COMMUNISM Virtual Home Invasions: We're Not Safe From Government Peeping Toms

Ogre

Veteran Member
Authored by John & Nisha Whitehead via The Rutherford Institute,
“The privacy and dignity of our citizens is being whittled away by sometimes imperceptible steps. Taken individually, each step may be of little consequence. But when viewed as a whole, there begins to emerge a society quite unlike any we have seen—a society in which government may intrude into the secret regions of man’s life at will.”
- Justice William O. Douglas
The spirit of the Constitution, drafted by men who chafed against the heavy-handed tyranny of an imperial ruler, would suggest that one’s home is a fortress, safe from almost every kind of intrusion.

Unfortunately, a collective assault by the government’s cabal of legislators, litigators, judges and militarized police has all but succeeded in reducing that fortress—and the Fourth Amendment alongside it—to a crumbling pile of rubble.

We are no longer safe in our homes, not from the menace of a government and its army of Peeping Toms who are waging war on the last stronghold of privacy left to us as a free people.
The weapons of this particular war on the privacy and sanctity of our homes are being wielded by the government and its army of bureaucratized, corporatized, militarized mercenaries.

Government agents—with or without a warrant, with or without probable cause that criminal activity is afoot, and with or without the consent of the homeowner—are now justified in mounting virtual home invasions using surveillance technology—with or without the blessing of the courts—to invade one’s home with wiretaps, thermal imaging, surveillance cameras, aerial drones, and other monitoring devices.

Just recently, in fact, the Michigan Supreme Court gave the government the green light to use warrantless aerial drone surveillance to snoop on citizens at home and spy on their private property.
While the courts have given police significant leeway at times when it comes to physical intrusions into the privacy of one’s home (the toehold entry, the battering ram, the SWAT raid, the knock-and-talk conversation, etc.), the menace of such virtual intrusions on our Fourth Amendment rights has barely begun to be litigated, legislated and debated.

Consequently, we now find ourselves in the unenviable position of being monitored, managed, corralled and controlled by technologies that answer to government and corporate rulers.
Indeed, almost anything goes when it comes to all the ways in which the government can now invade your home and lay siege to your property.

Consider that on any given day, the average American going about his daily business will be monitored, surveilled, spied on and tracked in more than 20 different ways, by both government and corporate eyes and ears.

A byproduct of this surveillance age in which we live, whether you’re walking through a store, driving your car, checking email, or talking to friends and family on the phone, you can be sure that some government agency is listening in and tracking your behavior.

This doesn’t even begin to touch on the corporate trackers that monitor your purchases, web browsing, Facebook posts and other activities taking place in the cyber sphere.

Stingray devices mounted on police cars to warrantlessly track cell phones, Doppler radar devices that can detect human breathing and movement within in a home, license plate readers that can record up to 1800 license plates per minute, sidewalk and “public space” cameras coupled with facial recognition and behavior-sensing technology that lay the groundwork for police “pre-crime” programs, police body cameras that turn police officers into roving surveillance cameras, the internet of things: all of these technologies (and more) add up to a society in which there’s little room for indiscretions, imperfections, or acts of independence—especially not when the government can listen in on your phone calls, read your emails, monitor your driving habits, track your movements, scrutinize your purchases and peer through the walls of your home.

Without our realizing it, the American Police State passed the baton off to a fully-fledged Surveillance State that gives the illusion of freedom while functioning all the while like an electronic prison: controlled, watchful, inflexible, punitive, deadly and inescapable.

Nowhere to run and nowhere to hide: this is the mantra of the architects of the Surveillance State and their corporate collaborators.

Government eyes see your every move: what you read, how much you spend, where you go, with whom you interact, when you wake up in the morning, what you’re watching on television and reading on the internet.

Every move you make is being monitored, mined for data, crunched, and tabulated in order to amass a profile of who you are, what makes you tick, and how best to control you when and if it becomes necessary to bring you in line.

Cue the dawning of the Age of the Internet of Things (IoT), in which internet-connected “things” monitor your home, your health and your habits in order to keep your pantry stocked, your utilities regulated and your life under control and relatively worry-free.
The key word here, however, is control.

In the not-too-distant future, “just about every device you have—and even products like chairs, that you don’t normally expect to see technology in—will be connected and talking to each other.”
By the end of 2018, “there were an estimated 22 billion internet of things connected devices in use around the world… Forecasts suggest that by 2030 around 50 billion of these IoT devices will be in use around the world, creating a massive web of interconnected devices spanning everything from smartphones to kitchen appliances.”

