CORONA Main Coronavirus thread

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GpokoBndC_s
2:40 min
Coronavirus: How Many People Have Really Died?
•May 28, 2020

Bloomberg QuickTake

So far, more than 300,000 people globally are known to have died because of the coronavirus. And as shocking as those numbers are, experts believe there are actually many more deaths we’re not counting. It might sound macabre, but in order to save lives, you need to count deaths. Knowing how may have died and the context around their deaths is crucial for understanding and fighting the virus. That's because we need to understand how fast and in what groups mortality is rising in order to fine-tune the policies that govern out response to the virus. Experts are looking past the official count to find other ways to investigate just how many people are dying. Alan Lopez is a laureate professor of global health at the University of Melbourne. He’s spent a lot of his life counting the dead and figuring out why people die. Now his efforts have turned to Covid-19. He says monitoring mortality right now is critical for striking the optimal balance between saving people from the pandemic and worsening other health threats. "We need to understand how bad these deaths are increasing in order for us to turn those policy levers and knobs at the right speed in the right direction. So if mortality is still increasing, then we absolutely need to keep doing what we're doing to prevent that. But in order for us to do that, we need to understand reliably how many people are dying as a result of the Covid-19 epidemic. And at what time and at what age they're dying. There's no point making policy now on Covid-19 mortality data four, five or six weeks ago. You need mortality data from the last week and you need it by age, you need it by sex. And you need it to be reliable." Alan and his partner Professor Christopher Murray at the University of Washington in Seattle have spent more than two decades studying mortality rates, and he says getting that reliable data can be tricky. The World Health Organization, as of May 26, said more than 5.3 million people are known to have caught the novel coronavirus and of those more than 6 percent have died. But those numbers aren't reliable. Many people got Covid-19 and weren't tested, so their infection wasn't recorded. Some people died at home, especially when hospitals were overwhelmed. Some people died, too, because they couldn't get treated for another life-threatening condition. So how do you factor in those unreported cases and deaths to get a more realistic number? Alan says, you ask yourself a simple question and go from there. "What if Covid-19 never happened? What would we expect to see in terms of numbers of deaths by age and sex? And then what do we see? And in the absence of any major shock to the system, like an earthquake or a flood or some catastrophic event that causes a lot of deaths, all of those deaths must be due to the only other thing that's happened that's different this year from last year. And that is Covid-19." In countries with robust data Professor Lopez says Covid-19 is probably killing about twice as many people as officially reported. "Somewhere between 70 to 120% more people than the official figures of confirmed possible Covid-19 deaths in hospitals. We can see that already. Unless we monitor this epidemic cleverly and comprehensively by looking at all of the deaths that Covid-19 is causing, we are going to seriously underestimate it." And then there's the matter of figuring out which deaths were the direct result of Covid-19, and which ones were caused by some other, indirect factor. "We need to understand fully the impact of Covid-19 not just as an underlying cause of death in hospitals with these confirmed Covid-19 cases, but also what we call the multiplier effects of Covid-19. The fact that it's likely to increase the risk of major vascular diseases, heart failures, ischemic heart disease, stroke. We're seeing increasing evidence of that. The fact that it's likely to increase death rates from chronic obstructive lung disease, slightly increased death rates among smokers. So it's doing a lot of things that are multiplying up the risks of other causes of death, leading to a much bigger often 2 times higher overall impact than what we're measuring in the specific hospital mortality rate." Professor Lopez leads the Data for Health Initiative, which is funded by the Australian government and Bloomberg Philanthropies.
 

TheSearcher

Are you sure about that?
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AW7CfxHrb-U
.31 min
CDC warns about "aggressive" rats as coronavirus shuts down restaurants
•May 26, 2020


CBS News
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says people may see an increase in "aggressive" rodent behavior since lockdowns and restaurant closures have forced the animals to search for new sources of food.

Restaurants? I thought Pelosi had plenty of ice cream in her fridge.
 

Texican

Live Free & Die Free.... God Freedom Country....
Texas Supreme Court Denies Democrats’ Vote-by-Mail Expansion Scheme
:spns:
Good morning –

Starting the day on a sad note: former U.S. Rep. Sam Johnson passed away yesterday. He was a true gentleman, a devoted Texan, and genuine patriot. We are all the better for his lifetime of selfless service to our nation in the Air Force, the state legislature, and Congress. Rest in peace.

Here is today's Texas Minute.


Texas Scorecard

Michael Quinn Sullivan

Thursday, May 28, 2020
Modify your email preferences.
  • In a ruling issued late yesterday afternoon, the Supreme Court of Texas found “a lack of immunity to COVID-19 is not itself a ‘physical condition’ for being eligible to vote by mail.” This ruling came in a lawsuit pitting the State of Texas against several counties and the Democrat Party. The Democrats, of course, are seeking to use the coronavirus as an excuse to vastly expand mail-in balloting. Erin Anderson has the details.
  • The Supreme Court expresses confidence that county “Clerks and all election officials will comply with the law in good faith” – after noting the issue of mail-in balloting has “long been a subject of intense political debate, in this State and throughout the country.”
  • “Election officials have a duty to reject mail-in ballot applications from voters who are not entitled to vote by mail. In-person voting is the surest way to maintain the integrity of our elections, prevent voter fraud and guarantee that every voter is who they claim to be.” – Attorney General Ken Paxton
  • A separate legal case involving the Democrats’ attempt to expand the fraud-prone mail-in balloting program is pending before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans.
  • TODAY AT 3pm... Take part in a live discussion with grassroots leaders about coronavirus “contact tracing.” They will discuss, in part, the $300 million contract Gov. Greg Abbott signed with a New York company to bring on 4,000 contact tracers. Watch it on the Empower Texans Facebook Live channel.
  • The fears of the Chinese coronavirus –and ensuing government-mandated shutdowns – are threatening to cancel the 2020 Republican National Convention, which is currently scheduled for August 24-27 in Charlotte, North Carolina. As a result, Brandon Waltens writes, Texas Republicans are lobbying to move the national convention to the Lone Star State.
  • While there are officially 2,550 delegates, and an equal number of alternates, thousands more attend the national convention as volunteers, staff, or just to enjoy the festivities. In 2016, 48,000 visitors descended on Cleveland, Ohio, for the Republican Party Convention. That’s something North Carolina’s Democrat Gov. Roy Cooper is threatening to hinder.
  • Texas’ Republican and Democrat parties have taken very different approaches to their state conventions this year. The Texas GOP convention was originally scheduled to be held in Houston in May, but was pushed to July due to coronavirus concerns. Texas Democrats, meanwhile, have moved their state convention to be entirely virtual, taking place online next week.
  • “I think it’s a tradition, unfortunately, of Democrats living in fear and not being willing to lead, not being strong and courageous.” – Republican Party of Texas chairman James Dickey
  • Democrats also like to sow fear among the rest of the population... which brings us back to mail-in ballots.
  • Democrat congressional candidate Carolyn Salter, M.D., appears to be sending emails with fake prescriptions for voters in Texas to apply for mail-in ballots. Her prescription is written for a “diagnosis” of “COVID-19 anxiety.” Our friends at DirectAction Texas have the details. Salter is a running against east Texas Republican incumbent Lance Gooden.
  • Dr. Salter should read the Supreme Court’s ruling before she next whips out her prescription pad.
Please join me in wishing a very happy birthday to Empower Texans’ Darrell Frost!
  • Last week Gov. Greg Abbott and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick asked for a 5 percent cut to some portions of state government – though exempting large sections of spending – in light of the economic slowdown ordered by Gov. Abbott and local officials. Brandon Waltens reports Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller is saying he’ll do even better, announcing plans yesterday to cut the Texas Department of Agriculture’s budget by 10 percent.
  • “This is going to be a tough year for Texas families and state government needs to tighten its belt along with everyone else. While TDA is already a lean, efficient agency that pays its own way, I’ve directed my staff to cut 10 percent without affecting our farmers and ranchers or our rural communities.” – Ag Commissioner Sid Miller
  • Spending $9 million for a $5 million property? That’s what the City of Austin is doing with the taxpayers’ money, reports Jacob Asmussen. The city is spending $8.75 million on a downtown-area hotel that will house roughly 75 homeless people. This means taxpayers will spend more than $116,000 per room—a price that doesn’t even include the ongoing maintenance and operation costs. The property was recently valued at only $4.8 million.
Someone is getting a good deal... it just isn’t the taxpayers.
  • School property taxes are continuing to rise, especially for residents in Denton County. Robert Montoya has the details.
  • A new article in The Federalist takes an unflattering look at the health policy and political implications of mandatory mask orders making their way around the country.
  • “Implementing mandatory mask policies across a society of 300 million because it makes some people feel better is absurd on its face. But the policy makes a lot of sense if you understand its purpose and usefulness to shift the American mindset.” – Molly McCann
  • Looking at numbers from the Centers for Disease Control... A third of all coronavirus cases and deaths in the US have occurred in the Democrat-run slum known as New York City and the immediate area. Yet that region has approximately 12% of the US population.
  • The State of New York has less population than Texas, but has more than 6 times as many cases of Chinese coronavirus... and 19 times as many deaths.

