POL November 3: The 2020 U.S. ELECTION DAY MAIN THREAD

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Liberal activists looking to pressure Augusta members over Georgia voting law hit wall of secrecy

by Zachary Halaschak, Economics Reporter |
| April 08, 2021 05:12 PM

Critics of Georgia’s new election law are seizing on golf’s Masters Tournament to put heat on executives who belong to the storied home course, but pressuring companies to speak out by targeting their bosses is not easy because membership at Augusta National is a closely held secret.

Calls for a boycott of the tournament, now underway, percolated after Major League Baseball pulled its annual All-Star game out of Atlanta in protest of new voting rules signed into law by Gov. Brian Kemp. But the effort soon fizzled, and one reason may be the club's fierce privacy.

Nestled amid the pastoral pines and azaleas of Georgia, the Augusta National Golf Club, referred to simply as the National by members, works hard to ensure its 300 (or so) members receive the treatment and exclusivity that their power affords. The club, which is perhaps best known for hosting the annual Masters, is shrouded in lore and secrecy. Whether the executives of such Georgia-based companies as United Airlines, Coca-Cola, and others who have taken a stance on the Peach State's new laws are members is unclear.

The Augusta National, founded by legendary amateur golfer Bobby Jones and investment banker Clifford Roberts, first opened in 1932. Roberts served as the chairman of the Masters from 1934 to 1976, during which time the allure of the winter retreat for the wealthy and powerful grew, as did his friendship with former President Dwight Eisenhower, who helped build prestige for the club and used it as a personal escape during his presidency.

One cannot simply become a member of the club by having money or power or by knowing those with money or power. Membership is strictly by invitation only. And if a person makes it known of his or her desire to become part of the fabled club, or actively seeks membership, the person will likely not receive an invitation.

Membership to the most exclusive golf club in the world is not as expensive as other elite venues. While exact dollar amounts are strictly bound by secrecy, one member told Golf Digest under the condition of anonymity that a decade ago, it was in the “low five figures,” and annual dues are reportedly just “a few thousand dollars.” By contrast, the Liberty National Golf Club charged nearly $500,000 in initiation fees in 2009 (Liberty National would not reveal its current fee when contacted by the Washington Examiner).

Membership at Augusta National has also been fraught with controversy. Lee Elder, who was honored during the Masters opening ceremony on Thursday, was the first black golfer to compete in the tourney back in 1975. Until 1982, when competitors were first allowed to bring their own caddies, all of the caddies were black. The club didn’t open its doors to any black members until 1990, and it only handed out its first invitations to female members in 2012.

1954 Masters
In this April 12, 1954, file photo, Sam Snead, White Sulphur Springs, W. Va., tees off in an 18-hole Masters playoff at Augusta National Golf Club in Augusta, Ga. Snead and Ben Hogan, standing behind, second from left, tied the day before in the championship. In what was voted the sixth-best Masters, Snead won his third green jacket. (AP)

But what does membership provide?

Members of the Augusta National have access to its legendary golf course and facilities from mid-October until late May. The course itself does not have a difficulty rating, further adding to its mystique, although estimates have been made. Keeping with its idyllic vibe, every hole is named after flowers located on the property: Magnolia, Juniper, Camellia, etc.

Much goes on behind the scenes to maintain the club’s almost unbelievably bucolic exterior. It has been reported that Augusta National paints patches of grass that appear off in order to maintain verdant uniformity, the ponds used to be dyed blue, and there have been rumors that artificial bird noises are piped into the course through speakers hidden in the foliage. The club’s pine straw is also imported and spread across the grounds, and the sand inside the bunkers is not actually sand, but rather quartz shipped in from a mine in North Carolina.

Quartz Bunker

Harris English, who played at the University of Georgia, fires at the flag with his sand shot to the 13th green during his practice round for the Masters at Augusta National Golf Club on Tuesday, April 6, 2021, in Augusta, Ga.
(Curtis Compton/AP)

Security at the property is tight, and those working at the guardhouse reportedly know each member by sight. Members, who are given their signature green jackets after joining, are allowed to bring guests, known as patrons, with them to golf. The patrons are also permitted to play without a member present, although that member must be somewhere on the property at the time. Rounds of golf are escapist in nature, with cellphones and electronic devices absolutely prohibited at the club under penalty of removal.

Membership also affords access to the clubhouse — which is elegant and refined, but also understated and cozy. The three-story building is a Southern manor first built as the home for a plantation owner back in 1854. Nowhere in sight are gilded chalices or marble columns, although the facility is filled with treasures.

The clubhouse brings together some of the world’s most powerful people to drink and dine with one another. Rigid fraternity-like rules, many unspoken, permeate the walls of the building despite its casual, clubby persona.

“Dad was not a humble man, but he was always nervous at Augusta. He didn’t want to break a rule. The club turned these high-powered men into boys,” one person whose father was a member told the New Yorker.

The Trophy Room, which features portraits of Eisenhower, Jones, and Roberts, is perhaps the most exclusive place to dine on the property. There is a legend that the eyes on the paintings follow people no matter where they stand inside the room, according to the Augusta Chronicle. The Trophy Room includes the permanent Masters trophy, among other pieces of art and memorabilia from the history of golf.

The club’s library is similarly busting with history and houses a desk that Eisenhower once used. The locker room is a members-only space where they can huddle for private conversation and also eat breakfast or lunch.

Clubhouse
Collin Morikawa on the putting green outside the Augusta National Golf Course club house during a practice round for the Masters golf tournament Monday, Nov. 9, 2020, in Augusta, Ga.
(Charlie Riedel/AP)

Another unique feature of the clubhouse is the Crow’s Nest. Perched atop the Champions Locker Room, the Crow’s Nest is a living quarters that can fit up to five people. The room, which is certainly not opulent and is divided by cubicles, traditionally houses the amateur competitors who make the Masters cut. Golf legends, including Tiger Woods and Jack Nicklaus, have all stayed inside the Crow’s Nest while competing as amateurs.

Along with the clubhouse, members gain access to 10 exclusive cabins nestled about the property. Members, their families, and patrons can stay in the units while visiting the course. Like most things at the course, the upfront costs are low, with a reported nightly price tag of just over $100. The cabins are also named after important figures to the club, including one designed specifically to house Eisenhower.

Each year, the Masters thrusts Augusta National into the spotlight. Hundreds of patrons descend upon the area to watch the tournament, but some receive even more exclusivity than others at a little-known refuge called Berckman’s Place. The hospitality area, which is reportedly 90,000 square feet and cost $30 million to build, is only open for one week each year.

Entrance into Berckman’s is rumored to cost $6,000 or more for the week (or for the day depending on the source), but once inside, there are no prices on the menus at any of its four restaurants. The facility, the walls of which are lined with historic memorabilia, also holds perfect replicas of Augusta National’s No. 7, No. 14, and No. 16 putting greens, where those invited into the club within a club can practice their shot with the best putters money can buy.

This year’s Masters will be the first held with spectators since 2019. Last year’s tournament was postponed from April to November because of the COVID-19 pandemic and was held without fans. While the identities of most of the roughly 300 Augusta National members remain a guarded secret, if they attend the tournament, they are required to don their distinctive green jackets — the only time the outside world may catch a glimpse of the who’s who in this elite group.

Augusta National
This April 5, 2006 file photo shows bright yellow flowers in the shape of the United States adorn the lawn at the clubhouse during practice for the 2006 Masters golf tournament at the Augusta National Golf Club in Augusta, Ga.
(David J. Phillip/AP)

The club and tournament faced scrutiny in the lead-up to this year’s competition from liberal activists who were pushing members to denounce the tournament over Georgia’s voting law. Republicans such as Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida also pressured executives, including Major League Baseball CEO Rob Manfred, to drop their membership after the MLB moved its All-Star Game and draft out of the state in protest.

Other known members include Berkshire Hathaway founder Warren Buffett, Microsoft founder Bill Gates, and Atlanta Braves Chairman Terry McGuirk. The Washington Examiner attempted to find out if they will be attending this year’s Masters but didn’t receive responses.

Coca-Cola, which is now the target of a boycott led by former President Donald Trump over its statements about the voting law, is based in Atlanta and has had executives on Augusta National’s roster in the past. When contacted by the Washington Examiner to inquire about if its executives have ties to the Masters, a spokesperson for Coca-Cola emphasized that the company does not sponsor the tournament and said that it generally does not reveal information about its executives.

The Washington Examiner has reached out to other companies, such as Delta Air Lines, AT&T, and IBM, to see if their executives are members and, if so, would be attending this year’s Masters.

Augusta National itself has kept about its private nature and refused to take a public stand on the law other than to say its members support voting rights. It has opted instead to focus on this week’s tournament and not bow to outside forces, a tack very similar to the traditional, insular nature surrounding just about everything about the elite club.

“We realize that views and opinions on this law differ, and there have been calls for boycotts and other punitive measures. Unfortunately, those actions often impose the greatest burdens on the most vulnerable in our society,” said Augusta National Chairman Fred Ridley.

Ridley added that while he knows some people want Augusta to take a stand, he doesn’t think it would “be helpful to ultimately reaching a resolution.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

MITCH MCCONNELL BACKS DOWN AGAIN, REPORTEDLY EASES UP ON STANCE THAT BUSINESSES SHOULDN’T BE POLITICAL AMID MLB/COCA-COLA SCANDAL, OTHERS STAND FIRM

BY: IAN MACDONALD
ON: APRIL 8, 2021

After previously flip-flopping on his stance about former President Donald Trump, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell is doing more of the same. McConnell, who was a fervent supporter of Trump’s during most of his presidency, is also the opposite type of Republican.

Whereas Donald Trump is and always has been a ‘tell it like it is’ fighter, McConnell has always played the game of politics as though it is only a matter of ‘give and take’, and often appears to give more than he takes. Although some old-guard Republicans may describe Mitch as the smart counterpart to Nancy Pelosi, the U.S. Speaker of the House, many others would go as far as to say he has betrayed the GOP in many ways with weakness.

The Hill is out with a report that Mitch is already backtracking after attempting to appear strong in the face of ‘woke’ corporations in the U.S., who almost always side with the left. It’s almost as if corporations are just an extension of the leftist ran Hollywood-media-government complex, as we see it anyway.

Apparently Mitch McConnell, who is himself a huge recipient of major corporate donor cash, said that corporations shouldn’t be too political, but should definitely keep divvying out cash of course. Now he is apparently reversing course on that already pathetic and weak stance in the eyes of many Republican voters.

While many airlines and the MLB are trying to leverage their financial strength on behalf of the Democrats to force states not to enact voter integrity bills, and Coca-Cola training courses have reportedly taught employees how to “be less White”, it’s hard to see how McConnell is doing anything at all in the way of what people voted for him to do.

1617917713044.png
The Hill reported of McConnell in part:

“I didn’t say that very artfully yesterday. They’re certainly entitled to be involved in politics. They are. My principal complaint is they didn’t read the darn bill,” McConnell said Wednesday at a press conference in Paducah, Kentucky.
The GOP leader softened his tough talk from earlier in the week, when he warned that companies would face “serious consequences” if they become “a vehicle for far-left mobs to hijack our country.”

He warned that “businesses must not use economic blackmail to spread disinformation and push bad ideas that citizens reject at the ballot box.”

“I found it completely discouraging to find a bunch of corporate CEOs getting in the middle of politics,” McConnell said Monday at a press conference in his home state. “My advice to the corporate CEOs of America is to stay out of politics. Don’t pick sides in these big fights.”


It’s hard to say if Republicans ever do take back the U.S. Senate if they will be goofy enough to put Mitch back in the Majority position. If they do they would be signing on to just more losing in our view. Meanwhile, many Republicans in red and swing state legislatures are doing the opposite, cracking down on weak voter ID laws and other things of that nature, and trying to push for bills to keep only biological women in sports, among other things.

Some states are even pushing to ban any sort of “vaccine passports” from ever being enacted on any Government level. While the era of the McConnells of the GOP may have long since passed, the effects of voting for him and people like him clearly will linger in the GOP for some time to come as GOP voters and strategists decide if they want to ever start winning, or not.

At least, for Trump-like voters anyway, Republicans like U.S. House Rep Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) have continued to stay strong in their anti ‘woke’ corporation stances.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Big Moves From Mike Pence. What's His Endgame?
BY TYLER O'NEIL APR 07, 2021 11:12 PM ET
2755c230-c464-4217-b7b4-e92a892a3b21-730x487.jpg
AP Photo/Julio Cortez
Former Vice President Mike Pence may be laying the groundwork for a 2024 presidential run, or he may be working to bring the Republican Party together to a new post-Donald Trump synthesis, or he may be solidifying his legacy. Whatever his ultimate goal, Pence is making some big moves.

On Wednesday, Mike Pence launched the Advancing American Freedom (AAF) advocacy group, designed to merge traditional conservatism with Trumpism, The Washington Examiner reported. AAF will seek to defend the Trump-Pence administration’s record while building what aides described as a “winning formula for a broader coalition.”

The Washington Examiner‘s Byron York noted that AAF seems focused on building a “post-Trump synthesis.”

The organization’s board includes longtime conservative leaders and Trump-Pence veterans, including former House Speaker Newt Gingrich; Gov. Doug Ducey (R-Ariz.); former Gov. Scott Walker (R-Wisc.); Heritage Foundation Founder Ed Fuelner; Trump aide Kellyanne Conway; top Trump economic advisor Larry Kudlow; Trump OMB Director Russ Vought; Reagan Attorney General Ed Meese; Club for Growth President David McIntosh; former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.); and others. Pence recruited Paul Teller — former chief of staff to Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), former executive director of the Republican Study Committee, and a deputy assistant to then-President Trump — to serve as AAF’s executive director.
York noted that “it is not hard to see them on a Pence for President committee.”

Yet another piece of news puts a wrinkle into the claim that Pence is laying the groundwork for a 2024 White House run. Not only did the former VP assemble that tremendous team of conservatives, but he also got his former boss on board.

