<p>There is <a href="https://theexpose.uk/2021/10/31/100-percent-of-covid-19-vaccine-deaths-caused-by-just-5-percent-of-the-batches-produced/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">an article floating around
market-ticker.org
A small bit from the linked article:
"But now it gets interesting because VAERS exports, it appears, were also set up, whether deliberately or
by coincidink, to make it hard for ordinary people
to find a future correlation between injury or death and vaccine lot number.
"NOTE THAT THIS EXACT CIRCUMSTANCE -- THAT MANUFACTURERS HAD QUALITY CONTROL PROBLEMS ORIGINALLY -- IS WHY VAERS EXISTS. YOU WOULD THINK THAT IF CONGRESS WAS ACTUALLY INTERESTED IN SOLVING THE PROBLEM THIS WOULD BE THE EASIEST SORT OF THING TO MONITOR AND WOULD BE REGULARLY REPORTED. YOU'D ALSO THINK THERE WERE STRONG CIVIL AND EVEN CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR NOT REPORTING ADVERSE EVENTS.
You'd be wrong; the data is across two tables and uncorrelated as VAERS releases it and there is no quick-and-easy reporting on their site that groups events on a comparative basis by lot number. While it is possible to do this sort of analysis from their web page it's not easy."
This is a very good read, and why I've been harping on the notion that the data is munged. Purposefully, perhaps.
At the link, Karl goes into depth on how he sliced and diced the data to come to his conclusions.