WAR CHINA THREATENS TO INVADE TAIWAN

northern watch

TB Fanatic
China Is Hoarding Crude Again, And That’s Great News For Oil Prices
By Alex Kimani - Sep 02, 2021, 7:00 PM CDT
Oil price

After recording the worst monthly loss this year in August, the oil markets have kicked off trading in September on a much brighter note on a trifecta of positive developments. Crude oil prices have been inching up after OPEC+ agreed to keep its current production agreement in place, in effect maintaining the 400K bbl/day hike scheduled for October, thus signaling that the markets are healthier than earlier feared. Reuters has also reported that OPEC+ will raise its 2022 oil demand growth forecast to 4.2M bbl/day from its previous outlook of 3.28M bbl/day.

Meanwhile, the latest data by the Energy Information Administration (EIA) shows that U.S. crude oil inventories fell much more than expected last week despite domestic production climbing to a 15-month-high. U.S. crude stockpiles fell by 7.2M barrels to 425.4M barrels, ~6% below the five-year average.

But the most encouraging piece of news yet is that crude demand in China has started showing signs of a strong recovery after the country reopened its economy and Beijing moves closer to finalizing a probe into its independent refiners, thus allowing so-called teapots to resume importing crude.

After nearly five months of slower purchases due to a shortage of import quotas, COVID-19 lockdowns that muted fuel consumption and drawdowns from high inventories, demand for spot crude by the world's biggest importer of the commodity is now on a recovery path.

Lockdowns easing

Since April, weak consumption in China as well as a sharp drop in China's refining output to 14-month lows have depressed the prices of staple crude grades from West Africa and Brazil to multi-month lows.

But analysts are now saying that Chinese crude importers are ramping up purchases and even paying higher premiums to secure supplies from November onwards thanks to lockdown restrictions easing.


Source: Bloomberg

About a month ago, authorities in Beijing reimposed massive lockdowns by curtailing public transport and taxi services in 144 of the worst-hit areas by the delta variant nationwide, including train service and subway usage in Beijing.

That seemed like overkill, with less than 1,000 cases of the delta virus reported nationwide and a good 61% of the population already fully vaccinated. However, Beijing opted to employ its tried-and-tested method of targeted lockdown that has been successful in stopping no less than 30 Covid-19 flare-ups in the past. The capital city of Beijing implemented quarantines for visitors from high-risk areas, halted the use of community spaces for entertainment, and also limited the number of visitors allowed at parks and scenic areas.

Chinese authorities also urged people to cancel vacations and business trips, especially those from high-risk areas, and also advised college students to delay their return to school for the new semester.

"Vaccination is not equal to entering a safe or carrying a talisman. Personal protective measures still cannot be relaxed and vaccination cannot replace containment measures. Let's hold on until we score the ultimate victory against the outbreak," Qi Jinli, deputy director of Beijing's Covid-19 response taskforce, said at the time.

Well, it appears that Beijing has come out on top, once again.

"The developments out of China are reigniting expectations that oil demand would start to rise again," said Phil Flynn, senior market analyst at Price Futures Group Inc. has told Bloomberg.

Return of the teapots

Three months ago, in a dramatic reversal of fortunes, Beijing announced huge cutbacks in import quotas for the country's private oil refiners. According to Reuters, China's independent refiners were awarded a combined 35.24 million tons in crude oil import quotas in the second batch of quotas this year, a 35% reduction from 53.88 million tons for a similar tranche a year ago.

The big reduction came as part of a government crackdown on private Chinese refiners known as teapots, which have become increasingly dominant over the past five years. This was intended to allow Beijing to more precisely regulate the flow of foreign oil as it doubles down on malpractices such as tax evasion, fuel smuggling, and violations of environmental and emissions rules by independent refiners.

The move was also intended to claw back control of China's crude refining sector from private refiners to state-owned refineries. And it's reminiscent of its earlier crackdown on big tech operations that were getting dangerously powerful and seen to be threatening party politics.

China's teapots have been steadily grabbing market share from entrenched state players such as China Petroleum and Chemical Corporation (NYSE:SNP), also known as Sinopec, and PetroChina Co. (NYSE:PTR) ever since Beijing partially liberalized its oil industry in 2015. Teapots currently control nearly 30% of China's crude refining volumes, up from ~10% in 2013.

But traders are now growing optimistic that Beijing will soon wrap up a probe on the teapots. Indeed, a fourth batch of quota is expected to be issued in September or October, which could revive demand from independent refiners.

Something else working in the teapots' favor is that crude stocks by China's national oil companies are very low, and private refiners could help bridge the shortfall. Imports into China's Shandong province, home to most teapots, fell below 3 million barrels in both July and August, compared with ~3.6 million barrels on average in the first half of 2021.

China's central bank has also said it will try and stabilize the supply of credit and increase the amount of money supporting smaller businesses. There are expectations for further stimulus targeting the infrastructure sector, manufacturing, and real estate after the July slowdown left the economic situation looking bleak.
By Alex Kimani for Oilprice.com

China Is Hoarding Crude Again, And That’s Great News For Oil Prices | OilPrice.com
 

northern watch

TB Fanatic
China Is Hoarding Crude Again, And That’s Great News For Oil Prices
By Alex Kimani - Sep 02, 2021, 7:00 PM CDT
Oil price

After recording the worst monthly loss this year in August, the oil markets have kicked off trading in September on a much brighter note on a trifecta of positive developments. Crude oil prices have been inching up after OPEC+ agreed to keep its current production agreement in place, in effect maintaining the 400K bbl/day hike scheduled for October, thus signaling that the markets are healthier than earlier feared. Reuters has also reported that OPEC+ will raise its 2022 oil demand growth forecast to 4.2M bbl/day from its previous outlook of 3.28M bbl/day.

Meanwhile, the latest data by the Energy Information Administration (EIA) shows that U.S. crude oil inventories fell much more than expected last week despite domestic production climbing to a 15-month-high. U.S. crude stockpiles fell by 7.2M barrels to 425.4M barrels, ~6% below the five-year average.

