GOV/MIL Leftists Call For New "Secret Police" Force To Spy On Trump Supporters (AN ABSOLUTELY MUST-READ THREAD)

vector7

Dot Collector
More Public Private Partnerships with Corporate America to push JoBama's mandates on the private sector.

ReclaimTheNet.org
@reclaimthenet


27m·
Biden administration launches task force to share census and health data with private companies

Biden administration launches task force to share census and health data with private companies

Biden administration launches task force to share census and health data with private companies
Google's director of cloud AI is a member.


ManWithNoCheckMark @Bighockeypuck

·25m
@reclaimthenet MORE FASCISM!!!! PUBLIC PRIVATE "PARTNERSHIPS"! To
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

"Hundreds" Of Whistleblowers Say Military Forcing "Anti-American Indoctrination" On Them: Sen. Cotton

FRIDAY, JUN 11, 2021 - 12:23 PM
Authored by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times,

Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) told Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin on June 10 that “hundreds” of military whistleblowers have reported being forced to receive “anti-American indoctrination” training, including critical race theory (CRT).




Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) speaks during a hearing to examine United States Special Operations Command and United States Cyber Command in review of the Defense Authorization Request for fiscal year 2022 and the Future Years Defense Program, on Capitol Hill in Washington on March 25, 2021. (Andrew Harnik-Pool/Getty Images)

In a Senate hearing with Austin, Cotton claimed that within the military, there’s “plummeting morale, growing mistrust between races and sexes where none existed just six months ago and unexpected retirements and separations based on these trainings alone.”

One whistleblower, Cotton alleged, said that military history training was replaced with training about police brutality, “systemic racism,” and “white privilege.” Another said that his unit had to read “White Fragility” by feminist author and critical theory proponent Robin DiAngelo, according to the senator.

In May, the Space Force confirmed it relieved Lt. Col. Matthew Lohmeier, a former instructor and fighter pilot, as commander of the 11th Space Warning Squadron. While it didn’t specifically name the reason why Lohmeier was terminated, the Space Force cited comments made by Lohmeier during a podcast in which he denounced CRT and warned about the spread of Marxism within the Space Force’s ranks.

CRT, which draws heavily upon Marxist critical theory and postmodernist writers, denounces U.S. and Western culture as oppressive, and often claims American culture and institutions are promoting “systemic racism” or “white supremacy.” Some critics have said the ideology’s proponents apply the Marxist tactic of “class struggle” to drive people along the lines of gender, race, and ethnicity, rather than between the “proletariat” and “bourgeoisie.”


Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin speaks during a briefing at the Pentagon in Washington on May 6, 2021. (Susan Walsh/AP Photo)

In the hearing, Austin told Cotton that some training is designed to make sure that the armed forces are “welcoming to everyone who can qualify and who is fit to serve.”
“We ought to look like the America we support and defend, and senior leadership should look like what’s in the ranks,” Austin said.
But Cotton suggested that claims the military is attempting to foster diversity with such training are incorrect.
“[It’s] about a very specific kind of anti-American indoctrination that is seeping into some parts of our military, based on the whistleblower complaints we have received,” he said.

“The military for decades has been one of the institutions in society where you are most likely to get ahead based on your own performance, your own merit, irrespective of the color of your skin, where you came from, who your parents were.”
Austin agreed with Cotton’s sentiment.
“I absolutely agree with that. I am an example of that,” he said.
Austin went on to state that the military needs to be “a bit better,” be “absolutely inclusive,” and promote “equity.”

The terms “inclusive” and “equity” have been used in social justice circles for years.

Austin then argued that by doing so, it’ll be the “most effective and lethal fighting force in the world.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
war room.JPG
12:39 min

War Room Exposes Mao's Cultural Revolution in America
Bannons War Room Published June 11, 2021
— Stephen K. Bannon, Eric Greitens, and Alexandra Preate dissect the insidious Marxist cultural revolution taking root in America.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

'The Poison in Our Schools': Filmmaker Exposes Critical Race Theory Indoctrination 7:27 min

'The Poison in Our Schools': Filmmaker Exposes Critical Race Theory Indoctrination
Bannons War Room Published June 11, 2021

Filmmaker John Spiropoulos reveals his latest project exposing the indoctrination of critical race theory throughout all levels of public education.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
referenced from above interview


The Poison in Our Schools 11:37 min

The Poison in Our Schools
Let's Roll America Published June 11, 2021
Parents across the country are opposing the use of use of Critical Race Theory to design the curriculum for students in elementary and high school. This series of reports (24 are planned) which needs your financial support, will show parents how CRT influences what their children are taught.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whYI3NHiykk
32:16 min

Desantis Scores MAJOR Victory For Conservatives, FL BANS Critical Race Theory Sparking Woke Outrage

•Jun 11, 2021


Tim Pool


Desantis Scores MAJOR Victory For Conservatives, FL BANS Critical Race Theory Sparking Woke Outrage. Democrats and woke media claim Ron Desantis is trying to ban the teaching of history but this is false. Critical race theory is a reactionary ideology that seeks to restore discrimination in the US under the guise of academic theory. Republicans have struggled to even address the issue but Desantis as usual is ahead of the curve.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

'Cancerous': Troops, vets slam Army officer's alleged woke slur as Fort Carson launches probe

Backlash against officer's reported words comes amid charges that the Biden administration has pushed the Pentagon to impose a leftist agenda on the force.

By Susan Katz Keating
Updated: June 11, 2021 - 10:53pm

An Army commander is under not-so-friendly rhetorical fire from troops outraged at comments the officer reportedly made denigrating white men as a class. The episode has prompted a formal investigation and reinvigorated a debate over whether the Biden administration is imposing a leftist agenda on the military.

Social media pages for a soldiers' network reported the comments in Tuesday posts on Instagram and Facebook. The posts alleged Lt. Col. Andrew Rhodes, a new battalion commander at Fort Carson, Colo., told his troops: "If you're a white male, you are part of the problem."

The comments were published by @terminalcwo, whose social media accounts feature military humor and posts about situations within the military.

Just the News was not able to reach Lt. Col. Rhodes, who this week took command of the 1-8 Infantry "Fighting Eagles" at Fort Carson. Rhodes remained in command as of Thursday, when he attended a ceremony at Fort Carson.

Officials at the fort acknowledged Friday they have launched a preliminary probe.

"The command is aware of an event involving one of our battalion commanders, we are conducting a preliminary inquiry to gather more information," Fort Carson spokesman Amber Martin wrote in an email to Just the News. "It would be inappropriate to provide any further details in order to protect the integrity of the inquiry."

The posts on social media were first posted June 8.

"Looks like Fort Carson got themselves a real gem of an unbiased commander," wrote an @terminalcwo webmaster. "I hope you're not white or ever accused of anything while you're in his command. You're already guilty, and you didn't even know it!"

The posts included screen shots of texts from a soldier who wrote: "He said that anyone who wasn't a white male would be afraid to call out something that made them uncomfortable and rambled about how if you don't like how woke the army is getting then get the f--- out of it."

These and other alleged comments attributed to Rhodes brought swift reaction from active-duty troops, and veterans.

"Rhodes basically condemned over half the military and risks doing serious damage to troop morale, if the reports are true," said Jason Beardsley, National Director of the Association of the United States Navy. "Army leadership should do everything possible to protect soldiers from this cancerous behavior, and it does appear to be taking the right steps."

Privately, soldiers at Fort Carson said they found the comments to be both disturbing and enlightening.

"He assumes that white males are always in the wrong," one black enlisted man told Just the News. "He made that loud and clear. We know who he is, and he is divisive. It's bad for morale, but at least we know that up front."

"This commander showed us his bias," a white enlisted woman said. "I would not want to serve in his unit. I'd tell them straight up. I do not trust my commander."

Social media users scoured through cached copies of a now-deleted Twitter account alleged to have belonged to Rhodes. Screen shots of tweets from the account provided fodder for mockery. One social media user, @donjohnnyyy, wrote: "Those tweets make as much sense as a Biden interview." Another, @douglarfresh, commented: "Stunning and brave. So woke."

Others on social media defended Rhodes, praising him for trying to improve the Army. Others called out the critics. One account, @UncleLarry4, tweeted: "White men are being held accountable and starting to figure out the world doesn't revolve around them. And they don't like it."

The controversy comes amid increasing charges that President Biden and his defense secretary, Lloyd Austin, have pushed the Department of Defense (DOD) to impose a leftist agenda on the force.

"DOD's decision to promote so-called woke ideals over combat readiness and morale only encourages this divisive behavior when we should be focused on winning wars," said Beardsley, who served in the Navy and then as an Army Green Beret.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Glenn Beck: 'I Won't be Silenced by a Bunch of Marxists'

Renee Nal
June 10, 2021

Screenshot-306-1200x630.png


It is very important that Americans follow this example and loudly call out Marxism, which is gaining ground in America and the entire planet.

Glenn Beck appeared on Tucker Carlson this week to take back his apology for calling Barack Obama a racist back in 2009. Speaking directly to Obama, Beck declared “You are are a racist.” Further, in a welcome and bold statement, Glenn Beck said “I won’t be silenced by a bunch of Marxists.”

It is very important that Americans follow this example and loudly call out Marxism, which is gaining ground in America and the entire planet. Beck referenced “Critical Race Theory” in his apology retraction:
“I was not versed on Critical Race Theory. I wasn’t versed in the language of Marxists. Now, Barack Obama, I am. I take my apology back. I was exactly right. And I even stated it right. You are a racist.”
Watch the segment here:

Rumble video on website 5:06 Min

Democrat presidents have proven themselves to be obsessed with race. But out of all of the racist democrat presidents to date, Barack Obama was the worst – and that is saying quite a bit.

Woodrow Wilson single-handedly brought back the Ku Klux Klan, Bill Clinton belonged to an all-white country club as recently as 1992, Lyndon B. Johnson’s “Great Society” program to get black votes has led to disastrous results for black Americans, Franklin D. Roosevelt appointed KKK member Hugo Black to the Supreme Court and Joe Biden can’t seem to stop making demeaning statements about black people (see here, here and here).

Obama IS a Racist – But he is Mostly a Marxist
Author and filmmaker Trevor Loudon is an expert on communism, who warned about Obama’s deep Marxist ties in his book “Barack Obama and the Enemies Within“. In his show CounterPunch, Loudon addressed the Marxist roots of Critical Race Theory and related Marxist concepts of “Black Liberation Theology,” “Systemic Racism,” “White Fragility,” “Institutional Racism” and “White Privilege“.

As Loudon mentions in his broadcast, (start 8:59) the “father” of Critical Race Theory was Harvard Professor Derrick Bell, one of Barack Obama’s many Marxist mentors.

But Barack Obama is the most dangerous of them all because coupled with his racism is a deep hatred of America brought about by a lifetime surrounded by communists such as Frank Marshall Davis, Jim Wallis, Jeremiah Wright, Derrick Bell and many, many others. Glenn Beck should not have apologized in the first place, and he did not go far enough in his condemnation.

Obama is not just a racist, he is a hardcore Marxist.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Now they're trying to cancel apple pie by linking the dessert to 'genocide of indigenous people' and slavery

PAUL SACCA
June 10, 2021

Tom McCorkle for The Washington Post via Getty Images

Is there anything better than a slice of homemade apple pie? An hour after it comes out of the oven when the delectable dessert still has warm apple slices swimming in ooey-gooey simmering sugar syrup, providing a perfect balance of sweetness and tartness? The ambrosial aroma of cinnamon and allspice dances around your nose, and the tender crust is buttery and flaky at the same time. But when a left-wing writer for the Guardian eats apple pie, all he can taste is the genocide of indigenous people with a heavy aftertaste of slavery.

Food writer and activist Raj Patel wrote an article for the Guardian titled: "Food injustice has deep roots: let's start with America's apple pie." Patel claims that apple pie is rooted in colonialism and slavery. He must be fun at dinner parties.

"In the drama of nationalist culture, the bloody and international origins of the apple pie are subject to a collective amnesia," Patel wrote. "The apple pie is as American as stolen land, wealth, and labor. We live its consequences today."

Patel then emphasizes that the apple pie and many of its ingredients are not from America, which is true. There were only small, wild crabapples native to North America until apples (Malus domestica) were brought from England to the Jamestown settlement in 1607. Preceding that, the original wild species of apples (Malus sieversii) was originally from Central Asia, in areas such as modern-day Kazakhstan and China, and introduced to Europe through the Silk Road trade routes. "Several societies were consuming apples in present-day Greece and Italy since 2000 BCE," according to the World Atlas.

Patel claimed, "Apples traveled to the western hemisphere with Spanish colonists in the 1500s in what used to be called the Columbian Exchange, but is now better understood as a vast and ongoing genocide of indigenous people."

Patel believes that the planting of apple trees in Virginia "were used to demonstrate to the state that land had been improved." He added, "John Chapman, better known as Johnny Appleseed, took these markers of colonized property to the frontiers of U.S. expansion where his trees stood as symbols that indigenous communities had been extirpated.'

Encyclopedia Britannica states that the "age of modern colonialism began about 1500, following the European discoveries of a sea route around Africa's southern coast (1488) and of America (1492)." However, the first recorded recipe for apple pie was written in 1381 in England, according to Smithsonian Magazine, noting that the pie was made with apples, figs, raisins, pears, and saffron, and most likely didn't include sugar. So which came first: the western colonialism or the apple pie?

The writer then links the sugar in the apple pie to slavery.
Not that the sugar on the crust is uniquely American. Sugar cane was first brought to the US by Jesuits in 1751, but most U.S. sugar remained an import until the Haitian revolution. When enslaved workers seized the French colony in 1791, European capitalists sought new sugar cane fields and workers. French merchants of sugar and slavery landed in Louisiana in the late 1700s. Within 50 years, the US produced a quarter of the world's sugar cane, and New Orleans had become a concomitant hub of the slave trade.
Patel notes that the American apple pie recipe is a "variant on an English pumpkin recipe," and that gingham, the plaid cotton cloth on which our apple pie rests, isn't American. He then relates the cotton in the cloth to a "war capitalism enslaved and committed acts of genocide against millions of indigenous people in North America, and millions of Africans and their descendants through the transatlantic slave trade," which he alleges was the "basis of finance, police, and government that made the United States."

Patel is going to have to try harder to cancel apple pie – how are you going to deny yourself a delicious slice of warm apple pie with a soft scoop of vanilla bean ice cream on top of the flaky crust?
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

— NEWS —
Survivor Of Mao’s China: Critical Race Theory ‘Is Racist,’ China Used ‘Wokeness’ To Install Communism

By Daily Wire News
•Jun 11, 2021 DailyWire.com

Xi Van Fleet
Screenshot: Fox News

A Chinese woman who survived the brutal Chinese communist regime of dictator Mao Zedong is warning Americans that the same things that happened during the Chinese Cultural Revolution are now happening in the United States.

Xi Van Fleet, whose impassioned speech to a Virginia school board went viral earlier this week, joined Fox News host Sean Hannity on Thursday night to further elaborate on the similarities between what happened in China and what is happening in the U.S. right now.

“Okay, I just want to let the American people know that what’s going on in our school and in our country is really a replay of the Cultural Revolution in China, and I want people to see the similarities and the similarities are terrifying,” Van Fleet said. “They use the same ideology, and same methodology, even the same vocabulary. And with the same goal. The ideology is Cultural Marxism. And we were divided into groups as the oppressor and oppressed. And here we use race, and they’re the use class. And the people here who have a different review, were labeled racist. But in the Cultural Revolution, the label is counterrevolutionary. So it is a hat that fits all. And once the hat is on your head, your life is ruined.”

“And the take out methodology is also very similar. It’s cancel culture, we basically canceled the whole Chinese civilization pre-communism,” she continued. “And we changed our school names, street names, store names; we changed even our personal names. My name is Xi and I was named after the city I was born, Xi’an. She means West; it also refers to the imperialism. So I wanted so bad to change my name because I want to be more communist. I’m glad my parents convinced me not to. And the vocabulary is even the same wokeness. And to be specific, we use class wokeness. In Chinese it is [phrase spoken in Chinese], your level of wokeness determine your chance to get the promotion or to get benefit and who decide your level of wokeness and is the party leaders.”