Number of the Day

340,000


Between June 1, 2011 and April 30, 2020, 217,000 illegal aliens had been “charged with more than 340,000 criminal offenses” in Texas.
[Source: Texas Department of Public Safety]

Today in History
Happy birthday to the U.S.Border Patrol. The agency was established by Congress on May 28, 1924.

Quote-Unquote
“A nation that cannot control its borders is not a nation.”
Ronald Reagan

Your Federal & State Lawmakers

U.S. Senator

John Cornyn - R
(202) 224-2934

U.S. Senator
Ted Cruz - R
(202) 224-5922

Governor of Texas
Greg Abbott - R
(512) 463-2000

Lt. Governor
Dan Patrick - R
(512) 463-0001

U.S. House, District 23
Will Hurd - R
(202) 225-4511

Texas Senate, District 19
Pete Flores - R
(512) 463-0119

Texas House, District 74
Poncho Nevarez - D
(512) 463-0566

-----------------------------------------------------

Texican....
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
[COMMENT: I had read that this E.O. had more in it than the MSM covered. So I thought I would post it.]

Executive Order on Regulatory Relief to Support Economic Recovery
ECONOMY & JOBS

Issued on: May 19, 2020
menu ALL NEWS
In December 2019, a novel coronavirus known as SARS-CoV-2 (“the virus”) was first detected in Wuhan, Hubei Province, People’s Republic of China, causing an outbreak of the disease COVID-19, which has now spread globally. The Secretary of Health and Human Services declared a public health emergency on January 31, 2020, under section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d), in response to COVID-19. In Proclamation 9994 of March 13, 2020 (Declaring a National Emergency Concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Outbreak), I declared that the COVID-19 outbreak in the United States constituted a national emergency, beginning March 1, 2020.

I have taken sweeping action to control the spread of the virus in the United States, including by suspending entry of certain foreign nationals who present a risk of transmitting the virus; implementing policies to accelerate acquisition of personal protective equipment and bring new diagnostic capabilities to laboratories; and pressing forward rapidly in the search for effective treatments and vaccines. Our States, tribes, territories, local communities, health authorities, hospitals, doctors and nurses, manufacturers, and critical infrastructure workers have all performed heroic service on the front lines battling COVID-19. Executive departments and agencies (agencies), under my leadership, have helped them by taking hundreds of administrative actions since March, many of which provided flexibility regarding burdensome requirements that stood in the way of implementing the most effective strategies to stop the virus’s spread.

The virus has attacked our Nation’s economy as well as its health. Many businesses and non-profits have been forced to close or lay off workers, and in the last 8 weeks, the Nation has seen more than 36 million new unemployment insurance claims. I have worked with the Congress to provide vital relief to small businesses to keep workers employed and to bring assistance to those who have lost their jobs. On April 16, 2020, I announced Guidelines for Opening Up America Again, a framework for safely re-opening the country and putting millions of Americans back to work.

Just as we continue to battle COVID-19 itself, so too must we now join together to overcome the effects the virus has had on our economy. Success will require the efforts not only of the Federal Government, but also of every State, tribe, territory, and locality; of businesses, non-profits, and houses of worship; and of the American people. To aid those efforts, agencies must continue to remove barriers to the greatest engine of economic prosperity the world has ever known: the innovation, initiative, and drive of the American people.

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Policy. It is the policy of the United States to combat the economic consequences of COVID-19 with the same vigor and resourcefulness with which the fight against COVID-19 itself has been waged. Agencies should address this economic emergency by rescinding, modifying, waiving, or providing exemptions from regulations and other requirements that may inhibit economic recovery, consistent with applicable law and with protection of the public health and safety, with national and homeland security, and with budgetary priorities and operational feasibility. They should also give businesses, especially small businesses, the confidence they need to re-open by providing guidance on what the law requires; by recognizing the efforts of businesses to comply with often-complex regulations in complicated and swiftly changing circumstances; and by committing to fairness in administrative enforcement and adjudication.

Sec. 2. Definitions. (a) “Emergency authorities” means any statutory or regulatory authorities or exceptions that authorize action in an emergency, in exigent circumstances, for good cause, or in similar situations.
(b) “Agency” has the meaning given in section 3502 of title 44, United States Code.
(c) “Administrative enforcement” includes investigations, assertions of statutory or regulatory violations, and adjudications by adjudicators as defined herein.
(d) “Adjudicator” means an agency official who makes a determination that has legal consequence, as defined in section 2(d) of Executive Order 13892 of October 9, 2019 (Promoting the Rule of Law Through Transparency and Fairness in Civil Administrative Enforcement and Adjudication), for a person, except that it does not mean the head of an agency, a member of a multi-member board that heads an agency, or a Presidential appointee.
(e) “Pre-enforcement ruling” has the meaning given it in section 2(f) of Executive Order 13892.
(f) “Regulatory standard” includes any requirement imposed on the public by a Federal regulation, as defined in section 2(g) of Executive Order 13892, or any recommendation, best practice, standard, or other, similar provision of a Federal guidance document as defined in section 2(c) of Executive Order 13892.
(g) “Unfair surprise” has the meaning given it in section 2(e) of Executive Order 13892.

Sec. 3. Federal Response. The heads of all agencies are directed to use, to the fullest extent possible and consistent with applicable law, any emergency authorities that I have previously invoked in response to the COVID-19 outbreak or that are otherwise available to them to support the economic response to the COVID-19 outbreak. The heads of all agencies are also encouraged to promote economic recovery through non-regulatory actions.