But the most encouraging piece of news yet is that crude demand in China has started showing signs of a strong recovery after the country reopened its economy and Beijing moves closer to finalizing a probe into its independent refiners, thus allowing so-called teapots to resume importing crude.

After nearly five months of slower purchases due to a shortage of import quotas, COVID-19 lockdowns that muted fuel consumption and drawdowns from high inventories, demand for spot crude by the world's biggest importer of the commodity is now on a recovery path.

Lockdowns easing

Since April, weak consumption in China as well as a sharp drop in China's refining output to 14-month lows have depressed the prices of staple crude grades from West Africa and Brazil to multi-month lows.

But analysts are now saying that Chinese crude importers are ramping up purchases and even paying higher premiums to secure supplies from November onwards thanks to lockdown restrictions easing.


Source: Bloomberg

About a month ago, authorities in Beijing reimposed massive lockdowns by curtailing public transport and taxi services in 144 of the worst-hit areas by the delta variant nationwide, including train service and subway usage in Beijing.

That seemed like overkill, with less than 1,000 cases of the delta virus reported nationwide and a good 61% of the population already fully vaccinated. However, Beijing opted to employ its tried-and-tested method of targeted lockdown that has been successful in stopping no less than 30 Covid-19 flare-ups in the past. The capital city of Beijing implemented quarantines for visitors from high-risk areas, halted the use of community spaces for entertainment, and also limited the number of visitors allowed at parks and scenic areas.

Chinese authorities also urged people to cancel vacations and business trips, especially those from high-risk areas, and also advised college students to delay their return to school for the new semester.

"Vaccination is not equal to entering a safe or carrying a talisman. Personal protective measures still cannot be relaxed and vaccination cannot replace containment measures. Let's hold on until we score the ultimate victory against the outbreak," Qi Jinli, deputy director of Beijing's Covid-19 response taskforce, said at the time.

Well, it appears that Beijing has come out on top, once again.

"The developments out of China are reigniting expectations that oil demand would start to rise again," said Phil Flynn, senior market analyst at Price Futures Group Inc. has told Bloomberg.

Return of the teapots

Three months ago, in a dramatic reversal of fortunes, Beijing announced huge cutbacks in import quotas for the country's private oil refiners. According to Reuters, China's independent refiners were awarded a combined 35.24 million tons in crude oil import quotas in the second batch of quotas this year, a 35% reduction from 53.88 million tons for a similar tranche a year ago.

The big reduction came as part of a government crackdown on private Chinese refiners known as teapots, which have become increasingly dominant over the past five years. This was intended to allow Beijing to more precisely regulate the flow of foreign oil as it doubles down on malpractices such as tax evasion, fuel smuggling, and violations of environmental and emissions rules by independent refiners.

The move was also intended to claw back control of China's crude refining sector from private refiners to state-owned refineries. And it's reminiscent of its earlier crackdown on big tech operations that were getting dangerously powerful and seen to be threatening party politics.

China's teapots have been steadily grabbing market share from entrenched state players such as China Petroleum and Chemical Corporation (NYSE:SNP), also known as Sinopec, and PetroChina Co. (NYSE:PTR) ever since Beijing partially liberalized its oil industry in 2015. Teapots currently control nearly 30% of China's crude refining volumes, up from ~10% in 2013.

But traders are now growing optimistic that Beijing will soon wrap up a probe on the teapots. Indeed, a fourth batch of quota is expected to be issued in September or October, which could revive demand from independent refiners.

Something else working in the teapots' favor is that crude stocks by China's national oil companies are very low, and private refiners could help bridge the shortfall. Imports into China's Shandong province, home to most teapots, fell below 3 million barrels in both July and August, compared with ~3.6 million barrels on average in the first half of 2021.

China's central bank has also said it will try and stabilize the supply of credit and increase the amount of money supporting smaller businesses. There are expectations for further stimulus targeting the infrastructure sector, manufacturing, and real estate after the July slowdown left the economic situation looking bleak.
By Alex Kimani for Oilprice.com

China Is Hoarding Crude Again, And That’s Great News For Oil Prices | OilPrice.com
Make no mistake, China Hoarding Crude is a prewar move
 
Last edited:

TheDoberman

Veteran Member
This video about a coming war between China and Taiwan was made two years ago. This is even more relevant now than it was then. I find this highly interesting and the time frames coincide perfectly. The economic damage that this would cause is absolutely staggering, even if it stayed completely conventional.

View: https://youtu.be/_keFhXPclns
 

northern watch

TB Fanatic
This video about a coming war between China and Taiwan was made two years ago. This is even more relevant now than it was then. I find this highly interesting and the time frames coincide perfectly. The economic damage that this would cause is absolutely staggering, even if it stayed completely conventional.

View: https://youtu.be/_keFhXPclns
Since the video was made 2 years ago, China has become stronger and the United States has China Joe!
 

danielboon

TB Fanatic
4 Chinese military planes enter Taiwan’s ADIZ
Intrusion marks 6th day in a row China has sent planes into zone
896

By Eric Chang, Taiwan News, Staff Writer
2021/09/09 12:08
Chinese Shenyang J-16. (MND photo)

Chinese Shenyang J-16. (MND photo)

TAIPEI (Taiwan News) — Four Chinese military planes entered Taiwan’s air defense identification zone (ADIZ) on Wednesday (Sept. 10), marking the seventh intrusion this month.
Wednesday morning, two People’s Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) Shenyang J-16 fighter jets and one Shaanxi Y-8 electronic warfare plane entered the southwest corner of Taiwan’s ADIZ, according to the Ministry of National Defense (MND). This was followed by a Y-8 anti-submarine warfare plane in the afternoon, also in the southwest portion of the zone.
In response, Taiwan sent aircraft, issued radio warnings, and deployed air defense missile systems to track the PLAAF planes.
The sorties marked the sixth day in a row Beijing had sent its aircraft into the identification zone. China has been sending a mix of spotter planes, fighter planes, and bombers into the zone so far this month.
Since September of last year, Beijing has stepped up its gray zone tactics by routinely sending aircraft into Taiwan’s ADIZ, with most occurrences taking place in the southwest corner.
An ADIZ is an area that extends beyond a country’s airspace where air traffic controllers ask incoming aircraft to identify themselves. Gray zone tactics are defined “as an effort or series of efforts beyond steady-state deterrence and assurance that attempts to achieve one’s security objectives without resort to direct and sizable use of force.”
According to MND data, Chinese aircraft were tracked in the ADIZ 14 times in July, 10 times in June, 18 times in May, 22 times in April, 18 times in March, 17 times in February, and 27 times in January. Last year, they were observed 19 times in December, 22 times in November, and 22 times in October.
4 Chinese military planes enter Taiwan’s ADIZ