“It was the most successful first term in American history,” Trump told the Examiner. “Nice to see Mike highlighting some of our many achievements!”
AAF represents the culmination of a few key Pence moves. In February, the former VP joined the Heritage Foundation as a distinguished visiting fellow and he joined Young America’s Foundation as the Ronald Reagan Presidential Scholar.

Also on Wednesday, CNN reported that Mike Pence had signed a multi-million-dollar book deal with Simon & Schuster.

Whether or not Pence aims to run for president in 2024, he is assembling a movement, building a platform for his ideas, and penning two books guaranteed to be best-sellers.

Byron York argued that “a Trump run in 2024 is highly, highly unlikely, and Pence and all those Republicans preparing to run will have to do the work of creating a new Republican Party while Trump is being Trump. There will be a fine line to walk between acknowledging Trump’s accomplishments and their debt to him, and creating a Republican agenda going forward. It will be a difficult job, but somebody will figure out how to do it.”

I wouldn’t be so sure Trump won’t throw his hat in the ring once again, but if he doesn’t, Pence is certainly on the shortlist for the 2024 GOP nomination, and these moves would bolster that position. Whatever Trump decides and however 2024 shakes out, Pence will have bolstered the conservative movement in the meantime. Building up the conservative movement is quite a legacy, whether it leads to the White House or not.
++++++++++++++++
[COMMENT]

caesar.JPG
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Trump-Wendy-Rogers-920x425.jpg
Image: Donald Trump, Wendy Rogers
WENDY ROGERS AND AZ SENATE PASS BILL KEEPING THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OUT OF THEIR ELECTIONS

BY: JOSHUA TROIANO
ON: APRIL 7, 2021

Freshman Republican State Senator Wendy Rogers, (AZ) celebrated on Twitter the recent passage of a bill Wednesday afternoon led by herself and the Arizona State Senate Republicans. This is yet another bill aimed at what GOP members of the legislature call “election integrity” which some Republicans claim is lacking nationwide.

“Glad to vote for and pass a great #ElectionIntegrity bill – HCR2023, a House Concurrent Resolution that tells the Feds to stay away from how Arizona handles our elections.”

1617923388117.png

With a party-line vote, HCR2023 passed by a 16-14 vote and will now be sent to the governor’s desk to more than likely be signed into law.

Since Senator Rogers has gotten into office, she has fought to pass bills in which she believes will strengthen the security of our elections and provide them with integrity. Numerous bills have been passed however, the other parts of the Arizona State government have refused to act on them leaving them dead in the water.

Republicans can only hope these bills are passed by the legislature and signed by the governor who many members of the GOP have called a “RINO” for his anti-trump bias.

The Arizona Senate, with the help of Rogers, passed HB2569 by a party-line vote (16-14) and Rogers claimed it would keep Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg from “meddling” in Arizona elections.

“I just voted for and we passed HB2569. Prohibits the state or other public body that conducts or administers elections from receiving or expending private monies for the purpose of preparing, administering or conducting an election.

No more election meddling by Zuckerberg!”

We will have to see if these bills do become law, or are once again neglected by the rest of the state.
1617923433727.png
Stay tuned to Media Right News for more updates.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

The Deep State Just Made Its “Declaration of War” Against MAGA Official

April 8, 2021 (5s ago)

2021.04.08-10.12-revolvernews-606f7fe531d7c.jpg


The Deep State just sent a declaration of war to American Patriots. This time, at least, they had the courtesy to all sign it.

On Wednesday afternoon, a collection of more than one hundred former government officials published an open letter to Congress demanding an “independent and bipartisan national commission” to “investigate” the January 6 disturbance at the U.S. Capitol.
Dear Members of Congress,

We are former senior national security, military, and elected officials who have represented or served Democrats, Republicans, or administrations of both parties. We write to encourage this Congress to establish an independent and bipartisan national commission to investigate the January 6th assault of the U.S. Capitol Complex and its direct causes, and to make recommendations to prevent future assaults and strengthen the resilience of our democratic institutions.
We also write to you with great urgency in light of what we collectively see as an exigent and growing threat. The events of January 6th exposed severe vulnerabilities in the nation’s preparedness for preventing and responding to domestic terrorist attacks. The immediate security failings that permitted a lethal breach of the Capitol Complex by armed extremists raise serious questions and demand immediate solutions.
But January 6th was also the result of complex national security threats. These include coordinated disinformation campaigns, nontransparent financing of extremist networks, potential foreign influences, and white supremacist violent extremism, which the Department of Homeland Security identified in an October 2020 report as among “the most persistent and lethal threat in the Homeland.” As FBI Director Christopher Wray testified to you recently, “January 6th was not an isolated event. The problem of domestic terrorism has been metastasizing across the country for a long time now and it’s not going away anytime soon.”
Understanding how these forces culminated in an attack on the infrastructure of our democracy is critical to preventing future attacks.
In the wake of September 11th, the administration and Congress jointly acknowledged that the attack’s causes were complex and that an independent and well-equipped national commission was an essential tool to aid the federal government. Congressional inquiries, law enforcement activities, and a national commission not only worked in parallel, but critically complemented each other’s necessary work. An independent commission should not supplant the ongoing work by the legislative and executive branches, but it can uniquely support them by providing comprehensive and expert recommendations for Congress to act upon.
Commissions — properly empowered, resourced, and led — can establish a full picture of events and an analysis of their causes, from which nonpartisan recommendations can authoritatively flow. With dedicated time, resources, and expert staffing, they can also exclusively focus on the matter at hand over an appropriate time horizon. Given the gravity of January 6th as a national security matter — the violent disruption to the transition of power and the continuing threat of future attacks — a national commission examining the lead up to the January 6th assault, and the attendant security lapses, is not only appropriate, but a critical component of the national response.
A failure to deploy the full suite of tools available to fully understand January 6th and address its causes will leave the Capitol, and the nation, vulnerable to future attacks. In bipartisan fashion, we have successfully marshaled these tools before, and we implore you to do so once again. [Former Nat. Sec., Military, & Elected Officials]
What an absolute masterpiece of cynical mendacity.
January 6 was not a case of “domestic terrorism.” There were no “armed extremists” executing a “lethal breach” of the Capitol Complex. Only one individual has been charged with illegally bringing a gun into the Capitol. The only shots fired at the Capitol on January 6th were fired by a Capitol policeman who shot unarmed civilian Ashli Babbitt through the neck. There was no planned assault. January 6 absolutely was an isolated event. The Capitol riot was the product of bad police crowd control rather than a concerted plan to attack anyone or anything.

It’s all obvious from the wording of the letter, and all so predictable.

From the breathless wording of their letter, one can surmise that these federal goons believe that the only way to fight a so-called “coordinated disinformation campaign” is with restrictions on free speech, social media bans and criminal prosecutions for “disinformation.”

The Deep State will want to fight the so-called “nontransparent funding of extremist networks” with new financial laws to end anonymous political donations and dox those providing support to causes unpopular inside the Beltway.

They will use the phantom threat of “white supremacists” to transform patriots of all backgrounds into nascent terrorists who must be purged from America’s institutions as an internal ideological threat.

The wording of the letter isn’t unprecedented. The Deep State apparatchiks who authored the letter liberal employ rhetorical stunts that are typically used to stoke wars and color revolutions around the globe. What’s changed is that now, instead of targeting regimes that stand against the Globalist American Empire, their rhetoric targets domestic enemies instead.

Revolver warned about the rise of “counter-American intelligence” a few weeks in the seminal expose, “Dark New Dem Bill Uses “Counter American Intelligence” To Wage War on MAGA”:
What we are witnessing, in effect, is a foreign counterintelligence operation turned inward and aimed directly at the American people. “Counterintelligence” concerns insider threats to the operational integrity of US military-intelligence organizations and missions. As originally designed, American counter-intelligence is meant to prevent the American security apparatus from being infiltrated by hostile foreign actors.
What we are seeing now, however, is something quite different — a deliberate effort to cleanse our entire security apparatus of patriots — perhaps as preparation for a full scale effort to cleanse the entire country of American patriots, or anyone, for that matter, who objects to the open air prison that the Globalist American Empire has become.
Traditional counter-intelligence techniques, strategies, and mindsets are being re-purposed domestically, in order to cleanse the entire U.S. national security apparatus, including the DOD, of latent political sympathies.

Today, the top target of this Counter-American Intelligence operation is President Trump’s MAGA movement.
Adding insult to injury, the U.S. national security state’s pretext for launching this operation was itself based on the wild-eyed conspiracy theory that thousands of Trump supporters in military and law enforcement are training in state-sanctioned violence by day, then secretly moonlighting as vigilante militiamen plotting government overthrow by night. They’re forming networks, the theory goes, and now it’s the nation’s top national security threat. [Revolver News]
But the most offensive part of the letter isn’t its hideous demands for a MAGA witch hunt. No, the worst part is simply the list of “senior officials” who put their name to the letter.

At least twelve of the signatories of this obscene and atrocious letter held senior positions at the Department of Defense. Thirteen are veterans of the CIA. Twenty-three were ambassadors. More than two dozen were members of Congress. The list of more than 100 names is a (sometimes literal) murderer’s row of the American ruling class from 1990 through the present; the class of dilettantes, mediocrities, incompetents, and frauds who squandered America’s superpower status, bankrupted the middle class with wars and bank bailouts, and led this country to the brink of ruin.

President Donald Trump’s “Make America Great Again” movement arose in part to simply repair the damage caused by the Deep State’s catastrophic mismanagement of foreign policy. Now, the entrenched career bureaucrats of the Deep State want that movement annihilated.

The events of January 6th provided them with a fig leaf they needed to excuse their war on Trump and the America First movement. Without January 6th, they’d have found or fabricated some other excuse to say the exact same thing.

But if any group of people deserves a bipartisan commission to investigate their crimes, it’s the signatories of this letter.

James Clapper committed open perjury before the Senate Intelligence Committee. When asked directly whether the NSA collected bulk data from ordinary Americans, Clapper categorically said they did not. Mere months later, whistleblower Edward Snowden exposed Clapper’s lie. While Clapper should have been arrested and sent to prison, he was instead left untouched, and rewarded with a CNN job after leaving the White House.

Michael McFaul was Barack Obama’s ambassador to Russia, who in the last five years has reinvented himself as one of the leading advocates for “color revolutions,” or as McFaul prefers to label them, “democratic breakthroughs.”

Besides literally writing the book on such revolutions, McFaul spent years trying to foment a “democratic breakthrough” here in the U.S. Not always the brightest bulb, McFaul was shockingly blunt about what he was trying to do. In September 2020, he tweeted (and then deleted) the following:

2021.04.08-05.41-revolvernews-606f4053695e8.png

Now, having executed his color revolution in America, McFaul wants an ideological crackdown to make sure the new regime cannot ever be challenged, externally or internally.

As CIA Director, Michael Hayden built his reputation telling one lie after another to bolster the U.S. intelligence apparatus while threatening its critics.

In 2017, Hayden reacted to President Trump’s allegation of wiretapping by saying it “couldn’t happen” since that would be illegal.

How quaint! In fact, after the 9/11 attacks, Hayden himself spearheaded a program to spy on Americans’ phone calls without running it by a single court.

Hayden “joked” about putting Edward Snowden on a targeted assassination list.

He bragged that stealing the emails of foreign political parties is “what we do.”

A 2014 Senate report on the CIA’s torture program concludes with more than three dozen pages of appendix breaking down all the lies Hayden told to the Senate Intelligence Committee. In the words of the Columbia Journalism Review:
Hayden has a long history of making misleading and outright false statements, and by the estimation of many lawyers, likely committed countless felonies during the Bush administration. It is something of a wonder that someone responsible for so many reprehensible acts is now considered a totally above-the-fray, honest commentator on all issues intelligence. [CJR]
Alexander Vindman is the Ukraine-born defense official who decided that he, not the elected U.S. president, had the right to set America’s foreign policy toward his home country. Vindman, who was three times offered the post of Ukrainian defense minister, went rogue after deciding his policy for Ukraine was better than President Trump’s. After President Trump requested an investigation into Hunter Biden’s corruption, Vindman violated Article 88 of the Code of Military Justice, deciding that he, not the Commander in Chief, got to dictate American foreign policy. Vindman more or less admitted this in his own 2019 impeachment testimony:
I was concerned by the call. I did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen, and I was worried about the implications for the U.S. government’s support of Ukraine. I realized that if Ukraine pursued an investigation into the Bidens and Burisma, it would likely be interpreted as a partisan play which would undoubtedly result in Ukraine losing the bipartisan support it has thus far maintained. This would all undermine U.S. national security. [NPR]
Byron York’s 2020 book Obsession reveals that Vindman himself was the one who got the impeachment ball rolling by encouraging Eric Ciaramella’s politically-motivated “whistleblower” report to Congress. Vindman’s stunt did far more to undermine America’s democratic government than anything that happened January 6, but he’ll never face real consequences for it, because his rebellion was on behalf of the status quo rather than against it.

Zach Wamp, a 16-year Congressman from Tennessee, is one of the more obscure signatories of the petition. But Wamp’s signature is proof that nothing in the letter is motivated by actual fears of an insurrection against the government. In 2010, Wamp suggested that ObamaCare might be bad enough to justify a secession movement:
“I hope that the American people will go to the ballot box in 2010 and 2012 so that states are not forced to consider separation from this government.” [US News]
Wamp broaching secession is far more extreme than anything from Ted Cruz, Josh Hawley, or the vast majority of the MAGA movement, and thus reveals the sham at the heart of this narrative. This isn’t about stopping secessionist or insurrectionist rhetoric. It’s about crushing anyone who wants serious changes to the American system. Even the most restrained and reasoned attack on the Globalist American Empire’s agenda of open borders, endless wars, and cultural imperialism, must now be met with maximum force–the full force of the American national security state.