A couple of minutes later, Van Fleet warned that “freedom is fragile, and we can lose it anytime if we don’t defend it.”

“And there’s a lot of Chinese Americans who have the same experience and share my point of view,” she continued. “And I know that more and more people will still step up and share their stories and tell the American people critical race theory is not anti-racism, it is itself is racist. It’s divisive, it’s destructive, and it is dangerous.”

WATCH:

View: https://youtu.be/WZwli4WdZmI
6:10 min

TRANSCRIPT:

SEAN HANNITY, FOX NEWS HOST: More developments tonight on how parents and common sense Americans are pushing back against the destructive far-left critical race theory ideology that’s infiltrating America’s schools. Just listen to how one Virginia mom who actually survived Mao’s China eviscerates her local school board amid the district’s critical race theory push, take a look at this.
[START VIDEO]
XI VAN FLEET: I’ve been very alarmed by what’s going on in our schools. You are now training our children to be social justice warriors and to loathe our country and our history. Growing up in Mao’s China, all of this seems very familiar. The Communist regime used the same critical theory to divide people; the only difference is they used class instead of race. … This is, indeed, the American version of the Chinese Cultural Revolution. The Critical Race Theory has its roots in cultural Marxism. It should have no place in our schools.
[END VIDEO]
HANNITY: And down in the great state of Florida Governor Ron DeSantis continues to be a beacon of hope against his far-left lunacy, as the Florida Board of Education has approved the governor’s rule banning teaching of critical race theory in the state’s public schools. Joining us now for reaction Fox News contributor Jason Chaffetz, along with the mother you just saw in that video, Xi Van Fleet is with us. You were six years old when the Cultural Revolution began in China. And you’ve spoken eloquently about what it was like in school and posters hung in hallways and teachers and students would attack each other for being ideologically in impure. Can you explain what you experienced and the similarities you see?
XI VAN FLEET: Okay, I just want to let the American people know that what’s going on in our school and in our country is really a replay of the Cultural Revolution in China, and I want people to see the similarities and the similarities are terrifying. They use the same ideology, and same methodology, even the same vocabulary. And with the same goal. The ideology is Cultural Marxism. And we were divided into groups as the oppressor and oppressed. And here we use race, and they’re the use class. And the people here who have a different review, were labeled racist. But in the Cultural Revolution, the label is counterrevolutionary. So it is a hat that fits all. And once the hat is on your head, your life is ruined. And the take out methodology is also very similar.
It’s cancel culture, we basically canceled the whole Chinese civilization pre-communism.
And we changed our school names, street names, store names, we changed even our personal names. My name is Xi and I was named after the city I was born, Xi’an. She means West, it also refers to the imperialism. So I wanted so bad to change my name because I want to be more communist. I’m glad my parents convinced me not to. And the vocabulary is even the same wokeness. And to be specific, we use class wokeness. In Chinese it is [phrase spoken in Chinese], your level of wokeness determine your chance to get the promotion or to get benefit and who decide your level of wokeness and is the party leaders.

HANNITY: Yeah, and you speak, and you speak from real experience. I mean, you have six years old, but you live 20 years under this oppression. And it sounds like out of the lessons you learned under Mao, and the revolution. You see this group think now appearing in America and you’re trying to warn Americans that you don’t want to go down this road.

XI VAN FLEET: I just want people to know that freedom is fragile, and we can lose it anytime if we don’t defend it. And there’s a lot of Chinese Americans who have the same experience and share my point of view. And I know that more and more people will still step up and share their stories and tell the American people critical race theory is not anti-racism, it is itself is racist. It’s divisive, it’s destructive, and it is dangerous.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

WALSH: White People Have Been Made Into Our Society‘s Villains And Scapegoats. We Know How This Sort Of Thing Ends.

By Matt Walsh
•Jun 11, 2021 DailyWire.com•

BROOKLYN, NEW YORK, UNITED STATES - 2020/09/05: A participant holding a White Privilege Is The Problem sign at the protest. Brooklynites gathered at Cadman Plaza for a march in the streets of Brooklyn, bringing light to Black Women affected by police violence and to amplify the movement against police brutality and racial injustice. Riders For Black Lives participated by sending bikes to act as a buffer and shield protesters from cars and police. (Photo by Erik McGregor/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Erik McGregor/LightRocket via Getty Images

One of the most consequential — and, as we’ll see, most dangerous — innovations of America’s race hustler constituency is the invention of the term “whiteness.” We used to hear constant condemnations of alleged “white supremacy,” even though white supremacy as a belief system is nearly non-existent in this country, and as a legal principle is entirely non-existent. White supremacists — Klan members, neo-Nazis, and the like — are small, scattered, and insignificant. As for the law, there are no laws on the books today, anywhere, in any state or jurisdiction, that enshrine or codify white supremacy (despite what you may have heard).

Of course, we still hear about this supposed problem of white supremacy, but many of those who once focused on fighting that make-believe scourge have moved on and are these days intent on slaying the dragon known as whiteness. Increasingly, advocates for so-called “racial justice” have widened their lens beyond white supremacy to now include this much broader category which would seem to encompass all white people. White supremacy is a belief system — a fringe belief system, but a belief system all the same. Whiteness, on the other hand, in its most literal sense simply means “the state or quality of being white.” This sheds disturbing light on all of the college courses with titles like “The Problem of Whiteness,” and the calls from academics and activists to “abolish whiteness.” It’s not simply white supremacy they’re after anymore, but whiteness itself.

The way that the race activists get around the obviously horrific implications of this kind of talk is the same way they get around everything else: by manipulating language to obscure the meaning of the words that they use. That’s why, if you go beyond the dictionary and try to find a definition of “whiteness” from the people who use it so often, you’ll end up with a lot of hazy, indeterminate ramblings like this from the Alberta Civil Liberties Research Center, quoting a feminist sociologist named Ruth Frankenberg: whiteness is “a dominant cultural space with enormous political significance, with the purpose to keep others on the margin.”

If that doesn’t clear things up, the National Museum of African American History and Culture has this to say about the cancer known as whiteness:
Whiteness and white racialized identity refer to the way that white people, their customs, culture, and beliefs operate as the standard by which all other groups of are compared. Whiteness is also at the core of understanding race in America. Whiteness and the normalization of white racial identity throughout America’s history have created a culture where nonwhite persons are seen as inferior or abnormal. This white-dominant culture also operates as a social mechanism that grants advantages to white people, since they can navigate society both by feeling normal and being viewed as normal. Persons who identify as white rarely have to think about their racial identity because they live within a culture where whiteness has been normalized.
Meanwhile, Dr. Monnica T Williams writes for Psychology Today that whiteness is “an unfairly privileged exclusionary category, based on physical features, most notably a lack of melanin.”

For this reason, the good doctor explains, white people are not allowed to be proud of their racial identity. She says that she will permit you to be proud of, say, your specific German heritage or French Canadian culture, but you must not be proud to be white in general because “whiteness is a forced group membership that originated by oppressing people of color.” But can black people like her self be proud of their race? Why, of course:
People may then ask why is it okay to be proud of being Black but not White. This is because pride in Blackness represents pride in the accomplishments and resilience of a racialized group in the face of continual oppression. It is healthy for Black people to celebrate these small victories to maintain their self-esteem, despite pervasive social messages of inferiority.
Well, that’s it then. A hallowed “mental health” professional has spoken. It is healthy for black people to be proud of who they are, but it is not healthy for white people. The most healthy mental state for a white person is one of suffocating, never-ending guilt and shame.

This view has become especially common among psychiatrists, psychologists, and psychoanalysts. The entire psycho-industry seems to be fueled by two primary assumptions: gender is fluid, and whiteness is bad. These are also the two primary assumptions of academia, the media, corporate America, and the United States government, but it is especially hazardous in the mental health field because these are the professionals to whom the most mentally vulnerable people are entrusted. And that gives us even more of a reason to be equal parts disgusted and terrified by a paper very recently published in the distinguished, peer-reviewed Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association. In the paper, Dr. Donald Moss, a faculty member of the San Francisco Center for Psychoanalysis and the New York Psychoanalytic Institute, shares his thoughts on the topic of “having whiteness.” If the phrase “having whiteness” makes white identity sound like a disease — as if someone might have whiteness in the same way that they have cancer or chicken pox — well, that is exactly the point.

Here is the abstract:
Whiteness is a condition one first acquires and then one has—a malignant, parasitic-like condition to which “white” people have a particular susceptibility. The condition is foundational, generating characteristic ways of being in one’s body, in one’s mind, and in one’s world. Parasitic Whiteness renders its hosts’ appetites voracious, insatiable, and perverse. These deformed appetites particularly target nonwhite peoples. Once established, these appetites are nearly impossible to eliminate.
Effective treatment consists of a combination of psychic and social-historical interventions. Such interventions can reasonably aim only to reshape Whiteness’s infiltrated appetites—to reduce their intensity, redistribute their aims, and occasionally turn those aims toward the work of reparation. When remembered and represented, the ravages wreaked by the chronic condition can function either as warning (“never again”) or as temptation (“great again”). Memorialization alone, therefore, is no guarantee against regression. There is not yet a permanent cure.
A permanent cure. The language of the “racial justice” is beginning to take on a rather genocidal tone. Here we have medical professionals speaking openly about finding a “permanent cure” for a certain racial identity. And if this was not all bone-chilling enough, I should mention that Dr. Moss has been delivering his thoughts on the whiteness disease in talks to college students, psychoanalysts, and social workers (tickets are only 40 dollars).

One does not need to go back very far in history to see where this sort of thing leads. Our fallen species has, tragically, attempted many experiments with casting an entire group or race of people as villains, subhumans, scapegoats, the cause of all social ills, etc. It never results in anything but bloodshed and misery. It cannot possibly come to any other conclusion.

WATCH:

View: https://youtu.be/i_nczODwkHE
10:11 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
[COMMENT: "Whiteness" is a cultural thing, not a color thing. It is Western civilization - with foundations in Greece and Rome, in individualism and enlightened logical thought. It includes the Judeo-Christian morality, private property ownership, capitalism and meritocracy, among other values.

This is primarily intended as a cultural revolution, not a race war.

Remember this one from the Smithsonian African American Museum ?:

1623496435469.png1623496534486.png1623496659677.png1623496819928.png

This is clearly a Marxist Revolution to reject Western Civilization and all its attributes of "whiteness" as identified above.]
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Victor Davis Hanson: This Isn't Your Father's Left-Wing Revolution

FRIDAY, JUN 11, 2021 - 11:40 PM
Authored by Victor Davis Hanson,

Starry-eyed radicals in the 1960s and 1970s dreamed that they either were going to take over America or destroy it.

One of their favorite mottos was "Change it or lose it," even as protests focused on drugs, music, race, class, sex, fashion -- almost anything and everything.

Sixties radicals tutored America on long hair; wire-rim eyeglasses; who was a drag, a square, a bummer; and who was hip, cool, groovy, mellow and far out. Most of these silly revolutionaries were not unhinged Weathermen killers or SDS would-be communists, but just adolescents along for the good-time ride.

With the end of the draft in 1972, the winding down of the Vietnam War, the oil embargoes and a worsening economy, the '60s revolution withered away. Cynics claimed the revolution was mostly about middle-class students with long hair kicking back during the peak of the postwar boom, indulging their appetites and ensuring they would not end up in Vietnam.

It is not even true that the '60s at least ensured needed reform. The civil rights movement and equal rights for women and gays were already birthed before the hippies, as were folk songs and early rock music.

Instead, what the '60s revolution did was accelerate these trends -- but also radicalize, manipulate and coarsen them.

The grasping "yuppies" of the 1980s were the natural successors to let-it-all-hang-out "hippies." The '60s were at heart a narcissistic free-for-all, when "freedom" often entailed self-indulgence and avoiding responsibility.

By 1981, the Reagan revolution finished off the dead-enders of the Woodstock generation. Most eventually grew up. They rebooted their self-centered drug, sex and party impulses to fixations on money, status and material things.

Sixties protestors mainlined divorce, abortion on demand, promiscuity, drug use and one-parent homes. But by the late 1970s and the 1980s, most veteran cultural revolutionaries had gotten married, were raising a family, bought a house, got a job and made money.

This time around, their offspring's left-wing assault is different -- and far more ominous.



The woke grandchildren of the former outsiders are now more ruthless systematic insiders. The woke and wired new establishment knows how to use money and power to rebirth America as something the founders and most current Americans never envisioned.

Name one mainline institution that the woke left does not now control -- and warp. The media? The campus? Silicon Valley? Professional sports? The corporate boardroom? Foundations? The K-12 educational establishment? The military hierarchy? The government deep state? The FBI top echelon?

The left absorbed them all. But this time around, members of the left really believe that "by any means necessary" is no mere slogan. Instead, it is a model of how to disrupt or destroy American customs, traditions and values.

Woke revolutionaries are not panhandlers, street people or Grateful Dead groupies. They are not even a few nutty and murderous Symbionese Liberation Army terrorists fighting against "the Man."

They are "the Man."

Our 21st century revolutionaries are multibillionaires with flip-flops, tie-dye T-shirts and nose rings, but with the absolute power and desire to censor how half the country communicates -- or cancel them entirely.

They don't flock to campus free-speech areas; they are the campus administrators who ban free speech.

They don't picket outside the Pentagon; they are inside the Pentagon.

They don't chant "eat the rich"; they are the rich who eat at Napa Valley's French Laundry.

They don't protest "uptight" values, because they are more intolerant and puritanical than any Victorian.

They don't believe in racial quotas based on "proportional representation," because they are racists who demand underrepresentation of "bad" racial groups and overrepresentation of "good" groups. The color of our skin is their gospel, not the content of our character.

They are top-down revolutionaries. None of their agendas, from open borders and changing the Constitution to critical race theory and banning clean-burning fossil fuels, are ever favored among a majority of the population.


Their guiding principle is "never let a crisis go to waste." Only in times of a pandemic, a national quarantine or volatile racial relations can the new upscale leftist revolutionaries use fear to push through policies that no one in calm times could stomach.

Our revolutionaries hate dissent. They destroy any who question their media-spun hoaxes.

Truth is their enemy, and fear is their weapon.

Sixties paranoid revolutionaries warned about George Orwell's "1984," but our revolutionaries are "1984."

While this elitist leftist revolution is more dangerous than its sloppy '60s predecessor, it is also more vulnerable, given its obnoxious, top-heavy apparatus -- but only if the proverbial "people" finally say to their madness, "Enough is enough."
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Teachers wary of new laws limiting instruction on race
Laws setting guiderails for classroom instruction on race passed this year in Republican-controlled states have left some teachers worried about how they will be enforced

By KIMBERLEE KRUESI and MICHAEL MELIA Associated Press
June 12, 2021, 8:29 AM

WireAP_b0aa8007346745f7b20f278b4ece5af7_16x9_992.jpg

Video on website 2:08 min

Family speaking out after 2 students were asked to clean cotton in class
According to their mom, the Black twins experienced racism and bullying at a school in another...

NASHVILLE, Tenn. -- As middle school teacher Brittany Paschall assembled a lesson plan on the history of the Negro Baseball Leagues, she wondered how she might have to go about it differently next year under a new Tennessee state law that prohibits teaching certain concepts of race and racism.

The unit was about baseball, but more importantly, it was about segregation and racism in America.

“I kept thinking, in light of this bill, if this were next year, how would I teach this to my students?” said Paschall, an English teacher in Nashville. “Do we teach students to ignore tough subjects?”

Laws setting guiderails for classroom instruction on race passed this year in Republican-controlled states have left some teachers worried about how they will be enforced. Particularly in districts with large numbers of people of color, educators say they worry everyday discussions about students' experiences could land teachers in hot water.

