ALERT The Winds of War Blow in Korea and The Far East

OldArcher

Has No Life - Lives on TB

The CCP can FOAD- as soon as possible. It could die, and people worldwide would rejoice... Buying goods or services, supporting the CCP, should be a treasonable action, punishable by death.

Lock & Load

OldArcher
 

jward

passin' thru
Indo-Pacific News
@IndoPac_Info

1h

#US must defeat #China's 'D-Day' trade attack on #Australia Amid our post-election chaos, China is advancing its effort to secure hegemony across the #IndoPacific region. We ignore this activity at great peril to our allies, economy, security & values
View: https://twitter.com/IndoPac_Info/status/1325086118501474305?s=20


article posted in full below:
US must defeat China's 'D-Day' trade attack on Australia

by Tom Rogan, Commentary Writer |

| November 05, 2020 11:58 AM


Print this article











Amid our own modest post-election chaos, China is advancing its effort to secure hegemony across the Indo-Pacific region. We ignore this activity at great peril to our allies, economy, security, and values.

One of America's closest allies, Australia, is again in the Communist Party's sights. As the Sydney Morning Herald notes, "Australian businesses across the seafood, wine, barley, sugar, copper, coal and timber industries are bracing for a sudden halt to their exports to China on Friday." One Australian trade official referred to this as a potential "D-Day" scale attack on the nation's $120 billion export market to China.

The effects are already being felt, with a major Australian lobster delivery being forced to rot on a Chinese runway earlier this week after customs officials refused to approve its importation. The Sydney Morning Herald points out that "The Australian industries targeted by Chinese authorities have produce that can be sourced from elsewhere and are not seen as critical to China's economic recovery."

Indeed.

Still, in a totally unsurprising act of hypocrisy (I'll write more on this later), China was, at the same time, touting its openness at an import exposition in Shanghai. Speaking there, Xi Jinping declared that "China will stay committed to openness, cooperation, and unity for win-win results. We will steadfastly expand all-round opening up ... Our aim is to turn the China market into a market for the world, a market shared by all, and a market accessible to all. This way, we will be able to bring more positive energy to the global community."

The truth of China's economic policy towards Australia and all other nations, from Canada to Eastern Europe to Africa, is one of unbridled bullying. This is not a regime with any interest in a "shared market" full of "positive energy." Rather, it is a Communist authoritarian regime that uses trade as a means to consolidate its domestic authority and advance its global power.

That latter concern explains why Australia is being punished right now. It's because Australia, more than any other nation, has had the moral and political courage to join America in restraining China's imperial gambit. Australia knows that China's effort to make the South China Sea its own private swimming pool, subjugate the region, and undermine Australian democracy is similar to that of another imperial power in the 1930s and 1940s. Over the longer term, China aims to use its established dominance to impose a political and economic feudal lordship over Australia.

The United States should not be an idle witness to what Beijing is doing.

President Trump has made his mark on the world by finally unleashing American power to counter China's imperialism. Joe Biden often speaks of the need to restore alliances and America's global credibility. Witnessing what China is now doing to one of our closest allies, each man has reason to act in Australia's support. China is banking on Washington's distraction. Instead, Trump and Biden should pledge to impose immediate new and reciprocal tariffs on China, should Beijing's D-Day attack go forward.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Posted for fair use.....

North Korea and Biological Weapons: Assessing the Evidence

Executive Summary


38-North-SR-2011-Elisa-Harris_cover-232x300.jpg
North Korea’s announcement that it is developing a vaccine for COVID-19 has focused renewed attention on Pyongyang’s purported biological weapons (BW) program. Over the past three years, three major news stories on the North Korean BW threat have been published in the United States, most recently by Politico in July 2020.


This report discusses what the two countries with the greatest security interests on the Korean Peninsula, the United States and the Republic of Korea, have said publicly on the issue over the past 20 years. It also examines whether the policy responses adopted by the two governments have been consistent with concerns that North Korea has an advanced BW program, as these media reports have claimed. Five themes emerge from this review:


  • Many of the terms used by the US government in discussing the possibility that North Korea and other countries are developing or possess biological weapons are highly ambiguous. This is especially true of the term “biological warfare program,” which the US has used repeatedly for decades without ever defining what constitutes such a program. However, based on a definition by United Nations (UN) inspectors investigating Iraq’s BW activities, probably the most that can be said in the case of North Korea is that it may have or have had a BW program.
  • There is a high degree of uncertainty about what the purported North Korean BW program actually entails. This is reflected in the many qualifications used by US government agencies in their public comments on the North Korean program. Even more uncertainty surrounds what is known, or what US officials are willing to say publicly, about actual North Korean stocks of biological weapons. The same uncertainty has been apparent in South Korean government reports on the North Korean BW threat over the last 14 years.
  • There is a lack of consistency in the public assessments of the US and South Korean governments or between the assessments and the policy responses of those governments. The most striking US example of this is the inconsistency in the State Department’s unclassified arms control reports, which have gone from charging North Korea with having a mature offensive BW program to focusing for nearly a decade simply on the DPRK’s biological research and development (R&D) infrastructure to, more recently, repeating its BW accusations from 20 years earlier. South Korea, for its part, has gone from accusing North Korea of maintaining BW facilities and stocks to referring only to BW agents the DPRK is able or suspected of being able to develop and produce.
  • There have been conflicting assessments between government agencies on the North Korean BW issue. For example, after 12 years of not mentioning the subject in the annual threat assessment testimony to Congress, in 2018, the director of national intelligence (DNI) reiterated earlier statements regarding the ability of North Korea’s biotechnology infrastructure to support a BW program. However, in 2019, the DNI said nothing on the subject, even as the State Department was charging North Korea with developing, producing and possibly weaponizing BW agents.
  • Most importantly, the US government has finally acknowledged what has been clear for many years—that the US has only fragmented insight into North Korea’s BW capabilities and intentions. This is, in part, a reflection of the challenges posed by collecting intelligence on facilities, equipment and materials that can be used for both civilian and military purposes. Moreover, given the closed nature of North Korean society, it is unlikely that the US or South Korean governments would know without reliable sources on the ground whether North Korea has given BW development and production a high degree of priority.

