WAR Main Persian Gulf Trouble thread

jward

passin' thru
U.S. intelligence shows Iran threats on U.S. soil, but Blinken and Schiff say this shouldn't derail new nuclear deal
By Margaret Brennan

Updated on: March 12, 2022 / 1:28 PM / CBS News
Biden administration faces bipartisan push for Russian oil ban amid record-breaking gas prices




The U.S. intelligence community has assessed that Iran will threaten Americans — both directly and via proxy attacks — and that Tehran remains committed to developing networks inside the U.S., according to the intelligence community's 2022 Annual Threat Assessment, published Tuesday by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI).
Now, with the U.S. on the cusp of a diplomatic accord with Iran over its nuclear program, as well as a potential deal regarding the release of four American prisoners, it is not clear whether the Biden administration can extract any further concessions or convince Tehran to cease its other malign activities, including any on U.S. soil.

CBS News has obtained two persistent threat assessments submitted to Congress by the State Department in January 2022 which cited a "serious and credible threat" on the lives of former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and former Trump administration Iran envoy Brian Hook. These non-public assessments show that throughout 2021, and again in 2022, the State Department assessed the need to provide round-the-clock, U.S.-taxpayer funded diplomatic security details to both men.
Click here to view related media.




According to another report marked sensitive but unclassified and obtained by CBS News, U.S. taxpayers are paying more than $2 million a month to protect Pompeo and Hook. The projected costs include vehicle and travel costs as well as salary and pay for the agents working for the State Department's Bureau of Diplomatic Security. The document was first reported by The Associated Press.

The hefty security entourage that continues to travel with Pompeo, a potential 2024 Republican presidential candidate, has garnered attention during his public appearances including at the recent Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC). The size of the detail rivals one that is typical for a current cabinet member.

The most recent threat assessment signed by Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Brian McKeon cites a determination made as of July 16, 2021 that Pompeo faced such threats "from a foreign power or the agent of a foreign power." McKeon also said he had determined on at least three occasions that a specific threat to former envoy Hook required security, most recently in November 2021.

Two current and three former U.S. officials confirmed that Iran is the foreign actor, but details of the specific threats were not described in the assessments provided to Congress. The Free Beacon first reported the existence of the non-public threat assessment.

The FBI also thwarted an Iranian intelligence network plot to kidnap New York-based journalist Maseh Alinejad, and Tehran is threatening current U.S. officials, which was acknowledged publicly by the intelligence community on Tuesday. The ODNI report said that the threat to current officials was in retaliation for the U.S. drone strike that killed Iran's most powerful military general, Commander Qasem Soleimani, in January 2020, and that Iran "has previously attempted to conduct lethal operations in the United States."


On "Face the Nation" this past Sunday, Secretary of State Antony Blinken sidestepped a question about whether a renewed diplomatic agreement with Iran regarding its nuclear program would also address threats on U.S. soil, including any targeting his predecessor, Mike Pompeo, who was secretary of state when the assassination strike against Soleimani took place. Blinken instead addressed the broad threat posed to U.S. personnel from Iranian malign actors, saying, "We will stand and act against those every single day."

The secretary has previously said that Iran is weeks away from obtaining enough fissile material for a nuclear bomb, hence the U.S. attempts to revive the 2015 international agreement known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which would lift sanctions on Iran in exchange for a temporary cap on its nuclear development. President Trump exited the JCPOA in 2018 by sanctioning Iran, and in July 2019, Iran began nuclear-related activities that exceeded limits of that agreement. The intelligence community assesses that if Iran does not win sanctions relief, then it will proceed with enriching nuclear fuel to weapons grade material.

"We were very clear when we were in the deal originally that nothing about the deal prevents us from taking action against Iran when it's engaged in actions that threaten us, threaten our allies and partners. That will very much continue," Blinken said.

House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff agrees that the threats do not have to be addressed in any renewed nuclear-related deal with Iran.


"These other malign activities of Iran's, their plots against the U.S. personnel or Americans around the world we can deal with and have to deal with separately, and we should deal with them aggressively," Schiff told CBS News' "Face the Nation" on Sunday. "We need to go after all of this, not necessarily in one agreement."

The Biden administration has been explicit about its commitment to one specific issue outside the parameters of Iran's nuclear program, though, and that is the fate of four Americans imprisoned in Iran. Last month, U.S. Special Envoy for Iran Robert Malley told Reuters that a nuclear deal is unlikely without their release. Iran has insisted on the unfreezing of billions of dollars in state assets sitting in bank accounts in U.S. ally South Korea in exchange for the release of imprisoned Westerners.


Iran: Crisis In The Middle East

Iraq Attack
U.S. sanctions Iranians after ballistic missile strikes in Iraq, Gulf states


ISRAEL-US-ARAB-DIPLOMACY
Israel hosts Blinken, top Arab diplomats as Mideast dynamic shifts


Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe detained
Iran releases 2 British citizens jailed for over 5 years


IRAQ-ERBIL-MISSILE ATTACK
After missile strike, Iran says it won't tolerate "threats" from Iraq

More
Margaret Brennan
Margaret Brennan is moderator of CBS News' "Face The Nation" and CBS News' senior foreign affairs correspondent based in Washington, D.C.
 

jward

passin' thru
Price protests turn political in Iran as rallies spread
Reuters




3 minute read
Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com
DUBAI, May 15 (Reuters) - Spreading protests across Iran over a cut in state subsidies on food have turned political with slogans calling for top leaders to step down, according to posts on social media, and unconfirmed reports said at least four protesters were killed.

Protests began in some cities last week sparked by the government's subsidy cut decision that caused price hikes in Iran by as much as 300% for a variety of flour-based staples.


The government also raised prices of some basic goods such as cooking oil and dairy products in Iran, where almost half of its 85 million population is under poverty line, according to official figures.

Now protesters have expanded their demands, calling for more political freedom, an end to the Islamic Republic and the downfall of its leaders, according to witnesses and social media posts.

Videos posted online showed demonstrators burned images of Iran's top authority, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and called for the return of Reza Pahlavi, the exiled son of the toppled Shah of Iran.


Footage on Twitter showed protests in dozens of provinces such as Ardabil, Khuzestan, Lorestan and Razavi Khorasan. Some state-affiliated media, meanwhile, said calm had been restored in the country.

However, Protests continued on early Sunday in at least 40 cities and towns across Iran, including in the town of Quchan near the Turkmen border, the northern city of Rasht and the western city of Hamedan, according to videos posted on social media.


Reuters could not independently confirm authenticity of social media posts and videos. Iran's state news agency IRNA said on Friday that some shops were "set on fire in some cities", prompting police to arrest scores of "provocateurs".

The semi-official ILNA news agency on Saturday, citing a lawmaker, said one protester was killed in Dezful, a city in the oil producing southwestern province of Khuzestan. But videos on Twitter showed at least four demonstrators were killed by security forces. read more

Residents of the capital, contacted by Reuters on Sunday, reported a heavy presence of security forces across Tehran.

Global internet monitor NetBlocks on Saturday reported a disruption lasting hours in Iran amid protests, a potential move by the authorities to prevent protesters from communicating with each other and sharing video on social media.

The latest unrest adds to mounting pressure on Iran's rulers, who are struggling to keep the crippled economy afloat under U.S. sanctions, reimposed since 2018 when Washington ditched Tehran's 2015 nuclear deal with major powers. Talks to revive the pact have stalled since March. read more

Fearing a revival of protests in recent years that seemed to shed light on the establishment's vulnerability to popular anger over the economy, the government has described its decision as "fair redistribution" of subsidies to lower-income people.

In 2019, what began as scattered protests over a surprise increase in fuel prices, quickly spread into one of the biggest challenges to Iran’s rulers, sparking the bloodiest crackdown in the 40-year history of the Islamic Republic.

The reported death toll in 2019 has varied between a Reuters account of 1,500 dead and an Amnesty International figure of more than 300. Both have been dismissed by Iranian authorities.

