CORONA China, 5G, And The Wuhan Coronavirus: The Emperor’s New Virus

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
(I am honest when I say that I had a sneakin' suspicion...this all turns my stomach. This is from a trusted source, and links and more videos at link here.)

Author: Guest, Last updated: March 04, 2020


Could there be a link between the Coronavirus and 5G? Researcher and building biologist Paul Doyon has just spent the last 18 months in China. He’s written a brilliant article laying out the evidence. And how you can protect yourself—an EMF based protection strategy. Warning: this is a heavy science based article with nearly 100 references to studies—neither Paul or myself want to be accused of fear-mongering:

My heart goes out to China and to all its people who have suffered so much due to this new “novel” Wuhan coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19).

However, as someone who had become very sick and had his immune system break down and was sick for six months looking for answers before even suspecting that living in close vicinity to several cell phone towers was actually what was causing the problem and making him sick, I feel I cannot in good conscience remain silent, and I strongly suspect that China and the rest of the world are looking under the wrong stone for what is actually the problem here.

At the moment, with 10,000 recently installed 5G antennas plastering its city, Wuhan is probably one of the most 5G-electropolluted cities on the planet.

Electrosmog Warnings from Scientists for Over 40 Years
Respected scientists, researchers, doctors, and activists have been — for over forty years — warning us about the dangers of wireless radiation and electromagnetic fields. In 1977, the reporter Paul Brodeur published a book called The Zapping of America; in 1985, the late Dr. Robert O. Becker (twice nominated for the Nobel Prize in Medicine for his work on cellular dedifferentiation and re-differentiation in the healing process) wrote The Body Electric, and later published Cross Currents: The Perils of Electropollution, The Promise of Electromedicine in 1990; in 1995 (and again later in 2007), B. Blake Levitt, author and researcher, published Electromagnetic Fields: A Consumer’s Guide to the Issues and How to Protect Ourselves. Since then there have been a slew of other books and documentary movies put out on the subject. And the list goes on and on.

Dr. Leif Stafford, Swedish neuro-oncologist, has called this wireless rollout

the largest biological experiment ever.” 1

And Dr. Robert O. Becker wrote in 1985 that

The dangers of electropollution are real and well documented. It changes, often pathologically, every biological system [emphasis added]. What we don`t know is exactly how serious these changes are, for how many people. The longer we as a society, put off a search for that knowledge, the greater the damage is likely to be and the harder it will be to correct. (p. 304) 2

And finally, Dr. Martin Pall, PhD, and Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences at Washington State University has stated recently that

Putting in tens of millions of 5G antennae without a single biological test of safety has got to be about the stupidest idea anyone has had in the history of the world. 3

The BioInitiative
In 2007, a report titled the BioInitiative was published, it was republished again in 2012, and there have been ongoing updates between 2014 and 2019. Its website states that

the BioInitiative 2012 Report has been prepared by 29 authors from ten countries, ten holding medical degrees (MDs), 21 PhDs, and three MsC, MA or MPHs. Among the authors are three former presidents of the Bioelectromagnetics Society, and five full members of BEMS. 4

These are highly respected scientists coming from some of the world’s most respected universities and institutes. 5

The BioInitiative further warns

… that evidence for risks to health has substantially increased since 2007 from electromagnetic fields and wireless technologies (radiofrequency radiation). The Report reviews over 1800 new scientific studies…. Health topics include damage to DNA and genes, effects on memory, learning, behavior, attention, sleep disruption, cancer and neurological diseases like Alzheimer’s disease. New safety standards are urgently needed for protection against EMF and wireless exposures that now appear everywhere in daily life. 6 See more scientific research here.

5G Warnings
With the coming advent of the newest in wireless technology, 5G, numerous researchers, doctors, and professional and activist organizations have been administering health warnings regarding its coming implementation. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
See here the dangers of 5G radiation.

Unfortunately, for the majority of the population, these warnings have fallen on deaf ears, with the seemingly widely held view out there believing that 5G is the next best thing since Ben & Jerry’s™ Cherry Garcia™ ice cream.

Of course, the downplaying of the hazards is understandable given the extreme benefits and conveniences all this technology has continuously offered an unsuspecting populace. Unfortunately, these people are also often quick to ridicule and marginalize those who try to warn of these dangers by labeling them as Luddite tinfoil-hat-wearing conspiracy theorists, until, of course, either they or someone close to them suddenly gets sick and they then see a possible connection with these EMF exposures, and then suddenly there is a change of tune, and they are quick to inquire about what they can do to protect themselves: e.g. how to shield their homes and offices, what EMF meters to buy.

In Sacramento, California, a 5G antenna was removed from a primary school, after some parents there started to suspect that it was linked to a number of cancer cases in the school. 15

on December 1, 2018, at the request of the US government, Meng Wanzhou — Huawei’s CFO and daughter of its founder — was arrested in Canada on allegations she participated in a conspiracy to defraud banks in connection with Iran sanctions violations, 19

was indeed because Huawei was working to sell their 5G technology to the Iranians. In fact, Iran — in a joint operation between Irancell and Ericsson — had started trialing the technology back in September of 2017. 20 In the article, titled “Irancell, Ericsson Test 5G Systems,” (2017) it is stated that

the technology will be available by 2020 and become globally accessible a year later.
During the event at Irancell headquarters, the company’s CEO Alireza Dezfouli said “We are aiming to keep pace with the international operators. Iran will not be left behind again.

Furthermore, a number of articles in the media, have stated that Iran has carried out “preparations” and is ready to launch 5G. 21 22 23 Well, preparations usually include trialing. Hence, it is easy to believe that Iran already has the 5G infrastructure set up and they have been secretly trialing it.

Belgium, on the other hand, — which had decided not to even trial 5G, let alone implement it, due to radiation concerns 24 — has had only one case so far of the coronavirus (recovered) and no deaths.

In fact, for the majority, the symptoms of patients outside of China, (especially with those away from the 5G), for the most part, have seemingly been relatively mild, as one would most likely see with a regular cold or flu virus, and with many of those infected not showing any symptoms at all.

Mild Symptoms Outside China
It is stated by Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, (Head of the WHO’s Health Emergencies Program), in the continuously updated Al Jazeera article, “What happens if you catch the new corona virus?” that “some patients do not show any symptoms,” and that

You have mild cases, which look like the common cold, which have some respiratory symptoms, sore throat, runny nose, fever, all the way through pneumonia. And there can be varying levels of severity of pneumonia all the way through multi-organ failure and death,” she told reporters in Geneva last week.

However, in most cases, symptoms have remained mild.

We’ve seen some data on about 17,000 cases and overall 82 percent of those are mild, 15 percent of those are severe and 3 percent of those are classified as critical,” said Van Kerkhove. 18

Moreover, in numerous YouTube videos 25 26 27 28 29 we are seeing interviews with patients that have been seemingly showing only mild symptoms.

One example is that of Rebecca Frazier, interviewed numerous times on numerous news programs, after being admitted to a Tokyo Hospital after being found to be infected with the COVID-19 on the Diamond Princess Cruise Ship. In one of the interviews, conducted by the New Zealand news program on the Radio New Zealand (RNZ) network titled “I never really felt unwell,” for example, the interviewer states the following and then goes onto interview Ms. Frazier:


Incapacitated, needing help to breath, and surrounded by doctors in hazmat suits, is perhaps the go-to image of those infected with coronavirus. Not so for Rebecca Frazier, who has Covid-19 as it is now known. Curiously, she looks just fine. She’s in isolation in a Tokyo hospital after testing positive for the virus, while onboard the Diamond Princess Cruise Ship that is now docked in Yokohama, in lockdown for 14 days…. Rebecca says she’s shocked that she has tested positive for the deadly virus given how fit and well she feels.

I just can’t believe it. Just can’t believe this is happening to you. Umm. I… You know, I am not one to freak out….

Did you feel unwell? Do you feel unwell?

No. I never really felt unwell. I had a little bit of a cough when they told me, and when I got here, I had a little bit of a fever, but all of that has normalized and I have no symptoms….“25

In another YouTube video,29 this one from a Chinese TV network, is a report by a nurse in Wuhan, who contracted the virus, and decided to stay home to recover (which might very well have been what saved her life).


In the video, we see her going about her daily life as if only seemingly bothered by what would only be a normal cold virus.

