CRIME The man accused of killing Charlie Kirk appears in court for 1st time [Tyler Robinson]

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen

The man accused of killing Charlie Kirk appears in court for 1st time

By The Associated Press and HANNAH SCHOENBAUM
Published: Dec. 11, 2025 at 5:04 PM CST

PROVO, Utah (AP) — The Utah man charged with killing Charlie Kirk made his first in-person court appearance Thursday as his attorneys pushed to further limit media access in the high-profile criminal case.

Prosecutors have charged Tyler Robinson with aggravated murder in the Sept. 10 shooting of the conservative activist on the Utah Valley University campus in Orem, just a few miles north of the Provo courthouse. They plan to seek the death penalty.

Robinson, 22, arrived amid heavy security, shackled at the waist, wrists and ankles and wearing a dress shirt, tie and slacks.

He smiled at his parents and brother sitting in the front row. His mother teared up after he walked in and clutched a tissue throughout the hearing while his father took notes. Robinson had previously appeared before the court via video or audio feed from jail.

Early in the proceedings, state District Court Judge Tony Graf briefly stopped a media livestream of the hearing and ordered the camera be moved after Robinson’s attorneys said the stream showed the defendant’s shackles in violation of a courtroom order.

Graf said he would terminate future broadcasts if there were further violations of the order issued in October, which bars media from showing images of Robinson in restraints or anywhere in the courtroom except sitting at the defense table.

“This court takes this very seriously,” Graf said. “While the court believes in openness and transparency, it needs to be balanced with the constitutional rights of all parties in this case.”

The warning comes as Graf has been weighing the public’s right to know details about the case against concerns by Robinson’s attorneys that the swarm of media attention could interfere with a fair trial.

Robinson’s legal team and the Utah County Sheriff’s Office have asked to ban cameras in the courtroom, but Graf has not yet ruled on the request.

Coalitions of national and local news organizations, including The Associated Press, are fighting to preserve media access in the case.

Graf held a closed hearing on Oct. 24 in which attorneys discussed Robinson’s courtroom attire and security protocols. Under a subsequent ruling by the judge, Robinson is allowed to wear street clothes during pretrial hearings but must be physically restrained due to security concerns. Graf also prohibited filming or photographing Robinson’s restraints after his attorneys argued widespread images of him shackled and in jail clothing could prejudice potential jurors.

Media attorney David Reymann urged Graf on Thursday to let the news organizations weigh in on any future requests for closed hearings or other limitations. He said media organizations want “limited party status” in the case.

Staci Visser, one of Robinson’s lawyers, pushed back: “We don’t want the chaos that is out in the media in this courtroom.”

Several college students who said they witnessed Kirk’s assassination attended Thursday’s hearing.

Zack Reese, a Utah Valley University student and “big Charlie Kirk fan,” said he had skepticism about Robinson’s arrest and was seeking answers. Reese has family in southwestern Utah, where the Robinsons are from, and said he believes they’re a good family.

Brigham Young University student William Brown, who said he was about 10 feet from Kirk when he was shot, said he felt overwhelmed seeing Robinson walk into the courtroom.

“I witnessed a huge event, and my brain is still trying to make sense of it,” Brown said. “I feel like being here helps it feel more real than surreal.”

Lawyers for the media wrote in recent filings that an open court “safeguards the integrity of the fact-finding process” while fostering public confidence in judicial proceedings. Criminal cases in the U.S. have long been open to the public, which the attorneys argued is proof that trials can be conducted fairly without restricting reporters.

Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk, has called for full transparency, saying, “We deserve to have cameras in there.” Her husband was an ally of President Donald Trump who worked to steer young voters toward conservatism.

Robinson’s legal team says pretrial publicity reaches as far as the White House, with Trump announcing soon after Robinson’s arrest, “With a high degree of certainty, we have him,” and “I hope he gets the death penalty.”

Defense attorney Kathy Nester has raised concerns that digitally altered versions of Robinson’s initial court photo have spread widely, creating misinformation. Some altered images show Robinson crying or having an outburst in court, which did not happen.

Robinson is due in court again in January. A preliminary hearing, where prosecutors will lay out their case against him, is tentatively scheduled for the week of May 18.
 

Kathy in FL

Administrator
_______________
This should not be taking so long to process through the system. It is making a mockery of justice. If they are hoping that it disappears from the minds of the public they are quite mistaken. This was a public assassination. It isn’t going away and making it easier on the defense … or on the prosecution for that matter.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
He is going to get off. IMHO, he is guilty. Of course, I'm not on the jury and I haven't seen the evidence but no matter what it is, there is NO WAY CHARLIE KIRK will ever get a fair trial to convict Tyler Robinson. Tyler can thank social media and all the podcasters amplifying every conspiracy theory anyone floats out there that they pick up and run with and magnify and spread to all their listeners who spread it around social media and the internet. They are basically giving his defense team the defense they need to sow 'reasonable doubt' - there are millions of people now who believe these theories, it just takes 1 out of 12 to stop a conviction in the courtroom. Play a few podcast episodes as part of the defense and the jury won't convict. Good job, give yourselves a pat on the back. I'm sure Charlie is so pleased with what you are doing/sarcasm.

