BRKG Warrants Served on St. Louis Couple Who Defended Home

Hogwrench

Senior Member

Mark and Patricia McCloskey, the brave St. Louis couple who defended their mansion against an invading horde of thugs, tell me they have been served with a search warrant.

The warrant was executed Friday night at their home in an exclusive gated community.

Mr. McCloskey tells The Todd Starnes Radio Show that police seized the AR-15 he was photographed holding while an angry mob assembled on the lawn of his private home.
 

Redleg

Veteran Member
So was the point to obtain the weapons as evidence, or was it to make sure the couple have no weapons for the next visit by the thugs?
Well, if it was just those weapons that they wanted and got lets hope they have backup weapons just in case. Hopefully the other weapons are in a different location as backup. I think this is B.S. They didn't do anything wrong, just defending their property and themselves.
 

et2

Has No Life - Lives on TB
But what about the property destruction charges and trespassing against the Antifa and BLM ? Surely they can identify some of those protestors.

The liberal commies are sending a message ... we’re coming for you and your guns. The hilarious part is these two were Democrats. Wanna bet not this year?
 

Doomer Doug

TB Fanatic
Under the law she was guilty of brandishing her weapon at people who did not provide an 'IMMINENT THREAT OF GRIEVOUS BODILY HARM." The husband maintained a "defensive posture," and should not have been served, much less charged. Soros has been funding the election of assorted DA's so he can get control at the local level.

She now has several things going for her, and that will crush the DA, First, they were trespassing. Second they engaged in verbal abuse of her and her husband. Third, they came back a second time. They are lawyers so she will have an excellent defense.

The bottom line is unless you think they will kill or seriously wound you in the immediate future you don't get to wave your gun at them. We may not like it, but no you don't get to what she did. It doesn't matter if you are afraid. It doesn't matter if they annoy you, or anger you: UNLESS YOU CAN PROVE YOU ARE IN IMMINENT DANGER OF BEING SHOT, KILLED, OR SERIOUSLY WOUNDED YOU CAN'T THREATEN THEM.

The mistake they both made was to go out, openly confront them in their front yard, engage them verbally and wave their guns around. Now, if the first rock had been thrown, or they had come up onto their porch, or tried to break into the house they could have shot all 500 of them no problem. But they knew the law, played them, drew them in and now they are going to get, the wife will, get crushed by the DA who has an excellent case against her.
 

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
Mr. McCloskey tells The Todd Starnes Radio Show that police seized the AR-15 he was photographed holding while an angry mob assembled on the lawn of his private home.
So was the point to obtain the weapons as evidence, or was it to make sure the couple have no weapons for the next visit by the thugs?
Yes

Lesson - might as well be hung for a sheep as for a lamb.
Agreed

Under the law she was guilty of brandishing her weapon at people who did not provide an 'IMMINENT THREAT OF GRIEVOUS BODILY HARM." The husband maintained a "defensive posture," and should not have been served,
Truth
 

Bps1691

Veteran Member
But what about the property destruction charges and trespassing against the Antifa and BLM ? Surely they can identify some of those protestors.

The liberal commies are sending a message ... we’re coming for you and your guns. The hilarious part is these two were Democrats. Wanna bet not this year?

St. Louis is a violent city and fights it out with the other demon-crat shitholes for number one with a violent crime rate of 2,082 per 100,000 people in 2017. For the fifth straight year, St. Louis will most likely have the nation’s highest murder rate for cities with over 100,000 people, Blacks are the largest race group at 47.61%.

By the way soros money pushed her into the prosecutors office....

… she had already proven her self to be worthless even before the riots by haranguing the police, the justice system and whites in particular, failed to prosecute based upon race and has been under tremendous pressure with multiple sources trying to get her out of office

… she has made a mockery of the law within the city of Saint Louis

She has an active civil rights lawsuit in Federal Courts where she blames all the pushback and legal actions against her by accusing the city, the city's police union and others of a coordinated and racist conspiracy aimed at forcing her out of office

Here's how far her warped sense of justice and of the equal rule of law goes...

Soros-Backed St. Louis Circuit Attorney Releases All Rioters and Looters from Jail Without Charges Following Monday’s Mass Rioting

The Soros backed DA in St Louis just did what Soros wanted her to do. She released every looter and rioter from the past week without filing a single charge against them.

St Louis DA already had the reputation of being a criminal’s best friend forever and now she cements that position.