In a BBC 30 report about Steve Walsh, labeled a “Super Spreader,” a man who was apparently infected by COVID-19 in Singapore and apparently spread it to numerous others at a ski resort in France, we hear one of his neighbors state that

His wife told me on the phone that really he is not that ill and she thinks it is a complete basically a load of rubbish umm and it’s no worse than flu. Probably not as bad.” (2:20)


So… why is it that, while these people are seemingly only manifesting mild symptoms, many people in China, and especially in the city of Wuhan (and some other provinces), are having such a difficult time with many unfortunately succumbing to the virus, and (for want of a better expression) “dropping like flies”?

At least 10,000 5G Antennas Installed in Wuhan Alone
What has not been apparent in the news reports is the fact that China in its rush to take the lead in the 5G race, had by the end of 2019 (and mostly within the last several months leading up to the COVID-19 outbreak) installed 130,000 5G antennas throughout the country, 31 with at least 10,000 antennas installed in Wuhan alone. 32 (As a comparison, the USA only has approximately 10,000 5G antennas presently installed throughout the whole country.)


Former President Of Microsoft Canada, Frank Clegg: 5G Wireless IS NOT SAFE

View: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DIV39-KOzh0&feature=emb_title


cont. here:

 
Last edited:

energy_wave

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Research Hulda Clark and her research on killing viruses (including cancer) using frequency's. She died under unusual circumstances in a car crash. Some frequency's kill, others cause growth.

I think China may be one of the only country's not participating in the Chemtrails program.
 

Millwright

Knuckle Dragger
_______________
The virus is running wild in Iran, do they have a huge 5g infrastructure?

Tammi, you are fixated on 5g like it's some kind of death ray.

I'm sure if you spent all day in front of the antennas, it would have a detrimental effect.
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
The virus is running wild in Iran, do they have a huge 5g infrastructure?

Tammi, you are fixated on 5g like it's some kind of death ray.

I'm sure if you spent all day in front of the antennas, it would have a detrimental effect.

Well, in case you have not read my previous posts in regards to this, I am one of the small % of the pop. that is EMF sensitive. Some sources say it is 3-5%, others say 5-10. I am willing to bet that many that are, do not know what the attack on their person and their moods are all about. In the meantime, everyone is affected and hospitals and clinics, and cancer centers are busy...oh, and dentists and counselors and psychiatrists, too.

It is very harmful, kills birds and bees, and it is a mil grade directed energy weapon. The antennaes are spaced very close, and the satellites keep going up here and there, courtesy of the deep-state.

There is a growing body that i am a part of that the eptb will hope be silenced.
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
You know, Millwright, that has helped me to connect some dots. China folks would have more iodine in their diet, may be a good more than the people in Iran (even though some parts were "Americanized" with McD's, etc.?) Iran has third world condition for most, correct?
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
One pertinent video added above...I was having tech problems last night, and ran out of time.

Here is part two of my post, all sourced from China, 5G, And The Wuhan Coronavirus: The Emperor’s New Virus - ElectricSense

Doctors call for delaying deployment of 5G Due to Health Risks

View: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-T2R2htAaqg&feature=emb_title



5G & Cell Tower Protests Worldwide

View: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aLxeBuz0suM&feature=emb_title


Wuhan: One of the Initial Cities Trialing 5G
In fact, Wuhan was one of the initial 16 cities selected to trial 5G back in 2018.

China Unicom will begin testing 5G network in 16 cities including Beijing, Tianjin, Qingdao, Hangzhou, Nanjing, Wuhan, Guiyang, Chengdu, Shenzhen, Fuzhou, Zhengzhou, and Shenyang.

China Mobile will conduct external field test and set up more than a hundred 5G base stations in each of the following five cities: Hangzhou, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Suzhou, and Wuhan. 34

From the article, “Wuhan 5G Industry Development: Five-Chain Coordination, Three-Wheel Drive,” (武汉5G产业发展:五链统筹 三轮驱动), 35 (written in Chinese) published October 11th, 2019, it becomes clear that Wuhan was in a race with other Chinese cities to position itself at the forefront of 5G technology, and with approximately 10,000 5G antennas, is probably one of — if not the most — 5G-radiated city in China:

At present, Wuhan is seizing major developmental opportunities in 5G commercialization, with the construction of a national first-class 5G network as a guide, with the development of a national first-class 5G industry as the main body….

…Wuhan City has fully implemented the “Wuhan 5G Base Station Planning and Construction Implementation Plan,” with an extraordinary policy effort, to guide and support basic telecommunications companies and China Tower Corporation to accelerate the construction of 5G networks. This year and next, Wuhan will build more than 20,000 5G base stations, form a 5G basic network with leading scale, first-class quality, and strong demonstration to ensure full coverage of the 5G network in the city and be at the leading level among similar cities in the country. 35

Finally, it was stated in an article titled “5G network coming to Wuhan,” (April 16, 2018), that “3,000 macro base stations and 27,000 micro base stations” would soon be constructed, and that by 2020, the “5G network will cover every corner of the city and be available at an affordable price.” 36 This means that there may in fact be a lot more than just 10,000 antennas in Wuhan, though 10,000 alone would make Wuhan one of the most 5G concentrated cities in the world.

5G Systems Deployed in Hospitals
What is also concerning here is that China has, since about November of 2019, been installing 5G systems in its hospitals. 37 38 39 40

Key Chinese hospitals, leading telecom carriers and Huawei Wednesday launched a project to establish standards for 5G-based networks in hospitals.” 37

China released a pioneering standard for its 5G hospital networks, following a joint drafting and verification process between the medical and telecommunication industries.” 38

5G Systems Installed at Wuhan Coronavirus Hospitals
And to seemingly add insult to injury here, Huawei was very quick to install 5G systems in the new coronavirus hospitals — Wuhan Volcan Mountain Hospital and Thunder Mountain Hospital — the two hospitals known for only being built in just over a week. 41 42
5G scientific research


The two articles cited here are ironically titled, (1) “Huawei installs 5G in China Hospital to fight Coronavirus,” and (2) “Huawei builds 5G in Wuhan Hospital, aims to indirectly fight the Coronavirus” as this might very well be the complete opposite of what they are indeed intending to do here. There is also an interesting video on YouTube entitled “Chinese hospitals deploy robots to help medical staff fight coronavirus outbreak,” 43 demonstrating this in action.

Chinese Telecoms Started Offering 5G Commercially in Nov, 2019

The Chinese telecom companies started to offer commercial 5G services to its customers on the first of November last year.

China’s three major wireless carriers— China Mobile, China Unicom , and China Telecom —will begin selling 5G services to consumers on Friday, November 1st in 50 major cities, including Beijing and Shanghai, said Chen Zhaoxiong, vice minister of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology on Thursday October 31st at a Beijing conference….

The Chinese government has made building 5G a national priority, clearing red tape and reducing costs so the three wireless providers introduce the new technology as swiftly as possible. “They’ve made this a national priority. It’s part of the [Communist] Party‘s ability to show that it’s delivering the goods,” said Paul Triolo, head of geo-technology at the Eurasia Group consultancy. “And in the middle of the trade dispute and the actions against Huawei, it’s even more important for China to show that they are continuing to move forward despite all these challenges,” he added….

China’s central government wants 5G coverage extended to cover all of Beijing, Shanghai, Hangzhou and Guangzhou by the end of the year. The country’s largest carrier, China Mobile, which has 900 million cellphone subscribers, says it will be able to offer 5G services in more than 50 cities this year….

Approximately 13,000 5G base stations have been installed in Beijing, the communications administration said this week. About 10,000 are already operating. China already has a total of more than 80,000 5G macro base stations, typically cellular towers with antennas and other hardware that beam wireless signals over wide areas, government officials said. See this article on 5G towers.

They said China will end the year with about 130,000, while Bernstein Research estimates South Korea will be in second place with 75,000, followed by the U.S. with 10,000. Piper Jaffray estimated that of the 600,000 5G base stations expected to be rolled out worldwide next year, half will be in China. 31

This basically means that China had suddenly turned on the 5G switch, just less than two months before the COVID-19 outbreak, suddenly blanketing many cities with this 5G wireless radiation. And as of this writing, South Korea’s numbers of COVID-19 cases are also starting to skyrocket. As we can see from the above article, South Korea has the second highest number of 5G antennas with 75,000. That is a lot for a country its size. Is there a connection? I think there is with at present (Feb. 29, 2020) also the highest number of coronavirus cases (3150) and one of the highest number of death rates (17) outside of China.

Part three: next post
 
Last edited:

Millwright

Knuckle Dragger
_______________
The 5g rollout is going to be mostly at 600Mhz, outside cities with heavy tower saturation.