As the technologies powering these devices have become increasingly sophisticated, they have also become increasingly widespread, encompassing everything from toothbrushes and lightbulbs to cars, smart meters and medical equipment.

It is estimated that 127 new IoT devices are connected to the web every second.
These Internet-connected techno gadgets include smart light bulbs that discourage burglars by making your house look occupied, smart thermostats that regulate the temperature of your home based on your activities, and smart doorbells that let you see who is at your front door without leaving the comfort of your couch.

Nest, Google’s suite of smart home products, has been at the forefront of the “connected” industry, with such technologically savvy conveniences as a smart lock that tells your thermostat who is home, what temperatures they like, and when your home is unoccupied; a home phone service system that interacts with your connected devices to “learn when you come and go” and alert you if your kids don’t come home; and a sleep system that will monitor when you fall asleep, when you wake up, and keep the house noises and temperature in a sleep-conducive state.

The aim of these internet-connected devices, as Nest proclaims, is to make “your house a more thoughtful and conscious home.” For example, your car can signal ahead that you’re on your way home, while Hue lights can flash on and off to get your attention if Nest Protect senses something’s wrong. Your coffeemaker, relying on data from fitness and sleep sensors, will brew a stronger pot of coffee for you if you’ve had a restless night.

Yet given the speed and trajectory at which these technologies are developing, it won’t be long before these devices become government informants, reporting independently on anything you might do that runs afoul of the Nanny State.

Moreover, it’s not just our homes and personal devices that are being reordered and reimagined in this connected age: it’s our workplaces, our health systems, our government, our bodies and our innermost thoughts that are being plugged into a matrix over which we have no real control.

It is expected that by 2030, we will all experience The Internet of Senses (IoS), enabled by Artificial Intelligence (AI), Virtual Reality (VR), Augmented Reality (AR), 5G, and automation. The Internet of Senses relies on connected technology interacting with our senses of sight, sound, taste, smell, and touch by way of the brain as the user interface. As journalist Susan Fourtane explains:
Many predict that by 2030, the lines between thinking and doing will blur. Fifty-nine percent of consumers believe that we will be able to see map routes on VR glasses by simply thinking of a destination… By 2030, technology is set to respond to our thoughts, and even share them with others… Using the brain as an interface could mean the end of keyboards, mice, game controllers, and ultimately user interfaces for any digital device. The user needs to only think about the commands, and they will just happen. Smartphones could even function without touch screens.
Once technology is able to access and act on your thoughts, not even your innermost thoughts will be safe from the Thought Police.

Thus far, the public response to concerns about government surveillance has amounted to a collective shrug. Yet when the government sees all and knows all and has an abundance of laws to render even the most seemingly upstanding citizen a criminal and lawbreaker, then the old adage that you’ve got nothing to worry about if you’ve got nothing to hide no longer applies.

To our detriment, we are fast approaching a world without the Fourth Amendment, where the lines between private and public property are so blurred that private property is reduced to little more than something the government can use to control, manipulate and harass you to suit its own purposes, and you the homeowner and citizen have been reduced to little more than a tenant or serf in bondage to an inflexible landlord.

When people talk about privacy, they mistakenly assume it protects only that which is hidden behind a wall or under one’s clothing. The courts have fostered this misunderstanding with their constantly shifting delineation of what constitutes an “expectation of privacy.” And technology has furthered muddied the waters.

However, privacy is so much more than what you do or say behind locked doors. It is a way of living one’s life firm in the belief that you are the master of your life, and barring any immediate danger to another person (which is far different from the carefully crafted threats to national security the government uses to justify its actions), it’s no one’s business what you read, what you say, where you go, whom you spend your time with, and how you spend your money.
As Glenn Greenwald notes:
The way things are supposed to work is that we’re supposed to know virtually everything about what [government officials] do: that’s why they’re called public servants. They’re supposed to know virtually nothing about what we do: that’s why we’re called private individuals. This dynamic—the hallmark of a healthy and free society—has been radically reversed. Now, they know everything about what we do, and are constantly building systems to know more. Meanwhile, we know less and less about what they do, as they build walls of secrecy behind which they function. That’s the imbalance that needs to come to an end. No democracy can be healthy and functional if the most consequential acts of those who wield political power are completely unknown to those to whom they are supposed to be accountable.”
As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, none of this will change, no matter which party controls Congress or the White House, because despite all of the work being done to help us buy into the fantasy that things will change if we just elect the right candidate, we’ll still be prisoners of the electronic concentration camp.
 