In response to a push for culturally responsive teaching that gained steam following last year's police killing of George Floyd, Republican lawmakers and governors have championed legislation to limit the teaching of material that explores how race and racism influence American politics, culture and law. The measures have become law in Tennessee, Idaho and Oklahoma and bills have been introduced in over a dozen other states.

Professional teachers associations and some school boards have blasted the laws as disrespecting teachers' judgment and opening the door to censorship.

“This is an assault on the craft of teaching,” said Paschall, who is Black. “It’s asking me to show up and ignore parts of my own identity.”

The Tennessee law that takes effect July 1 allows the state education commissioner to withhold funds from any school found to be in violation. Among other things, Tennessee’s teachers can’t instruct that “an individual, by virtue of the individual’s race or sex, is inherently privileged, racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or subconsciously.”

The law still permits ‘impartial discussion of controversial aspects of history,’ but teachers are uncertain how to square that with the main thrust of the legislation, as state officials begin working on finalizing rules on how to implement the new law.

Opposition among teachers is not universal. In a survey by the Tennessee Council for the Social Studies, 64 of 403 members responded with their thoughts on the legislation. While 61% said it would greatly or slightly affect their teaching, 22% said it would likely not or definitely not affect their teaching.

Among the written responses shared anonymously by the council, one of the teachers who said it would not affect their teaching wrote: "Telling students of color they are discriminated against will only serve to make the students feel victimized. This has no place in schools.”

The bills in various states limit the teaching of ideas linked to “critical race theory,” which seeks to reframe the narrative of American history. Its proponents argue that federal law has preserved the unequal treatment of people on the basis of race and that the country was founded on the theft of land and labor.

In the Oklahoma City school district of Millwood, where over 70% of students are Black, Superintendent Cecilia Robinson-Woods said teachers were confused by the implications of the new law's ban on saying certain people are inherently racist or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously.

She said one young Black teacher assigned a project around an issue students want to solve in their community and they came back with topics including gentrification, Jim Crow, mass incarceration and the Tulsa race massacre.

“This is what these kids are thinking about. To say you can't talk about this, it’s impossible,” Robinson-Woods said.

After the new law passed, the teacher asked the superintendent if the project meant he was teaching critical race theory. She told him students in the district's K-12 schools aren't being taught such concepts.

“What you should be doing is having student led-discussions that are balanced," Robinson-Woods said she told the teacher. “So if kids are interested in learning about Green Book, then yeah, they need to learn about Jim Crow as well.”

“We’re not doing anything differently because we don’t believe we’re teaching critical race theory,” she added.

The new law was condemned by school boards in Millwood as well as Oklahoma City, where the board chair, Paula Lewis, said it was a measure in search of a problem because there have been no examples of somebody telling a student they are a white supremacist or an oppressor because of their skin color.

Still, she said, teachers are apprehensive about crossing a line.

“In our mind, it really just adds a layer of fear,” she said.

Tennessee teachers also are eager to see how the new law is interpreted by state officials.
Bianca Martinez, a sixth-grade English teacher in Memphis, points to the difficult conversations her students brought up last year when the class read “Brown Girl Dreaming," a young adult novel on growing up Black in the 1960s in South Carolina and New York.

“In my lesson plans, I didn't have language that said ‘critical race theory,’ ‘systematic racism,’ or ‘privilege’,” she said. “But those conversations came up and they're going to continue to happen.”

“My question is, how are you going to police that?" Martinez said. "And what does violating the measure mean?”
———
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

How An Army of Pissed-Off Moms Are Single-Handedly Destroying The Left’s Marxist Plot
June 12, 2021 (3h ago)
2021.06.12-03.49-revolvernews-60c42ed218580.jpg


The one thing you don’t want to do is mess with a mother and her children.

There’s something that happens inside a woman when she senses that her children are in danger. It’s hard to explain how this type of protective nature works, but it’s very primal, instinctual, and powerful.

And that’s precisely what’s happening right now to scores of mothers across the country, as they watch in horror as their children’s educations are poisoned by an anti-American, anti-white, communist curriculum called “Critical Race Theory.”

Critical Race Theory is a theoretical framework that is rooted in Marxism. It imagines individuals as either oppressed or the oppressor based solely on the color of their skin.

CRT claims that If you’re black, you’re automatically an oppressed person and if you’re white you’re a natural-born oppressor.

When it comes to Critical Race Theory there are no gray areas — it’s black and white — pun intended.

CRT is a toxic anti-white communist ideology that schools are packaging and pumping into the impressionable minds of our nation’s children.

It’s a lethal concoction designed to create a Democrat voting base from cradle to grave and it’s packaged to parents as “compassionate education.”

The reality is that CRT is creating a generation of radicalized political zombies.

And this is why American mothers are mad as hell and fighting back — and thankfully, this army of pissed-off Mama bears are winning the war against this demonic left-wing ideology that’s being used as a weapon of mass destruction against their children.

And it’s not just white moms or conservative moms who are fighting this demonic mind-control — it’s mothers from all walks of life, races, religion, and political backgrounds… and that’s what makes this movement so incredibly powerful.

Fighting Critical Race Theory could be the one thing that bridges the gap and unites this county. That’s how evil and dangerous it is.

A perfect example of that widespread effort is Keisha King, a black mom from Florida who blasted CRT as “racist” during a school board meeting.

Ms. King argued that CRT is racist because it not only divides the nation into two groups: oppressed and oppressor, but she believes CRT also seeks to further victimize blacks while demonizing whites.

Watch:

View: https://youtu.be/7eMpvoBJ8YE
2:05 min

Another black Virginia mom lashed out at the school board, calling CRT “racist” and “abusive.”

Watch:

View: https://youtu.be/WRK9NEZGnTw
1:34 min

Another brave mom who survived MAO’s China, recently tore into a Virginia school board, comparing the left’s radical agenda to Communist China.

Watch:

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1402698268597948423
1:02 min

This mom from Carmel, New York stood before her child’s hostile school board and fought back against CRT in a video clip that went mega-viral.

Watch:

View: https://youtu.be/zxu3wdiXRF0
11:10 min

As a matter of fact, the moms are so fired up that Fox News produced an entire segment highlighting an array of moms who were giving holy hell to their school boards, demanding CRT be removed.

Watch:

View: https://youtu.be/Kgx49-lJrYA
6:36 min

And it’s not just inside the school board meetings that moms are fighting back, there are protests popping up all across the nation of parents fighting against Critical Race Theory.

Watch:

View: https://youtu.be/weuyJFcI_E0
5:28 min

The list of moms fighting CRT goes on and on – we’d be here all week if I posted the mountain of videos that are out there of these brave women standing up for their kids and their families.

It’s clear, by the massive outrage and outpouring that we’re witnessing, that this is the start of a major backlash against the left’s radical agenda.

And this all-important battle for the souls of our children is being waged by a fired-up army of angry moms who are ready to do whatever it takes to save their kids from a progressive future filled with hate and hopelessness.

I don’t think the left realizes the hornet’s nest that they’ve just kicked over… but they’re about to find out, and I can guarantee you this — the American Moms will win this war, hands down.
If you’re an angry Mama bear, get on down to your local school board meeting and join in on the fun. Or, you could even run for the school board and help put these leftist loons out to pasture once and for all.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

House Lawmakers Introduce Antitrust Package to Limit Power of Tech Giants
USMimi Nguyen Ly Jun 12, 2021
House Lawmakers Introduce Antitrust Package to Limit Power of Tech Giants
The logos of Big Tech companies Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google. (Reuters)

Lawmakers in the House of Representatives on Friday unveiled an antitrust package composed of five bills aimed at providing regulators more power to rein in Big Tech companies and potentially force their break up.

The bipartisan initiative is being led by the House Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee leadership, with each of the five bills having a Republican and Democratic co-sponsor. Each of the bills target different ways that tech companies maintain market dominance by potentially abusing their power.

“Right now, unregulated tech monopolies have too much power over our economy,” Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.), chairman of the House Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee, said in a statement Friday. “They are in a unique position to pick winners and losers, destroy small businesses, raise prices on consumers, and put folks out of work.”

“Our agenda will level the playing field and ensure the wealthiest, most powerful tech monopolies play by the same rules as the rest of us,” he added.

david cicilline
House Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law Chair David Cicilline (D-R.I.) speaks during a hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, on July 29, 2020. (Mandel Ngan/Pool/AFP via Getty Images)

The introduction of the antitrust package comes after the Judiciary subcommittee last year released a report (pdf) in October 2020 alleging a range of anti-competitive practices by dominant tech companies Facebook, Google, Amazon, and Apple. The report was a culmination of a 15-month investigation into their business tactics. It was approved on a party-line vote earlier this year, with not much support from Republicans who were hesitant to back some of the recommendations outlined by Democrats in the report.

By registering for the newsletter, you agree to the Privacy Policy.

The report concluded that the four Big Tech giants—while being investigated for different reasons—have engaged in anti-competitive conduct and abused their market power by “charging exorbitant fees, imposing oppressive contract terms, and extracting valuable data from the people and businesses that rely on them.” The report also said that the four companies “have abused their role as intermediaries” to further expand their dominance through practices such as self-preferencing, predatory pricing, and exclusionary conduct.

The “Big Four” companies have rejected allegations in the report that they are abusing their market power, with their CEOs having testified together in July 2020 before Congress as part of the Judiciary panel’s investigation.

The newly unveiled legislative package’s five bills include the “American Innovation and Choice Online Act” (pdf) which seeks to ban discriminatory conduct, including a ban on the dominant platforms favoring their own products and services over other competitors on their platforms.

The “Platform Competition and Opportunity Act” (pdf) seeks to ban dominant platforms from acquiring competitive threats, which includes acquisitions that expand or entrench their market power of the online platforms. Another bill, the “Ending Platform Monopolies Act,” (pdf) would ban tech companies from leveraging their control across multiple businesses to self-preference, or to disadvantage other competitors “in ways that undermine free and fair competition.”

The fourth bill, referred to as the “ACCESS Act” (pdf) aims to promote competition online by requiring online platforms to lower barriers for users and businesses to enter the online marketplace; to have more control over what the companies do with their personal data; and to switch their data to other serves.

The fifth bill, called the “Merger Filing Fee Modernization Act,” (pdf) would update filing fees for mergers “for the first time in two decades” to make sure that the Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission have resources to “aggressively enforce the antitrust laws.”

The Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA), a tech industry group, said in a response that the legislation would “have a severe impact on U.S. economic leadership, and decrease consumers’ ability to enjoy free digital services.”

“Rather than offer broad antitrust reform applicable across the U.S. economy, these proposed regulations focus upon a few companies whose competing products and services are very popular with consumers,” CCIA President Matt Schruers said in a statement. “At a time when consumers are frustrated with higher prices and fewer options in other segments of the economy, it’s perplexing that the Committee would not prioritize broad reform.”

“Writing regulations for a handful of businesses will skew competition and leave consumers worse off,” he added. The House bills “would put the government in charge of industrial organization” and “would stop successful tech companies from providing consumers with the products and services that improve their lives,” he said.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Republicans are fighting Critical Race Theory in all the wrong ways

Critical Race Theory is a serious issue that the Conservative Movement needs to confront head on. However, just attacking the concept itself without providing any solutions will never accomplish anything and will only bring more division... which is probably what a lot of the proponents of CRT actually want.

by Let's Talk Right Now
June 11, 2021

The new thing for Republicans to fight against is Critical Race Theory. As always, the GOP always needs to a bogeyman to fight against, and this issue is no different. However, this can be a confusing statement, as CRT is definitely an issue that we cannot tolerate.

Critical Race Theory is, in and of itself, racist. Many have a difficult time explaining what it is. Dr Karlyn Borysenko posted a brief description on Twitter that I’d like to post here to help give you a frame of reference regarding this important issue:
Critical Race Theory is an ideology started in academia in the 70s that says racism exists everywhere – in every person and system – and the job of the critical theorist is to assess HOW (not if) racism occurred in any circumstance.
Racism is always ASSUMED to have occurred.

Another way to think of critical race theory is this: It’s the opposite of what Martin Luther King preached. It’s the idea that we should judge people on the basis of their race, that someone’s race is the only thing that matters about them, not the content of their character.
So why is all of this problematic, as the kids say.

When you start with a conclusion – that racism has occurred – and work your way back from that conclusion, that’s confirmation bias.

You’ll only look at information that supports your conclusion.

If you are LOOKING for racism in everything, you will inevitably FIND racism in everything.

You will misconstrue the most innocent thing as being a symbol of racism.

You will also ignore data that contradicts your point, so you’re not showing the full spectrum of information.

All that leads to the conclusion being confirmed.

And anyone who disagrees with you or points out all the information you ignored is fragile.

When you start with the conclusion, you leave no room for a real THEORY to develop.
I can’t think of a better explanation of Critical Race Theory and why we should strongly oppose it. However, I want to bring this full circle.

Remember how I said earlier that Republicans are using CRT as a bogeyman to fight against?

Yeah, the GOP is notorious for being an opposition party. They always need something to fight against. Even when they have control of both chambers of Congress and the White House, they’ll rarely get anything done because they need something to fight against in order to raise money and get re-elected. If they solve all of our problems, how will they stay in power? In their mind they a bogeyman to fight against.

Now, as Conservatives, we need to fight against CRT and expose it for what it is: racist. But we cannot stop with just exposing it or banning it from our schools. We have to provide a positive solution. That takes some intellectual honesty.

We have to point out that the system today IS racist. It IS rigged against minorities. However, it’s not because of Conservative values or because the ideals that make up the American principles are racist. No, it’s because the power-hungry Democrats and RINOs have setup the system to keep minorities down so that they might control and manipulate them to stay in power. As always, they are doing nothing more than creating chaos to provide a “solution.” The only winners are the elites in power.

The winning strategy is to show how our Conservative values are more than just “opposing Critical Race Theory.” We have to point out not only how the system is racist, but why… and then provide the solution. As always, the solution is always less government and more freedom, liberty and opportunity for all.

I explain more in detail during this episode of Let’s Talk Right Now, so definitely take a listen. However, at the same time, make sure that you understand Critical Race Theory and how to provide the proper solution to the problem. I guarantee you, it’s not the solution being promoted by Black Lives Matter and the Democrats.

It’s time to actually follow up with action. One way that you can do that right now is to donate to Gabrielle Clark’s fundraising efforts. Gabrielle is suing her son’s school district because of the implementation of Critical Race Theory against her son, demanding that he attach labels such as “oppressor” and “privileged.” This is a landmark case that can set a national precedence.

Rumble video on website 46:32 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

VIDEO: Students say the American flag symbolizes oppression

Ophelie Jacobson | Reporter
Saturday, June 12, 2021 3:00 AM

View: https://youtu.be/rpYdl2vVRcA
5:14 min

With Flag Day coming up on Monday, June 14, Campus Reform reporter Ophelie Jacobson went to The University of Texas at Dallas to talk with students about what the American flag means to them.

Jacobson asked students to say the first thing they think of is when they see the American flag.

“A lot of things come to mind. First of all, war. Second of all, we’ve also taken a bit of land from Native Americans so that’s unfortunate too. And it’s just really terrible that we’ve done all these things and this flag kind of reminds me of that, of all the sins we’ve committed against others,” one student said.

Another student said the flag has negative connotations attached to it such as nationalism, exclusiveness, and selfishness.

When Jacobson asked if students knew what day June 14 was, students thought it was Juneteenth, a holiday that is celebrated on June 19 instead.

Watch the full video above to see if students believe we should have a day celebrating the American flag.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Jun122021

Wokism Gives Chinese Immigrants Déjà Vu
Immigrants to the USA who survived the nightmarish Cultural Revolution in communist China are experiencing déjà vu. They escaped from a situation similar to the one emerging here, as intolerantly woke liberals achieve ever more power. The main difference is that capitalism has been so successful in the USA that Marxists had to abandoned class warfare for race hate. Take it from Virginia mom Xi Van Fleet, who stood up to the leftists running local schools:
“I’ve been very alarmed by what’s going on in our schools,” Xi Van Fleet told the Loudoun County School Board members. “You are now teaching, training our children to be social justice warriors and to loathe our country and our history.”
Comparing critical race theory to the Cultural Revolution, Van Fleet recalled what school was like during that maelstrom of moonbattery:
“One of the teachers was considered bourgeoisie because she liked to wear pretty clothes,” Van Fleet said. “So the students attacked her and spit on her. She was covered with spit… and pretty soon it became violence.”
The American equivalent is to denounce teachers for having “white privilege.” According to liberal dogma, all whites are guilty of this, and any are subject to cancelation if they fail to demonstrate sufficient hatred of their own race. Here as in China, the politically driven malice has escalated to violence.

