When I posted this I knew it was pretty clear what course our government had chosen to pursue. The general's statement was as short & concise as the 101st's commanders response to the Germans when they asked for his surrender, "Nut's". How ambiguous is " We have NG troops from all 50 states to help support the Secret Service & police transition to a military power."?
NG troops from all 50 states. Implying that at least the commander of the NG from every state recognized the election was not legitimate. Don't get me wrong I am not talking about the Governors. The general in command of each state recognized there was fraud.
But, but, but the general can't call up the state's NG. No they can not but, they can go into the governors office & have a conversation about what is happening & that their state WILL participate in determining what happened & who won.
Then he specifically mentions the secret service & police. Why? To demonstrate this is not the military alone but those charged with protecting the President & those entrusted with enforcing our laws.
Oh c'mon that could never happen. Uh I think you are looking at the results right now.
How about this, those who have followed Q (yes I am going there. So if you just can't begin to believe this horse shit stop reading now) have been told the story of how the military was ready to pull the trigger on Obama & remove him. But cooler heads prevailed & they decided to approach Donald (I am a stud(for the haters)) Trump & ask him to run for President. I mean how crazy is that? Ask a billionaire loved by most of the world, married to a super model, has successful children, can play golf & travel when he pleases. To take on a thankless, grueling, non-stop, ass kicking contest of a job to help the middle & lower class slobs no-one else cares about & restore the rule of law to the most arrogant self centered country of jackasses the world has ever seen. Is that about right?
So what if that never happened? But instead The same military that supposedly made up Q, but didn't. What if the general's are sitting at the Pentagon BSing over drinks & someone brings this story up. They all get a good laugh at the gullibility of the American public & they file it away as a great joke.
But then they watch the democrats & the MSM do their little two step screwing over this guy. This guy who got them out of wars. Gave them more money, new equipment, & improved their lives. What if they were into their drinks after the first impeachment or the stolen election or whatever insert reason here & one of them said "you know we do have a duty to protect the Constitution & this (insert reason here) is BS I think we should.....".
Did they? Will they? Won't they? Can they? Hell I don't know don't ask me I always give money back when they give me too much change.
The military is all about taking advantage of their enemies mistakes especially after making them make that mistake. But outside of war they are all about rules, fairness & order. They all know how crooked politicians & career civil servants are. Hell they spent their careers watching their civilian counterparts get rich & living large while they lived by MacArthur's mantra duty, honor, country wading through combat zones, divorces, transfers & new CIC's all while trying not to make a mistake that would end their career.
Call me naive, soft hearted ( or headed) blind to the ways of the world & the evil's of men but, I still say the general's statement was very clear. "Transition to military power" is completely different than "to ensure President elect Biden's inauguration."
If I am wrong then "DOOM ON".