Similarly, former Connecticut Congressman Chris Shays is very concerned about danger of “violent insurrectionists,” most of whom attacked nobody. This is a break from the past, where Shays has been tolerant of all kinds of wrongdoing:
“Now I’ve seen what happened in Abu Ghraib, and Abu Ghraib was not torture,” Shays said at a debate Wednesday. “It was outrageous, outrageous involvement of National Guard troops from (Maryland) who were involved in a sex ring and they took pictures of soldiers who were naked,” added Shays. “And they did other things that were just outrageous. But it wasn’t torture.” [AP]
Perhaps Shays was just eager to protect American troops from vicious attacks. Surely he’d be more incensed about sexual abuse of Americans.
The congressional sex scandal threatening House Speaker Dennis Hastert got even nastier yesterday, as Republican Rep. Chris Shays of Connecticut delivered a searing indictment of Sen. Ted Kennedy’s fateful actions at Chappaquiddick.
“I know the speaker didn’t go over a bridge and leave a young person in the water and then have a press conference the next day,” Shays fumed.
“Dennis Hastert didn’t kill anybody,” he told the Hartford Courant.
Shays slammed Kennedy after Shays’ Democratic opponent, Westport Selectwoman Diane Farrell, called on Hastert to resign because of his handling of Rep. Mark Foley’s seduction attempts on boys. Kennedy made a campaign appearance with Farrell last week. [NY Post]
Hmm, guess not.

Revolver could continue on for ages. Signatory Francis Fukuyama’s vision of The End of History provided the framework for the Iraq War and three decades of disastrous neoconservative interventions dressed up as campaigns to promote “democracy.” Eric Edelman agitated for the U.S. to impose sanctions on Turkey, because America evidently doesn’t have enough enemies and should punish its nominal allies. Tom Daschle, Dick Gephardt, and other lawmakers on the list spent years providing the votes for the globalist agenda of endless wars coupled with zero border security at home.

In a sane country, the signatories of this letter would be the ones getting investigated, or at least exiled from public life before they could utterly destroy the land they rule. Instead, they’re making a bid to render dissent against their corrupt, dysfunctional, evil, and illegitimate regime a criminal offense.

Just another day in the Globalist American Empire.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Arizona Rep. Mark Finchem on Voting Laws and Voter IDs: “Can Ya’ Just Show Me the Evidence?”

By Joe Hoft
Published April 8, 2021 at 5:11pm
finchem-az.jpg

Guest post by Arizona Rep. Mark Finchem

Did you know that you must present a photo identification to get your COVID vaccine shots, buy cigarettes, alcoholic beverages, cold medicines, fly on airplanes, drive cars, open bank accounts, lease apartments, get mortgages, get hotel rooms, buy a can of compressed air (dusting your computer keyboard) at Walmart, rent tools at Home Depot, rent carpet cleaning machines, cash cheques, or enter a committee meeting at the Democrat National Convention?

You absolutely must have one to get a PPP loan, an EBT card, to get a job, fly on a commercial airplane, visit your federal or state legislators’ offices. You must have a photo ID to enter a federal courthouse, indeed entry into almost every government building requires one.

Many common forms require applicants to copy information from their ID onto the form (e.g., one’s Driver’s License number).

Thoughtfully, sixteen states—including California, New Mexico, Illinois, and New York— and the District of Columbia offer photo IDs to undocumented residents. Some provide them at no cost.

Activists claim that requiring a positive ID to vote is racist, implying that there are millions of unserved and underserved Americans that would be prevented from voting if IDs were required; that these millions cannot access common services or do business with retailers because they do not have a photo ID. Alternatively, they claim many people are incapable of copying information from their ID onto critical forms, such as an absentee ballot.

A friend related a recent experience: he returned to his Home Depot a planter that he had purchased a month ago. Due to a price change, he was given a $7.50 refund to his credit card and a $1.50 in-store credit, but he had to show a photo ID to get the in-store credit. When he went to purchase another product with the in-store credit he had to show his ID again. What, pray-tell, would have happened had he not had a photo ID? Home Depot seems to assume shoppers have photo IDs.

Opt-in Voter ID is important, no government should ever force everyone to obtain an ID. [WHAT??]

Some professional politicians and several major corporations would have us believe that getting a state-issued photo ID is onerous, and is somehow an infringement on voter rights. If true, we must address the “inequity” and see to it that everyone that wants an ID gets one. We must implement a plan to provide government-issued Positive ID (PID) cards to every individual who does not have one. This will help every one of the unserved and underserved in our communities whose activities are restricted because they do not have a PID. The cards will not only help the unserved and underserved with banking, and business transactions but will also help them with exercising their personal franchise to vote. As well, it will prevent someone else from canceling out their vote with a false attempt—i.e., using their name to vote before the real voter actually goes to the polls.

Voting is an important right and responsibility in our republic: everyone that can vote legally and wishes to do so, should vote without pressure and interference, and their vote should be counted once. Votes should be counted, tabulated, and reported in a timely manner. It really is that simple and should be no more difficult than buying a book or a movie from Amazon (where I must validate my ID and method of payment) or buying Sudafed at CVS (again, a valid ID is required), or to receive the COVID-19 vaccine (yup, once again a positive ID required). Are marginalized people being denied books, movies, Sudafed, and the COVID vaccine? Lets fix that. Get them a reliable, FREE Positive ID.

Laws, regulations, and processes should balance voting access with election integrity. Any proposed change in access should address integrity associated with the change: for no-excuse absentee voting, how will the government election apparatus ensure that the voter is who they claim to be, alive, eligible, and votes only once for the correct slate of candidates/proposals.

On the matter of “voter suppression,” those that claim it exists should provide proof, just as they demanded for allegations of fraud in 2020. Who? When? How? How about some proof before we change the laws. Shouldn’t we be as concerned about prospective integrity as prospective suppression? Public policy formation is a deliberative process, and ought to based on facts, not unproven allegations and straw man arguments.

Ballot harvesting is problematic, voter drives have happened for years; you’d be a fool to hold one in an area likely to attract people likely to vote for your opponent. On the other hand, it creates an opportunity for abuse and fraud. What regulations and processes can minimize abuse and fraud? Should one be allowed to help a targeted group of people to request absentee/mail-in ballots, and facilitate the return of those completed (compliant) ballots? Perhaps.

Those that use the elderly and infirmed to perpetrate election fraud through harvesting should be subject to elder abuse laws because those elderly voters are being defrauded of their voting franchise. According to John Lott (Newsweek, April 5, 2021) “Twenty-eight envelopes from one nursing home in the Missoula, MT audit, “allegedly had the same signature. Many dozens of envelopes had identical signatures, but the audit wasn’t allowed to determine the precise number of them. Nor did election officials allow pictures of these identical signatures despite multiple requests.”

Apparently, some people think there are millions of people in the US that aren’t able to do any of these things.
  • Early (in-person) voting? I have no particular problem with early voting, although some posit that everyone voting on the same day—election day—creates a stronger sense of community. Christmas, Ramadan, Quansah, Easter, Memorial Day,… all happen for all on the same days creating the sense of community.
Early voting eliminates late-breaking news from the voter’s decision, and increases the risk of voting in multiple locations (e.g., Georgia, and Arizona a week later). It also raises the question of counting: when shall early votes be counted/tabulated? Doing it on election day can delay reporting; doing it before election day and keeping the tabulation secret and secure would seem to be a challenge.
  • Mail-in voting? This one is fraught with problems: Should one have a reason/excuse for a mail-in ballot (NY requires a reason)? How can the voter/vote be authenticated? Again, each voter gets one vote, counted once.
  • To protect the chain of custody for one’s ballot, should unsupervised drop-boxes be permitted? Shall anti-electioneering laws apply to drop-boxes (e.g., no campaign activity within a certain number of feet of the box)?
  • How shall returned ballots be secured? How shall fraudulent ballots be detected?
  • How/when shall valid ballots be collected and tabulated?
  • What deadlines make sense, given USPS and local government capabilities?
  • When must mail-in reporting be complete?
  • What shall be done with applications/ballots that do not comport with deadlines/regulations?
  • Shouldn’t voters have a remedy period to cure their defective ballots?
Empirically, it’s clear that states do not have the systems and processes to support high-integrity, high volume mail-in voting. This also seems true for the states that have been using mail-in voting for years. It’s also clear that processes and systems—solutions—that are appropriate for New York are likely different from those that are appropriate for Arizona. And the systems and processes should be designed, tested and implemented (and litigated) well before the election—a deadline for suits challenging election laws makes sense, as well as court decisions and consent decrees that alter the application of laws. A state law that gives plaintiffs standing to sue before the election—they aren’t actually injured until the election—might help.
  • Purging voter rolls? If a state cannot keep track of live, eligible voters… how does it claim voting integrity? That would seem to be job one.
  • We can argue about and design an effective and fair process, but a process there must be.
A classical conservative would ask, “How can we improve access? What might be the unintended consequences of proposed changes in access?” and “How can we improve integrity? What might be the unintended consequences of proposed changes?” S/he will then propose incremental changes—incremental to avoid massive unintended consequences. Then watch for the intended and unintended consequences.

Both classical conservatives and liberals alike would demand that each eligible voter has an opportunity to vote without pressure from any group.

A classical radical (non-pejoratively speaking) would ask “What’s wrong with access?”; “Let’s change it.” and “What’s wrong with integrity?” and “Let’s change it.” With no thought to unintended consequences. Human nature being what it is—we hide our mistakes—unintended negative consequences are seldom discussed by government, and less seldom addressed.

To the current Georgia voting law kerfuffle, the facts depart widely from the reporting—early voting is being expended, drop-box voting is being formalized (it was not legal in Georgia), water and refreshments can be served to people waiting to vote but without electioneering. Georgia’s new law is less restrictive than New York’s or Delaware’s current laws. Biden’s comments are nonsensical and without basis. Moving the MLB all-star game and draft hurts Atlanta economically, a racially mixed area, and its businesses. It means a lot less to everyone else in Georgia. Should we also boycott this week’s Masters Golf Tournament? Should “woke” Georgia executives renounce their memberships at Augusta National? Leave the state? Hardly not, this is not a solution to any problem.

On the integrity question, you’ll find a recent audit on the election in Missoula Count (MT) interesting. Montana Ballot Audit Shows the Risks of Mail-in Vote Fraud | Opinion (msn.com).

Who is making money off of “voter suppression narrative?

That would make for a helluva hearing.


Finally, it would seem that those proposing nearly unfettered access to the ballot box assume (1) their opponents will not cheat, or (2) they can always cheat more effectively than their opponents. Birmingham (AL) 1960 would have loved the idea of unrestricted mail-in ballots, as would have George Wallace (1968). The Mississippi voter drive of the 1960s would have been a waste of effort and life.

Ironically, the easiest way for me to fight your improved access is with degraded integrity: You sign-up five previously disenfranchised voters—only three of whom actually vote; I submit four fraudulent ballots.

Mark Finchem is running for Arizona Secretary of State. You can support his campaign here.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Man Carrying Confederate Flag Through Capitol on Jan. 6 Hit with Additional 5-Count Indictment

By Cristina Laila
Published April 8, 2021 at 6:21pm
IMG_9916.jpg
Getty
The man photographed carrying a confederate flag through the Capitol on January 6 was indicted on five additional counts by a grand jury on Thursday, CNBC reported.

Kevin Seefried and his son Hunter Seefried were arrested a few days after the Capitol riot and indicted on three counts including violent entry, entering a restricted building and disorderly conduct.

The father and son were both hit with five additional counts on Thursday: Obstruction of an official proceeding and aiding and abetting; entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds; disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted building or grounds; disorderly conduct in a Capitol building; and parading, demonstrating, or picketing in a Capitol building.

Hunter Seefried also faces charges of entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds with physical violence against property; destruction of government property; and act of physical violence in the Capitol grounds or buildings.

CNBC reported:
Kevin Seefried, who was photographed carrying a Confederate flag in the U.S. Capitol during the Jan. 6 riots in Washington, has been indicted by a grand jury on five counts related to obstruction, entering restricted property and disorderly conduct.
Advertisement - story continues below

Seefried’s son, Hunter Seefried, was also indicted. The younger Seefried faces the same five counts as his father in addition to three charges related to destruction of government property and violence on Capitol grounds.
An affidavit signed by FBI Special Agent Katherine Pattillo filed in connection with the case in January said that authorities reviewed video footage allegedly showing the Seefrieds entering the Capitol via a broken window.

The two were identified, according to the affidavit, after a co-worker of Hunter Seefried told the FBI that Hunter had “bragged about being in the Capitol with his father on January 6, 2021.”
Pattillo also wrote that she reviewed footage posted to Twitter that allegedly shows Hunter Seefried “punching out glass in a window in the Capitol complex after people adjacent to him in the crowd broke it with a wooden 2 x 4.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Georgia Secretary of State in “Cover-Up Mode” – Is Fighting to Keep Fulton County Ballots Hidden from Investigators – What’s He Hiding?

By Jim Hoft
Published April 8, 2021 at 6:30pm
raffensperger-dirty.jpg


Garland Favorito, the co-founder of VoterGA, witnessed a sudden surge of 20,000 mail-in votes for Joe Biden in the early hours on November 5th. At the same time approximately 1,000 votes for President Trump disappeared.
In March a Georgia judge ruled that Favorito’s group “Voter GA” would be allowed to unseal the Fulton County Georgia ballots and inspect them for invalid votes.

Then earlier this week conflicted Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger petitioned the court to keep the Fulton County ballots sealed.

What is he hiding?
Now Garland Favorito is speaking out. Favorito accused Raffensperger of being in “cover-up mode” by his recent actions.



