ALERT The Winds of War Blow in Korea and The Far East

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Article is behind a pay wall....HC

Posted for fair use.....

The case for restoring US nukes in East Asia
By STEPHEN BRYEN MAY 6, 2021

From the late 1940s until the 1970s the United States deployed a considerable arsenal of nuclear weapons outside of the continental United States, or CONUS, in Pentagon jargon.


American nuclear weapons were hosted in 27 different countries. In NATO Europe 7,000 US nuclear weapons were positioned in several countries and they remain in the UK, Belgium, Germany, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands and Turkey.


Today, the US has hardly any tactical nuclear capability in North and East Asia and its regional bases in South Korea, Japan, Okinawa and Guam are vulnerable to Chinese missiles and nuclear-capable long-range bombers.


So will the US return tactical nuclear weapons to the Pacific as tensions rise with China? Much has changed in the global power balance as the US posture on nuclear weapons evolved.
 

jward

passin' thru
Indo-Pacific News - Watching the CCP-China Threat
@IndoPac_Info


#Australia should ‘close the #Chinese embassy’ after Global Times missile strike threat Professor advised the Morrison govt to close the Chinese embassy if the ambassador fails to reject a Global Times article threatening a missile strikes on Australia.
Citing a Global Times article Mr Siracusa said long range ballistic missiles were threatened by Beijing which he noted would definitely “follow through” on their claims if tested. “I regard a threat like that as a very serious diplomatic error on their part,” he said.
Call the Chinese ambassador in for questioning, ask him to repudiate the claims & if he fails then expel him from the country “When you threaten another country with a strike on their homeland it’s time to tell the ambassador to go home & that sends a very important message.”
View: https://twitter.com/IndoPac_Info/status/1391695081187409922?s=20


Indo-Pacific News - Watching the CCP-China Threat
@IndoPac_Info



Chilling warning from #China's State Media to BOMB #Australia with long-range missiles should Canberra support #US military action in #Taiwan #Beijing has been ramping up efforts for Taiwan 'reunification' under 'One China'

Hu Xijin, the editor-in-chief of The Global Times, which is seen as Beijing's mouthpiece on foreign policy to the world, said China should retaliate with 'long-range strikes' if Australia gets involved in a potential military conflict over Taiwan.

He warned Australia 'they must know what disasters they would cause to their country' if they were 'bold enough to coordinate with the US to militarily interfere in the Taiwan question'.

Mr Hu said it would be important for the Chinese government to send a strong message about the plan for retaliatory military action 'to deter the extreme forces of Australia' from 'committing irresponsible actions'.

View: https://twitter.com/IndoPac_Info/status/1391238214204104704?s=20
 

jward

passin' thru
humm. China musta skipped school the day they covered carnegies' book..

Indo-Pacific News - Watching the CCP-China Threat
@IndoPac_Info

19m


#Denmark draws #China ire for inviting #Taiwan leader to speak at 'democracy summit' Denmark's foreign minister defended democratic values alongside Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen, drawing criticism from China which considers Taiwan its "sacred" territory.
The Chinese embassy in Denmark criticized the event on Monday, saying "anti-China" activities by foreign forces and separatists to promote independence for Taiwan and Hong Kong were "bound to fail".
View: https://twitter.com/IndoPac_Info/status/1391973882710532097?s=20
 

Plain Jane

Just Plain Jane


US Already Planning How To "Choke" Chinese Submarines In Case Of Conflict
Tyler Durden's Photo

BY TYLER DURDEN
MONDAY, MAY 10, 2021 - 10:10 PM
A hugely significant weakness and set-back for the Chinese Navy and particularly its submarine capability was featured in recent Nikkei analysis, which found that its coastal system already has geography working against it, while at the same time giving Japan and Taiwan a significant edge.

"When you look at China’s submarine bases, every single one of them has a fair bit of shallow water that their submarines have to transit through in order to get to deep water," former US Navy submariner Tom Shugart explained to Nikkei Asia.
Chinese Navy nuclear submarine, via Reuters

A key issue is that submarines are much easier for rival nations to search out and track as they traverse shallow water, while in deep sea waters identity and defensive action against subs becomes extremely difficult.

What's more is that US allies Japan and Taiwan are much less constrained by these "chokepoints" which are more characteristic of China's shallower coastal waters. This gives the Japanese and Taiwanese navies the ability to deep dive a submarine fast, and quickly drop off their east coasts.

"A fast take a look at Google Earth reveals that China’s coast is surrounded by mild blue — which displays shallow seas — in distinction to the darkish blue deep waters that instantly drop off from the east coasts of Taiwan and Japan," Nikkei observes.

And another defense expert was cited on what this means for China and more importantly for Pentagon planning as follows:
"For them to move from China’s near seas to the open ocean, they’re going to have to transit through different chokepoints and straits in the island chains," mentioned Shugart, an adjunct senior fellow on the Center for a New American Security assume tank.
"That will provide opportunities for an adversary — the U.S. and our allies’ submarine forces — to monitor more closely and try to intercept them if we were involved in a conflict, or in the run-up to a conflict."
The US Department of Defense as well as closely affiliated think tank Rand Corp. is said to be studying "chokepoint management" in the region, given that any future potential US and allies conflict with China in the East and South China seas would put the US side at a distinct advantage when it comes to submarine warfare.

US Defense Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin recently signaled that Japan and other regional allies will be essential in establishing 'integrated deterrence' against China based on deeper collaboration.
Map of South China Sea and Beijing's expansive claims...

The rest of the full Nikkei Asia analysis can be found here.
 

jward

passin' thru
popularmechanics.com

China Is Trying to Build an Atlantic Naval Base
Kyle Mizokami

5-6 minutes


china hainan shandong

Xinhua News AgencyGetty Images


  • The general in charge of the Pentagon’s Africa Command warns the Chinese government is attempting to secure naval bases in West Africa.
  • The Chinese Navy would use those bases to refuel and rearm, extending Beijing’s reach.
  • China currently has just one naval base outside mainland Asia.
The People’s Liberation Army Navy could soon be operating in the Atlantic Ocean, according to the U.S. Army general in charge of Africa Command.

China has reportedly approached several African countries for the right to open a naval base. The result could be Chinese surface ships and submarines thousands of miles from their traditional operating areas, which could prove to be problematic for U.S. forces in wartime.
Gen. Stephen Townsend, the top U.S. general for Africa, told the Associated Press on May 6 that China is “looking for a place where they can rearm and repair warships.” He continued:
“That becomes militarily useful in conflict. They’re a long way toward establishing that in Djibouti. Now they’re casting their gaze to the Atlantic coast and wanting to get such a base there.”



Chinese Marines at the opening of the country’s military base in Djibouti, 2017.
AFP ContributorGetty Images

China has reportedly approached countries on Africa’s west coast, from southern Namibia to Mauritius, but hasn’t reached an agreement with any country yet. So far, China has just one overseas base: Djibouti, on the Horn of Africa.
China is slowly, but surely expanding the reach of its naval forces. In the late 2000s, China volunteered to join the international anti-piracy flotilla off the coast of Somalia, a process that forced its navy to learn how to sail from mainland China across southeast Asia and the Indian Ocean, and then conduct roving anti-piracy patrols. This was a huge leap in capability for a navy that had rarely sortied outside of the western Pacific.

The patrols led to China securing the rights to a local naval base, in Djibouti, which is now the home of several hundred Chinese marines—and has spawned reports of Chinese troops harassing U.S. military aircraft with laser beams.
This content is imported from {embed-name}. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
Townsend claims China has tried to sign an agreement to establish a naval base in Tanzania, farther south, and now around the Cape of Good Hope in the Atlantic. If more Chinese bases materialize in Africa, the result could be a string of facilities leading close to the American-dominated Mid-Atlantic region.

