BRKG Supreme Court rules Texas has no Standing

The Cub

Behold, I am coming soon.
Might need a bit of editing.....


Declaration of Independence of Texas, 1836


Declaration of Independence of Texas

The Unanimous Declaration of Independence made by the Delegates of the People of Texas in General Convention at the Town of Washington on the 2nd day of March 1836

When a government has ceased to protect the lives, liberty and property of the people, from whom its legitimate powers are derived, and for the advancement of whose happiness it was instituted, and so far from being a guarantee for the enjoyment of those inestimable and inalienable rights, becomes an instrument in the hands of evil rulers for their oppression.

When the Federal Republican Constitution of their country, which they have sworn to support, no longer has a substantial existence, and the whole nature of their government has been forcibly changed, without their consent, from a restricted federative republic, composed of sovereign states, to a consolidated central military despotism, in which every interest is disregarded but that of the army and the priesthood, both the eternal enemies of civil liberty, the everready minions of power, and the usual instruments of tyrants.

When, long after the spirit of the constitution has departed, moderation is at length so far lost by those in power, that even the semblance of freedom is removed, and the forms themselves of the constitution discontinued, and so far from their petitions and remonstrances being regarded, the agents who bear them are thrown into dungeons, and mercenary armies sent forth to force a new government upon them at the point of the bayonet.

When, in consequence of such acts of malfeasance and abdication on the part of the government, anarchy prevails, and civil society is dissolved into its original elements. In such a crisis, the first law of nature, the right of self-preservation, the inherent and inalienable rights of the people to appeal to first principles, and take their political affairs into their own hands in extreme cases, enjoins it as a right towards themselves, and a sacred obligation to their posterity, to abolish such government, and create another in its stead, calculated to rescue them from impending dangers, and to secure their future welfare and happiness.

Nations, as well as individuals, are amenable for their acts to the public opinion of mankind. A statement of a part of our grievances is therefore submitted to an impartial world, in justification of the hazardous but unavoidable step now taken, of severing our political connection with the Mexican people, and assuming an independent attitude among the nations of the earth.

The Mexican government, by its colonization laws, invited and induced the Anglo-American population of Texas to colonize its wilderness under the pledged faith of a written constitution, that they should continue to enjoy that constitutional liberty and republican government to which they had been habituated in the land of their birth, the United States of America.

In this expectation they have been cruelly disappointed, inasmuch as the Mexican nation has acquiesced in the late changes made in the government by General Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna, who having overturned the constitution of his country, now offers us the cruel alternative, either to abandon our homes, acquired by so many privations, or submit to the most intolerable of all tyranny, the combined despotism of the sword and the priesthood.

It has sacrificed our welfare to the state of Coahuila, by which our interests have been continually depressed through a jealous and partial course of legislation, carried on at a far distant seat of government, by a hostile majority, in an unknown tongue, and this too, notwithstanding we have petitioned in the humblest terms for the establishment of a separate state government, and have, in accordance with the provisions of the national constitution, presented to the general Congress a republican constitution, which was, without just cause, contemptuously rejected.

It incarcerated in a dungeon, for a long time, one of our citizens, for no other cause but a zealous endeavor to procure the acceptance of our constitution, and the establishment of a state government.

It has failed and refused to secure, on a firm basis, the right of trial by jury, that palladium of civil liberty, and only safe guarantee for the life, liberty, and property of the citizen.

It has failed to establish any public system of education, although possessed of almost boundless resources, (the public domain,) and although it is an axiom in political science, that unless a people are educated and enlightened, it is idle to expect the continuance of civil liberty, or the capacity for self government.

It has suffered the military commandants, stationed among us, to exercise arbitrary acts of oppression and tyrrany, thus trampling upon the most sacred rights of the citizens, and rendering the military superior to the civil power.

It has dissolved, by force of arms, the state Congress of Coahuila and Texas, and obliged our representatives to fly for their lives from the seat of government, thus depriving us of the fundamental political right of representation.

It has demanded the surrender of a number of our citizens, and ordered military detachments to seize and carry them into the Interior for trial, in contempt of the civil authorities, and in defiance of the laws and the constitution.

It has made piratical attacks upon our commerce, by commissioning foreign desperadoes, and authorizing them to seize our vessels, and convey the property of our citizens to far distant ports for confiscation.

It denies us the right of worshipping the Almighty according to the dictates of our own conscience, by the support of a national religion, calculated to promote the temporal interest of its human functionaries, rather than the glory of the true and living God.

It has demanded us to deliver up our arms, which are essential to our defence, the rightful property of freemen, and formidable only to tyrannical governments.