 

jward

passin' thru
Will the next Iran deal deadline, June 6, finally lead to a resolution? - analysis
A deal signed by the IAEA and Tehran is set to end in June 6-10, and the next meeting of the IAEA board of governers is planned for June 6.
By YONAH JEREMY BOB
Published: MAY 15, 2022 19:40

Updated: MAY 15, 2022 20:38
Email Twitter Facebook fb-messenger
European External Action Service (EEAS) Deputy Secretary General Enrique Mora and Iranian Deputy at Ministry of Foreign Affairs Abbas Araghchi wait for the start of talks on reviving the 2015 Iran nuclear deal in Vienna, Austria June 20, 2021. (photo credit: EU DELEGATION IN VIENNA/HANDOUT VIA REUTERS)

European External Action Service (EEAS) Deputy Secretary General Enrique Mora and Iranian Deputy at Ministry of Foreign Affairs Abbas Araghchi wait for the start of talks on reviving the 2015 Iran nuclear deal in Vienna, Austria June 20, 2021.
(photo credit: EU DELEGATION IN VIENNA/HANDOUT VIA REUTERS)



What is the state of play in the negotiations over the Iran nuclear deal?

Several contradictory signals were put out this week about whether or not a deal may be imminent around June 6-10, when a deal between the International Atomic Energy Agency and Tehran signed in March is supposed to expire.

In addition, June 6 is when the next meeting of the IAEA board of governors is taking place.




The Islamic Republic and world powers have started to talk more seriously several times whenever the quarterly IAEA board of governors meeting is taking place.

When expectations were high at the end of 2021 and then again in March that there would be a deal, it was always because there was an expectation that the ayatollahs would want a deal before the IAEA board of governors meeting.

 The Iranian flag waves in front of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) headquarters, amid the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, in Vienna, Austria May 23, 2021. (credit: REUTERS/LEONHARD FOEGER)
The Iranian flag waves in front of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) headquarters, amid the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, in Vienna, Austria May 23, 2021. (credit: REUTERS/LEONHARD FOEGER)
In June 2020, the board of governors condemned Tehran, leading within a short time to the Islamic Republic making a number of concessions to IAEA inspectors.

If the agency were to condemn Iran again at any of the recent meetings or at the upcoming June 6 meeting, there would be a higher chance that it might also refer the issue to the UN Security Council.

This is something which Tehran wants to avoid.


However, it is still unclear if Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khameini is desperate enough to avoid a referral that he will make real compromises. Will he view the UNSC as sufficiently threatening to make concessions on his nuclear program for a deal to go through?

In broad outline, the parties to the negotiations had already agreed on most issues back in March.

Reportedly, the US will allow Iran to keep its hundreds of new advanced centrifuges in storage instead of having to destroy them. This radically shortened Iran’s potential breakout time to a nuclear weapon.

Besides that provision, the deal would basically resemble the JCPOA in which Iran had to limit the volume of uranium it enriches, and the quality and number of centrifuges it operates at any one time in exchange for sanctions relief.

The sticking point has been whether the US would then remove the IRGC Quds Force from its terror list and whether Tehran would make some commitments about it not attacking American interests globally in exchange.

Essentially, the US is either willing to do a “clean” return to the JCPOA without dealing with the IRGC issue or to remove the IRGC Quds Force from the terror list in exchange for commitments regarding not attacking US interests.

The question is whether Iran will embrace either of these two options offered by the Biden administration.


Part of the threat was hyped up last week by IAEA Director-General Rafael Grossi, who commented that Iran has failed to provide the requisite clarifications regarding illicit traces of uranium found by inspectors as well as explanations regarding undeclared nuclear sites.

These issues date back to the Mossad’s raid on Iran’s nuclear archives in 2018, but every time Grossi raises these issues in public, it appears to be a signal that the West in general has lost patience and is more ready for confrontation.

At the same time, Iran still seems to be trying to determine whether it can outlast Western sanctions, given the changed geopolitical context in which Russia, China and other countries are further splitting off from the West.

And so, three months of playing chicken may come to an end in the coming weeks with Khameini finally either choosing to move more decisively toward a diplomatic resolution or to a destabilizing global brawl.




Tags IAEA Iran Nuclear Deal
 

jward

passin' thru
Not sure what, if any, concerning implications arise from this death. . .

World leaders descend on UAE to pay respects to late ruler
By ISABEL DEBREyesterday


French President Emmanuel Macron, left, meets newly-elected president of the United Arab Emirates Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan to mourn the death of Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan at Al Mushrif Palace in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, Sunday, May 15, 2022. (Christian Hartmann, Pool via AP)

1 of 10
French President Emmanuel Macron, left, meets newly-elected president of the United Arab Emirates Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan to mourn the death of Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan at Al Mushrif Palace in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, Sunday, May 15, 2022. (Christian Hartmann, Pool via AP)


DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — An array of presidents and prime ministers continued to descend on the United Arab Emirates Sunday from around the world to pay their respects to the federation’s late ruler. They also came to praise his successor, Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan — a vivid sign of Abu Dhabi’s influence in Western and Arab capitals.
The first Western leader to jet to the oil-rich emirate was French President Emmanuel Macron. He met with Sheikh Mohammed to pay tribute to Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the long-ailing ruler who died Friday at the age of 73 after years presiding over the country’s rapid transformation into a global business hub and regional power center.

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson arrived later Sunday to offer condolences, along with other leaders including Israel’s president after the two countries opened formal relations in 2020.
A high-profile American delegation led by Vice President Kamala Harris is due to visit the UAE on Monday, a bid to ease tensions and show support as relations between the countries have strained under President Joe Biden. The delegation will include the U.S. secretary of state, secretary of defense and CIA director, among others.

“He was respected by all for the values of peace, openness and dialogue that he embodied,” Macron wrote on Twitter of Sheikh Khalifa, expressing “full support” for the ascension of his half-brother Sheikh Mohammed after rulers in the federation unanimously appointed him as president.
As crown prince of Abu Dhabi, Sheikh Mohammed has served as the nation’s de facto leader since Sheikh Khalifa suffered a stroke in 2014. He has turned the small UAE — population 10 million — into one of the most influential Arab states. With Abu Dhabi’s petrodollars and substantial military along with Dubai’s major firms and glitzy hotels, the UAE has come to wield outsized power across the Middle East and Africa.

Even as the country became entangled in the bloody, yearslong conflict in Yemen and a chaotic proxy war in Libya, it positioned itself as a savvy and reliable partner in Western capitals.
Paris and Abu Dhabi have become increasingly aligned in recent years, sharing a deep mistrust of Islamist movements like the Muslim Brotherhood across the region, including in Turkey and Libya.
France opened a major overseas naval base in Abu Dhabi. French warplanes and personnel are also stationed at a facility outside the Emirati capital. The two governments jointly built a gleaming branch of the Louvre museum in the emirate.
During Macron’s visit to Dubai last December, France clinched its biggest overseas order for its Rafale combat jet with the UAE — an $18 billion deal that came as a planned U.S. sale of advanced F-35 fighter jets to the UAE stalled in part over American concerns about the Emirates’ relationship with China.
British Prime Minister Johnson, for his part, said his visit to mourn Sheikh Khalifa showed “the deep ties which unite our countries will continue through our cooperation and friendship.”

It marked Johnson’s second trip this year to the desert sheikhdom, a leading investor in the United Kingdom and key export market after Britain’s exit from the European Union. In March Johnson met with Sheikh Mohammed to persuade him to boost oil production and soothe energy markets after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — ultimately to no avail.
Queen Elizabeth II also congratulated Sheikh Mohammed on his assumption of power and praised her country’s “strong and historic bonds” with the UAE, a former British protectorate.
Sheikh Mohammed’s assertive foreign policy in the Arab world was on stark display as allied leaders rushed to the capital on Saturday to express sorrow over Sheikh Khalifa’s death and congratulate Sheikh Mohammed on his formal ascension to power.
Among the first was Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sissi, the Egyptian general who, with Gulf Arab support, overthrew an elected but divisive Islamist government in 2013.
Emirati-backed Tunisian President Kais Saied, who has amassed nearly absolute power in the country since dismissing the prime minister last year, also flew in to pay tribute, along with Jordan’s King Abdullah II and Iraq’s president and prime minister.