Officials forced her to limit her speech to 1 minute. She packed a lot into it:
Her comparison of the moonbats running Loudoun County schools to the likeminded maniacs who brought hell to earth in China is apt. A group of current and former teachers were recently exposed for compiling a list of thought criminals to harass and intimidate. Teachers critical of radical brainwashing have been suppressed. For example, teacher Tanner Cross was suspended for refusing to pretend that boys can be girls and vice versa.

Cross stood firm and was reinstated by a judge while his lawsuit continues, proving that pushback works. In contrast, apologizing to our version of the Red Guard not only is contemptible but does not work.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

‘We’re in incredible danger’: The GOP’s assault on education and history is based in Nazi ideology and obsessed with protecting white supremacy

Posted at 4:08 pm on June 12, 2021 by Brett T.

The mainstream media outlets might be afraid of it because conservatives use it, but we love Substack; it gives writers an opportunity to promote their work without having to be part of the corporate media machine. It also eschews the editorial constraints of the corporate media and lets people say what they really feel.

Political analyst and associate professor Jared Yates Sexton is on Substack, and his latest looks at the GOP’s assault on education and history, which is fascist, based on Nazi ideology, and obsessed with maintaining white supremacy. His thread goes on a bit, but it gives a very good idea of how progressives are reacting to things like the public pushback against critical race theory, so buckle up:
Honestly, I don't know how to stress this enough.
The GOP's assault on education and history is a fascist attack based in Nazi ideology and is obsessed with power, control, and the protection of murderous white supremacy.

We're in incredible danger.

1/The War Over Reality and Control: Critical Race Theory As An Opening For Fascist Power
— Jared Yates Sexton (@JYSexton) June 11, 2021
Yesterday, as a political measure, the state of Florida, pushed by the GOP, banned the teaching of "critical race theory," or the investigation of systems of power, racism, and oppression.
This isn't innocuous. It is a literal replaying of Nazi totalitarianism.
2/ pic.twitter.com/BuiHmtYHCi
— Jared Yates Sexton (@JYSexton) June 11, 2021
“Literal.”

Underneath all of it is the concept of "Cultural Marxism," or the idea that there is a secret conspiracy by communists, Jews, and liberal traitors, to destroy the culture of the country and unseat systems of power.
It is paranoid, fascist, and can be murderous.
3/ pic.twitter.com/YT2Dd9sPGm
— Jared Yates Sexton (@JYSexton) June 11, 2021
Hitler created his power base on this very conspiracy theory and presented it as an existential threat to Germans.
The "poison" of cultural Marxism, he claimed, was making people question the state and was priming them for a revolution. It required extreme measures.
4/ pic.twitter.com/O6ciJtEZDD
— Jared Yates Sexton (@JYSexton) June 11, 2021
What we're not often taught is that Nazis controlled Germany not just through speeches, but a total domination of culture.
"Degenerate" art and culture was outlawed and determined as anything that made people question Germany's greatness or white supremacy.
5/ pic.twitter.com/psVTqIs5Ns
— Jared Yates Sexton (@JYSexton) June 11, 2021
To solidify control, the Nazis banned degenerate art, claiming it was part of a conspiracy against the Germans, and instead replaced it with culture that reaffirmed their identity and purpose.
It was supposed to be patriotic. It was controlling, and radicalizing.
6/ pic.twitter.com/0RW4Gni8Cd
— Jared Yates Sexton (@JYSexton) June 11, 2021
What resulted was a cult of personality and a suicidal devotion to the state and Hitler.
All dissenting opinions were outlawed and cultured devoured itself, creating a madness that made fascism, warmongering, and genocide possible.
7/ pic.twitter.com/cIPeJnbjMs
— Jared Yates Sexton (@JYSexton) June 11, 2021
A prime part of the Nazi totalitarian plan involved the takeover of education, claiming it was "indoctrinating" students, they took it over in totality and, predictably, made it an aggressive engine of actual indoctrination.
They captured generations of citizens.
8/ pic.twitter.com/7xzNdDrYtz
— Jared Yates Sexton (@JYSexton) June 11, 2021
Actual information and history was taken from students and it was replaced with propaganda and religious worship of the state and Hitler.
This takeover was meticulous, aggressive, and one of the main reasons fascism was able to gain its foothold and power.
9/ pic.twitter.com/tSvX5ckyVO
— Jared Yates Sexton (@JYSexton) June 11, 2021
But we don't need to start in Germany. In America, in response to the Russian Revolution, the original Red Scare created the same paranoia and made possible widespread violence and aggressive indoctrination, in media, in education, everywhere.
10/ pic.twitter.com/YwmiFQQzAR
— Jared Yates Sexton (@JYSexton) June 11, 2021
Fear of "cultural Marxism" in America, the same conspiracy theory that made Nazism possible, spread through the United States, creating race massacres, lynchings, and a general oppression that hurt people of color, women, LGBTQ, as well as unions and leftists.
11/ pic.twitter.com/L4dMAxwdLk
— Jared Yates Sexton (@JYSexton) June 11, 2021
The incident more people are familiar with is the second Red Scare, or McCarthyism, which was a proto-Qanon movement that took over the GOP and allowed the Right to destroy FDR's New Deal coalition via spreading conspiracy theories and paranoia.
12/ pic.twitter.com/hERBKoc6rf
— Jared Yates Sexton (@JYSexton) June 11, 2021
The second Red Scare was able to create a silent oppression with America where citizens were so afraid of being spotlit as a traitor or part of the communist conspiracy that they often had to hide who they were and what they believed.
It was soft totalitarianism.
13/ pic.twitter.com/D9FKlgiUdJ
— Jared Yates Sexton (@JYSexton) June 11, 2021
Of course, the Civil Rights Movement created a crisis in America that revealed what hid behind the soft totalitarianism.
Again, as white supremacy was challenged, the paranoia, violence, and oppression was forced to rear its head and expose the fascism underneath.
14/ pic.twitter.com/vuxcFCj1j1
— Jared Yates Sexton (@JYSexton) June 11, 2021
The struggle for Civil Rights was turned into yet another communist conspiracy as the Right came to believe the marches and protests were secret communist operations that meant to destroy America.
It was, yet again, the same fascist conspiracy theory.
15/ pic.twitter.com/9oiZlwqIiv
— Jared Yates Sexton (@JYSexton) June 11, 2021
Southern leaders and white supremacists were quite open during Civil Rights in their belief that Black Americans were being manipulated by Russia and that it was all a giant communist conspiracy.
Even question white supremacy was considered treason.
16/ pic.twitter.com/vaATVX5viM
— Jared Yates Sexton (@JYSexton) June 11, 2021CNN's Jim Acosta dismisses Fox News's Tucker Carlson as a 'race-baiting tyrant' in scathing podcast interview
Notice how they always call Democrat leaders “Southern” instead of Democrat?

The violence against Civil Rights protesters was considered self-defense, America defending itself against communist infiltration and an insidious plot, again by Jews, communists, leftist traitors, and people of color being manipulated into joining.
17/ pic.twitter.com/p5RmQjtfij
— Jared Yates Sexton (@JYSexton) June 11, 2021
If this sounds familiar, it should.
Black Lives Matter was treated as a conspiracy, a manufactured movement that was being directed by shadowy forces and ultimately focused on destroying America's foundations, creating distrust, and ultimately leading to the end of the US.
18/ pic.twitter.com/n7vFRoHw8h
— Jared Yates Sexton (@JYSexton) June 11, 2021
What we're experiencing RIGHT NOW is the same Judeo-Bolshevik conspiracy theory that animated the Nazis and fascists.
It's a different version, an update, but it is the animating force of the GOP and the Right.
It operates exactly the same way and demands action.
19/ pic.twitter.com/fwrgvqxyfm
— Jared Yates Sexton (@JYSexton) June 11, 2021
The focus now is George Soros and other "Jewish puppetmasters."
This is ultimately what's at the heart of the anti-CRT, anti-"woke" movement.
It is a fascistic, antisemetic conspiracy theory meant to provoke violence and oppression.
20/ pic.twitter.com/T805aMUHku
— Jared Yates Sexton (@JYSexton) June 11, 2021
By capturing the education system, the Right intends to forcefully reassert white supremacy as benevolence, or the idea that white people have exploited and murdered people of color out of good intentions and in the pursuit of progress.
21/White Supremacy As Benevolence: The Myth of the Civilizer
— Jared Yates Sexton (@JYSexton) June 11, 2021
And, it is yet another front in the GOP's war to dismantle democratic institutions considering they are historically unpopular and that white supremacy and hypercapitalistic exploitation are in crisis and in danger of being unseated.
22/The Intentional Dismantling of Democracy
— Jared Yates Sexton (@JYSexton) June 11, 2021
But make no mistake.
This isn't about CRT.
It's about walling off information, about instituting "patriotic," white supremacist education that ensures people don't understand systems of power and promoting militaristic self-destruction within the population.
23/ pic.twitter.com/KVtZqyh6Jh
— Jared Yates Sexton (@JYSexton) June 11, 2021
Narrator: This is about CRT.
Things are…escalating.
We've been watching this for years and trying to warn people that fascism is growing and festering in the US.
It CAN and HAS happened here. This time it is an insidious new strain and it's only growing with every passing day.
24/
— Jared Yates Sexton (@JYSexton) June 11, 2021
Again, I cannot stress this enough. This is an incredibly dangerous moment, and people need to recognize it immediately.
Denying it and pretending like this will solve itself only gives these people room to grow and spread.
This is a five-alarm fire. Raging.
25/25
— Jared Yates Sexton (@JYSexton) June 11, 2021
Calm down son
— Michael (@QuestforOrion) June 12, 2021
Sir, this is a Wendy’s.

Notice how Gov. Ron DeSantis has become the stand-in for Donald Trump now that he’s out of office?

And when did the Right capture the education system? Sexton mentions McCarthyism but doesn’t note that it’s now teachers and school board members keeping lists of troublesome parents and looking for hackers to infiltrate their anti-CRT websites. It’s groups like Antifa that are policing speech and meeting free expression with violence. And the co-founder of Black Lives Matter describes herself as a trained Marxist, so if you’re sad because the American people at large oppose Marxism, that’s too bad.
Who runs the education system top to bottom? Certainly not The Right.
— Practicing Neanderthal (@realchriswire) June 12, 2021
The Left has already captured the education system.
— Magdeburg (@TallowWolves) June 12, 2021
That is such a damn lie!
The Right has no such intentions.
We want to counter the destructive and downright evil Marxism taught by the Left, who already controls the education system.
Saying the Right wants to reassert white supremacy makes you a liar.
And you know it.
— I Remember The Tiananmen Square Massacre (@SantasTavern) June 12, 2021
The left has been indoctrinating our kids with their ideology for decades. From graphic sex education in kindergarten to outright socialism being taught in colleges they have used education to spread their ideology and silenced anyone who disagreed
— RW (@rwlawoffice) June 12, 2021
The left has captured the education system and brainwashed our children for too long. You’re a crazy leftist conspiracy theorists.
— RedVirgoStacy (@stacy_redvirgo) June 12, 2021
If true, it seems that a system built on allowing individuals to pursue their own self-interests with laws to constrain the worst abuses would be vastly superior to unchecked good intentions and pursuit of progress.
— Lee Jordan (@TheRealLeejo) June 12, 2021
If such thinking, as you just declared, is not alien to you and to your experience, I assume it is because it matches your view of what it is to be white.
Society needs to be protected, but not from white people— just white people like you.
Seriously. That is sociopathy.
— Crews Giles (@CrewsGiles) June 12, 2021
This 100% WHITE PERSON said THAT pic.twitter.com/xQiY9lM7Gl
— Sunchaser (@Sunchasegirl) June 12, 2021
It doesn't matter that Fascism is *not* growing in the US
What matters is that the divide between BlueAnon psychos and regular people is growing at an alarming rate
CNN And MSNBC mainstream BlueAnon psychosis and eventually the pot will boil over https://t.co/EwSWJldQZ1
— Tim Pool (@Timcast) June 12, 2021
Of course the left says the inverse
Fox news is pushing Q Anon, fascism is on the rise
I find it quite funny actually
— Tim Pool (@Timcast) June 12, 2021
Q Anon is not mainstream, it is not on Fox news
Tucker lost viewers for calling out Sidney powell
However CNN and MSNBC havent change at all and still push insane BlueAnon conspiracy
— Tim Pool (@Timcast) June 12, 2021
Republicans expelled a member over racist tweets and he eventually lost a primary and is gone
The Squad can do anything and everything in the book and be protected by Democrats
Even Marjorie Taylor Greene was targeted by the GOP
— Tim Pool (@Timcast) June 12, 2021
Republicans are mostly moderate and thus unwilling to burn down cities to get what they want
Meanwhile we have over $2B in damage from BLM and Antifa riots
The best the right can muster is Desantis and only in Florida
— Tim Pool (@Timcast) June 12, 2021
From what I can tell, the difference between Q-Anon and BlueAnon, is that most people on the Right don't take Q-Anon conspiracies seriously, but BlueAnon's conspiracies are widely encouraged by the MSM.
They just keep fanning the flames.
— Conan the Bernsbarian (@EarlNoahBernsby) June 12, 2021
What the hell is wrong with you? Are you so devoid of any redeeming characteristics that you have to make shit up to try to find friends?
— Dr's Buried Chest High (@ProdigiousMrsB) June 12, 2021
You use your own articles to prove something? Couldn't find others?
— Angelica Rivera (@gelrivera90) June 12, 2021
What? He just proved how DeSantis is freely borrowing from Nazi ideology to impose conservative fascism on the American public.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Whistleblowers Say Military Forcing Anti-American Indoctrination
By
Faye Higbee
-June 12, 2021

The US Military is rapidly sinking into the swamp of hatred and distrust, according to Senator Tom Cotton. Whistleblowers say the Military has been forcing anti-American indoctrination across the service branches. Senator Cotton confronted Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin at a Senate hearing on June 10, but was met with the usual statements of such training being important to “diversity and inclusiveness.”

whistleblowers say

Screenshot: combination
In a Senate hearing with Austin, Cotton claimed that within the military, there’s “plummeting morale, growing mistrust between races and sexes where none existed just six months ago and unexpected retirements and separations based on these trainings alone.”

One whistleblower, Cotton alleged, said that military history training was replaced with training about police brutality, “systemic racism,” and “white privilege.” Another said that his unit had to read “White Fragility” by feminist author and critical theory proponent Robin DiAngelo, according to the senator…

“It’s about a very specific kind of anti-American indoctrination that is seeping into some parts of our military, based on the whistleblower complaints we have received,” he said.

“The military for decades has been one of the institutions in society where you are most likely to get ahead based on your own performance, your own merit, irrespective of the color of your skin, where you came from, who your parents were.”
Tom Cotton, Epoch Times
While Austin agreed that his own position in the US Military was an example of being able to get ahead, he thinks the training is useful to make the military “a bit better.” He also thinks that the training will make a more “lethal” fighting force. With what whistleblowers say, it appears to be doing the exact opposite of team building or making a cohesive unit.

Whistleblowers say that CRT (Critical Race Theory) has infiltrated every corner of our society at this point and it is creating division rather than unity. From teaching children to hate their country and view people of other races as “oppressors,” to making sure the Military can’t work together is a divisive tactic used by Communist/Marxist regimes worldwide. Now it has become part and parcel of our Armed Forces – a terrible, devastating mistake.