Remember, this is right after four policemen were shot in St Louis. (The Champagne flowed in the DA’s office the next day) How will you never stop riots when no one goes to jail or even to trial.

If they are picked up again, Kim Gardner will just set them free again. Do you still question which side progressives are on?

Soros-Backed St. Louis Circuit Attorney Releases All Rioters and Looters from Jail Without Charges Following Monday’s Mass Rioting

Yet she goes after two WHITES who dared to defend themselves using their God Given right memorialized in the constitution. This cannot end well.
 

Doomer Doug

TB Fanatic
Here is a youtube video I found on a channel called In Your Defense. He explains PERFECTLY why this happened, and why charges are being made. I applied for my own Multnomah County Concealed Handgun Permit 10 days ago and "should" have it "soon.":kaid:

At any rate, watch this six minute video. I'm not sure why he is being charged, much less have his weapons seized, so he is going to have a good solid lawsuit against the DA for her abuse of him, but his wife, well she got baited and is going to pay the price.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DJ0Elfkrz0


Your FEAR Is Irrelevant! Brandishing is a CRIME
9,783 views
•Jul 4, 2020

331120SHARESAVE
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Doc1

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Several quick notes:
* Brandishing and defensive display laws vary widely across the fifty states. Know yours.
* No one should be under any illusions about fair and impartial justice anymore. Justice has become a political football, designed to punish (political) enemies and protect (political) friends. The McCloskey case is a perfect example, where they are prosecuted but the rioters are not charged or are released.
* We are at the point where you should not respect the law, but should fear it.

Best
Doc
 

Buckaroo

Contributing Member
I would think that "Disparity of Force" would justify the implied use of deadly force against the angry, threatening mob that was hurling threats of bodily harm at the McCloskeys. Angry groups of people are generally much more dangerous than one or two individuals.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
I would think that "Disparity of Force" would justify the implied use of deadly force against the angry, threatening mob that was hurling threats of bodily harm at the McCloskeys. Angry groups of people are generally much more dangerous than one or two individuals.

That's for a court to decide, since that appears to be where it's going....
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
They had a right to defend their property, with all of those people busting down the gate/fence and trespassing. People were threatening to hurt their dog/kill the dog, and hollering which bedroom was theirs, etc.

This is absolutely insane, makes no sense...it is maybe a staged FF?
 

WildDaisy

God has a plan, Trust it!
The liberal commies are sending a message ... we’re coming for you and your guns. The hilarious part is these two were Democrats. Wanna bet not this year?

That IS the agenda. It is right out of the 10 Stages of genocide playbook. Never forget how they came for the Jews/Rwanda/Kurds/etc. Same MO, same playbook every time. Their aim is to take away our guns (and the legal rights to get them). By doing that, they lesson the probability to fight. Then they take away our right to work, our right to buy and sell. With one swift push of a button, they can target us and turn everything off in this day and age. Yes, there will be pockets of us that wont give up those things, go into hiding and are prepped and ready to dig in and fight, or head for the hills, but the reality is, that most people wont be able to do this because they have been in denial about what is coming.

The end game is first hunting down the conservatives, and specifically the Christians. The bible already warns about it. It is coming, and faster than we think.
 

Doomer Doug

TB Fanatic
they both have excellent cases and will likely win a jury trial. the thing about this type of Marxist Scum, this soros funded bitch, and all the BLM, Antifa types is they are making some fatal assumptions here. They are assuming, which is correct for now, that they can count on the full media, police, legal, court system to support them as some kind of Roman legion type auxillary. Well, this particular case just went a long long way towards derailing that whole sweet heart deal they got. The long suffering normals understand what just happened, and they will put up with it for a while longer. However, this soros funded bitch and her support staff will find out once the "revolution" happens, they can't control it anymore.

The law of the jungle will favor us and not them.
 

Doomer Doug

TB Fanatic
I don't know how often I have to repeat this: The 2nd amendment changes everything in terms of the Marxist Death Squads, and the violent implementation of the new Marxist tyranny. NO other Revolution, not a single one, has EVER, EVER, EVER gone up against an armed peasant. So, all this Obamabot/Soros funded bitch proved is she hasn't pissed off people enough, yet.