The millimeter wave stuff just doesn't have the range for BFE.
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
Part 3. Retrieved from China, 5G, And The Wuhan Coronavirus: The Emperor’s New Virus - ElectricSense

Forty Cities Drinking 5G Service
In the online article, “These 40 Cities Will Drink 5G Service,” 44 published June 7th, 2019, it was revealed that it had been decided that 5G would be launched in 40 cities across China in 2019 by China Mobile and China Unicom (with no specific information from China Telecom yet at that time).

Cities on this list included in Zhejiang Province were Hangzhou, Ningbo, and Wenzhou, not to mention places like Beijing, Shanghai, Wuhan, Guangzhou, Suzhou, and Shenzhen. The initial plan it seems, called the “7+33+n” 5G network deployment strategy, was to have full coverage in Beijing, Shanghai, Hangzhou, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Nanjing, and Xiong’an, with hotspot coverage in the other 33 cities, and then customized 5G networks in so-called “n” cities, though this might have very well changed as other cities seemingly also wanted full coverage (note Wuhan’s installation of 10,000 5G antennas).

Top Most Coronavirus-Hit Provinces After Wuhan:
Zhejiang and Guangdong

Interestingly, at one point in this saga, the second most hit (with the COVID-19) provinces were Zhejiang and Guangdong Provinces, (though as of this writing, Zhejiang has now been taken over by Henan). 45 The provinces listed below, in Chinese, and in order of most cases, are (1) Hubei (湖北), (2) Guangdong (广东), (3) Henan (河南), (4) Zhejiang (浙江), and (5) Hunan (湖南).

It has been so bad in Zhejiang Province that Japan, on Feb. 12th, even extended its entry restrictions to virus-hit Zhejiang (at the time was third in number of COVID-19 cases).

It includes the cities of Hangzhou and Wenzhou, which have among the country’s highest concentrations of coronavirus cases. Hangzhou hosts the headquarters of Alibaba Group Holding, while Wenzhou is famed as a cradle of small business. 46

On the map (Wikipedia) below 47, Zhejiang Province is the darker red province off to the right and Guangdong Province is the darker red one at the bottom. The darkest red province in the middle is Hubei with Wuhan in its center. Henan Province is above Hubei Province and Hunan Province is below it.

Attribution: Wikimedians / CC BY-SA (Creative Commons — Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International — CC BY-SA 4.0)
These cities (Hangzhou, Wenzhou, and Ningbo) have also been cities selected to trial the 5G in Zhejiang province.

Ookla 5G Maps 48 tracks 5G deployment around the world, the number of telecoms offering 5G service in various cities in China.

In the city of Hangzhou, all three Chinese telecoms are providing 5G service in the city; whereas in Ningbo, only two are, and in Wenzhou, only one (China Mobile) is.

The three cities in Zhejiang Province with the most cases have been Hangzhou (168 cases), Ningbo (156 cases), and Wenzhou (503 cases), 50 which are also curiously the cities selected to trial the 5G. The city proper of Wenzhou itself (though when one includes the outer-lying prefectures the total comes 9 million), for example, with only 200,000 people, has an inordinately high number of people infected with COVID-19, and the city has been on lockdown.

But as you can see from some of the articles selected below that there has been a major push in this city to implement and blanket cover their cities with 5G technology.

In the online article, “China Tower Built 8400 5G Stations in Zhejiang” 51 (Oct. 21st, 2019), it is revealed that 8400 5G base stations have recently been installed in Zhejiang Province, with 4775 (out of an order of 6154) installed in Hangzhou alone, and 3200 of these installed within 100 days (in just a little over three months).

China Tower Built 8400 5G Stations in Zhejiang
According to a person in charge of China Tower (Zhejiang), since this year, it has undertaken more than ten thousand 5G construction demands. At present, 8397 stations have been completed, more than 96% of which were built on the stock station sites. In Hangzhou, since this year, 6154 5G demands have been accepted and 4775 have been completed and delivered, of which 93% are directly met and transformed through stock station sites.

In the downtown of Hangzhou, after receiving the 5G construction demand of three telecom enterprises, China Tower (Zhejiang), with the support of the government, completed 3200 5G base stations in the West Lake scenic area, Olympic Sports Center and other scenes within 100 days, and cooperated with telecom enterprises to complete quick installation and debugging of equipment, based on existing telecom rooms, cabinets, power supporting facilities and 5G antenna added on stock station sites, street lamp poles, buildings, etc. 51

In another online article, published in Chinese, “China Tower installs 8,400 5G antennas in Zhejiang, 96% based on existing sites,” [中国铁塔在浙江建成8400个5G站址,96%基于既有站址], 52 we can see China Tower blanketing Hangzhou with 5G antennas in a very short period of time.

In this article, it is stated that “Zhejiang is one of the earliest provinces in the country to start building 5G networks,” and that “China Tower Zhejiang Company … started the acceleration of 5G construction in the first year of 5G commercialization….” And further that,more than 10,000 5G construction requirements have been undertaken since this year,” with “8397 sites … completed.”

It becomes clear that the Zhejiang Province, home to the tech giant, Alibaba, is one of the provinces slated to become one of the first to introduce the 5G. In the following article, “Delta region to build world-class information communication hub,” 53 (Updated: 2019-11-01) it is stated that with the commercialization of 5G services on Oct. 31st,

[f]ifty cities were selected to become among the first to access commercial 5G services, including 10 cities in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) region, half of which are from Zhejiang province – Hangzhou, Ningbo, Wenzhou, Jiaxing, and Shaoxing.

It is further stated that the three telecom companies plus China Tower would be investing in the region a total of 200 billion yuan (USD $28.4 billion) for the 5G infrastructure construction in order to “build it into a world-class information communication hub.

According to a development plan for the region released in 2016, China Telecom, China Unicom, China Mobile and China Tower are planning to invest more than 200 billion yuan ($28.4 billion) in 5G infrastructure construction in the region by 2021 to help “build it into a world-class information communication hub” promoting the “region’s pilot use of 5G network and applications,” and making “it clear that the YRD region will be the first in China to conduct trial commercial use of 5G services,” while aiming to “realize the coverage of the 5G network throughout the province by 2025.” 53

Coastal City of Wenzhou Worst Hit in Zhejiang Province
In the province of Zhejiang, the cities of Hangzhou, Ningbo, and Wenzhou, have the highest numbers of COVID-19 cases. These are also the main places where 5G has been installed so far in the province.

covid-19


Wenzhou, for a relatively small Chinese city, has the inordinately highest number — at present 503 — of cases in Zhejiang Province, and has been on lockdown 54 since Feb. 2nd when the number of cases there reached 304.

Wenzhou: Internet and 5G Hub
In the past year, there have been numerous conferences in this small city promoting 5G directly or indirectly. 55 56 57

For example, the Conference on the Internet of Things (IoT) for Industry and Energy opened there in September of last year and the Sixth World Internet Conference opened there in October of last year. The Conference on the Internet of Things (IoT) for Industry and Energy exhibited the latest state-of-the-art IoT technologies and 5G applications for big data technologies and IoT platforms. The Sixth World Internet (three-day) Conference brought together over 1,500 attendees from over 70 countries and regions, including Nobel Prize winners, and executives from major tech companies like Qualcomm, Alibaba, and Huawei.

In an article titled, “Experience the construction of 5G base stations under high temperature,” published in Chinese (体验高温下5G基站建设) 58 on Aug. 26, 2019, it is stated that “Wenzhou is one of the first 5G pilot cities of the three major operators, and 5G network coverage is in full swing.

In another article, “Wenzhou shows big ambition in IoT industry,” 59 (Sept. 10th, 2019), it is further stated:

Wenzhou is building itself into a pilot city for China’s smart city construction and 5G applications,” Chen said, “Now, there are 13 cloud computing centers, over 500 5G base stations and more than 10,000 narrow-band IoT bases in the city.

Finally, looking at yet another article published approximately six months later titled “The first case in Zhejiang! S1 line is the first to achieve full coverage of mobile 5G signals,” (Jan. 19th, 2020), (also published in Chinese, 浙江首例!S1线率先实现移动5G信号全覆盖) 60 which revels at the 5G signal penetration along the “Longwan Airport-Wenzhou South High Speed Rail S1 line,” it becomes obvious that Wenzhou has also taken part in the 5G race to plaster its city with 5G electromagnetic waves.

Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) and the Immune System

Wireless radiation from 1G to 5G have all emitted modulated “Radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields (EMFs)” and there are literally thousands of studies showing biological effects from exposures to man-made electromagnetic waves, and out of these, hundreds showing biological effects on the immune system.