Sudan’s Abdel-Fattah Burhan, the general who led the coup in the strategic east African nation last year, has made frequent visits to key backer Sheikh Mohammed. He posted footage on social media Saturday sprinting up stairs to board his plane to Abu Dhabi to honor the late Emirati president.
The UAE’s recent deal to normalize ties with Israel, borne from mutual enmity for Iran, is also indicative of Sheikh Mohammed’s quietly assertive foreign policy. Before Israel’s largely ceremonial President Isaac Herzog took off for Abu Dhabi on Sunday, he offered words of gratitude for the Emirates’ leaders.

“The partnership between our countries is an asset for us and for the whole region and it has been built and is still being built by bold and groundbreaking leaders,” he said.
Qatari Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani made his first visit to the UAE on Sunday since 2017, when the Emirates joined a Saudi-led boycott of the tiny energy-rich state over its support for Islamists. The Arab states dropped their embargo and reopened borders last year, although relations remain chilly between Abu Dhabi and Doha.
Meanwhile, Mohammed bin Salman, Saudi Arabia’s own upstart crown prince who has had a close relationship with Sheikh Mohammed, delivered his condolences on the phone.
 

jward

passin' thru

Aurora Intel
@AuroraIntel

1m

Initial reports that #IRGC’s Colonel Hassan Sayad Khodayari has been assassinated in Tehran, #Iran.




ELINT News
@ELINTNews

1m

#UPDATE: IRGC “defender of the Shrines” Colonel Hassan Sayad Khodayari has been shot 5 times and killed in Tehran




Jason Brodsky
@JasonMBrodsky

6m

#BREAKING: First photos from the scene today of the assassination in Tehran. Warning: graphic images. #Iran
View: https://twitter.com/JasonMBrodsky/status/1528381174825066500?s=20&t=8bKlG_-ipPc4rkSb1v3YdA
 

jward

passin' thru
Colonel in Iran Revolutionary Guards assassinated
Published
10 hours ago



A handout photo made available by the Iranian Revolutionary guard (IRGC) social Telegram channel shows, family and relatives gather around the scene of gun shooting of a member of Iranian Quds force Hossein Sayad Khodai

Image source, EPA
Image caption,
Family gather around the car that Colonel Sayad Khodai was assassinated in

A colonel in Iran's Islamic Revolution Guard Corps (IRGC) has been shot dead in a rare assassination in Tehran.
Two gunmen on a motorbike are reported to have shot Colonel Sayad Khodai five times in a car outside his home.
So far, no group has claimed responsibility for Sunday's attack, and a manhunt is under way for the gunmen.
It is the biggest security breach in Iran since 2020 when a leading nuclear scientist was killed.

Images from the scene show a bloodied man slumped over in a car with his seatbelt still on.
Col Khodai was a senior member of the elite Quds Force, a shadowy external arm of the IRGC that carries out operations abroad. The United States accuses the force of supporting terrorist organisations and being responsible for attacks across the Middle East.




Colonel Sayad Khodai

Image source, EPA
Image caption,
Colonel Sayad Khodai

Short presentational transparent line


Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Saeed Khatibzadeh said the colonel was assassinated by "sworn enemies" of Iran who are "the terrorist agents affiliated with the global arrogance" - a reference to the US and its allies - and said other countries that "claim to be fighting terrorism are regrettably silent and support it".

Previously, Iranian officials have accused Israel of being behind such high profile assassinations.
As news of the assassination broke, Iranian state news reported that Revolutionary Guards had exposed and arrested a network of Israeli spies. There has been no official comment from Israel.
Khodai is the second high profile Quds Force leader to be killed in recent years.

In 2020, Iran's most powerful military commander, Gen Qasem Soleimani, was killed by a US air strike in Iraq. He spearheaded Iranian military operations in the Middle East as head of the Quds Force, and his death marked a major escalation in tensions between Washington and Tehran.
In the same year, nuclear scientist Mohsen Fakhrizadeh was shot dead in Tehran. Fakhrizadeh - who was so important he was always accompanied by several bodyguards - played a crucial role in Iran's nuclear programme but the government insists its nuclear activities are entirely peaceful.

Iran accused Israel of using a remote-controlled weapon to kill him.
Posted for fair use
 

jward

passin' thru
Israel Radar
@IsraelRadar_com

3h

Ex-military intel chief Yadlin: Iran planning revenge operation against Israel for killing of senior officer in Tehran, security services must prepare for escalation (via @GLZRadio)

#Israel will boost security measures around diplomatic missions abroad to counter potential revenge attacks by Iran (journalist Smadar Peri via @YediotAhronot); Iranian leader Raisi vows to avenge killing of IRGC colonel Khodayari.
 

jward

passin' thru
Hmm.

Gabriel Noronha
@GLNoronha


BREAKING: after months of Congressional pressure, @USEnvoyIran Rob Malley caves and announces the@StateDept will submit any Iran deal it reaches to Congress pursuant to INARA. This comes after a year-long effort by the administration to bypass Congress and the law.


9:31 AM · May 25, 2022·Twitter Web App


Replying to
@GLNoronha
@USEnvoyIran
and
@StateDept
It means there will never be a deal and practically speaking war has started between US and Iran and US and Russia. Welcome to the 150 USD per barrel above oil or severe lockdown worlds
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
Gabriel Noronha@GLNoronha
BREAKING: after months of Congressional pressure, @USEnvoyIran Rob Malley caves and announces the@StateDept will submit any Iran deal it reaches to Congress pursuant to INARA. This comes after a year-long effort by the administration to bypass Congress and the law.
9:31 AM · May 25, 2022·Twitter Web App


Replying to @GLNoronha @USEnvoyIran and @StateDept
It means there will never be a deal and practically speaking war has started between US and Iran and US and Russia. Welcome to the 150 USD per barrel above oil or severe lockdown worlds


I agree. This is a major development and does not bode well for peace in that region either. I've posted this on a different thread - this is the window for Israel to destroy Iranian nukes if they're going to do it. The fear of involving Russia in Iran's defense has been the major obstacle and right now Russia is just spread too thin with what's going on in Ukraine and with Norway/Sweden about to join NATO to come to Iran's aid. Also the relationship between Israel and Saudi Arabia and UAE has never been this good, and they are all mutual enemies of Iran, so I expect they will support Israel (at least at the beginning, I doubt that support will hold if this ends up going bad - too much pressure from the Arab League will get them to fold, and not be reliable partners, imho). I wasn't expecting the Exec Branch to support Israel (0bama/Brennan/Rice/Kerry/Jarrett and their puppets Biden and Harris), but did expect the Congress to and this development shows that that is going to happen now too.

ETA: I think George Soros' recent posturing may also add to this equation which I hadn't considered before. I think either he'd support taking out Iranian's nuclear capabilities and when he speaks, they (tptb and major decision makers) listen to him or he just knows it's coming ( "Indeed, the Russian invasion may turn out to be the beginning of World War III, and our civilization may not survive it." - George Soros to the WEF May 24 2022)

HD
 
Last edited:

jward

passin' thru
Right on schedule, more boom-boom-burns


*Parchin is famous for hosting a military complex that was under suspicion by the IAEA and Iran continiously denied inspectors access to it.



EndGameWW3
@EndGameWW3

1h

Two Iranian military experts were killed as a result of a huge explosion that took place at a military site belonging to the Iranian defense industries sector in the southeast of the capital, Tehran.
View: https://twitter.com/EndGameWW3/status/1529608190559768577?s=20&t=Ut8P_rHrXqzhFSaHaU8yZg




This is what Iran is saying about the explosion. Parchin is an Iranian military base that is tied to Iran's nuclear program.
View: https://twitter.com/EndGameWW3/status/1529611277659684866?s=20&t=Ut8P_rHrXqzhFSaHaU8yZg
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
Now it's the opposite problem. Russia not only not going to be able to help Iran, they are leaving Syria and creating a vaccuum for the Iranians and Hezbollah to move in and fortify themselves on Israel's northern border :(. It is looking like one more theater of war is more and more likely. (And that's probably not going to be the only one in the near future)


(fair use applies)

Russia said to pull troops from Syria to bolster forces in Ukraine
In worrying development for Israel, now-abandoned bases reportedly transferred to IRGC and Hezbollah; Moscow has been main force in Syria preventing Iranian expansion
By TOI staff
8 May 2022, 11:01 pm

Russia has begun the process of withdrawing some of its troops in Syria to help bolster its forces in Ukraine, the Moscow Times reported.