Just The News reported:
An attempt by Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to block physical inspection of ballots cast in Fulton County, Ga. in the November presidential election is part of an election fraud “coverup,” voting integrity activist Garland Favorito charged Tuesday in an interview with Just the News.
In December 2020, Favorito’s organization Voter GA filed a suit against the then-chairperson of the Fulton County Board of Elections based on a sudden, implausible spike of 20,000 votes in favor of Joe Biden on election night, along with sworn testimony from hand count auditors who say they saw batches of counterfeit ballots during the county’s post-election hand recount. The witnesses cite uncreased ballots, different paper stock, and ballots marked with toner instead of writing implements as reasons for their suspicions.

Based on the affidavits and other evidence, the judge in the case found probable cause to conditionally unseal the county’s ballots for a forensic audit. Voter GA was given until March 25 to submit a plan to the judge detailing what the audit would look like — which experts they were going to use, where the audit would take place, etc.

Last week, Raffensperger, who is not a party to the suit, filed an amicus brief in an attempt to block the effort to unseal and examine the ballots. a Republican who has resisted demands by former President Donald Trump and others to investigate claims of vote-counting mischief in the state’s 2020 presidential vote,

In the months following the November election, Raffensperger unbendingly defended the validity of the ballots cast in Georgia. In the process, he emerged as a vocal critic of former President Donald Trump, who repeatedly told Raffensperger that if his office scrutinized the ballots in Fulton County, they would find election cheating.
Favorito believes Raffensperger filed his amicus brief because Trump is right, and the secretary of state has something to hide. Raffensperger is “in coverup mode,” alleged Favorito. “There’s nothing new in this brief that concerns us. What concerns us is that we have a secretary of state who doesn’t believe in election integrity.”
Read the rest here.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

The Election Audits Are The Key To Bringing Back America
by L Todd WoodApril 8, 202114983
Screen-Shot-2021-04-08-at-10.57.12-AM-1024x640.png


There is a LOT of political noise out there right now. From illegitimate Biden’s spending, starting a war with Russia in Ukraine, appeasing Iran, and kowtowing to the Chinese Communist Party, it’s easy to get lost in the horrific OBiden daily news cycle.

However, there is one truth we must keep at the forefront in our fight to restore the American republic — the election audits in the fraud states are the way forward.

BECAUSE – with election fraud transparency, comes delegitimizing the OBiden regime.

Right now, they are fighting tooth and nail to keep ANY evidence from emerging about what really happened on Nov 3rd and Jan 5th in GA. They know, that once public opinion starts to turn — the House falls in 2022 and maybe the Senate, and the OBiden agenda gets crushed in Congress. Believe it or not, even those Democrat politicians are still worried about re-election. The planned fraud can only cover so much of a GOP lead, and now the Deplorables are watching!
Once the corrupt Left can’t protect their co-conspirators from the voters anymore, Katy bar the door…watch the rats jump ship.

Pelosi, Biden, Rice, Schumer, Zuckerberg, Tim Cook…they all know this. Hence, they are turning up the repression and censorship to 11, and pushing to ram through their agenda as soon as possible.

In AZ, patriots are fighting the Maricopa County GOP-controlled elections board for access to ballots for a court-directed audit. In Fulton County, GA, VoterGA.org has a hearing on April 13th to approve procedures for an audit. In New Hampshire, patriots are forcing an audit in Windham County.

Senate Bill SB43 mandates an audit of Windham’s disturbing November 3, 2020 general election results that produced a massive discrepancy between the machine vote tally for the State Rep race on election day and a hand recount 9 days later. The recount showed a difference of 1,363 votes for the State Rep race being shifted with only 10,006 ballots were cast. That is a big discrepancy – and we need to know why!, writes The Gateway Pundit.

The audits are the key — we need to keep our eye on the prize. Wins in multiple states to out the fraud will be the spark to win back America from the communist coup!
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Arizona’s Legislature Passes Law Against Democrats’ ‘Corrupt Politician’s Act (HR1)’ – “Shut Up, Sit Down and Keep Your Hands Off Our Elections”

By Joe Hoft
Published April 9, 2021 at 9:55am
Arizona-gop-AZ.jpg

Arizona standing up to DC Democrats’ attempt to corrupt elections from now for a thousand years.

Breitbart reported yesterday:
The Arizona State Legislature passed a resolution on Tuesday vowing defiance of HR 1, the effort by Democrats to nationalize the administration of elections described by its opponents as “The Corrupt Politicians Act.”
The Democrat-controlled U.S. House of Representatives passed the bill on March 3 in a straight party line vote, 220 to 210, and it is currently under consideration in the U.S. Senate.

“[T]he Members of the Legislature oppose H.R. 1 and any subsequent enactment of the terms of this proposal and implore the Members of the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate to oppose the same,” the Arizona State Legislature’s concurrent resolution declares. (emphasis added)
The Arizona State Senate passed House Concurrent Resolution (HCR) 2023 late Tuesday, also in a straight party line vote, 16 to 14, one month after the Arizona House of Representatives passed the resolution in another straight party line vote, 31 to 29.
We’ve reported on HR1 – the first bill proposed by the Democrats after they stole the 2020 Election for President. This bill is the most disgusting piece of legislature ever. It’s doubtful if it can even be constitutional.
Arizona Representative Jake Hoffman shared the following with us:
Jake-Hoffman.jpg

“Arizona is not going to stand idly by while Democrats in DC attempt the largest power grab in American history by federalizing states’ elections laws, effectively rigging the nation’s electoral process in their favor. The people of Arizona do not want the horrible election policies of Illinois, New Jersey, and California forced on them, and they certainly don’t want taxpayer-funded federal campaigns that allow federal candidates to pay themselves an up to $600,000 salary off of those taxpayer-funded campaigns. The Arizona legislature is sending a clear message to the corrupt politicians in DC—shut up, sit down & keep your hands off our elections.”
Every state should pass a similar law to stop the Obama/Biden Democrats from making the US a communist nation.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Five Months Since the Election, Georgia Still Lacks Legally Required Chain of Custody Documentation on 355,000 Votes (Most All Likely for Joe Biden)
By Joe Hoft
Published April 9, 2021 at 10:40am
kemp-raffensperger.jpg

Georgia still has over 350,000 votes (most likely nearly all for Joe Biden) that are invalid and yet were counted in the 2020 election. These illegal ballots helped Joe Biden win Georgia by 11,000 votes.

We first reported on December 26, 2020, that Georgia had 460,000 ballots that were missing legally required chain of custody documentation from the 2020 Election. Despite these legally required documents not being present, the Secretary of State Raffensperger and Governor Kemp (both Republicans) certified the election win for Joe Biden by 11,000 votes.

Georgia’s Corrupt Republican Leadership Gave Joe Biden Win By Less Than 12,000 Votes – Yet 460,000 Drop Box Ballots STILL MISSING Chain of Custody Documentation Required by Law

Now today, five months since the 2020 Election, these legally required documents are still nowhere to be found.

The Georgia Star reported yesterday:
Five months after the November 3, 2020 presidential election, officials at the state and county level in Georgia have failed to produce chain of custody records for more than 355,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes located around the state for that election.
Advertisement - story continues below

Joe Biden was certified as the victor of Georgia and its 16 Electoral College votes by a margin of 11,599 votes, or less than 0.25 percent of the 5 million votes cast in the November 3, 2020 presidential election in Georgia. According to the Georgia Secretary of State’s office, 1.3 million of those votes were cast as absentee vote by mail ballots.
Based on polling conducted by John McLaughlin & Associates, 700,000 of those absentee vote by mail ballots were sent via regular mail and 600,000 were deposited in the estimated 300 drop boxes located around the state and were manually picked up and transported by election workers to the local county registrar for subsequent counting.
According to Georgia Election Code Emergency Rule 183-1-14-0.8-.14, promulgated by the Georgia State Election Board in July 2020, but not codified by the state legislature at the time as the Georgia Constitution requires, each of Georgia’s 159 counties is responsible for documenting the transfer of every batch of absentee ballots picked up at drop boxes and delivered to the county election offices with ballot transfer forms. The forms are required to be signed and dated, with time of pick up by the collection team upon pick up, and then signed, dated, with time of delivery by the registrar or designee upon receipt and accepted.
How could the results in Georgia and likely other states in the 2020 election include 355,000 invalid votes – most likely all for Joe Biden? What happened to our laws and law enforcement?
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

The Democrats in Arizona Are Very Scared – They’re Bringing in Marc Elias’s Perkins Coie to Make Threats and Make the Maricopa County Audit Go Away

By Joe Hoft
Published April 9, 2021 at 11:00am
P ShareEmail
arizona-flag-1.jpg

Patriots in Arizona are under attack by far-left lunatics who disregard nonprofit laws to fund their anti-American actions.


The national Democratic machine is in panic mode over the Arizona Senate’s Maricopa County ballot audit. On Tuesday, the Democrats sent in national fixer attorney Marc Elias’s firm Perkins Coie to throw around threats and make the audit go away.

The stakes are astronomical for the Dems, after all the November 3, 2020 election steal gained them the presidency and control of both houses. The swing states in which the 2020 election steal occurred are key to uncovering the truth and proving the fraud in the election and Arizona is one of those states.

Steve Bannon of the WarRoom Pandemic, Peter Navarro, who wrote an incredible three-part analysis explaining the 2020 election steal, The Navarro Report, and Mike Lindell, who co-produced and hosted two documentaries about the 2020 election steal, have all repeatedly stated ‘that if just one of these swing states fall, they’ll all fall like a house of cards.’

So, to prevent ‘this house of cards from falling’ and any election tampering and fraud being exposed, the Democratic hit team blew into Arizona, a top Democrat-run nonprofit at the helm, with three law firms in tow to shut this thing in Arizona down.

Mark Elias’s favorite hammer is a nonprofit. Low and behold, whom do we find deployed in the threat, via an e-letter to the AZ Senate’s four chosen audit firms but the “Protect Democracy Project,” a 501(c)(3) charity, which is required by law, more so than other types of nonprofits, to remain strictly nonpartisan. (This act doesn’t look non-partisan.)

We wrote about this yesterday:
Perkins Coie and Marc Elias, Hillary Clinton’s consigliere, were, remember, responsible for the fabricated and discredited Steele Dossier which was a vicious, partisan attempt by the Democrats to remove Republican President Donald Trump from office.

The Protect Democracy Project (PDP) nonprofit, which is in reality functioning as a weaponized, political tool of the Democrats, sicced not one, not two, but three law firms on the Arizona Senate’s audit teams: Perkins Coie and two Arizona firms, Coppersmith Brockelman, and Barton Mendez Soto. With a hefty $12.4 million in revenue as of 2019 and a whopping 72 staff members, many of whom are attorneys, the PDP is a rich and powerful nonprofit and can afford to engage the legal muscle needed to enforce the Democrat billionaire’s will.

We’ve reported on how the PDP is tied to Soros, China, Obama and Biden:
This charity effectively provides Perkins Coie with the one-off camo and the appearance of do-gooders doing good necessary so that it can actually execute the raw will of the national Democratic machine, without appearing to do so.

Never mind the will of the people of Arizona and their state Senate and never mind IRS rules which require this type of NFP – a (c)(3) – to never, ever take political sides. Perkins Coie and its nonprofit lapdog have a mission to stop this audit and laws, rules, and the will of the Arizona people are simply in their way.
This nonprofit’s actions are an attempt to interfere in the process of securing an honest, accurate and trustworthy ballot audit and its interference favors the Democratic Party. That’s anything but nonpartisan nonprofit activity!

As expected, the day the letter was released, on April 6, 2021 Marc Elias’s website, Democracy Docket LLC, issued a statement about it. It revealed that even more threats and more nonprofit and legal muscle will be coming down the pike if the Arizona Senate does not back down:
Multiple voting rights lawyers and advocacy groups have signed a letter outlining their intention to sue if the unfounded Republican-led audit of Maricopa County’s election results goes forward with their planned intimidation tactics…
Who is Marc Elias? Why does his name always appear whenever there are Democrat elections which need fixing? A partner at the powerful Perkins Coie law firm, he is the head of its political law practice, which assists Democratic political committees and candidates (e.g., Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, the DNC, House & Senate Majority PACs). Influence Watch states that:

Following the November 2018 mid-term election, Elias and the Perkins-Coie political law group will have as clients all but three of the Democratic U.S. Senators, and 100 Democratic members of the U.S. House of Representatives.
Furthermore, billionaire George Soros money follows where Marc Elias goes. In 2016, Soros gave $5 million to Elias and his firm to challenge photo ID requirements at polling places. When Elias joined the board of Priorities USA in 2017, which has similar “election integrity” goals (and, naturally, a related nonprofit, Priorities USA Action), Soros, in 2018, donated $5 million to its super PAC.
Arizona needs to stand strong against this liberal attack. Please know Arizona that America has your back.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
WIsconsin Supreme Court Rules Voters Can Stay on Voter Rolls Even After They Move

By Jim Hoft
Published April 9, 2021 at 2:22pm
12-600x400.jpeg

The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled on Friday that voters can stay on the voter rolls even after they move.

Of course, the ruling is insane and adds more confusion to the election process.

The Wisconsin Institute for Law and liberty says it is now up to the legislature to ensure fair and free elections and fix the law.

The Sentinel-Journal reported:

The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled Friday that state election officials do not have to quickly take people off the voter rolls when they suspect they may have moved.
The 5-2 ruling means the Wisconsin Elections Commission will not force tens of thousands of people off the rolls near a major election, such as the 2022 contest for governor and U.S. Senate.


From the outset, the case has been fraught with politics. Conservatives who brought the lawsuit said they wanted to make sure the state’s voter lists are accurate, while Democrats and election officials warned a change in state policy could result in some voters being bumped off the rolls when they shouldn’t be.
The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty issued a statement following today’s ruling.
The News: The Wisconsin Supreme Court issued a 5-2 decision, Friday, that the Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) does not have a duty to remove voters from the rolls who have been flagged as having moved from their voting address. The Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty (WILL) sued WEC in November 2019 on behalf of three Wisconsin voters.
Quote: WILL President and General Counsel, Rick Esenberg, said, “This is a disappointing setback for those who expect Wisconsin state agencies to follow the law. The Court held today that the legislature created a duty and failed to provide an effective way for that duty to be carried out or enforced by voters. We respectfully disagree. It is now up to the legislature to fix the law. WILL remains committed to the rule of law and to a reasonable set of election rules that acknowledges that the right to vote involves both convenience and assurances of accuracy and integrity.”