To give just one example, research by Kolomytseva, et al. (2002) described in the paper, “Suppression of nonspecific resistance of the body under the effect of extremely high frequency electromagnetic radiation of low intensity,” 61 found that with

whole-body exposure of healthy mice to low-intensity extremely-high-frequency electromagnetic radiation (EHF EMR, 42.0 GHz, 0.15 mW/cm2, 20 min daily)… phagocytic activity of peripheral blood neutrophils was suppressed by about 50% (p < 0.01 as compared with the sham-exposed control) in 2-3 h after the single exposure to EHF EMR…

and that this

… effect persisted for 1 day after the exposure, and then the phagocytic activity of neutrophils returned to the norm within 3 days.

And furthermore,

a significant modification of the leukocyte blood profile in mice exposed to EHF EMR for 5 days was observed after the cessation of exposures: the number of leukocytes increased by 44% (p < 0.05 as compared with sham-exposed animals), mostly due to an increase in the lymphocyte content.

They concluded that,

the results indicated that the whole-body exposure of healthy mice to low-intensity EHF EMR has a profound effect on the indices of nonspecific immunity.

In a paper 62 (written by myself along with Prof. Olle Johansson of the Karolinska Institute) — which I believe offers the most solid hypothesis to date on the main mechanisms by which EMFs do in fact disable the immune system —a number of these related to immune system effects can be found listed in the citations.

Johansson (2012) further details, in Section 8 of the BioInitiative, “Evidence for EMF Effects on the Immune System,” 63 numerous studies demonstrating those effects, especially with regards to how radiofrequency EMFs alter the immune system.

In the previously mentioned Aljazeera article,18 it is stated that a study published in the medical journal, The Lancet, on January 24th, found

what it called a “cytokine storm” in infected patients who were severely ill. The condition is a severe immune reaction in which the body produces immune cells and proteins that can destroy other organs.

Hence, it should be noted here that there are, in fact, numerous research studies showing an EMF effect on cytokines: A PubMed search, for example, produced 119 search results. 64

Back in 1998, a biologist named Roger Coghill conducted an experiment where he “took white blood cells, known as lymphocytes, from a donor,” and kept them alive via the use of nutrients while exposing them to either cell phone radiation or the natural electromagnetic field of the human body. He discovered that of the immune cells exposed to cell phone radiation, only 13% remained undamaged and able to function properly; whereas, of cells exposed only to body’s natural electromagnetic field, 70% remained undamaged and able to function properly. Naturally, while his research did provide insight, he was attacked and criticized by the wireless industry for being “unscientific.”

Dr. Robert O. Becker (1985) wrote of how the immune system is weakened by manmade electromagnetic fields via the induction of “subliminal stress”:

Initially, the stress activates the hormonal and/or immune systems to a higher than normal level, enabling the animal to escape danger and combat disease. If the stress continues, hormone levels and immune reactivity gradually decline to normal. If you stop your experiment at this point, you’re apparently justified in saying, “The animal has adapted; the stress is doing no harm.” Nevertheless, if the stressful conditions persist, hormone and immune levels decline further, well below normal. In medical terms, stress decompensation has set in, and now the animal is now more susceptible to other stressors, including malignant growth and infectious diseases.

… One aspect of the syndrome was very puzzling. When undergoing these hormonal changes, an animal would normally be aware that its body was under attack, yet, as far as we could tell, the rabbits were not. They showed no outward signs of fear, agitation, or illness. Most humans certainly wouldn’t be able to detect a 100-gauss magnetic field, at least not consciously. Only several years after Friedman’s work did anyone find out how this is happening.

In 1976 a group under J. J. Noval at the Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory at Pensacola, Florida, found the slow response in rats from very weak electric fields, as low as five thousandths of a volt per centimeter. They discovered that when such fields vibrated in the ELF range, the increased levels of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine in the brainstem, apparently in a way that activated a distress signal subliminally, without the animal’s becoming aware of it. The scariest part was that the fields Noval used were well within the background levels of a typical office, with its overhead lighting, typewriters, computers, and other equipment. Workers in such an environment are exposed to electric fields between a hundredth and a tenth of a volt per centimeter and magnetic fields between a hundredth and a tenth of a gauss. (pp. 277-278) 2

Continued next post.
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
Part 4 from China, 5G, And The Wuhan Coronavirus: The Emperor’s New Virus - ElectricSense

EMF Weaken immune system


Suffice it to say, while there are multiple mechanisms involved by which EMFs do weaken the immune system, there is no question that EMFs can indeed have an adverse effect on the immune system.

5G Is Much More Powerful and Dangerous Than Its Predecessors
The 5G rollout — either the trialing stage or implementation stage — has already started in most major developed countries of the world, with majority of the rest seemingly preparing for its debut.

The European Commission has asked each member state to select one city to be 5G-ready by 2020 as part of the EU’s 5G Action Plan for a Digital Single Market. The European Commission has asked EU member countries to start trialing 5G in at least one city making it 5G ready by 2020 under its “5G Action Plan for a Digital Single Market.”

Belgium refused — even the trialing phase, not to mention the implementation phase — due to the higher radiation levels that the 5G would bring, which was way above what its radiation standards permitted. Switzerland started with both trials and implementation, but put a halt to further rollout, due to all the complaints about the health effects it was getting. Other countries seemingly just lowered their standards probably because they could not resist the next best thing to Ben & Jerry’s Chunky Monkey Ice Cream. And the USA and China have seemingly been in a 5G race to blanket their countries in this 5G radiation (and most likely inadvertently the coronavirus), with China now seemingly winning on both those fronts.

5G has been divided into low, mid, and high bandwidths. The low-to-mid-bandwidth frequencies “are contiguous and range from 600 MHz to 6 GHz,” 66 and have been used for 1G-4G for the past forty years. On the other hand, the higher-frequency millimeter wave bandwidths are new frequencies starting at approximately 24 GHz (in the US anyway), and have not been used for commercial cell phone service in in the USA until recently with the advent of these commercial 5G services.

For the most part, at present, most 5G is now in the low to mid bandwidth range, with limited high millimeter wave coverage, though that will probably change as the technology develops and is implemented. Also, 5G technology is being implemented alongside with and piggybacking on already-in-place 4G technology. The 5G technology brings with it both larger macro-base stations and smaller micro-base stations installed between the larger macro-base stations. And because these micro-base stations are often closer to people’s homes in residential areas, according to Building Biology Certified Electromagnetic Radiation Specialist (EMRS), Oram Miller,

we are now measuring higher RF levels in client’s homes, especially in second story bedrooms (read Lloyd’s article on EMFs in bedrooms), up to tens to hundreds of thousands of microWatts/meter squared (uW/m2) from these new antennas,

whereas,

the building biology profession and EMF experts around the world say 10 micro-Watts per meter squared or less is safe for sleeping areas (actually, 0.1 uW/m2 is our “No Anomaly” level for sleeping areas). Here is a list of EMF Experts.

Furthermore, as we have gone up the spectrum from 1G to 5G, with each new generation there has been increased modulation, and increased modulation means increased biological effects and biological harm for all life on this planet. 5G is no exception. Oram Miller goes onto further explain

All of these advanced technologies push more cell signals into the same airspace at faster speeds with far more modulation than current 4G cell technologies.

And…

This modulation of cell signals transmitted in the low and mid bands from new 5G and 4G LTE-Advanced small cell radios and antennas popping up everywhere probably accounts for the majority of people living near these antennas who report the onset of health symptoms not experienced previously.

Dr. Martin Pall, Ph.D. (Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences, Washington State University), — who brought the world’s attention to the fact that EMFs cause biological harm via the opening up voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCC), allowing for excessive flow of calcium ions inside the cell and the prompting of nitric oxide (N.O.) production via the stimulation of the enzyme nitric oxide synthase to form a host of reactive oxygen species via downstream effects 67 — has warned that the rollout of 5G will have massive deleterious effects on the world’s population, not to mention all life forms. He believes that 5G will be much more dangerous for the following reasons:

1. The extraordinary high numbers of antennae that are planned.
2. The very high energy outputs which will be used to ensure penetration.
3. The extraordinary high pulsation levels.
4. The apparent high-level interactions of the 5G frequency on charged groups presumably including the voltage sensor charged groups. 68

In a recent paper of his titled “Massive Predicted Effects of 5G,” (Dec. 17, 2019) 69 Pall states that “given the high pulsation level for 5G radiation, even short exposures may well produce severe biological effects,” not to mention the power densities of up to 30 times higher than previous systems of 1G to 4G and with penetration being enhanced via the magnetic component. He is predicting that with the full-fledged turning on of 5G (versus just its trial phase, where there is little communication yet happening with the 5G), that we will be seeing (1) decreased human reproduction, (2) lowered collective brain function, (3) very early-onset Alzheimer’s, (4) increased autism and ADHD, (5) deterioration of the human gene pool, and (6) massive increases in cardiac arrests.

