View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtFwzbJ6rkk&feature=youtu.be
45 min run time I posted this elsewhere earlier, but it fits here. Solar nova catastrophe, what will happen, and how to survive it.
This is from Douglas Vogt, Diehold Foundation. He has some odd theories about Scriptures (other videos), but I am more interested in his information on the glass beads on the Moon, and NASA, and the real reason he believes we went there - to get evidence for periodic Solar novas (the heat of the blast causes vitrification). You can find glass beads on Earth too. Fission tracks in these are significant - not clear why, they seem to indicate excessive heat that only the Sun could provide, not any volcano. That is the general idea, as far as I can gather, anyway. This video talks about caves, and where you want to be on the globe, acc. to his forcasts - not much more than 15 degrees off the Equator, North and South. He thinks the initial heat of the nova will evaporate so much of the oceans on the sun facing side of the planet, that enormous amounts of clouds will form around the planet, and they once cooled, will snow and snow...and snow. He is predicting decades of snow for most of the planet. (Again, differences with Ben Davidson, and the above may be drawing from other of Voigt's videos).
Again, he also has some videos that I remember being better, that I watched about a year or two ago. I'll try to dig them up for posting. Vogt is LONG winded, and gets distracted. I wish he would cut these down to about a third of the length, but that is what it is. He is good at providing links, so the video is a good source for that in itself.
I am not a physicist. I am not a geologist either, and I do think Vogt IS weak in biology (per his thesis, there is just too much destruction for the biosphere to bounce back with all the previous flora and fauna found in the earlier stratigraphy. 12 thousand year cycles are too frequent for his idea of gamma induced speciation
- I see too much wrong with THAT to even know where to begin, at least in a short post. I am a Lamarkian, not a Darwinist). I strongly disagree with his idea about why the pyramids were built (for one thing, the Giza pyramids don't show the water erosion that is on the Spinx).
