HEALTH Therapists warn: ‘Woke’ ideology undermining cognitive-behavioral therapy

Kathy in FL

Administrator
_______________

Therapists warn: ‘Woke’ ideology undermining cognitive-behavioral therapy​


Critical social justice ideology aids, abets poorer mental health, therapists argue

A new scholarly article describes the mechanisms of how leftist ideology has likely led to a worsening of mental health counseling and classroom curriculum on the subject.

Arnold Cantú and Nathan Gallo are the two social work professionals who authored the article in the latest special Issue of Current Opinion in Psychology.

In it, they attempt to provide “an alternative explanation for potential causes behind the rise in psychiatric diagnoses and poorer mental health outcomes for people who identify as liberal or left-leaning in the United States.”

“Research regularly suggests that left-leaning people have poorer mental health than conservatives,” the two said in an emailed statement to The College Fix, adding it’s a “notable finding that has become increasingly applicable to the younger generation.”

“This article argues that woke ideology—what we refer to as critical social justice ideology—has warped a well-established psychotherapy approach often used to treat various kinds of psychological distress, known as cognitive-behavioral therapy,” they added.

“This ideology’s main tenets are full of ‘cognitive distortions,’ which are faulty, automatic patterns of thinking that CBT attempts to treat. Instead, woke ideology intentionally promotes these patterns, resulting in poorer mental health for clients, families, and therapists who buy into it.”

Their thesis, which builds off the work of scholars Jonathan Haidt and Greg Lukianoff, is that critical social justice ideology has been effectively promoting “reverse cognitive-behavioral therapy,” an inversion of a well-known, well-established, and effective psychotherapy modality.

The paper argues that various aspects of critical social justice ideology, born out of the political Left, are prime motivators for numerous cognitive distortions, such as dichotomous thinking, emotional reasoning, overgeneralization, tunnel vision, and both magnification and minimization.

It defines critical social justice ideology as “the obsession ‘with power, language, knowledge, and the relationship between them,” which creates a worldview aiming to make everything a zero-sum political struggle around identity markers such as race, sex, gender, and others.

These thought processes propagate beliefs that support a “grievance mentality” and “victimhood culture,” stemming from a socio-political understanding which motivates an “oppressor vs oppressed” worldview and demands things like diversity, equity, and inclusion through self-righteous justifications and an all-or-nothing mindset, according to the scholars.

In an email to The College Fix, Cantú said culture and society has changed — especially since 2020 — and as a practicing psychotherapist for over a decade, he has been interested in how left-leaning individuals are likely to struggle more emotionally, psychologically, or behaviorally compared to their conservative counterparts.

He said Left-leaning people’s views influence their mental well-being and don’t develop in a vacuum.

“Therefore, I think that a missing piece to the puzzle has been what kind of belief system might they more likely be adopting—wholesale or parts of—compared to their conservative counterparts,” he said.

The paper explains that core social justice ideology ideas “can lead to faulty thinking and reasoning not necessarily grounded in reality,” impeding a client’s ability to change and improve their lives by masking their thoughts as a pre-set moral conclusion that is the fault of society.

Modern academia has been one of the stalwart advocates for such an ideology, with major institutions promoting DEI and left-wing ideology, they said.

The two authors have experienced critical social justice principles in action in their own education. Cantú himself withdrew from a doctoral program after witnessing what he describes as cult-like behavior and being compelled to view his research through a CSJ lens.

Gallo said he was fairly familiar with key critical social justice readings from his experience in grad school, inspiring him to write an essay describing the program’s ideological slant.

He told The College Fix that under 2022 accreditation requirements from the Council on Social Work Education, an accreditation group currently being criticized by Do No Harm for infusing DEI into their widely used standards, critical social justice has become the heart of bachelor- and master’s-level social work training for new professionals.

This and other attempts to push education to the Left have already formed echo chambers across the country, he said.

“To speak frankly, the consequences of ideological capture for those seeking therapy will be disastrous,” Gallo said. “What concerns me most is realizing the degree to which new social workers and therapists adopt CSJ wholesale due to their training, writing off alternative practice perspectives and remaining unaware of political diversity.”