This all makes sense from the perspective of a major naval power whose economy relies on international trade. Most of China’s imports and exports travel by sea, and China has a stake in maintaining the freedom of the seas.



Chinese sailors aboard a guided missile frigate wave goodbye as the eighth anti-piracy patrol to leave for the coast of Somalia prepares to depart, 2011. The PLAN used the anti-piracy patrols to hone its ability to sail to and patrol distant waters.
Getty ImagesGetty Images

At the same time, such bases would also be useful in a potential conflict with the U.S. If a war broke out tomorrow, U.S. forces could be reasonably sure of bottling up the vast majority of the Chinese Navy in the west Pacific Ocean, where they could be isolated, sunk, or forced to return to port.

But if Chinese air, naval, and marine forces were based in the Atlantic, they could force the Pentagon to expand the scope of a war with China far beyond the Pacific. The U.S. could be faced with a two-front war, tracking down Chinese aircraft carriers, surface task forces, and attack submarines operating in the Atlantic.

China, for all of its newfound prosperity and the rapid growth of its navy, has few places to send its fleet worldwide. Unlike the U.S. Navy, which can count on a global network of military allies with welcoming ports, the People’s Liberation Army Navy might sail to Russia, Pakistan, Djibouti ... and that’s about it.

Posted for fair use
 

jward

passin' thru
Home» News»Image May Reveal A New Type Of Submarine For The Chinese Navy

New Chinese Navy Submarine
Click to enlarge. Taken from a moving vehicle, the new submarine can be seen through the railings. The design appears to have a new sail (A), possibly a redesigned upper rudder (B) and generally cleaner outer hull (C).

Image May Reveal A New Type Of Submarine For The Chinese Navy
China has a massive submarine building program. Yet new classes of submarine may only be revealed after they have been built. Right now Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) may give us our first glimpse of a completely new type.
H I Sutton 12 May 2021

New submarine may be Type-039C variant of the Yuan-class for the PLAN

A candid photograph of a brand new submarine has surfaced on Chinese social media. We have not been able to corroborate the image with other public sources, so caution is needed. But it appears to show a completely new variant of the Yuan Class family. If so, it is likely to receive the Type-039C moniker among Western defense observers.

The Yuans form the backbone of the Chinese conventional submarine fleet. They are the most modern and powerful of China’s non-nuclear submarines and are believed to be equipped with Air Independent Power (AIP). Their AIP uses closed-circuit Stirling engines to power the electric motors while submerged. This conserves the batteries and means that the submarine can remain underwater for much longer, which in turn makes it more stealthy.

The submarine has a red tarpaulin over the bow. This is not unusual for newly built submarines and can show the country’s flag. It can also be used to hide the potentially sensitive sonar dome from the cameras during launch.

Compared to the existing Yuan class boats, the new submarine has a radically redesigned sail. There are also a number of more subtle changes. The sail, which is partly obscured by the bridge, appears to have a chine running along the upper part, somewhat like the Swedish A-26 Blekinge class. It is also possible that the shadow is part of a scaffolding around the sail, but this seems less likely.

The submarine does not appear to be appreciably longer than the existing boats. This suggests that a vertical launch system for cruise missiles has not been added. However the new boat appears generally cleaner and more modern than existing Yuans, at least on the outside.

I also suspect that China may have been experimenting with new propulsion technologies such as lithium batteries. So a new variant may incorporate some significantly improvements over existing ones.

An Interesting Location
The image was posted on Weibo on May 7 but only got wider attention more recently. It is geo-tagged to a bridge in Wuhan City, which has been conformed by geo-locating the background. The state of construction of some buildings also matches recent satellite imagery. This confirms that the image is relatively recent. And it places the submarine at the Wuchang Shipyard in down town Wuhan.

This shipyard was formally a major part of China’s submarine building program, but production has shifted to a new larger site out of town. We previously reported that submarine construction, of Yuan class boats, had started at the new location.

So it seems odd that a new submarine has been rolled out at the old site. However there have been signs of construction work continuing at the old site, albeit at a much lower rate. Satellite imagery from February clearly shows fresh hull sections of a submarine. These match the Yuan class in general terms, with double-hull construction and three deck levels. And the hull diameter appears correct. They may not be actual production modules, but they confirm a level of activity.

We can speculate that while the new shipyard is the main construction site, first-in-class boats may still be built at the old yard. Additionally, overseas visitors from the Royal Thai Navy, Pakistan Navy and other countries will be present at the new site because it is used for exports. So China may prefer to have the more sensitive models built at a more restricted location.

The Yuan class and its derivatives are proving successful on the export market. The current customers are Thailand and Pakistan. We should be open minded that this may be an export type also. However, on balance I think that it is more likely the next Chinese service variant.

Overall it is too soon to draw major conclusions from this photograph. Analysts will no-doubt be attempting to corroborate it from other sources. However, this may be the first glimpse of the latest and most potent variant of China’s non-nuclear submarines.

Posted for faiar use
 

jward

passin' thru
China does not want war, at least not yet. It's playing the long game
John Blaxland

8-10 minutes


Talk of war has become louder in recent days, but the “drumbeat” has been heard for some time now as China’s military capabilities have grown. China does not want war, at least not yet. It’s playing the long game and its evident intentions have become more unnerving.
Scholars like Brendan Taylor have identified four flash points for a possible conflict with China, including Korea, the East China Sea, the South China Sea and Taiwan, but conventional war is not likely at this stage.

Where tensions are currently high
The armistice between North and South Korea has held for nearly 70 years. The pandemic has severely constrained North Korea’s economy and its testing of intercontinental ballistic missiles has ceased, for now. China has a stake in keeping Kim Jong-un’s regime in power in the North, but the prospects of reverting to a hot war have flowed and ebbed.
Just south of Korea, in the East China Sea, China has intensified its military activities around the Japanese-claimed but uninhabited Senkaku Islands. China appears to be wearing down Japan’s resolve to resist its claims over what it calls the Diaoyu Islands.
The United States has assured Japan the islands fall under their mutual defence security guarantee. But a confrontation with China could test US backing and possibly set the stage for escalated confrontation elsewhere.
Japanese plane flies over Senkaku Islands.
A Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force surveillance plane flies over the disputed Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea. Kyodo News/AP
Similarly, China’s industrial-scale island building in the South China Sea has resulted in extensive military hardware and infrastructure. This will enable the Chinese to consolidate their position militarily and assert control over the so-called nine-dash line — its vast claim over most of the sea.
The US Navy continues to conduct freedom of navigation operations (FONOPS) in the sea to challenge China’s claims. With thousands of marked and unmarked Chinese vessels operating there, however, the risk of an accident triggering an escalation is real.
Chinese vessels in the South China Sea.
A Philippine coast guard boat patrols past Chinese vessels in the South China Sea last month. Philippine Coast Guard/Handout/EPA
In 2016, an international tribunal rejected China’s claims to the waters in a case brought by the Philippines. Despite being a signatory to the UN Convention of the Law of the Sea, China has ignored the tribunal’s ruling and continued to intrude on islands claimed by both the Philippines and Indonesia.

Recently, 220 Chinese vessels were anchored for months at a reef inside the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone. China’s actions appear premised on the dictum that possession is nine-tenths of the law.
Like China’s seizure of the Scarborough Shoal in 2012 that preceded its massive island construction further south, China could conceivably take the unwillingness of the US to challenge its latest moves as a cue for more assertive action over Taiwan.
This is, after all, the main prize Beijing seeks to secure President Xi Jinping’s legacy.