Finally, I'm not sure two Democrat lawyers are a good sample of Patriots. The two fools were played and will pay the price. I can guarantee you all MILLIONS OF PATRIOTS ARE LOOKING AT THIS situation, drawing their own conclusions, and making their own judgments, and they are not the conclusions the Marxist scum like. Tempt not a desperate man, saith the Bard Shakespeare. The two lawyers had too much too loose, and were not mentally capable of defending it. BLM or whoever they are chose their target well, but what do you think would have happened if they had gone into a trailer park out in deep Missouri? Not one of them, and not any of the cops sent to guard them would have been found. And that DA, well she would never have even left Saint Louis.

The reason some people are still alive is because other people haven't shot them yet.

This DA will have power until we decide she is full of feces and ignore her. And when Antifa looks around, they will be all by their lonesome. BLM, well they can only play their game until we get tired of it.
 

zeker

Has No Life - Lives on TB
I would think that "Disparity of Force" would justify the implied use of deadly force against the angry, threatening mob that was hurling threats of bodily harm at the McCloskeys. Angry groups of people are generally much more dangerous than one or two individuals.

there must be audio somewhere where the crowd can be heard yelling threats.

if so.. that would be a step in their defense
 

Luddite

Veteran Member
:popcorn1:

Might as well laugh as cry.

The Shenanigans on corporate and business property as well as the desecration of monuments on public land was round 1.

Moving to private property is Round 2.

This was a "shark bump". Glen Beck discussed these years ago.

Don't forget the gate that was destroyed at the beginning of their march. I read it was private property. Yes, I know some private property has been destroyed throughout the nation. None with this much exposure.

Not clear to me what the charges were... Looks like they took the evil black rifle into custody but left her nickel plated pecker wrecker.

Interesting Times.
 

Luddite

Veteran Member
So the high connections, Democrat party donations and civil rights work they did didn't mean squat.
Hopefully a lot of affluent democrat voting whites are watching this and its gonna be a double espresso intenso and wake them the feck up.
This may be the silver lining of this current debacle.
 

Wargus

Mildly off
Mao Zedong said "Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun". China’s crackdown on gun control started in 1966. They extended it in 1996 when the government banned everything to do with firearms without the old official ok.
Just another turn of the gears in the communist machine. Slowly treading forward with YOU under it.
 
Last edited:

ssonb

Senior Member
They may HAVE been Democrat but it is amazing to watch them eat their own.
BTW I like the old special forces saying, Two is one and one is zero.
 

mikeabn

Finally not a lurker!
But what about the property destruction charges and trespassing against the Antifa and BLM ? Surely they can identify some of those protestors.

The liberal commies are sending a message ... we’re coming for you and your guns. The hilarious part is these two were Democrats. Wanna bet not this year?
Let's hope they become VERY vocal about how their ideological brethren are treating them for simply defending their home and themselves.
 

Terriannie

Has No Life - Lives on TB
St. Louis' DA is stupid but that's to be expected.

If they waited until it was deemed "imminent" and kept behind closed doors until that "imminent" turned to "realtime" someone was going to get killed. Confronting and brandishing those guns saved lives from both sides and the McCloskey's should be thanked.
 

wab54

Veteran Member
Under the law she was guilty of brandishing her weapon at people who did not provide an 'IMMINENT THREAT OF GRIEVOUS BODILY HARM." The husband maintained a "defensive posture," and should not have been served, much less charged.

The mistake they both made was to go out, openly confront them in their front yard, engage them verbally and wave their guns around. Now, if the first rock had been thrown, or they had come up onto their porch, or tried to break into the house they could have shot all 500 of them no problem. But they knew the law, played them, drew them in and now they are going to get, the wife will, get crushed by the DA who has an excellent case against her.

They pointed the guns at them. Thats their mistake. They should not have shown the guns until actually needed.

WAB
 

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
I applied for my own Multnomah County Concealed Handgun Permit 10 days ago
For the record, you applied with the Multnomah County Sheriff’s Office for your Oregon CHL. Permits are statewide, not countywide, but are applied-for at the sheriff’s office of your county of residence.

Also, for your post 17, RUNTIME IS REQUIRED. EVERY TIME. (Why is it you seem to have such a problem with that?) Additionally, the URL you pasted in for the vid starts ir HALFWAY THROUGH. I cleaned it up so it plays from the beginning.

Dude, you’re a GROWN-UP MAN; why do I have to consistently follow along behind you to clean up your sloppy posts? (I clean them up as a service to the other members.)

THE RUNTIME ON YOUR VID IS ABOUT 6:30.
 
Last edited:
Top