According to the Friday report in the independent, Dutch-based paper, several military units have been relocated from bases across the country to three unnamed Mediterranean airports, from where they will be transferred to Ukraine.
The report also said that the now-abandoned bases have been transferred to Iran’s paramilitary Revolutionary Guards Corps, as well as the Lebanese terror group Hezbollah.

Damascus is a staunch ally of Moscow, which intervened in the Syrian civil war in 2015 by launching airstrikes to support Syrian President Bashas Assad’s struggling forces.

Russia’s intervention in Syria marked a turning point in the conflict.

It enabled pro-regime forces to wrest back lost territory in a series of victories against rebels and jihadists involving deadly bombardments and massive destruction.

More than 63,000 Russian military personnel have deployed to Syria, Moscow says.

The new development could be problematic for Israel, which has sought to prevent Iranian entrenchment in Syria.

In an op-ed for Israel’s Channel 12 news, Middle East pundit Ehud Ya’ari warned that without Russian influence in Damascus and on the ground, Tehran could more easily push its units into Syria, as well as influence the Assad regime.

“Israel has no way of truly influencing the considerations of the Russian deployment in Syria,” Ya’ari said. “However, as they lower their military presence in this country, Iran’s growing grip in the region is a development to worry about. It is worth remembering that Russia, even when cooperating with Iran in Syria, has always sought to limit and shrink Iran’s foothold there and the depth of Iran’s infiltration of Assad’s army and security services.”

Jerusalem and Moscow have in recent years maintained a so-called deconfliction mechanism that works to prevent Israeli and Russian forces from clashing in Syria. Israel has waged a years-long campaign of airstrikes aimed at pro-Iranian fighters located there and at preventing the transfer of Iranian-supplied weaponry.

Prime Minister Naftali Bennett has avoided criticizing Russia directly for invading Ukraine as Israel seeks to maintain its freedom of movement in the skies of neighboring Syria, which are dominated by Russian forces.

Early on in Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, launched at the end of February, Israel sought to walk a diplomatic tightrope between Moscow and Kyiv, preserving relations with both of its allies and offering to broker talks, while supplying Ukraine with humanitarian assistance.

However, as reports have emerged of Russian atrocities in Ukraine, Israel has shifted its tone and become more outspoken in its criticism.
 

jward

passin' thru






Israel Radar
@IsraelRadar_com

2h

#Iran says engineer killed in explosion at military site (via@JasonMBrodsky ); still insists it was an "accident"


Right on schedule, more boom-boom-burns


*Parchin is famous for hosting a military complex that was under suspicion by the IAEA and Iran continiously denied inspectors access to it.



EndGameWW3
@EndGameWW3

1h

Two Iranian military experts were killed as a result of a huge explosion that took place at a military site belonging to the Iranian defense industries sector in the southeast of the capital, Tehran.
View: https://twitter.com/EndGameWW3/status/1529608190559768577?s=20&t=Ut8P_rHrXqzhFSaHaU8yZg




This is what Iran is saying about the explosion. Parchin is an Iranian military base that is tied to Iran's nuclear program.
View: https://twitter.com/EndGameWW3/status/1529611277659684866?s=20&t=Ut8P_rHrXqzhFSaHaU8yZg
 

jward

passin' thru
US official defends Iran deal but says return ‘tenuous at best’
Ali Harb

7-8 minutes


Washington, DC – Robert Malley, US President Joe Biden’s special envoy for Iran, has defended Washington’s efforts to return to the 2015 nuclear deal with Tehran, but he acknowledged that prospects of restoring the agreement are “tenuous at best”.
Testifying before the United States Congress on Wednesday, Malley stressed that the multilateral pact, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), “was working” until Washington withdrew from it in 2018 under then-President Donald Trump.

Malley said the Biden administration will continue to pursue a deal as long as it assesses that the non-proliferation benefits of an agreement are worth the sanction relief that Iran would receive.
“Of course as I speak to you, we do not have a deal and prospects for reaching one are tenuous at best,” Malley told lawmakers. “If Iran maintains demands that we go beyond the scope of the JCPOA, we will continue to reject them and there will be no deal.”
The US diplomat was likely referring to Iran’s demand for removing its Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) from Washington’s list of “foreign terrorist organizations” (FTO).

Hours prior to Malley’s appearance before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Wednesday, the Biden administration announced new sanctions against what it said was an “international oil smuggling and money laundering network” linked to the IRGC’s Quds Force, which is responsible for the group’s foreign operations.

Robert Malley
Robert Malley suggests Iran’s ‘extraneous demands’ are halting the return to the JCPOA [File: Florian Schroetter/AP Photo]
Trump’s administration, which nixed the JCPOA in 2018, labelled the IRGC as an FTO in the first such move targeting a branch of another country’s military.

Now Iran wants that designation revoked as part of reviving the nuclear agreement, but Biden and his top aides appear to be holding firm in keeping the IRGC on the blacklist.
On Tuesday, a report by Politico said the US president had made a “final” determination against reversing the IRGC’s “terror” designation and informed Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett of the decision during a call last month.
Bennett, a vocal opponent of the JCPOA, appeared to confirm the report later and thanked Biden for what he called “this principled decision”.

Americas Coverage Newsletter
US politics, Canada’s multiculturalism, South America's geopolitical rise—we bring you the stories that matter.
“I welcome the decision by the US Administration to keep Iran’s IRGC on the Foreign Terrorist Organizations list — which is where it belongs,” the Israeli prime minister wrote on Twitter.
I welcome the decision by the US Administration to keep Iran’s IRGC on the Foreign Terrorist Organizations list — which is where it belongs.
Thank you to @POTUS @JoeBiden for this principled decision and for being a true friend of the State of Israel.

— Naftali Bennett בנט (@naftalibennett) May 24, 2022
On Wednesday, Malley said the IRGC designation is outside the scope of the nuclear deal, and if Iran wants it removed, it must give concessions beyond the nuclear file.
“We’d made clear to Iran that if they wanted any concession on something that was unrelated to the JCPOA – like the FTO designation – we needed something reciprocal from them that would address our concerns,” Malley said.
“Iran has made the decision that it’s not prepared to take the reciprocal steps; they have to decide now, are they prepared to reach a deal without extraneous demands.”

He declined to reveal what Washington has asked of Tehran to remove the IRGC’s “terror” label.
The 2015 nuclear pact saw Iran scale back its nuclear programme in exchange for the lifting of international sanctions against its economy.
After Trump withdrew from the agreement in 2018 his administration launched a “maximum pressure” campaign of sanctions against Iran. In turn, the Iranian government started escalating its nuclear programme well beyond the limits set by the JCPOA.
The Biden administration has maintained that it is willing to restore the deal through “mutual compliance”, committing to remove sanctions related to Iran’s nuclear programme while also maintaining penalties targeting Iranian officials and institutions over what it calls “terrorism” and human rights abuses.

Still, some proponents of diplomacy argue that the IRGC designation should fall under the JCPOA because the Iranian military branch was blacklisted as part of Trump’s “maximum pressure” campaign after he left the deal.

A ‘middle path’?
Ryan Costello, policy director at the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), a Washington, DC-based group in favour of restoring the nuclear agreement, said the position that Malley articulated on Wednesday does not match Bennett’s tweet that proclaimed a final US decision on the IRGC issue.
“That seems a bit contrary to the tweet yesterday that it’s just not going to be lifted and the Politico report that Biden has ruled out lifting the designation,” Costello told Al Jazeera. “There may still be some kind of a middle path approach.”
He said possible solutions may include lifting the designation if Iran agrees to broader regional talks or removing the IRGC from the FTO list while keeping the Quds Force blacklisted.