Why Taiwan’s security matters
Taiwan presents the US and its allies with a conundrum. It is a liberal open democracy and the world’s leading computer chip maker. It also sits in the middle of what military strategists refer to as the “first island chain” stretching from Japan in the north to the Philippines in the south. Its strategic significance is profound.
Having adopted a “One China” policy since 1979, the US security guarantee for Taiwan is conditional and tenuous. Reflecting growing unease over China’s actions, polls show strong US public support for defending Taiwan.
So far, ambiguity has served US interests well, providing some assurance to Taiwan while discouraging the PRC from invading.
This guarantee has been important for Japan, as well. With its pacifist constitution, and occasional concern over US commitment to its defence, Japan would be closely watching how the US approaches its Taiwan policy.

Read more: Australia would be wise not to pound 'war drums' over Taiwan with so much at stake

China is so far avoiding open war
Meanwhile, China has metamorphosed both economically and militarily. An exponential growth in China’s military capabilities has been matched by a steep rise in the lethality, accuracy, range and quantity of its weapons systems. On top of this, Beijing has ratcheted up its warlike rhetoric and tactics.
Last month, Xi made a muscular speech to the Boao Forum Asia, calling for an acceptance of China not only as an emerging superpower but also as an equal in addressing global challenges.
China's navy has been significantly upgraded.
China has significantly upgraded its navy since Xi took power eight years ago. Li Gang/Xinhua/AP
Sometimes actions speak louder than words. And China’s actions so far have avoided crossing the threshold into open warfare, refusing to present a “nail” to a US “hammer”. This is for good reason.
If war did break out, China would be vulnerable. For starters, it shares land borders with 14 countries, bringing the potential for heightened challenges, if not open attack on numerous fronts.

Read more: Is it time for a 'new way of war?' What China's army reforms mean for the rest of the world

Then there are the economic concerns. China has significant Japanese, US and European industrial investments, and is also overwhelmingly dependent on energy and goods passing through the Malacca Strait between Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia, the Indo-Pacific’s jugular vein.
This reliance on the Malacca Strait — referred to by one analyst as the “Malacca dilemma” — helps explain why China has invested so much capital in its Belt and Road Initiative and studiously avoided open conflict, at least until it is more self-reliant.

To avoid outright war, China evidently reckons it is better to operate a paramilitary force with white-painted ships and armed fishing vessels in the thousands to push its claims in the South China Sea and East China Sea and constrict Taiwan’s freedom of action.
It also recently passed a new law allowing its coast guard to act more like a military body and enforce maritime law — again in violation of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.

China is also expanding its “grey zone” warfare against Taiwan, which includes cyber attacks, repeated incursions of its air space and territorial waters, and diplomatic isolation to undermine Taiwan’s resolve and ability to resist.

Read more: Explainer: what is 'hybrid warfare' and what is meant by the 'grey zone'?

Would America’s allies help defend Taiwan?
This persistent and escalating challenge by Chinese forces has demonstrated Taiwan’s inability to fully control its waters and air space. Beijing is continuing to build a fleet of amphibious capabilities to enable an invasion of Taiwan.
US pundits are also no longer confident the Americans would win in an outright war over Taiwan, with Washington’s top military officer in the region arguing one could happen within six years.

Taiwan lacks allies other than the United States, but Japan is mindful of the consequences of a US failure to defend Taiwan. Its ocean surveillance and coastal defence capabilities would be exposed if China took Taiwan. But Japan’s constitution precludes direct involvement in defending Taiwan.
Under its Anzus obligations, the US could call on Australia for military support to defend Taiwan. The mutual assistance provisions are not automatically invoked, but the implications of Canberra standing on the sidelines would be profound.
Warnings about rhetorical drumbeats of war remind us the US is no longer the world’s only superpower and suggest Australia should prepare for a more volatile world.

Rather than rely solely on the US, Australia should bolster its own defence capabilities. At the same time, it should collaborate more with regional partners across Southeast Asia and beyond, particularly Indonesia, Japan, India and South Korea, to deter further belligerence and mitigate the risk of tensions escalating into open war.

Posted for fair use
 

jward

passin' thru
'Our friendship will end here:' Duterte tells China he won't withdraw ships from West PH Sea
Jamaine Punzalan, ABS-CBN News

4 minutes


20190425-duterte-china-mnib-7.jpg
President Rodrigo Duterte and People's Republic of China President Xi Jinping pose for posterity prior to the start of the bilateral meeting at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on April 25, 2019. King Rodriguez, Presidential Photo/File
MANILA — After drawing flak over his remark that his campaign promise for fishermen in disputed seas was a joke, President Rodrigo Duterte warned Beijing that he would not withdraw Philippine ships from disputed waters, even if China killed him.

In a taped meeting that aired on Friday, Defense Secretary Lorenzana told Duterte that the Philippines had 2 ships in the West Philippine Sea, which were roving around Kalayaan islands and Mischief Reef.
"I’d like to put notice sa China. May 2 barko ako d’yan (I have 2 ships there)… I am not ready to withdraw," the President said. "I do not want a quarrel, I do not want trouble. I respect your position, and you respect mine. But we will not go to war."
The Philippine ships "will not move an inch backward," he said.
"Hindi talaga ako aatras. Patayin mo man ako kung patayin mo ako, dito ako. Dito magtatapos ang ating pagkakaibigan," Duterte said, addressing China.

(I will not retreat. Kill me if you want to kill me, I will be here. This is where our friendship will end.)
This, two days after a Filipino fisherman in Infanta, Pangasinan took offense at Duterte's recent clarification that his 2016 campaign statement of riding a jet ski and challenging Chinese incursions in the West Philippine Sea was just a joke.
Beijing refuses to recognize a 2016 arbitral ruling that junked its "historical" claims to about 90 percent of the South China Sea, within which is the smaller West Philippine Sea.
Duterte forged friendlier relations with China upon assuming power in 2016, even setting aside the arbitral award in favor of economic aid and investments from Beijing.
Manila and Beijing's maritime dispute flared again in March, after some 200 Chinese ships swarmed Philippine waters.
The Department of Foreign Affairs has repeatedly complained to China in recent weeks about a "swarming and threatening presence" of Chinese vessels in the Philippine EEZ and has demanded they be withdrawn.
The Philippines has recently boosted its presence in the South China Sea through "sovereignty patrols," in a show of defiance that critics say has been lacking under pro-China Duterte, who has drawn domestic flak for his refusal to stand up to Beijing.

Experts say China's fleet fishing boats and coastguard are central to its strategic ambitions in the South China Sea, maintaining a constant presence that complicates fishing and offshore energy activities by other coastal states.
A retired Philippine Supreme Court justice had warned that China's swarming of the Julian Felipe Reef (Whitsun Reef) in the Kalayaan Island Group since March could be a prelude to occupation and building of a military base, as Beijing did on Mischief Reef in 1995.
Chinese officials have previously denied there are militia aboard its fishing boats as it asserts its illegal claim over almost the entire South China Sea.