Background: WILL sued the Wisconsin Elections Commission, on behalf of three Wisconsin voters, because the state agency made a decision in 2019 to leave old and outdated voter registrations on the voter rolls for 12 to 24 months. At a hearing on December 13, 2019 Ozaukee County Circuit Court Judge, Paul Malloy, ordered the Wisconsin Elections Commission to immediately comply with state law – cleaning up the voter rolls and removing registrations from outdated addresses.

After a petition to bypass to the Supreme Court resulted in a 3-3 tie (Justice Kelly recused), the Court of Appeals issued a stay on Judge Malloy’s decision on January 14, 2020 and overturned and remanded the decision on February 28.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Former Trump attorney Powell defends self against a $2.5 billion Smartmatic defamation lawsuit

"I stand by my statements about Smartmatic today I believe every allegation I have made," Powell said in her statement.
Image
Attorney Sidney Powell speaks at the RNC headquarters in Washington, D.C., on Nov. 19, 2020.

Sidney Powell at a the RNC Nov. 2020.
(Photo by Sarah Silbiger for The Washington Post via Getty Images)

By Nicholas Sherman
Updated: April 9, 2021 - 1:25pm

Former Trump attorney Sidney Powell is defending her comments about Smartmatic while trying to overturn the result of the 2020 presidential election and is asking the courts to dismiss the $2.5 billion defamation suit the election-technology company has filed against her.

"Smartmatic’s desperate attempt to suggest I was a part of a civil conspiracy to harm the company is not only false but also still does not allow me to be sued in New York," Powell said Thursday in a statement. "Smartmatic fails to even remotely allege any way that I was a part of a conspiracy. And for the record, I was not."

Smartmatic alleging Powell defamed the company in the aftermath of the 2020 presidential election by claiming its software was hacked and compromised and further alleging that the company was under the corrupt control of dictators from socialist countries.

After saying such statements about several election technology companies, former President Donald Trump distanced himself from Powell.

"Sidney Powell is practicing law on her own. She is not a member of the Trump Legal Team. She is also not a lawyer for the President in his personal capacity," Giuliani and another lawyer for Trump, Jenna Ellis, said in a statement in November, according to the Associated Press.

Smartmatic is also suing former Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani and Fox News and several of the cable TV network's hosts for statements they made in the aftermath of the 2020 election.

"Without any true villain, defendants invented one. Defendants decided to make Smartmatic the villain in their story," Smartmatic's says in at least on of the suits, according to NBC News.

Powell, in a recent motion, to dismiss the case, argued that she could not be sued in New York, where Smartmatic filed the suit against her, because he did not have sufficient contacts with the state.

She also argued that her appearances on Fox News do not give the state jurisdiction over her.

Powell also says her comments cannot be considered defamatory because the information she shared about the Smartmatic voting machines is "backed by sworn affidavits, expert reports, and other corroborating evidence."

She also argues the First Amendment protects her statements about Smartmatic because they are "political speech and were made in connection with active litigation."

"I stand by my statements about Smartmatic today," Powell said." I believe every allegation I have made about Smartmatic and the vulnerability of these machines is true. This case is meritless and should be thrown out entirely."
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Still no chain of custody records provided for scads of Georgia absentee ballots put in drop boxes

The Georgia Star News says it still hasn't received chain of custody documentation for many absentee vote by mail ballots placed in drop boxes during the 2020 presidential election.
Image
Polling place worker holding sticker in Georgia in June 2020

Polling place worker holding sticker in Georgia in June 2020
(Elijah Nouvelage/Getty Images)

By Alex Nitzberg
Updated: April 8, 2021 - 9:00pm

More than five months have elapsed since the 2020 presidential election, but officials in the Peach State have yet to produce chain of custody records for hundreds of thousands of absentee vote-by-mail ballots that were placed in drop boxes throughout the state.

The Georgia Star News reported that the Georgia Secretary of State's office has said that there were 1.3 million absentee vote-by-mail ballots cast in the contest. The outlet said that polling performed by John McLaughlin & Associates suggests that 600,000 of those ballots were placed in the drop boxes throughout the state.

"According to Georgia Election Code Emergency Rule 183-1-14-0.8-.14, promulgated by the Georgia State Election Board in July 2020, but not codified by the state legislature at the time as the Georgia Constitution requires, each of Georgia's 159 counties is responsible for documenting the transfer of every batch of absentee ballots picked up at drop boxes and delivered to the county election offices with ballot transfer forms. The forms are required to be signed and dated, with time of pick up by the collection team upon pick up, and then signed, dated, with time of delivery by the registrar or designee upon receipt and accepted," The Star News reported.

"We don't know how many absentee ballots arrived by mail versus drop box. The counties can tell you," a spokesperson for Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger told Breitbart in early December.

Then, during the period of December 7-11, The Star News issued Open Records requests to Georgia's 159 counties in an effort to procure copies of the ballot transfer documentation, but since doing so the outlet has only received chain of custody documentation from 59 counties. Based on the estimated 600,000 votes placed in drop boxes statewide, the outlet reports that it has yet to receive documentation for 355,918, or 59.3% of those 600,000 ballots.

The outlet noted that it's possible the numbers supplied by Fulton County may not be complete. It also said that 28 counties did not respond to the records requests and 71 counties either did not have drop boxes or stated that they would supply records if a processing fee is paid.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Pennsylvania agrees to remove names deceased from voter rolls, in lawsuit agreement

The state agreed to remove the names of deceased residents from voter rolls, using Social Security and voter registration data.
Image
Georgia polling station

Two men vote at a Cobb County voting location, Jan. 5, 2021
(Megan Varner/Getty Images)

By Nicholas Sherman
Updated: April 9, 2021 - 10:23am

Pennsylvania officials have agreed to remove the names of deceased people from active voter rolls as part of an agreement legal settlement with an election integrity watchdog group.

Public Interest Legal Foundation filed its civil action lawsuit against the former Pennsylvanian Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar and the state of Pennsylvania in November of 2020 claiming 21,000 decrease registrants were still on the voter rolls at the time of the 2020 presidential election, creating the potential for fraud and/or abuse, according to The Epoch Times.

"The Commonwealth’s failure to remove deceased registrants created a vast opportunity for voter fraud and abuse. It is important to not have dead voters active on the rolls for 5, 10, or even 20 years. This settlement fixes that," Public Interest Legal Foundation President and General Counsel J. Christian Adams said in a statement in announcing the court’s decision.

As part of the deal, Pennsylvania agrees to compare its voter registration database with the Social Security Death Index and then remove the names of dead registrants.

While the state has yet to announce how many deceased people are still on voter rolls, the foundation claimed to have found 9,212 of the alleged 21,000 dead voters to have been dead for more than five years and found another 2,000 who had been dead for more than 10 years, still on voter rolls.

"The Department of State is pleased that this agreement will offer Pennsylvania’s county boards of election another valuable tool to maintain the most accurate and up-to-date voter rolls possible," the department said in a statement.
However, the department still disputes the total number alleged by the foundation.

Former President Trump contested the results of the election in Pennsylvania during the 2020 presidential election, claimed he "won by a lot."
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
WIsconsin Supreme Court Rules Voters Can Stay on Voter Rolls Even After They Move
So residency is not a prerequisite for voting?

I should register to vote in Wisconsin.

And while I'm at it I should apply for welfare payments. If residency is not required to vote then it must not be required for assistance. Send the check care of Owner at Seacoast Cow Hampshire.

Now tax me and I might adopt another tact. Like what exactly do I get for my taxes when I'm in Cow Hampshire? And how can you impose a tax prius negotium? (before occupancy.)

Dobbin
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

GA SoS Raffensperger Amicus Brief Denying Election Fraud Doesn’t Hold Water, Is Riddled With Deceit

by CD Media StaffApril 9, 202103208
GA GOP Loses Its Religion Over Raffensperger Secretary Of State Office
GA SoS Brad Raffensperger
Image by Nydia Tisdale


It is now finally official! The adamant opposition by Georgia Secretary of State (SOS) Brad Raffensperger to election transparency is now a matter of public legal record and undisputed fact. Late last week Raffensperger filed an amicus brief on behalf of Fulton County claiming that petitioners in the case of Favorito v. Cooney have no right to look at Fulton Co. mail-in ballots that are likely counterfeit according to sworn affidavits from auditors at the November 14th -15th hand count audit.

To do this, Raffensperger had to solicit assistance from Attorney General (AG) Chris Carr. AG Carr is a Nathan Deal political appointee and former chief of staff to Johnny Isakson. He is light on legal experience but well-steeped in politics. Carr’s filing of the amicus brief is the latest event in a 15-year trend by Georgia Attorneys General to operate on the wrong side of the law. Since 2006, the Attorneys General have defended in court Georgia’s original unverifiable Direct Recording Electronic (DRE) voting system that was eventually banned as unconstitutional by a U.S. District Court in 2019.

The new Dominion QR coded voting system that Raffensperger purchased and Carr has chosen to defend is just as unverifiable to the voter. That new system may also be banned as unconstitutional in the ongoing Curling V. Raffensperger federal lawsuit. Ironically though, Carr claims he is “Defending all Georgians”, “Upholding the Constitution” and “Fighting injustice” on his web site.

Carr filed Raffensperger’s brief on Good Friday but there is nothing good about it. There are at least 7 areas of false or deceptive claims:
  • The brief falsely claims that Petitioners did not articulate legal justification to unseal the ballots while it totally ignores the most important point of relevant law that any court can unseal ballots for any reason under O.C.G.A. 21-2-500. If the controversies surrounding the Nov 3rd 2020 election do not justify reasons to unseal the ballots then what would?
  • The brief falsely portrays the lawsuit as only Open Records Request Act claims when in reality, most are Equal Protection and Due Process claims that justify unsealing of the ballots as part of discovery for evidence to adjudicate the claims;
  • The brief restates the off repeated false claims that there are overwhelming security and privacy issues involving the ballots. The ballots contain no voter identifiable information and will remain in the custody of Fulton Co. during the inspection according to the most recently filed inspection plan;
  • The brief falsely implies that recently signed Act 9 of the Georgia General Assembly, passed as SB202, prevents ballots from being unsealed. No such language exists as any reader can see by reviewing the bill language or our analysis of it in the sixth installment of our Georgia Election Integrity series. A recent Raffensperger press release claimed he “worked with the Georgia legislature to make sure ballot images could be made available to the public for review” when in reality, his Elections Director Chris Harvey and legal counsel Ryan Germany misled county elections directors in Emails by falsely claiming the AG office had issued an opinion that ballot images could not be made public;
  • The brief falsely attempts to use a 2007 Smith V. Dekalb case as precedent for ballot images when that case referenced the old DRE voting system that never produced paper ballot images.
  • The brief falsely states that lawsuit contains “baseless” claims when the claims are actually based on four sworn affidavits from seasoned poll managers stating they handled counterfeit ballots during the November 14th and 15th hand count audit
  • The brief falsely states that there was no unlawful activity at the State Farm Area when mail-in ballots were processed during the night of November 3rd and 4th 2020. The video shows a curved room that impaired monitor visibility, ballots being hidden under skirted tables, the same ballots being scanned more than once and scanning re-initiated after an announcement was made that scanning would stop for the night according to two sworn affidavits. All of these activities and conditions are violations of Georgia laws contrary to voting system implementation manager Gabriel Sterling who claimed it was “normal ballot processing” (O.C.G.A. 21-2-406, 21-2-483(b) 2-2-492, 21-2-493)
Felonies Really?
But the most bizarre claim in the brief is the claim that anyone participating in a court ordered ballot inspection may be guilty of a felony under O.C.G.A. 21-2-574. This code section reads:

“Any person other than an officer charged by law with the care of ballots or a person entrusted by any such officer with the care of the same for a purpose required by law, who has in his or her possession outside the polling place any official ballot shall be guilty of a felony”

This law applies to the course of an election and certainly has no bearing on a court-ordered inspection. Furthermore, inspectors never take possession of the ballots since the inspection would be conducted under the custody of Fulton County as the plan states.

If court ordered ballot inspectors could be felons then…

If what Carr and Raffensperger attempt to claim is true then Raffensperger would be guilty of 100 counts of criminal solicitation for allowing all those Georgians to handle ballots while they participated as auditors in the November 2020 hand count audit that the he authorized.

Conclusion

Although the new amicus brief contains wildly false assertions, it not the first time that the Secretary of State or members of his office have published false information. A deeper analysis of historical VoterGA press releases and presentations reveals that Elections Director Chris Harvey, Legal Counsel Ryan Germany, Voting Systems Manager Gabriel Sterling, Assistant Secretary Jordan Fuchs, Inspector General Francis Watson and Chief Information Officer Merritt Beaver have also provided false information to legislators, elections officials, the media, or the general public. That is in part why U.S. District Court Judge Amy Totenberg found the office as “not credible” in the recent Curling v. Raffensperger lawsuit. More to come in future Georgia Election Integrity series articles.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Report: H.R. 1 Would Gut Most States’ Voter Integrity Laws, Mandate Drastic Changes to Their Election Systems
By Craig Bannister | April 9, 2021 | 12:08pm EDT

VoteCountingGettyChetStrange.jpg

(Getty Images/Chet Strange)

Nearly three-fourths of U.S. states have some form of voter identification requirement that would be abolished, if Democrats’ “For the People Act” (H.R. 1) bill becomes law, a new study by the Honest Elections Project (HEP) warns.