 

Therapists warn: ‘Woke’ ideology undermining cognitive-behavioral therapy​

“This ideology’s main tenets are full of ‘cognitive distortions,’ which are faulty, automatic patterns of thinking that CBT attempts to treat. Instead, woke ideology intentionally promotes these patterns, resulting in poorer mental health for clients, families, and therapists who buy into it.”
"woke ideology intentionally promotes.....faulty, automatic patterns of thinking......."

In other words, they're living in a dream-world of their own creation, and their 'faith' in this make-believe world is STRONGER THAN ANY FACTUAL INFORMATION anyone tries to present to them.

They REFUSE to recognize anything that challenges their belief-system--the world HAS to be, MUST be, "IS" as their delusions make it.

I think it used to be called "dream disorder" or "wish"something-or-other, but I can only find it now as "Delusional Disorder."

It's so prevalent in our society--as TDS, as gender-fluid ideology, as environmental extremism, even as animal rights (per a post on FB where I was arguing with a lady yesterday felt she was fully justified in stealing a pet when she had been informed who the owner of the cat was, where it lived, etc.-- in keeping the cat and trying to "rehome" it because she personally didn't agree with the OWNER'S choice to allow the cat to roam outdoors).

It's the logical outcome of "My reality is my reality; my truth is my truth and yours is yours" ideology that has been taught to our society even since the 1960's "Do your own thing" and "If it feels good, do it" tectonic moral shift.

"that they should believe a lie" has become a perfect description of our world.


Delusional Disorder vs. Pathological Lying vs. Schizophrenia​



Feature Delusional Disorder Pathological Lying (Pseudologia Fantastica) Schizophrenia
Awareness of falsehood None; belief feels entirely real Partial; some awareness the story is fabricated None during active psychosis
Symptom scope Narrow, often one encapsulated belief Broad, spans many life stories Wide-ranging: hallucinations, disorganized speech, delusions
Daily functioning Usually preserved Often preserved, though relationships suffer Frequently impaired
Hallucinations present Rare or absent Absent Common
Typical onset Middle to later adulthood Often begins in adolescence Late teens to early 30s
Response to evidence Belief persists despite proof May adjust story if confronted directly Belief persists during psychotic episodes
 
Any belief-system is resistant to outside influence:
  • The world is flat.
  • The earth is the center of the universe.
  • There are 72 virgins waiting for me, if I blow myself up.
  • Prophesy re: the 3rd temple.
  • Open borders is good.
  • Only white people can be racist.
To change core beliefs requires admitting you were wrong. For me, that is my modus-operandi, but for most people, not so.

There is also "identity": what we identify with. Most people are tribal. Me? I was raised by wolves, and tend to be a loner...

Disclaimer: I think the "woke" mentality is despicable.
 

Therapists warn: ‘Woke’ ideology undermining cognitive-behavioral therapy​


Critical social justice ideology aids, abets poorer mental health, therapists argue

A new scholarly article describes the mechanisms of how leftist ideology has likely led to a worsening of mental health counseling and classroom curriculum on the subject.

Arnold Cantú and Nathan Gallo are the two social work professionals who authored the article in the latest special Issue of Current Opinion in Psychology.

In it, they attempt to provide “an alternative explanation for potential causes behind the rise in psychiatric diagnoses and poorer mental health outcomes for people who identify as liberal or left-leaning in the United States.”

“Research regularly suggests that left-leaning people have poorer mental health than conservatives,” the two said in an emailed statement to The College Fix, adding it’s a “notable finding that has become increasingly applicable to the younger generation.”

“This article argues that woke ideology—what we refer to as critical social justice ideology—has warped a well-established psychotherapy approach often used to treat various kinds of psychological distress, known as cognitive-behavioral therapy,” they added.

“This ideology’s main tenets are full of ‘cognitive distortions,’ which are faulty, automatic patterns of thinking that CBT attempts to treat. Instead, woke ideology intentionally promotes these patterns, resulting in poorer mental health for clients, families, and therapists who buy into it.”

Their thesis, which builds off the work of scholars Jonathan Haidt and Greg Lukianoff, is that critical social justice ideology has been effectively promoting “reverse cognitive-behavioral therapy,” an inversion of a well-known, well-established, and effective psychotherapy modality.