– With a report from Reuters
More details to follow.
'Our friendship will end here:' Duterte tells China he won't withdraw ships from West PH Sea
 

jward

passin' thru
Navy Sending Two Guam-Based MQ-4C Tritons to Japan for Temporary Operations - USNI News
View all posts by Mallory Shelbourne →

3 minutes



49447453362_14dafbec22_b.jpg

200112-F-SX156-1006rANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE, Guam (Jan. 12, 2020) An MQ-4C Triton unmanned aircraft system (UAS) taxis after landing at Andersen Air Force Base for a deployment as part of an early operational capability (EOC) to further develop the concept of operations and fleet learning associated with operating a high-altitude, long-endurance system in the maritime domain. Unmanned Patrol Squadron (VUP) 19, the first Triton UAS squadron, will operate and maintain two aircraft in Guam under Commander, Task Force (CTF) 72, the U.S. Navy’s lead for patrol, reconnaissance and surveillance forces in U.S. 7th Fleet. (U.S. Air Force photo by Senior Airman Ryan Brooks)

The Navy is temporarily moving two MQ-4C unmanned aircraft from Guam to a base in Japan, the service announced today.
“This is the first time the MQ-4C Triton has been deployed to Japan,” U.S. Naval Forces Japan said in a news release. “The Triton is an unarmed, unmanned aerial reconnaissance system that provides the Japan-U.S. alliance with enhanced maritime surveillance capabilities.”
The service said the two aircraft, which have been operating from Guam for more than a year, will touch down in Misawa on Saturday. Naval Air Facility Misawa, located near the northern tip of Honshu island, is home to other naval aviation operations, including the P-8A Poseidon.
The Triton is an unmanned aircraft that performs maritime surveillance missions and is based on the Air Force’s RQ-4 Global Hawk.

“It allows us to create a more complete picture of what is out there versus what we think is out there” in the air and ocean space, Vice Adm. Jim Kilby, the deputy chief of naval operations for warfighting requirements and capabilities (OPNAV N9), told the House Armed Services seapower and projection forces subcommittee in March.
“So to me it’s a validation – and having been an operator in the Pacific, sometimes it corrects a mis-ID, for lack of a better word. So I think Triton will add tremendous value there,” he added.

The Navy deployed the two MQ-4C Tritons to Guam in early 2020, which was nearly a year later than expected. This will be the first time the unmanned aircraft will operate from another location in the Pacific, giving the Navy an opportunity to test out the capability over more congested waters and other different environmental factors.
In a news release earlier this month, the Japanese Defense Ministry said the Air Force’s RQ-4 Global Hawk would also head to Japan.
“U.S Forces have temporarily deployed Global Hawk … based in Guam to Japan since 2014,” the defense ministry said.

 

jward

passin' thru
Duterte w/o his machisimo face is way scarier than him with :hmm:

Philippines' Duterte Issues Gag Order Over South China Sea
By Reuters

3-4 minutes



MANILA—President Rodrigo Duterte said on Tuesday the Philippines would not waver in defense of its interests in the South China Sea, even though he had barred his ministers from talking about the situation there in public.
China’s maritime conduct has been a constant problem for Duterte but he has refrained from criticizing Beijing and instead praised its leadership, hoping to secure investment.

But after weeks of rebukes of China by his ministers over the presence of hundreds of fishing vessels in the Philippines’ Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), he told his ministers on Monday they must refrain from discussing the matter.
“If we talk, we talk but just among us,” he said in a televised address.
On Tuesday, he said his order should not be construed as weakness and that maritime patrols must continue.
“Our agencies have been directed to do what they must and should to protect and defend our nation’s interest,” Duterte said in a statement. “We will not waver in our position.”

Beijing claims almost the entire South China Sea and has built military installations equipped with missiles on reefs in disputed areas, including within the Philippine EEZ, alongside a constant presence of coastguards and fishing vessels.
Duterte’s defense and foreign ministers and his legal adviser have taken strong positions lately on what they have called a “swarming and threatening” presence of Chinese vessels they believe are manned by militias.
China’s embassy in Manila has denied the presence of militias. It did not respond to requests for comment on Monday and Tuesday.

The gag order could lessen tensions at the rhetorical level, said Aaron Jed Rabena of the Asia-Pacific Pathways to Progress, a Manila-based think tank.
“It could be that President Duterte has realized that it’s high time for his administration to speak with one voice given the mixed signals …which show a government that is incoherent,” Rabena said.
The same day Duterte announced the gag order, the foreign ministry filed another diplomatic protest against China over the annual summer fishing ban Beijing imposed in the South China Sea from May 1 to August 16, saying it was “a violation of Philippines’ sovereignty and sovereign rights.”

“And with the new Chinese coast guard law, it effectively grants Chinese coastguard freedom and authority to use force within what it considers its maritime jurisdiction,” Foreign Ministry official Marie Yvette Banzon-Abalos said.
Abalos was referring to a law that China passed in January that allowed its coast guard to fire on foreign vessels.
She said this put at risk the legitimate right of Filipino fishermen to fish in Philippine territory and the exclusive economic zone.
 

jward

passin' thru
China Is Testing A Beastly 20-Barrel Naval Gatling Gun (Updated)
Joseph Trevithick

2-3 minutes



As China's People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) continues to expand the size and capabilities of its surface fleets, including with the addition of larger, more advanced vessels, including multiple aircraft carriers and amphibious assault ships, the demand for more capable CIWSs is only likely to grow. This has already been evidenced by the addition of the new Type 1130 to the Liaoning. Though the discussion is more commonly framed around the increasing threat that advanced Chinese, as well as Russian, anti-ship missiles, including longer-range and faster-flying hypersonic and ballistic types, present to other navies, the PLAN faces the same realities.

A CIWS with a 20-barrel Gatling-type cannon with a very high rate of fire would, by definition, be able to put out more rounds, faster. This would be particularly valuable for engaging existing and future advanced anti-ship missiles, which are increasingly faster and stealthier, features that could shrink the available engagement window for close-in defenses. At the same time, unless the magazine capacity is similarly increased, this weapon might only be capable of firing a small number of total bursts before needing to be reloaded.

So, while it remains to be seen if this particular 20-barrel design will make its way into operational service, it's hardly surprising that the PLAN is looking at bigger and badder CIWSs that can spew out shells at even more blistering rates of fire as new threats continue to emerge.

UPDATE, 7:35 PM EST:
George William Herbert, an independent expert on missiles and nuclear weapons, has noticed that the side view picture of this new Chinese CIWS firing appears to show two barrels, one at the 12 o'clock position and one at the six o'clock position, firing at once. It is possible that ammunition could be fed in, and then ejected, at two separate points to support this method of operation, which would further increase the gun's overall rate of fire.

Contact the author: joe@thedrive.com
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Hummm......

Posted for fair use.....

North Korean Weapons Are Likely Here to Stay, Even if Biden Won't Say It

David E. Sanger
Fri, May 21, 2021, 5:00 AM · 9 min read

WASHINGTON — Just weeks after President Joe Biden took office, North Korea sent a subtle message to the new administration: It switched on key parts of its nuclear fuel production plant in Yongbyon, the aging complex where the country’s nuclear weapons program was born four decades ago.

North Korean officials knew the heat signatures from their radiochemical laboratory would light up American satellites overhead and make it into the President’s Daily Brief, even if it was not clear whether the move was a deceptive fake or a sustained new round of production.

“It’s part of the playbook,” said Victor Cha, who released an analysis of the images for the Center for Strategic and International Studies. “It says we are here to stay.”

The staying power of Pyongyang’s nuclear arsenal highlights an uncomfortable truth for Biden as he prepares to greet President Moon Jae-in of South Korea at the White House on Friday. Moon has said denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula is a “matter of survival” for his country, and he has called on Biden to revive negotiations.