Sec. 4. Rescission and waiver of regulatory standards. The heads of all agencies shall identify regulatory standards that may inhibit economic recovery and shall consider taking appropriate action, consistent with applicable law, including by issuing proposed rules as necessary, to temporarily or permanently rescind, modify, waive, or exempt persons or entities from those requirements, and to consider exercising appropriate temporary enforcement discretion or appropriate temporary extensions of time as provided for in enforceable agreements with respect to those requirements, for the purpose of promoting job creation and economic growth, insofar as doing so is consistent with the law and with the policy considerations identified in section 1 of this order.

Sec. 5. Compliance assistance for regulated entities. (a) The heads of all agencies, excluding the Department of Justice, shall accelerate procedures by which a regulated person or entity may receive a pre-enforcement ruling under Executive Order 13892 with respect to whether proposed conduct in response to the COVID-19 outbreak, including any response to legislative or executive economic stimulus actions, is consistent with statutes and regulations administered by the agency, insofar as doing so is consistent with the law and with the policy considerations identified in section 1 of this order.
Pre‑enforcement rulings under this subsection may be issued without regard to the requirements of section 6(a) of Executive Order 13892.
(b) The heads of all agencies shall consider whether to formulate, and make public, policies of enforcement discretion that, as permitted by law and as appropriate in the context of particular statutory and regulatory programs and the policy considerations identified in section 1 of this order, decline enforcement against persons and entities that have attempted in reasonable good faith to comply with applicable statutory and regulatory standards, including those persons and entities acting in conformity with a pre-enforcement ruling.
(c) As a result of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the Department of Health and Human Services, including through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and other agencies have issued, or plan to issue in the future, guidance on action suggested to stem the transmission and spread of that disease. In formulating any policies of enforcement discretion undersubsection (b) of this section, an agency head should consider a situation in which a person or entity makes a reasonable attempt to comply with such guidance, which the person or entity reasonably deems applicable to its circumstances, to be a rationale for declining enforcement under subsection (b) of this section. Non-adherence to guidance shall not by itself form the basis for an enforcement action by a Federal agency.
Sec. 6. Fairness in Administrative Enforcement and Adjudication. The heads of all agencies shall consider the principles of fairness in administrative enforcement and adjudication listed below, and revise their procedures and practices in light of them, consistent with applicable law and as they deem appropriate in the context of particular statutory and regulatory programs and the policy considerations identified in section 1 of this order.
(a) The Government should bear the burden of proving an alleged violation of law; the subject of enforcement should not bear the burden of proving compliance.
(b) Administrative enforcement should be prompt and fair.
(c) Administrative adjudicators should be independent of enforcement staff.
(d) Consistent with any executive branch confidentiality interests, the Government should provide favorable relevant evidence in possession of the agency to the subject of an administrative enforcement action.
(e) All rules of evidence and procedure should be public, clear, and effective.
(f) Penalties should be proportionate, transparent, and imposed in adherence to consistent standards and only as authorized by law.
(g) Administrative enforcement should be free of improper Government coercion.
(h) Liability should be imposed only for violations of statutes or duly issued regulations, after notice and an opportunity to respond.
(i) Administrative enforcement should be free of unfair surprise.

(j) Agencies must be accountable for their administrative enforcement decisions.
Sec. 7. Review of Regulatory Response. The heads of all agencies shall review any regulatory standards they have temporarily rescinded, suspended, modified, or waived during the public health emergency, any such actions they take pursuant to section 4 of this order, and other regulatory flexibilities they have implemented in response to COVID-19, whether before or after issuance of this order, and determine which, if any, would promote economic recovery if made permanent, insofar as doing so is consistent with the policy considerations identified in section 1 of this order, and report the results of such review to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy, and the Assistant to the President for Economic Policy.
Sec. 8. Implementation. The Director of the Office of Management and Budget, in consultation with the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy and the Assistant to the President for Economic Policy, shall monitor compliance with this order and may also issue memoranda providing guidance for implementing this order, including by setting deadlines for the reviews and reports required under section 7 of this order.
Sec. 9. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision in this order, nothing in this order shall apply to any action that pertains to foreign or military affairs, or to a national security or homeland security function of the United States (other than procurement actions and actions involving the import or export of non-defense articles and services).
(d) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
White House Logo
The White House
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUD_wvkNhnk
PREMIERE
Garbage 'Science': Be Wary Of What You're Being Told
•Premiere in progress. Started 48 minutes ago

Peak Prosperity

Man, with the major pandemic and economic risks we all have to deal with, it's so frustrating to have to waste time and energy addressing the plague of crap 'science' being dumped on us on a daily basis. It's so unnecessary.

Our society knows how to do science well. But due to Big Pharma protecting its profits, or political agendas, or whatever the reasons may be -- we are not getting rigorous trustworthy research findings at a time when we need them most.

Yet once again, we're find ourselves forced to wade back in the hydroxychloroquine debate. This time to respond to (or more accurately, eviscerate) the most recent study on HCQ appearing in The Lancet. Whether or not its conclusions are accurate, who knows? But its methodology is for certain shoddy as hell.

Why are we still being given such poorly-constructed and shoddy results by our science 'experts'? By this time, we should have a plethora of rigorous, peer-reviewed studies giving us clear, dependable answers we can use to create smart health policy decisions. But instead, we're still being fed a daily diet of garbage 'science':

________________________ LINKS FROM THIS VIDEO: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/la... https://www.theguardian.com/world/202... https://codeblue.galencentre.org/2020... https://twitter.com/Arkancideisreal/s... https://www.theguardian.com/science/2... https://melwy.com/blog/lancet-paper-o... http://covexit.com/yale-epidemiology-...
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6WGPGwii9I
2:18:30 min
Live Stream
•Streamed live 4 hours ago

Doctor Mike Hansen

Interview with a PhD in carbohydrate chemistry - conversation "about blood sugar and possible effects and impacts in patients with Coronvirus. We know adequate blood sugar levels are important to the functioning of our brain. The neurons & astrocytes of the brains need sugar for the functioning of the brain. A patient with symptoms caused by coronavirus. It is exposed to reduced levels of oxygen in the blood and infection in the lungs. Consequently, blood sugar levels tend to rise; and causes longer infection time in the patients. It would be advisable for patients critical of the coronavirus to maintain stable blood sugar levels. I understand, by reducing blood sugar levels (adequate levels); infection can be controlled in addition to the use of possible antibiotics. Again, you are appreciated for your valuable time. Notice! I am not a health professional."
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

In a twist, SF extends stay-at-home order, but announces reopening plan
By Christien Kafton and Aja Seldon

SAN FRANCISCO (KTVU) - San Francisco is chartering its own course on how to reopen, differentiating itself from the five Bay Area counties it once stood aligned with on how to move forward in the COVID-19 fight.

Mayor London Breed announced at a news conference on Thursday that the city's current stay-at-home order, which was set to expire on Sunday, would be extended "indefinitely." Yet at the same time, Breed announced a tentative schedule for loosening restrictions on restaurants, hair salons, gyms and other businesses that have been shut for months.