We are teaching our children to be social justice warriors and to loathe our country and our history. Growing up in China, all of this sounds very familiar. The Communist regime use the same critical theory is to divide people. The only difference is that used class instead of race. This is indeed the American version of the Chinese cultural revolution…I just want to let the American people know that what is going on in our schools and in our country is really a replay of the cultural revolution in China.

Critical Race Theorists use the same ideology, the same methodology, even the same vocabulary.

The ideology is cultural Marxism.


Xi Van Fleet, Communist purge Survivor, Parent
Whistleblowers say that the “woke” brigade has successfully infiltrated schools, and even the ranks of our Military. In April, a GOP Congress member demanded that CRT teachings be removed from West Point Military Academy as we previously reported. The rest of the branches are steeped in the same division and politics of the far left that full-on Communist countries have experienced.

Everyone was upset when the Communist cadet and an instructor at West Point were revealed…but now it has blossomed into a widespread poison.

When Space Force fired Lt Col Matt Lohmeier from his position because he spoke out against CRT on his own time, it should have been a giant wakeup call. These actions are just the tip of the proverbial iceberg for what is to come.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Shows Aimed at Children See 222% Increase in LGBTQ Characters and Stories in Just Two Years

4,968
From top left going clockwise, two moms on Good Luck Charlie, Blue's Clues Pride Parade, Cyrus Goodman and his boyfriend on the Disney TV Show, Andi Mack, and a lesbian wedding on Steven Universe. (Disney, Nickelodeon, Cartoon Network)
Disney Channel, Nickelodeon, Cartoon Network
WARNER TODD HUSTON11 Jun 20211,374

A veritable tidal wave of gay representation has washed over children’s TV shows, with a 222 percent increase in LGBTQ characters and stories between 2017 and 2019 alone.

As June Pride Month continues, Insider took stock of children’s TV and found that in the last decade, cartoons and live-action shows aimed at kids on networks including Disney, Nickelodeon, Cartoon Network, and others have seen an explosion of gay content.
In one bullet point, for instance, Insider discovered that gay content aimed at kids had increased a tremendous amount in only a few years:

1623562352509.png
1623562309559.png

The review of cartoons found a whopping 259 gay characters in cartoons and TV series aimed at kids.

Representation includes child characters with gay parents, characters that are transgender or gay, and stories about “inclusion” and sexual identity.

Gay culture has been part of programing for children for a long time, Insider notes, adding, “But in the past decade, small-screen animation has undergone a noticeable shift.

Representation in children’s cartoons, in particular, has increased in frequency, nuance, and overtness.”

For the last decade, the entertainment industry has engaged in a concerted, industry-wide effort to push the radical LGBTQ agenda into all programs for children in cooperation with gay activist group GLAAD.

GLAAD has convinced Hollywood to increase the representation of the LGBTQ agenda into programing, and the networks, including Nickelodeon, PBS, Cartoon Network, and others, have signed onto that effort. At this point, nearly every TV series, whether cartoon-based or live-action, has added gay characters in obedience to this agenda.

Breitbart News recently reported on 13 major kids’ shows that contain gay characters or storylines.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Excellent! Combatting Social Justice Rhetoric: A Cheat Sheet for Policy Makers (Video)

By Richard Abelson
Published June 13, 2021 at 2:15pm

Finally, an excellent tool to make clear the language of social justice–
Oregon scholars Dr. Bruce Gilley and Dr. Peter Boghossian discuss the new graphic tool that reveals the truth behind social justice rhetoric.


The vanguard of academic Free Speech, Professors Bruce Gilley, Peter Boghossian and James Lindsay, have published a handy guide »Responding to Social Justice Rhetoric«:

When they say “Cultural Competence“, what they mean is: Cultural stereotyping, which is neo-racist indoctrination in Critical Race Theory, and an ineffective method with no basis is scientific evidence.

When they say “Environmental Justice“, what they mean is: Environmental issues are race issues, which is using environmental protection for unrelated political puposes, and an ineffective way to protect the environment.

When they say “Decolonization“, what they mean is: Removing European influence, which is an attempt to deligitimize the US as a “colonial project”, and replacing the universal equality of the European tradition with illiberal non-European “traditions”.

When they say “Systemic Racism“, what they mean is: Differences are always due to systems, which is an attribution of group differences to vague “systems” imposed by others, and an attempt to “dismantle” freedoms and to forcibly redistribute public and private goods.

When they say “Critical Race Theory“, what they mean is: Race-centered thinking, which is the view that racism is baked into the system and inescapable, that racism is present even if no one is racist, and the view that all disparities in group outcomes are due to racist systems.

When they say “Equity“, what they mean is: Equality of Outcomes, which is a violation of equality before the law, a dismantling of the foundations of a free society, and state management of society, including reparations.

When they say “Social Justice“, what they mean is: Group entitlements, which is a denial of social and cultural differences, of just rewards to individuals who follow the law and act fairly, and the reframing of particular political demands as universal moral imperatives.

When they say “Diversity“, what they mean is: An identity-based approach to society, which is a violation of individual identity, enforced political conformity, political quotas, an attack on merit and a form of soft bigotry.

When they say “White Privilige / Supremacy“, what they mean is: European moral culpability, which is racist scapegoating, especially against economically disadvantaged Europeans, neo-racist scapegoating reborn as “progressive” group stereotyping.

When they say “BIPOC Folx“, what they mean is: Non-European people, which is used for neo-racist policies and stereotypes, racism reborn as “progressive”.

When they say “Racial Justice“, what they mean is: Racial Favoritism, which is using anti-discrimination laws for unrelated political purposes, a violation of equality before the law, and neo-racist group stereotyping.

When they say “Inclusion“, what they mean is: Restricted speech and justification for purges, which is making people feel “welcomed” by banning anything they find offensive; an attack on freedoms of association and speech.


SJW-Rhetoric.jpg


Here is the video.

View: https://youtu.be/kZtEG7cBmCc
8:45 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Patriot Steve Daniels is Unlawfully Arrested at Arizona Rally – This is a HUGE 1st Amendment Violation (Video)

By Jordan Conradson
Published June 13, 2021 at 9:49pm
3AC7C072-94C3-4C27-BBC7-14D682C088D6.jpeg


On Wednesday at the Chandler, Arizona school board meeting, patriot Steve Daniels was unlawfully arrested while peacefully protesting critical race theory curriculum, masking of children, and barring parents from public meetings.

Daniels posted a live stream to his Facebook page, where an officer asks him, “Can I ask you if would mind standing over here, so we can clear a path for you? I’m not going to ask you to stop doing anything else.”

This was 35 minutes into the video.

Daniels submitted to his request and began to speak about the current state of our nation and the suppression of our voices.

At 37 minutes, police grabbed Steve Daniels and promptly arrested him.

In America today, they are arresting patriots because our voices are too powerful.


Steve’s full live stream can be found at:

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=203892754919072&id=100058950455783

Here is another video of this clear infringement.

Rumble video on website 2:03 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

COMEDIAN USES SCIENCE TO CHART EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENT OF WOKE PEOPLE
BRODIGAN
JUNE 13, 2021

You can't argue with science. Or, people who say the word science. Science teaches us that. While some lesser people try to deny science, there is nothing it can't explain away. Take woke dingleberries, for example. You might think they are the product of a political party exploiting low information voters to promote a radical agenda. It turns out, according to scientific research, the woke are just the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.

JP Sears compiled his years of research into the following video. I'm not one for hyperbole, but this could very well lead to the Scopes Monkey Trial of the modern era.

View: https://youtu.be/fclA1hETGC0
7:43 min
You had a primitive people known as Homo Sapiens.
I had a kid in my 8th-grade science class ask if people are classified as Homo Sapiens, does that mean gay people are classified as "Homo Sexual?" That has nothing to do with this video, but it still makes me laugh when I hear Homo Sapien. Thank God that kid didn't have Twitter in 1987.
They survived using primitive skills using strength, bravery, intelligence, and productivity. And most interestingly, their species only had two genders. Then the Homo Sapien evolved into Homo Sapien Justicus, most commonly known as social justice warriors. That led us to the current paleowokealithic era that created the conditions for the HomoSapien Non-Binary Wokticus to survive. More commonly referred to as "The Woke."
One trait these lifeforms also developed was the ability to shed branding when that branding became too toxic. Much like the way reptiles shed skin. Hence, once SJWs became the butt of what's commonly referred to as "jokes," these new lifeforms rebranded themselves. Similar to Marxism becoming Critical Race Theory.

You don't need to be a scientist to guess what happened from there.
Intelligence evolved into outrage. Freedom evolved into obedience. Love evolved into hate. Self-Responsibility evolved into socialism.
Also, women evolved into birthing people, and white men evolved into everything wrong with everything.

Sears is a comedian. This is a work of satire and we're all having a good laugh. But like with a lot of satire, you take a kernel of truth and blow it out in ridiculous and hysterical directions. The kernel of truth here is that wokeness, or the people who promote it, are in fact predatory. Comedy is a great way to illustrate that.

As is showing up at school board meetings, and voting out any "leader" who unironically considers themselves "woke."

View: https://youtu.be/zXb96IKG45U
1:19 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Marxist Thinkers Invented Critical Race Theory (CRT) to Upend Society – Stack of Stuff Part 4
BY SKIP / 13 JUNE 2021
Ashleigh-CRT-instructor.png

It isn’t just that Critical Race Theory interests us, we are alarmed that such a Liberty and anti-Constitutional movement has gained so much in so little time.

I do believe that there is enough material out there that GraniteGrok could pile up days upon days of posts on Critical Race Theory and not run out for a long number of said days.

And yes, in reality, this is not just some overnight success. It is the proverbial “takes 12 years to become an overnight success.” And now it is a movement that is working to remove our heritage; that all men are equal (even if we didn’t start that way; our aspirations have always been to better this union) and replace it, as the Democrats forced upon us (and continue to do so) that a person is measured solely by the color of their skins.

Yet, Democrats are racists a THEY are the ones behind this effort. So let’s show what the Democrat Party wishes upon us, shall we? But first, we’ll take a gander of someone who is against it (harshes the race-baiters’ Narrative, doesn’t it?):

Marxist thinkers invented critical race theory (CRT) in order to upend society by claiming that hidden racism pervades American institutions. CRT teaches people to seize on any racial disparity as ipso facto proof of racial discrimination, despite the clear prohibitions on racial discrimination in federal law. Advocates claim that the American status quo is racist — if not “white supremacist” — so extreme measures to reverse historic injustices are the only “anti-racist” option.

Critical race theory teaches Americans to focus on skin color, reversing the ethic of Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech. It often involves demonizing “whiteness,” which some activists have defined as including everything from a good work ethic to capitalism to Christianity.
Mayor Joyce Craig says she has enacted diversity training for city workers, but her office won’t share specifics on what that entails.

Last month, Craig told WMUR’s Adam Sexton that diversifying the city government’s workforce is a priority.

“We have training for all our city employees, for diversity and cultural competency,” Craig said. “It has been an exciting opportunity for everyone here that is front-facing.”

Since that interview, NHJournal has repeatedly asked Craig and her administration for access to the materials used in this “all employee” training. Craig’s office has declined.

Just another reason why she should be defeated at the next election – who wants a Mayor that is against open and transparent Government. Oh yeah, Democrats.
The Walt Disney Corporation has ordered all headquarters employees to attend seminars that inject critical race theory, “systemic racism,” “white privilege,” and “white fragility” into their training. The way that City Journal’s Christopher Rufo describes what’s contained in the whistleblower documents he received from several Disney employees suggests the training regimen is designed to elicit guilt and shame from white employees while falsifying history.

…The core of Disney’s racial program is a series of training modules on “antiracism.” In one, called “Allyship for Race Consciousness,” the company tells employees that they must “take ownership of educating [themselves] about structural anti-Black racism” and that they should “not rely on [their] Black colleagues to educate [them],” because it is “emotionally taxing.” The United States, the document claims, has a “long history of systemic racism and transphobia,” and white employees, in particular, must “work through feelings of guilt, shame, and defensiveness to understand what is beneath them and what needs to be healed.” Disney recommends that employees atone by “challeng[ing] colorblind ideologies and rhetoric” such as “All Lives Matter” and “I don’t see color”; they must “listen with empathy [to] Black colleagues” and must “not question or debate Black colleagues’ lived experience.”

Way to go Disney – calling out their Black employees for being weak and stupid. That’s a great policy from the Imagineers: Whites must diminish themselves because Black are unable to raise themselves up. In that one bolded statement, Disney basically said that Blacks are inferior to Whites. Hey, it’s the Old South Democrat / KKK messaging all over again! There’s more but that starts the racist Disney ball rolling. And the messaging in this next bit is???

In another module, called “What Can I Do About Racism?,” Disney tells employees that they should reject “equality,” with a focus on “equal treatment and access to opportunities,” and instead strive for “equity,” with a focus on “the equality of outcome.” The training also includes a series of lessons on “implicit biases,” “microaggressions,” and “becoming an antiracist.” The company tells employees that they must “reflect” on America’s “racist infrastructure” and “think carefully about whether or not your wealth, income, treatment by the criminal justice system, employment, access to housing, health care, political power, and education might be different if you were of a different race.” (Author’s emphasis )

Yeah, the”Happiest place on Earth is pushing Socialism – the maker of the Most Miserable Places on Earth with that “equality of outcome” which makes us all the same. Imagine that – all the Imagineers being all the same with the same exact results – equality of outcome. And this is what Disney wants for us all?

So, there is such a thing as “Government Speech”? Just another name for Propaganda. Catch that “generally considered” bit below. That lawyer, John Edison, should be disbarred for going along with this nonsense.
So there it is. A public school system in Minnesota has deemed “Black Lives Matter” and other various slogans to be privileged “official government speech,” thus making them “uniquely privileged” “official government speech,” generally considered to be exempt from challenge by dissenting opinion ordinarily protected under the First Amendment. Rochester Public School board members unanimously approved a sweeping resolution that authorizes the superintendent to actively promote the slogans Black Lives Matter, Brown Lives Matter, Indigenous Lives Matter, All Are Welcome Here, and Stop Asian Hate…
Moreover, RPS Superintendent Michael Muñoz is also directed to take all actions “that further the objectives” of the resolution, including by approving “messaging, signage, and visuals” for the slogans. The district also adopted the six-color “pride flag” as “government speech” to support “a message of inclusion” within schools, according to Just the News.

As reported by the local ABC News affiliate, KAAL TV, the school board claimed the resolution was a “legal defense move.” It’s the “Why is it a necessary legal defense?” question that should not be a shock to anyone. And here’s the answer, per KAAL:

By declaring certain phrases involving the Black Lives Matter movement as government speech, the board is protecting itself from legal action because it is allowing one type of speech, but not any speech in opposition to those phrases.

John Edison, the Rochester Public Schools attorney told KAAL:

“So here with adopting the messages that you’re adopting as government speech, you’re saying these are the messages that we’re communicating as a school district, and by doing that we’re not also creating a forum to allow other types of speech to enter the forum.

Who knew that Government worker Janice Starkey of the Hanover School District had heard of it and believes that Silencing others that go against the Government Policies is both allowed and right? So Government Speech is that speech made up by politicians and government workers to shut the rest of us up? Starkey thinks so!

Don’t like something (as we are seeing) that the Right says? Just lazily and slothfully call it “racists”
  • ‘Social Justice’ Class for Kids: ‘Make America Great Again’ Is ‘Covert White Supremacy’
Remember summer school? Driver’s education? Perhaps a typewriting class (which I “might” have taken). Easy, “non-serious” stuff. Welp, times have changed. Just ask students at Thomas Pyle Middle School in Maryland, who were enrolled in the school’s five-day “social justice” 2020 summer course, “Reading and Taking Action for Social Justice”. As reported by Just the News, Judicial Watch obtained presentation slides and other materials related to the almost unbelievable course.

In reference to a slide titled “What is systemic racism?”, students were shown a pyramid slide depicting “Differences between overt and covert white supremacy.”