But North Korea’s arsenal of nuclear weapons and its stockpile of fuel have roughly doubled in the past four years, a steady rise that proceeded even as President Donald Trump held high-drama meetings with Kim Jong Un, the North Korean leader. The best unclassified estimates are that the North has at least 45 nuclear weapons, and appears headed to an arsenal roughly the size of Pakistan’s, another nuclear state the United States once demanded must disarm, and now has all but given up that it ever will. For the North, that has always been a model to follow.

In private, officials in the Biden administration admit they harbor no illusions that North Korea will ever give up the entirety of its program. Yet, like his predecessors, Biden has made the decision not to officially acknowledge the North as a nuclear state, aides say.

It is a little like pretending that the New York Yankees do not play baseball. But maintaining the myth has a purpose, for both the United States and South Korea.

Any official acknowledgment that the North Korean arsenal is here to stay would revive the long-simmering debates about whether U.S. allies like South Korea and Japan can depend on the American nuclear umbrella — essentially a security net for countries that do not have nuclear weapons of their own.

Robert J. Einhorn, a former State Department official who was long a nuclear expert for the agency, said a formal acknowledgment that North Korea is a nuclear state would “increase interest by South Korea and Japan in acquiring their own nuclear weapons” and “damage the global nonproliferation regime.” So he said he expected the administration would use the visit to “reaffirm complete denuclearization” as the ultimate goal, “even if it privately doubts that goal will ever be achieved.”

For months now, the Biden administration has been engaged in a North Korean strategy review, often in consultation with South Korea and Japan. But it has offered little detail in public about its conclusions, other than to avoid trying a grand bargain with Kim that Trump did. Instead of trying to wrap a peace treaty formally ending the Korean War, the promise of a new relationship between Pyongyang and Washington, and a sweeping disarmament plan into one package, it will turn back to small, confidence-building steps.

If that seems like a familiar, step-by-step approach, it is — past presidents, including George W. Bush and Barack Obama, tried similar strategies. Agreements were reached, and sometimes facilities were destroyed — notably the cooling tower for a nuclear reactor at Yongbyon, which was blown up in front of CNN cameras. It was all for show — the facilities were rebuilt, and the North Koreans kept on producing nuclear material.

Moon’s meeting is the second in-person visit of a world leader to the White House. He was crucial in arranging the summits between Trump and Kim, and has continued to encourage dialogue between Washington and Pyongyang. While at the White House, he is expected to reiterate those goals, while emphasizing with Biden a series of South Korean investments in the United States in semiconductors and batteries for electric cars — ways of deepening the technological alliance at a moment of heightened competition with China.

The result is that Biden is not likely to dwell much on North Korea, at least in public, Cha said.

“They will change the topic,” he said.

And officials in the Biden administration have made clear they are not interested in giving Kim the satisfaction of being the center of attention, as he was during his dramatic meetings with Trump in Singapore, in Hanoi, Vietnam, and at the Demilitarized Zone.

But the Biden White House has not thrown out all of Trump’s diplomacy.

The White House says it wants to build on the “Singapore declaration,” which called for a new relationship between the United States and North Korea, a permanent peace plan, complete denuclearization and a full accounting of soldiers missing in action from a war that ended nearly seven decades ago.

The document is only one page, and it is not specific about how to achieve those objectives. Trump, speaking in Singapore in June 2018, told reporters that the relationship with Kim would make all the difference. “Honestly, I think he’s going to do these things,” he said.

For the most part, Kim has failed to follow through, though he has maintained a promised moratorium on long-range missile tests and made some progress on the return of remains. But the fact is that Kim did not dismantle a single weapon, and the nuclear production program sped up.

In the past several years, Pyongyang roughly doubled its supplies of fuel that can be turned into nuclear weapons, according to analysts. It did so mainly at the Yongbyon complex, where the nuclear program began in the 1960s. Today, the site’s many hundreds of industrial buildings cover an area of more than 3 square miles.

Siegfried S. Hecker, a former director of the Los Alamos weapons laboratory in New Mexico who is now a Stanford professor, cast the fuel rise in terms of potential weapons: In 2000, at the end of the Clinton administration, Pyongyang had no nuclear arms. In 2008, at the end of the Bush administration, it had four to six. In 2016, at the end of the Obama administration, it had roughly 25. In 2020, at the end of the Trump administration, it had about 45 and perhaps as many as 60.

“The policies of the past three presidents have failed,” Hecker said in an email. “Unless the Biden team changes course, North Korea will continue to expand the size, sophistication and reach of its nuclear arsenal.”

In size, experts say, the North’s stockpile of nuclear arms is fast approaching those of India, Pakistan and Israel — relatively small members of the club who are seen as deploying about 100 or so weapons, whereas the big players have thousands. That is the model the North is pursuing: No one expects any of those countries to give up their nuclear arsenals.

In a recent report, Brad Roberts, a Pentagon official in the Obama administration who now directs global security research at the Livermore weapons laboratory in California, said the North overall had achieved an important new stage — that of “a heavily armed nuclear state with intercontinental reach.”

Barring war or leadership change, he added, Pyongyang’s “nuclear weapons appear to be here to stay.”

On Trump’s watch, new missiles also came to life. In 2017, Pyongyang for the first time successfully test-fired two kinds of intercontinental ballistic missiles — both, in theory, able to drop warheads on the United States. In June 2018, Kim told Trump that he would stop testing his long-range missiles and nuclear arms. So far, he has kept those promises.

But Kim has also proceeded to introduce new generations of shorter-range missiles, capable of targeting South Korea, Japan and U.S. forces based in the two countries.

During the Trump years, experts were able to look at satellite images at 16 of Pyongyang’s missile bases, which were much camouflaged. They found inconspicuous patterns of growth that suggested the North had engaged in a great deception: Curbing its long-range missile program while expanding its ability to pummel nearby rivals with conventional and nuclear warheads.

Kim test fired three new missiles in 2019 and one this year. Those models, analysts say, have greater accuracy and new maneuvering powers that could help the warheads outwit American defenses in the region.

“They’ll probably end up being able to strike more targets,” Vann H. Van Diepen, a former weapons analyst for the National Intelligence Program, said of the new missiles.

The differences between the United States and North Korea on how to achieve a nuclear-free Korean Peninsula have grown all but unbridgeable over the years. But a strong voice arguing that the gap can be narrowed through continued dialogue has been Moon, who assumed the role of mediator and cheerleader during the Trump administration.

Even after the summit meetings between Kim and Trump ended without an agreement, Moon’s government insisted engagement was the only viable way to end the nuclear threat and establish peace.

In an interview in April with The New York Times, Moon urged the Biden administration to start negotiations with North Korea, and build on the broad goals outlined by Kim and Trump.

This month, after Washington released its North Korea policy review, Moon said he saw no difference between the two allies’ approach to North Korea. Both countries intended to build on the Singapore agreement and take “diplomatic, gradual, phased, practical and flexible” steps toward the ultimate goal of denuclearizing the Korean Peninsula.

When he sits down this week with Biden, Moon said, one goal would be bringing North Korea “back on the path of dialogue.”

But those mutual interests have limits. For its part, the Biden administration has aimed to deepen Washington’s strategic partnership with South Korea and draw it into the evolving U.S. strategy to compete with China. It is a delicate dance because of South Korea’s enormous trade relationship with Beijing.

U.S. officials have also accused Beijing of helping North Korea steal funds to finance its program through cybercrime.

A United Nations panel of experts released a report this year claiming North Korean hackers stole $316.4 million from 2019 to November 2020 through cyberattacks, including $281 million from a cryptocurrency exchange in September 2020. The stolen cryptocurrencies were laundered through over-the-counter brokers in China, the report said.

The fruits of the theft, many experts believe, are funding the North’s most important project: expanding the nuclear arsenal.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Hummm.....