On June 15, the city hopes to allow outdoor fitness camps and yoga to resume with social distancing. There are also plans for outdoor dining, indoor shopping, sporting events, and religious services to continue.

blob:https://www.facebook.com/4dd4b123-7be0-47ad-bf5e-79e2d88c0638 34:58 min

San Francisco set a target date of July 13 to allow for indoor dining, hair salons, and barber shops to reopen.

The city is eyeing mid-August for entering into Phase 3 of its reopening plan, which would permit gyms and fitness centers to restart operations along with tattoo parlors and nail salons. Movie theaters, bowling alleys, and bars could also open, but in a limited capacity.

Public health officials said those dates could change based on COVID-19 data indicators such as an increase in infections, hospitalizations, and deaths.

With San Francisco gradually reopening up more sectors and allowing for some activities to restart, city leaders are tightening restrictions around wearing face masks. Breed asked that people wear masks outside if they within 30 feet of others.

The new timeline for reopening and shelter-in-place order shows San Francisco breaking further from its close coordination with the other Bay Area counties.
Early on in the COVID-19 crisis, health officers for the counties of San Francisco, Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, San Mateo, Santa Clara, and the City of Berkeley, were mostly in agreement on how to combat the virus. But the virus has posed a unique set of challenges for each county, with some counties being hit harder than others.

Breed said because Bay Area counties are so closely connected and intertwined, county health officers worked together to try and make decisions that were in the best interest of public health.

"In San Francisco for example, you don't just have to live here to be impacted. People come from all over the Bay Area who work in this city," Breed said. Adding, "But we also realize San Francisco is more of a dense city than other places. But also we see our numbers and the data is a lot different."

Public Health Director Dr. Grant Colfax said it was time the city tailored its health orders and guidelines specifically for its region.
 

MinnesotaSmith

Membership Revoked

Sex workers recommend ‘reverse cowgirl’ to prevent spread of coronavirus
By Ben Cost
May 26, 2020


Swiss sex workers draft new guidelines for making love in the time of corona

Swiss sex workers draft new guidelines for making love in the time of corona

"Call it the corona sutra.

Enterprising Swiss sex workers have devised some inventive ways for their colleagues to service clients sans spreading the coronavirus — by doing the deed “doggy style” and “reverse cowgirl.” The opportunistic courtesans drafted the guidelines in hopes that Switzerland will lift the temporary ban on prostitution enacted two months ago over COVID-19 concerns, reports Swiss media outlet Watson.

Both aforementioned sexual positions allow for a safe distance between faces during hanky-panky, according to sex-worker advocacy group ProKoRe in Switzerland, where prostitution is legal. They claim that flesh peddlers can reduce the likelihood of contracting or transmitting the virus via water droplets that are inherent in going at it missionary style (face-to-face).

In March, New York City officials released guidelines for pandemic sex, declaring masturbation is the safest way to avoid the coronavirus and denouncing sex acts like “rim jobs.” Healthline cautioned against hooking up with strangers in a recent article on making love in the time of corona.

Currently, there’s no evidence that having sex in the “doggy style” or “reverse cowgirl” positions can mitigate the risk of contracting COVID-19, which can travel as far as 13 feet. Other proposed COVID-avoiding measures include airing out rooms for at least 15 minutes after each steamy session, washing bed sheets at a temperature of at least 60 degrees and requiring call girls to wear face masks while working.

And if that wasn’t kinky enough, hookups should be limited to 15 minutes, and the brothel must keep a record of the customer’s contact info for a full month, per the guidelines.

In the bill, ProKoRe implores Switzerland to lift lockdowns as a matter of emergency, citing that Switzerland’s prostitution hole is currently being filled by clandestine courtesan rings, reports Watson.

Swiss skin merchants aren’t the only ones struggling to stay afloat during lockdown. Adult-content creators claim they’re getting booted from subscription platform OnlyFans as the site goes more mainstream. Meanwhile, non-essential business closures have forced one Nevada sex worker to offer her services as a virtual girlfriend in exchange for groceries and Amazon gift cards."
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-OtEU0RDX28
28:52 min
China passes controversial HK law;Chinese scientist stole $1billion trade secrets;2nd virus outbreak
•Premiered 6 hours ago

China in Focus - NTD


After Beijing passed the draconian Hong Kong law, the US might revoke Hong Kong’s ‘special status.’ What implications does it bring? An expert tells us China’s move to rein in Hong Kong is not an impulse, but years in the making.

A city of nearly 3 million in China’s Heilongjiang province braces for a second wave of coronavirus cases. Several neighborhoods now locked down.

Rising tensions over continuing clashes between troops at the disputed Indo-China border. Concerns of escalation as the military builds up on both sides.

Twitter recently adding fact check labels to two of president Trump’s tweets. And after pressure, also added warning labels to two of China’s foreign ministry spokesperson, Zhao Lijian’s, tweets on the virus origin.

And the FBI issued a statement on a Chinese scientist who pleaded guilty to stealing $1B worth of trade secrets from an American company.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Coronavirus patients can safely see others within 10 days of symptoms starting if they've improved or been fever-free for three days, CDC's new guidelines say

By Mary Kekatos
Published: 10:54 EDT, 27 May 2020 | Updated: 11:53 EDT, 27 May 2020

  • People who had the coronavirus are allowed to meet with others after they've gone at least three days with no fever, new CDC guidelines say
  • They can also safely see each other if it's been 10 days since they first noticed symptoms
  • The CDC says this doesn't replace other practices such as good hand hygiene and social distancing
  • In the US, there are more than 1.6 million confirmed cases of the virus and more than 98,000 deaths
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has updated its guidelines for when people who have had the novel coronavirus can safely see others.

According to the new recommendations, patients are allowed to meet with others after they've gone at least three days with no fever.

Additionally, their symptoms need to have improved and at least 10 days need to have passed since they first noticed symptoms.

The updated guidelines come as states begin to reopen their economies and people begin considering going back to work and school.

The CDC says people who test positive for the virus are still contagious so waiting 10 days helps symptoms pass.

'People with conditions that weaken their immune system might need to stay home longer than 10 days,' the federal health agency said.

If you are exposed to someone who had a confirmed case of the virus, then you must stay home for at least 14 days to see if symptoms develop.

'Depending on your healthcare provider's advice and availability of testing, you might get tested to see if you still have COVID-19,' the CDC wrote.

'If you will be tested, you can be around others when you have no fever, symptoms have improved, and you receive two negative test results in a row, at least 24 hours apart.'

However, not having symptoms or testing negative isn't a substitution for practices including social distancing and good hand hygiene.

'Limit touching frequently touched surfaces such as kiosks, digital interfaces such as touchscreens and fingerprint scanners, ticket machines, turnstiles, handrails, restroom surfaces, elevator buttons, and benches as much as possible,' the CDC wrote.

'If you must touch these surfaces, as soon as you can, wash your hands for 20 seconds with soap and water or rub your hands with sanitizer containing 60% alcohol,' it adds.

The agency also advises using contactless payment and trash cans with foot pedals whenever possible.

If you are using a taxi or a ride share, the CDC recommends opening windows to improve air circulation in the vehicle.

'Limit the number of passengers in the vehicle to only those necessary,' the agency suggests.