In the final analysis, North Korea may once have had and may still be pursuing a biological weapons capability. It is also possible that North Korea never moved beyond R&D on biological agents and the establishment of a biotechnical infrastructure that could support future BW production. It is also possible that the North Korean program never moved beyond planning or, whatever its previous nature, the program has essentially ended. But one thing seems clear—nothing in the official public record to date indicates that North Korea has an advanced BW program, notwithstanding media reports to the contrary.


Download PDF
Download "North Korea and Biological Weapons: Assessing the Evidence," by Elisa D. Harris

Related Articles
North Korea and Biological Weapons: Assessing the Evidence

Elisa D. Harris
Living With a Nuclear-Arming North Korea: Deterrence Decisions in a Deteriorating Threat Environment

Brad Roberts
IAEA Safeguards in North Korea: Possible Verification Roles and Mandates

John Carlson
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Posted for fair use.....

Peeking under the shroud of North Korea’s Monster Missile

by Joshua Pollack | November 5, 2020 | No Comments
Some unresolved questions surround the huge new mobile missiles that North Korea showed off in last month’s parade. Most of all: what will they carry, and when will the North Koreans reveal it through flight-testing?
50473938723_a05f253399_k-1024x683.jpg
Halloween came early this year.
Let’s start with what we can observe. The external characteristics of the weapon are consistent with a two-stage, liquid-propelled ICBM. In many ways, it’s similar to the Hwasong-15, which North Korea tested in 2017, but on a larger scale. My CNS colleagues estimate that the new missile is about 25 m long, compared to the roughly 20 m-long HS-15. It has a first stage of about 2.4 m in diameter, compared to the approximately 2.1 m diameter of the HS-15.

Like the HS-15, the Monster Missile features a “skirt” at the base of its first stage, suggesting a cluster of gimbaled engines, and an evocatively named “shroud” over its payload section at the front. That’s a hollow cover that pops off after the missile leaves the atmosphere, allowing whatever the missile carries to deploy.

As Mike Elleman and Vann van Diepen were quick to observe, the HS-15 already appears capable of sending a heavy payload to anyplace on the mainland of these United States. It follows that the new missile wasn’t built for greater range, but to carry a bigger, heavier payload. Which means… what?

Even before the parade, veteran intelligence analysts Markus Garlauskas and Bruce Perry noted that the logical next step for the North Korean ICBM program would be to deploy multi-warhead missiles in order to thwart U.S. missile defenses. Ensuring that North Korea’s nuclear weapons can penetrate the American “shield” may be what Kim Jong Un meant when he said in 2017 that “our final goal is to establish the equilibrium of real force [or “effective balance of power”] with the U.S. and make the U.S. rulers dare not talk about [a] military option for the DPRK.”

The U.S. pioneered the multiple reentry vehicle (MRV) concept in the early 1960s, followed by the multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle (MIRV). The Soviet Union caught up with their own versions within a decade or so. You could think of MRV as nuclear grapeshot, spraying a handful of bombs across one area. MIRV is more precise and more adaptable; it involves a small rocket engine called a post-boost vehicle, or “bus,” that pushes each warhead it carries onto a selected course, sending them to different targets if desired.

Some combination of multiple warheads and missile-defense countermeasures–chaff, decoys, and so forth–has become the favorite in this morbid little guessing game. If they’re ambitious, perhaps the North Koreans might be trying to replicate Britain’s Chevaline payload, which was designed to let its Polaris missiles thwart nuclear-tipped interceptors placed around Moscow. Chevaline was a two-warhead system with a post-boost vehicle that dispensed countermeasures into various patterns in space. It’s also rather well-documented today, as these things go.
chevaline_rvs_with_3dqp.jpg
Chevaline. Source is here.
There’s another possibility that I’ve yet to see explored at length, though. Let’s call it a dark horse. It’s another approach to beating missile defense, and one that requires a heavy payload, but no more than a single warhead per missile. That’s the fractional orbital bombardment system (FOBS).

FOBS was a Soviet innovation, brought to fruition in the mid-1960s, before the USSR developed its own multiple-warhead missiles. It involved a modified ICBM that launched its payload into low earth orbit. When the payload approached its target, an onboard retro-rocket would fire, deorbiting the warhead.

The advantage of FOBS was its ability to circumvent NORAD’s lines of early-warning radars in Canada. The FOBS weapon could be launched in any direction, allowing the USSR to launch an attack over the South Pole if desired.
800px-Dew_line_1960.jpg
NORAD’s early warning radars, ca. 1960. Source is here.

Today’s early-warning radars don’t just provide warning; they also supply crucial data to the Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD). These radars are located in Alaska, Greenland, the UK, California, and Massachusetts, pointing north, west, and east, whereas the interceptors themselves are mostly in Alaska, waiting for an attack from the north. Thus, the same old FOBS concept remains applicable. It’s even enjoying new life in Russia, whose president has said that the Sarmat multi-warhead missile can attack over either the North or the South Pole.