The paper argues that various aspects of critical social justice ideology, born out of the political Left, are prime motivators for numerous cognitive distortions, such as dichotomous thinking, emotional reasoning, overgeneralization, tunnel vision, and both magnification and minimization.

It defines critical social justice ideology as “the obsession ‘with power, language, knowledge, and the relationship between them,” which creates a worldview aiming to make everything a zero-sum political struggle around identity markers such as race, sex, gender, and others.

These thought processes propagate beliefs that support a “grievance mentality” and “victimhood culture,” stemming from a socio-political understanding which motivates an “oppressor vs oppressed” worldview and demands things like diversity, equity, and inclusion through self-righteous justifications and an all-or-nothing mindset, according to the scholars.

In an email to The College Fix, Cantú said culture and society has changed — especially since 2020 — and as a practicing psychotherapist for over a decade, he has been interested in how left-leaning individuals are likely to struggle more emotionally, psychologically, or behaviorally compared to their conservative counterparts.

He said Left-leaning people’s views influence their mental well-being and don’t develop in a vacuum.

“Therefore, I think that a missing piece to the puzzle has been what kind of belief system might they more likely be adopting—wholesale or parts of—compared to their conservative counterparts,” he said.

The paper explains that core social justice ideology ideas “can lead to faulty thinking and reasoning not necessarily grounded in reality,” impeding a client’s ability to change and improve their lives by masking their thoughts as a pre-set moral conclusion that is the fault of society.

Modern academia has been one of the stalwart advocates for such an ideology, with major institutions promoting DEI and left-wing ideology, they said.

The two authors have experienced critical social justice principles in action in their own education. Cantú himself withdrew from a doctoral program after witnessing what he describes as cult-like behavior and being compelled to view his research through a CSJ lens.

Gallo said he was fairly familiar with key critical social justice readings from his experience in grad school, inspiring him to write an essay describing the program’s ideological slant.

He told The College Fix that under 2022 accreditation requirements from the Council on Social Work Education, an accreditation group currently being criticized by Do No Harm for infusing DEI into their widely used standards, critical social justice has become the heart of bachelor- and master’s-level social work training for new professionals.

This and other attempts to push education to the Left have already formed echo chambers across the country, he said.

“To speak frankly, the consequences of ideological capture for those seeking therapy will be disastrous,” Gallo said. “What concerns me most is realizing the degree to which new social workers and therapists adopt CSJ wholesale due to their training, writing off alternative practice perspectives and remaining unaware of political diversity.”

duh
 
Public schools and universities waved "bye-bye" to common sense a long time ago.

Teaching woke ideology, alternative lifestyles, and critical race theory, good God. Kids today graduate from school without any real-life skills, and college kids earn degrees that are useless.
 
(sarcasm commentary)
Who cares?
I dont, as long as I get to be my own multi-binary of choice flesh blob riding in the back seat of a WAYMO taking me somewhere else, with a hand held biometric surveillance gambling device fused to my hands to keep me engaged with tapping cherries and oranges and loading my fake bank account with REWARDS and keeping me streaming my biometric DATA into my feeds and disengaged with reality while I smack on bioengineered gum and mRNA infused pork rinds on my way to get my ghetto nails done and butthole bleached before my next vaccine update requirements for my current 5 minute city I live in ATM.
Public schools and universities waved "bye-bye" to common sense a long time ago.

Teaching woke ideology, alternative lifestyles, and critical race theory, good God. Kids today graduate from school without any real-life skills, and college kids earn degrees that are useless.
Kids (and adults) can play Candy Crush real good, tho.
 
Any belief-system is resistant to outside influence:
  • The world is flat.
  • The earth is the center of the universe.
  • There are 72 virgins waiting for me, if I blow myself up.
  • Prophesy re: the 3rd temple.
  • Open borders is good.
  • Only white people can be racist.
To change core beliefs requires admitting you were wrong. For me, that is my modus-operandi, but for most people, not so.

There is also "identity": what we identify with. Most people are tribal. Me? I was raised by wolves, and tend to be a loner...

