OP-ED The UN Security Council is about to vote on a “Palestinian State”

justme

justme

Senior Member
endtimeheadlines.org

ALERT: The UN Security Council is about to vote on a "Palestinian State"

(OPINION) Why are they being so quiet about this? On Friday, the UN Security Council will take a vote which will determine whether or not “the State of Palestine” will be granted full UN membership. If this vote is successful, it will formally create a Palestinian state that the international...
endtimeheadlines.org endtimeheadlines.org

(OPINION) Why are they being so quiet about this? On Friday, the UN Security Council will take a vote which will determine whether or not “the State of Palestine” will be granted full UN membership.

If this vote is successful, it will formally create a Palestinian state that the international community will fully recognize. So this is a really big deal. Algeria is the nation that has put this draft resolution forward, and it is scheduled for a vote at 3 PM Eastern time on Friday afternoon…

The United Nations Security Council is scheduled to vote Friday on a Palestinian request for full U.N. membership, said diplomats, a move that Israel ally the United States is expected to block because it would effectively recognize a Palestinian state.
The 15-member council is due to vote at 3 p.m. (1900 GMT) Friday on a draft resolution recommending to the 193-member U.N. General Assembly that “the State of Palestine be admitted to membership of the United Nations,” diplomats said.


It is being projected that 13 of the 15 members of the Security Council could vote in favor of this resolution. So Israel is counting on the Biden administration to veto it…

A council resolution needs at least nine votes in favor and no vetoes by the U.S., Britain, France, Russia, or China to pass. Diplomats say the measure could have the support of up to 13 council members, which would force the U.S. to use its veto.

Just think about this for a moment. The only thing standing in the way of a Palestinian state is Joe Biden. Of course, he wants a Palestinian state to be established, but he wants it to happen due to peace negotiations.

And after the current war in the Middle East is concluded, there will be an all-out push to achieve that goal. For now, the war in the Middle East is poised to go to a dangerous new level.
Israel is preparing to retaliate against Iran, and Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi is promising that even the “slightest action” by Israel will provoke a “painful response”…

Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi has warned Israel it will face a “painful response” if it takes the “slightest action” in response to Iran’s unprecedented drone and missile barrage against the Jewish state over the weekend.

Iran’s first-ever direct attack on Israel on the night of Saturday-Sunday came in response to an April 1 air strike on Tehran’s embassy compound in Damascus that has been widely blamed on Israel.

So, what would that “painful response” look like? Well, Raisi has also said that “nothing would remain from the Zionist regime” after Iran was finished…

Raisi said Saturday’s attack was a limited one but that “nothing would remain from the Zionist regime” should it escalate the current situation, the official IRNA news agency reported.

He is describing an all-out war. Right now, government billboards in Tehran ominously declare that “Tel Aviv is our battleground.” The Iranians are known for their bold talk, but I don’t think they are bluffing in this case.
I believe that they really will try to hammer Israel if there is any attack on Iranian soil, and one Iranian official is even warning that his nation is “prepared to use a weapon that we have never used”…

But Iranian security chief Abolfazl Amouei last night warned that if Israel does respond then Tehran is “prepared to use a weapon that we have never used”.

It is unclear what weapon Amouei was referring to, but he warned Israel to “act wisely” as it considers its next steps. There has been a lot of debate about how hard the Israelis should hit Iran.

But the truth is that Iran is going to strike back really hard no matter what form the attack takes. And it appears that a decision has already been made. In fact, on Wednesday, British Foreign Secretary David Cameron openly admitted that it is “clear the Israelis are deciding to act”. (READ MORE)
 
B

bassgirl

Veteran Member
Or they force the Pale state then have legal grounds to go in and make Israel comply, or try to anyway.
 
Countrymouse

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
So the UN--by fiat--is about to say to Israel--

"Even though we previously voted to recognize the State of Israel, we are now taking that back and formally deciding to TAKE part of your land and give it to your ENEMIES, who have utterly REFUSED all offers of peace/negotiation you have given them in the past (i.e, Yassir Arafat refusing it even when Israel AGREED to EVERYTHING the Pali's WANTED) and despite the fact that we know those SAME ENEMIES have said the ONLY acceptable solution to you is that your nation CEASE TO EXIST."

