ALERT SOURCES: McConnell Caves to Pelosi, Schumer, Allows JCPA Media Cartel Bailout Bill to Be Included in Defense Package

Ogre

Veteran Member
Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell has caved to outgoing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and will allow the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) to include the highly controversial media cartel bill the Journalism Competition and Preservation Act (JCPA), sources familiar with the matter told Breitbart News.

Over objections from House GOP Leader Kevin McCarthy, the likely next Speaker of the House come Jan. 3 of next year, other congressional leaders acquiesced to lobbyist pressure and agreed to include the JCPA in the base text of the NDAA. McCarthy was the only member of Congressional leadership to fight back against the inclusion, but was overruled three to one after McConnell caved.

The JCPA has absolutely nothing to do with national defense, so the move—a swan song of sorts for Pelosi, who just announced she is leaving congressional leadership but retaining her House seat after Democrats lost the majority to the GOP in the midterm elections—is an egregious step for an outgoing leader of the past against precedent as the NDAA has generally been reserved just for national security matters.

Proponents of the JCPA have been struggling for over a year to move the controversial proposal through Congress, hitting roadblocks every step of the way in committee hearings and fierce opposition from Republicans like McCarthy and others including Jim Jordan, Steve Scalise, Marsha Blackburn, Tom Cotton, and more.

That’s why lobbyists supporting the bill on behalf of deep-pocketed industry interests zoned in on two must-pass legislative vehicles in this lame duck session of Congress as last ditch efforts to pass it before the GOP formally takes control of the House next year: the NDAA or a spending bill like an omnibus spending bill currently also being negotiated.

But because the NDAA is proving to be more of a lift than previously thought, the prospects of an omnibus spending bill to fund the government are dimming in recent days—leaders may instead pursue a continuing resolution (CR) to fund the government at the year’s end—which makes the NDAA a more attractive prospect for these leaders to attach unrelated proposals like this JCPA one to force them through in the waning hours of this congress into federal law.

The JCPA, essentially a transfer of wealth from Silicon Valley to the discredited and distrusted corporate legacy media, is highly controversial. Beyond the financial payouts to media companies, they will be able to form a “joint negotiating entity” — a cartel, immune from antitrust law — to negotiate with Big Tech companies on the “terms and conditions” for carrying their content.

Censorship is sure to be a frequent demand of media companies. Despite provisions in the bill that purportedly stop media companies from negotiating the suppression of any one competitor, there is nothing to stop them asking their content to be prioritized over broadly-drawn categories that are used as pretexts for censorship, like “disinformation.”

Breitbart News has closely covered how the bill continues to enable the censorship and sidelining of conservative media.

Via Breitbart News:

Even with the hastily-added Senate amendment aimed at addressing conservative concerns regarding collusion between the media industry and Big Tech on the censorship of competitors, the bill still contains plenty of ways for the cartel to sideline conservative media.
Provisions to ensure the cartel cannot discriminate on the basis of “viewpoint” are particularly unconvincing. The pretexts used by social media companies, “fact checkers,” and other arms of the corporate censorship apparatus are almost always viewpoint-neutral. No one is censored for being a conservative, say the censors: they are censored for “misinformation,” “hate speech,” “conspiracy theories,” and other purportedly viewpoint-neutral reasons.
Attaching unrelated provisions to any type of must-pass bill is a highly criticized practice, as it bypasses deliberation on the floor on the merits of the legislation, and adds controversy to what is normally uncontroversial among lawmakers — in this case, defense spending.

In using the NDAA to pass their bailout for media cronies, the Democrats have specifically undermined the bipartisanship of U.S. national defense.

Absent enormous backlash against the move in the Senate, Democrats and their frequent enabler, McConnell, will have been allowed to use a defense spending package to establish a government-approved gravy train from one set of wealthy, powerful corporations in Silicon Valley to another — the world’s largest and most powerful media companies.

The full text of the NDAA is expected to be released possibly as early as later on Monday.
 

Ogre

Veteran Member
Can someone who understands this explain in simply terms what this is going to mean?
Somebody else can probably give a better explanation, but "The way the JCPA is supposed to work is by giving an antitrust exemption to news sites, allowing them to negotiate as a bloc with sites like Google and Facebook, with the goal of getting paid every time those sites link to news articles. There are a few major, fundamental problems with that premise. For one, creating a new cartel to deal with existing monopolists is not competition, it’s the opposite. For another, creating an implicit right to control linking in any context won’t preserve journalism, it will let it rot away. Finally, the focus on getting paid for links makes even less sense when the problem, historically, has been the domination of the digital ad market by a few huge players."
It would make it easier for them to silence (for all practical purposes) all conservative news sites.
 

hiwall

Has No Life - Lives on TB
As is often the case, when most are positive that a bill will pass then they come out against it while knowing it will pass no matter what they say. They ARE all in on it.
 

Ractivist

Pride comes before the fall.....Pride month ended.
N DAA 2013 opened the door to propagandizing the media via gov outlets
What’s new
I'm guessing this was attached to the Defense bill as a 'rider.'

Each bill should stand on it's on merit. Riders should not be permitted at all.
all bills should be line item n vetoed without 66%
Screw the packages
They screw us using them
Purposely
Should be repealed
 

GeneSD

Retired December 31 2022
I'm from Kentucky, he is a democrat acting as a republican! RINOs only think about what is going to line their pockets with cash! They care not for the simple people who have not the resource to purchase their favors.
 

usmcpackrat

Veteran Member
Now that the 1st is dead, abandoned, bought and disposed of by foreign and domestic (sic) enemies, and relegated to the trash heaps of history, they will come full force for the second.

Pretty sure a dude named Alex tried to warn us during a showtrial.

Freedom of speech? Of the press? Of assembly? To petition for the redress of grievances?


Hahahahaha.....


Right.........as if .gov will tell the truth......

Rights? What was it Bush (shrub) said?

Something about "That Goddamned piece of paper"?


Should have been your 15th or 20th clue......if you were paying attention.....
Rights?......
You have none. Except what they feel like allowing you to have at the time.

Don't believe me?


Ask the families of the political prisoners of Jan6th.......
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
I have to wonder how this bill when enacted into law will fair in a post-hearings environment on the Deep State and those very same "media" entities and their collusion?.....Though it's easy to be a knee jerk cynic, considering we're in the "here be dragons" territory of the map who knows what may be in store next in either direction....
 
Last edited:
Top