Still, Costello said the Biden administration has “fallen into the political trap” set by Trump and his allies when they added the IRGC to the “terror list” with the aim of making a return to the nuclear deal more difficult.
Costello noted that US officials have acknowledged that the designation does not have a strong effect on the IRGC.
“As a practical matter, the designation does not really gain you much because there are myriad other sanctions on the IRGC,” Secretary of State Antony Blinken told Congress last month.



Amid this impasse, indirect US-Iranian talks to restore the nuclear agreement have been on ice for weeks, despite European and Qatari diplomatic efforts to push for a solution.
On Wednesday, several hawkish lawmakers urged Malley to walk away from the talks. Republicans and some leading Democrats – namely Bob Menendez, the chair of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations – also grilled the envoy over what they see as shortcomings of the JCPOA, including the agreement’s failure to address Iran’s ballistic missile programme and regional activities.

But other lawmakers advised Malley to push on with the negotiations and secure an agreement.
For his part, Malley argued that the US is better off with the deal than without it, stressing that “maximum pressure” led to removing the curbs on Iran’s nuclear programme while making other issues, like Tehran’s support for regional proxies, even worse.
 

jward

passin' thru
First Squawk
@FirstSquawk


U.S. CONFISCATES IRANIAN OIL CARGO ON TANKER OFF GREEK ISLAND OF EVIA –SOURCES


5:15 AM · May 26, 2022·Twitter Web App

SEIZED IRANIAN OIL CARGO TRANSFERRED ON TO ANOTHER TANKER, WILL SAIL TO THE U.S. –SOURCES

 

jward

passin' thru







Mike
@Doranimated

3h

What about Iran? One interpretation is that the White House is using petty crap like the Red Sea islands to create a semblance of US strategic cooperation with traditional allies (KSA, Egypt, Israel) while it crams the Iran deal down their throats. If this interpretation is =>
View: https://twitter.com/Doranimated/status/1529767515068542976?s=20&t=AXluOl3MwBIV47Q1ifFKIA

correct, then keeping the IRGC on the terror list is just window dressing. It allows Bennett & Lapid to pretend before Israelis that they are influencing Biden even as he sells them out to Iran. We’ll see. Alternatively, the deal might be comatose. That is preferable. But if
the deal comes back next week, rest assured that all this “diplomacy” and talk of Saudi-Israel normalization is BS designed to sell this abominable deal.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
What about Iran? One interpretation is that the White House is using petty crap like the Red Sea islands to create a semblance of US strategic cooperation with traditional allies (KSA, Egypt, Israel) while it crams the Iran deal down their throats. If this interpretation is correct, then keeping the IRGC on the terror list is just window dressing. It allows Bennett & Lapid to pretend before Israelis that they are influencing Biden even as he sells them out to Iran. We’ll see. Alternatively, the deal might be comatose. That is preferable. But if the deal comes back next week, rest assured that all this “diplomacy” and talk of Saudi-Israel normalization is BS designed to sell this abominable deal.


great point. I guess it's wait and see time. I personally think it's dead. I think Iran told them to pound sand and now they are trying to save face by pretending it was their idea to not move forward....

HD
 
Last edited:

jward

passin' thru

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
U.S. intelligence shows Iran threats on U.S. soil, but Blinken and Schiff say this shouldn't derail new nuclear deal
By Margaret Brennan

Updated on: March 12, 2022 / 1:28 PM / CBS News
Biden administration faces bipartisan push for Russian oil ban amid record-breaking gas prices




The U.S. intelligence community has assessed that Iran will threaten Americans — both directly and via proxy attacks — and that Tehran remains committed to developing networks inside the U.S., according to the intelligence community's 2022 Annual Threat Assessment, published Tuesday by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI).
Now, with the U.S. on the cusp of a diplomatic accord with Iran over its nuclear program, as well as a potential deal regarding the release of four American prisoners, it is not clear whether the Biden administration can extract any further concessions or convince Tehran to cease its other malign activities, including any on U.S. soil.

CBS News has obtained two persistent threat assessments submitted to Congress by the State Department in January 2022 which cited a "serious and credible threat" on the lives of former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and former Trump administration Iran envoy Brian Hook. These non-public assessments show that throughout 2021, and again in 2022, the State Department assessed the need to provide round-the-clock, U.S.-taxpayer funded diplomatic security details to both men.
Click here to view related media.




According to another report marked sensitive but unclassified and obtained by CBS News, U.S. taxpayers are paying more than $2 million a month to protect Pompeo and Hook. The projected costs include vehicle and travel costs as well as salary and pay for the agents working for the State Department's Bureau of Diplomatic Security. The document was first reported by The Associated Press.

The hefty security entourage that continues to travel with Pompeo, a potential 2024 Republican presidential candidate, has garnered attention during his public appearances including at the recent Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC). The size of the detail rivals one that is typical for a current cabinet member.

The most recent threat assessment signed by Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Brian McKeon cites a determination made as of July 16, 2021 that Pompeo faced such threats "from a foreign power or the agent of a foreign power." McKeon also said he had determined on at least three occasions that a specific threat to former envoy Hook required security, most recently in November 2021.

Two current and three former U.S. officials confirmed that Iran is the foreign actor, but details of the specific threats were not described in the assessments provided to Congress. The Free Beacon first reported the existence of the non-public threat assessment.

The FBI also thwarted an Iranian intelligence network plot to kidnap New York-based journalist Maseh Alinejad, and Tehran is threatening current U.S. officials, which was acknowledged publicly by the intelligence community on Tuesday. The ODNI report said that the threat to current officials was in retaliation for the U.S. drone strike that killed Iran's most powerful military general, Commander Qasem Soleimani, in January 2020, and that Iran "has previously attempted to conduct lethal operations in the United States."


On "Face the Nation" this past Sunday, Secretary of State Antony Blinken sidestepped a question about whether a renewed diplomatic agreement with Iran regarding its nuclear program would also address threats on U.S. soil, including any targeting his predecessor, Mike Pompeo, who was secretary of state when the assassination strike against Soleimani took place. Blinken instead addressed the broad threat posed to U.S. personnel from Iranian malign actors, saying, "We will stand and act against those every single day."

The secretary has previously said that Iran is weeks away from obtaining enough fissile material for a nuclear bomb, hence the U.S. attempts to revive the 2015 international agreement known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which would lift sanctions on Iran in exchange for a temporary cap on its nuclear development. President Trump exited the JCPOA in 2018 by sanctioning Iran, and in July 2019, Iran began nuclear-related activities that exceeded limits of that agreement. The intelligence community assesses that if Iran does not win sanctions relief, then it will proceed with enriching nuclear fuel to weapons grade material.

"We were very clear when we were in the deal originally that nothing about the deal prevents us from taking action against Iran when it's engaged in actions that threaten us, threaten our allies and partners. That will very much continue," Blinken said.

House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff agrees that the threats do not have to be addressed in any renewed nuclear-related deal with Iran.


"These other malign activities of Iran's, their plots against the U.S. personnel or Americans around the world we can deal with and have to deal with separately, and we should deal with them aggressively," Schiff told CBS News' "Face the Nation" on Sunday. "We need to go after all of this, not necessarily in one agreement."

The Biden administration has been explicit about its commitment to one specific issue outside the parameters of Iran's nuclear program, though, and that is the fate of four Americans imprisoned in Iran. Last month, U.S. Special Envoy for Iran Robert Malley told Reuters that a nuclear deal is unlikely without their release. Iran has insisted on the unfreezing of billions of dollars in state assets sitting in bank accounts in U.S. ally South Korea in exchange for the release of imprisoned Westerners.


Iran: Crisis In The Middle East

Iraq Attack
U.S. sanctions Iranians after ballistic missile strikes in Iraq, Gulf states


ISRAEL-US-ARAB-DIPLOMACY
Israel hosts Blinken, top Arab diplomats as Mideast dynamic shifts


Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe detained
Iran releases 2 British citizens jailed for over 5 years


IRAQ-ERBIL-MISSILE ATTACK
After missile strike, Iran says it won't tolerate "threats" from Iraq

More
Margaret Brennan
Margaret Brennan is moderator of CBS News' "Face The Nation" and CBS News' senior foreign affairs correspondent based in Washington, D.C.