With the ability to attack in FOBS mode, North Korea could compel the United States to an unhappy choice: either build what amounts to a substantially new, south-facing defensive architecture, or accept that it cannot physically prevent nuclear attack from Pyongyang, even under the sunniest of assumptions about GMD’s performance.

Even if North Korea is building a FOBS today, its leaders probably anticipate a transition to MIRV in time, following the Soviet precedent. But FOBS could have certain advantages for now. First, the technology simply might be more rapidly attainable. Second, sticking with just one warhead per missile demands less fissile material. Third, it also avoids creating pressure to return to nuclear testing to demonstrate the smaller, lighter warheads most suited to MRV or MIRV. Fourth, being able to deorbit a payload essentially anywhere means that North Korea could finally conduct a fully realistic and instrumented test of an intercontinental-class reentry vehicle on its own territory, or close to its own shores; they’d just have to fly one all the way around the world.

There’s an uncomfortably large chance that we’ll find out soon what the Monster Missile hides under that shroud. A transition to a Biden administration on January 20, 2021 gives Kim Jong Un an incentive to try to demonstrate the existence of an “effective balance of power” beforehand, since it might strengthen his hand without directly challenging the newly inaugurated president. Kim has set the 8th Workers’ Party Congress for January as well; the success of a “new strategic weapon”–either real success or merely alleged–could set the stage for changes in governing structures and the direction of policy.

Whatever does happen, I can’t see any benefits from sitting back and waiting for North Korea to demonstrate the ability to overcome GMD by whatever means. That will mean bargaining for the reaffirmation of Kim Jong Un’s April 2018 pledge not to test long-range missiles or nuclear devices, which he declared a dead letter in January of this year. How that will work will be up to the new team in Washington, but the sooner they decide on their approach, the better.

(For more on this subject, see the April 2019 CNS report, Options for a Verifiable Freeze on North Korea’s Missile Programs.)
 

jward

passin' thru




Global: MilitaryInfo
@Global_Mil_Info

3h

A Biden Administration's policy towards North Korea:
- Strengthen the alliance with South Korea.
- Seek NK disarmament
- push them back to the table
. - No pursuit of diplomatic talks with KJU without securing concessions from Pyongyang first.
- Coordinate with China.
 

jward

passin' thru
hmm.

Indo-Pacific News
@IndoPac_Info

1h

#China's #SouthChinaSea Man-Made Islands Could Collapse Into the Sea “Rumors say the islands’ concrete is crumbling & their foundations turning to sponge in a hostile climate. And that is before considering what a direct hit from a super-typhoon might do”
View: https://twitter.com/IndoPac_Info/status/1325397932749725697?s=20

Since 2013 the Chinese government has dredged and mostly destroyed ecologically delicate reefs in disputed waters in order to build seven major military bases complete with ports, airstrips and radar and missile installations.
Between 2013 and 2016, huge construction vessels pulverized the reefs in order to create the raw materials for the bases. The dredger Tianjing alone shifted 4,500 cubic metres of materials every hour, “enough to nearly fill two Olympic-size swimming pools,”
 

OldArcher

Has No Life - Lives on TB
hmm.

Indo-Pacific News
@IndoPac_Info

1h

#China's #SouthChinaSea Man-Made Islands Could Collapse Into the Sea “Rumors say the islands’ concrete is crumbling & their foundations turning to sponge in a hostile climate. And that is before considering what a direct hit from a super-typhoon might do”
View: https://twitter.com/IndoPac_Info/status/1325397932749725697?s=20

Since 2013 the Chinese government has dredged and mostly destroyed ecologically delicate reefs in disputed waters in order to build seven major military bases complete with ports, airstrips and radar and missile installations.
Between 2013 and 2016, huge construction vessels pulverized the reefs in order to create the raw materials for the bases. The dredger Tianjing alone shifted 4,500 cubic metres of materials every hour, “enough to nearly fill two Olympic-size swimming pools,”

The CCP and PLAN/PLA are absolute fools... Anybody that works with Elementals, knows not to fu%k with Mother Nature... You can be sure that the sylphs and dryads are also pissed... They, the CCP, will pay, and pay big for this desecration of Gaia’s oceans, and on land, her rivers and lakes... Glad I’m not there...

Lock & Load

OldArcher
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
The CCP and PLAN/PLA are absolute fools... Anybody that works with Elementals, knows not to fu%k with Mother Nature... You can be sure that the sylphs and dryads are also pissed... They, the CCP, will pay, and pay big for this desecration of Gaia’s oceans, and on land, her rivers and lakes... Glad I’m not there...

Lock & Load

OldArcher

This is the same bunch that gave China the "Cultural Revolution" and the "Great Leap Forward". That and professional grade civil engineering placed under such a regime demands, regardless of ecological soundness, gives such results.
 

jward

passin' thru
Annual project for U.S. Marines to train Taiwanese troops goes ahead
11/09/2020 05:02 PM

Listen

Members of the United States Marine Corps during a drill in India. Photo from facebook.com/marines
Taipei, Nov. 9 (CNA) A group of U.S. Marine Corps instructors are visiting Taiwan as part of an annual project to help train Taiwanese troops to beef up their combat preparedness, a military source told CNA Monday.
The source, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that all the instructors completed their required two-week quarantine before beginning their training sessions.