Diff between overt and covert hateful whit supremacy
(Click on website to embiggen)

According to the pyramid, “Make America Great Again” is an example of “covert white supremacy, ranked just below “lynching,” “hate crimes,” “the N-word,” and “racial slurs”. Students were also taught that “white privilege” means being favored by school authorities and having a positive relationship with the police.

(Translation: “Yes, black students, teachers are out to get you — and your fear of the police is justified, so…”). More insanity: examples of other unacceptable covert “white supremacy” include thinking “but we’re just one human family,” “colorblindness,” “cultural appropriation,” “celebration of Columbus Day,” “police murdering POC [people of color],” and “bootstrap theory.”
The First Amendment protects the freedom of speech — but it also protects against compelled speech — yet many universities essentially compel a certain type of speech through diversity trainings. “Just as it is well-settled that the government cannot prohibit individuals from expressing an unpopular view, it’s also well-accepted that the state may not compel individuals to speak or adopt the government’s favorite point of view,” argued Terry Pell, president of the Center for Individual Rights.

And I have been fighting this coerced speech aspect of School Districts embedded in the NH School Board Association’s Policy JBAB (Transgender and None-Conforming Students) and pronouns. This new change of status by Government workers and elected Boards is evil and a throwing away of one of our Republic’s major pillars. It is DANGEROUS that Government is now starting to believe that it and it alone has the Power to determine what an Individual can and cannot say.

And yes, this crapola has turned into a racket:
Positive Coaching Alliance charges up to $10,000 for diversity and inclusion training
Little League baseball coaches in Alexandria, Virginia, will be required to take a diversity, equity, and inclusion course this month.

In an email to coaches on Thursday, Alexandria Little League board president Sherry Reilly announced the league’s partnership with the Positive Coaching Alliance. All Little League coaches and board members were asked to cancel practices in order to attend the Sports Can Battle Racism workshop on May 24.

Virginia school districts have mandated similar training for their teachers. Arlington County schools required teachers to participate in an equity training program in which they were taught how to create an “actively antiracist learning environment.” Loudoun County schools spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on teacher training sessions based on critical race theory—the idea that American institutions are inherently racist.

A Sports Can Battle Racism workshop document for coaches includes six core themes, from “Create a Caring Climate” to “Model Anti-Racist Behavior.” Coaches are encouraged to teach themselves to perceive their own “internalized racism” and look for “potential institutional racism” in the community. Coaches are also asked to “be on the lookout” for moments that they can use as “anti-racism learning opportunities.”

To be continued…
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Bill Maher Mocks Woke Liberals For Their ‘Belief In Whiteness As A Malady’

By Joseph Curl
•Jun 13, 2021 DailyWire.com

LOS ANGELES, CA - JANUARY 18: Bill Maher seen at Jimmy Kimmel Live on January 18, 2017 in Los Angeles, California.
Photo by PG/Bauer-Griffin/GC Images

Bill Maher is a diehard liberal, but sometimes even he can’t stomach the antics of progressives.
The HBO “Real Time” host on Friday mocked young liberals for their “progressophobia,” which he says has resulted in “a growing belief in whiteness as a malady and white people as irredeemable.”

“That’s the phrase coined by Steven Pinker to describe a brain disorder that strikes liberals and makes them incapable of recognizing progress,” Maher said on his show. “It’s like situational blindness, only what you can’t see is that your dorm in 2021 is better than the South before the Civil War. … Acknowledging progress isn’t saying ‘we’re done’ or ‘we don’t need more,’ and being gloomier doesn’t make you a better person.”
Maher mocked the endless — and breathless –reports by the establishment media during the presidency of Donald Trump.

“There is a recurrent theme on the far left that things have never been worse,” he continued. “Kevin Hart expressed a view many hold when he told The New York Times, ‘You’re witnessing white power and white privilege at an all-time high.’ This is one of the big problems with wokeness — that what you say doesn’t have to make sense or jibe with the facts or ever be challenged, lest the challenge itself be conflated with racism. But saying White power and privilege is at an all-time high is just ridiculous.”

Maher pointed out the, uh, past. “Higher than a century ago — the year of the Tulsa race massacre?” he asked. “Higher than the years when the KKK rode unchecked and Jim Crow went unchallenged? Higher than the 1960s when the Supremes and Willie Mays still couldn’t stay in the same hotel as the White people they were working with? Higher than slavery? And I mean actual slavery, not ‘Prince doesn’t like his record contract’ slavery.”

The host pleaded with liberals to search for a cure for “this progressive allergy to acknowledging societal advances.”

“[It’s] self-defeating because progress and hope that we can achieve it is the product we’re selling,” he said. “And having a warped view of reality leads to policies that are warped. Black-only dorms and graduation ceremonies? A growing belief in Whiteness as a malady and White people as irredeemable? Giving up on a colorblind society? Only if you believe we’ve made no product does any of that make sense.”

Of liberals, Maher said: “They have a bad case of progressophobia. That’s a term coined by Steven Pinker to describe a brain disorder that strikes liberals and makes them incapable of recognizing progress. It’s like situational blindness although it means you can’t see that your dorm in 2021 is better than the South before the Civil War.’

Maher later took to Twitter, writing: “If you think America is more racist now than ever, more sexist than before women could vote and more homophobic than when blow jobs were a felony, you have #Progressophobia and you should adjust your mask because its covering your eyes.”

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1403577063269826565
8:54 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

America’s Rotten Academic Establishment Vomits Out More Demented Anti-White Rhetoric

June 12, 2021 (20h ago)
2021.06.12-06.10-revolvernews-60c4f8aecb31f.jpg


Over the past week, the right has given enormous attention to two pieces of exceptionally violent and demented anti-white rhetoric vomited out from America’s rotten academic establishment. For American patriots who have endured a barrage of racialized hatred against them for years on end, these latest incidents may not be worth dwelling on too long.

For years, the right has shied away from admitting exactly what the left has been pushing. Demands for reparations, celebrations of rioting, and hyperbolic screeds from university campuses have been ridiculed, dismissed, or denounced as socialism, Marxism, or neutral concepts like “critical race theory.”

These labels aren’t enough. The nature of America’s new extremism wave requires the right to be honest and frank about what it is. It’s not “socialism,” or “Marxism,” or “liberal fascism.” In 2021, America is facing a steadily-growing amount of anti-white racism. And the surest sign of this ideology’s success is that its chief opponents are terrified to even say what it is. Left unchecked, the rhetoric of anti-white racism is growing from casual abuse to quasi-genocidal.

At Yale University, psychoanalyst Aruna Khilanani delivered a lecture on “The Psychopathic Problem of the White Mind.” The lecture, delivered in early April, was apparently so unremarkable to those watching it that it didn’t attract any notice for two months. The lecture only became known to the wider public when Bari Weiss published a transcript on her Substack. Some of the quotes Weiss highlighted were:
-This is the cost of talking to white people at all. The cost of your own life, as they suck you dry. There are no good apples out there. White people make my blood boil.

-I had fantasies of unloading a revolver into the head of any white person that got in my way, burying their body, and wiping my bloody hands as I walked away relatively guiltless with a bounce in my step. Like I did the world a ****ing favor.

-We keep forgetting that directly talking about race is a waste of our breath. We are asking a demented, violent predator who thinks that they are a saint or a superhero, to accept responsibility. It ain’t gonna happen. They have five holes in their brain. It’s like banging your head against a brick wall. It’s just like sort of not a good idea.

-We need to remember that directly talking about race to white people is useless, because they are at the wrong level of conversation. Addressing racism assumes that white people can see and process what we are talking about. They can’t. That’s why they sound demented. They don’t even know they have a mask on. White people think it’s their actual face. [Bari Weiss]
Meanwhile, in one of the countless execrable journals funded by America’s higher education racket, Donald Moss of the New York Psychoanalytic Institute published a paper, “On Having Whiteness,” that characterizes white people as susceptible to a malignant, incurable brain condition that turns them into psychopathic monsters.
Whiteness is a condition one first acquires and then one has—a malignant, parasitic-like condition to which “white” people have a particular susceptibility. The condition is foundational, generating characteristic ways of being in one’s body, in one’s mind, and in one’s world. Parasitic Whiteness renders its hosts’ appetites voracious, insatiable, and perverse. These deformed appetites particularly target nonwhite peoples. Once established, these appetites are nearly impossible to eliminate. Effective treatment consists of a combination of psychic and social-historical interventions. Such interventions can reasonably aim only to reshape Whiteness’s infiltrated appetites—to reduce their intensity, redistribute their aims, and occasionally turn those aims toward the work of reparation. When remembered and represented, the ravages wreaked by the chronic condition can function either as warning (“never again”) or as temptation (“great again”). Memorialization alone, therefore, is no guarantee against regression. There is not yet a permanent cure. [Sage]
There is no charitable way to spin what Khilanani said or what Moss wrote, though many of course are already trying. This is race hatred. The very fact of being white is equated with parasitism, turning one into a hideous, warped monster. The rhetoric is sexualized — “insatiable” and “voracious” are both directly used to describe sexual appetites, while “perverse” evokes “perverted” — to represent white people as metaphorical and perhaps literal rapists. And of course, this evil is “nearly impossible to eliminate.” And even if controlled or suppressed, whites are ready at a moment’s notice to “regress” back into their evil ways, with no “permanent cure.”

Or, to rephrase Moss’s words slightly, there is not yet a “final solution” to the Whiteness Question.

This is genocidal rhetoric, and it would be obvious to everyone if it were written about any other group. Nobody writes about “Asianness” as a condition. Nobody talks about needing “effective treatment” for “brownness.” The academic who wrote about “parasitic blackness” as a “voracious” and “perverse” force would lose his job instantly.

Let’s not beat around the bush. This is anti-white hatred. It doesn’t matter at all if Moss is white. First, there has always been a suicidal streak to radical leftism, since the days when the Duke of Orleans voted to guillotine Louis XVI only to be executed himself ten months later. Second, the left’s violently anti-white rhetoric doesn’t have to encompass all white people. Rather, it serves the political purpose of automatically treating American whites as class enemies, who are only to be spared ill-treatment or dispossession by special dispensation.

That doesn’t mean mass murder is inevitable or imminent. But this sort of rhetoric is the exact kind of dehumanizing, totalizing rhetoric used to justify the worst atrocities against the largest groups of people.

Labeling white people as “insatiable” parasites, as fonts of “white fragility” or “whitelash” or “white rage” responsible for all of America’s political ills, fuels the cultural moment where it is acceptable to racially discriminate against white people, denying them jobs, university seats, and other opportunities purely on the basis of race. It drives an environment where leaders openly talk about levying special taxes aimed at white people or seizing their assets to redistribute to more favored races.

It’s necessary for the right to label exactly what is going on. Yet right now, those who are most aware of the danger remain hesitant.

James Lindsay is an American mathematician who gained notoriety in 2018 for hoaxing the grievance studies industry with a series of bogus papers bearing titles like “The Conceptual Penis as a Social Construct” and “Our Struggle is My Struggle”, which rewrote portions of Hitler’s Mein Kampf to make it a feminist tract.

Since his hoax, Lindsay has continued to warn about the disastrous and even deadly ramifications of America’s new totalitarian ideology. And after Moss’s sickening paper dropped, Lindsay sounded the alarm:

1623653818285.png

Lindsay clearly states what he means, and his meaning is also intuitive to anybody willing to use common sense. This isn’t about mass murder being imminent, or that if it did happen it would target all white people or only white people. That is a reductionist oversimplification. But what is happening is very clear: anti-white extremists on the left are being casually allowed to propound the most violent, psychopathic rhetoric possible about white people as a collective, and this is dismissed as some meaningless flourish.

Yet disturbingly, Lindsay’s comments were met with immediate and even over-the-top hostility from his own supposed ideological allies.

1623653780189.png
1623653740452.png
1623653695854.png

Even Chris Rufo, who has done heroic work both exposing and banning critical race theory at the state and local level, reacted to Lindsay’s statements with dismay.

1623653652052.png

We respect the work that Rufo has done, but he is dead wrong on this matter. Calling the violent fantasies of extremists merely “symbolic” is playing along with the left’s ratchet strategy, where rhetoric steadily gets more expansive and more explicit in its demands, while reserving the right to say “just kidding!” every time there is pushback. This ratchet is how America went from “police reform” to “abolish the police” and “abolish prisons.” And it’s how America has gone from “symbolic” demands for reparations to American cities literally awarding money to some people based on skin color.

This is a recurring problem for Rufo, as well. Last month, when Marc Lamont Hill asked Rufo to say a single positive thing about being white, he was unable to answer.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1397522506198753280
2:20

Even Rufo, despite all his victories, is letting himself be mentally conquered by the left’s ideology. It’s an ideology that, on a basic level, sees the very word “white” as intrinsically bad, and practically dangerous to utter.

No other group is treated this way. No other group’s defenders are forced to contort themselves like this. Defenders of China’s Uighurs aren’t forced to say that they’re really just defending the right of Uighurs to be treated as individuals. It isn’t “Uighur supremacy” when they demand fair treatment and oppose the destruction of their culture. It isn’t “dangerous” for the concept of “Uighurness” to exist. If a Chinese Ta-Nehisi Coates wrote a bestseller condemning the dysfunction of “people who believe they are Uighurs,” everybody would immediately recognize the sinister undertones, the desire to erase and deny the very existence of a group one hates. Yet the actual Ta-Nehisi Coates writes exactly that about “people who believe they are white,” and the Globalist American Empire treats him as a leading intellectual.

Every day, ordinary American white people are subjected a propaganda blitzkrieg that treats them as the intractable source of all problems in America, incapable of reform or redemption. Even the mildest statement in defense of white people as a group is treated as an unthinkable taboo.

In D.C. the local government rewarded the worst looting in decades by painting “BLACK LIVES MATTER” in mammoth letters down a major street less than one week later. But at Ohio Wesleyan University in 2019, the FBI came in to criminally investigate someone putting up posters that simply said “It’s okay to be white.”

The FBI also joined with state and local police to investigate the same sign at Western Connecticut State University. “It’s okay to be white” hasn’t been linked to a single act of mayhem and destruction yet it is treated as a national crisis, while dozens of major riots in the name of BLM have only entrenched it as state ideology. Why? Because, in America right now, it is emphatically not okay to be white.

“All white people are racist,” “only white people are racist,” and “reverse racism doesn’t exist” may not be believed by everyone, but they are stale tropes resurrected endlessly when needed to justify new discriminatory policies or more anti-white agitation.

In early 2020, Anthony Ferrill murdered five coworkers at the Molson Coors brewery in Milwaukee.

Subsequent coverage subtly suggested the workers may have deserved it due to “racism” at the plant, since an unknown person left a noose in Ferrill’s locker five years before the shooting. What was the fix? As the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel wrote a year later, changes to the company’s policies to disfavor whites.
In the 12 months since the shooting, Molson Coors says it has hired a consulting firm to review its policies, pledged to hire more people of color and given employees more opportunities to share criticism and feedback — work executives say they know must continue.

But efforts to speak to current employees about their experience were unsuccessful.

An expert in workplace discrimination and diversity said lasting change requires a hard look at a company’s values and sustained effort from supervisors up and down the chain of command on every part of an employee’s experience: from hiring and promotions to the way their complaints are handled. [Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel]
America cannot survive if the right continues to live in denial about what is happening. They are not simply locked in a battle with “Marxism” or “critical race theory.” Both could vanish tomorrow, and the real threat would remain. The actors of the Globalist American Empire who call “white supremacy” the nation’s top security threat, or blame “nice white parents” for the problems in education, or melt down over birdwatching being too white, aren’t being motivated by the finer points of Marxism. They’ve simply been trained, at an instinctive level, to despise white people. Less white is good, more white is bad. And once that concept has been made explicit, even the worst atrocities become possible.

The vast majority of Americans do not want to live in a country marred by racial hatred. They believe in fairness, equal opportunity, and treating people as individuals. Even in California, despite a huge spending advantage and the support of almost every nexus of power in the state, a proposition to legalize explicit racial discrimination failed decisively with the state’s voters.