Follow the money......
 

jward

passin' thru

..no "new" in this news, but still. . .
Save a lil hate n place on "the lists" for this fool


ACLJ Obtains New Memo in State Department Lawsuit Unveiling Unreported Obama-Era Officials' Secret Meeting With Iran's Zarif During Trump Administration
By
Jordan Sekulow
|
May 24
5 min read
Government Corruption
The Boston Globe put it this way: “Kerry is quietly seeking to salvage Iran deal he helped craft.”
The ACLJ put it a bit more bluntly: “John Kerry tried to undermine President Trump in order to support Iran, putting our national security at risk.”
Remember the stories that former Obama Secretary of State John Kerry – no longer in office as of January 20, 2017 – engaged in shadow diplomacy with Iran promoting foreign policy contrary to that of America’s sitting President, Donald Trump? As the story continued to unfold, and more information about the Left’s counter-diplomacy was revealed even just last year, the ACLJ went to work.

We launched a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the State Department, seeking records of State Department awareness of or involvement with Obama-era U.S. officials – aka, the Deep State – employing undercover backchannels in an effort to undercut President Trump’s cornerstone foreign policy of withdrawing the United States from the disastrous Obama/Biden Iran Deal.
In the FOIA lawsuit against the State Department that ensued, the ACLJ just obtained a never-before-seen “unclassified” October 2018 memo entitled, “Notes From ‘Iran and the US: An Off-the-Record Conversation with Foreign Minister Mohamad Javad Zarif.’”
According to this memo, the previously unreported “off-the-record meeting” took place at the “Iranian Ambassador’s Residence, NYC,” on October 4, 2018 – just days after major media coverage of Kerry’s admission of the secret efforts. The memo we unearthed contains notes on the former U.S. diplomats’ conversation with Zarif and his responses “to questions posed by a group of US former ambassadors and policy analysts.”

The key here is “former” – and the date, October 2018, right in the middle of the Trump Administration.
The newly obtained memo, regarding the secret meeting between Zarif and these former U.S. officials, included discussions of nuclear weapons, potential prisoner swaps, Afghanistan withdrawal and negotiations with the Taliban, Houthi rebels, Syria, Suleimani’s popularity in Iran, and the “region in turmoil.”
Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo – now ACLJ Senior Counsel for Global Affairs – reviewed this memo and reacted by calling this discovery “a big deal for sure.” He continued: “This is exactly what we were fighting. . . . The arrogance. The indecency. The hatred of Israel.”

This is precisely why we sent this FOIA request: to uncover actions of then-former U.S. diplomats – those who worked for the Obama-Biden Administration but who then went to work undermining President Trump and the core policies he campaigned on and succeeded. Kerry himself admitted his part in this scheme. And here we obtained a memo showing just that: an off-the-record meeting between Zarif and “former” U.S. diplomats right in the middle of the Trump Administration and during the time President Trump was working through the aftermath of withdrawing the United States from the farce known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) – the Iran nuclear deal.

Further, this record was only responsive to our FOIA request if it involved former high level Obama officials John Kerry, Robert Malley (key Iran Deal negotiator and currently President Biden’s U.S. Special Representative to Iran), or Ernest Moniz (Obama’s Secretary of Energy) in some way. This in and of itself is a key piece of this shadow diplomacy puzzle.
In the ACLJ’s FOIA request sent to the State Department last year, we sought records of these former high level Obama officials engaged in secret, “off the record” diplomacy with Iran, and particularly, with Mohammad Javad Zarif. To be specific, we sought:
All records, communications or briefings created, generated, forwarded, transmitted, sent, shared, saved, received, or reviewed by any DOS official or employee that regard in any way John Kerry, Robert Malley, or Ernest Moniz, and Mohammad Javad Zarif or U.S. relations with Iran.
When the State Department ignored our requests, failing to comply with the law, we took it to federal court in Washington, D.C., as we’ve done so many times before.
There are many more documents to be produced in this case; and once the production is complete, we’ll have to litigate against the State Department to force it to reveal what it has redacted and withheld along the way.
One question we will pursue: In whose custody was this memo? Another one is, what conversations did Obama-era holdovers still at the State Department have with the “former” U.S. diplomats who went to this meeting?
The memo we uncovered shines a light, not just on the secret meeting itself, but also on Zarif’s rhetoric and unbelievable assertions as he attempts to persuade his listeners. For instance, he claims “Iran will never seek atomic weapons.” Well, I guess there’s no cause for concern here. And, “It is almost impossible to turn fuel rods into nuclear weapons.” Almost impossible. He goes on and on, spouting off his distorted pro-Iran view as if it’s fact.

Interestingly, record productions we’ve received in this case also include a series of sensitive but unclassified (SBU) emails revealing that Kerry had State Department staff working to send correspondence to Zarif, described as a farewell letter, two weeks after Kerry had left office on January 20, 2017. It is clear from the emails that the State Department staff were struggling with how to send the letter, we presume because the United States had no official diplomatic relations with Iran.
As of now, the State Department has withheld the contents of Kerry’s secret February 2017 letter to Zarif, so we will continue to litigate to gain access.
We will keep you up to date as this case progresses.
 

danielboon

TB Fanatic
here we go









EndGameWW3

@EndGameWW3

·
12m

Update: Iran/Greece...
Quote Tweet






Wa9zjOZI_mini.jpg


Iran International English

@IranIntl_En
· 27m
#BREAKING The Iranian military has seized the Greek-flagged oil tanker Delta Poseidon in international waters while the vessel was navigating through Persian Gulf en route for Greece, industry sources told @LloydsList. twitter.com/IranIntl_En/st…
 

danielboon

TB Fanatic
now they have 2
EndGameWW3

@EndGameWW3

·
14m

Update: Iran going for broke damn...
Quote Tweet






Wa9zjOZI_mini.jpg


Iran International English

@IranIntl_En
· 24m
#BREAKING A second Greek-flagged oil tanker, Prudent Warrior, has also been seized by the Iranian military, according to @LloydsList. The seizure of the two vessels comes in response to Greece's move to seize an Iranian tanker and letting the US confiscate its crude oil.
 

danielboon

TB Fanatic
oh boy
US Seizes Russia-Flagged Tanker Full Of Iranian Oil Near Greece
Tyler Durden's Photo

BY TYLER DURDEN
FRIDAY, MAY 27, 2022 - 06:30 AM
Authored by Jason Ditz via AntiWar.com,
Fresh off of the US targeting a series of companies involved in an Iran-linked oil smuggling network, the US has now seized an oil tanker near Greece, taking the Iranian oil within to be sent to the US.
The oil was on a Russian-operated ship, which had been singled out for US targeting in February. It was then called the Pegas. The company renamed the ship the Lana and was Russian flagged. Greece had impounded the Pegas and its Russian crew last month over the invasion of Ukraine, but ultimately released it.
The Russian-flagged oil tanker Pegas previously shown off Turkey, via Reuters
Neither the US nor Russia is commenting. Greece says the US informed them the oil was Iranian, and that the US hired a different ship to take the oil to America. Iran has summoned the Greek charges d’affaires and called the incident a "clear example of piracy."
The US accused the tanker of loading 700,000 Bbls of oil from Iran in August 2021. The tanker mostly sent oil to China.
Earlier in the week The Maritime Executive detailed that "The story of a shadowy Russian oil tanker took a new turn... as the U.S. Department of Justice seized the oil aboard the vessel and according to reports is in the process of transferring the oil to the United States on a chartered tanker."
"The vessel was detained nearly seven weeks ago in Greece when authorities thought it was covered by the European Union sanctions on Russian assets, but later held for mechanical deficiencies while watchdog groups announced that it was actually smuggling sanctioned Iranian oil."
The report continued: "The Aframax tanker arrived off Greece early in April with reports of a possible mechanical failure and indications that they were looking for assistance to make repairs to continue their voyage. When she anchored south of the Greek island of Evia the 115,520 dwt tanker was being identified as the Russian-flagged Pegas." And the initial "assumption at the time was that it was laden with a Russian crude oil cargo," according to the report.
The seizure of the tanker, and oil, comes amid tensions on the ongoing nuclear talks. Iran believes, and not unfairly, that the oil was just stolen from them, and the US position, while yet to be public, is that the oil is now theirs.
It’s not a great precedent, but generally Iran can’t do much about it, and the US is keen to have the oil.
 

jward

passin' thru
EndGameWW3
@EndGameWW3

11m

Update: Lloyd's List Shipping website: One of the two ships seized by Iran carried a cargo of oil from Iraq and was heading to the United States.
Lloyd List: The Prudent Warrior tanker seized by Iran carries oil from Iraq to America
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
This article is from Wed - describing the Iranian boat seized by Greece. There was a ship seized in April also, I am going to post an article about that below.