H.R. 1 would negate a range of state laws designed to ensure that only legal votes are counted and that political operatives don’t harass voters trying to cast their ballots, “H.R. 1’s Impacts on Election Safeguards and Voting Practices” explains:
  • 36 states have adopted a voter identification requirement, which H.R. 1 would prohibit them from applying.
  • 24 states either limit or ban operatives, campaigns, candidates, and activists from interacting with voters as they cast an absentee ballot or taking unsupervised possession of their voted ballots. H.R. 1 would remove these restrictions.
  • 12 states require that absentee ballots be signed by a witness, or that voters comply with an ID requirement when they vote absentee. Both practices are prohibited by the bill.
Additionally, H.R. 1 would create hurdles to states’ efforts to keep voter rolls accurate. It hinders cleanup efforts and allows records to become inflated with outdated registrations, the report cautions.

H.R. 1 would even eliminate election integrity laws currently in force in a number of “blue” states (those with Democratic governors or legislatures):
  • Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Rhode Island, Virginia, and Washington all have voter ID laws that would be overturned by H.R. 1.
  • Vote trafficking would no longer be restricted in a number of “blue” states, such as New Jersey and New Mexico, under H.R. 1.
  • Connecticut and New York do not regularly offer no-excuse absentee voting, but would be required to do so by H.R. 2.
  • Delaware offers neither automatic nor same-day voter registration. New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, and Virginia also do not allow same-day registration. H.R. 1 would ban these limitations on registration.
Within months of enactment, H.R. 1 would require many states to implement drastic changes to their election systems and infrastructure, such as:
  • 14 states will need to develop policies, procedures, and logistics to allow no-excuse absentee voting.
  • 36 states that offer no-excuse absentee or all-mail voting would need to conform their practices to H.R. 1’s myriad commands.
  • 30 states would be forced to create Automatic Voter Registration (AVR) systems for the first time.
  • 19 states currently use AVR, but as with absentee balloting, many of these systems would be forced to institute potentially sweeping changes to bring them into compliance with H.R. 1.
  • 29 states would need to develop same-day voter registration processes.
  • 36 states would have to develop and launch redistricting commissions to handle legislative redistricting.
In conclusion, the report warns that H.R. 1 would “permanently reshape elections in ways that weaken voting safeguards, put public trust in elections at risk, and ignore the desires of mainstream voters.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Mainstream media murders the truth in rush to destroy new Georgia election law


FILE - In this Nov. 3, 2020, file photo, a poll worker talks to a voter before they vote on a paper ballot on Election Day in Atlanta. The sweeping rewrite of Georgia’s election rules that was signed into law

By Newt Gingrich - - Thursday, April 8, 2021

ANALYSIS/OPINION:
The only thing more infuriating than Major League Baseball’s unprecedented decision to punish Georgians over their state’s recent election law has been the national media’s dedication to lying about what the law says and does.

Since the bill was signed by Gov. Brian Kemp on March 25, we have heard from media how the bill would supposedly outlaw providing food and water to people standing in line to vote. As Democratic Strategist James Carville told “11th Hour” host Brian Williams (with no pushback), “It is going to be illegal to give somebody that’s standing in line to vote. I have never heard of water being an illegal substance in the United States.”

This particular lie has been spread by the president of the United States himself (again with no scrutiny from media). On March 26, President Biden told media before boarding Marine One:

“It’s an atrocity. The idea — if you want any indication that it has nothing to do with fairness, nothing to do with decency — they passed a law saying you can’t provide water for people standing in line while they’re waiting to vote. You don’t need anything else to know that this is nothing but punitive design to keep people from voting. You can’t provide water for people about to vote? Give me a break.”

First, the part of the law in question primarily prohibits third parties from electioneering or attempting to persuade voters within 150 feet of a polling building, within said building, or within 25 feet of anyone standing in line. This was already on the books — and is common practice in many states.
California, Illinois and New York all prohibit electioneering within 100 feet of a polling place, for example. The new law in Georgia added a prohibition against giving waiting voters anything of value, including food or water within that area.

Now, the law does nothing to keep third parties from supplying food or water to people outside the proscribed area. Importantly, what the media seems to be universally ignoring — or lying about — is the law expressly allows poll workers to provide water to people in line. The argument that this provision hinders anyone from voting is pure propaganda.

The Washington Post has also claimed Georgia’s voting law is “one of the most controversial because critics say it is likely to disproportionately affect Black voters.” The basis for this claim is the law’s requirement that absentee voters must provide proof of identification. The old law only required that signatures from ballot envelopes be subjectively verified. The media propagandists claim it is harder for Black voters to get IDs, and therefore it will be harder for them to vote absentee.

Now, 75 percent of Americans support identification requirements for voting, according to a recent Rasmussen Reports poll. Other surveys from McLaughlin & Associates have found more than 80% of voters favor voter ID laws.

Wide approval of voter ID laws aside, the Georgia law simply will not keep Black voters from voting. Any assertion otherwise is a blatant lie. If a voter does not have a driver’s license, he or she can provide the number to a state-issued voting identification card (which are free in Georgia). Still, if the voter doesn’t have that, he or she can provide the last four digits of his or her Social Security number.

These are only two of the ways the left-wing media and Democrats are lying about Georgia’s new election law. I go into further detail on Wednesday’s episode of my Newt’s World podcast.

The truth is: Georgia’s new election law has expanded opportunities to vote in that state. The law standardized the use of secure voting drop boxes (they were only allowed in emergencies under prior law). It expanded early voting (both in days and hours) — including mandatory weekend voting for people who work weekday hours (contrary to the lies Mr. Biden has been repeating).

Simply put: Georgia’s new election law has made it easier to vote – but harder to cheat. That fact explains why Democrats hate it so much.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

HUGE NEWS: Attorney Matthew DePerno Releases Michigan Elections Forensics Report – 66,194 Unregistered Ballots Tallied in JUST 9 COUNTIES

By Jim Hoft
Published April 9, 2021 at 6:10pm
DePerno.jpg


Michigan Constitutional Attorney Matthew Deperno released his much anticipated Michigan Elections Forensics Report on Friday.

Among the findings:
• Modem Chipsets Installed In Voting System Motherboards
• 66,194 unregistered ballots tallied in just 9 counties.
66,194 ballot voter IDs not found in October registration database.

deperno-66194.jpg


Much more to come…

Here’s the link to Matthew DePerno’s findings.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Progressive Groups Pretending to be Non-Partisan Launch Intimidation Campaign in Arizona to Stop Proposed Voter ID Law that Will Cut Down on Cheating

By Jim Hoft
Published April 9, 2021 at 4:34pm

This is part of a national intimidation campaign by the left to stop State legislation that would prevent voter fraud.

The non-profit Progress Arizona has been putting doorknob hangers on Arizona homes to stop SB1713.

This new AZ bill requires voters to include ID with early mail-in ballots. It includes nearly a dozen ways to comply. The hanger front says “I Love PEVL”.

Some laughingly say this stands for “Progressives are EVIL”. But it actually stands for “Permanent Early Voting List”. This 2007 AZ law allows voters to be on a list to permanently receive mail-in ballots. The Democrat messaging is that SB1713 reverses the 2007 (PEVL) law.

pevl-az-vote.jpg


In addition to ground and social media campaigns aimed at voters, Progress Arizona is pressuring businesses too. They currently target corporations who supported BLM by throwing that past support back in their face. Their message to these corporations is essentially this: Since you supported BLM and said you were against systemic racism, then you must publicly oppose Republican voter fraud bills because they are attacking communities of color. You must also stop all donations to any Republicans involved. Progress Arizona was one of 30 organizations that signed intimidation letters sent to executives at Allstate Insurance, CVS, Enterprise Rent-A-Car, Farmers’ Insurance, and so on.

The backside of the hanger contains propaganda to scare citizens: “SB1713 creates barriers for all voters, especially people of color” and so on. But it also has a very tiny “Allied Printing Trades Council” logo at the bottom. Only two printing shops in all of AZ are licensed to use this logo because their employees are members of the Printing & Publishing union (PPMWS), which is affiliated with the AFL-CIO. Hmm!

label-az-priting.jpg

Progress Arizona claims to be a 501(c)4 and their sister organization, Progress Arizona Institute, is a 501(c)(3). However, there is no record of either in several non-profit search tools (IRS.gov, Guidestar, Melissa). They do have a solid presence on social media and a YouTube channel started in January 2021.

Progress Arizona promotes messaging from CAIR and seems closely connected to Instituto. This non-profit Instituto was founded by Luis Avila. He was born and raised in Sinaloa, Mexico and then moved to America to attend Arizona State University.

Avila was a Field Organizer for Obama and then Organizing Director for Hillary’s campaign. He has an extensive and impressive background having worked for and associated with many left leaning organizations. Avila has been an instructor and speaker at ASU, a CNN correspondent, and is Vice Chairman of the Board for UnidosUS (formerly LaRaza). He is the founder (2015) and current President of Iconico Campaigns in Phoenix, a marketing company that appears exclusively for liberal causes.

Jennifer Guzman, a former ASU student, is the Legislative Communications Director for Progress Arizona. She was recently accepted to Instituto’s Monzon Fellowship program. Instituto provides managerial type campaign training to those who work in organizations that advance leftist causes. Progress Arizona’s current stream of propaganda is promoting HR1 and has extensive attacks aimed at Senator Sinema for not supporting removal of the filibuster. Jennifer is also a former employee of Iconico.

guzman-leftie-az.jpg


Those who provide information to the Progress Arizona website should be warned. The links for their “Terms of Use” and “Privacy Policy” take you to Latin gibberish text. This is generic placeholder content found on brand new websites. Without stated policies they can do whatever they want with any personal information gathered by subscribing or cookies placed on the devices of site visitors.

As usual, it’s hard to decipher the spider web of non profits that push Democrat causes. They all use the same buzzwords: adversity, advocacy, communities of color, social justice, etc. Some push leftist agendas because they have been indoctrinated. Others seem to just be chasing the endless cash provided by the lefts donors. Either way, they are tearing our country apart. The GOP still does not have an effective solution to getting the truth to “communities of color” on regular basis.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

The Democrats Are Totally Abusing Nonprofit Vehicles – Use Them in Efforts to Steal the 2020 Election
By Joe Hoft

Published April 9, 2021 at 4:01pm

Political-Parties-Medium-1-600x467.jpg

The Democrats are making a mockery of the non-profit industry. They label their political entities as nonprofits so they can give their billionaire supporters tax deductions while they push liberal communist policies.


The Democrats’ favorite attorney Mark Elias’ favorite hammer is a nonprofit.

Currently, he is working with Democrat nonprofit “Protect Democracy Project,” a 501(c)(3) charity, which is required by law, more so than other types of nonprofits, to remain strictly nonpartisan. (This act doesn’t look non-partisan.)

But by working with Elias this group is clearly not non-partisan. We wrote about this yesterday:
Perkins Coie and Marc Elias, Hillary Clinton’s consigliere, were, responsible for the fabricated and discredited Steele Dossier which was a vicious, partisan attempt by the Democrats to remove Republican President Donald Trump from office.

The Protect Democracy Project (PDP) nonprofit, which is in reality functioning as a weaponized, political tool of the Democrats, sicced not one, not two, but three law firms on the Arizona Senate’s audit teams: Perkins Coie and two Arizona firms, Coppersmith Brockelman, and Barton Mendez Soto. With a hefty $12.4 million in revenue as of 2019 and a whopping 72 staff members, many of whom are attorneys, the PDP is a rich and powerful nonprofit and can afford to engage the legal muscle needed to enforce the Democrat billionaire’s will.

We’ve reported on how the PDP is tied to Soros, China, Obama, and Biden as well:
This charity effectively provides Perkins Coie with the one-off camo and the appearance of do-gooders doing good necessary so that it can actually execute the raw will of the national Democratic machine, without appearing to do so.

Never mind the will of the people of Arizona and their state Senate and never mind IRS rules which require this type of NFP – a (c)(3) – to never, ever take political sides. Perkins Coie and its nonprofit lapdog have a mission to stop the Maricopa County audit and laws, rules, and the will of the Arizona people are simply in their way.

This nonprofit’s actions are an attempt to interfere in the process of securing an honest, accurate, and trustworthy ballot audit and its interference favor of the Democratic Party. That’s anything but nonpartisan nonprofit activity!

As expected, the day the letter was released, on April 6, 2021, Marc Elias’s website, Democracy Docket LLC, issued a statement about it. It revealed that even more threats and more nonprofit and legal muscle will be coming down the pike if the Arizona Senate does not back down:
Multiple voting rights lawyers and advocacy groups have signed a letter outlining their intention to sue if the unfounded Republican-led audit of Maricopa County’s election results goes forward with their planned intimidation tactics…
Who is Marc Elias? Why does his name always appear whenever there are Democrat elections which need fixing? A partner at the powerful Perkins Coie law firm, he is the head of its political law practice, which assists Democratic political committees and candidates (e.g., Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, the DNC, House & Senate Majority PACs). Influence Watch states that:
Following the November 2018 mid-term election, Elias and the Perkins-Coie political law group will have as clients all but three of the Democratic U.S. Senators, and 100 Democratic members of the U.S. House of Representatives.

Furthermore, billionaire George Soros money follows where Marc Elias goes. In 2016, Soros gave $5 million to Elias and his firm to challenge photo ID requirements at polling places. When Elias joined the board of Priorities USA in 2017, which has similar “election integrity” goals (and, naturally, a related nonprofit, Priorities USA Action), Soros, in 2018, donated $5 million to its super PAC.
We wrote after the election about Democrat nonprofits that were used to steal the election in Georgia:
The Democrats’ use and abuse of the nonprofit sector should be addressed and would be if Republicans were awake and the Justice System was just.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Email
Biden Defense Secretary Orders Several “Immediate Actions” to Weed Out ‘Extremism’ in the Ranks
By Cristina Laila
Published April 9, 2021 at 7:46pm
1618032362379.png
Lloyd Austin

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin on Friday signed a memo ordering several “immediate actions” to weed out so-called ‘extremism’ in the ranks.