Flight paths of Chinese planes Wednesday morning. (MND image)
4 Chinese military planes enter Taiwan’s ADIZ

Flight paths of Chinese plane Wednesday afternoon. (MND image)
 

danielboon

TB Fanatic
China threatens to send warships inside US territorial waters
by Tom Rogan, Commentary Writer |
| September 08, 2021 05:00 PM
https://www.facebook.com/dialog/sha...to-send-warships-inside-us-territorial-waters


China, on Wednesday, threatened to send warships into U.S. territorial waters.
The Global Times called on People's Liberation Army Navy warships to travel to "U.S. military bases in the Asia-Pacific and the U.S. allies' coastlines to conduct close-in reconnaissance operations and declare freedom of navigation." The editorial added that "the U.S. will definitely see the PLA show up at its doorstep in the not-too-distant future."





This isn't simple ranting. The Global Times operates under Central Foreign Affairs Commission Director Yang Jiechi . Its words represent a credible threat.
Why is China so furious?
It laments the "naked provocation" of a U.S. Navy destroyer's transit, on Wednesday, within 12 miles of a Chinese artificial island in the South China Sea. Yang's mouthpiece warns that "only by making the U.S. have a taste of its own medicine can we touch the nerves of the U.S. and its allies, and reshape the Western world's understanding of U.S. bullying in the South China Sea."
This assessment bears little relation to reality. China's claims of ownership over the South China Sea are both geographically absurd and politically imperialist . Instead, China is escalating its militarization of the sea for two distinctly unjustified reasons. First, to make these waters safe for unilateral Chinese communist resource extraction. Second, to extract political concessions from other nations in return for their access to the sea. China's leverage is the $3.5 trillion-$4 trillion in annual trade flows that move through the South China Sea.
The Trump and Biden administrations have rightly resisted China's actions with U.S. naval actions such as that on Wednesday. They recognize China's threat to trade, sovereign government, and a key principle of the post-Second World War U.S.-led international order: free transit. But while America's European allies have been unwilling to conduct the U.S.-style transits that so upset China, nations such as Australia, India, Japan, and Vietnam are moving closer to the U.S. position. China thus senses it may face a more robust multilateral challenge.
The language Beijing has employed, here, of conducting "freedom of navigation" activities off "U.S. military bases in the Asia-Pacific and the U.S. allies' coastlines" is clearly intended as a threat to send PLA warships within 12 miles of Guam, Australia, and Japan. (While the Philippines is a U.S. treaty ally, its president has made himself into a human pet for Xi Jinping).
Regardless, U.S. Navy transits of international waters are one thing. PLA transits within 12 miles of sovereign U.S. or allied coasts would be a very different matter. Put another way, where the U.S. is walking through a public park, China claims a right to seize public parks and then engage in home invasions. The reality is clear: By its intent and international law, any Chinese incursion as threatened would constitute an act of provocation bordering on war.
China has no justification to blur the waters.
 

JF&P

Deceased
The chinese are a very dysfunctional culture...as illustrated by their need to "Save Face".
 

Zagdid

Veteran Member

Taiwan navy commissions stealth missile corvette to aid asymmetric war strategy against Beijing
  • The ‘carrier killer’ Ta Jiang was commissioned alongside a high-speed minelayer, both produced by Lung Teh Shipbuilding Company
  • Taiwan’s navy has proposed a budget of US$1.5 billion for the next financial year, including an allocation to upgrade six frigates
Lawrence Chung
Published: 4:01pm, 9 Sep, 2021

91c86220-112e-11ec-aa5f-4ba6b5f6c41c_image_hires_212756.jpg

Members of Taiwan’s navy attend the inauguration ceremony of the Ta Chiang corvette in Yilan county on September 9, 2021. Photo: AFP

Taiwan’s navy has commissioned its first stealth missile corvette to boost its deterrence capability and defend the island.

The multi-mission corvette Ta Jiang (PGG-619), dubbed as a “carrier killer”, was commissioned on Thursday at the same time the island’s navy took delivery of a high-speed minelayer under the supervision of Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen
at a shipyard in Suao in northeast Taiwan.

Both vessels were produced by the Lung Teh Shipbuilding Company as part of the government plan to boost the island’s capability to build and develop its own weapons.

Speaking at a ceremony in Suao, Tsai said the commissioning of the Ta Jiang and delivery of the Min Jiang-class high-speed minelayer were solid proof of this.

“In less than a year, the navy has not only taken delivery of the Ta Jiang, but has also completed various tests of the ship’s combat readiness,” Tsai said, adding that this ended all doubts about its ability to build advanced warships.

With improved stealth ability, better stability and more advanced air attack power, the commissioning of the corvette would help bolster the navy’s deterrence capability, she noted.

The corvette has a maximum speed of 45 knots (83km/h), displacement of 700 tonnes and an operational range of 1,800 nautical miles. It is an upgraded version of its prototype, and is designed to play a key role in the island’s to counter the much larger force the People’s Liberation Armycan muster.

Beijing considers Taiwan part of its territory and has not renounced the use of force to return it to its control. It has ramped up the pressure against the island since Tsai was elected in 2016 and refused to accept the one-China principle.

Equipped with Hsiung Feng (Brave Wind) 2 and 3 anti-ship missiles as well as Hai Chien (Sea Sword) 2 anti-aircraft missiles developed by the government-funded Chung-Shan Institute of Science and Technology, the corvette is able to destroy targets on land or sea, including aircraft carriers. It is equipped with 76mm cannons, Phalanx close-in weapons systems and T-74 machine guns.

