POL Sol Wisenberg Explains Why Biden DOJ’s Probe Into Dem Rep’s ‘Astronomical’ Security Spending Is ‘Significant’

Kathy in FL

Administrator
_______________
Sol Wisenberg Explains Why Biden DOJ’s Probe Into Dem Rep’s ‘Astronomical’ Security Spending Is ‘Significant’

Former deputy independent counsel Sol Wisenberg said it was “significant” Tuesday that the Justice Department was probing Democratic Rep. Cori Bush’s security spending, as it typically has been “very political” against conservatives and Republicans.

The Justice Department reportedly launched a criminal probe into Bush’s spending on security, including thousands of dollars reportedly given to her husband. Bush has spent over $30,000 on her own security, according to congresswoman’s April Quarterly 2021 financial report.

Wisenberg noted the DOJ’s actions during the Biden administration made the probe into Bush noteworthy.

“The Department of Justice is not a right-wing organization and it’s been very political and it’s been very political going against conservatives and Republicans, so the fact that they are actively investigating, I think, is very significant,” Wisenberg told Fox News host Laura Ingraham.

WATCH: embedded video



Bush, who has called for defunding police, married security guard Cortney Merritts. Merritts has received over $60,000 in payments from Bush’s campaign for “security services” beginning in 2022, campaign finance records show.

“I would be very worried, and keep in mind, the 500,000 figure you mentioned, that is astronomical compared to the security figures that most Congresspeople spend,” Wisenberg said. “So, I would be very worried if I were her. There are three real issues. Number one, were they necessary, these expenses? Were they at fair market value? And, perhaps most importantly, how were they reported? All very pertinent questions.”

Ingraham later played a video of Merritts being questioned by a reporter about what he did in the campaign.

“Thinking things through becomes very important when you are under criminal investigation,” Wisenberg said. “And things that you say when you are confronted by the press in situations like this become very important. No, you can’t be charged for that, but they can be instrumental in proving intent. So he needs to be very careful.”
 

mistaken1

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Token investigation.

Repub investigations: 99
Dem investigations: 1

See? The DOJ is not politically biased and we have one investigation to prove it.


Like the dems care what anyone thinks, most likely Cori angered someone and now he is being investigated much like mayor adams when he went off script regarding the illegal invasion of the country.
 

BadMedicine

Would *I* Lie???
Nepotism has always been the enemy of merit.
However LOYALTY and TRUST are unmatched, or have the potential to be, from those you have KNOWN and RELIED ON for years. Nepotism is a way of reinforcing familial bonds, which strengthens the "genetic organism" that is your gene flow. Your Offspring is your highest gene flow, even though your SIBLINGS are 2x as many of your genes (100%) than your offspring(50%), and THEIR offspring, have as much of your genes as yours..... Anyone related has some.. and anyone from your ethnic group has some also...

nepotism is the microcosm of 'racism' but is not rooted in hate or dislike of others, but rather trust and rooting for 'Yours."

Only commies think nepotism is a bad idea... and no I don't mean in government, I mean in business.

Government should be merit based.... as should business, and capitalism INSISTS business stay merit based, however, within a margin of error, if one candidate is related and decades known and trusted, and another is of another ethnic group, religion and country... all things being equal, you pick the candidate that relates the closest to YOU & YOURS will have the least cultural or ethical/moral (Read:cultural) misunderstandings AND have more influence/ authority/ familial and communal "authority" over them if they are f*cking up.
 

Phelan

Contributing Member
However LOYALTY and TRUST are unmatched, or have the potential to be, from those you have KNOWN and RELIED ON for years.
You may have family that you trust and rely on, I have few that I do. I would never recommend that my family rely on a single source of income unless we can survive without it. Single point of failure for us all isn't wise in my mind. Loyal and trustworthy are also virtues, or MERIT if you will and it sounds like your family has already demonstrated these, good for you.
Only commies think nepotism is a bad idea... and no I don't mean in government, I mean in business.
Calling me names achieves what exactly? and do be specific how calling me a commie advances your position.

Why is it a bad idea to hire those BEST able to advance the goals of a business?

My current employer employees several members of her family to the detriment to the business. She accepts the responsibility of "family" and employs them regardless of the fact that they bring nothing to the company. Should she turn her back on "family" and not hire people ill-suited to the job she looses the family connection.
Government should be merit based.... as should business, and capitalism INSISTS business stay merit based, however, within a margin of error, IF one candidate is related and decades known and trusted, and another is of another ethnic group, religion and country... all things being equal, you pick the candidate that relates the closest to YOU & YOURS
Lots of qualifiers to that "IF" it almost sounds like family is the least likely to fill the needs.
will have the least cultural or ethical/moral (Read:cultural) misunderstandings AND have more influence/ authority/ familial and communal "authority" over them if they are f*cking up.
30 years ago this statement would have been correct. Now "family" is a claim on you and "family" has a higher authority to appeal to should they not like your authority, it's called the court.
 
Top