Toosh

Veteran Member
Heck most people willingly wear FitBit monitors that track and report. Siri and Alexa are willingly installed in homes. The tell all and share with the world every minute of ther life with Facebook. Most don't even delete their google history.

We do it to ourselves.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
The standard USED to be "anything visible to the casual observer."

As in - they could stand at the border and look (and listen) I.e. something that ANYONE could do without technical assistance or augmentation.

A significant in-road was made in the use of lasers reflected off windows and used to listen to conversation held within.

Hacking through existing smart-phone technology has certainly been done. Geo-fencing certainly. "Smart TVs" offer another avenue.

Owner has noted that his new washing machine is "Internet capable" - normally for convenience in diagnosis/servicing but can offer "remote control" from a smart-phone. Who is to say "additional capability" has not been built in?

And - there is this lap-top...Owner has put black electrical tape over the camera...

Dobbin
 

tnphil

Don't screw with an engineer
A significant in-road was made in the use of lasers reflected off windows and used to listen to conversation held within.
And SO easy to build. Even an electronics hobbyist can buy all the components at little expense and wire one up. Many laser diodes come with a collimator, so getting a nice collimated beam isn't difficult. The receive optics are a bit more of a challenge, but you don't need perfection.

Conversely, if someone is not covert enough with such surveillance, it's just as easy for a hobbyist to defeat by modulating a laser with a tone, white noise or better yet, music or other source. :D It's possible that even modulating a group of narrow-beam infrared LEDs might be enough to swamp any reflections bounced off the windows.
"Smart TVs" offer another avenue.
Even if you don't have a smart TV, many cable companies offer smart remotes, such as Xfinity.
Owner has noted that his new washing machine is "Internet capable" - normally for convenience in diagnosis/servicing but can offer "remote control" from a smart-phone. Who is to say "additional capability" has not been built in?
Unless someone has the know-how to do packet-sniffing, there is no way to know what information is being sent and to what destination. Or whether it's to the manufacturer. Or perhaps to a "backdoor" built-in to some of those Chinese chips.
And - there is this lap-top...Owner has put black electrical tape over the camera...
Do the same for tablets. While traveling and not expecting calls, put the cellphone in a Faraday bag...
 
Last edited:

Doc1

Has No Life - Lives on TB
I have long considered many of the things addressed in this thread. One of the surveillance possibilities I've considered is at gun shows. Many people, myself included, enjoy the 2nd-hand options available in person-to-person transactions at gun shows. A lot of people claim that they appreciate the opportunity to buy "paperless" guns at the shows, by only using a bill of sale from the seller.

What seems to be rarely considered is that most of the shows are held in some sort of public venue and that virtually all of them have video surveillance cameras. It's not much of a reach to suggest that using facial recognition software, .gov could monitor all of the buyers and sellers at the shows and monitor their purchases and sales. I doubt if this is currently happening on any large scale, but it certainly seems possible.

Very little of what we do these days is truly private, at least if TPTB take an especially keen interest in any of us.

Best
Doc
 

Ractivist

Pride comes before the fall.....Pride month ended.
Just remember, it's all catalogued. When they want info, they go back and find it. Note that many TV's have camera's in them that record everything in that room and beyond. Seems to me an xbox can pick up the heart beat of a person as they play the game........which means it can likely hear everything in the house.
 

Toosh

Veteran Member
It’s all in the contract fine print of those technologies you have determined you just can’t live without.
My credit card is one that accumulates points that I can then redeem for a reduction of my card balance. The first time I went to redeem points a pop-up window appeared for approval. Approval authorized them to track my purchases, to decline payment for items considered contraband or "of questionable societal benefit..." (WTF!?!) and to sell my personal information collected by them at the time of application or thru purchases. It went on but I quit reading, paid the balance and cancelled the card. At least they were transparent about it
 
I have long considered many of the things addressed in this thread. One of the surveillance possibilities I've considered is at gun shows. Many people, myself included, enjoy the 2nd-hand options available in person-to-person transactions at gun shows. A lot of people claim that they appreciate the opportunity to buy "paperless" guns at the shows, by only using a bill of sale from the seller.