Why do you think he was smirking and laughing with his defense team? hmmm.

HD
 

Starrkopf

Veteran Member
He is going to get off. IMHO, he is guilty. Of course, I'm not on the jury and I haven't seen the evidence but no matter what it is, there is NO WAY CHARLIE KIRK will ever get a fair trial to convict Tyler Robinson. Tyler can thank social media and all the podcasters amplifying every conspiracy theory anyone floats out there that they pick up and run with and magnify and spread to all their listeners who spread it around social media and the internet. They are basically giving his defense team the defense they need to sow 'reasonable doubt' - there are millions of people now who believe these theories, it just takes 1 out of 12 to stop a conviction in the courtroom. Play a few podcast episodes as part of the defense and the jury won't convict. Good job, give yourselves a pat on the back. I'm sure Charlie is so pleased with what you are doing/sarcasm.

Why do you think he was smirking and laughing with his defense team? hmmm.

HD
I totally disagree. No amount of internet conspiracy buzz is going to prevent him from going to trial and being convicted.
 

rafter

Since 1999
I agree he will go to trial. I never said he wouldn't. But he will not be convicted. I guess we'll have to wait and see... if it ever comes to trial. They are certainly dragging their heels.
He admitted to it to his trans lover. How is he going to get off?

I was surprised his parents were there. It would be hard for me to back a son that killed Charlie Kirk...especially with them being LDS
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
He admitted to it to his trans lover. How is he going to get off?

I was surprised his parents were there. It would be hard for me to back a son that killed Charlie Kirk...especially with them being LDS
I am sure that they'll think of something. "Deep State planted the post and it wasn't his"? I don't know, ask the podcasters who are saying his wife did it France, Israel and Egypt did it, etc; I don't listen to them but I'm sure they already have an excuse for that confession. They have thought of everything to get that guy off. interesting hmm... who do they work for? They certainly are using the death to split MAGA world and pull young supporters away from Trump, aren't they? And succeeding btw. (not accusing anyone of anything, just wondering about it; besides... all allegations & innunendos seem to be fair game in their world where conspiracy theorists can accuse anyone of anything with impunity).

HD
 

Krayola

Veteran Member
He is going to get off. IMHO, he is guilty. Of course, I'm not on the jury and I haven't seen the evidence but no matter what it is, there is NO WAY CHARLIE KIRK will ever get a fair trial to convict Tyler Robinson. Tyler can thank social media and all the podcasters amplifying every conspiracy theory anyone floats out there that they pick up and run with and magnify and spread to all their listeners who spread it around social media and the internet. They are basically giving his defense team the defense they need to sow 'reasonable doubt' - there are millions of people now who believe these theories, it just takes 1 out of 12 to stop a conviction in the courtroom. Play a few podcast episodes as part of the defense and the jury won't convict. Good job, give yourselves a pat on the back. I'm sure Charlie is so pleased with what you are doing/sarcasm.

Why do you think he was smirking and laughing with his defense team? hmmm.

HD
Sadly, I agree with you. A podcaster (don't remember who) was reporting on Charlie's public memorial service and was there when the crowds started arriving in the wee hours of the morning. The podcaster interviewed a lot of the people waiting in the crowd and most people he talked with did not believe that they had arrested the right guy. They thought someone else was behind it. Let that sink in. That was a group of people who loved Charlie so much they went to his memorial and even they thought it was a set up.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
Sadly, I agree with you. A podcaster (don't remember who) was reporting on Charlie's public memorial service and was there when the crowds started arriving in the wee hours of the morning. The podcaster interviewed a lot of the people waiting in the crowd and most people he talked with did not believe that they had arrested the right guy. They thought someone else was behind it. Let that sink in. That was a group of people who loved Charlie so much they went to his memorial and even they thought it was a set up.

It's horrific. I watched some of the Town Hall Erika did with Bari Weiss tonight and they were discussing this exact thing - their worry that he'll get off because of the social media conspiracy theories.

HD
 

Doc1

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Tyler Robinson has been jailed for many months and will be jailed for many more before his trial begins. If you recall, he apparently committed the murder for his boy-to-girl transgender lover. I haven't heard a peep about this person, but I seriously doubt that he/she has been a reclusive, celibate, wallflower, wailing away the afternoons.

Queers are notoriously promiscuous and he/she is no doubt getting lots of action while Robinson is in the clink. Unlike others here, I think he will be found guilty and I see it as a slam dunk case for the prosecution. He will no doubt at least get life in prison.