The source made the comments in response to a local media report that said the instructors were scheduled to begin training Taiwanese Marines and amphibious special force units in assault boat and speedboat infiltration operations for four weeks at the Tsoying Naval Base in Kaohsiung, starting Monday.
The session marks the first military exchange between Taiwanese troops and those of an allied country since the COVID-19 pandemic put a halt to such interaction about seven to eight months ago, according to the Chinese-language United Daily News.
The Navy Command Headquarters said in a press release that routine Taiwan-U.S. military exchanges and cooperation are taking place as usual in the name of maintaining regional peace and stability.
(By Matt Yu and Joseph Yeh)

Enditem/J

posted for fair use
 

jward

passin' thru
(2nd LD) S. Korea launches new 3,000-ton-class SLBM submarine

All News 16:25 November 10, 2020


(ATTN: RECASTS headline, lead to highlight new features; ADDS more info in paras 5, 12)
By Oh Seok-min
GEOJE, South Korea, Nov. 10 (Yonhap) -- South Korea launched a new 3,000-ton-class indigenous submarine on Tuesday capable of firing submarine-launched ballistic missiles in an effort to boost underwater defense capabilities.
The ceremony for the mid-class diesel-powered submarine, named after a prominent Korean independent fighter, Ahn Mu, took place at the Okpo Shipyard of Daewoo Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering Co. in the southeastern city of Geoje.
South Korea's new 3,000-ton indigenous submarine, Ahn Mu, is anchored at the Okpo Shipyard of Daewoo Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering Co. in the southeastern city of Geoje on Nov. 10, 2020, as the Navy prepares to hold a launching ceremony the same day for the mid-class diesel-powered submarine, named after a prominent Korean independence fighter. (Yonhap)

1 of 2

It is the second of three 3,000-ton-class Changbogo-III Batch-I submarines that South Korea plans to build by 2023 with its own technologies under a 3.09 trillion won (US$2.77 billion) project launched in 2007. The first submarine, the Dosan Ahn Chang-ho, was launched in 2018 and is expected to be put into operational deployment around the end of this year.

The 83.3-meter-long and 9.6-meter-wide latest submarine is capable of carrying 50 crewmembers and can operate underwater for 20 days without surfacing, officials of the Defense Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA) said, adding that it is scheduled to be delivered to the Navy in December 2022 and be deployed in January 2024.
It is equipped with six vertical launching tubes capable of firing submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), which is expected to further beef up the country's defense capabilities, according to military officials.

Key equipment of the new submarine, including advanced combat and sonar system, was developed with the country's own technologies, with 76 percent of the parts being made by Korean businesses, the arms procurement agency said.
"As history tells us, peace is not just given for free. It should be made by ourselves based upon strong power," Defense Minister Suh Wook said during the ceremony, which was attended by around 50 people, including the general's descendants, Navy Chief of Staff Boo Suk-jong and Daewoo officials.

"I am sure that the Ahn Mu will surely contribute to peace on the Korean Peninsula and in the whole world," Suh said, vowing to maintain a firm defense readiness posture to support the denuclearization of North Korea and the establishment of a lasting peace.
The naming carries significance, as this year marks the centennial of the historic Bongo-dong and Cheongsan-ri battles that took place in northeastern China in 1920, where Gen. Ahn led Korean independent fighters and defeated Japanese soldiers.
The general sustained gunshot wounds after an ambush attack by Japanese officers, and he was arrested in 1924. He died that year.

Currently, South Korea operates nine 1,200-ton-class submarines and nine 1,800-ton ones.
North Korea is believed to have 70 subs, most of which are known to be outdated and unfit for operations beyond coastal waters. It has been working to build a new submarine believed to be a 3,000-ton one capable of carrying SLBMs.

graceoh@yna.co.kr


 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
(2nd LD) S. Korea launches new 3,000-ton-class SLBM submarine

All News 16:25 November 10, 2020


(ATTN: RECASTS headline, lead to highlight new features; ADDS more info in paras 5, 12)
By Oh Seok-min
GEOJE, South Korea, Nov. 10 (Yonhap) -- South Korea launched a new 3,000-ton-class indigenous submarine on Tuesday capable of firing submarine-launched ballistic missiles in an effort to boost underwater defense capabilities.
The ceremony for the mid-class diesel-powered submarine, named after a prominent Korean independent fighter, Ahn Mu, took place at the Okpo Shipyard of Daewoo Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering Co. in the southeastern city of Geoje.
South Korea's new 3,000-ton indigenous submarine, Ahn Mu, is anchored at the Okpo Shipyard of Daewoo Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering Co. in the southeastern city of Geoje on Nov. 10, 2020, as the Navy prepares to hold a launching ceremony the same day for the mid-class diesel-powered submarine, named after a prominent Korean independence fighter. (Yonhap)

1 of 2

It is the second of three 3,000-ton-class Changbogo-III Batch-I submarines that South Korea plans to build by 2023 with its own technologies under a 3.09 trillion won (US$2.77 billion) project launched in 2007. The first submarine, the Dosan Ahn Chang-ho, was launched in 2018 and is expected to be put into operational deployment around the end of this year.

The 83.3-meter-long and 9.6-meter-wide latest submarine is capable of carrying 50 crewmembers and can operate underwater for 20 days without surfacing, officials of the Defense Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA) said, adding that it is scheduled to be delivered to the Navy in December 2022 and be deployed in January 2024.
It is equipped with six vertical launching tubes capable of firing submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), which is expected to further beef up the country's defense capabilities, according to military officials.