Austin signed this memo after he ordered military-wide “stand downs” to “address white nationalism” and rid the military of “extremists and racists.”
“The vast majority of those who serve in uniform and their civilian colleagues do so with great honor and integrity, but any extremist behavior in the force can have an outsized impact,” Austin wrote.

Austin outlined a series of actions the department will take to get rid of extremism:
  • Review and update the DoD’s definition of extremism.
  • Update servicemember checklists to include “training on potential targeting of service members by extremist groups and work with other federal departments agencies to create a mechanism by which veterans have the opportunity to report any potential contact with an extremist group should they chose to do so.”
  • Review and standardization of screening questionnaire: “To solicit specific information about current or previous extremist behavior. 1) To gather actionable information in the short term to ensure that only the best qualified recruits are selected for services, and 2) to clarify that any demonstrably false answers provided in response could form the basis for punitive action for fraudulent enlistment.”
  • Commission an Extremism Study: “The Department will commission a study on extremist behavior within our Total Force, to include gaining greater fidelity on the scope of the problem.”
Defense officials last Wednesday said the Pentagon is reversing Trump-era policies that banned transgender people from serving in the military.

The Pentagon will also issue new rules that will broaden transgender people’s access to medical care and gender transition surgery.

How does any of Lloyd Austin’s actions increase our military’s combat readiness?
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

How H.R.1 intends to overturn Supreme Court rulings on elections

BY ROBERT POPPER, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR — 03/24/21 10:15 AM EDT 706
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED BY CONTRIBUTORS ARE THEIR OWN AND NOT THE VIEW OF THE HILL

How H.R.1 intends to overturn Supreme Court rulings on elections

© Getty Images

Ever since House Resolution 1, the Democrats’ 886-page partisan wish list of a voting bill, passed the House on a party-line vote earlier this month, its critics have had a lot to say. They correctly point out that the bill federalizes election law on a historically unprecedented scale, systematically impairs existing federal and state laws concerning election integrity, and imposes new burdens and restrictions on political speech and activity. All of this is apparent from the text of the bill.

Less obvious — indeed, almost hidden from anyone who does not specialize in voting law — is a provision of H.R. 1 requiring states to draw federal congressional districts in a way that favors Democrats: “Districts shall comply with the Voting Rights Act … including by creating any districts where two or more politically cohesive groups protected by such Act are able to elect representatives of choice in coalition with one another.” The bill adds that districts must “ensure the practical ability” of such groups to “elect representatives of choice … regardless of whether or not such protected group constitutes a majority” of a district.

“In coalition with one another” — these innocent-seeming words are, in fact, an attempt to reverse particular rulings of the Supreme Court and compel the drawing of what are known as “coalition” districts specially constructed to ensure Democratic majorities.

The checkered history of coalition districts is bound up with cases interpreting Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which forbids any practice that causes members of a racial group to “have less opportunity than other members of the electorate to participate in the political process and to elect representatives of their choice.” This clause has long been interpreted to forbid at-large elections where these allow a racial majority to dominate a racial minority.

Here is how this might happen: In an at-large election for, say, a city council of seven members, every member is elected by the entire population of the city; if voting is racially polarized, a racial majority of only 55 percent of the city’s voters has the power to elect all seven council members, effectively denying the large minority any representation whatsoever. The remedy for this kind of violation of Section 2 is the imposition of electoral districts. These allow the city-wide minority a chance to prevail locally in at least a few of those districts. But before compelling such a remedy — that is, before throwing out a jurisdiction’s chosen electoral system and imposing a district plan — the Supreme Court logically requires that a racial minority at least have a chance of forming a majority in one of the new districts.

In the intervening years, the plaintiffs suing to enforce Section 2 have most often been Black or Hispanic voters. In any particular jurisdiction, they may not have sufficient numbers to make up a majority in a new district. Further, many of these voters tend to vote for Democrats, and the requirement that they be placed in districts where they can form a majority often conflicts with the desire of Democratic operatives that they be placed strategically to maximize the party’s electoral chances.

Enter the concept of coalition districts. Suppose there are too few black voters to form a majority in a new district. The idea is that, if enough white voters join them, or if enough Hispanic or other minority voters join them, and if this “coalition” is large enough to constitute a voting majority in that district, then drawing it becomes legally necessary to ensure minority voters’ opportunity “to elect representatives of their choice.”

This is a transparent partisan trick. What special interest do minority voters in such a district share with other minority or majority voters who may join them to form a majority? The only answer is that they all intend to vote the same way.

Indeed, drawing such a coalition district seems to reduce to a mandate to “find as many Democrats as you can and put them in a district.” An ideological preference cannot be enshrined as a voting right. As Richard Pildes put it in 2002, a “statute aimed at counteracting discrimination in voting would thus be transformed into a substantive, partisan entitlement to office.”

In Bartlett v. Strickland in 2009, the Supreme Court rejected the idea that white votes could be combined with Black votes to constitute a majority in a Section 2 remedial district. As Justice Kennedy observed, Section 2 does not grant “special protection to a minority group’s right to form political coalitions.” And in Perry v. Perez in 2012, the court implied that the same reasoning would bar the drawing of a “minority coalition opportunity district” in which “two different minority groups” were expected “to band together to form an electoral majority.”

Now, H.R. 1 seeks to revive this bad idea and to make it federal law. Like so much else in the bill, it is sure to be subject to legal challenges — in this case, for blatantly favoring the electoral prospects of one party and one viewpoint.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

EXPLOSIVE: Investigators for Attorney DePerno Reportedly Discover Modem Chips Embedded in Michigan Voting System Computer Motherboards

By Jim Hoft
Published April 10, 2021 at 7:30am

Friday’s release by Attorney Matthew DePerno on his ongoing election fraud investigation was explosive.

For months the companies behind the computer voting systems claimed their computers did not have internet access.

In his report that was filed in Michigan court, DePerno revealed that the ES&S DS200 voting machines contain a Telit LE910-SV1 Modem Chip installed on its motherboard.


SEE Exhibit 6 in Antrim County Lawsuit

According to Patrick Colbeck at Let’s Fix Stuff the chip utilized a commercial Verizon SIM card with an Access Point Name (APN) configuration specific to the ES&S DS200 provisioning.

esss-ds200-chip.jpg

ESS DS200 Motherboard with Telit LE910-SV1 Modem Chip

teli-le910.jpg

According to former Senator Patrick Colbeck

What does the Telit LE910-SV1 Modem Chip do?
  • Enable communication between voting system equipment and election servers
  • Designed to operate on a virtual private network
  • Testing has revealed that the same SIM card could be used in a separate wireless hotspot device. This device could then join the same APN as the ES&S voting machines.
Patrick Colbeck has more on this significant discovery here.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Here We Go: New Hampshire Governor Will Sign Bill For Voting Machine Audit

By ProTrumpNews Staff
Published April 10, 2021 at 11:00am
F1E545D1-1096-4AAD-A699-20FFD075018A.jpeg

A voting machine audit is coming!

On April 8th, the New Hampshire Senate passed a bill to mandate an audit of the Windham, New Hampshire election results.

All that remains for the audit to take place is a signature from the Governor.
At a press conference, New Hampshire Governor Chris Sununu (R) says he will sign the bill.

The Washington Examiner reported:
The governor of New Hampshire announced on Thursday that he intends to sign a bill allowing an audit of voting machines used in the town of Windham for the 2020 election.
Advertisement - story continues below

Gov. Chris Sununu said he supported the bill, which is meant to address count discrepancies there, during a press conference on Thursday.
“I think they designed the bill very well,” he said. “And I fully intend on signing it and moving that forward as soon as we can.”
A hand recount in Windham found that machines shorted every Republican candidate 6% of their total votes.

Each GOP candidate lost nearly 300 votes.

Republicans flipped the New Hampshire House and Senate in the 2020 election — yet somehow Donald Trump lost the state.

Previously, witnesses told Gateway Pundit what happened in Windham:
The truth is coming!
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

What Is Michigan’s Secretary of State Benson Hiding? Why Is She Not Complying with Subpoenas and Delaying Producing Elections Material Requested?

By Joe Hoft
Published April 10, 2021 at 11:45am
benson-600x294.jpg

Last night Attorney Matt DePerno released a number of documents related to his work in Michigan. In his documentation, he addresses the fact that the Michigan Secretary of State is attempting to run out the clock on discovery.

Last night, attorney Mathew DePerno from Michigan released some damning documents related to his work in Antrim Country:

HUGE NEWS: Attorney Matthew DePerno Releases Michigan Elections Forensics Report – 66,194 Unregistered Ballots Tallied in JUST 9 COUNTIES

In one document (Collective Response To Motions for Protective Order 040921), Deperno discusses the actions of Michigan’s Secretary of State, Jocelyn Benson. We recently reported on George Soros backed Benson’s decision not to speak in front of Michigan’s Senate about the election:

Michigan’s Soros-Connected Secretary of State Refuses to Testify Before Michigan Senate on the State’s Election Audit Process

In Deperno’s report on page five, Deperno notes the following about Benson:
Advertisement - story continues below

Deperno-Benson.jpg


Why is the Secretary of State of one of the largest states in the Union trying to obfuscate and delay the work of good people who want to get to the truth behind the 2020 election in her state. She must be hiding something.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Georgia Secretary of State Raffensperger’s Amicus Brief Attempting to Prevent an Independent Audit in the State’s 2020 Election Results Includes At Least Seven False Accusations

By Joe Hoft
Published April 10, 2021 at 2:40pm
raffensperger-dirty.jpg

Last week we reported that Georgia’s creepy Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger had petitioned the court to request that the state of Georgia not have to provide paper ballots in an audit requested and awarded by the court.
Yesterday, creative destruction media, listed seven instances in Raffensperger’s letter that are just plain false:
  1. The brief falsely claims that Petitioners did not articulate legal justification to unseal the ballots while it totally ignores the most important point of relevant law that any court can unseal ballots for any reason under O.C.G.A. 21-2-500. If the controversies surrounding the Nov 3rd 2020 election do not justify reasons to unseal the ballots then what would?
  2. The brief falsely portrays the lawsuit as only Open Records Request Act claims when in reality, most are Equal Protection and Due Process claims that justify unsealing of the ballots as part of discovery for evidence to adjudicate the claims;
  3. The brief restates the off repeated false claims that there are overwhelming security and privacy issues involving the ballots. The ballots contain no voter identifiable information and will remain in the custody of Fulton Co. during the inspection according to the most recently filed inspection plan;
  4. The brief falsely implies that recently signed Act 9 of the Georgia General Assembly, passed as SB202, prevents ballots from being unsealed. No such language exists as any reader can see by reviewing the bill language or our analysis of it in the sixth installment of our Georgia Election Integrity series. A recent Raffensperger press release claimed he “worked with the Georgia legislature to make sure ballot images could be made available to the public for review” when in reality, his Elections Director Chris Harvey and legal counsel Ryan Germany misled county elections directors in Emails by falsely claiming the AG office had issued an opinion that ballot images could not be made public;
  5. The brief falsely attempts to use a 2007 Smith V. Dekalb case as precedent for ballot images when that case referenced the old DRE voting system that never produced paper ballot images.
  6. The brief falsely states that lawsuit contains “baseless” claims when the claims are actually based on four sworn affidavits from seasoned poll managers stating they handled counterfeit ballots during the November 14th and 15th hand count audit
  7. The brief falsely states that there was no unlawful activity at the State Farm Area when mail-in ballots were processed during the night of November 3rd and 4th 2020. The video shows a curved room that impaired monitor visibility, ballots being hidden under skirted tables, the same ballots being scanned more than once and scanning re-initiated after an announcement was made that scanning would stop for the night according to two sworn affidavits. All of these activities and conditions are violations of Georgia laws contrary to voting system implementation manager Gabriel Sterling who claimed it was “normal ballot processing” (O.C.G.A. 21-2-406, 21-2-483(b) 2-2-492, 21-2-493)
What is Raffensperger so scared about that he would intentionally disregard the truth in his letter to the court?
 

What Is Michigan’s Secretary of State Benson Hiding? Why Is She Not Complying with Subpoenas and Delaying Producing Elections Material Requested?

By Joe Hoft
Published April 10, 2021 at 11:45am
benson-600x294.jpg

Last night Attorney Matt DePerno released a number of documents related to his work in Michigan. In his documentation, he addresses the fact that the Michigan Secretary of State is attempting to run out the clock on discovery.

Last night, attorney Mathew DePerno from Michigan released some damning documents related to his work in Antrim Country:

HUGE NEWS: Attorney Matthew DePerno Releases Michigan Elections Forensics Report – 66,194 Unregistered Ballots Tallied in JUST 9 COUNTIES

In one document (Collective Response To Motions for Protective Order 040921), Deperno discusses the actions of Michigan’s Secretary of State, Jocelyn Benson. We recently reported on George Soros backed Benson’s decision not to speak in front of Michigan’s Senate about the election:

Michigan’s Soros-Connected Secretary of State Refuses to Testify Before Michigan Senate on the State’s Election Audit Process

In Deperno’s report on page five, Deperno notes the following about Benson:
Advertisement - story continues below

Deperno-Benson.jpg


Why is the Secretary of State of one of the largest states in the Union trying to obfuscate and delay the work of good people who want to get to the truth behind the 2020 election in her state. She must be hiding something.

All that needs to be done is to SWAT Michigan’s Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson's house at 0-dark thirty, coming in from both sides of her abode, unannounced, and detaining her handcuffed in her underwear, on her front lawn, while the media cameras roll, live.

Was "good enough" for Roger Stone and family, why not this communist miscreant?


intothegoodnight
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Pennsylvania Agrees to Remove Names of Dead Citizens From Voter Rolls: Settlement

April 8, 2021 11:46, Last Updated: April 8, 2021 16:28
By Jack Phillips

The state of Pennsylvania agreed to remove the names of deceased people from voter rolls, an election-integrity watchdog group announced after reaching a settlement with state officials.

