POL TRUE THE VOTE

[BUBBAHOTEPT]

Am I wrong or did True the Vote refuse or could not provide any evidence of ballot fraud for the 2020 election to a Georgia court. It seems like Fulton County courts are the gift that just keeps on giving. 2000 Mules documentary was highly compelling….

 

[Dobbin]

You are not wrong. At least part of the problem is that True the Vote conflated evidence claimed by Dinesh D'Sousa in 2000 Mules and attempted to use this to file an election fraud court case.

The action described in 2000 Mules is there - but Georgia "wanted names" in order to bring charges against individuals - names which the movie/True the Vote could not provide to legal satisfaction.

One thinks of Ruby Freeman and her sister who literally were seen on camera dropping a flash drive containing (probably) "over-writes" applied to tabulators into the pocket of the supervisor - and yet without this flash drive, there is no proof that malfeasance was done. And Ruby and her sister continue to go free.

Even boxes of ballots pulled out from under roll-around tables is not proof enough - those ballots might have been "next in line" to be counted. And the multiple tabulations of single ballot sheets might have been simply an error that was caught by the camera AT THAT MOMENT.

True the Vote - Wikipedia actually is pretty respectful of the "finesse" that is required in a court case. One has to have ABSOLUTE proof of malfeasance in order to bring charges - or in the case of voting, to discount that vote.

2000 Mules does not inform viewers that, even if the events it depicts occurred, every absentee ballot deposited in a drop box must be inside an envelope sent to each registered voter that includes the voter's registration information, signature, and a barcode for verification. Ballots lacking the envelope are rejected. True the Vote did not assert any of the ballots involved in the alleged mule scheme were illegal

At the point of receipt, inspection and totaling those ballots probably WERE legal. Of course one should question the "tracking." Which was REALLY the point True the Vote attempted to carry. This like Owner who claims in the 2020 election he got absentee ballot applications in the mail TWICE - one post-marked from Colorado, and one post-marked from New Jersey. Either, or both of those ballots might have been processed as "perfectly legal" IF the town office didn't do their proper check against Owner repeating his vote.

If the tracking is fraudulent (got proof of this?) then the vote is fraudulent. Connecting the two is the issue.

Of course a lot of this is hooey - it is AMAZING how the system "slow walks" an appeal, discounts claims of fraud, attacks those who claim to have been damaged by malfeasance, ignores those who are prevented from performing their surveillance duties as the opposition party, and generally "puts on the brakes" to anything which might overturn election of a Marxist.

But - the purpose for absolute proof is high minded - although for the Marxists convenient - to say the least.

Dobbin

 

[bbbuddy]

According to them they gave all the evidence to the appropriate authorities in Georgia, but it was all ignored to this day.... and the status of limitations has run out.

On their website:
"*** It is also important to understand that in the geospatial analysis of cell phone data, researchers are working with unique device identifiers, typically International Mobile Equipment Identity (IMEI), not cellphone numbers or personal information. When True the Vote was asked for name and contact information of the 242 identified devices, the SEB knew that was not the type of information we had. The device identifiers we do have had been provided to the GBI in 2021. That information has never changed. Only law enforcement can deanonymize this data. They have the authority to do so. Civilians do not. "

Full article here: True the Vote Responds to Fake News Attacks

 

[Dobbin]

When True the Vote was asked for name and contact information of the 242 identified devices, the SEB knew that was not the type of information we had. The device identifiers we do have had been provided to the GBI in 2021. That information has never changed. Only law enforcement can deanonymize this data. They have the authority to do so. Civilians do not. "

And wouldn't the outstanding J6 participants like to hear this. True the Vote gets slam-dunked on their deanonymized data. But future J6 defendants have this data hanging over their heads waiting for the Deep State to haul them into court for their 20 year sentence. Deanonymization thus becomes a government tool to enslave you, and not set you free.

What is good for the Deep State goose is NOT even available to you.

Dobbin

 

[BUBBAHOTEPT]

Of course a lot of this is hooey - it is AMAZING how the system "slow walks" an appeal, discounts claims of fraud, attacks those who claim to have been damaged by malfeasance, ignores those who are prevented from performing their surveillance duties as the opposition party, and generally "puts on the brakes" to anything which might overturn election of a Marxist.

Thanks folks, it looks like no matter what, there will never be enough evidence, unless you’re Trump or a conservative....