Key equipment of the new submarine, including advanced combat and sonar system, was developed with the country's own technologies, with 76 percent of the parts being made by Korean businesses, the arms procurement agency said.
"As history tells us, peace is not just given for free. It should be made by ourselves based upon strong power," Defense Minister Suh Wook said during the ceremony, which was attended by around 50 people, including the general's descendants, Navy Chief of Staff Boo Suk-jong and Daewoo officials.

"I am sure that the Ahn Mu will surely contribute to peace on the Korean Peninsula and in the whole world," Suh said, vowing to maintain a firm defense readiness posture to support the denuclearization of North Korea and the establishment of a lasting peace.
The naming carries significance, as this year marks the centennial of the historic Bongo-dong and Cheongsan-ri battles that took place in northeastern China in 1920, where Gen. Ahn led Korean independent fighters and defeated Japanese soldiers.
The general sustained gunshot wounds after an ambush attack by Japanese officers, and he was arrested in 1924. He died that year.

Currently, South Korea operates nine 1,200-ton-class submarines and nine 1,800-ton ones.
North Korea is believed to have 70 subs, most of which are known to be outdated and unfit for operations beyond coastal waters. It has been working to build a new submarine believed to be a 3,000-ton one capable of carrying SLBMs.

graceoh@yna.co.kr



MADEX-2019-DSME-On-Track-with-KSS-III-Batch-2-Submarine-Program-for-ROK-Navy-1-770x410.jpg


images


for more comparison....

f3c522524cba06c6624ddc599e11656b.png

 

OldArcher

Has No Life - Lives on TB
..hmm.. have not seen that rumour but I imagine lots of frogs are stretching their legs bout now eh..
Indo-Pacific News Retweeted

Bonnie Glaser / 葛來儀
@BonnieGlaser

11h

These rumors that the US is planning to attack a Chinese-held island in the South China Sea are rubbish. The question is why is China pushing this narrative?

To give their people, and their allies, justification for launching attacks on America and it’s allies. Think Hitler and Poland...

Lock & Load

OldArcher
 

northern watch

TB Fanatic
Taiwan Announces Military Exercises With U.S. Marines

Marine-Exercises-736x490.jpg

U.S. Marines take part in joint amphibious military training with Japan in 2015 / Getty Images

Jack Beyrer - November 10, 2020 4:05 PM
Free Beacon

Taiwan announced on Monday the arrival of U.S. Marines participating in joint exercises, marking the first public acknowledgment of military exercises with U.S. forces in over 40 years.

Amphibious joint exercises between U.S. Marine Raiders and the Taiwanese Marine Corps began in Taiwan this week and were described as "routine" by Taiwan’s Naval Command, the first admission of direct Taiwanese-American military cooperation since 1979, according to Newsweek. Taiwanese soldiers will receive a month of amphibious training under the U.S. Marines
.

"In order to maintain regional peace and stability, routine security cooperation and exchanges between the militaries of Taiwan and the United States are proceeding as usual," the Taiwanese Navy said in a statement.

Oriana Skylar Mastro, China expert at the American Enterprise Institute, described the announcement from Taiwan as rare. "There has always been an element of training to the U.S.-Taiwan relationship, but boots on the ground is rare," she said. "And publicizing it is unheard of."

Since the normalization of relations between Beijing and Washington in 1979, neither the United States nor Taiwan have generally acknowledged joint military exercises between the two countries. The move comes during a time of concern over the prospect of a future invasion of Taiwan, as China escalates its public pressure campaign on the island country.

In response to escalation, the Trump administration has sent two senior diplomats to Taiwan in the past year and approved the sale of American rocket and missile systems to Taiwan.

Experts have expressed concern that efforts to secure Taiwan's defense could be upended by a potential Biden administration. Joe Biden and some of his key foreign policy advisers have a history of lukewarm support for the Taiwanese cause. In 2001, Biden wrote in an op-ed that committing to Taiwan's defense could "draw us into a war across the Taiwan Strait."

 

jward

passin' thru
New Evidence Suggests North Korea has a Naval Marine Mammal Program
By: H I Sutton
November 12, 2020 4:57 PM



HI Sutton Image Used with Permission
Evidence is emerging that the North Korean regime is training dolphins for military purposes, according to new satellite imagery.

While the U.S. Navy pioneered the training of dolphins and other marine mammals for naval purposes and has a program based in San Diego, it’s not a capability most navies can afford. To date, only the Russian Navy, with bases in the Arctic and Black Sea, has followed suit.
Based on image intelligence, North Korea’s program dates back at least to October 2015. Their first appearance was at the site of a major naval display in Nampo, a naval base and port city on the west coast. The program is likely part of the widespread modernization of the navy that has taken place under North Korean leader Kim Jong Un.
The animal pens were spotted in satellite imagery in the brown waters between a shipyard and a coal loading pier. This location may still be in use intermittently, possibly for training with the naval units based nearby. But the main activity moved to a site further up the river on the edge of town. This base, possibly where the dolphins are bred, began its development in October 2016.

The U.S. Navy and Russian Navy programs provide a good frame of reference. In America, dolphins and sea lions have been trained. Russia uses Beluga whales, dolphins and seals. The U.S. Navy has deployed them in Vietnam and the Persian Gulf. More recently, Russia may have deployed them to the war in Syria. The Beluga whale that turned up in Norway was likely part of the Russian Navy program. What it was doing off the Norwegian coast is open to discussion.
Comparisons to the marine mammal pens used by the U.S. Navy and Russian Navy suggest that the North Korean pens are sized for dolphins.
It’s also possible that the pens are some type of fish farm. North Korea has placed increased emphasis on fish farming in recent years and they are cropping up all over the country. Many are run by the armed forces. But a survey of fish farms suggests that these pens are different, and not consistent with other sites in North Korea
Marine mammals can be trained to locate or pick up objects on the sea floor, such as mines or expended training torpedoes. The same skills can be used to inspect objects on the seabed, like cables and sonar arrays. If these are friendly, then it is useful for maintenance.