'Avoid pooled rides or rides where multiple passengers are picked up who are not in the same household. Sit in the back seat in larger vehicles such as vans and buses so you can remain at least six feet away from the driver.'

If you are taking public transit, the CDC advises riding during off-peak hours, traveling six feet apart and frequent hand cleaning.

In the US, there are more than 1.6 million confirmed cases of the virus and more than 98,000 deaths.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Measuring coronavirus genes in sewage can predict spikes in cases up to a WEEK before cities see upticks in positive tests
By Natalie Rahhal
Published: 18:02 EDT, 27 May 2020 | Updated: 22:39 EDT, 27 May 2020
  • Yale University researchers measured concentrations of coronavirus genetic material in sewage daily for about a month-and-a-half in New Haven
  • Coronavirus was found in every sample of wastewater they analyzed
  • Levels of the virus in sewage peaked 3 days before the Connecticut city hit its peak of hospitalizations
  • They also hit their high point a week before the number of cases peaked
  • It suggests public health officials could use sewage as a cheaper predictor of emerging outbreaks as cities across the US begin to reopen
Monitoring sewage for high concentrations of coronavirus genetic material might help officials predict new outbreaks up to seven days early, new research suggests.

Scientists have recently confirmed that while spit and mucus from coughs and sneezes are the main ways that coronavirus is transmitted, humans also 'shed' the virus in feces.

Yale University scientists have been carefully studying a waste treatment facility in New Haven, Connecticut for signs of the virus for about a month-and-a-half.

The found spikes in levels of genetic material in sewage preceded similar increases in positive coronavirus tests in the area as well as upticks in hospitalizations.

As the US begins to reopen, poop monitoring programs might help cities prepare for resurgences of the virus that many public health experts worry are all but inevitable as people emerge from isolation and come into contact with one another.

Between March 19 and May 20, the Yale researchers tested samples of sludge from a treatment facility in New Haven that processes wastewater for about 200,000 residents of the city.

Simultaneously, they tracked how hospital admissions and positive tests in the city went up or down each day.

They're the latest in a series of research groups in the US and abroad to look to sewage as a metric for coronavirus outbreaks.

Efforts to track case, hospitalization and death increases and declines in cities and states are crucial, especially as localities begin to reopen.

The continued spread of coronavirus is all but certain, but if there are marked surges in these counts, they will serve as a warning sign that a larger outbreak may be in progress, triggering lockdowns to resume so that hospitals don't get overwhelmed.

But the US has struggled to keep up with case increases especially, due to testing delays and flawed tests.

That may mean that it's too late to stop community transmission by the time a notable increase in positive COVID-19 test results.

So experts are eager to find alternative, early signals of rising case loads in communities.

pic1.jpg
The viral load of sewage (red) peaked a week earlier than did the number of new daily coronavirus infections in New Haven (black), the study found

pic2.jpg
Similarly, the height of coronavirus concentration in sampled sludge came three days sooner than the height of hospital admissions for COVID-19 in the Connecticut city

Poop may hold the solution to the problem.

When someone is infected with a virus the 'shed' it, meaning that traces of the virus's genetic material (RNA, in the case of coronavirus) are present in cells that leave their bodies in various ways.

People with coronavirus shed it in saliva and mucus that enter the environment via coughs and sneezes and also shed it in their feces.

Importantly, fecal viral shedding of coronavirus begins before people show symptoms.

The researchers found that every single sample of sludge they took contained coronavirus RNA.

In New Haven, the number of people hospitalized for coronavirus peaked on April 12.

But the levels of of the virus detected in sewage peaked on April 9 - three days sooner.

And the peak number of cases in the city could be predicted even earlier with sewage.

Levels in sludge hit their height on April 9, where as cases peaked on April 16.

What's more, declines in cases and hospitalizations were similarly preceded by declining coronavirus concentrations in sewage, according to a copy of the study, which has not yet been peer-reviewed, published on MedRxiv.org.

'Our study could have substantial policy implications,' the researchers wrote.

'Jurisdictions can use primary sludge SARS-CoV-2 concentrations to preempt community outbreak dynamics or provide an additional basis for easing restrictions, especially when there are limitations in clinical testing.