It has invaded our country both by sea and by land, with intent to lay waste our territory, and drive us from our homes; and has now a large mercenary army advancing, to carry on against us a war of extermination.

It has, through its emissaries, incited the merciless savage, with the tomahawk and scalping knife, to massacre the inhabitants of our defenseless frontiers.

It hath been, during the whole time of our connection with it, the contemptible sport and victim of successive military revolutions, and hath continually exhibited every characteristic of a weak, corrupt, and tyrranical government.

These, and other grievances, were patiently borne by the people of Texas, untill they reached that point at which forbearance ceases to be a virtue. We then took up arms in defence of the national constitution. We appealed to our Mexican brethren for assistance. Our appeal has been made in vain. Though months have elapsed, no sympathetic response has yet been heard from the Interior.

We are, therefore, forced to the melancholy conclusion, that the Mexican people have acquiesced in the destruction of their liberty, and the substitution therfor of a military government; that they are unfit to be free, and incapable of self government.

The necessity of self-preservation, therefore, now decrees our eternal political separation.

We, therefore, the delegates with plenary powers of the people of Texas, in solemn convention assembled, appealing to a candid world for the necessities of our condition, do hereby resolve and declare, that our political connection with the Mexican nation has forever ended, and that the people of Texas do now constitute a free, Sovereign, and independent republic, and are fully invested with all the rights and attributes which properly belong to independent nations; and, conscious of the rectitude of our intentions, we fearlessly and confidently commit the issue to the decision of the Supreme arbiter of the destinies of nations.

[Signed, in the order shown on the handwritten document]

John S. D. Byrom
Francis Ruis
J. Antonio Navarro
Jesse B. Badgett
Wm D. Lacy
William Menifee
Jn. Fisher
Matthew Caldwell
William Motley
Lorenzo de Zavala
Stephen H. Everett
George W. Smyth
Elijah Stapp
Claiborne West
Wm. B. Scates
M. B. Menard
A. B. Hardin
J. W. Bunton
Thos. J. Gazley
R. M. Coleman
Sterling C. Robertson
Richard Ellis, President
of the Convention and Delegate
from Red River
James Collinsworth
Edwin Waller
Asa Brigham
Charles B. Stewart
Thomas Barnett
Geo. C. Childress
Bailey Hardeman
Rob. Potter
Thomas Jefferson Rusk
Chas. S. Taylor
John S. Roberts
Robert Hamilton
Collin McKinney
Albert H. Latimer
James Power
Sam Houston
David Thomas
Edwd. Conrad
Martin Parmer
Edwin O. Legrand
Stephen W. Blount
Jms. Gaines
Wm. Clark, Jr.
Sydney O. Pennington
Wm. Carrol Crawford
Jno. Turner
Benj. Briggs Goodrich
G. W. Barnett
James G. Swisher
Jesse Grimes
S. Rhoads Fisher
John W. Moore
John W. Bower
Saml. A. Maverick (from Bejar)
Sam P. Carson
A. Briscoe
J. B. Woods
H. S. Kimble, Secretary
 

jazzy

Advocate Discernment
Now where in the Constitution does it say one state can interfere in the elections of another state?


the point texas and the other states were making was because those 4 states did not follow consitutional law which is only the state legislature can make changes to a states election laws --not gov, sos, ag, etc--thus their illegal election results harms other states who did follow constitutional law. that the election results in those states are illegitimate. from a legal site tht is what i understand the TX suit was founded on.

im going to wait and see what judicialwatch says and some other legal types as legal stuff has layers. one door closes, another opens. i know everyone is getting riled and impatient for some butt kicking and this to be over. i am too. but theres steps to follow.

the real case is voter fraud, there is a ton of actual evidence and witnesses, thats the meat of the case. to me if the SC ignores or discounts all that mountain of evidence, to me, THEN we are sunk.
just my opinion
 
Last edited:

Ragnarok

On and On, South of Heaven
The Supreme Court on Friday tossed a last-minute bid by the state of Texas to overturn the 2020 election by challenging the results of four battleground states.



Citing a lack of standing, Justice Samuel Alito wrote in a brief order that the state "has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections," adding "All other pending motions are dismissed as moot."

In doing so, the justices shut down a long-shot bid for Texas to challenge Biden's wins in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia and Wisconsin - which was joined by 17 other states and over 100 House Republicans.

IT'S GAME OVER. pic.twitter.com/2gpADLR7s9
— Adrian McKinty (@adrianmckinty) December 11, 2020

Justices Clarence Thomas joined Alito in stating that they do not believe the court has the authority to outright reject Texas's request, writing instead "I would therefore grant the motion to file the bill of complaint but would not grant other relief, and I express no view on any other issue."