HI Sutton Image Used with Permission
Marine mammals can also be used to defend naval bases against saboteurs. They can also be trained to detect enemy divers and mark them for investigation and neutralization. Human swimmers cannot compete with dolphins or seals in speed, agility, and the natural ability to ‘see’ in dark or murky water. It’s not a contest, but because they cannot identify whether the diver is a friend or foe, they would only be used to mark the target by attaching a buoy. This is also more practical for training purposes. Enemy divers can then be dealt with by grenades or nets with shark hooks.
North Korea also trains dolphins for a dolphinarium in the capital, Pyongyang. Given the intertwined nature of its military and civilian apparatus, it is not farfetched to suggest that the naval program benefits from this experience and infrastructure.
 

northern watch

TB Fanatic
EXCLUSIVE: China's 'secretive, crash' nuclear buildup revealed



By Bill Gertz
The Washington Times
Thursday, November 12, 2020

China is rapidly building up its nuclear forces, including the expansion of plutonium and uranium plants as part of a secretive, crash program to add warheads to its growing missile and bomber forces, according to declassified U.S. briefing slides obtained by The Washington Times.

The four slides were part of a recent briefing for NATO allies in the past month on Chinese nuclear forces and show three facilities that appear to have sharply increased in size since 2010.

One plutonium production area, the Jiuquan Atomic Energy Complex, doubled in size at a nuclear reprocessing zone in the past two years alone and added another reactor in the past year.

U.S. officials view the significant construction at Jiuquan as part of what the Pentagon said recently is a plan by Beijing to double the size of its warhead stockpile in the next decade. China has more than 200 warheads and is building more for its growing force of multiwarhead missiles.

Intelligence from the briefing challenges widely reported studies on Chinese fissile material production. As recently as 2017, international experts concluded that China ended plutonium production for weapons in 1991 and uranium production for arms in 1987.

“The world deserves to know what China is up to. They have never admitted how many nuclear weapons they have and how many they plan on building,” said Marshall Billingslea, the State Department’s lead envoy for arms control.

“But it is clear from imagery that China is engaged in a secretive crash buildup of its infrastructure. There is no doubt that China wants to be on par with the United States and Russia in terms of its military and nuclear capabilities,” he added.

The academy has been compared to a combination of the U.S. Energy Department’s Los Alamos National Laboratory, where nuclear weapons were designed, and the Pantex plant in Texas that assembles the warheads that can deliver nuclear weapons to targets.

The CAEP has been described as a brain trust and the leading institution in China engaged in nuclear work, both military and civilian. It also conducts extensive financial transactions as part of its international business portfolio.

A third satellite photo made public reveals that China‘s military reactor complex at Leshan over the past decade grew by about 20 times the size of the original reactor in place in 2010.

Leshan, in southern Sichuan province, is the site used for making nuclear-weapons-related materials and naval nuclear reactors. In the past, a uranium enrichment plant was located in Leshan.

The Leshan complex appears to be part of China‘s major buildup of nuclear-powered ballistic missile and attack submarines.

An obligation to negotiate

Mr. Billingslea said Beijing has a legal obligation under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons to engage in arms talks.

“For months now, we have been calling on the Chinese Communist Party to come to the table and negotiate in good faith,” he said. “This is not merely an ask that we have. This is an obligation of theirs. China is legally bound to honor it. The NPT states plainly that all parties must pursue negotiations in good faith. China is perilously close to standing in violation of the NPT due to their repeated refusals to meet.”

Earlier, the Trump administration declassified new briefing slides on Chinese excavation at the Lop Nur nuclear testing site. Work at the facility recently increased, and the administration has suggested in official reports that China may have carried out nuclear tests there.

The briefing also included satellite photos of Chinese missiles paraded during the annual national day festivities.

A comparison of parades of missiles since 2009 showed that the latest parade in 2019 was 10 times longer than the first and displayed new missiles such as the DF-17 hypersonic missile, DF-26 intermediate-range ballistic missile, and DF-31 and DF-41 ICBMs, along with the JL-2 submarine-launched missile.

“In the past, I’ve said that in 2019 China launched 225 ballistic missiles. That is a huge number, more than the rest of the world combined,” said Mr. Billingslea, the arms envoy.

“The same was true in 2018,” he said. “As of October of this year, even with COVID-19, China has shot off 180 ballistic missiles.”

Adm. Charles Richard, commander of the Strategic Command, told reporters in September that China‘s nuclear buildup should not be measured by numbers of warheads, which are far fewer than the United States’ 1,550 deployed warheads.
Adm. Richard said a nation’s stockpile is a relatively crude measure of capabilities.

“You have to look at the totality of it: the delivery systems, what they’re capable of, what their readiness is,” he said. “And China, in particular, is developing a stack of capabilities that, to my mind, is increasingly inconsistent with a stated no-first-use policy.”

China has claimed its nuclear arsenal is far smaller than those of the U.S. and Russia and that it would not be the first to use nuclear arms in a conflict. That claim is under scrutiny because of the nuclear forces buildup.