Posted for fair use.....

Biden appoints special envoy to North Korea

BY BRETT SAMUELS - 05/21/21 06:31 PM EDT
56 Comments

President Biden on Friday appointed Sung Kim, a career diplomat with expertise on North Korea policy, to serve as a special envoy to North Korea as the administration seeks to establish diplomatic relations with the hermit nation.

Biden made the announcement alongside South Korean President Moon Jae-in during a joint press conference at the White House. The two leaders discussed climate change, China and how to address the threat of North Korea.

The Biden administration late last month completed its policy review toward North Korea, and Biden said Friday that officials "consulted closely with President Moon’s team throughout the process."

"We both are deeply concerned about the situation," Biden said. "Our two nations also shared a willingness to engage diplomatically with the D.P.R.K. to take pragmatic steps that will reduce tensions as we move toward our ultimate goal of denuclearization of the Korean peninsula," he said. "Today, I affirmed to President Moon that the U.S. will proceed in close consultation with the R.O.K. in our strategy and our approach."

Kim will serve as Biden's special envoy to North Korea. Biden officials previously said North Korea had not responded to outreach to initiate diplomatic talks. The president said Friday "total denuclearization" remains his administration's goal.

Kim previously served as ambassador to Indonesia and ambassador to the Philippines. He also served in the Obama administration as a special representative for North Korea policy and as ambassador to South Korea.

Former President Trump held two in-person summits with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un in a bid to reach a denuclearization agreement. No formal agreement was ever reached.
 

northern watch

TB Fanatic
Largest US Naval Exercise In A Generation Will Prepare For "Future Conflict With China Or Russia"

BY TYLER DURDEN
ZERO HEDGE
FRIDAY, MAY 21, 2021 - 05:00 PM

The Pentagon has unveiled what's being described as "the biggest US naval exercise in a generation" to be held in late summer and which will simulate readiness for a future "possible conflict with China or Russia," according to a new report in Military.com.

Expected to include 25,000 sailors and Marines, it comes amid a broader shift in Pentagon strategy which seeks readiness for 'great power conflict' as opposed the more limited nature of 'war on terror' missions which has defined the last two decades.


US Navy Image


Largest US Naval Exercise In A Generation Will Prepare For "Future Conflict With China Or Russia" | ZeroHedge
To include aircraft carriers, planes, and submarines, the "Large Scale Exercise 2021" will be held across seven time zones, linking up multiple global command centers with personnel from the US, Europe, Africa and the Pacific.

While exact locations of the deployed exercises are uncertain at this point, the report says that 'live forces' will operation in both the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, likely to include amphibious landing scenarios - the kind one might expect in a theoretical future conflict in the South China Sea.

"The sailors and Marines participating will test several concepts they're likely to encounter in a possible conflict with China," the report says. "Scenarios will test the sailors and Marines' ability to conduct distributed operations; expeditionary advanced-base operations; littoral operations in a contested environment; and command and control in a contested environment."

Lt. Cmdr. Tabitha Klingensmith of US Fleet Forces Command was cited in the report as saying that "training events are growing in scope and complexity" - again reflecting the move away from Mideast-focused missions and back to WWII-style scenarios of front warfare as well as major theaters.

commandsmap.png


It comes as under President Biden tensions with Beijing in the South China Sea continue to remain on edge, given also this year alone the US Navy has conducted almost a half-dozen sail-throughs of the contested Taiwan Strait, which China has condemned as "undermining stability" in the region and "illegally" signaling Taiwan independence forces.

Largest US Naval Exercise In A Generation Will Prepare For "Future Conflict With China Or Russia" | ZeroHedge
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Hummm......

Posted for fair use.....

May 23, 20217:02 AM PDT
Asia Pacific
U.S. waiting to see if North Korea wants to engage in diplomacy

Reuters

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said on Sunday the United States is waiting to see if North Korea wants to engage in diplomacy over the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula.

U.S. President Joe Biden and South Korean President Moon Jae-in on Friday injected fresh urgency into attempts to engage North Korea in dialogue over its nuclear weapons, with Biden saying he would meet its leader Kim Jong Un under the right conditions. read more
"We are waiting to see if Pyongyang actually wants to engage," Blinken said on ABC's "This Week with George Stephanopoulos" program. "The ball is in their court."

"The best chance we have to achieve the objective of total denuclearization of the Korean peninsula is to engage diplomatically with North Korea," Blinken said.

North Korea has rebuffed U.S. entreaties for diplomacy since Biden took over from Donald Trump, who had three summits with Kim and famously exchanged "beautiful letters" with the third-generation leader.
 

jward

passin' thru





Indo-Pacific News - Watching the CCP-China Threat
@IndoPac_Info

4m


#Chinese ships enter #Japanese waters off Senkakus #Japan's Coast Guard says four Chinese government ships entered Japanese territorial waters off the Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea on Monday.
2/ Coast Guard officials say the vessels intruded into the waters off Uotsuri & Taisho islands at around 4:30 pm, and they are warning the ships to leave immediately. This is the 16th time that Chinese government vessels have intruded into Japanese waters off the Senkaku Islands
View: https://twitter.com/IndoPac_Info/status/1397037906225627140?s=20
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Hummm.....

Posted for fair use.....

The U.S. Position on South Korean Missiles Just Got Interesting

MAY 25, 2021 | WALTER PINCUS

Walter Pincus is a contributing senior national security columnist for The Cipher Brief. He spent forty years at The Washington Post, writing on topics from nuclear weapons to politics.

OPINION — Last Friday, it was announced at the White House that the Biden administration had turned South Korea loose to develop whatever ballistic missiles it wants in response to North Korea’s recent testing surge of short-range, solid-propellant missiles.

For me, it was a sign that Biden is toughening up the U.S. position on Pyongyang before he tries to go back to any bargaining table.

Most Americans are unaware that Seoul governments, under a 1979 U.S.-South Korean memorandum of understanding, have been limited in the range and payload of their ballistic missile development programs in exchange for getting needed U.S. technical assistance. The original purpose 40 years ago was to prevent a Korean Peninsula arms race.

At first, the limit was a range of just over 100 miles with a 1,100-pound payload. In 2001, when South Korea joined the Missile Technology Control Regime, it negotiated an expansion of the range to 186 miles. In 2012, as the threat from North Korea grew, the range limit was expanded to 500 miles with an increased payload of one ton. For shorter ranges, the payload doubled. Last year, in response to further Pyongyang threats, the South Koreans tested a new, Hyunmoo-4 solid-fueled missile with a 500-mile range carrying an estimated two-ton payload.

So, while North Korea has been developing its nuclear weapons and its own missiles, South Korea has been growing its conventional missile force, which now has ranges that cover all of North Korea and payloads designed to destroy both North Korea’s cave-based and underground-based missile systems.

At Friday’s joint press conference with President Biden, you could see satisfaction on the face of President Moon Jae-in when he said in Korean, “It is also with pleasure that I deliver the news on the termination of the revised missile guidelines.”

Moon said more to describe the Biden administration’s “display for the world the robustness of our alliance.”

The Korean President referred to the March signing of a six-year ROK-U.S. Special Measures Agreement (SMA) under which the Seoul government will pay over $1.04 billion this year to help support the 28,500 American troops in South Korea. That amount would increase as defense expenditures rise roughly six percent a year between 2022 and 2025. When former-President Trump tried to get Korea to pay $5 billion in 2020, negotiations had halted.

Together, Biden and Moon reaffirmed in their joint statement “their mutual commitment to the defense of the Republic of Korea and their combined defense posture under the ROK-U.S. Mutual Defense Treaty.”