There are warnings in a certain Book from a certain all-powerful Entity about what He will do to those who "divide MY land" (it ultimately is always described as HIS land, not Israel's--to give to whomever HE chooses).
 
justme

justme

Senior Member
www.youtube.com

United Nations - LIVE

UNTV Live Schedule - 8 April 2024 (EST) 11:30AM-Israeli PR Stakeout12:00pm-Security Council 9596th meetingFollowed by:-Noon Briefing-GA meetingReplay 7:00pm...
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com

UN statements o Pali going on now
 
Zahra

Zahra

Veteran Member
Ok then... as soon as the UN votes for a new nation of "Palestine" Israel should formally declare war on it, then promptly conquer the territory.

As for Iran -- if it were me, I'd say Israel should call the Iranian missile & drone attack a fair reply for its attack on the Iranian embassy personnel and let it be. Tit for tat and done.
 
CaryC

CaryC

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Griz3752 said:
IF by some chance you somehow get clear meaningful responses to those legitimate queries, I'm pretty sure everyone here wants to know.
Click to expand...
I'll try:

1) The world body supports it because it can interfere in US policy. Note the WHO during Covid 19. Where as the world body as individual countries cannot. O and BTW the US pays for it. Like wearing a sign that says "Kick Me".

2) The land the UN sits on, it owns, not rented, or leased. OWNES. Given to the UN by Rockefeller. And while the federal government may want to kick you off of the land you own, they wouldn't dare do that to the UN. Imagine Karen's screaming from coast to coast, and the children will starve.

Don't know if that hit the mark or not.
 
Griz3752

Griz3752

Retired, practising Curmudgeon
CaryC said:
I'll try:

1) The world body supports it because it can interfere in US policy. Note the WHO during Covid 19. Where as the world body as individual countries cannot. O and BTW the US pays for it. Like wearing a sign that says "Kick Me".

2) The land the UN sits on, it owns, not rented, or leased. OWNES. Given to the UN by Rockefeller. And while the federal government may want to kick you off of the land you own, they wouldn't dare do that to the UN. Imagine Karen's screaming from coast to coast, and the children will starve.

Don't know if that hit the mark or not.
Click to expand...
I was already there so it would seem we're on the same side of that ledger.

I was hoping for some clarification on why the US, through a variety of allegedly different Administrations, tolerated such a divisive, radicalising entity to remain on CONUS.
 
Last edited:
packyderms_wife

packyderms_wife

Neither here nor there.
CaryC

CaryC

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Griz3752 said:
I was already there so it would seem we're on the same side of that ledger.

I was hoping for some clarification on why the US, through a variety of allegedly different Administrations, tolerated such a divisive, radicalising entity to remain on CONUS.
Click to expand...
Cool!

'Sides no one from a 3rd world country wants to go to another 3rd world country for a conference.

Go to NYC steak, wine, hookers, good for business.
 
Dennis Olson

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
FYI, the prefix GOV/MIL is for American government or military actions. Further, at the start of the story, “OPINION. is clearly stated. Thus, the prefix should be OP-ED. I’ll change it. Please keep this in mind moving forward.

Thanks!
 
stop tyranny

stop tyranny

Veteran Member
If you want to know what it looks like to be so untrustworthy not even the neighboring islamic countries will allow you in look at the palestinian people.
 
medic38572

medic38572

TB Fanatic
Countrymouse said:
So the UN--by fiat--is about to say to Israel--

"Even though we previously voted to recognize the State of Israel, we are now taking that back and formally deciding to TAKE part of your land and give it to your ENEMIES, who have utterly REFUSED all offers of peace/negotiation you have given them in the past (i.e, Yassir Arafat refusing it even when Israel AGREED to EVERYTHING the Pali's WANTED) and despite the fact that we know those SAME ENEMIES have said the ONLY acceptable solution to you is that your nation CEASE TO EXIST."

There are warnings in a certain Book from a certain all-powerful Entity about what He will do to those who "divide MY land" (it ultimately is always described as HIS land, not Israel's--to give to whomever HE chooses).
Click to expand...
Although enemies, they are controlled by the same entities!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top