'Raw wastewater and sludge-based surveillance is particularly useful for low and middle-income countries where clinical testing capacity is limited.'

~~~~~~~

see: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.19.20105999v1.full.pdf
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
MORE ON THIS

(fair use applies)

Wastewater testing gains traction as a Covid-19 early warning system
By Sharon Begley
May 28, 2020

What only a month ago had been merely an intriguing laboratory finding about analyzing wastewater to detect the virus that causes Covid-19 has quickly leapt to the threshold of real-world use.

With swab tests still plagued by capacity issues, inaccuracy, and slow turnaround, testing wastewater for the novel coronavirus’ genetic signature could give communities a faster way to spot a rebound in cases — as soon as this fall.

“There is real hope that this can be a sensitive, early warning” if, as officials ease social distancing measures, Covid-19 begins to spread again, said Peter Grevatt, CEO of the nonprofit Water Research Foundation. “Several labs have achieved a proof-of-concept in terms of demonstrating the ability to detect the RNA [genetic material] of the virus in wastewater.” Studies in the U.S. and the Netherlands, among others, have shown you can pick up a signal about a week before the first clinical case.

Grevatt and his colleagues briefed congressional staffers last week on the potential for wastewater analysis to be the canary in the Covid-19 coal mine, and on Wednesday the National Academies’ Water Science and Technology Board hosted a panel discussion on how to build a surveillance network and what additional research is needed to make it work. Water utilities from southeastern Virginia to Portland, Ore., are already conducting the analysis on their own. And by next week, Grevatt’s group will have identified the labs that will participate in a quality control test deemed crucial for rolling out a nationwide effort to analyze wastewater for coronavirus: The foundation will send wastewater samples gathered by several utilities to all participating labs and have them run the analysis, compare results, and agree on best practices.

“We hope to have results of this lab-to-lab comparison by the end of the summer,” Grevatt said.

Countries are not waiting for every scientific question to be answered. Finland, Germany, and the Netherlands have already launched national wastewater surveillance programs to catch any resurgence of Covid-19. “People are already starting to scale this up,” environmental engineer David Sedlak of the University of California, Berkeley, told the Academies’ panel.

The stakes are enormous. As states ease social distancing, they need to know if they are reopening too quickly. If they can’t detect a surge of cases until patients show up in emergency rooms, it could be too late to prevent a repeat of this spring, when hospitals in New York City and elsewhere were overwhelmed. If, as many hope, the country makes it through the summer with a “flattened curve” — keeping cases below the number that hospitals can handle — then it will be crucial to be on high alert for any second wave in the fall.

Otherwise, the body count will rise and the nation could face another economically crippling shutdown.

“It’s tremendously important to get this right,” Grevatt said. “These are life-and-death questions.” And although more research is needed to figure out if, for instance, the amount of virus in stool and therefore wastewater varies with the severity of disease, “this has the potential to be implemented in the current pandemic.”

“Wastewater epidemiology” has been used for decades to detect polio in countries where the disease remains endemic and, more recently, to estimate the prevalence of opioid abuse in U.S. communities.

“We know that SARS-CoV-2 [the virus that causes Covid-19] is shed in stool, which means it can be collected in sewage systems,” said Megan Murray of the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. In small studies so far, the detection of the new coronavirus in sewage samples “has correlated very nicely with the arrival of Covid-19 into different communities,” she added, including picking up “significant amounts of viral material” in Boston sewage weeks before cases arrived in March.

In addition to detecting cases sooner, wastewater analysis can also get around the well-known limitations of the swab tests used to detect Covid-19. If the test (which looks for the virus’ genes) is given to 100 infected people, it will miss about 67 if they are four days after infection and 38 if they are on the first day of experiencing symptoms, incorrectly pronouncing them virus-free, Johns Hopkins researchers reported this month in Annals of Internal Medicine.

And although Covid-19 testing in the U.S. has become more available and faster, testing capacity is still nowhere near enough to test everyone every few days, which would be necessary to, for instance, safely re-open schools and workplaces.

“Wastewater offers the opportunity to provide near real-time trend data to evaluate the impact of policymaking,” such as re-opening the economy, said Mariana Matus, CEO and co-founder of Boston-based Biobot Analytics. It can provide “early warning for second waves, and the opportunity to mass-test up to 75% of the U.S. population on a regular basis at a fraction of the cost of clinical testing.”

Getting even a weeklong head start on detecting cases can make a huge difference. If the U.S. had begun imposing social distancing measures one week earlier than it did in March, the death toll by early May would have been 36,000 lower, Columbia University researchers calculated this month. Two weeks earlier would have averted 54,000 deaths.

Biobot is working with about 400 water facilities in 42 states to see if wastewater epidemiology for Covid-19 in the real world can live up to the hopes inspired by early lab tests. (Many of the utilities are also running their own, independent tests.) When it analyzed wastewater from a Massachusetts plant from March 18 to 25, it found high levels of several telltale SARS-CoV-2 genes.

Although that indicated that some number of people had Covid-19, it wasn’t clear how many. Biobot’s analysis “can distinguish between 10 and 100 [cases],” Matus said, “but we are running experiments to get more precise estimates.”

Doing that should be at the top of the research agenda, Grevatt said: “Work is moving in a direction where you may be able to count the cases in a community, but we aren’t there yet.” To get there, scientists must figure out when during the course of infection people shed virus in stool, whether the amount of viral shedding is the same in severe and mild or even asymptomatic cases, and whether the quality of an area’s water — mineral content, industrial effluent, and other components — affect the detection of viral genes.

They’d also like to know where, in the water treatment facility, is the best place to sample for the coronavirus. On Tuesday, scientists in Spain reported a preliminary answer: remnants of virus, including its genes, tend to collect at the “sludge line” in the large settling tanks that separate solids and liquid.

Even if wastewater analysis can’t yet quantify cases, it can detect when their prevalence changes. Scientists in France reported that the rise and fall of confirmed infections in Paris correlated with the amount of virus detected in sewage from March 5 to April 23 (France’s lockdown began on March 17). “Viral genomes could be detected before the beginning of the exponential growth of the epidemic,” the scientists found, and “a marked decrease in [viral RNA] was observed” as case numbers fell.

That and other studies show that “you can track changes like those we’re seeing right now in many communities” as they ease social distancing, Grevatt said. “There are many areas of the country, especially rural ones, that may not even have an infection yet. Wastewater analysis can tell them when they do,” days before someone shows up sick.

Utilities aren’t waiting for every research question to be answered. Oregon’s Clean Water Services, a utility that serves 613,000 people west of Portland, is part of Biobot’s network, sending weekly samples to the company. It is also doing its own research, trying to answer key questions such as how rain affects viral concentration, said Ken Williamson, director of regulatory affairs.

Engineers at the Southern Nevada Water Authority found high levels of five SARS-CoV-2 genes in samples taken around March 9, which lines up with when the state has its first confirmed case, said civil engineer Dan Gerrity of the authority and the University of Nevada Las Vegas. They found a peak in late March and early April, with ups and downs through late May — also mimicking reported case counts.

Hampton Roads Sanitation District in southeastern Virginia started sampling for SARS-CoV-2 on March 11 “to look at trends and estimate what prevalence might look like,” said Jim Pletl, director of water quality for the utility. Cost: $70,000 for an automated RNA extractor (to get the genetic material out of cells), $70,000 for a digital PCR machine (to identify the genes), and $100 per sample.

For its inter-lab study, the Water Research Foundation will see if the analyses agree, hoping to come up with best practices that can guide nationwide implementation as soon as this fall. “That,” Grevatt said, “is going to be important for the scientific credibility of this approach.”
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Hepatitis drug is being tested to treat mild coronavirus cases in the hopes it can help ramp up the immune system to fight the infection

By Mary Kekatos
Published: 15:41 EDT, 27 May 2020 | Updated: 01:08 EDT, 28 May 2020
  • Interferon-lambda is a man-made form of a naturally occurring protein that calls for immune cells to attack a virus and is mainly used to treat hepatitis patients