Earlier in the day, President Trump tweeted: "If the Supreme Court shows great Wisdom and Courage, the American People will win perhaps the most important case in history, and our Electoral Process will be respected again!"

If the Supreme Court shows great Wisdom and Courage, the American People will win perhaps the most important case in history, and our Electoral Process will be respected again!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 11, 2020
Notably, Trump appointed three of the court's nine members - causing Democrats to cry foul at the prospect of the highest court in the land deciding the outcome of the 2020 election. Trump himself suggested several times that filling Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's seat with Justice Amy Coney Barrett was essential in the event that the election ended up at the Court.


One hour ago Fox News released a poll that said "68% of Republicans believe the election was stolen from President Trump." Overall: 36% of American voters say they think he was robbed. Fox News Poll: Most Republicans say President Trump was robbed pic.twitter.com/T6Vteerkw9
— Brian Stelter (@brianstelter) December 12, 2020
The case was filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who asked the Court to invalidate over 20 million votes in the above-mentioned states so that their GOP-controlled state legislatures could decide who won instead.

AGs from Pennsylvania and Michigan have responded to the decision:

Michigan AG @DanaNessel, whose state was also targeted:

“Today’s Supreme Court decision is an important reminder that we are a nation of laws, and though some may bend to the desire of a single individual, the courts will not." pic.twitter.com/l1lW6HdQT8
— Adam Klasfeld (@KlasfeldReports) December 12, 2020
The Texas GOP, meanwhile, suggests that "law-abiding states should bond together and form a Union of states that will abide by the constitution."

The @TexasGOP is out with a statement in the wake of the Supreme Court decision, all but calling for secession:

“Perhaps law-abiding states should bond together and form a Union of states that will abide by the constitution.” pic.twitter.com/4bB3gk88t4
— Adam Kelsey (@adamkelsey) December 12, 2020
 

Ragnarok

On and On, South of Heaven
Done ?

Or just done waiting for a .gov savior ?

Read the article, again...

Citing a lack of standing, Justice Samuel Alito wrote in a brief order that the state "has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections," adding "All other pending motions are dismissed as moot."
 

Troke

On TB every waking moment
the point texas and the other states were making was because those 4 states did not follow consitutional law which is only the state legislature can make changes to a states election laws --not gov, sos, ag, etc--thus their illegal election results harms other states who did follow constitutional law. that the election results in those states are illegitimate. from a legal site tht is what i understand the TX suit was founded on.
I think you are right. But we all wanted Conservative judges. Well, we got Conservative judges. And Conservative judges are very leery over getting into election returns. And it showed.

I would be a little curious as to the capability of our lawyers. I keep hearing rumors on the Street that they were not really up to the job. Be a shame that we lost because our boys could not come up with a iron clad legal argument.
 

Cascadians

Leska Emerald Adams
So in the USA now there is no legal remedy for lying and cheating and breaking laws, committing felonies and stealing an election, committing treason and sedition.

The 4th Turning is most definitely HERE IN FULL. All trust in our institutions is GONE.
We are gaslighted, prosecuted, muzzled, censored, poisoned, and pushed into communism slavery.
 

Cabal

Pissed off Patriot
the point texas and the other states were making was because those 4 states did not follow consitutional law which is only the state legislature can make changes to a states election laws --not gov, sos, ag, etc--thus their illegal election results harms other states who did follow constitutional law. that the election results in those states are illegitimate. from a legal site tht is what i understand the TX suit was founded on.

im going to wait and see what judicialwatch says and some other legal types as legal stuff has layers. one door closes, another opens. i know everyone is getting riled and impatient for some butt kicking and this to be over. i am too. but theres steps to follow.

the real case is voter fraud, there is a ton of actual evidence and witnesses, thats the meat of the case. to me if the SC ignores or discounts all that mountain of evidence, to me, THEN we are sunk.
just my opinion

That's great that we have reams of evidence... problem is no court will give it the time of day, so you may as well wipe your ass with all that evidence...
 

Ragnarok

On and On, South of Heaven
All 3 Trump Supreme Court Appointees Decline Texas Election Case

All three of President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court appointees — Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett — joined Chief Justice John Roberts and the three liberal justices in declining to hear Texas v. Pennsylvania.

In a short order issued Friday, the Court declared that Texas lacked standing to bring its case against Pennsylvania and three other states whose election rules were changed outside their respective state legislatures, as the Constitution requires.

Throughout Barrett’s confirmation process this past fall, Democrats suggested that Trump had appointed her in exchange for favorable judgements during the election. Barrett denied that the president had ever raised the election with her at all.