While following the rollout of 5G, he has tracked numerous signs of its biological effects. For example, he has outlined increases in neuropsychiatric effects, cardiac effects, and electromagnetic hypersensitivity, taken from Swiss online articles, 70 71 as what we are already starting to see with the advent of this technology:
• Increases in insomnia, tinnitus, headaches, inability to concentrate, and fatigue.
• Increases in electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS).
• Increases in cardiac arrhythmias.

He reports that while these effects had been reported before with occupational exposure studies and smart meter studies, “the effects appear to be much more severe following [the rollout of] 5G” with “even more severe apparent [yet to be published] 5G neuropsychiatric effects [appearing] in Southern California,” with their own recent massive rollout of 5G.

Furthermore, he states that “we have every reason to believe that any full-fledged 5G system, communicating with the ‘internet of things’ will produce still vastly greater effects than any of these initial findings.” This might very well be what we are seeing in the city of Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province, in China — which has already implemented this technology along with the 5G — with extraordinary high rates of the coronavirus, and who knows what other increases in health effects (e.g. increases in heart problems, blindness, electromagnetic hypersensitivity, etc.) there have been that have not been made public.

He goes onto further outline — in correlation with 5G testing — UK 5G ambulance service suicides, 72 cases of panic in cattle in the Netherlands, 73 and bizarre, aggressive behavior in cattle and sheep in Germany, 74 birth defects in Germany and France, 75 76 and hundreds of birds dropping from the sky due to sudden cardiac arrest during three days of 5G testing in a park near Rotterdam, 77 and the list goes on and on to also include insect death and increases in fires in South Korea. 78 79

(See also the article on is 5G dangerous?)

Could the 5G Be Making the Coronavirus More Virulent?
When we look at the following video, it becomes apparent that smaller life forms like insects are indeed more sensitive to this wireless microwave radiation, with this clear example coming only from radar:

This picture shows some aphids on the leaf of an orange tree. Shortly after radar was installed at a nearby airport a number of years ago, I noticed that every few seconds, all the aphids would tense up in unison and do sort of a little dance, as you see in the picture. Upon further investigation, I found that the interval of time in between the activity of each dance, coincided exactly with the rotation of the radar rotor device at the airport, which was a distance of approximately fourteen miles.


In the following video, Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt talks about an experiment where mold exposed to EMFs proliferated:

Now I am going to make the link to the electromagnetic fields. An acquaintant physician in Switzerland who is a main mold researcher in Europe made a beautiful experiment. He grew mold cultures under a Faraday cage simply like a silver coat, it looks like a mosquito net, that is made out of silver-coated cloth. [It had] been draped over the mold culture. And he measured how much mycotoxins, how much toxins, are these molds producing on a daily basis. Very easy to do. Then he lifted the mosquito net and exposed the mold culture to the ambient electromagnetic radiation in his laboratory, which was caused by the lights that were on, by the computer in the corner, and especially, and he found out later, the ambient cell phone radiation, from the nearby cell phone tower that was broadcasting cell phone radiation. He found out that the production of biotoxins in this culture went up more than 600 times. Not only that the mold suddenly put out significantly more mycotoxins to protect themselves, but also much more virulent, much more vicious, more poisonous mycotoxins. And I took that experiment as was for me a big lightbulb went on….

Dancing Aphids - Radar Excitation - John Ott - www.naturalenergyworks.net

View: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=018C2oG2Rcs&feature=emb_title


So what if the same kind of thing is happening with the 5G radiation and the coronavirus? Pall (2020) lists in a newer version of his paper 80 (previously mentioned) a number of studies which in fact strongly support this theory.

The question that is being raised here is not whether 5G is responsible for the virus, but rather whether 5G radiation, acting via VGCC activation may be exacerbating the viral replication or the spread or lethality of the disease.

Let’s backtrack and look at the recent history of 5G in Wuhan in order to get some perspective on those questions. An Asia Times article, dated Feb.12, 2019 stated that there were 31 different 5G base stations (that is antennae) in Wuhan at the end of 2018.
There were plans developed later such that approximately 10,000 5G antennae would be in place at the end of 2019, with most of those being on 5G LED smart street lamps.
The first such smart street lamp was put in place on May 14, 2019, but large numbers only started being put in place in October, 2019, such that there was a furious pace of such placement in the last 2 ½ months of 2019.

These findings show that the rapid pace of the coronavirus epidemic developed at least roughly as the number of 5G antennae became extraordinarily high. So we have this finding that China’s 1st 5G smart city and smart highway is the epicenter of this epidemic and this finding that the epidemic only became rapidly more severe as the numbers of 5G antennae skyrocketed.

Are these findings coincidental or does 5G have some causal role in exacerbating the coronavirus epidemic? In order to answer that question, we need to determine whether the downstream effects of VGCC activation exacerbate the viral replication, the effects of viral infection, especially those that have roles in the spread of the virus and also the mechanism by which this coronavirus causes death. Accordingly, the replication of the viral RNA is stimulated by oxidative stress: J Mol Biol. 2008 Nov 28;383(5):1081-96. Variable oligomerization modes in coronavirus non-structural protein 9. Ponnusamy R, Moll R, Weimar T, Mesters JR, Hilgenfeld R.

Other aspects of viral replication including those involved in the spread of the virus are stimulated by increased intracellular calcium [Ca2+]i, oxidative stress, NF-kappaB elevation, inflammation and apoptosis, each of which are increased following EMF exposure. The first citation below shows an important role of VGCC activation in stimulating coronavirus infection.

Virology. 2020 Jan 2;539:38-48. Porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV) modulates calcium influx to favor viral replication. Bai D, et al.

J Virol. 2011 May;85(9):4234-45. Distinct severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-induced acute lung injury pathways in two different nonhuman primate species. Smits SL, et al.

Cell Calcium. 2018 Nov;75:30-41. NAADP-dependent Ca2+ signaling regulates Middle East respiratory syndrome-coronavirus pseudovirus translocation through the endolysosomal system. Gunaratne GS, et al.

J Virol. 2011 May;85(9):4234-45. Distinct severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-induced acute lung injury pathways in two different nonhuman primate species. Smits SL, et al.

Proteome Sci. 2011 Mar 8;9:11. Proteomic analysis of chicken embryonic trachea and kidney tissues after infection in ovo by avian infectious bronchitis coronavirus. Cao Z, et al.

Res Vet Sci. 2015 Jun;100:12-7. Serum biomarkers of oxidative stress in cats with feline infectious peritonitis. Tecles F, et al.

J Infect Dis. 2008 Mar 15;197(6):812-6. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency enhances human coronavirus infection. Wu YH et al.

J Virol. 1998 Jun;72(6):4918-24. Transmissible gastroenteritis coronavirus induces programmed cell death in infected cells through a caspase-dependent pathway. Eleouet JF, et al.

The predominant cause of death from this coronavirus is pneumonia. Pneumonia is greatly exacerbated by each of those five downstream effects of VGCC activation, excessive intracellular calcium, oxidative stress, NF-kappaB elevation, inflammation and apoptosis. The first of the citations listed below shows that calcium channel blockers, the same type of drugs that block EMF effects, are useful in the treatment of pneumonia. This predicts that EMFs, acting via VGCC activation, will produce increasingly severe pneumonia and therefore 5G radiation as well as other types of EMFs may well increase pneumonia deaths.

Zheng et al. 2016 Preadmission Use of Calcium Channel Blockers and Outcomes After Hospitalization With Pneumonia: A Retrospective Propensity-Matched Cohort Study. Am J Ther. 2017 Jan/Feb;24(1):e30- e38.

Fang et al. 2017 Pneumolysin-Dependent Calpain Activation and Interleukin-1α Secretion in Macrophages Infected with Streptococcus pneumoniae. Infect Immun. 2017 Aug 18;85(9). pii: e00201-17.

Fettel et al. 2019 Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) induces potent anti-inflammatory effects in vitro and in vivo by S1P receptor 4-mediated suppression of 5-lipoxygenase activity. FASEB J. 2019 Feb;33(2):1711- 1726.