The left’s rhetoric of race hatred is evil, but it’s also unpopular. It survives because its proponents lie about what it is, and their enemies are too frightened to call them out. Contrary to the left’s repeated smears and lies, the right has long avoided racializing America’s policy debates. Even now, half a decade after it became cringeworthy, it’s still more common to see Republicans accuse Democrats of being the real racists against America’s non-whites than it is to see them bluntly state the truth about the left’s anti-white impulses.

The time for this to change is now. From now on, it is the duty of the right’s opinion leaders to openly say what the extremist anti-white left is doing: Deliberately tolerating and enabling violent, dehumanizing, and yes, pre-genocidal rhetoric against innocent American white people. Americans of all races will be ready to resist this. But they need leaders who will honestly say what is happening.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

EXCLUSIVE: Survey Shows More Than Half Of Teachers Who Have Heard Of Critical Race Theory Support It

Findings show the majority of respondents had a neutral or positive view of critical race theory.

Gabe Kaminsky

By Gabe Kaminsky
JUNE 14, 2021

A new survey indicates that although many have not heard of critical race theory, a mere 1 in 10 teachers have a negative view of it, while three times as many teachers hold a positive view of the effort to institutionalize anti-white racism.

The Heritage Foundation’s report, first obtained by The Federalist, displays the survey responses of 1,003 teachers and 1,012 parents on questions of civics education and critical race theory. Braun Research conducted the survey from Dec. 30, 2020, to Feb. 2, 2021.

Findings show a majority of respondents held a neutral, positive, or unsure view of critical race theory. More than half of teachers who have heard of critical race theory approve of it. And despite the flood of media attention to the subject, more than one-third of teachers have not heard of critical race theory, with 40 percent of parents in the same boat. A little more than one-quarter of parents and teachers, respectively, were unsure if they had heard of critical race theory.

0-1.jpg

0-1-1.jpg


“Schools should recommit themselves to teaching history and civics that educates students on the duties of informed citizenship,” said Lindsey Burke, director of the Center for Education Policy at Heritage and one of the report’s co-authors. “They should also be maximally transparent to parents about the content taught between the four walls of the classroom. And most importantly, states should make sure every child can exercise education freedom, choosing a school or learning environment that is the right fit for them.”

Angela Sailor, another report coauthor who is vice president of Heritage’s Edwin J. Feulner Institute, said, “The next generation deserves strong partnerships between parents and teachers. This begins with curriculum transparency and policy solutions that protect the diversity of ideas in the classroom and restore a shared sense of equality under the law. All students no matter their race should be protected from being forced to affirm, adopt, or adhere to CRT through compelled speech and other practices.”

One-fourth of Republican parents said current civics curriculum should stay the same, while more than half of Democrat parents said more civics instruction is needed. Among Republican teachers, a little less than half said civics curriculum should stay the same and more than 70 percent of Democrats said there ought to be more.

It is important to keep in mind that the term “civics” has been convoluted by a surge in schools and theorists framing critical race theory curricula as “action civics” or similar terminology. The findings echo this, showing more than one-third of parents and more than one-fourth of teachers view critical race theory and critical pedagogy as part of an ideal curriculum.

Half of parents and close to 60 percent of teachers indicated critical race theory should be included in civics curriculum. The report notes it wasn’t clear if this response combined with the lack of knowledge about CRT indicates large numbers of people supported CRT in schools out of a desire to be “inclusive” without knowing what they were including.

The report alludes to the redefinition of civics, noting, “Americans’ education of their history and founding is in crisis as radical activists push anti-American philosophies on students under the guise of civics education.”

0-2.jpg


Parents of public school kids were less likely, 34.7 percent, to support critical race theory as the curriculum “focus” than parents of charter (48.7 percent) or private school kids (43.9 percent). Parents who homeschool their kids were found to be the least likely — about a quarter — to want a critical race theory focus.

“Given the overall lack of familiarity with the term, future surveys might do better to ask for reactions to specific tenets of CRT [critical race theory]. That said, the results do suggest that teachers are more positively inclined to CRT than parents,” Stanley Kurtz, a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, told The Federalist. “This is entirely unsurprising. What this survey shows is that we are at the beginning of the battle, and that the outcome is far from evident. Educating parents on the true nature of CRT will be a key determinant of end-result.”

Other authors of the report are Anne Segal, founder of predictive market research group The Frontier Lab, and Adam Kissel, a senior fellow at the Cardinal Institute for West Virginia policy. There is a 95 percent confidence level in the survey findings.

Critical race “teachings are reversing the immense progress this country has made in race relations and equality, as well as stealing major parts of history from students, beginning with small children,” the report states. “Young Americans are taught not to be proud of their country, but to see it as an oppressor. In order to reverse this destructive and dangerous trend, it is essential that schools teach America’s founding principles, while at the same time build strong relationships between parents and teachers."
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Video: Sen. Cotton Reveals Details Of “Anti-American Indoctrination” In U.S. Military

Hundreds of whistleblowers have come forward complaining of ‘woke’ policies including racial segregation of troops for ‘privilege walks’

14 June, 2021
Steve Watson
GettyImages-1232420695.jpg

EVELYN HOCKSTEIN/POOL/AFP via Getty Images

During a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing Friday, Senator Tom Cotton revealed shocking stories from whistleblowers in the military detailing how they are being indoctrinated to hate America by superiors who are adopting ‘woke’ practises, including racial segregation.

Cotton detailed how hundreds of people have come forward to warn that there is a “very specific kind of anti-American indoctrination” going on within the military.
Tom Cotton “I have received, along with Congressman Crenshaw, SEVERAL HUNDRED whistleblower complaints about Pentagon extremist and diversity training,”

“These are not my words,these are the words of your own troops.” pic.twitter.com/lVXQ80K1fJ
— Robert.N (@Rob_Noorollah) June 12, 2021
The Senator told Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin during the hearing that in one instance “Members of the wing were ordered to separate themselves by race and gender in order to stratify people based on their perceived privilege.”

According to the complaint, airmen and women were then sent on “privilege walks.”

“Mr. Secretary, we’re hearing reports of plummeting morale, growing mistrust between the races and sexes, where none existed just six months ago, and unexpected retirements and separations, based on these trainings alone,” Cotton declared.'

Cotton described a separate incident, noting a “Marine told us a military history training session was replaced with mandatory training on police brutality, White privilege, and systemic racism.”

“He reported that several officers are now leaving his unit citing that training,” Cotton stated.

The Senator continued, “Another service member told us that their unit was required to read ‘White Fragility’ by Robin DiAngelo, which claims – and this is a quote- ‘White people raised in Western society are conditioned in a White supremacist world view.’”

Austin responded to Cotton’s statements by suggesting that “diversity, equity and inclusion” are now priorities for The Pentagon, and that it wants a military that “looks like America.”
There is no place for toxic critical race theory in our military.
— Tom Cotton (@TomCottonAR) June 11, 2021
‘Wokeness’ in the military has come under scrutiny recently with weird adverts promoting identity and gender politics, and stories of those who have questioned critical race theory being removed from leadership roles.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Elana Fishbein, founder of the No Left Turn in Education group. (Elana Fishbein)
Elana Fishbein, founder of the No Left Turn in Education group. (Elana Fishbein)
US NEWS

National Parent Group Emerges to Fight ‘Woke’ Education, Says It Harms Children

BY PETR SVAB
June 13, 2021 Updated: June 13, 2021

Less than a year ago, Elana Fishbein was a happy stay-at-home mother, raising her three boys in a well-off Philadelphia suburb. She’d noticed the school that two of her boys attended would push out some lessons and activities that she considered politically biased or inappropriate, but each time was able to resolve the situation by opting her children out. In June last year, however, she saw no other choice than to take action.

Following the protests and riots sparked by the death of George Floyd in Minnesota, the school issued new “cultural proficiency” lessons.

“My husband and I looked at the lesson plan and opened the links to the books that they included for the lesson plan and we were thoroughly horrified because they were totally racist,” she told The Epoch Times.

The events that followed led to the launch of a group that now runs chapters in nearly half the states, sporting tens of thousands of followers.

The school materials Fishbein examined followed what she called “woke” culture—a set of quazi-Marxist ideologies that divides society into “oppressors” and the “oppressed” based on characteristics such as race, sex, class, or sexual proclivities. The term “woke” is sometimes used interchangeably with critical race theory (CRT), which is only one of the ideologies that operate within this framework.

Fishbein immediately opted her children out of the lessons and sent an incensed letter to the school district superintendent.

“The material selected for this indoctrination pumps their brains with LIES that puts unbearable emotional burdens on them for years to come,” she wrote, backing her argument with a doctorate in child welfare (pdf). “Why must our kids feel like villains and hate themselves for something they had no control over—the color/pigmentation of their skin?!?”

“They are doing to us what they told us not to do to others,” her 9-year-old commented, according to the letter.

Her children didn’t return to the school in fall—a decision she’d already made before she learned of the new curriculum.

“I was just a happy mom. But somebody made a point of destroying the life of my children and many other children,” she said.

Since nobody responded to her letter, she posted it on the parents Facebook page of the school, asking others what they thought.

The response took her aback.

“I was called racist and bigoted and homophobe and whatever,” she said.

Her post was then taken down.

She tried several other local Facebook pages with similar results.

“I was blown away,” she said. “They won’t even discuss it. They just call you a name.”

She contacted her friend at a conservative-leaning news outlet that agreed to run a story about her experience.

It was then that people facing similar issues started to reach out to her.

“They were telling me, every single one of them, that they’re afraid to speak up,” she said.

This was the watershed moment for her.

Being of Jewish descent, Fishbein felt an implicit threat behind the ideology.

“This is ridiculous,” she said she told herself. “This is going to take over our country. They’re attacking our children. They’re attacking our families, our values, our way of life and we’re just going to sit around and take the bullet? And people are just afraid? Just because somebody called you a racist?”

In that moment, in late-August, “it hit me … and I launched a movement,” she said.

She assembled in her living room a few parents that contacted her and she shared her idea with them.
“Are you a racist? If you’re a racist, I understand, but if you’re not a racist, why are you not standing up for your kid and for your family?” she told them.

In mid-September, she was invited on Fox News’ “Tucker Carlson Tonight” after somebody forwarded the initial article about Fishbein to the show.

Over the week after the show aired, her small Facebook page called “No Left Turn in Education” received over a million visits.

Tens of thousands of people were reaching out to her with their fears and worries.

“They were tormented. And many of them said, ‘We would like to act, but we don’t know what to do,’” she said.

And so she started to organize people into chapters.

Soon after, the organization launched its first lawsuit after Fishbein connected a Nevada mother with a lawyer.

The Clark Suit
The mother, Gabrielle Clark, had a son in his senior year at Democracy Prep at the Agassi Campus charter school in Las Vegas. In late August, the school launched a series of lessons that asked students to “label and identify” which groups they belonged to based on race, sex, religion, and family income. The teacher leading the lessons then attached the labels of “privileged” and “oppressive” versus “oppressed” to the groups, according to court documents (pdf).

Privilege was defined as “the inherent belief in the inferiority of the oppressed group,” while “oppression” was defined as “malicious or unjust treatment or exercise of power.”

While Clark is a black single mother of five, her son William inherited blond hair, green eyes, and light skin from his deceased father. As it turned out, the young man hit nearly all the “privileged” and “oppressive” checkboxes, being raised in Judeo-Christian values and the only one perceived as white in his class.

The teacher also instructed the students that they have to “unlearn” and “fight back” against “oppressive” structures supposedly implicit in their family arrangements, religious beliefs, race, and sex, the court documents say.

Clark refused to accept this.

“All I could think of was, ‘How in the world is my son supposed to function in his life normally with his siblings and with his mother with this idea in the back of his head that he is somehow privileged and oppressing us?’ I couldn’t allow that to be the way my son felt about himself,” she said during a March interview with YouTube channel “The Reason We Learn.”

Her son refused to follow the classes and complete the related assignments and was thus failed, which would lead to a failure to graduate. The family pleaded with the school to allow him to take an alternative class, but the school refused.

In December, the family filed a suit, alleging the constitutional rights of both William and his mother were violated and that a government-funded school has no business attaching moral judgements to students based on their identities and compel them to participate in the exercise, much less to “unlearn” some of the traditional values they’ve learned at home.

The school hired a powerful law firm and responded by saying Clark’s son wasn’t really facing any adverse action and was just trying to avoid lessons he didn’t like.

But two expert witnesses presented by Clark concluded that the class materials were indeed discriminatory.

“The class materials appear to teach critical race theory as both morally superior and factual, rather than as a theory,” concluded Ilana Redstone, associate professor of sociology at the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, in her expert opinion (pdf).

Such school materials that place students in a hierarchy based on immutable identities are “unacceptable and discriminatory,” said Redstone, a specialist in “political polarization, viewpoint diversity, and communication across ideological divides.”

“This material inherently pits students against one another based on their race and sex (among other identities),” wrote the other witness, Erec Smith, associate professor of Rhetoric and Composition at York College of Pennsylvania (pdf).

The school didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Clark is now the chapter head of No Left Turn in Nevada.

Parents Organize
The group helps parents oppose the woke education based on a strategy of four “E”s, Fishbain said. “We’re educating them, then we’re empowering them, then we’re engaging them, and finally, we are going to eradicate this whole thing.”

The group is providing legal help, offering model curricula, and even model legislation to ban CRT from schools, as some states have already done.

It’s also helping parents to file Freedom of Information requests to obtain school materials, especially where schools refuse to disclose what’s happening in their classrooms, Fishbain said.

“A lot of our work is actually exposing what’s going on.”

The next step is to explain to parents what they could do about any woke influence they find in their children’s schools.

“We educate them about the importance of the school board, the role of the school board, and who’s making the decision about the curriculum, who’s making the decision on what books are going to be at your kid’s class, what curriculum, what lesson plan, who’s hiring all those trainers [that proliferate woke ideologies], how much money they are paying for them to come and brainwash your kids and poison their minds and their heart,” Fishbain said.

She’s compiled a list of nearly 100 “euphemisms” used by these woke proponents aimed at helping people to decode the meaning of the jargon-laden materials used by schools.

The group is planning to launch a new website in a few weeks that will make available all the various materials and advice as well as testimonials from parents, students, and teachers.

One of the most crucial points is to help people get together and organize themselves, she said.

“Facing this whole machine alone is really almost impossible.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

A Shift On The Right
Posted by HENRY DELACROIX on JUNE 14, 2021

The post-Trump right is disorganized right now but a Trumpian policy set seems to be forming. The economic nationalism and populism he pitched seems here to stay. A deeper shift is occurring that has gone unnoticed. The pundit class has begun to call things anti-white.

This is a noticeable shift that has occurred with no real change from the left. The right calls the rhetoric and messaging from the left anti-white. Even the softest of pundits, Rod Dreher, has joined the chorus. These same media figures avoided this in 2020 during the BLM rioting, which was chock full of anti-white signs and chants. That was called anti-American.

Anyone prior to this trying to point out the melange of government enforced policies, judicial decisions and bureaucratic regulations that actively suppressed whites was a conspiracy theorist. It was beyond the pale to make an argument that the American system actively constructed rules that were anti-white. The meritocracy myth worked really well, despite easily measured disparities of the quality of different ethnic or racial groups selected for universities, med school programs, et cetera.

What changed? The change may be that Critical Race Theory became an explicit expression of the Civil Rights infrastructure laced with language scapegoating whites, and the desire to implement it in schools for children. This was all woven into our universities though. Why didn’t they care? The right has or had a false impression that the university system was a self-contained ecosystem with little effect on broader culture. Universities are insane was what they could say as cope.

Critical Race Theory is an easy target because it is so explicit in its anti-white messaging. It is another step in the scapegoating that leads to ethnic conflict or targeting by authorities. Finally, the loose conspiracy theory that could string together a lot of policies that were implicit has a tangible, explicit target. It’s simple and can be a catch all for the left’s broader mood. The left knows this so is falling back on obfuscation, denial and calling the right hysterical.

