DEEP STATE Tucker Carlson Explains That Watergate Was an Orchestration to Remove President Nixon From Office

[Cardinal]

Tucker Carlson Explains That Watergate Was an Orchestration to Remove President Nixon From Office - The Liberty Daily

If you love the news, check out The Liberty Daily's homepage. (PCR)—I have several times reported the same. Nixon was removed because he was making arms limitation agreements with the Soviets and opening to China. This was normalizing the enemy that the military/security complex needed for its...

thelibertydaily.com

I have several times reported the same. Nixon was removed because he was making arms limitation agreements with the Soviets and opening to China. This was normalizing the enemy that the military/security complex needed for its budget and power. It was for the same reason that President Kennedy was assassinated by the military/security complex. The growing suspicion about Kennedy’s assassination meant that the military/security complex could not risk a second violent assassination, so Nixon was politically assassinated.

The same strategy was applied to Trump. When Trump said he intended to normalize relations with Russia, he presented himself as the same threat to the military-security complex as Kennedy and Nixon. That is what Russiagate was about, and what documentsgate, Jan 6 Insurrection, and two failed impeachments are all about. When Russiagate and the impeachments failed, they decided to steal the election. When Trump’s support survived all of this, they decided on the indictments. In the least, the indictments will keep Trump off the campaign circuit and use up his resources in legal fees.

It is the determination and ability of the military/security complex to protect its budget and power that makes peace impossible and wars our way of life.

NEW: Tucker Carlson explains how the FBI and CIA conducted a coup to take out President Richard Nixon with help from journalist Bob Woodward.
“Richard Nixon was taken out by the FBI and CIA, and with the help of Bob Woodward.”
“[Woodward] was that guy. And who is his main… pic.twitter.com/K8Yt9zy9Qk

 

[Dobbin]

It was Eisenhower who warned of the "military industrial complex."

He of course was a WWII General/hero and knew full well both the power of the complex AND having won the presidency by (up to then) the largest popular acclaim (he was a "war hero" after all) he then may have felt somewhat "insulated" from any repercussion of his actions as President. Full blown "coup" had not been done yet - except for a near coup in the 1876 election which Congress resolved in rulemaking. Compromise of 1877 - Wikipedia

JFK was a war hero as well - but it was not enough to save him from his transgressions.

One imagines the Deep State "We need to nip this popular will thing in the bud while we can - are you ready for some wet work?"

Methinks Eisenhower left the stage just in time. The election of 1960 was probably the "last" actual honest election - and even that was in question given Chicago and Joseph P. Kennedy/Mob influence. A mob connection Joseph P. likely later regretted. JFK Files: Newly released documents link Chicago mob bosses to Cuban militiamen

Dobbin
Edit: stylus slip

 

[Southside]

The power of the Presstitutes.
And they're all corrupt to the bone.

EVERY LAST ONE!

 

[vector7]

The (DNC) FBI and CIA conducted a coup to take out President Richard Nixon​

Mrs. Clinton at President Richard M. Nixon’s impeachment hearing in 1974.Credit...Wally McNamee/Corbis, via Getty Images

 

[night driver]

Dobbin, PERHAPS you mis-spoke on 1860 vs 1960 when referring to Joe P's mob connections.

I have always wondered at the unexplained loss of functional training of experienced operatives and the sloppiness of the "Plumbers" raid.

 

[Dobbin]

Dobbin, PERHAPS you mis-spoke on 1860 vs 1960 when referring to Joe P's mob connections.

I have always wondered at the unexplained loss of functional training of experienced operatives and the sloppiness of the "Plumbers" raid.

Corrected.

White House Plumbers - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The White House "Plumbers" (leak fixers) appear to have had a political purpose initially favorable to Nixon. But horse surmises that they were "co-opted." Either bought out or "you'll do as your told" to create their later bungled role in Watergate.

Dobbin

 

[TheHippie]

Tucker has been on quite a roll exposing the details of the inner working of true US government and how it operates. It leaves me a little perplexed that this is happening with little push back. I would expect the Alex Jones treatment if even half of what Tucker has been saying is true. I do appreciate the confirmation he does provide, just don’t think I should trust him. /shrug

 

[night driver]

Check out Tucker's DAD.

I'm pretty sure that when anyone wants to play CAC-Card-Poker, Tucker ranks right up there with "Touch at yer PERIL" folks.

Dick Carlson - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Dennis Olson]

I don’t think I agree. I was just coming of age during that period and remember Nixon clearly. He was paranoid, and I believe he gave approval to execute the watergate break-in.

 

[Barry Natchitoches]

I don’t think I agree. I was just coming of age during that period and remember Nixon clearly. He was paranoid, and I believe he gave approval to execute the watergate break-in.

Was he (unfounded) in his paranoia?

For that matter, was he actually paranoid at all?

I KNOW the lamestream media portrayed him as paranoid, 24/7/365.

But look at the chop job they have given DJT.

Do you really think the media was more accorate in their reporting back in 1972, than they are today?

Put another way, is it just possible the media was used in the 1970s to do a DJT number on Nixon?

 

[Dennis Olson]

Was he (unfounded) in his paranoia?

IMO Yes

For that matter, was he actually paranoid at all?

Yes he was

I KNOW the lamestream media portrayed him as paranoid, 24/7/365.

I didn’t pay overmuch attention to the media at that time.

But look at the chop job they have given DJT.

Okay, and?

Do you really think the media was more accorate in their reporting back in 1972, than they are today?

Yes, by far. Oh, it was still biased, but it wasn’t until many years later that it got bad. Back then, there were lots of conservatives in the media. Not a majority, but quite a few.

Put another way, is it just possible the media was used in the 1970s to do a DJT number on Nixon?

I’m sure they wanted to, but the tools weren’t developed yet. No social media for example

see my answers in the quoted text.