Then, at Friday’s press conference, Biden announced a plan to provide vaccines to the “550,000 Korean soldiers, sailors, airmen who work in close contact with American forces in Korea. We’ll provide full vaccinations for all 550,000 of those Korean forces engaging with American forces on a regular basis — both for their sake, as well as the sake of the American forces.” That’s another way to show the U.S. wants its Korean ally ready to fight.
 

Plain Jane

Just Plain Jane


America's Lone Carrier In Asia-Pacific Will Depart Region For Afghan Troop Withdrawal
Tyler Durden's Photo

BY TYLER DURDEN
THURSDAY, MAY 27, 2021 - 10:20 PM
Currently the sole US aircraft carrier based out of the Asian-Pacific, specifically with a home port in Yokosuka, Japan, is the USS Ronald Reagan - but it's now set to depart the region for the first time in years in preparation for the complete withdrawal of US troops in Afghanistan.

Pentagon officials told The Wall Street Journal the new carrier mission will see the Reagan depart Asian-Pacific waters this summer in support of ensuring a safe US troop exit from Afghanistan by the time of Biden's Sept. 11 deadline. There's growing concern that given Americans are now staying well past the previously agreed upon May 1st exit (based on the prior deal under the Trump White House), departing soldiers could face severe Taliban attacks, a scenario which is more likely the longer they stay. But now Congressional hawks worry about the glaring "gap" to be created should ongoing tensions with China escalate.
USS Ronald Reagan, via US Navy

The carrier presence is expected to assist in thwarting any such attacks via air operations or other missions which require calling in major firepower.

Lack of a carrier presence near the South and East China seas could (perhaps as an inadvertent byproduct ) actually help to cool continually rising tensions with China - hawks inevitably sounding the "alarm" notwithstanding - following over a dozen contentious sail-throughs of warships in the Taiwan Strait and waters claimed by Beijing, such as the recent Paracel island incident.

"While it is away, the Navy will go without an aircraft carrier presence in the Asia-Pacific region for at least part of that time, the officials said," WSJ describes. This strongly suggests another carrier may be later called upon to enter the waters.

"The U.S. Seventh Fleet, based in Japan, has dozens of other ships and aircraft, but the redeployment of its only available aircraft carrier represents a significant diversion away from Asia, which President Biden has called a priority for the military," WSJ continues. The current carrier operating in the Middle East, which has been active in the north Arabian sea since last month, is the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower - but it's scheduled to return to port in Virginia in July.

Already on Thursday this is sparking controversy over the largest navy in the world "not having enough ships"...

This appears part of US Central Command commander Gen. Kenneth McKenzie's promise to the Senate Armed Services Committee made last month wherein he stated, "We will bring additional resources in [to the region] in order to protect the force as it comes out" of Afghanistan, which is by far America's longest running war. "That’s normal in any kind of disengagement operation, and I don’t want to go into the detail of those operations right now, but we will have additional capabilities and I’m confident that we and our coalition partners will be able to extract ourselves," McKenzie said.

And Rabobank comments on the matter: "...at a time of heightened tensions around the South China Sea, due to the US leaving Afghanistan in July--opening up USD1-3trn in mineral resources for anyone brave enough to dive in--the US Navy is shifting the aircraft carrier Ronald Reagan to help with the logistics. For the first time in a long time, the US has no aircraft carrier in the Pacific. The symbolism is clear: and it leaves some wondering what might happen if push comes to shove."

The US has further of late reportedly beefed up its bomber presence in the Gulf region, also as the major logistical feet of pulling out a 20-year build-up of equipment and military hardware continues.
 

jward

passin' thru
:shk: :shr::shk:

Report

The Glitch That Ruined Blinken’s ASEAN Debut
The top U.S. diplomat’s first meeting with Southeast Asian ministers was thwarted for a very relatable reason.

By Colum Lynch, Jack Detsch, and Robbie Gramer
U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken arrives at Osan Air Base.

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken arrives for a two-day visit at Osan Air Base in Pyeongtaek, South Korea on March 17. Chung Sung-Jun /POOL/AFP


May 27, 2021, 3:45 PM

On May 25, Southeast Asian foreign ministers gathered in front of their computers for what was to be the first formal encounter with the Biden administration’s top diplomat, a virtual ministerial summit with U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken. But Blinken never appeared.

The United States was unable to secure a video connection for Blinken, who was boarding his plane in Shannon, Ireland, for a red-eye trip to Tel Aviv, Israel, the first leg of an emergency trip to the Middle East to try preserving the shaky cease-fire ending weeks of violence between Israelis and Palestinians.
The episode rankled some of the ministers, who viewed the technical glitch as a political slight, a sign the Americans had not invested sufficient effort in planning for the meeting and the United States was once again putting off the pivot to Asia by prioritizing other regions in the world—in this case, the Middle East.

Southeast Asia’s top diplomatic corps waited fruitlessly on the call for 45 minutes, diplomatic sources said. The incident reinforced a nagging feeling U.S. President Joe Biden’s administration, which has sought to elevate the importance of repairing alliances as part of its effort to compete with China for global influence, is sidelining the region.
A suggestion before the meeting that Blinken’s deputy, Wendy Sherman, might have to fill in for Blinken only made matters worse, according to a diplomatic source familiar with the incident. The same source said Indonesian Foreign Minister Retno Marsudi was so upset she never turned on her video feed during the meeting. “The Indonesians wanted a proper respectful meeting at foreign minister’s leave—but not by his deputy,” the diplomatic source said. At the time of publication, the Indonesian Embassy in Washington had not responded to a request for comment.

U.S. officials insisted no snub was intended and they had worked intensively over the previous weeks to make the meeting happen despite resistance from Myanmar’s military regime, which holds that country’s seat at the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Blinken, they noted, had been prepared to work late into the night to address his Southeast Asian counterparts even as he prepared for a round of crisis diplomacy in the Middle East. U.S. State Department staff delivered a profuse apology to the ministers on behalf of Blinken. A follow-up ministerial meeting has been rescheduled for next week.
“The administration is committed to ASEAN centrality and ASEAN’s essential role in the Indo-Pacific architecture,” U.S. State Department spokesperson Ned Price told Foreign Policy. “That commitment is reflected in more than a dozen high-level calls and in-person meetings.”

“The White House takes our engagement with ASEAN very seriously,” said a National Security Council spokesperson, who pointed to a series of high-level meetings the United States has planned in the near future with ASEAN on a range of issues. “We’ve said it from the earliest days of the administration, when National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan virtually met with ASEAN ambassadors, and it remains true today: The Biden administration is committed to expanding U.S. engagement with ASEAN.”

The latest incident follows a long history of bruised Southeast Asian diplomatic sensitivities. A succession of U.S. presidents dating back to George H. W. Bush left the impression they were granting the region short shrift, said Joshua Kurlantzick, an expert on the region at the Council on Foreign Relations. Biden has yet to have an official phone conversation with one of ASEAN’s 10 leaders, though other top administration officials have.