The lawsuit, (pdf) which was filed by the Public Interest Legal Foundation in November 2020, alleged that some 21,000 registrants who had died were still on the state’s voter rolls at the time of the 2020 presidential election. Pennsylvania agreed to compare its voter-registration database with the Social Security Death Index, and then direct all county election commissions to remove the names of dead registrants.

“This marks an important victory for the integrity of elections in Pennsylvania,” Public Interest Legal Foundation President and General Counsel J. Christian Adams said in a statement in announcing the court’s decision. “The Commonwealth’s failure to remove deceased registrants created a vast opportunity for voter fraud and abuse. It is important to not have dead voters active on the rolls for 5, 10, or even 20 years. This settlement fixes that.”

The lawsuit was filed after the Nov. 3 election and when then-candidate Joe Biden took a lead over President Donald Trump in Pennsylvania. Ultimately, the Pennsylvania Secretary of Commonwealth’s office certified the election.

The foundation said it found that 9,212 of the 21,000 voters had been dead for more than five years, and nearly 2,000 voters had been dead for more than 10 years.

The settlement stipulates that the “Department of State shall transmit to each county commission the names of the individuals registered in each respective county identified as deceased as a result of the comparison undertaken” with the “death data set received” from Electronic Registration Information Center that was then “compared to the full voter registration database … for the purpose of identifying persons who are ineligible to vote by reason of the registrant’s death.”

In response, the Pennsylvania Department of State, which didn’t agree in the settlement with the number of dead voters alleged, said the agreement to remove the voters “includes no finding of inadequacy on the part of Pennsylvania and its counties,” according to the Washington Times. Officials didn’t immediately respond to a request by The Epoch Times for comment.

“The Department of State is pleased that this agreement will offer Pennsylvania’s county boards of election another valuable tool to maintain the most accurate and up-to-date voter rolls possible,” the department added in a statement.

The Department of State also agreed to pay $7,500 to the foundation to partially cover attorneys fees and other related costs.

The case was originally filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania with the case number No. 1:20-cv-01905.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Pentagon documents help complete Jan. 6 riot timeline, detail Pence's plea for help, report
Vice President Mike Pence demanded then-acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller to "clear the capitol," according to the AP report.

By Joseph Weber
Updated: April 10, 2021 - 3:21pm

A previously undisclosed document prepared by the Pentagon shows a more complete timeline of events during the Jan. 6 riot in Washington and what top U.S. leaders including then-Vice President Mike Pence were doing from inside the Capitol Building to stop the breach, according to a news report Saturday.

Pence demanded then-acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller "clear the capitol," according to the internal-use document, obtained by the Associated Press and vetted by current and former government officials.

As Pence was attempting to assert control, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi were elsewhere in the building making a similar pleas to military leaders, including asking the Army to deploy the National Guard.

Meanwhile, rioters, including many coming from a pro-Trump rally on the Ellipse, began arriving at the Capitol at about 1:30 p.m. – breaking through police lines and into the Senate side of the Capitol, according to the review of the document.
At the Pentagon, officials were discussing reports that the chaos was also occurring in state capitals across the country.

“We must establish order,” Gen. Mark Milley, then-chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said in a call with Pentagon leaders, the wire service also reports.
President Trump at 4:19 p.m. tweeted for those inside the Capitol to "go home and go in peace."

However, order was not restored until hours late.

Almost exactly an hour after Trump’s tweet, the first group of 155 Guard members, dressed in tactical gear, began arriving.

The Capitol was declared secure by 8 p.m., and the Senate resumed its certification of state Electoral College votes declaring Democrat Joe Biden the winner of the 2020 presidential election.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

AZ Gov. Ducey Signs Bill into Law that Prohibits Private Funding of Election Administration
3,557
WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 23: With an image of himself on a screen in the background, Facebook co-founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg testifies before the House Financial Services Committee in the Rayburn House Office Building on Capitol Hill October 23, 2019 in Washington, DC. Zuckerberg testified about Facebook's proposed cryptocurrency …
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
MICHAEL PATRICK LEAHY10 Apr 2021200

Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey signed a bill into law on Friday that prohibits the private funding of election administration in the state.

Arizona is now the first state in the country that specifically prohibits the controversial private funding of election administration that was introduced to the American political process in the 2020 presidential election, when Facebook CEO and founder Mark Zuckerberg contributed $419 million to two non-profit groups that in turn funded state, county, and local election administration, which critics say benefited Democrats unfairly.

“With public confidence in our elections in peril, it’s clear our elections must be pristine and above reproach — and the sole purview of government,” the Associated Press reported Ducey wrote in a letter expressing his reasons for signing the bill into law.

The bill, HB 2569, passed the Arizona House of Representatives in a straight party-line vote, 31 to 29, in March. Last week, it passed the Arizona State Senate, also in a straight party-line vote, 16 to 14.

Heritage Action Executive Director Jessica Anderson praised Gov. Ducey, a Republican, for signing the bill into law in a statement released late Friday:
Gov. Doug Ducey stood up for all Arizonans by taking swift action and signing this historic election integrity law. HB 2569 is another in a series of strong measures Arizona lawmakers have taken to protect election integrity and keep the influence of private money out of Arizona’s election system operations. Arizonans deserve an election process free from outside influence and partisan funding — by banning corporate and private funding for election operations, this law will safeguard that system.
State Rep. Jake Hoffman and the grassroots activists of Arizona worked hard to advance HB 2569 and other common-sense legislation to ensure Arizona’s elections are fair and transparent. As Arizona legislators continue working to pass further election integrity legislation, they should do so with the knowledge that they are supported by the people of Arizona.
The Associated Press reported that Arizona Democrats blamed underfunding by Republicans for Zuckerberg’s private funding of election administration in the state in 2020:
“It’s easy to make a boogeyman ou[t] of billionaires. I don’t like them either. But we put ourselves in this situation,” Sen. Juan Mendez, a Tempe Democrat, said of the Legislature’s budgeting decisions. “Our elections are so underfunded we’ve got counites out there asking for money to do voter outreach.”
Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs used $4.8 million from the Center for Election Innovation and Research for an advertising campaign telling voters when and how to vote, encourage signup for the permanent early voting list, recruit poll workers and combat misinformation before and after the election.
Arizona Secretary of State Hobbs, a Democrat, was one of the state election officials in 23 states who accepted monies from the Zuckerberg-funded Center for Election Innovation and Research (CEIR), as Breitbart News reported in November. The Secretary of State in eight of those states was a Republican, including Georgia, where Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger accepted a “large grant” from CEIR.

As Breitbart News reported in December:
A report released by the Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society at a press conference on Wednesday alleged Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife made $419.5 million in contributions to non-profit organizations during the 2020 election cycle–$350 million to the “Safe Elections” Project of the Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL) and another $69.5 million to the Center for Election Innovation and Research–that, “improperly influence[d] the 2020 presidential election on behalf of one particular candidate and party.”
“The 2020 presidential election witnessed an unprecedented and coordinated public-private partnership to improperly influence the 2020 presidential election on behalf of one particular candidate and party. Funded by hundreds of millions of dollars from Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and other high-tech interests, activist organizations created a two-tiered election system that treated voters differently depending on whether they lived in Democrat or Republican strongholds,” Amistad Project Director Phill Kline wrote in the report’s executive summary.
According to a report released by the Foundation for Government Accountability in March, the CTCL spent more than $5 million in grants for election administration in nine Arizona counties in 2020:
While CTCL has not yet disclosed full details about how much was distributed to each grantee during the 2020 election, publicly available data shows that CTCL funneled more than $5 million into nine Arizona jurisdictions.8 Based on the preliminary numbers, a large share of that money was spent in counties carried by President Biden.9 Unsurprisingly, Maricopa County, the fourth most populous county in America and home to more than 60 percent of Arizona’s voters, received more than half of all Zuckerbucks distributed in the state. . .

While data is limited due to CTCL’s unwillingness to make full reports on grant allocations and spending public, initial analysis points to Zuckerbucks having an influence on election outcomes in Arizona. On average, counties that received Zuckerbucks saw the Democratic presidential candidate’s share of the vote increase compared to the 2016 election.
For example, in Maricopa County, the only county in the state to flip in the 2020 election, President Trump increased his vote total by more than 248,000 votes yet lost the county to Biden. In 2020, Biden improved on Hillary Clinton’s 2016 vote total in the county by more than 337,000 votes. This nearly 90,000-vote difference cannot be explained by registration increases. While Democratic voter registration in Maricopa County has grown more than Republican registration since the 2016 election, the net increase was fewer than 50,000 votes and registered Republicans still outnumber registered Democrats by more than 100,000 voters. In counties that went for Biden in 2020, Zuckerbucks seem to have helped boost Democratic turnout.
Several other state legislatures are considering bills to ban the private funding of election administration.

Georgia’s Election Integrity Act, signed into law by Gov. Kemp in March, included a clause designed to ban the private funding of election administration, but the Amistad Project’s Phill Kline believes that law may contain loopholes.

Kline has praised the simple one sentence language of Arizona’s new law–“Notwithstanding any other law, this state and a city, town, county, school district or other public body that conducts or administers elections may not receive or expend private monies for preparing for, administering or conducting an election, including registering voters” — as the gold standard and model for other states that seek to ban the private funding of election administration.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Bombshell Fraud In Montana: 6% More Mail-In Ballots Than Votes, Video of Counting Is Missing
by CD Media StaffApril 10, 2021713169

John Lott details the little noticed but massive voter fraud uncovered in Montana.

war room.JPG
Rumble video on website 3:08 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Rumble video 1:39:55 Min (Starts at 1:56 min)
Interview with Matt Deperno on new EXPLOSIVE evidence submitted in Michigan
CanCon Live Channel Published April 10, 2021
Tonight we sit down with Matt Deperno and Bill Bailey of the Antrim County Michigan case and discuss the new evidence brief that was uploaded yesterday!
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Rumble video 1:56:17 min
Jovan Hutton Pulitzer - EXPOSING FRAUD and Restoring FAITH in Elections
The Professor's Record with David K. Clements Published April 9, 2021
Rumble — I am joined by a modern day Benjamin Franklin. Jovan Hutton Pulitzer is a world renowned entrepreneur, inventor, and most importantly, a PATRIOT. Jovan holds HUNDREDS of patents on technology used by billions of people around the world. He is also the chief authority on kinematic artifact scanning. He can detect a myriad of different forms of fraud on any piece of paper. This includes ELECTION BALLOTS. Meet the most feared expert in the world that every corrupt politician is trying to stop. Our country's future hangs in the balance. We address it all on this episode of The Professor's Record.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

“I Was Offered $10 Million Not to Do This!” – Jovan Pulitzer on Offer to Walk Away from His Scanning the Ballots Work on 2020 Election Results

By Joe Hoft
Published April 10, 2021 at 4:30pm
Pulitzer-and-Clements.jpg

Jovan Hutton Pulitzer was on “The Professor’s Record” with professor David K. Clements from New Mexico State University. During his interview, Pulitzer said he was recently offered $10 million to walk away from his efforts to scan the ballots and determine the number of valid votes in the 2020 election in various states.

Inventor Jovan Pulitzer was on with attorney and professor David K. Clements this past week’s “The Professor’s Record”. The professor described the interview as such:
I am joined by a modern day Benjamin Franklin. Jovan Hutton Pulitzer is a world renowned entrepreneur, inventor, and most importantly, a PATRIOT. Jovan holds HUNDREDS of patents on technology used by billions of people around the world. He is also the chief authority on kinematic artifact scanning. He can detect a myriad of different forms of fraud on any piece of paper. This includes ELECTION BALLOTS. Meet the most feared expert in the world that every corrupt politician is trying to stop. Our country’s future hangs in the balance. We address it all on this episode of The Professor’s Record.
You can find me at theprofessorsrecord.com and at The Professor's Record.

You can find Jovan Hutton Pulitzer at JovanHuttonPulitzer
and http://www.jovanhuttonpulitzer.org.
At one point during their exchange Pulitzer shared:
Two things. I had, and just so you know how bad this is, and I’m going to give you a nugget that nobody outside of my inner circle knows this. I got offered $10 million dollars to not do this.
I have no price. It can’t be done. This is about America. There isn’t enough money in America to turn us communist and to sell out America. I’ll take a bullet to the head. And, maybe that’s what’s waiting for me.
See the entire interview below (exchange above noted at the beginning):

We’ve reached out to Jovan to see if he has any additional information regarding the offer.

[See interview in post above]
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Some people, like myself, are convinced that the fundamental American notion of self governance is gone unless we do a full autopsy on the 2020 election. Then we fix what allowed it to happen. The first step is absolute proof that it did happen.

I noticed that my prior county elections clerk is holding a public meeting on whether to renew the Dominion contract and what to do if they don't renew. I imagine these negotiations are going on all over in preparation for the setting of the county budget in the next month and a half. The time is now.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
Some people, like myself, are convinced that the fundamental American notion of self governance is gone unless we do a full autopsy on the 2020 election. Then we fix what allowed it to happen. The first step is absolute proof that it did happen.
You're with Steve Bannon on this. Without full forensics the trust of the Joe6P voters will not be regained. And without trust that it is done honestly, it will never happen honestly.

It is a logical spiral.

One that the Democrats have wound up until the democratic spring has broken.

Removing trust in institutions is at least half of the Marxist game plan, and what gives them an AO.

I have no price. It can’t be done. This is about America. There isn’t enough money in America to turn us communist and to sell out America. I’ll take a bullet to the head. And, maybe that’s what’s waiting for me.

Gosh. Mr. Pulitzer makes the mane stand up on the back of my head.

Time for Trump's 2020 Signature Opus. (Still there on Youtube)

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTj4h5loLp8


Ohhh...

Dobbin
 
Top