What seems to be rarely considered is that most of the shows are held in some sort of public venue and that virtually all of them have video surveillance cameras. It's not much of a reach to suggest that using facial recognition software, .gov could monitor all of the buyers and sellers at the shows and monitor their purchases and sales. I doubt if this is currently happening on any large scale, but it certainly seems possible.

Very little of what we do these days is truly private, at least if TPTB take an especially keen interest in any of us.

Best
Doc
yet they can not seem to find rioters hmmmmm
 

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
Many predict that by 2030, the lines between thinking and doing will blur.... By 2030, technology is set to respond to our thoughts, and even share them with others… The user needs to only think about the commands, and they will just happen.


Any body remember the movie "Forbidden Planet"?

As was described in the movie, what destroyed the Krill was that they had finally created a single machine (I don't think it was ever called a computer) that could "tie-in" to every single occupant of the planet and make their thoughts--whatever they were--instantly real, physically.

The problem was, they hadn't thought ahead to what that would mean when the Krills' minds were not under conscious control--when they were asleep, and dreaming.

The very first night following the very first day that the machine was activated, the entire population of the Krill all died as they all killed themselves or one another, through the imaginations of their minds..
 

Tristan

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Decades ago relatives believed I was paranoid for suggesting the .gov would use smart appliances hooked up to the internet to spy on us. Running out of conspiracy theories here because they've become reality.


I've come to the conclusion that most folk's metaphorical time "Horizon" is very short - some a month, some a week. Or less.

Those with somewhat longer time Horizons - say a year or so, are called "Prescient".

Those with the longest time Horizons are called crazy.
 

Publius

TB Fanatic
I have read articles where a home owner had their internet ready thermostat hacked a few times and come home to a frozen house. Why would we need a washing machine, refrigerator or TV thats connected to the internet, this is something I cannot understand the need for?
 
Last edited:

Charmer153

Contributing Member
If I remember right, several year ago a court ruled that if a person house curtains are open, then they forfeit any privacy since they make it possible for others to look into their house.
That was before computers and phones all had built in camera. Now the curtains could all be closed, and other could still see inside through a "digital eye".
 

bracketquant

Veteran Member
The standard USED to be "anything visible to the casual observer."

As in - they could stand at the border and look (and listen) I.e. something that ANYONE could do without technical assistance or augmentation.

A significant in-road was made in the use of lasers reflected off windows and used to listen to conversation held within.

Hacking through existing smart-phone technology has certainly been done. Geo-fencing certainly. "Smart TVs" offer another avenue.

Owner has noted that his new washing machine is "Internet capable" - normally for convenience in diagnosis/servicing but can offer "remote control" from a smart-phone. Who is to say "additional capability" has not been built in?

And - there is this lap-top...Owner has put black electrical tape over the camera...

Dobbin
Leave that same piece of tape on for many years, and it starts sliding around, having lost much of its adhesion strength.

Don't ask.





















Don't tell.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
If I remember right, several year ago a court ruled that if a person house curtains are open, then they forfeit any privacy since they make it possible for others to look into their house.
That would be the "casual observer" caveat.

Just like if they "heard" an argument prior to a murder from outside, that become evidentiary as to motivation to the murder.

As in "do you recognize the voices of those arguing?" And thus could place you as the murderer.

Now if they listened by "pinging" the windows to hear the argument - that would not be admissible as evidence - since the casual listener ordinarily can't do that.

Now developing a case is a different matter - the window pinging can't come up in court as evidence, but it may lead to something that can.

"We found your fingerprints as the last person to close the window so the murder scream wouldn't be heard."

The more you know about the ham sandwich, the more likely you are to find something to indict the ham sandwich with.

Dobbin
 

pauldingbabe

The Great Cat
Why would we need a washing machine, refrigerator or TV thats connected to the internet, this is something I cannot understand the need for?

Maintenance and problem solving issues.

I've used the "connect to the internet" problem solving software. It diagnosed whatever was wrong so that when the tech came to fix the issue he actually had all the parts with him to finish the job.

Was actually very impressive.
 

anna43

Veteran Member
If I remember right, several year ago a court ruled that if a person house curtains are open, then they forfeit any privacy since they make it possible for others to look into their house.
That was before computers and phones all had built in camera. Now the curtains could all be closed, and other could still see inside through a "digital eye".
My windows are so dirty that they'd only see shadows.
 