 

jward

passin' thru





Indo-Pacific News - Watching the CCP-China Threat
@InoPac_Info

7m


Biden’s Asia Czar Says Era of Engagement With #China Is Over “The period that was broadly described as engagement has come to an end,” Kurt Campbell, the #US coordinator for #IndoPacific affairs on the National Security Council, said Wednesday.
2/ Chinese policies under Xi are in large part responsible for the shift in US policy, Campbell said, citing military clashes on China’s border with India, an “economic campaign” against Australia & the rise of “wolf warrior” diplomacy. Beijing is shifting towards “harsh power.”
View: https://twitter.com/IndoPac_Info/status/1398138774459015172?s=20
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment

Indo-Pacific News - Watching the CCP-China Threat
@InoPac_Info

7m


Biden’s Asia Czar Says Era of Engagement With #China Is Over “The period that was broadly described as engagement has come to an end,” Kurt Campbell, the #US coordinator for #IndoPacific affairs on the National Security Council, said Wednesday.
2/ Chinese policies under Xi are in large part responsible for the shift in US policy, Campbell said, citing military clashes on China’s border with India, an “economic campaign” against Australia & the rise of “wolf warrior” diplomacy. Beijing is shifting towards “harsh power.”
View: https://twitter.com/IndoPac_Info/status/1398138774459015172?s=20

Hummm......I wonder how smoothly that's going to play out?......Merde.....
 

Melodi

Disaster Cat
On the Blikin problems with internet connections at Shannon Airport:

"Welcome to the wonderful world of Irish Internet Service. We have two main carriers for your pleasure, and all our companies work on the back of the old State Telephone network which is now privatized and therefore saves money by delaying repairs and maintenance.

We have amazing broadband speeds as any system established about 2010 and we even have 4G networks in some of the rural countryside where Shannon Airport is located.

Should you actually require an advanced Internet connection, we suggest you contact Elon Musk about beta testing his new Starlink network in the skies.

Have a nice day and thank you for using any Irish Internet Service!"
 

jward

passin' thru
China Warns Australia's Military Is "Weak", Will Be "First Hit" In Any War With Western Alliance
by Tyler Durden

4-5 minutes


Following now completed joint war games held by the US, Japan, France and Australia in the East China Sea off the southwest coast of Japan earlier this month, China has lashed out particularly at its large regional neighbor Australia, calling its military "weak" and "insignificant" at a moment the two are locked in a severe trade and diplomatic tit-for-tat dispute.

Beijing voiced specific threats and warnings via its state-run English language mouthpiece Global Times, which recently wrote, "Australia's military is too weak to be a worthy opponent of China, and if it dares to interfere in a military conflict for example in the Taiwan Straits, its forces will be among the first to be hit."
ARC 21 exercise off the coast of Kagoshima, Japan in mid-May. Image: US Marine Corps
"Australia must not think it can hide from China if it provokes," the report continued with its threats. "Australia is within range of China's conventional warhead-equipped DF-26 intermediate-range ballistic missile."
Exercise Jeanne d'Arc 21 - or ARC21, as the Western alliance called it, also featured rare amphibious assault landing drills, which is seen as aimed at challenging China's expansive claims over regional island-chains and contested reef areas on which it's built up military installations.
Here's more from the GT column's response...
The ongoing joint exercises by Japanese, US, French and Australian troops, claimed to "serve as a deterrent to China," is only symbolic and of little military significance, as the drill was put together by participants that have different agenda or are too weak, experts said on Wednesday, while slamming Japan's outdated mindset of rallying alliances for confrontation.
The People's Liberation Army (PLA) doesn't even need to make pointed responses to the joint drill since it's insignificant militarily.
Japan was also focus of China's media attacks over the exercise as it was warned not to let its historic "militarism come back to life".
Sobering assessment by @MOFA_Taiwan foreign minister that China is "preparing for war." To be clear though, Beijing has never stopped preparing for war since 1949. Recent surge in military activities & possibility of domestic upheaval causes for concern. Taiwan's foreign minister says China is 'preparing for war.' Here's Taiwan's response plan
— Russell Hsiao (@lcrhsiao) May 26, 2021
Also at a sensitive moment its hosting the summer Olympics is in question, the article called for Tokyo not to get distracted from the more pressing pandemic and health crisis in its midst:
Despite its severe domestic COVID-19 situation, Japan remains stubborn in hooking in "like-minded" countries for joint military exercises, which is an outdated Cold War mindset and will only build divisions and confrontation, Zhang Junshe, a senior research fellow at the PLA Naval Military Studies Research Institute, told the Global Times on Wednesday.
As an invading country defeated in World War II, why is Japan holding offensive exercises like this? Zhang asked. "Japan should learn from history and not let militarism come back to life."
All of this comes as the United States also this week announced it will send its only Asia-Pacific carrier presence to Mideast waters in order to assist with the Afghanistan withdrawal this summer - a move which Republican Congressional hawks lamented as leaving the US exposed in a "priority theater".
Rabobank noted on the USS Ronald Reagan's impending departure from waters off Japan that "For the first time in a long time, the US has no aircraft carrier in the Pacific. The symbolism is clear: and it leaves some wondering what might happen if push comes to shove."

posted for fair use
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Posted for fair use.....

Lockheed Martin: US Will Approve if Indonesia Buys Full Package of Latest F-16 Jets

MAY 29, 2021

Jakarta. Defense and technology company Lockheed Martin has confirmed that the United States government will not stand in the way if Indonesia acquires the latest version of F-16 fighter jets and their advanced weaponry system.

The Indonesian Air Force has been operating F-16 for decades and another procurement of the multi-role jets will be much more cost-effective for the country’s long-term defense program, according to Mike Kelley, the company’s director for F-16 business development.

Lockheed Martin is offering Indonesia F-16 Block 72 jets, the latest version of the F-16 with “cutting-edge technology in the most advanced F-16 configuration on the market today”.

“If Indonesia chose an aircraft other than the F-16, it would be much more costly to build up that new ecosystem to support another platform, from infrastructure on the ground, to training of pilots and maintenance crews,” Kelley said in a recent interview with a number of Indonesian media outlets including The Jakarta Globe.

“With the F-16, that infrastructure and knowledge is already there. This saves significant cost as well as time it takes to get up to speed.”

He said the US government remains the decision-maker in arms exports and in this case Indonesia has been given the green light.

“Indonesia has been approved by the U.S. Government to receive all advanced Block 72 capabilities and weapons requested by the IDAF [Indonesian Air Force], including the advanced AESA radar,” he said, adding that Lockheed Martin is not part of that decision-making process.

The Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar is an array of the avionics technology infusion including mission computers and display processors, a large-format 6x8 high-resolution display, an internal electronic warfare system, a high-volume, high-speed data network and incorporates a sophisticated data link, according to Lockheed Martin website.

“The Foreign Military Sales process, or what you may hear referred to as the “FMS” process, is the US government’s program for making those decisions, as well as the actual contracting and transfer of the defense products and programs,” Kelley explained.

“Basically, this means that the international partner has a contract with the US government for its defense procurement, and the US government in turn handles that contract with Lockheed Martin. This ensures a highly transparent process that clearly defines all aspects of the program and partnership,” he added.

Lars Hubert, a veteran F-16 pilot, said a major advantage that comes with the F-16 Block 72 is the familiarity for Indonesian pilots.

“What does that do for Indonesian pilots? Their transition will be more rapid and certainly more efficient,” Hubert said.

Having flown the F-16 for most of his 25-year career with the US Air Force, Hubert said there are essentially over 200 upgrades he has seen in this aircraft in recent years.

“The AESA radar provides an amazing capability, seeing targets at further ranges. And I can get a track quality out of each of those detects, which is more precise,” said Hubert, whose callsign is Yeti when in the air.

Indonesia has around 30 F-16 jets, all manufactured in the 1980s.

In October 2019, Air Force Chief of Staff Air Marshal Yuyu Sutisna said the government mulled procuring “two squadrons” of F-16 Block 72 but the plan has not been materialized nearly two years after his remarks.

Indonesia also operates a number of Russia’s Sukhoi jets.
 
Top