The three new Trump appointees voted with their liberal colleagues, whose votes were never in doubt. Roberts has lately moved toward the liberal camp, and voted accordingly. Ironically, only Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, both appointed by Trump’s Republican predecessors (George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush, respectively), voted to hear the case. Four justices out of the nine would have had to agree to hear the case for it to have proceeded at the Supreme Court.

Conservative radio host Mark Levin, commenting on the Court’s decision, remarked that it may have “slit its own throat,” because the same rules being challenged in Georgia would apply to the Senate runoffs in January, and Democrats have discussed packing the Court with new liberal justices if they win both Senate seats and take control of the upper chamber.
 

TxGal

Day by day
Hey folks! There was a lawsuit going on way before Texas even filed theirs don't forget. Trumps team of lawyers aren't done yet. I won't give up until Jan. 20th.

That's what I was trying to remember, just need details! There was/were other suits in progress before Texas jumped in and really got everyone going. Now that the attempt by Texas has been slammed down, we need to think back to the other options that were being pursued.

What are the other ones?
 

Ragnarok

On and On, South of Heaven

Tracy Beanz

@tracybeanz

Replying to

@tracybeanz
I want everyone to please stop hyperventilating. In war, should you lose a battle you don’t take your toys and go home. Now isn’t the time for defeatism. TX brought a case to the SCOTUS. BEFORE a the TX filing there was a strategy in place. It remains.

Who?

Some C-Span journo with one contribution under her name?


Tracy Beanz is an Editor in Chief for the UncoverDC with one video in the C-SPAN Video Library
 

Doomer Doug

TB Fanatic
Well, I did not see the level of moral squalor, cowardice, and corruption at the SCOTUS level. For Alito and Thomas to be the ones to murder the American Republic is particularly disgusting. And the context of it all is the ongoing creation of a Marxist commune in Portland, Oregon dedicated to the violent overthrow of the same Republic. So, we have both Thomas and Alito engaged in TREASON in cahoots with Antifa.

I will wait till January 20th, mostly for making some final arrangements.
The only options we have now are War and forming independent regional areas.

we have been betrayed by our entire systems and each of the insitutions.
And we know what Biden and his pet bitch will do.

SCOTUS is scum, fools and TRAITORS. History will record that the American Republic lasted from 1776 to 2020 and was destroyed due to the moral failure of the entire leadership but especially the legal system.

WROL. Individual people will make decisions and choices and execute and implement actions based on their core values of which it has just been proven SCOTUS has none.

Trump's only option now is state sanctioned violence, if he has the stomach for it. Given the brazen treason done by china here in CONUS SCOTUS MUST HAVE BEEN made a Chinese agent and as such are subject to summary execution, even the so called conservative ones for TREASON.


And yeah, I can no longer guarantee that armed revolt won't break out this weekend, as in firefights between MAGA and Antifa/blm types. We shall see if things at least hold together till the 20th, but maybe not.
 

sjhenderson

Senior Member
The rules have changed. There aren’t any. Get that straight. None for them ... none for us. Would you like to play this game. Do not follow rules ... anymore.

They‘re depending on us to believe their new powers over us are absolute.
Cool thing about being a kid, rules don't really matter, then you get older and they do as you have so much to lose, then you get older say 63 like me and you are like a kid yet again. So yep ignore their rules as they are now 100% corrupt at the highest level. Rule of Law is 100% gone, unless it is taken back.
 

jazzy

Advocate Discernment
the SC accepted lin woods case against GA SoS to stop certification of votes

This Petition for a Writ of Certiorari seeks to halt the certification of votes by the Secretary of State based upon his entering into an unconstitutional agreement that subverts plenary protocols. In essence, he’s saying that the vote and subsequent counting of the votes went against state laws, the state constitution, and the U.S. Constitution by not allowing for Equal Protection.



all this legal stuff is like a dance with intricate steps. the dance aint over
 

CaryC

Has No Life - Lives on TB
the SC accepted lin woods case against GA SoS to stop certification of votes

This Petition for a Writ of Certiorari seeks to halt the certification of votes by the Secretary of State based upon his entering into an unconstitutional agreement that subverts plenary protocols. In essence, he’s saying that the vote and subsequent counting of the votes went against state laws, the state constitution, and the U.S. Constitution by not allowing for Equal Protection.



all this legal stuff is like a dance with intricate steps. the dance aint over
It's over, talking heads don't want to admit it.

So what if GA goes to court and loses? What will it change? Nothing. It might change the procedure next time as in 2022, but now for President, nothing.

You can hang on to the GA case and say it gets overturned blah blah won't help Trump ANY. One state? Naw not going to happen.
 
Top