Disclaimer: I think the "woke" mentality is despicable.

My long lost sister!
 
(sarcasm commentary)
Who cares?
I dont, as long as I get to be my own multi-binary of choice flesh blob riding in the back seat of a WAYMO taking me somewhere else, with a hand held biometric surveillance gambling device fused to my hands to keep me engaged with tapping cherries and oranges and loading my fake bank account with REWARDS and keeping me streaming my biometric DATA into my feeds and disengaged with reality while I smack on bioengineered gum and mRNA infused pork rinds on my way to get my ghetto nails done and butthole bleached before my next vaccine update requirements for my current 5 minute city I live in ATM.

Kids (and adults) can play Candy Crush real good, tho.

No wonder my stash is low.

Somebody been digging into it...

:lkick:

02838ffa-be40-4726-b140-55f29b72882d.jpg
 
Performative Progressivism and Integrity Fatigue

Abstract
Background:
This study examines the regulation of belief expression in contemporary university environments. While existing frameworks address conformity, concealment, and dissonance, less attention has been given to sustained behavioral adaptation under conditions where belonging and evaluation are perceived as contingent on ideological alignment. We introduce Integrity Fatigue as a construct describing cumulative depletion associated with repeated divergence between privately held beliefs and publicly expressed positions.

Methods: A cross-sectional mixed-methods design assessed 1,452 undergraduate students at Northwestern University (n = 720) and the University of Michigan (n = 732) between 2023 and 2025. Data were collected via in-person, anonymous surveys using 5-point Likert-type response scales. For descriptive reporting, responses of 4 (agree) or 5 (strongly agree) were categorized as endorsement. Measures assessed ideological self-performance, domain-specific self censorship, coursework misrepresentation, perceived speech conditions, and affective responses. A purposive subsample of 100 students participated in semi-structured interviews examining subjective experiences of expression regulation.

Results: Ideological self-performance was endorsed by 88.2% of participants, with 82.4% endorsing modification or misrepresentation of views in coursework. Self-censorship was endorsed across domains (gender identity: 78%; political beliefs: 72%; family values: 68%). A pronounced belief–expression discrepancy was observed, with 77% endorsing disagreement with a gender-policy item and 2% endorsing willingness to express this publicly. Affective responses included numbness (72%), confusion (68%), anxiety (64%), and desire for authenticity (61%).

Conclusion: Findings indicate that expression is frequently regulated in response to perceived evaluative and social conditions. Behavioral alignment is endorsed alongside persistent divergence between internal beliefs and outward expression, producing a pattern consistent with cumulative strain. Integrity Fatigue is proposed as a construct capturing this pattern, distinct from acute dissonance or situational conformity in its sustained and context-spanning nature.

When environments signal that divergence carries consequence, individuals may engage in behavioral alignment independent of internal belief.

Existing research has examined conformity, impression management, and silence under perceived social pressure.

Full Study:
 
Performative Progressivism and Integrity Fatigue

Abstract
Background:
This study examines the regulation of belief expression in contemporary university environments. While existing frameworks address conformity, concealment, and dissonance, less attention has been given to sustained behavioral adaptation under conditions where belonging and evaluation are perceived as contingent on ideological alignment. We introduce Integrity Fatigue as a construct describing cumulative depletion associated with repeated divergence between privately held beliefs and publicly expressed positions.

Methods: A cross-sectional mixed-methods design assessed 1,452 undergraduate students at Northwestern University (n = 720) and the University of Michigan (n = 732) between 2023 and 2025. Data were collected via in-person, anonymous surveys using 5-point Likert-type response scales. For descriptive reporting, responses of 4 (agree) or 5 (strongly agree) were categorized as endorsement. Measures assessed ideological self-performance, domain-specific self censorship, coursework misrepresentation, perceived speech conditions, and affective responses. A purposive subsample of 100 students participated in semi-structured interviews examining subjective experiences of expression regulation.