(fair use applies)

Bolding mine

Iran denounces Greek seizure of Iranian ship as 'maritime piracy'
Iran’s foreign ministry called the seizure of the ship an act of international piracy

By News Desk - May 25 2022

Iran has protested to the government of Greece over the detention of an Iranian-flagged ship near the Greek coast on 25 May.

The ship’s cargo was seized by a court order in coordination with the US governme
nt, according to local media reports.
The tanker, which had been sailing the #Russian flag since April 8 changed its flag, sailing under #Iran's, knowing that the #EuropeanUnion, unlike the #US, has not imposed sanctions on Iranian oil. Greece seizes ship sailing under Iranian flag
— Al Mayadeen English (@MayadeenEnglish) May 25, 2022

Iran’s foreign ministry summoned the Greek embassy chargé d’affaires in Tehran to say that “the seizure of the cargo constitutes maritime piracy, and the responsibility lies with the Greek government.”

Iran’s Ports and Maritime Authority said that the vessel had to stop in Greek waters due to bad weather conditions and technical problems. However, the ship did not receive assistance and was instead seized by the Greek government.

The oil tanker, which had been sailing under the Russian flag since 8 April, was sailing under the Iranian flag with Greek maritime territory, as the European Union, unlike the US, has not imposed sanctions on Iranian oil.

Greek media outlet, Kathimerini, reported that the US ordered Greek judicial authorities to seize the cargo and conduct an investigation.

Earlier this month, Al Mayadeen reported that Greek authorities have been holding an Iranian oil tanker since 20 April.

This incident is the latest in a series of similar ones over the past few years, due to economic sanctions imposed by the US in 2018.

Fars news agency has estimated that between seven and 10 million liters of crude oil and diesel were smuggled out of Iran last year.

On 15 April, Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) seized a foreign-flagged vessel carrying smuggled fuel into the Gulf and arrested its seven crew members.

Quoted by the state news agency IRNA, Gholam Hossein Hosseini, a public relations official of the IRGC said: “During the investigation, 250,000 liters of smuggled fuel were discovered.”

On November 2021, the IRGC launched a special operation in the waters near Hormuz in the Gulf of Oman, seizing a vessel loaded with fuel stolen by US forces. Washington has denied all the accusations.

On November 2020, UK forces captured an Iranian oil tanker in waters near Gibraltar, and in retaliation, Iran seized a British cargo vessel.

Tehran has repeatedly denounced US sanctions, which prohibit it from extracting and exporting fossil fuels.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Two laden Greek tankers seized by Iranian forces
Suezmaxes Delta Poseidon and Prudent Warrior boarded in the Middle East Gulf and escorted to Iranian anchorage
Nigel Lowry
27 May 2022

Incidents emerge on Friday amid spat between Tehran and Athens over US seizure of Iranian oil cargo off Russian tanker held in Greek port

TWO GREEK oil tankers have been boarded in international waters by Iranian military personnel while navigating through the Middle East Gulf.

Industry sources confirmed that in two seemingly similar operations the suezmaxes Delta Poseidon (IMO: 9468671) and Prudent Warrior (IMO: 9753545), both under Greek flag, were approached by Iranian helicopters on Friday afternoon.

They were both boarded by military personnel and later escorted by naval vessels from international traffic lanes to Iranian waters a few miles off the coast.


Iranian military boards Greek tanker

Vessel tracking data from Lloyd’s List Intelligence shows the last AIS signals recorded by Delta Poseidon and Prudent Warrior, which were seized by Iranian forces on Friday (May 27).

A spokesperson at Polembros Shipping in Greece, the manager of the 2017-built Prudent Warrior, said the company had lost communication with the vessel. It had a crew of 24 Greeks and Filipinos on board.

Polembros has since learned from other Greek vessels in the vicinity that the tanker is now at an anchorage about 11 miles off the Iranian coast, he said.

The vessel had loaded at Basrah, Iraq, and is carrying an oil cargo for the US.

Delta Poseidon had also loaded at the same Iraqi port.

According to Lloyd’s List Intelligence, its destination was Agioi Theodoroi near Corinth and the cargo is understood to be for the Motor Oil refinery located there.

Delta Poseidon, which has a crew of 25 on board, is part of the fleet of Greece-based Delta Tankers. The company has been approached for comment.

Greece’s shipping ministry has been informed of the incidents.

The incidents occur at the end of a week that saw the US seize a cargo of Iranian crude oil from a Russian tanker held in Greece.

Tehran decried the move as “international robbery.”

According to state news agency Irna, Iran’s foreign ministry summoned the chargé d’affaires of the Greek embassy in Tehran to protest the move, calling it “a clear act of piracy”.

Iran has also protested to the envoy of Switzerland in Tehran, which represents US interests there, over the seizure in Greece of the cargo from the aframax Lana (IMO: 9256860), formerly named Pegas.

One industry source told Lloyd’s List: “we have to wait and see what the Iranians want but everyone, including security forces in the region, think this is a case of tit-for-tat.”
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
This article is about the Russian ship with Iranian oil seized back in April, not the one seized on Wed of this week. Two ships seized by Greece, Iran seizes two Greek ships. definitely a tit for tat....


(fair use applies)


US seizes Iranian crude from Russian tanker arrested in Greece
Dynacom-owned tanker Ice Energy started a ship-to-ship transfer with the Lana in Greek waters four miles off the coast of Karistos on Monday afternoon
Richard Meade
23 May 2022

George Procopiou’s Dynacom has been hired to transfer US-sanctioned Iranian crude from the Russian-flagged tanker Lana, detained in April by Greek authorities on the basis of Russian sanctions, and transfer the oil to the US

THE US government has seized a cargo of Iranian crude oil from a Russia-flagged tanker being held in Greek waters and chartered a Greek-owned tanker to transport the oil back to the US.

The Russia-flagged aframax Lana (IMO: 9256860), formerly named Pegas, was detained on April 15 by Greek authorities and had been waiting at Karistos port pending a court ruling.

On Monday afternoon a Dynacom-owned tanker Ice Energy (IMO: 9301732) started a ship-to-ship transfer with the Lana in Greek waters four miles off the coast of Karistos. The operation, first reported by US lobby group United Against Iran on Twitter, was verified using Lloyd's List Intelligence data.

Lloyd’s List understands that the George Procopiou-controlled tanker has been chartered by the US Department of Justice to transfer the oil to the US.

The US Department of Justice was not available to comment on the operation.

The US practice of seizing sanctioned cargos from vessels has proved controversial inside the maritime insurance community and sparked several legal challenges in similar cases.

While the details of this case are yet to be made public, the US has previously argued that such seizures were legal when linked to a US-sanctioned Iranian terrorist group, giving them jurisdiction to act in international waters.

The move to seize Lana’s cargo ends weeks of speculation over how the Greek detention would play out. The 2003-built aframax Lana was originally detained on April 15 based on the vessel’s former Russian ownership, not its Iranian cargo.

The seizure notice was later withdrawn as the new registered owner was not on any European Union sanctions list.