Liu and Shi. 2019 Calcium-activated chloride channel regulator 1 (CLCA1): More than a regulator of chloride transport and mucus production. World Allergy Organ J. 2019 Nov 29;12(11):100077.

Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 18;8(1):15393. Surfactant protein D attenuates acute lung and kidney injuries in pneumonia-induced sepsis through modulating apoptosis, inflammation and NF-κB signaling. Du J, et al.

Curr Neurovasc Res. 2020 Jan 28. MicroRNA (miR)-429 promotes inflammatory injury by targeting kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) in neonatal pneumonia. Zhang L, et al.

Life Sci. 2019 Jul 1;228:189-197. Long noncoding RNA SNHG16 targets miR-146a-5p/CCL5 to regulate LPS-induced WI-38 cell apoptosis and inflammation in acute pneumonia. Zhou Z, et al.

These all argue that 5G radiation is likely to greatly exacerbate the spread of the coronavirus and to greatly increase the lethality of the infections produced by it. The good news is that it is likely that those of us that live in areas with no 5G radiation and who avoid other EMFs wherever possible will probably escape much of the impacts of this prospective global pandemic.

It is highly probable that one of the best things Wuhan can do to control the epidemic in the city is to turn off the 4G/5G system.

Next post, please.
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
Captured Agencies and the Hijacking of the Science
And you might ask yourself, “Why haven’t I heard about this problem?” or you might tell yourself that “Certainly the authorities have our best interests at heart when they make these kinds of decisions.”
Well, in a recent book review 81 of the book Triumph of Doubt (by David Michaels, 2020), Kathleen Rest, Executive Director, Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), (February 14, 2020) outlines how deception is used to manufacture doubt and uncertainty in many industries’ public relations playbooks:

Attack the science. There are lots of tools in this toolbox: commission new “scientific” studies to reanalyze existing data with methodologies biased toward predetermined results; review the literature and risk assessments to question the weight of the evidence; publish these reviews and re-analyses in selected scientific journals; shop for and hire so-called “independent” experts to question the science; provide tasty and contrarian soundbites for the media and public consumption; and more.
Create and deploy front groups with innocuous-sounding names to undermine science, influence public opinion, and gain access to policy makers while maintaining the illusion of independence.
Harass and intimidate independent scientists whose research demonstrates or suggests harm. Or alternatively, curry favor with academic institutions and scientists by providing some form of financial support while also varnishing their public interest image.
Overwhelm regulatory agencies with comments on proposed regulations.
Use their outsized money, power, and access to influence actions/inactions of elected policymakers and agency officials. (Oh, and there’s also that well-oiled revolving door. Just take a look at how many agency leaders and decision-makers in the Trump administration come straight from the very industries they are now supposed to regulate.)

Another tactic that I have noticed is that these people seem to use is to get their plants on a discussion list to make some completely off-the-wall statements so that they can get the media to cover this to try to make everyone involved look like complete whack jobs, which an unsuspecting public is quick to consume and believe. This is seemingly happening right now with this issue. Learn more about the EMF cover-up.

Certainly, how Western governments and corporations manipulate public opinion is different than how it might be done in China, since in the latter case, there is strict government control (e.g. Internet firewall) over what is permitted and not permitted to be accessed via the Internet, etc. Hence, they may not really have to use the above playbook and this may very well be the reason they have been able to move so quickly to implement this technology. But at what cost?

Everything must be taken into account. If the fact will not fit the theory — let the theory go…. Real evidence is usually vague and unsatisfactory. It has to be examined — sifted.” — Agatha Christie

As Agatha Christie says, “Everything must be taken into account.” Ignoring — especially willfully ignoring — any very possible causal factors — especially EMF — in my humble opinion, is just not good science, if you can call that science at all.

According to Dr. Martin Pall, Ph.D.,

The failure of the “safety guidelines” to predict biological effects and therefore safety means that these are not safety guidelines. Consequently, any claims of safety made by the multi-trillion euro-telecommunications industry based on these “safety guidelines” are simply fraudulent.

These failures of the “safety guidelines” must be considered in terms of the principle that is at the core of the scientific method. That principle is that when we have a scientific theory and we test predictions of that theory and the theory predictions are shown to be false, then we must throw the theory out. It follows that when we have eight highly repeated findings each of which show that the “safety guidelines” do not predict biological effects and do not, therefore, predict safety, it is a scientific requirement that the “safety guidelines” be thrown out. The failure of ICNIRP, the European Commission and various regulatory agencies to throw out the “safety guidelines” clearly shows that their actions are both unscientific and anti-scientific. 65

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant.” — Harlan Ellison

Woman thinking


And anyone who would like some insight into how — what is perceived as the sacred cow of of international health organizations — the W.H.O. has been unduly influenced by industry, they need look no further than Swedish oncologist and professor, Dr. Lennart Hardell’s paper, “World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health – a hard nut to crack (Review).” 82

More info., including list of referenced authorities with links, at link

 

ktrapper

Veteran Member
Tammy, thank you for all this information. I was kinda going off of one of Clif Highs videos where he said that the 5G didn’t work very well in Wuhan because of the heavy pollution.
It would be interesting if we could know the proportion of of deaths in proximity to how close they were to the towers.

Perhaps it hit Wuhan so hard because of a combination of the the heavy air pollution and the 5G.

I wonder how many Cities in the US have rolled out 5G?

I have read that high antioxidant superfoods and grounding help mitigate the effects of wifi snd cell radiation on the body.

How many of those severe patients kept their 5G phone right beside them trying to connect I wonder?
 

Thinwater

Firearms Manufacturer
Do you know why the most shark attacks are in 3 feet of water? Because that is where the PEOPLE are.

Based on that you could say the most dangerous place to be re shark attacks is in 3 feet of water, and you would be just as wrong.
 
The 5g rollout is going to be mostly at 600Mhz, outside cities with heavy tower saturation.

The millimeter wave stuff just doesn't have the range for BFE.
600 MHz? Since when is "5G" NOT millimeter-wave? There was a chart that popped up here, on TB2K, that mentioned several countries that are deploying 5G, and the millimeter wave frequencies that they will be using (typically up at 60 +/- GHz).

Got further tech reference/discussion regarding "5G" at 600 MHz?

Also, can 600 MHz "5G" transmitters be used to ALSO broadcast/narrowcast in millimeter frequencies upon command - say, 30 GHz to 120 GHz?


intothegoodnight
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
A Critical Examination of the Coronavirus-5G Connection
1 day ago Derrick Broze 9,901 views 5 min read
Journalist and filmmaker Derrick Broze discusses his view on the Coronavirus-5G connection, and the quest for truth-inspired action. Watch his new interview on the Corbett Report above or on YouTube here.


The best piece of advice I would like to offer in your efforts to reach neighbors, friends, family, and elected officials: do your research. It’s as simple as that.

Do the homework. Don’t just read the headlines of articles and share them. Don’t let other people (youtubers, facebook commenters, government officials, scientists) do the thinking for you.

I have noticed a trend in the “5G Awareness” community (and the larger truth community as well) where folks will see a piece of information that fits their bias or preconceived notions so they accept the information as truth without doing any research.

These individuals then proceed to spread the news to anyone else who will listen, and just like that, blogs, articles, and videos filled with misstatements and half-truths quickly go viral.

When it comes to 5G, I have seen too many theories and speculation about the technology, the purpose of the roll out, and specific health effects that lack concrete evidence.

Most recently, the idea that 5G technology largely responsible for causing Coronavirus symptoms has swept through social media circles.

While there are legitimate studies detailing the impacts of EMFs on the immune system and damage to cells, we must make an effort to distinguish between speculating about things that might be true and facts that we can prove.
Yet-unproven areas include a) the specific deployment of 60 GHz frequencies (e.g. in China); and b) the claims that 60 GHz frequencies are causing disruption of oxygen uptake to the extent that it is causing deaths which are officially attributed to Coronavirus.

In the end, the spreading of unproven reports only hurts those of us who are doing our best to reach the masses with factual evidence concerning the dangers of 5G.

EDITOR’S NOTE: There is some indication of possible additional harm that is unique to 60 GHz radiation. And especially since agencies have indeed de-regulated frequencies around 60 GHz, the relationship between 60 GHz, oxygen and biology needs to be tested far and wide. The following studies cumulatively indicate a significant potential of harm at at 60GHz:

1) 60-GHz oxygen band: Precise experimental profiles and extended
absorption modeling in a wide temperature range
[2011, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy & Radiative Transfer]
2) Evaluation of the Potential Biological Effects of the 60-GHz Millimeter Waves Upon Human Cells [2009, IEEE]
3) Fixed Wireless Communications at 60GHz Unique Oxygen Absorption Properties [2001, Shigeaki Hakusui, Harmonix Corporation]

While a fairly balanced, dot-connecting perspective is put forward in this new Coronavirus/5G article on Electricsense, I want to emphasize that we must always look carefully at the facts and not jump to conclusions. Jumping to conclusions in order to strengthen our existing views does not benefit anyone in the long run.