The left also made an error of going explicit. The American victim culture makes our political battles ridiculous by the framing always being more difficult for the supposed aggressors. America’s old culture war was the left aggressively trying to upend American traditions and norms. This changed in the ‘90s with the right being seen as aggressors trying to change the status quo. This can be tied back to Pat Buchanan’s famous 1992 RNC speech.

Buchanan was merely saying that all the weird things the left pushed had to be fought. We had to defend our norms and fight back. What this speech did was allow the media to frame the right as the aggressors and disruptive force in the culture war. It is a frame that sticks even today. The left continually ends the status quo to create a new protected class for the central power to use, but the right is the force seen as the aggressor.

This move to explicitly calling calls for equity and policy change as salves to racial grievance exposes mainstream America to the insanity on campuses. It now creates a reaction. This is why the left is trying to obfuscate what CRT is, just as the New York Times attacked Trump’s anti-CRT executive order as banning sensitivity training and never quoting the training materials. The left knows it is caught and its word can be used against them. They still hold all the cards, but states can make moves to fight this.

A danger to the left is red state governments go after grievance study funding at universities and curriculum there at the root of the problem. The real danger for the status quo is that identity politics becomes a white thing and that more whites see that the left is full on eliminationist now. As an object of discussion, CRT allows all those insane peer review published papers to see sunlight. The academics that write those papers staff NGOs and bureaucracies. There can be no happy compromise. Going after this insanity can make a backbencher leap to prominence at the state level. There is now a name for the poison that regular people have felt but never quite understood for years. There is no going back.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
war room.JPG
Hero Pastor Artur Pawlowski Joins War Room In Studio 5:03 min

Hero Pastor Artur Pawlowski Joins War Room In Studio
Bannons War Room Published June 14, 2021

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
'If You're Not Scared Yet, You're Not Paying Attention': Artur Pawlowski Warns of Communist Takeover 7:02 min

'If You're Not Scared Yet, You're Not Paying Attention': Artur Pawlowski Warns of Communist Takeover
Bannons War Room Published June 14, 2021

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^6
Artur Pawlowski: Now is the Time to Fight 12:31 min

Artur Pawlowski: Now is the Time to Fight
Bannons War Room Published June 14, 2021

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Artur Pawlowski: The Mask is a Symbol to 'Be a Good Slave' 3:18 min

Artur Pawlowski: The Mask is a Symbol to 'Be a Good Slave'
Bannons War Room Published June 14, 2021
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Fairfax Board Member Rails Against The Dangers Of "Excessive Individualism"

MONDAY, JUN 14, 2021 - 05:00 PM
Authored by Jonathan Turley,

There has been a great deal of controversy over the graduation address of Fairfax County school board member Abrar Omeish to the Justice High School in Falls Church on June 7th.

In her remarks to the graduates, Omeish praised a teacher who made social activism part of her class and warned the graduates that they are going into a world filled with racism and white supremacy.

However, what really struck an admittedly libertarian chord with me was the third danger that she warned about: “excessive individualism.”



Like free speech, individualism is now being presented as a danger rather than a strength in our society.

Omeish is a strong speaker who impressively moved between English, Spanish, and Arabic in her address. However, many parents objected in Fairfax (where I live) to the content of the remarks. She labeled those who do not agree with the activism agenda as effectively opposing anti-racism values:
“You understand that social justice is only political for those that can afford to ignore it. You understand that ‘neutral’ is another word for complicit. And you have made a choice to take a stand.”
She encouraged the students to remain activists and pursue “jihad” because “we struggle with human greed, racism, extreme versions of individualism and capitalism, white supremacy, growing wealth gaps, disease, climate crisis, extreme poverty amidst luxury and waste right next door. And the list goes on.”

As we have previously discussed, “jihad” in Arabic does not mean violent acts despite the common view of the term. It is a reference to good acts or public service.
There is no basis to suggest that this speech was encouraging violent action. Rather, she declared “Every part of your being may scream in rage at the ways others have wronged you,” but “let compassion for your fellow human beings, not anger or rage — and believe me this is hard to do — fuel you.”

What stood out for me was the reference to “extreme versions of individualism.” There was a time when individualism was viewed as a core protection and value in our society. Now it is often denounced as a harmful value that resists more collective and communal priorities from fighting Covid-19 to racial justice.

For years, academics have lashed out at individualism as a barrier for public policy goals like health care. On study on the “excesses of individualism” concluded, for example, “Libertarian individualism has created political isolation and prevents the evolution of democratic decision making and real partnerships in healthcare.” The case against individualism has been made in books ranging from Robert N. Bellah’s book Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life, Amitai Etzioni’s The Spirit of Community. Writers like Nick Romeo insist:
Radical individualism today retains this highly circumscribed conception of government’s role; the body politic – above all – serves to protect the safety and the property of the individual. This is exemplified in a line made popular by the US president Ronald Reagan: the nine most terrifying words in the English language are: ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’ It is a radical philosophy that suggests the political collective should have no role beyond the protection of the individual.
The old view of “rugged individualism” has become reactionary individualism for those arguing for a new collective consciousness.

The move against individualism brings to mind a quote from Pasternak’s Doctor Zhivago:
“The main misfortune, the root of all the evil to come, was the loss of confidence in the value of one’s own opinion. People imagined that it was out of date to follow their own moral sense, that they must all sing in chorus, and live by other people’s notions, notions that were being crammed down everybody’s throat.”
Few would argue that there is no value in collective action and policies. Individualism is not anarchy. The concern is that the attacks on individualism are coinciding with attacks on values like free speech. There is a movement to force adherence to accepted norms or values — and a corresponding intolerance for opposing views.

That is why the dire warning of Omeish for the young graduates to fear “excessive individualism” was so jarring for those of us who find believe that on certain rights, to paraphrase Oscar Wilde, nothing succeeds like excess.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Saturday, June 12, 2021
Cis Rights. We, Too, Are Born This Way

A decade ago, Lady Gaga released "Born This Way," a song she wrote and recorded at the Abbey Road studio in London. It endeared her with the LGBTQ+ crowd, which is an important and even trend-setting demographic in pop music.

The song's message is simply this is who I am, accept me.

Well, OK.

And that was a good message for the time. California voters had voted down gay marriage 3 years earlier, even as they overwhelmingly voted for Obama.

But in the decade since, the goalposts have changed (as they always do with socialists). We have gone from tolerance to acceptance to dominance. Everyone has rights except the 95% who are straight and comfortable with their biological sex.

The left sneers and calls us cis.

Fine.

Cis rights.

Lefties can have the rainbow flag. We'll take the American flag. Too bad if that triggers the left.

We take the American flag because for 245 years, it has stood for liberty, the very liberties that the LGBTQ+ crowd wants for itself but is unwilling to extend to others.

I get that long ago homosexuality was banned and people were imprisoned. Sodomy laws were in abundance. They had been there for hundreds of years. The law also banned adultery.

But as a baby boomer, our attitudes were different. I was 15 when the Stonewall Riots occurred in NYC. The next year, the Kinks released a very funny song about cross-dressing, called "Lola." Two years later, Lou Reed released his Transformer album. Its most famous track was "Walk on the Wild Side," which featured a transgendered girl named Holly. She came from Miama, F-L-A. Shaved her legs and then he was a she.
That song now offends transgenders.

The Village People came after that. Queen too. Rock Hudson came out of the closet, which did not surprise me. Jim Nabors did too, which did surprise me. I guess the rumor that the two had married in Hawaii was not as wild a tale as I thought. For the record, they did not marry.

My point is that LGBTQ+ was more acceptable to the baby boomer generation, or at least the sliver I was in.
What is not acceptable is treating straights as second-class citizens. The American Way is to accept all people, not just certain groups that claim victimhood. And if Lady Gaga meant "Born This Way" applies only to certain groups, well, too damned bad.

I'm cis.

I was born this way, too.

Rights, of course, come in conflict. Some transgendered women are trying to shove cis women to the back of the feminist movement, calling them TERFs. And of course, the Biden administration no longer calls women mothers. They have been demoted to birthing people, an irony because after a half century of feminism, lefties now want to reduce women to their ovaries and uteruses.

People now are rising for cis rights, although they do not call it that. They call it normal.

The Daily Mail reported, "An eighth grader in Virginia has slammed Loudoun County Public Schools for a policy she claims lets boys use girls locker rooms, putting female students in danger.

"Jolene Grover, 14, spoke at the school district's board meeting on Tuesday to address its proposed policy 8040. She was pulled from a LCPS school last year by her mother, Fox News reported.

"'Two years ago, I was told policy 1040 was just an umbrella philosophy and you weren't going to allow boys into the girls' locker rooms. But here you are doing just that,' Grover said while wearing a shirt that read 'Woman is female.'"

Policy 8040 would replace 1040. The key part of 1040 is, "The Loudoun County School Board is committed to providing for an equitable, safe and inclusive learning and working environment.

The Loudoun County School Board affirms a commitment to this principle for all persons regardless of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, disability, age, or genetic information."

The proposed 8040 would give special rights to transgendered kids.

The key part is, "All students are entitled to have access to restrooms and locker rooms that are sanitary, safe, and adequate, so that they can comfortably and fully engage in their school programs and activities.

Students should be allowed to use the facility that corresponds to their gender identity. While some transgender students will want that access, others may want alternatives that afford more privacy. Taking into account existing school facilities, administrators should take steps to designate gender-inclusive or single-user restrooms commensurate with the size of the school."

And that is where lefties crossed the line, and deliberately so.

Girls will have to share locker rooms with boys who claim to be girls. Policy 8040, as proposed, says, "LCPS staff shall allow gender-expansive or transgender students to use their chosen name and gender pronouns that reflect their gender identity without any substantiating evidence..."
Enough.

Jolene Grover, 14, was brave and stood up to this, calling out the absurdity.

She is the child in "The Emperor's New Clothes" who breaks the silence and says the emperor is naked.
Grownups also are standing up.

The Daily Mail story noted, "The teen's comments come after Byron Tanner Cross, a gym teacher at Leesburg Elementary in the same school district, was suspended last month after giving a speech opposing the policy.

"Cross, who claimed the policies went against his religion, has since been ordered to be reinstated by a judge, who pointed to free speech and religious liberty in his decision.\

"He was arguing over two policies put in place by the public school board: one mandating teachers use the pronouns a transgender child identifies with, and one allowing transgender kids to take part in sports with the gender they identify with."

LGBTQ+ has rights, but so does cis. And we need not apologize to anyone for being who we are because we were Born This Way.

Posted by Don Surber at 6/12/2021 11:00:00 AM
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Biden Administration Asks Americans to Report ‘Potentially’ Radicalized Friends and Family
US President Joe Biden attends a EU - US summit at the European Union headquarters in Brussels on June 15, 2021. (Photo by KENZO TRIBOUILLARD / AFP) (Photo by KENZO TRIBOUILLARD/AFP via Getty Images)
KENZO TRIBOUILLARD/AFP via Getty Images

CHARLIE SPIERING15 Jun 20212,659

President Joe Biden’s administration announced their plans to create ways for Americans to report radicalized friends and family to the government, in an effort to fight domestic terrorism.

In a conversation with reporters, one senior administration official explained the importance of stopping politically fueled violence before it started.

“We will work to improve public awareness of federal resources to address concerning or threatening behavior before violence occurs,” the official said.

The official cited the Department of Homeland Security’s “If you see something say something” campaign to help stop radical Islamic terror as a domestic possibility.

“This involves creating contexts in which those who are family members or friends or co-workers know that there are pathways and avenues to raise concerns and seek help for those who they have perceived to be radicalizing and potentially radicalizing towards violence,” the official said.

Biden began his presidency with a stark warning in his inauguration speech about the “rise in political extremism, white supremacy, domestic terrorism that we must confront and we will defeat.” On June 1, Biden described the threat from “white supremacy” as the “most lethal threat to the homeland today.”

The Biden administration said it would also work with large technology companies on “increased information sharing” to help combat radicalization.

“Any particular tech company often knows its own platform very well,” the official noted. “But the government sees things — actually, threats of violence — across platforms. They see the relationship between online recruitment, radicalization, and violence in the physical world.”

The Department of Homeland Security also plans to deploy “digital literacy” and “digital fitness” programs to help combat “malicious content online that bad actors deliberately try to disseminate.”

The official reassured reporters that the administration’s new strategies would remain “laser-focused” on stopping violent acts.

“This is a strategy that is agnostic as to political ideology or off the spectrum,” the official said. “What matters is when individuals take their political or other grievances and turn that — unacceptably, unlawfully — into violent action.”

The official added the Biden administration was taking the threat of domestic terrorism seriously and would redirect the focus of intelligence agencies on internal threats.

“We are investing many agencies of the government and resourcing them appropriately and asking our citizens to participate,” the official said. “Because, ultimately, this is really about homeland security being a responsibility of each citizen of our country to help us achieve.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Navy Chief Dodges Questions on Ibram Kendi’s Extremism After Recommending His Book to Sailors
U.S. House Armed Services Committee / YouTube

Video on website 5:17 min

KRISTINA WONG15 Jun 2021153

Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Michael Gilday on Tuesday defended putting Ibram X. Kendi’s book How to Be an Anti-Racist on the Navy’s list of books every United States sailor should read, under grilling from Republican Study Committee Chairman Jim Banks (R-IN) at a House hearing.

Banks, a U.S. Navy reservist, began by asking Gilday if he agreed with Kendi’s past statements and views in his book that Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett is a “white colonizer” because she adopted two children from Haiti, and that capitalism is essentially racist.

Gilday responded, “Here’s what I know, Congressman. There’s racism in the United States Navy.”
Banks cut off Gilday, “It’s a yes or no question, Admiral. Admiral, you recommended that every sailor in the United States Navy read this book.”

Gilday responded, “I’m not forcing anybody to read the book. It’s on a recommended reading list.”
Banks then asked Gilday if he read the book, to which Gilday confirmed, “I did.”

Banks asked Gilday if he agreed with Kendi’s statements that white people are a different breed of humans and are responsible for the AIDS virus.

Gilday responded: “Sir, I’d have to understand the context in which the statements were made. I’m not going to sit here and defend cherry-picked quotes from somebody’s book. This is a bigger issue than somebody’s book. What this is really about is trying to paint the United States military, and in this case, the United States Navy is weak, as woke. … We are not weak.”

Banks responded, “Admiral, I remain astonished that you put this book on a reading list and recommended that every sailor in the United States read it. I’m also surprised that you said you read it.”

Banks noted that the Pentagon ordered a stand-down in the ranks to discuss extremism because it detracts from military readiness, and asked Gilday if he thought that sailors accepting Kendi’s views that the military and the Navy is fundamentally racist would decrease morale, cohesion, and recruiting.

Gilday responded:
I do know this. Our strength is in our diversity, and our sailors understand that. Racism in the United States is a very complex issue. What we benefit from is an open discussion about those issues. That we don’t try to ignore it or rewrite it, but we actually have a discussion about it and there will be different views. And I trust sailors will come to an understanding of hopefully separating fact from fiction agreeing or disagreeing with Kendi in this case, and come to hopefully very useful conclusions about how we treat each other in the United States military.
Banks then questioned Gilday on what part of the book was redeeming and qualifies that every sailor should read. Gilday then began to defend Kendi, saying, “his own journey as an African American in this country, what he’s experienced…”

Banks again questioned him on if he thought sailors reading a book that said the U.S. military and Navy is racist would affect morale, cohesion, and recruiting.

Gilday, responded, “I think we’ll be a better Navy for having open, honest conversations about racism.”
One GOP source in the room said Gilday was “shaking like a leaf.”

Banks first queried Gilday about the book in February in a letter he sent but did not receive a satisfactory response.

“In my view, Kendi has espoused extremist beliefs that clearly violate the oath of the Constitution that I took when I served in the Navy,” Banks said at the beginning of his questioning.

The U.S. military, under the Biden administration, has dramatically stepped up efforts to address racism and “extremism” in the military, citing the January 6 Capitol riot. To date, there has been only one active-duty service member charged in connection to the riot, out of more than 450 charged.
 
Top