With the use of stealth technology, the corvette is able to avoid detection. It can also operate in shallow or coastal waters where larger vessels, such as destroyers and frigates, find it hard to operate, according to the navy.

The shipbuilding company has been contracted to build five more corvettes for the navy by 2023.

On Thursday, the navy also took delivery of the first of the four high-speed minelayers it ordered from the company.

According to Huang Shou-chen, chairman of the Lung Teh Shipbuilding Company, the minelayers fit well with Taiwan’s asymmetric defence strategy, being designed to automatically plant mines at high speeds and to face down an attack by amphibious vehicles trying to land in Taiwan.

With a maximum speed of 14 knots, the vessel is 41 metres long, 8.8 metres wide and has a draft of 1.7 metres with a full load displacement of 347 tons. In addition to the sea mines, it is also equipped with a 20mm T75 gun and two T74 machine guns, naval officials said.

To reinforce its defensive capabilities, the navy has proposed a budget of NT$43.15 billion (US$1.5 billion) for the next financial year with part of the funds used to arm its six Kang Ding-class frigates with the Hai Chien-2 ship-launched missiles.

Other defence hardware listed in the budget includes the High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems and M109A6 “Paladin” self-propelled howitzers, according to defence ministry proposals sent to the legislature for review.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
China threatens to send warships inside US territorial waters
by Tom Rogan, Commentary Writer |
| September 08, 2021 05:00 PM
https://www.facebook.com/dialog/sha...to-send-warships-inside-us-territorial-waters


China, on Wednesday, threatened to send warships into U.S. territorial waters.
The Global Times called on People's Liberation Army Navy warships to travel to "U.S. military bases in the Asia-Pacific and the U.S. allies' coastlines to conduct close-in reconnaissance operations and declare freedom of navigation." The editorial added that "the U.S. will definitely see the PLA show up at its doorstep in the not-too-distant future."





This isn't simple ranting. The Global Times operates under Central Foreign Affairs Commission Director Yang Jiechi . Its words represent a credible threat.
Why is China so furious?
It laments the "naked provocation" of a U.S. Navy destroyer's transit, on Wednesday, within 12 miles of a Chinese artificial island in the South China Sea. Yang's mouthpiece warns that "only by making the U.S. have a taste of its own medicine can we touch the nerves of the U.S. and its allies, and reshape the Western world's understanding of U.S. bullying in the South China Sea."
This assessment bears little relation to reality. China's claims of ownership over the South China Sea are both geographically absurd and politically imperialist . Instead, China is escalating its militarization of the sea for two distinctly unjustified reasons. First, to make these waters safe for unilateral Chinese communist resource extraction. Second, to extract political concessions from other nations in return for their access to the sea. China's leverage is the $3.5 trillion-$4 trillion in annual trade flows that move through the South China Sea.
The Trump and Biden administrations have rightly resisted China's actions with U.S. naval actions such as that on Wednesday. They recognize China's threat to trade, sovereign government, and a key principle of the post-Second World War U.S.-led international order: free transit. But while America's European allies have been unwilling to conduct the U.S.-style transits that so upset China, nations such as Australia, India, Japan, and Vietnam are moving closer to the U.S. position. China thus senses it may face a more robust multilateral challenge.
The language Beijing has employed, here, of conducting "freedom of navigation" activities off "U.S. military bases in the Asia-Pacific and the U.S. allies' coastlines" is clearly intended as a threat to send PLA warships within 12 miles of Guam, Australia, and Japan. (While the Philippines is a U.S. treaty ally, its president has made himself into a human pet for Xi Jinping).
Regardless, U.S. Navy transits of international waters are one thing. PLA transits within 12 miles of sovereign U.S. or allied coasts would be a very different matter. Put another way, where the U.S. is walking through a public park, China claims a right to seize public parks and then engage in home invasions. The reality is clear: By its intent and international law, any Chinese incursion as threatened would constitute an act of provocation bordering on war.
China has no justification to blur the waters.

Yeah, that might be good for internal consumption however if they were to do so, recall the prelude off Hawaii recently, all they will do is undercut their "friends" in DC....
 

jward

passin' thru
World
Japan Officials Escalate Concerns About Possible China Attack on Taiwan
By John Feng On 9/9/21 at 7:41 AM EDT

Exclusive Interview with Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga

World Japan Taiwan China


Political leaders and senior defense officials in Tokyo have upped their concerns about the potential for conflict across the Taiwan Strait, further linking an attack on Taiwan to Japan's own national security this week.
China's Foreign Ministry said it expressed its "strong dissatisfaction and firm opposition" to Japanese counterparts on Thursday following remarks by Japanese Deputy Defense Minister Yasuhide Nakayama, who spoke on the mutual threat faced by Tokyo and Taipei during a forum hosted by Taiwanese think tanks the day before.

Nakayama likened the geographic and cultural proximity between Taiwan and Japan to his nose and mouth. "People say we are like friends, but we are not, we are family," he said, according to a report by the online newspaper Taiwan News. Nakayama made a similar analogy with his nose and eyes during a discussion with the Washington-based Hudson Institute in June.
The outspoken official said Taiwan was now a "key issue" in internal discussions in Japan's ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP). "The next leader's approach toward the Taiwan issue will be a major factor in determining whether they're fit for the job, no matter who they are," he was quoted as saying.
Newsweek Newsletter sign-up >
Read more
During the event co-hosted by the Taiwan NextGen Foundation, the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy and the Taiwan Society of Japan Studies, Nakayama reportedly repeated his opinion that Japan should reconsider its diplomatic arrangement with China. Tokyo switched allegiances from Taipei to Beijing in 1972—seven years before the United States—and unofficial ties with Taiwan have been guided by Japan's own "one China" policy.
At a regular press conference in Beijing, China's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian called Nakayama's remarks "extremely ridiculous."
Taiwan's Aircraft Carrier Killer Warship Enters Service

Sailors of the Republic of China Navy salute in front of ROCS Ta Chiang, Taiwan's latest Tuo Chiang-class corvette, during a commissioning ceremony at Su'ao naval base in Yilan, Taiwan, on September 9, 2021. Political leaders and senior defense officials in Tokyo have raised concerns about the potential for conflict across the Taiwan Strait. Sam Yeh/AFP via Getty Images

Newsweek subscription offers >
Also on Wednesday, LDP foreign affairs official Masahisa Sato told Taiwan's Institute for National Policy Research that Chinese leader Xi Jinping intends to seize Taiwan and would increase military pressure on the island between 2022 and 2027, said a report by the Central News Agency (CNA) in Taipei. The period indicated by Sato would come after Xi secures a likely third term and before the 100-year anniversary of the People's Liberation Army (PLA).