As we stick to the facts and build diverse coalitions, we can educate our neighbors and politicians, and perhaps, we can put an end to the 5G roll out.

Various types of individuals, groups and local governments all have their own reasons why we need to come together and stop 5G. Motives range from health effects, the decimation of local rights (and basically, the rule of law), and the surveillance implications of a global 5G “dragnet”.

Cities’ Push Toward Total Surveillance To “Fight Crime”
I started researching 5G and electromagnetic frequencies in September 2018, shortly after the City of Houston announced a new partnership with Verizon wireless to make Houston “The World’s First 5G City”. I attended a press conference and asked Houston’s Mayor Sylvester Turner about health and privacy concerns. He told me he hadn’t seen anything to be concerned about.

I also questioned Hans Vestberg, CEO of Verizon, about these concerns and he echoed the mayor’s statements – there are no serious concerns to worry about.

Since that time I have come to recognize that Houston’s Mayor and many of the Big Wireless officials are choosing to turn a blind eye and in some cases, play an active role in launching a technology fraught with legitimate concerns.

Over the last 2 years I have attended City Council, sent emails, made phone calls, conducted interviews, hosted meetings, ran for Mayor, spoke at the Houston Tower Commission, and released a documentary on this important topic. Still – despite all my efforts – I have yet to make headway in slowing down or halting the ongoing roll out of the 5th Generation of cellular technology.

In fact, the City of Houston is moving very quickly towards the Smart City future:

View: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yBm7fmEed7Y&feature=emb_title


Just last week, Mayor Turner and Houston Police Chief Art Acevedo announced new plans to partner with Amazon and other tech companies to complete Houston’s transformation into a Smart City running on 5G. The Mayor and Chief are selling the idea to Houstonians on the premise that more technology means more safety and security.

Unfortunately, a blind embrace of these technologies and the lack of any meaningful engagement of local residents means that Houston will very soon lack any trace of privacy.

Earlier this week I attended Houston City Council in an attempt to educate the council about the concerns (see video above). Once again, I was met with silence.

There are many emerging opportunities for various thought leaders and influences to join forces and develop a simple and accessible template to fight 5G on the local level, through the courts, and when necessary, in the streets with marches and rallies.

Despite the corruption and collusion which I have witnessed and exposed, I see many reasons for optimism. The more people align with truth and then get involved with grassroots action, the better chance we’ll have to take back our future.

Watch Derrick’s “The 5G Trojan Horse Documentary” on YouTube

 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
Infrastructure Council Hits ‘Big Fat Pause Button’ on 5G Antennas

Santa Barbara City Council Reverses Course, Delays Vote on Verizon Licensing Agreement

20200303-City-Council-02.jpg
Sean Mortland speaks in opposition of 5G cellar towers being located on State Street. | Credit: Daniel Dreifuss
By Nick Welsh
Wed Mar 04, 2020 | 9:18am
Share this:
Facing a gathering storm of opposition from anti-radiation activists worried about the health effects of the new 5G cellular technology, the Santa Barbara City Council voted to delay authorizing a licensing agreement with Verizon that would have allowed the cell phone service giant to install up to 60 new 5G cell phone antennas on light fixtures downtown.

Opponents, many dressed in various shades of yellow and all sporting a conspicuous dearth of body fat, implored the council “to have the courage to hit the big fat pause button.” The council voted 4-3 to do just that, delaying the vote on the licensing agreement by 90 days. For the anti-5G crusaders, that marked a small but significant procedural victory; last week, the council voted 4-3 to do just the opposite.

Critics of the new generation of cellular technology charged that the shorter wave lengths of the 5G radiation posed such serious health risks that no carrier could obtain insurance against it. They claimed the radiation compromised the body’s immune response functions and that it induced anxiety, depression, insomnia, and irritability, among other things. Federal safety thresholds, they charged, had not been revised for cellular radio frequencies since 1996. Others suggested the new technology would aid and abet “corporate surveillance” on cell phone users.

City Attorney Ariel Calonne warned the council, however, that the federal government had unequivocally stripped local governments from regulating or restricting the installation of the new cellular technologies for anything but aesthetic and decorative purposes. To regulate for its environmental impacts, he cautioned, would be “an uphill fight.”

Councilmember Kristen Sneddon said she wanted to restrict the new antennas to the maximum extent possible. “I’m up for an uphill battle,” she declared to the cheers of those assembled in the room. So, too, were councilmembers Meagan Harmon, Oscar Gutierrez, and Alejandra Gutierrez, the latter making the motion to delay the vote 90 days.

Councilmember Eric Friedman expressed concern that such a campaign would divert City Attorney Calonne from a long laundry list of other pressing issues.

Currently, no 5G antennas are up and operating in Santa Barbara, though Crown Castle, a large cellular service company, has already installed many on faux light fixtures spaced strategically throughout downtown to maximize signal coverage. AT&T already has a license agreement signed by a previous council to do likewise.

If the council delays too long, Calonne cautioned, Verizon is legally entitled to install its own poles throughout the city wherever it wants. The licensing agreement, he said, at least gives City Hall the ability to regulate the new antennas to meet city aesthetic concerns. Calonne said he can provide a confidential legal memo within three months without diverting his energies from other pressing legal matters.

 

DefVoid

God Luck and good speed!
This was written in 2018 ....

Dr. Devra Lee Davis, founding director of the board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology of the U.S. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, founding director of the Center for Environmental Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, and President of the Environmental Health Trust stated:
“If you are one of the millions who seek faster downloads of movies, games and virtual pornography, a solution is at hand, that is, if you do not mind volunteering your living body in a giant uncontrolled experiment on the human population. At this moment, residents of the Washington, DC region – like those of 100 Chinese cities – are about to be living within a vast experimental Millimeter wave network to which they have not consented – all courtesy of American taxpayers,”
 

Samuel Adams

Has No Life - Lives on TB
So how much tweaking of frequency would it take to weaponize this “5G” from merely dangerous and extraordinarily intrusive to full blown punitive against an immediate population of, say, Chinese protesters.....if not to the point of an outright killing tool ?

Can it be done ?

Cuz, you know, IF it can......then it was written in the playbook from the beginning.
 

Delta

Has No Life - Lives on TB
I'm not sure that I accept this (5G-CV connection), but won't be surprised if it turns out to be true. But, I did some poking on the internet looking for maps of 5G coverage. Such maps are there, but it looks like the companies are making it sound like there is more coverage than there really is (marketing). Strange, though, I'm not finding maps showing high coverage in China. That may be more about the information than the fact, thought.
 
So how much tweaking of frequency would it take to weaponize this “5G” from merely dangerous and extraordinarily intrusive to full blown punitive against an immediate population of, say, Chinese protesters.....if not to the point of an outright killing tool ?

Can it be done ?

Cuz, you know, IF it can......then it was written in the playbook from the beginning.
Without dragging this conversation too far into woo territory, the simple answer to your question is YES. More specifically, knowing that while 5G is "allocated" to ~60 GHZ frequency in the U.S., there are questions as to whether those same 5G transmitters can be simultaneously utilized to emit other millimeter wave frequencies outside of their authorized frequency slot - there seems to be several questions as to what sort of effects, for instance, that a 120 GHz signal can have on the surrounding environment - or any OTHER millimeter wave signal between 30 and 120 GHz.

Issue two - it appears that these 5G transmitters can be 'pulsed' - meaning that the power can be modulated up/down on-the-fly by an individual 5G transmitter - how much power can be applied, and at what frequencies between 30-120 GHz, utilizing the proposed/existing 5G fabric architecture, are not well understood by J6P - nor the effects on the nearby environment by such 5G transmitter modulations over time.


intothegoodnight
 
Last edited:

rlm1966

Veteran Member
You do understand that 5G has not been deployed widely in the US as of yet, and the phones advertising it have very small print explaining that they are 5G capable. They have just started testing in Atlanta and a few other cities and venues. Also they way 5G works it won't likely be in non-urban environments because of the short hops that it makes between routers, think blocks not miles.

Seriously there is enough weirdness going on in the world without making up stuff that just isn't at this time a practical reality.
 