Doc1

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Speaking of surveillance, my health insurance carrier (Aetna) has been harassing me for years with phone calls to arrange a "home health visit." I have told them several times that I'm not interested, as DW and I value our privacy and are not interested in having strangers in our home.

Today I received a letter from Signify Health/Aetna attempting - yet again - to arrange a home visit. These people don't seem to get the message, or more likely there are surreptitious (government) actors in play. Corporations hate wasting money on home visits in any circumstances or for any reasons if they can achieve the same thing remotely. In my case, I visit my medical providers at least on a semi-regular basis, so why the phuck are they so bound and determined to visit our home?

They are really pushing this and of course they extol all of the supposed, wonderful benefits of having a clinician visit and enter your home.

In truth I suspect the same things that most of you probably do; it's purely an attempt to spy on the household and surreptitiously gain information about anything they'd deem 'socially suspect' like firearms, alcohol, drugs, politically-suspect literature or anything which would indicate criminal activity or...who the 'ell knows what else. At least in this household it's not happening.

Is anyone else being pressured by insurance companies (or anyone else) to do home visits?

Best
Doc

PS: DW said she is pressured by her carrier, Humana, to agree to the same thing.
 

Wildweasel

F-4 Phantoms Phorever
Speaking of surveillance, my health insurance carrier (Aetna) has been harassing me for years with phone calls to arrange a "home health visit." I have told them several times that I'm not interested, as DW and I value our privacy and are not interested in having strangers in our home.

Today I received a letter from Signify Health/Aetna attempting - yet again - to arrange a home visit. These people don't seem to get the message, or more likely there are surreptitious (government) actors in play. Corporations hate wasting money on home visits in any circumstances or for any reasons if they can achieve the same thing remotely. In my case, I visit my medical providers at least on a semi-regular basis, so why the phuck are they so bound and determined to visit our home?

They are really pushing this and of course they extol all of the supposed, wonderful benefits of having a clinician visit and enter your home.

In truth I suspect the same things that most of you probably do; it's purely an attempt to spy on the household and surreptitiously gain information about anything they'd deem 'socially suspect' like firearms, alcohol, drugs, politically-suspect literature or anything which would indicate criminal activity or...who the 'ell knows what else. At least in this household it's not happening.

Is anyone else being pressured by insurance companies (or anyone else) to do home visits?

Best
Doc

PS: DW said she is pressured by her carrier, Humana, to agree to the same thing.
We get a call an average of every week from our Part B provider. We always tell them that quarterly visits to our PCP and semi-annuals with our specialists are enough, thank you.
 

bracketquant

Veteran Member
Speaking of surveillance, my health insurance carrier (Aetna) has been harassing me for years with phone calls to arrange a "home health visit." I have told them several times that I'm not interested, as DW and I value our privacy and are not interested in having strangers in our home.

Today I received a letter from Signify Health/Aetna attempting - yet again - to arrange a home visit. These people don't seem to get the message, or more likely there are surreptitious (government) actors in play. Corporations hate wasting money on home visits in any circumstances or for any reasons if they can achieve the same thing remotely. In my case, I visit my medical providers at least on a semi-regular basis, so why the phuck are they so bound and determined to visit our home?

They are really pushing this and of course they extol all of the supposed, wonderful benefits of having a clinician visit and enter your home.

In truth I suspect the same things that most of you probably do; it's purely an attempt to spy on the household and surreptitiously gain information about anything they'd deem 'socially suspect' like firearms, alcohol, drugs, politically-suspect literature or anything which would indicate criminal activity or...who the 'ell knows what else. At least in this household it's not happening.

Is anyone else being pressured by insurance companies (or anyone else) to do home visits?

Best
Doc

PS: DW said she is pressured by her carrier, Humana, to agree to the same thing.
They are bound and determined because you engaged in a conversation with them. I'd just hang up without saying a word.
 

hiwall

Has No Life - Lives on TB
And yet few crimes are solved in the great USA.
Even murders are only solved less than a third of the time.
That shows that all the spying is certainly not to keep us safe but just to keep us controlled.
 

PghPanther

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Most citizens hold the conduit for surveillance and control by the powers to be.......right there in their hands and pay for the use of that as well.

they have citizens as willing contributors to the whole scheme
 
Top