  • Receptors for the drug are found in the linings of the lungs and intestine - the main areas where COVID-19 attacks - and the liver
  • Stanford is recruiting 120 participants, half of whom will be given a single injection of interferon-lambda, and the other half a placebo
  • Researchers want to see if the drug can keep patients with mild coronavirus cases out of the hospital and stop the virus from shedding
A clinical trial is underway to test if a drug for hepatitis works as an experimental treatment against the novel coronavirus.

Interferon-lambda is a man-made form of a naturally occurring protein that helps bring respiratory diseases under control by calling immune system cells to the infection site.

Researchers from Stanford Medicine want to see if the medication helps patients recover faster and reduces viral shedding so the pathogen doesn't spread to others.

With no vaccines yet, or treatments that are approved outside of emergency use, the team says the drug could help limit the spread of the highly-contagious virus.

According to Stanford, interferon-lambda issues a 'call in the troops' command so immune cells can fight off diseases.

Receptors for the drug are found in the linings of the lungs and intestine - the main areas where COVID-19 attacks - and the liver.

Most experimental treatments are being studied in hospitalized patients, but researchers want to see if interferon-lambda can help avoid the need for hospitalization.

Investigators are recruiting 120 participants who have been diagnosed with mild cases of coronavirus.

Patients will either be given single skin-deep injections of interferon-lambda or of a placebo and if the virus sheds.

'Even though these individuals may not need hospitalization, infection with COVID-19 results in respiratory symptoms and lost productivity,' co-lead author Dr Upinder Singh, a professor of infectious diseases and of microbiology and immunology at Stanford School of Medicine, said in a statement.

'Plus - and this is important - patients with mild disease contribute to community disease transmission.

'Limiting viral shedding from this group would reduce transmission to family members and others, which is crucial to controlling epidemic disease spread.'

Interferon-lambda is also sometimes used to treat cancer, but it isn't the only drug being tested as an experimental treatment.

Chimerix, a company based in North Carolina is planning a clinical trial to test if drug derived from the blood thinner heparin for a form of leukemia reduces bleeding and inflammation in coronavirus patients.

Additionally, Massachusetts-based Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc is studying if selinexor, a drug used to treat a rare type of bone marrow cancer, can keep the virus from replicating throughout the body.

In the US, there are more than 1.6 million confirmed cases of the virus and more than 98,000 deaths.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

EVERY recovered COVID-19 patient develops 'neutralizing' antibodies to the virus - but they may not be enough to block reinfection, small study suggests

By Mary Kekatos
Published: 17:54 EDT, 27 May 2020 | Updated: 04:05 EDT, 28 May 2020

  • Researchers looked at 149 recovered coronavirus who donated plasma, which is supposed to contain virus-fighting antibodies
  • About 79% had low levels of antibodies in their blood but 1% of 'elite donors' had very high levels
  • The team concluded that every patient's immune system is capable of producing the types of antibodies that neutralize the virus, just not enough of them
  • In the US, there are more than 1.6 million confirmed cases of the virus and nearly 100,000 deaths
Most people who recover from the novel coronavirus generate at least some antibodies capable of neutralizing SARS-CoV-2, the first round of results from a new study suggest.

While many antibodies grab hold of the virus, only a few counteract the pathogen and prevent it from entering our cells.

Researchers from Rockefeller University in New York City looked at 149 recovered patients and determined that the majority had a weak antibody response.

However, they found that every patient's immune system seemed to be capable of generating the types of antibodies that neutralize the virus, just not particularly enough of them.

'This suggests just about everybody can do this, which is very good news for vaccines,' Dr Michel C Nussenzweig, head of the Laboratory of Molecular Immunology at Rockefeller, said in a statement.

'It means if you were able to create a vaccine that elicits these particular antibodies, then the vaccine is likely to be effective and work for a lot of people.'

For the study, published on pre-peer review site bioRxiv.org, the team looked at 149 people who donated plasma at The Rockefeller Hospital in New York City over the course of five weeks.

Convalescent plasma is the liquid portion of blood is taken from a recovered coronavirus patient, which contains antibodies and immune B-cells.

Participants had symptoms of the virus for about 12 days while infected, and their first symptoms occurred about 39 days before they donated plasma.

Researchers then mixed the plasma with a pseudo coronavirus and measured if or how well the virus would infect human cells in a petri dish.

Most samples did not do very well at neutralizing the virus.

In fact, the neutralizing effect was undetectable in 33 percent of donors. The investigators say this may be because their immune systems cleared the infection before antibodies could be produced.

They found that the effect was very high among one percent of patients, so-called 'elite donors.'

The team identified 40 antibodies that neutralized the virus, and focused on three that did so even at low levels.

These antibodies bound to at least three sites on the spike protein found on the surface of the coronavirus that it uses to enter our cells.

Researchers now plan to clone these antibodies in hopes it will help patients with severe or life-threatening cases of the virus.

'We now know what an effective antibody looks like and we have found similar ones in more than one person,' Robbiani said.

'This is important information for people who are designing and testing vaccines. If they see their vaccine can elicit these antibodies, they know they are on the right track.'

In the the US, there are more than 1.6 million confirmed of the virus and more than 99,000 deaths.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Here’s How Wearing a Cloth Mask Helps Fight the Spread of Coronavirus
It's all about protecting others

May 13, 2020
CLEVELAND CLINIC

One big change as a result of the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic is the increased use of masks in public. As the outbreak continues and parts of the country reopen, many localities and businesses are suggesting, even requiring, the wearing of masks or other types of face coverings to help prevent the spread of the virus.

While medical-grade masks such as the N-95 mask provide the best protection against the spread, they’re hard to find and are mostly reserved for use by front-line healthcare workers. So many of us are wearing homemade masks — whether made ourselves or via friends or Etsy — made from cloth or even improvised masks made from scarves or bandannas.

But how effective are they in protecting you from the virus while wearing one? And how can they protect those around you?

We asked Steven Gordon, MD, Chairman of Cleveland Clinic’s Department of Infectious Disease, and pulmonologist Raed Dweik, MD, Chairman of Cleveland Clinic’s Respiratory Institute, about the science around these masks and why wearing them is important.

How masks protect us

Dr. Dweik confirms that those homemade masks, often made of material like cotton, won’t do much to protect you from inhaling particles that carry the virus. But they do protect wearers from possibly spreading the virus to others.

“There is evidence that such masks reduce the exhaled aerosols from infectious, but asymptomatic, individuals.” he says. By blocking the exhale of virus particles in to the air around you, your mask is keeping the virus from spreading.

Additionally, the masks serve as a really helpful physical barrier when you cough or sneeze. “Those actions can propel this cloud of droplets from you up to 25 or 26 feet,” he says. Your mask can “disrupt” that cloud and keep those virus particles from traveling.

Studies support masks

As for how we know this, Dr. Dweik explains, ”Our normal exhaled breath consists of tiny water droplets and fluid from the lining of the lungs that carries dissolved bacteria, viruses, proteins, metabolites and other compounds. As they enter the air, the aerosols begin to dry and, ultimately, only the dissolved materials remain.”

According to a pair of recently published journal articles, he says, those particles and materials collect on the inside of your mask and form a layer which attracts more particles. The studies showed that even after the masks had dried, those dissolved materials were still on the mask.

Both studies found that masks captured a wide range of proteins that are actually smaller than coronavirus particles, meaning, says Dr. Dweik, it’s reasonable to assume the masks are also capturing those larger coronavirus particles.

The importance of masks

As businesses reopen and employees return to work, masks can play a pivotal role in helping block the spread of the virus, especially from asymptomatic carriers. The more people in a given space wearing masks, the less viral particles are making it into the space around them, decreasing exposure and risk.

Not that they’re a total fix. As Dr. Gordon notes, “The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) says masks potentially help prevent transmission when used as a complement to social distancing.”