You do understand that 5G has not been deployed widely in the US as of yet, and the phones advertising it have very small print explaining that they are 5G capable. They have just started testing in Atlanta and a few other cities and venues. Also they way 5G works it won't likely be in non-urban environments because of the short hops that it makes between routers, think blocks not miles.

Presume that you are speaking to me - "You do . . . " - Verizon 5G - Virginia is NOT strictly confined to densely populated urban areas - know this for a fact, first hand.

Seriously there is enough weirdness going on in the world without making up stuff that just isn't at this time a practical reality.

Can you articulate your argument, for the rest of us to ponder? Regarding 5G unknowns, what is "made up," in your estimation?


intothegoodnight
 

DefVoid

God Luck and good speed!
September 20, 2019

Despite FCC announcement 5g cell service will not be coming to Salt Lake City soon.

Some Salt Lake City residents were under the assumption that they would have early access to 5G wireless coverage after an FCC announcement was misunderstood....More here
 

DefVoid

God Luck and good speed!
Quebec has 5 cases of Coronavirus... Let's see if they have 5G yet...........oh what do you know, looks like they do. What a coincidence......right?......right?
---------
Written on June 17, 2019

The city of Montreal is planning a pilot project to get ready for fifth-generation (5G) cellular technology, the executive committee member responsible for the smart city announced Monday.

Preparations for a “living lab” to test 5G technology will start this summer, François Croteau said at a press conference at city hall. Starting this fall, the city and private-sector partners will install about 200 antennas in the downtown core, he said.

The antennas, about the size of a desktop computer, are small enough to be installed atop lampposts or traffic lights and only cover a small geographic area. The 200 antennas will be installed in an area stretching from Guy St. to St-Laurent Blvd. and from Sherbrooke St. W. to Notre-Dame St. W., Croteau said.

New York City is closely following Montreal’s living lab, whose goals are to ensure that 5G is deployed as quickly and efficiently as possible, and also to investigate whether there is any truth to claims of adverse health effects from 5G, he said.

The pilot project, partly subsidized by the Quebec Union of Municipalities, will allow high-tech startups and other companies to test applications, he said.
Preparatory work for the pilot will begin this summer. Installation of the antennas will begin in the fall, and the living lab will take shape in 2020.

Montreal Gazette
 

Millwright

Knuckle Dragger
_______________
Snipped from the webz.

5G will use spectrum in the existing LTE frequency range (600 MHz to 6 GHz) and also in millimeter wave bands (24–86 GHz). 5G technologies have to satisfy ITU IMT-2020 requirements and/or 3GPP Release 15; while IMT-2020 specifies data rates of 20 Gbit/s, 5G speed in sub-6 GHz bands is similar to 4G.
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
It must be getting cranked up in my AO. The last few days have been awful, and I have been praying against it a lot. It is burns for me and weird sensations crossing my joints and liver area, pain and discomfort I don't know how to describe. TPTB seem to be ramping it up gradually. It is bad.

And it appears that if deer come into town where it is, they run hari-kari like, zigzagging around, road or yard, whatever.

It is affecting my cognitive strength, and the depression has been bad.

Therefore, I am using my Spiritual Authority that Scripture Instructs, to put this onto the senders: those that lie to the masse to put the Georgia Guidestone actions into place, in the name of mother earth or kali, or what ever gods and goddesses they bow to and worship. In JESUS' PRECIOUS NAME I DO Pray. Amen!
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
Tammy, thank you for all this information. I was kinda going off of one of Clif Highs videos where he said that the 5G didn’t work very well in Wuhan because of the heavy pollution.
It would be interesting if we could know the proportion of of deaths in proximity to how close they were to the towers.

Perhaps it hit Wuhan so hard because of a combination of the the heavy air pollution and the 5G.

I wonder how many Cities in the US have rolled out 5G?

I have read that high antioxidant superfoods and grounding help mitigate the effects of wifi snd cell radiation on the body.

How many of those severe patients kept their 5G phone right beside them trying to connect I wonder?

You are welcome. Anything that breaks down peoples' immune systems is what they need, and pollution helps do that too.

****It just dawned on me: maybe their little experiment didn't pan out as well as these evil psycho killers wanted it to. I contribute it to the Power Of Prayer. God can protect His Own. It was very Uplifting and Refreshing to hear a woman on CNN with a soothing Christian voice and demeanor mention her Faith while in quarantine on a cruise that she took before starting radiation and chemo...60 y.o. Too young to have cancer.

Thanks for your questions and info. here. Food for thought.
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
Snipped from the webz.

5G will use spectrum in the existing LTE frequency range (600 MHz to 6 GHz) and also in millimeter wave bands (24–86 GHz). 5G technologies have to satisfy ITU IMT-2020 requirements and/or 3GPP Release 15; while IMT-2020 specifies data rates of 20 Gbit/s, 5G speed in sub-6 GHz bands is similar to 4G.

Well, if it were similar, then how come it is uninsurable by insurers? What is the reason for the "next generation" complete with all the hype, satellites, and great need for all of the thousands of small close towers?
 

Millwright

Knuckle Dragger
_______________
Well, if it were similar, then how come it is uninsurable by insurers? What is the reason for the "next generation" complete with all the hype, satellites, and great need for all of the thousands of small close towers?

Look closer at the supposed detrimental effects of different frequencies.

The 5g rollout is going to be mostly at 600Mhz, outside cities with heavy tower saturation.

The millimeter wave stuff just doesn't have the range for BFE.
 
Snipped from the webz.

5G will use spectrum in the existing LTE frequency range (600 MHz to 6 GHz) and also in millimeter wave bands (24–86 GHz). 5G technologies have to satisfy ITU IMT-2020 requirements and/or 3GPP Release 15; while IMT-2020 specifies data rates of 20 Gbit/s, 5G speed in sub-6 GHz bands is similar to 4G.
I sent a PM to LoupGarou - he may be able to provide an up-to-date perspective on this 5G conversation - my wireless digital data comms background is 25-years out of date - understand the technicals, but am not conversant in the specific international specs for either 4G/LTE or 5G, nor if 5G is a multi-use technology - public and FedGov security state.

Also, broader architecture questions - for instance, what is known about alleged 5G sats - what frequency are they using, and how is it that they have enough power at 60 GHz to reach between the user on the ground and whatever altitude the satellite is parked at, with a usable 60 GHz data pipe/highway. Are there high-powered burst modes that 5G can use, and what are those technicalities?


intothegoodnight
 
Last edited:

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
Look closer at the supposed detrimental effects of different frequencies.

To be honest, it does me know good to know that part. Receding gums, racing heart, headaches, brain fog, burns, joint pain, dehydration (no I don't flush the toilet 10-15x like Trump said not too long ago), liver discomfort, loss of dexterity, extreme depression, memory problems, etc. etc. I could go on but I won't...are part of all i need to know. I have already researched this enough, with fear...then Faith kicked in...I can pray against it. God is allowing this for a reason for me, or reasons...like I can post this thread and get responses. :)
 

ShadowMan

Designated Grumpy Old Fart
While I haven't read much on this 5G thing, however, I'm actually not surprised that this is "possible" and think that this question needs some SERIOUS objective investigation. Humans are biological electrically controlled creatures. What wavelengths of electromagnetical emissions are we susceptible to? What do we REALLY know about this issue?

My first thoughts are history related. The Roman's used lead in so many things...plumbing, cooking, food storage, etc., etc., etc. Little did they know - THEN - how toxic lead was to the human body. WHAT ELSE ARE WE EXPOSED TO, today, everyday that we don't know or realize are effecting us, our bodies, our DNA and what else? Think about it. Every year there's something else we find that cause cancer or something else.
 

DefVoid

God Luck and good speed!
Isa 47:11 Therefore shall evil come upon thee; thou shalt not know from whence it riseth: and mischief shall fall upon thee; thou shalt not be able to put it off: and desolation shall come upon thee suddenly, which thou shalt not know.
 

JF&P

Deceased
My ex wifes sister just tested positive for the virus....and she is no where near any 5G.

Me, I live in an area that uses fiber and so there will never be 5g out here in the sticks.
 

Bunkerdown

Contributing Member
I blame Pickles, If you look at the evidence, Everyone who was born in 1901 that ate pickles is dead. Also over 90% of people killed in car accidents have eaten pickles sometime in their life. For the love of God people just because there is a correlation, it doesn't mean there is a causation. otherwise, pickles cause covid 19 too. At this point I regret clicking and can only walk away slowly shaking my head muttering you just can't fix stupid,... just can't fix stupid,...
 
Top