The U.S., Japan and Taiwan needed to "quickly establish" a mechanism for trilateral defense cooperation before it becomes "too late" to act, he was quoted as saying. Sato said the August security dialogue with Taiwan's ruling Democratic Progressive Party marked the beginning of intelligence sharing between the two governme
 

jward

passin' thru
Tyler Rogoway
@Aviation_Intel


The F-22 will not save Taiwan. It can't even have a major impact on an invasion of the island. Sorry, this is reality not the military fantasy in common circulation. I know this spiel of mine isn't new to many of you, but it has never been more relevant after today's viral junk

There are roughly just 125 combat coded F-22s. The fleet runs 50% mission capable rate, a bit higher for the upgraded combat capable aircraft. Assuming you can deploy all of them to the Pacific fast enough in a crisis (good luck with that), you are flying them from Guam or...
dispersed airfields if a shooting war starts. Huge tanker bridge gobbling up flight hours, and the tankers are vulnerable as F-22 has a lousy combat radius and China is fighting in its own back yard...
RAND study said, IIRC, about 4 could remain on station continuously for the start of conflict with a massive logistical effort. FOUR. But they are very finicky aircraft, their readiness would drop fast and even then they can only hold 8 missiles each.

Do the simple math...
You are talking about hundreds of Chinese aircraft flooding that zone, decoys, throngs of cruise missiles, the list goes on and on. Good luck even hiding regardless of LO in that dense of a combat environment. Oh and US fights as a team, support aircraft are vulnerable...
F-22 needs a tanker within a few hundred miles of its location, AWACS and other support aircraft as well. Take away the AWACS and ELINT support things get way tougher. Take away the tanker and you're ****ed...
The F-22 fleet is very small and highly capable, but it is simple math. It is not some invincible superpower. Thinking so is extremely dangerous. When it comes to expeditionary operations around Taiwan China has the massive advantage and by the time the invasion is underway...

It will be too late. They will do massive drills constantly leading up to it, surrounding the island with naval and air power, then one day the 39th drill will become real. It will happen very fast. If we move, they ballistic missile our airfields in the region...
The game is totally different than it was 10 years ago. So the GI Joe visions of US fighting off China during a seizure operation are absolute bullshit. The F-22 is a valuable tool but it is poorly suited to very long-range operations & there are not enough of them to begin with
 

northern watch

TB Fanatic
Tyler Rogoway
@Aviation_Intel


The F-22 will not save Taiwan. It can't even have a major impact on an invasion of the island. Sorry, this is reality not the military fantasy in common circulation. I know this spiel of mine isn't new to many of you, but it has never been more relevant after today's viral junk

There are roughly just 125 combat coded F-22s. The fleet runs 50% mission capable rate, a bit higher for the upgraded combat capable aircraft. Assuming you can deploy all of them to the Pacific fast enough in a crisis (good luck with that), you are flying them from Guam or...
dispersed airfields if a shooting war starts. Huge tanker bridge gobbling up flight hours, and the tankers are vulnerable as F-22 has a lousy combat radius and China is fighting in its own back yard...
RAND study said, IIRC, about 4 could remain on station continuously for the start of conflict with a massive logistical effort. FOUR. But they are very finicky aircraft, their readiness would drop fast and even then they can only hold 8 missiles each.

Do the simple math...
You are talking about hundreds of Chinese aircraft flooding that zone, decoys, throngs of cruise missiles, the list goes on and on. Good luck even hiding regardless of LO in that dense of a combat environment. Oh and US fights as a team, support aircraft are vulnerable...
F-22 needs a tanker within a few hundred miles of its location, AWACS and other support aircraft as well. Take away the AWACS and ELINT support things get way tougher. Take away the tanker and you're ****ed...
The F-22 fleet is very small and highly capable, but it is simple math. It is not some invincible superpower. Thinking so is extremely dangerous. When it comes to expeditionary operations around Taiwan China has the massive advantage and by the time the invasion is underway...

It will be too late. They will do massive drills constantly leading up to it, surrounding the island with naval and air power, then one day the 39th drill will become real. It will happen very fast. If we move, they ballistic missile our airfields in the region...
The game is totally different than it was 10 years ago. So the GI Joe visions of US fighting off China during a seizure operation are absolute bullshit. The F-22 is a valuable tool but it is poorly suited to very long-range operations & there are not enough of them to begin with
Very good article
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Tyler Rogoway
@Aviation_Intel


The F-22 will not save Taiwan. It can't even have a major impact on an invasion of the island. Sorry, this is reality not the military fantasy in common circulation. I know this spiel of mine isn't new to many of you, but it has never been more relevant after today's viral junk

There are roughly just 125 combat coded F-22s. The fleet runs 50% mission capable rate, a bit higher for the upgraded combat capable aircraft. Assuming you can deploy all of them to the Pacific fast enough in a crisis (good luck with that), you are flying them from Guam or...
dispersed airfields if a shooting war starts. Huge tanker bridge gobbling up flight hours, and the tankers are vulnerable as F-22 has a lousy combat radius and China is fighting in its own back yard...
RAND study said, IIRC, about 4 could remain on station continuously for the start of conflict with a massive logistical effort. FOUR. But they are very finicky aircraft, their readiness would drop fast and even then they can only hold 8 missiles each.

