mice fared under the new hybrid strain compared to the original Omicron variant

+10
View gallery
In the new research , which has not been peer-reviewed, a team of researchers from Boston and Florida extracted Omicron's spike protein — the unique structure that binds to and invades human cells. It has always been present but it has become more evolved over time. Omicron has dozens of mutations in its spike protein that made it so infectious. Researchers attached Omicron's spike protein to the original wildtype strain that first emerged in Wuhan at the start of the pandemic. The researchers looked at how mice fared under the new
80 percent of mice died from the new man-made Covid strain, while none died from the milder Omicron variant alone, researchers at Boston University's National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories found
In the new research, which has not been peer-reviewed, a team of researchers from Boston and Florida extracted Omicron's spike protein — the unique structure that binds to and invades human cells.

It has always been present in the virus but has become more evolved over time. Omicron has dozens of mutations on its spike protein that made it so infectious.

Researchers attached Omicron's spike to the original wildtype strain that first emerged in Wuhan at the start of the pandemic.

The researchers looked at how mice fared against the new hybrid strain compared to the original Omicron variant.

Writing in the paper, they said: ‘In...mice, while Omicron causes mild, non-fatal infection, the Omicron S-carrying virus inflicts severe disease with a mortality rate of 80 percent.’

The researchers said it signaled that while the spike protein is responsible for infectivity, changes to other parts of its structure determine its deadliness.

The question of whether the global outbreak began with a spillover from wildlife sold at the market or leaked out of the Wuhan lab just eight miles across the Yangtze River has given rise to fierce debate about how to prevent the next pandemic. New studies point to a natural spillover at the Huanan wildlife market. Positive swab samples of floors, cages and counters also track the virus back to stalls in the southwestern corner of the market (bottom left), where animals with the potential to harbor Covid were sold for meat or fur at the time (bott

Covid latches onto human cells with its spike protein, and instructs produce copies of itself.

Scientists measured how many copies each variant caused the health cells to produce.

They found the hybrid strain produced five times more viral particles than the original Omicron.

The scientists admit the hybrid virus is unlikely to be as deadly in humans as it was in mice.

This is because the specific breed of lab mice used are very susceptible to severe Covid disease. Mice and humans also have very different immune responses to the virus.

The lab, at Boston University's National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories, is one of 13 biosafety level 4 labs in the US.

These are labs that are authorized to handle the most dangerous pathogens. There are also facilities in Texas, Atlanta and Manhattan, Kansas.

Experiments at these labs often involve tinkering with animal viruses to advance treatments and vaccines that could be used in a future outbreak.

Work on the live virus that causes Covid must be carried out at a BSL-3 or BSL-4 lab.

In BSL-3 labs, researchers do all experiments in a ‘biosafety cabinet’ — an enclosed, ventilated workspace for handling materials contaminated with pathogens.

The labs also have self-closing doors, sealed windows, floors and walls, and filtered ventilation systems.

In a BSL-4 lab, full-body, air-supplied pressure suits are worn and workers must change their clothing before entering and shower before leaving.

The lab is situated in a separate section of the building and has its own dedicated air supply.

The 'lab leak' origin theory for Covid was initially dismissed as conspiracy at the start of the pandemic in favour of a natural emergence.

But the hypothesis gained momentum following a series of revelations and cover-ups.

Crucial information about the earliest infected patients was wiped from the Wuhan lab's database in late 2019 and one of its staff vanished after coming down with a mysterious flu-like illness.

Have we learned nothing? 40 new biochemical labs that handle dangerous viruses are being built around the world​

The Coronavirus pandemic has prompted a global surge in laboratories that handle dangerous viruses — despite concerns Covid may have been the result of the risky experiments.
More than 40 facilities certified as biosafety level 3 (BSL-3) or BSL-4 have either been built or have gone into construction since 2020, predominantly across Asia.
Many countries believe they were caught flat-footed by Covid and want to get ahead of the next devastating outbreak by studying pathogens that pose a threat to humans.
Experiments at these labs often involve tinkering with animal viruses to advance treatments and vaccines that could be used in a future outbreak.
There are currently 63 BSL-4 labs, the highest level of security, across the globe. This is up from the 59 which were in operation or planned last year. Three-quarters are in urban areas. South America and Africa are some of the places lacking access to the labs

+10
View gallery
There are currently 63 BSL-4 labs, the highest level of security, across the globe. This is up from the 59 which were in operation or planned last year. Three-quarters are in urban areas. South America and Africa are some of the places lacking access to the labs
But there are widespread concerns that these experiments might actually raise the risk of pandemics — something some experts believe was the case with Covid.

The virus first began spreading from a wet market in Wuhan, about eight miles from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), a high security biolab that worked with dangerous bat coronaviruses.

Scientists there worked on some of Covid's closest relatives. They were also found to have wiped crucial databases and stifled independent investigations into the laboratory's links to the pandemic.

Professor Paul Hunter, an expert in infection diseases at the University of East Anglia in England, told DailyMail.com he was concerned about what all the new labs would be used for.

'The issue is what you’re going to be using [the labs] for,' he told this website. 'If they’re for diagnostic purposes, then you need them. But I don’t think every country needs a BSL-4.’

He added: ‘If they start having a dual purpose for research that has offensive military implications, that is the concern.’
Russia has set out its proposals for 15 of the maximum security labs and India is aiming for 18 BSL-3 and BSL-4 labs in total. The US is also adding a further highest level biosecurity lab to its existing 12.

Wonderful. Haven’t these arseholes, or their superiors, ever heard of Murphy’s Laws?

OA
 

LightEcho

Has No Life - Lives on TB
In my previous 2 jobs, I visited places like this. I know MANY of the people in these facilities and have seen how they operate biosecurity. The NIEDL project was built without permission to conduct BSL4 or even 3 research. It was vacant for years before they got approval. That was actually good. The original construction was defective. It was a well-kept secret that the walls, which were supposed to be part of the containment, began to crack with cheap concrete. They had to all be resurfaced inside the rooms. Most of the people I knew were good folk who meant well. But the research system is flawed horribly. Money was granted to those with approved research, i.e. research wanted by NIH, NAIAD (Fauci's home), and whoever had the political / financial clout. What I saw was a system of thousands of research facilities in America that should never do gain-of-function research. And I am just a dope. So, you can be assured, the educated idiots were completely delusional and/or evil.
 
Top