Results: Ideological self-performance was endorsed by 88.2% of participants, with 82.4% endorsing modification or misrepresentation of views in coursework. Self-censorship was endorsed across domains (gender identity: 78%; political beliefs: 72%; family values: 68%). A pronounced belief–expression discrepancy was observed, with 77% endorsing disagreement with a gender-policy item and 2% endorsing willingness to express this publicly. Affective responses included numbness (72%), confusion (68%), anxiety (64%), and desire for authenticity (61%).

Conclusion: Findings indicate that expression is frequently regulated in response to perceived evaluative and social conditions. Behavioral alignment is endorsed alongside persistent divergence between internal beliefs and outward expression, producing a pattern consistent with cumulative strain. Integrity Fatigue is proposed as a construct capturing this pattern, distinct from acute dissonance or situational conformity in its sustained and context-spanning nature.

When environments signal that divergence carries consequence, individuals may engage in behavioral alignment independent of internal belief.

Existing research has examined conformity, impression management, and silence under perceived social pressure.

Full Study:
I had trouble following this, but in letting AI simplify it, I get the response below. I find this encouraging! Let the scum-bag instructors/professors think they are winning, and form built-up pressure where the young will eventually "lash out". Yes, it is unfortunate about the "cognitive dissonance", but that seems the lesser of two evils.

"The study argues that many college students feel pressure to appear more progressive than they really are, leading them to self-censor. It proposes that repeatedly suppressing one’s genuine views may cause a cumulative psychological strain the author calls “Integrity Fatigue.” The findings are based on self-reports from students at two universities and should be interpreted in light of the study’s stated limitations."
 
These thought processes propagate beliefs that support a “grievance mentality” and “victimhood culture,” stemming from a socio-political understanding which motivates an “oppressor vs oppressed” worldview and demands things like diversity, equity, and inclusion through self-righteous justifications and an all-or-nothing mindset, according to the scholars.

How else does one train a wealthy western country's 'haves' into 'have-nots' ripe for recruitment as foot soldiers in the communist revolution?
 
Last edited:
This is academia starting to realize they created a monster and they are about to be replaced shortly if things keep swinging hard right.

This is also recognizing that their system of indoctrination is creating a scenario where the recipients are untrainable, incurable, and psychotically delusional..,...
 
These people, simply put, are crazy. As if that is not bad enough, many of them believe themselves to be majestically heroic against all odds, defenders of the outcasts and poor downtrodden criminals. Add in psychologically prescribed drugs and we see the results.
 
People might be interested in this book by Abigail Shrier. There was a chapter in there that talked about the public schools' role in this. Always focused on emotions and less on competency. I had started to see this when I retired from teaching in 2011.



Bad Therapy

Why the Kids Aren't Growing Up​


Abigail Shrier​

Author
Rated 4.6 out of 5
In virtually every way that can be measured, Gen Z’s mental health is worse than that of previous generations. Youth suicide rates are climbing, antidepressant prescriptions for children are common, and the proliferation of mental health diagnoses has not helped the staggering number of kids who are lonely, lost, sad and fearful of growing…

Publisher​

Sentinel

Release Date​

February 27, 2024
 
Part of this goes back to the fact that we are more concerned about feelings than about sucess/failure.

We stopped focusing on meritorious things and instead focused on emotional intelligence.

This approach was to create a framework to brainwash all the students to become liberal communist democrat revolutionaries...
 
People might be interested in this book by Abigail Shrier. There was a chapter in there that talked about the public schools' role in this. Always focused on emotions and less on competency. I had started to see this when I retired from teaching in 2011.



Bad Therapy

Why the Kids Aren't Growing Up​


Abigail Shrier​

Author
Rated 4.6 out of 5
In virtually every way that can be measured, Gen Z’s mental health is worse than that of previous generations. Youth suicide rates are climbing, antidepressant prescriptions for children are common, and the proliferation of mental health diagnoses has not helped the staggering number of kids who are lonely, lost, sad and fearful of growing…

Publisher​

Sentinel

Release Date​

February 27, 2024
This is a great book!
 
Okkkkkkk...hell is tryin to freeze over...someone from the leftish leaning universe...just admitted that the only greater arch enemy off the left than Trump was right?...Trump drives them nuts...admitting Rush was right about liberalism being a mental illness...no other explanation...hell is tryin its best to freeze over...
 
Top