Do the simple math...
You are talking about hundreds of Chinese aircraft flooding that zone, decoys, throngs of cruise missiles, the list goes on and on. Good luck even hiding regardless of LO in that dense of a combat environment. Oh and US fights as a team, support aircraft are vulnerable...
F-22 needs a tanker within a few hundred miles of its location, AWACS and other support aircraft as well. Take away the AWACS and ELINT support things get way tougher. Take away the tanker and you're ****ed...
The F-22 fleet is very small and highly capable, but it is simple math. It is not some invincible superpower. Thinking so is extremely dangerous. When it comes to expeditionary operations around Taiwan China has the massive advantage and by the time the invasion is underway...

It will be too late. They will do massive drills constantly leading up to it, surrounding the island with naval and air power, then one day the 39th drill will become real. It will happen very fast. If we move, they ballistic missile our airfields in the region...
The game is totally different than it was 10 years ago. So the GI Joe visions of US fighting off China during a seizure operation are absolute bullshit. The F-22 is a valuable tool but it is poorly suited to very long-range operations & there are not enough of them to begin with

Yup.

You want to stop Beijing? You have to make them believe that we'll kill them until the rubble is fused glass if they try it. In the last 8 months, Biden has blown what little threat that might have been possessed by the US. The number of bodies that will now be stacked because of it in the future is going to be horrific.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Posted for fair use.....

September 13, 2021
China is in deep trouble and bound to get worse

By Uldis Sprogis

Is China the next superpower? Is the media's depiction of the country as a ten-foot giant really accurate? That's dubious. For all its bluster on the global stage, China is a giant in trouble.

Here are some of the reasons we know:

Perhaps the biggest problem in China is its erstwhile "one child" policy, which created many single, self-absorbed adults with poor social skills and an entitlement mindset that included no great desire to marry young and bear the financial burden of offspring. China switched to a two-child policy and recently revised it to allow three children per family. But it's too little, too late. The best result is that in about 20 years, the Chinese population will probably be more than halved anyway, instead of something worse, and the elderly will be a great burden on their single offspring and the economy.

Already only about 10% of China's young population is getting married, which implies an even more precipitous drop in population in the future. China does not encourage immigration from abroad, so a precipitous drop in population will have a drastically bad impact on a shrinking economy and even on the social life of the average Chinese.

Another problem is income disparity, with a vast gulf of differences between a tiny urban elite and the country's many urban and rural poor. It's an even greater disparity in income wealth distribution than exists in the United States. That may be a reason why the CCP has decided to crack down on glorified celebrities and wealthy capitalists and is forcefully trying to redistribute their wealth, especially to the tech working class, who largely have been working a 996 shift, which means working from 9 A.M. to 9 P.M.., six days a week.

With such a hard work schedule, it is no wonder that the CCP had to suppress a lying flat movement on the internet, which tried to popularize minimum work, no marriage, living single, and not doing much of anything. This movement sprang up as a passive revolt over the oppressive working conditions in the nation. It is no wonder that with slave labor–like working conditions, Chinese youths have little time to socialize and, with low, wages don't have enough money to comfortably support a family with offspring.

The CCP also views foreign influences, and especially the English language, as another corrupting influence on the population. Too many ideas about freedom and a population starts to question why their dictatorial leaders should be there. That is seen as a threat to the country's stability; therefore, the authorities have acted.

The Chinese government recently has stopped having exams for the English language in primary schools. Instructors will probably soon no longer teach much English to the average Chinese. You can almost say the CCP is getting paranoid about Western culture corrupting the Chinese population. Already there has been censorship of Western literature, movies, videos, websites, and apps. Meanwhile, video games are limited to three hours a day for children under 18, visas are harder to get for Chinese citizens and foreigners, and probably more censorship of lifestyle is on the way.

On the foreign policy front, China has problems, too.

Because Chinese fishing fleets fish in the territorial waters of foreign nations, because they make the "Belt and Road" loans to foreign countries for development on unscrupulous terms, and because they build artificial islands in the South China Sea in a bid to nationalize international territory, they are in trouble. They are in even worse trouble because of COVID-19's spread throughout the world, which hasn't improved their global name. Worse still, they threateningly fly military aircraft into Taiwanese airspace, and, in a new development to come of it, many nations have banded together to challenge Chinese hegemony. China's reputation as a potential trusted ally is being quickly eroded, and many companies are leaving China and seeking profitable havens in other countries.

In China's rush to outcompete the West by stealing intellectual property and making cheap knockoffs, the Chinese are developing a bad, unethical reputation internationally. That reduces its clout. Amazon has finally stopped selling thousands of counterfeit Chinese goods on the internet, and many stock investors are beginning to pull their money out of Chinese company stocks, fearing more strong-arm censorship tactics from the CCP such as making for-profit tutoring companies illegal.

China rushed to make a submarine for the military, but that has been trouble for the Chinese, too. The end product was so noisy that it left an easy-to-locate signal underwater, which makes it rather useless as a stealth weapon in future military conflicts. Its aircraft carriers are also handicapped with flaws that make them marginally useful in times of war.

China may be good at knockoffs, but innovation is not its forte. There is no attempt at stimulating intellectual property and patents in research and development. In effect, there is very little national or private incentive for new, innovative companies to start and grow into viable companies, as is the case in Silicon Valley and elsewhere in the USA.

Meanwhile, industrialization is polluting the water supply and countryside, farmers are restricted from moving into cities for fear that food shortages will escalate, wealthy celebrities and capitalists are being financially cut down to size or ostracized, there is a housing bubble that threatens to decimate the real estate business and many workers with it, and the average citizen is being terrorized by a social credit system and cell phone surveillance, all designed to create fear in dissenters and rule-breakers.

There are many signs of hasty faulty planning and building, which is resulting in high-rise building and bridge defects and even collapses, overflowing dams, and severe flooding conditions that are ruining potable drinking water and disrupting many lives. All of this is just further evidence that China has troubles up the wazoo and will have even more in the foreseeable future.

China may still have a favorable balance of trade with other nations, but it seems as though the CCP's unethical attempt to force more traditional communism onto the nation will result in long-duration suffering for the people and an inability to become a respected dominant political player in the international field. The CCP is attempting to further increase centralized top-down government planning, which is always disastrous in the long run and portends failure and misery for China, similar to the final failure of the Soviet Union government.

Many failing debt-overloaded businesses are being subsidized by a deficit spending government, so bankruptcies are still few and far between, but the day of financial reckoning is rapidly coming.