The vessel was owned by Russia’s Promsvyazbank and registered to the bank’s financial subsidiary, PSB Leasing, according to Lloyd’s List Intelligence data.

Its registered ownership and ISM management was then changed to TransMorFlot in March, while beneficial owner has changed to Jamaldin Pashaev, a Russian national.

The US designated Promsvyazbank and its 42 subsidiaries on February 22 in a move designed to thwart Russian action in Ukraine. On March 2, the European Council said it would prohibit Swift financial messaging services to the bank and six others, along with capital market restrictions following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on February 24.

There were no legal grounds to impound the ship following checks and the coast guard had been ordered by the anti-money laundering authority to release the vessel, Reuters reported, citing official Greek sources. No further details were provided and no date was given for its departure.

According to Lloyd’s List Intelligence data, the vessel had been expected at the Marmara terminal in Turkey in January, and the vessel ended up in Greek waters unintentionally.

Following engine failure, the vessel was being towed when inclement weather forced it to anchor at the port of Karistos. Several other deficiencies were found upon inspection.

Lloyd’s List understands that the mechanical failures of the ship were the reason behind the US DoJ’s decision to charter Dynacom’s Ice Energy to transfer the cargo and transfer it to the US.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

US signals renewed sanctions crackdown against Iran
Washington is ready to tighten sanctions on Iran and shipping will be targeted
Richard Meade - Analysis
26 May 2022

A US crackdown against a Moscow-backed Iranian oil smuggling network offers a window on the sanctions strategy in Washington. The takeaway for shipping is that enforcement against subterfuge oil networks is likely to be stepped up as nuclear talks collapse.

[SUBSCRIPTION REQUIRED TO READ THE REST OF THE ARTICLE]
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Sensitive Iranian Military Site Was Targeted in Attack
A drone exploded at a structure in the Parchin military technology complex on Wednesday. The attack fit a pattern of past Israeli strikes on Iran.
By Farnaz Fassihi and Ronen Bergman
May 27, 2022, 12:29 p.m. ET

A drone strike this week targeted a highly sensitive military site outside Tehran where Iran develops missile, nuclear and drone technology, according to three Iranians with knowledge of the attack and to a U.S. official.

The strike on Wednesday evening hit the site of the Parchin military complex, about 37 miles southeast of the capital, with quadcopter suicide drones, according to the Iranian sources, who were not authorized to speak publicly. The drones exploded into a building used by the Ministry of Defense for research on drone development, killing a young engineer who worked at the ministry and injuring another person, they said.

There was no immediate claim of responsibility, but the attack fit a pattern of past Israeli strikes on Iran and Lebanon in a covert campaign of hostility that has been going on for years. A statement from Iran’s Ministry of Defense indicated that it viewed this as an attack, not an accident.

Israeli officials refused to comment. A U.S. official confirmed that suicide drones had attacked Parchin but did not say who was behind it or offer any further details.

On Sunday, just a few days before the strike on Parchin, a colonel in the Revolutionary Guards was gunned down in Tehran, and Israel told the United States that it was behind his killing, according to one intelligence official. The Israelis intended it as a warning to Iran to stop targeting Israeli citizens abroad, the official said.

Israel and Iran are increasingly pushing the boundaries in their long-running clandestine war, and the targeting of a drone research facility at Parchin follows a pattern of Israel trying to counter Iran’s growing drone capabilities.

In recent years, Iran has steadily advanced in its design and production of drones and transfer of drone technology and parts to proxy militias across the Middle East. Iranian drones have been deployed in numerous attacks against Israel, as well as in Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Yemen, and, last October, a U.S. base in Syria, according to intelligence officials.

Israel considers the use of drones by its enemies, especially Iran, as a major threat to its security because drones can evade Israel’s advanced antimissile systems like the Iron Dome. A senior Israeli military official said the country was investing significant resources to locate and destroy enemy drones.

In early February, Israel sent six quadcopter drones containing explosives into a facility near the city of Kermanshah that was Iran’s main manufacturing and storage plant for military drones, according to a senior intelligence official briefed on the operation.

That Israeli attack destroyed dozens of Iran’s drones. Iran retaliated by firing ballistic missiles at a housing complex in northern Iraq that it said had been used by Israeli agents to plot attacks against Iran.

In June 2021, another attack using a quadcopter drone — which explodes on impact — was also launched from within the country. It struck the Iran Centrifuge Technology Company, or TESA, in the city of Karaj. TESA is one of Iran’s main manufacturing centers for the production of the advanced centrifuges used at the country’s two nuclear facilities, Natanz and Fardow.

In the face of longstanding suspicions that its nuclear program is aimed at producing weapons, Iran has insisted it is for peaceful purposes only. The United Nations’ watchdog has said it has not found proof that Iran is developing nuclear weapons.

The drone attack on Wednesday was launched from inside Iran, not far from the Parchin military base, according to the Iranian sources with knowledge of the attack. Quadcopter drones have a short flight range, and Parchin is a long way from Iran’s borders.

This would not be the first time that Israel had used operatives inside Iran to carry out attacks.

A statement by Iran’s Ministry of Defense on Thursday used the word “incident” instead of “accident” to describe what happened at Parchin and called the engineer who died a “martyr,” a clear indication that his death was viewed as a result of an enemy action. The statement said one of the research units of the Defense Ministry in the Parchin area was hit.

Several well-known social media accounts affiliated with the Revolutionary Guards, including that of the military analyst Hossein Dalirian, also posted that the engineer was a “martyr.”

The senior editor of the conservative Iranian news site Tabnnak, Mostafa Najafi, said in a Twitter post on Thursday that he later deleted: “Israel attacked a ministry of defense facility with a few suicide quadcopter drones.”

In 2011, the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, or I.A.E.A., said that some countries were suspicious that Iran had experimented with developing nuclear weapons at Parchin. The agency’s inspectors gained access to the site in 2015.

Photographs that Israeli officials said were stolen from Iran’s nuclear archive in 2018 appear to show a giant metal chamber in a building at the Parchin military site that was built to conduct high-explosive experiments, needed for the assembly of a nuclear warhead.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

New York Times report: Attack on Iranian military facility was carried out by a drone
Officials say Parchin military technology complex was hit by a drone and resembled past attacks attributed to Israel.
Elad Benari, Canada
27.05.22 20:28

Iran


The explosion that occurred this week at a structure in the Parchin military technology complex in Iran was hit by a drone, The New York Times reported on Friday.

Three Iranians with knowledge of the attack and a US official told the newspaper that the drone strike targeted a highly sensitive military site.

The strike on Wednesday evening hit the site of the Parchin military complex, located about 37 miles southeast of the capital, with quadcopter suicide drones, according to the Iranian sources, who were not authorized to speak publicly.
The drones exploded into a building used by the Ministry of Defense for research on drone development, killing a young engineer who worked at the ministry and injuring another person, they said.

While there was no immediate claim of responsibility, The New York Times said that the attack fit a pattern of past strikes on Iran and Lebanon attributed to Israel.

Israeli officials refused to comment. A US official confirmed that suicide drones had attacked Parchin but did not say who was behind it or offer any further details.

The drone attack was launched from inside Iran, not far from the Parchin military base, according to the Iranian sources with knowledge of the attack. Quadcopter drones have a short flight range, and Parchin is a long way from Iran’s borders.

A statement by Iran’s Ministry of Defense on Thursday used the word “incident” instead of “accident” to describe what happened at Parchin and called the engineer who died a “martyr,” a clear indication that his death was viewed as a result of an enemy action. The statement said one of the research units of the Defense Ministry in the Parchin area was hit.
In June 2020, an explosion occurred at the Parchin military site, but it was not clear what caused it.

In 2011, the International Atomic Energy Agency said that some countries were suspicious that Iran had experimented with developing nuclear weapons at Parchin.

Satellite footage from 2012 showed that Iran was carrying out clean-up activity at Parchin, where it was suspected Iran may have conducted high explosive compression related to the development of nuclear weapons.

Iran initially refused to allow IAEA inspectors access to Parchin, but IAEA inspectors eventually gained access to the site in 2015.
 
Top