Masks, he says, should be used in conjunction with social distancing, not as a replacement of that practice.
 

Plain Jane

Just Plain Jane
WOW! I had to scroll to page 2 to post the PA update. First time ever!


COVID-19 Data for Pennsylvania*
* Map, tables, case counts and deaths last updated at 12:00 p.m. on 5/29/2020
Source: Pennsylvania National Electronic Disease Surveillance System (PA-NEDSS) as of 12:00 a.m. on 5/29/2020
Page last updated: 12:00 p.m. on 5/29/2020


View the beta version of the Pennsylvania COVID-19 Dashboard.



Case Counts, Deaths, and Negatives
Total Cases*DeathsNegative**Recovered***
70,7355,464366,97065%


* Total case counts include confirmed and probable cases.
** Negative case data only includes negative PCR tests. Negative case data does not include negative antibody tests.
*** Individuals who have recovered is determined using a calculation, similar to what is being done by several other states. If a case has not been reported as a death, and it is more than 30 days past the date of their first positive test (or onset of symptoms) then an individual is considered recovered.


Confirmed CasesProbable Case by Definition and High-Risk ExposureProbable Case by Serology Test and Either Symptoms or High-Risk Exposure
68,7651,970604


Hospital Data
Trajectory Animations


Positive Cases by Age Range to Date
Age RangePercent of Cases*
0-4< 1%
5-12< 1%
13-182%
19-246%
25-4937%
50-6425%
65+28%
* Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding


Hospitalization Rates by Age Range to Date


Age RangePercent of Cases*
0-4< 1%
5-12< 1%
13-18< 1%
19-241%
25-4916%
50-6426%
65+56%


* Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding


Death Data



County Case Counts to Date
CountyTotal CasesNegatives
Adams2413011
Allegheny187029539
Armstrong621226
Beaver5823637
Bedford 39753
Berks398811392
Blair492723
Bradford461511
Bucks501219098
Butler2273672
Cambria573692
Cameron2125
Carbon2342307
Centre1512045
Chester260712144
Clarion26671
Clearfield381079
Clinton55578
Columbia3461308
Crawford301065
Cumberland6215000
Dauphin12319901
Delaware637920165
Elk6317
Erie2534776
Fayette953207
Forest778
Franklin7625080
Fulton15224
Greene27761
Huntingdon228835
Indiana901367
Jefferson7504
Juniata95334
Lackawanna15286086
Lancaster310515609
Lawrence761285
Lebanon9504506
Lehigh373813885
Luzerne271110658
Lycoming1622229
McKean12584
Mercer1071546
Mifflin581213
Monroe13155801
Montgomery690633577
Montour503217
Northampton304513061
Northumberland1861388
Perry56728
Philadelphia1815656668
Pike4761984
Potter4142
Schuylkill6164845
Snyder39392
Somerset371753
Sullivan394
Susquehanna109765
Tioga17561
Union571100
Venango8541
Warren3371
Washington1394227
Wayne1191004
Westmoreland4449075
Wyoming34468
York99113482


Incidence by County


Incidence%20by%20County.png

Incidence is calculated by dividing the current number of confirmed and probable COVID-19 cases reported to the Department by the 2018 county population data available from the Bureau of Health Statistics. The counties are divided into 6 relatively equally-sized groups based on their incidence rate (i.e. sestiles). Cases are determined using a national COVID-19 case definition. There currently is no way to estimate the true number of infected persons. Incidence rates are based on the number of known cases, not the number of true infected persons.


Case Counts by Sex to Date




SexPositive Cases Percent of Cases*
Female38,73955%
Male31,29244%
Neither30%
Not reported7011%
* Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding

Case Counts by Race to Date*



RacePositive CasesPercent of Cases**
African American/Black863212%
Asian10111%
White19,39927%
Other4171%
Not reported41,27658%
* 58% of race is not reported. Little data is available on ethnicity.
** Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding



Case Counts by Region to Date








RegionPositiveNegativeInconclusive
Northcentral 10411456517
Northeast1300056019151
Northwest4841294219
Southcentral51484779080
Southeast45684173498944
Southwest34086215647

EpiCurve by Region


EpiCurve%20by%20Region.png

Case counts are displayed by the date that the cases were first reported to the PA-NEDSS surveillance system. Case counts by date of report can vary significantly from day to day for a variety of reasons. In addition to changes due to actual changes in disease incidence, trends are strongly influenced by testing patterns (who gets tested and why), testing availability, lab analysis backlogs, lab reporting delays, new labs joining our electronic laboratory reporting system, mass screenings, etc. Trends need to be sustained for at least 2-3 weeks before any conclusions can be made regarding the progress of the pandemic.

COVID-19 Cases Associated with Nursing Homes and Personal Care Homes to Date
This data represents long-term care facilities in Pennsylvania, including Department of Health and Department of Human Services regulated facilities.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cf-Zxjidn_0
14:18 min
082 - Mental Health Q&A Round 2: Reframing, Dealing With Uncertainty, Dismantling Stigma, and More
•May 29, 2020

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

How do you deal with things you can’t control? How do we decide what actions are right for ourselves and our families without judging others in the process? What is contributing to COVID-19 stigma? How do we consider the future without feeling overwhelmed? Clinical psychologist Dr. Laura Murray returns for another round of mental health Q&amp;A with Stephanie Desmon.

[COMMENT: Karens struggling with Karenism]
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qoIkqdQb2R8
28:55 min
Research difficulties
•May 29, 2020

Dr. John Campbell

Levels of evidence (Dr. Sackett) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti... I =
Meta analyses or RCT with clear cut results II = Small RCT with unclear results III = Cohort or case control study IV = Historical cohort of case-control studies V = Case series studies with no controls Practice recommendations A = Strong recommendation Level I evidence or consistent findings B = Recommendation Level II, III or IV but consistent C = Opinion Evidence but inconsistent D = Opinion Level V evidence or no systematic empirical evidence Research on covid-19 is suffering “imperfect incentives at every stage” (28th May) https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m... Cite bate Scientists and journalists Journalists are reporting on more preprint studies that have not been peer reviewed and vary in quality What we are seeing is worrying signs of a compromise in quality There is an urgent need for data and knowledge, but false information is worse than no information 2181 publications 304 (14%) primary research papers, 218 (72%) of primary papers observational 82 (27%) of which peer reviewed Therefore 3.7% of all publications peer reviewed primary research Greater transparency needed
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lO3U6h7xuXU
58:45 min
War Room Pandemic Ep 201 - The Great Information War (w/ Bobby Schilling and Kevin Freeman)
•Streamed live 6 hours ago


Bannon WarRoom - Citizens of the American Republic

Steve Bannon, Jack Maxey, Raheem Kassam, and Greg Manz discuss the latest on the coronavirus pandemic as President Trump and Twitter raise the stakes on how Big Tech's "neutral platform" status will be addressed moving forward. Bobby Schilling calls in to discuss more about the dangers Big Tech represents. Also calling in is Kevin Freeman to talk about the steps America is taking to choke down the Chinese Communist Party's ability to do business with The West.
______________________________________

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASqYaIe4_qw
58:27 min
War Room Pandemic Ep 202 - Feeding the Dragon (w/ Chris Fenton, Liz Yore, and Jack Leung)
•Streamed live 5 hours ago

Bannon WarRoom - Citizens of the American Republic


Steve Bannon, Jack Maxey, Raheem Kassam, and Greg Manz discuss the latest on the coronavirus pandemic as the Chinese Communist Party is ramping up its information war in The West. Calling in is Chris Fenton to talk about the CCP's stranglehold on Hollywood. Liz Yore calls in to discuss the situation in Minneapolis. Jack Leung calls in to give an update on the ground as to what is happening in Hong Kong.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLC2O-g6mI0
3:25 min
The Effects of our Coronavirus Lockdown? Expect More CIVIL UNREST (like Minneapolis Riots) to Come
•May 29, 2020

Glenn Beck

It shouldn't be much of a surprise that thousands of Americans began looting, setting buildings on fire, and rioting in the streets of Minneapolis after video surfaced of a police officer violently arresting George Floyd; we've been under lockdown restrictions for months now, and civil unrest is likely to be a result of this coronavirus pandemic for months to come. We KNOW how coronavirus has effected the economy...but we don't yet know exactly how being isolated, jobless, and scared will effect the psyche of an average American. Alcohol consumption, domestic violence, and suicide are just some of the predicted effects -- but will more events, similar to the Minneapolis riots, come too?
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_yIhxIVFt0
3:45 min
How The Medical Device Supply Chain Failed During Covid-19
•May 29, 2020

CNBC
More than three months into the coronavirus pandemic, health-care workers on the front-lines of the battle against Covid-19 say they still face shortages of personal protective equipment. The personal protective shortage was one of the early flashpoint of the coronavirus pandemic. Masks, ventilators, face-shields. It seemed nearly every kind of personal protective equipment was hard to find when Covid-19 first ripped through epicenters like New York City. Here’s how the medical device supply chain works—and how it failed when it was needed most.
 
Top