The United States is in bad shape morally and economically, but the power of money has corrupted the leadership of China to the point where no amount of coercive CCP effort will solve the problems. China's troubles will balloon in the foreseeable future. China is in trouble, and the CCP's strong-arm tactics, censorship, and high housing costs are just making a bad situation worse for the average Chinese citizen.

Image: Pixabay, Pixabay License.

To comment, you can find the MeWe post for this article here.
 

northern watch

TB Fanatic
Taiwan Is Arming Itself To Beat A Chinese Invasion. Some New Weapons Are Better Than Others.

David Axe
Forbes Staff
Sep 13, 2021,08:00am EDT

1631596740541.png

The Taiwanese defense ministry is asking lawmakers for $17 billion for 2022. That record budget, accounting for 2.3% of the country’s gross domestic product, would be a 5% boost over 2021’s spending.

The budget would pay for, among other things, new air-defense missiles for the navy’s six Kang Ding-class frigates plus four MQ-9B armed drones for the air force as well as a host of missiles for that service’s growing fleet of new F-16V fighters.

Most of the proposed expenditures—but not all—align with Taiwan’s increasingly defensive war strategy.

Where once the 24 million-person island democracy boasted more and better ships, planes and tanks than its much more populous enemy, today China with its 1.4 billion people has a quantitative and, increasingly, qualitative military advantage over Taiwan.

So Taipei increasingly is leaning on the natural advantage any defender has against an attacker.

“Unifying” Taiwan with China is the central tenet of the Chinese Communist Party’s foreign policy. But Chinese troops have to go to Taiwan to get what Beijing wants. Taiwanese troops don’t have to move an inch. And they’ve had decades to dig in.

Strategists have a word for this defensive crouch. It’s the “porcupine” approach to warfare.

It’s not for no reason that missiles—plus sensors to guide them and vehicles to launch them—lately have dominated Taipei’s spending plans. In recent years, Taiwanese officials have initiated large-scale purchases of new anti-ship, land-attack and anti-air missiles. The porcupine’s spines. Many hundreds of them.

The idea is to lob so many missiles at an incoming Chinese invasion force that the munitions overwhelm the invaders’ defenses. The goal is to sink half of the potentially hundreds of large ships carrying Chinese troops toward Taiwan’s ports and beaches.

Not all missiles are created equal, however. And some of the investments the Taiwanese military wants to make in 2022 are more worthwhile than others.

The four U.S.-made MQ-9s make a lot of sense. The 2022 budget proposal hints that Taiwan might buy the armed variant of General Atomics’ propeller-driven Sea Guardian drone, which in essence is a tougher, farther-flying version of the company’s basic Reaper.

But the Taiwanese air force doesn’t need the $600 million Sea Guardian set—the four air vehicles plus ground control stations—for the handful of short-range Hellfire missiles the drones might haul into battle.

It needs the drones to spot targets for the 400 Boeing-made Harpoon anti-ship missiles, and 100 truck-mounted launchers, that the navy is buying for around $2.4 billion, as well as for the Harpoons arming the roughly 200 new and upgraded F-16Vs the air force is acquiring from U.S. plane-maker Lockheed Martin under an $8 billion deal.

The 2022 budget also includes $360 million for additional weapons—potentially hundreds of them—for the F-16V squadrons, including anti-ship Harpoons plus Standoff Land-Attack Missiles-Expanded Response and radar-seeking High-Speed Anti-Radiation Missiles.

The hundreds of American-made missiles comprise just a portion of Taiwan’s growing arsenal of land-attack and anti-ship cruise missiles. The army, navy and air force already are holding onto around 800 missiles in this class—locally made models, mostly.

The truck-launched Harpoons will grow the missile stockpile to 1,200—the bare minimum Taiwanese officials say they need in order to sink half of a Chinese invasion fleet and thwart an attack on the island. Additional missiles decrease the risk for Taiwanese forces and increase it for the Chinese.

Upgrading six frigates for $1.5 billion, while comforting to those ships’ crews, is largely meaningless in this context. The six 1990s-vintage Kang Ding frigates, based on the French La Fayette class, are holdovers from a time when the Taiwanese navy outgunned the Chinese navy and stood a chance of defeating an invasion fleet far offshore.

With the PLA Navy’s explosive growth in recent years, that time has passed. The Chinese fleet operates 170 corvettes, frigates, destroyers and cruisers. The Taiwanese fleet has just 28 such vessels. And the Taiwanese ships are much older than the Chinese ships are.

It’s true that the Kang Ding frigates are in need of a firepower overhaul. At present, their only major air-defense weapon is a naval version of the outdated Chaparral missile with a five-mile range. The 2022 budget proposes to replace the Chaparral with the new locally-made TC-2N missile with a 20-mile range.

But the TC-2N won’t save the Kang Dings in a naval clash with the vastly superior Chinese fleet. The new missile at best would delay the Taiwanese fleet’s defeat.

A possible war over Taiwan could be won or lost at the beachhead, as a Chinese invasion force fights its way through a swarm of air- and surface-launched anti-ship missiles.

New drones help the defenders’ chances by improving the missiles’ targeting. Slightly up-arming six frigates doesn’t help much at all.

Taiwan Is Arming Itself To Beat A Chinese Invasion. Some New Weapons Are Better Than Others. (forbes.com)
 

northern watch

TB Fanatic
China Threatens Drastic Action If Taiwan Changes Name Of D.C. Office: 'We'll Fly PLA Jets Directly Over Island'

BY TYLER DURDEN
ZERO HEDGE
MONDAY, SEP 13, 2021 - 01:30 PM

Chinese state media has lashed out at the Biden administration over reports the US is "seriously considering" allowing the Taiwanese government to rename its representative office in Washington to include the word "Taiwan".

Currently Taipei's representative office in the United States formally goes by the name "Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office" - however, there's a current proposal to change it to "Taiwan Representative Office" in direct defiance of the mainland's claims of sovereignty over the island.