“Given the huge gap between the nuclear arsenals of China and those of the U.S. and the Russian Federation, it is unfair, unreasonable and infeasible to expect China to join in any trilateral arms control negotiation,” Geng Shuang, China‘s deputy permanent representative to the United Nations, told the U.N. General Assembly last month. He called the U.S. demand to join the nuclear talks “a trick to shift the focus of the international community.”

China‘s submarine missile capability is also a concern.

China now has the capability to directly threaten our homeland from a ballistic missile submarine,” Adm. Richard said. “That’s a pretty watershed moment.”

The annual Pentagon report on the Chinese military stated that China‘s nuclear forces will “significantly evolve” in 10 years with advanced weapons and larger numbers of a land-, sea- and air-based delivery system.

“Over the next decade, China‘s nuclear warhead stockpile — currently estimated to be in the low-200s — is projected to at least double in size as China expands and modernizes its nuclear forces,” the report said.

It was the first time in decades that the Pentagon had revealed its estimate of warheads. Some experts say the number is much larger and includes hidden stockpiles of warheads.

A Chinese Embassy spokesman did not return an email request for comment.

 
Last edited:

jward

passin' thru
I am not sure why this post is on this thread, Are you suggesting that Trump will bring home troops from Asia as well as the ME?
No. I think that it's here because I was paying more attention to my first pot of coffee than which open tab was active.
..I will leave it though, so that your post has context. Sorry.
 

northern watch

TB Fanatic
No. I think that it's here because I was paying more attention to my first pot of coffee than which open tab was active.
..I will leave it though, so that your post has context. Sorry.

If Trump does withdraw troops from Asia, it will be a huge change, Japan, South Korea, Tiawan will immediate start building nukes
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
EXCLUSIVE: China's 'secretive, crash' nuclear buildup revealed



By Bill Gertz
The Washington Times
Thursday, November 12, 2020

China is rapidly building up its nuclear forces, including the expansion of plutonium and uranium plants as part of a secretive, crash program to add warheads to its growing missile and bomber forces, according to declassified U.S. briefing slides obtained by The Washington Times.

The four slides were part of a recent briefing for NATO allies in the past month on Chinese nuclear forces and show three facilities that appear to have sharply increased in size since 2010.

One plutonium production area, the Jiuquan Atomic Energy Complex, doubled in size at a nuclear reprocessing zone in the past two years alone and added another reactor in the past year.

U.S. officials view the significant construction at Jiuquan as part of what the Pentagon said recently is a plan by Beijing to double the size of its warhead stockpile in the next decade. China has more than 200 warheads and is building more for its growing force of multiwarhead missiles.

Intelligence from the briefing challenges widely reported studies on Chinese fissile material production. As recently as 2017, international experts concluded that China ended plutonium production for weapons in 1991 and uranium production for arms in 1987.

“The world deserves to know what China is up to. They have never admitted how many nuclear weapons they have and how many they plan on building,” said Marshall Billingslea, the State Department’s lead envoy for arms control.

“But it is clear from imagery that China is engaged in a secretive crash buildup of its infrastructure. There is no doubt that China wants to be on par with the United States and Russia in terms of its military and nuclear capabilities,” he added.

The academy has been compared to a combination of the U.S. Energy Department’s Los Alamos National Laboratory, where nuclear weapons were designed, and the Pantex plant in Texas that assembles the warheads that can deliver nuclear weapons to targets.

The CAEP has been described as a brain trust and the leading institution in China engaged in nuclear work, both military and civilian. It also conducts extensive financial transactions as part of its international business portfolio.

A third satellite photo made public reveals that China‘s military reactor complex at Leshan over the past decade grew by about 20 times the size of the original reactor in place in 2010.

Leshan, in southern Sichuan province, is the site used for making nuclear-weapons-related materials and naval nuclear reactors. In the past, a uranium enrichment plant was located in Leshan.

The Leshan complex appears to be part of China‘s major buildup of nuclear-powered ballistic missile and attack submarines.

An obligation to negotiate

Mr. Billingslea said Beijing has a legal obligation under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons to engage in arms talks.

“For months now, we have been calling on the Chinese Communist Party to come to the table and negotiate in good faith,” he said. “This is not merely an ask that we have. This is an obligation of theirs. China is legally bound to honor it. The NPT states plainly that all parties must pursue negotiations in good faith. China is perilously close to standing in violation of the NPT due to their repeated refusals to meet.”

Earlier, the Trump administration declassified new briefing slides on Chinese excavation at the Lop Nur nuclear testing site. Work at the facility recently increased, and the administration has suggested in official reports that China may have carried out nuclear tests there.

The briefing also included satellite photos of Chinese missiles paraded during the annual national day festivities.

A comparison of parades of missiles since 2009 showed that the latest parade in 2019 was 10 times longer than the first and displayed new missiles such as the DF-17 hypersonic missile, DF-26 intermediate-range ballistic missile, and DF-31 and DF-41 ICBMs, along with the JL-2 submarine-launched missile.

“In the past, I’ve said that in 2019 China launched 225 ballistic missiles. That is a huge number, more than the rest of the world combined,” said Mr. Billingslea, the arms envoy.

“The same was true in 2018,” he said. “As of October of this year, even with COVID-19, China has shot off 180 ballistic missiles.”

Adm. Charles Richard, commander of the Strategic Command, told reporters in September that China‘s nuclear buildup should not be measured by numbers of warheads, which are far fewer than the United States’ 1,550 deployed warheads.
Adm. Richard said a nation’s stockpile is a relatively crude measure of capabilities.