There he can spend years and decades pining away for his transgender love, while it's out there taking on all comers. In my book, Tyler Robinson and Karmelo Anthony are tied for the Biggest Idiot award of the decade. I do think that the prison experience is not going to be especially kind to either of them.

Best
Doc
 

Knoxville's Joker

Has No Life - Lives on TB
He is going to get off. IMHO, he is guilty. Of course, I'm not on the jury and I haven't seen the evidence but no matter what it is, there is NO WAY CHARLIE KIRK will ever get a fair trial to convict Tyler Robinson. Tyler can thank social media and all the podcasters amplifying every conspiracy theory anyone floats out there that they pick up and run with and magnify and spread to all their listeners who spread it around social media and the internet. They are basically giving his defense team the defense they need to sow 'reasonable doubt' - there are millions of people now who believe these theories, it just takes 1 out of 12 to stop a conviction in the courtroom. Play a few podcast episodes as part of the defense and the jury won't convict. Good job, give yourselves a pat on the back. I'm sure Charlie is so pleased with what you are doing/sarcasm.

Why do you think he was smirking and laughing with his defense team? hmmm.

HD
I think he was a patsy. I do not believe he did it, and if he did, he did not do it alone, without help...
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For the conspiracy theory we need to look at "who benefits" from this murder? Also in this day and age, "conspirators" need not meet in the physical world which takes kabuki to a whole other level.

Crazy lone gunman fits the circumstances as well as said individual being "inspired" online in some chat room. Where that turns into a conspiracy gets convoluted.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
The whole think stinks, like Trumps ear shot.........none of it adds up....
In horse opinion, the Charlie Kirk Assassination was likely CIA orchestrated. Some have opined that the direction of the bullet might match that fired by a hand-held camera/gun rather than a long distance "level shot." Many have said a bullet will do "crazy things" on entering a body, but in the Kirk case, the crazy is, well, VERY crazy.

The technology exists to create a hand-held "faux camera." It is possible to take event pictures and identify the 50 humans closest to Charlie at the time of his shooting - there has been NO reveal on that. But I'm certain it has been done.

As to who benefits by Charlie's death? ANYONE connected with the "Deep State" would no longer have a substantial competitor for office. Even silencing the "identification and attribution" that Charlie might assign, and make public knowledge of government affairs LESS publicly known is an advantage to the deep state.

Many have attributed a similar motivation for the attacks of a different kind on Alex Jones. Many have said that Alex "created" his own situation, but many leftists/new world supporters say that Charlie Kirk "did himself" too.

Dobbin
 

sy32478

Veteran Member
To this day, I am still shaken and heartsick. I am not naive, nor a shrinking flower. I can’t do a cui bono analysis. It is nauseating to me to try to imagine the mind which could possibly make such a cost benefit analysis.

The killer has to be mentally ill and the suspect seems to fit the bill.
 

Knoxville's Joker

Has No Life - Lives on TB
In horse opinion, the Charlie Kirk Assassination was likely CIA orchestrated. Some have opined that the direction of the bullet might match that fired by a hand-held camera/gun rather than a long distance "level shot." Many have said a bullet will do "crazy things" on entering a body, but in the Kirk case, the crazy is, well, VERY crazy.

The technology exists to create a hand-held "faux camera." It is possible to take event pictures and identify the 50 humans closest to Charlie at the time of his shooting - there has been NO reveal on that. But I'm certain it has been done.

As to who benefits by Charlie's death? ANYONE connected with the "Deep State" would no longer have a substantial competitor for office. Even silencing the "identification and attribution" that Charlie might assign, and make public knowledge of government affairs LESS publicly known is an advantage to the deep state.

Many have attributed a similar motivation for the attacks of a different kind on Alex Jones. Many have said that Alex "created" his own situation, but many leftists/new world supporters say that Charlie Kirk "did himself" too.

Dobbin
There was some speculation that his lapel mike was where the bullet came from and the tennessee explosives manufacturing plant explosion is where the material for the apparatus was made.
 

bracketquant

Has No Life - Lives on TB
I'm as close as I can be to total belief that he did not kill CK. Robinson may have been in the vicinity, but did not commit the crime. Others did, but whether their identity ever is announced to the public is doubtful.
What makes you believe that was the real Charlie Kirk? The fake Charlie Kirk was likely assassinated by the current fake Joe Biden. Right, according to your logic?

Sarc
 

vector7

Dot Collector

Sooth

Veteran Member
As I have gotten a bit older, my mental faculties have slowed somewhat so maybe I am missing something. That said, this guy that murdered Charlie Kirk admitted to doing that to his gay lover and his father, and the Sheriff, and his DNA is on the weapon used. Much more beyond that in evidence and I just have to ask. What the hell is the problem with getting this trial done and this psycho sent to death row???
 
Top