Though an official reaction out of Beijing wasn't forthcoming, the typically outspoken editor of state-run English publication Global Times voiced what top communist party officials are surely thinking, warning of "full scale" sanctions and stepped up military patrols directly over Taiwan aimed at keeping Taiwan in check should the renaming happen.




Nameplate of the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the US, via Liberty Times


Hu Xijin wrote that "If this happens, diplomatically, China will at least recall its ambassador to the US." Such a scenario would dramatically worsen already deeply strained US-China relations and comes just days after a reportedly contentious phone call between Presidents Joe Biden and Xi Jinping on Friday.

The GT Editor warned further that if the renaming goes through China will take bold action on the economic front as well, following years-long efforts to isolate Taiwan diplomatically:

Economically, it will shift from "preferential policies" for Taiwan to full-scale sanctions. Militarily, the PLA fighter jets will surely fly over the island, and start to patrol Taiwan.

Already for much of the past year Chinese PLA jet and bomber formations have routinely breached Taiwan's Air Defense Identification zone, in what's become a near weekly exercise. Typically Taiwan scrambles jets to mirror and chase off the Chinese formations.

But the scenario of Chinese fighters "flying over" the island - as opposed to merely breaching remote claimed air boundaries - would mark a huge escalation that could spark war should Taiwan choose to respond directly with anti-air fire. A Monday Global Times editorial is essentially vowing as much (i.e.: serious military escalation over Taiwan)...

The new GT op-ed makes the following threats:

Sending PLA fighter jets over the island of Taiwan is a step we must take. The move will pose a fundamental warning to the Taiwan authorities and bring about reconstruction of the situation across the Taiwan Straits. It will be a clear declaration of China's sovereignty over Taiwan island, and create unprecedented conditions for us to further implement this sovereignty.

The "airspace" over the Taiwan island belongs to the airspace of China. The so-called middle line of the Taiwan Straits has never been recognized by the Chinese mainland. Therefore, there is sufficient legal basis for the PLA fighter jets to fly over the island.

It's not the first time there's been a move to rename Taipei's diplomatic offices abroad in an attempt to assert national sovereignty; however, China has in the past successfully pressured host countries to force Taiwan's missions to drop the word "Taiwan".

As Kyodo News recalls:
It competes as "Chinese Taipei" at the Olympic Games and also uses that name to participate in the World Trade Organization -- an arrangement designed to overcome China's objections to any international recognition of its sovereignty.
According to the Financial Times, between 2017 and 2019, seven of Taipei's missions in countries without diplomatic recognition, including Nigeria, Jordan and Ecuador, had "Taiwan" or "Republic of China" forcibly removed from their names by their host countries under pressure from Beijing.

And yet for the first time the US is "seriously considering" allowing it, which means if the trigger is pulled the US administration would stand behind it, no matter the pressure. The question remains whether the White House will wish to see this escalation unfold, including the perhaps unpredictable Chinese response, over what would largely remain a deeply "symbolic" assertion of sovereignty flying in the face of Beijing's claims.

China has without doubt long considered Taiwan and US efforts to recognize and back it a "red line" issue, declaring it won't hesitate to act militarily if the issue of "independence" is openly provoked from Washington.

China Threatens Drastic Action If Taiwan Changes Name Of D.C. Office: 'We'll Fly PLA Jets Directly Over Island' | ZeroHedge
 

northern watch

TB Fanatic
China Threatens Drastic Action If Taiwan Changes Name Of D.C. Office: 'We'll Fly PLA Jets Directly Over Island'

BY TYLER DURDEN
ZERO HEDGE
MONDAY, SEP 13, 2021 - 01:30 PM

Chinese state media has lashed out at the Biden administration over reports the US is "seriously considering" allowing the Taiwanese government to rename its representative office in Washington to include the word "Taiwan".

Currently Taipei's representative office in the United States formally goes by the name "Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office" - however, there's a current proposal to change it to "Taiwan Representative Office" in direct defiance of the mainland's claims of sovereignty over the island.

Though an official reaction out of Beijing wasn't forthcoming, the typically outspoken editor of state-run English publication Global Times voiced what top communist party officials are surely thinking, warning of "full scale" sanctions and stepped up military patrols directly over Taiwan aimed at keeping Taiwan in check should the renaming happen.




Nameplate of the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the US, via Liberty Times


Hu Xijin wrote that "If this happens, diplomatically, China will at least recall its ambassador to the US." Such a scenario would dramatically worsen already deeply strained US-China relations and comes just days after a reportedly contentious phone call between Presidents Joe Biden and Xi Jinping on Friday.

The GT Editor warned further that if the renaming goes through China will take bold action on the economic front as well, following years-long efforts to isolate Taiwan diplomatically:



Already for much of the past year Chinese PLA jet and bomber formations have routinely breached Taiwan's Air Defense Identification zone, in what's become a near weekly exercise. Typically Taiwan scrambles jets to mirror and chase off the Chinese formations.

But the scenario of Chinese fighters "flying over" the island - as opposed to merely breaching remote claimed air boundaries - would mark a huge escalation that could spark war should Taiwan choose to respond directly with anti-air fire. A Monday Global Times editorial is essentially vowing as much (i.e.: serious military escalation over Taiwan)...

The new GT op-ed makes the following threats:



It's not the first time there's been a move to rename Taipei's diplomatic offices abroad in an attempt to assert national sovereignty; however, China has in the past successfully pressured host countries to force Taiwan's missions to drop the word "Taiwan".

As Kyodo News recalls:



And yet for the first time the US is "seriously considering" allowing it, which means if the trigger is pulled the US administration would stand behind it, no matter the pressure. The question remains whether the White House will wish to see this escalation unfold, including the perhaps unpredictable Chinese response, over what would largely remain a deeply "symbolic" assertion of sovereignty flying in the face of Beijing's claims.

China has without doubt long considered Taiwan and US efforts to recognize and back it a "red line" issue, declaring it won't hesitate to act militarily if the issue of "independence" is openly provoked from Washington.

China Threatens Drastic Action If Taiwan Changes Name Of D.C. Office: 'We'll Fly PLA Jets Directly Over Island' | ZeroHedge

What is China Joe doing? Is he trying to create an excuse for China to invade Taiwan?
 
Top