“You have to look at the totality of it: the delivery systems, what they’re capable of, what their readiness is,” he said. “And China, in particular, is developing a stack of capabilities that, to my mind, is increasingly inconsistent with a stated no-first-use policy.”

China has claimed its nuclear arsenal is far smaller than those of the U.S. and Russia and that it would not be the first to use nuclear arms in a conflict. That claim is under scrutiny because of the nuclear forces buildup.

“Given the huge gap between the nuclear arsenals of China and those of the U.S. and the Russian Federation, it is unfair, unreasonable and infeasible to expect China to join in any trilateral arms control negotiation,” Geng Shuang, China‘s deputy permanent representative to the United Nations, told the U.N. General Assembly last month. He called the U.S. demand to join the nuclear talks “a trick to shift the focus of the international community.”

China‘s submarine missile capability is also a concern.

China now has the capability to directly threaten our homeland from a ballistic missile submarine,” Adm. Richard said. “That’s a pretty watershed moment.”

The annual Pentagon report on the Chinese military stated that China‘s nuclear forces will “significantly evolve” in 10 years with advanced weapons and larger numbers of a land-, sea- and air-based delivery system.

“Over the next decade, China‘s nuclear warhead stockpile — currently estimated to be in the low-200s — is projected to at least double in size as China expands and modernizes its nuclear forces,” the report said.

It was the first time in decades that the Pentagon had revealed its estimate of warheads. Some experts say the number is much larger and includes hidden stockpiles of warheads.

A Chinese Embassy spokesman did not return an email request for comment.


Merde.....
 

jward

passin' thru
Indo-Pacific News
@IndoPac_Info

14m

#Chinese research vessels in #SriLankan waters come under #IndianNavy lens as they probably gather data for submarine operations Despite requests from Sri Lankan authorities, they don't disclose their activities within Sri Lanka’s Exclusive Economic Zone.
View: https://twitter.com/IndoPac_Info/status/1327541834491432962?s=20

“No details of equipment being carried are provided, nor the type of data being collected during deployment of these vessels,” the note said. “Research data is also not shared with Sri Lankan authorities despite being mandatory as per the agreement".
Sources in the know said the CCP appears to have bullied its way and swept aside all questions being raised regarding their activities in this domain. “It would be interesting to examine on how many occasions Sri Lankan authorities were permitted to embark these vessels?"
 

jward

passin' thru
Asia-Pacific Nations Set to Sign Massive Regional Trade Deal

The creation of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership will leave the U.S. sitting on the outside of Asia’s two major free trade blocs.


By Sebastian Strangio

November 12, 2020
Asia-Pacific Nations Set to Sign Massive Regional Trade Deal

Credit: Flickr/DFAT
The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) is set to be signed after eight years of “blood, sweat and tears,” conjuring into existence a free trade zone that will encompass a third of the global economy.

The RCEP mega-pact, which includes China but not the United States, was finalized in a virtual ministerial meeting on November 11 and will be signed on the final day of the 37th ASEAN Summit on November 15. The signatories to the trade deal – which unites the 10 nations of ASEAN plus Japan, China, South Korea, Australia, and New Zealand – have also left the door open for India, which withdrew from the RCEP negotiations earlier this year, due to concerns about the impact on local producers.

“All RCEP participating countries have concluded negotiations and will sign the RCEP agreement this Sunday,” Mohamed Azmin Ali, Malaysia’s international trade and industry minister, said in a statement following the ministerial meeting. “After eight years of negotiating with blood, sweat and tears, we have finally come to the moment where we will seal the RCEP Agreement.”

While some observers have questioned RCEP’s likely cohesiveness, its creation will leave the U.S. languishing outside the two major existing Asian trade agreements, even as it seeks to counter and neutralize China’s ambitions in Asia.

In January 2017, three days into his presidency, President Donald Trump withdrew the U.S. from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a 12-nation trade deal that was painstakingly shepherded across the line by the Obama administration. Kurt Campbell, who served as assistant secretary of state for East Asian and Pacific affairs under Obama, described the TPP as the “true sine qua non” of Obama’s “pivot to Asia” policy.

The 11 other TPP signatories have pushed forward with the pact, now known as the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP). While they would welcome the incoming Biden administration rejoining the deal, this is unlikely given the prevailing skepticism about free trade deals on all sides of U.S. political dial.

Although the U.S. retains a significant edge in military power, and remains a crucial economic partner to many Asian nations, the present administration has neglected the economic dimensions of its competition with China. As I’ve noted before, its tendency of picking small-bore trade disputes with regional partners has only undermined its broader goal of countering China’s influence in the region. Ankit Panda, a former editor at The Diplomat, wrote on Twitter that the imminent signing of RCEP was “a reminder that big things are happening – and will continue to happen – in Asia, with or without the United States.

While the strategic impact is unlikely to be felt immediately, the long-term ramifications could be profound. In the mid-twentieth century, the U.S. setting of international standards – on everything from trade rules and industrial standards to the angle of screw threads and shape of traffic signs – was a crucial and often underestimated pillar of American global power. But according to Evan Feigenbaum of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, the U.S. now sits outside the two agreements “that will set trade and investment standards in Asia for a generation.”

The RCEP deal is set to be signed on the final day of the 37th ASEAN Summit, which will run from November 12-15. The summit – and its surrounding galaxy of meetings, ASEAN+1 conclaves, and talk-shops – is being conducted via video link due to the ongoing pandemic. Also high on the crowded summit agenda will be recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic and the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Myanmar’s Rakhine State.

Asia-Pacific Nations Set to Sign Massive Regional Trade Deal
 
Top