Hfcomms
EN66iq
RT 8 min
Really no synapsis as the title explains it. Pretty grim.
Actually, his numbers are accurate. Problem is, the majority of the population could care less about them... why is why so many are in DEEP debt.This guy has been walking and shrieking doom about the economy for years. Same kind of thing as IAllegedly and Jonathan Babe. He's clearly going for the "I'll be right someday" angle.

This guy has been walking and shrieking doom about the economy for years. Same kind of thing as IAllegedly and Jonathan Babe. He's clearly going for the "I'll be right someday" angle.
Can we PLEASE stop with that false narrative. I've shown, OVER and OVER, the purchasing power of the average Joe Six Pack has kept up with inflation, regarding wages. Why do you ALWAYS ignore the wage side of the equation?We are better off than the others but that doesn’t mean we aren’t inflating the dollar away.
Another poor example. People can easily open a High Yield savings account, and make between 3% and 4% on their money today, with zero effort. Or even move their savings to a CD paying the same.And to keep it even more simple also according to the FDIC the average interest rate paid on savings accounts is .39% APR while the government’s latest reported inflation rate (sic) is 2.4% so even leaving your savings in the bank your principal is inflating away.
Can we PLEASE stop with that false narrative. I've shown, OVER and OVER, the purchasing power of the average Joe Six Pack has kept up with inflation, regarding wages. Why do you ALWAYS ignore the wage side of the equation?
We have people right here who do the same thing.This guy has been walking and shrieking doom about the economy for years. Same kind of thing as IAllegedly and Jonathan Babe. He's clearly going for the "I'll be right someday" angle.

Every generation has challenges and each generation has to adjust to survive. There is a book about the Depression that is titled something like 'we had everything except money'. Worth reading. Instead of looking at all you do not have and cannot afford, look at how people in prior generations lived. You have a roof over your head and food on your table and you're ahead of probably half the world.
How many people today are willing to make major sacrifices in order to save for a home. How many are willing to buy an older home or do they need all the latest and greatest? How many are willing to buy a used vehicle and drive it until it won't go anymore? How many are willing to buy their clothing at thrift shops? How many are willing to have a minimal wardrobe, minimal household furnishings (purchased used), how many are willing to stop eating out, stop buying the latest and greatest cell phones, gaming consoles? How many are willing to tell their children that they can only participate in one extra circular activity and to say no to demands outside of their budget? Actually, how many even have a budget??

In 1970 a single wage earner (male) averaged about $9800 a year. A family of four on that wage could afford a mid sized home of about 1500 square feet (and nice car) and that home sold for between $22,000 and $24,000 or about 2.5x annual income.
In 2026 the median home price is $423,000 while the median income is $83,000 or 5.09x annual income…more than doubled. So with two wage earners working instead of one we are back to 2.5x annual income
I'm the same way. Payed off the house a few years ago, have a decent paying job that I work hard at, buy used vehicles, and mostly wear knock off 80/90's clothing. Granted I got a few luxuries, I don't go out of my way to keep up with the Jones'.
I think the best way I save money is by taking care of what I got, fix what I got and if I can't justify it, don't buy it.
Can't get over what people spend money on and what they deem is "essential".
I guess my standard is living is way lower than most. But who am I?![]()
Maybe it's the opposite. Maybe wages went up first, then businesses were forced to raise prices, so they could keep their doors open, due to the higher costs to the business.Guess, the big question is WHY do prices keep going up and thus income having to keep up? What is the root cause of this?
I've lived on BOTH sides of that situation. Had tough times and good times. Guess what, I prefer the good times, and did everything in my power to get there. And I'm a nobody, Joe Six Pack, so if I can get to that level, anyone can. But it takes work and effort, that MOST people don't want to do.Wages for most people simply are not keeping up except for the top 10% of wage earners and especially the top 1%. If you are in that group and by your demeanor while you have been here I take it you are, if you rubbed elbows with others outside your small circle you might be a tad surprised.
The problem is what job you're in. When DH and I got married, he made somewhere in the 20,000s-range, and we scraped by--that was during the first Trump administration--and now, he's make almost $35,000 more a year, and we're struggling more than we did before. The Biden administration wiped out our savings--thank God we had them--and we're working to become more self-sufficient. That requires money. There are more factors involved than just wages and inflation, but they certainly don't help.Can we PLEASE stop with that false narrative. I've shown, OVER and OVER, the purchasing power of the average Joe Six Pack has kept up with inflation, regarding wages. Why do you ALWAYS ignore the wage side of the equation?
Another poor example. People can easily open a High Yield savings account, and make between 3% and 4% on their money today, with zero effort. Or even move their savings to a CD paying the same.
I think the problem is what you're coming up with as far as minimum wage goes. The minimum wage in my state is still $7.25, the same it was before I became a stay at home mom almost 10 years ago. It hasn't gone up in that time, and eight-something is pretty common for the average low-wage jobs.I've lived on BOTH sides of that situation. Had tough times and good times. Guess what, I prefer the good times, and did everything in my power to get there. And I'm a nobody, Joe Six Pack, so if I can get to that level, anyone can. But it takes work and effort, that MOST people don't want to do.
And your wages narrative, you're making me post economic facts again, regarding wages, to show that narrative isn't true. This is what matters to the bulk of the population:
1974 in my area, a McD's cheeseburger was 35 cents and minimum wage was $1.75 an hour, so you could buy 5 cheeseburgers for a hour of wages.
2025, a cheeseburger is around $3.00 and minimum wage is $15.00 an hour, so 50 years later, you can still buy 5 cheeseburgers for the same hour of wages.
1974 Ground beef, $1 a pound, minimum wage $1.75 an hour, so 1.75 lbs for an hour of work.
2025 Ground beef, $6.90 a pound, minimum wage $15.00 an hour, so 2 lbs for an hour of work.
1974 gas was .39 cents a gallon, minimum wage $1.75 per hour, so 4.4 gallons for one hour of wages.
2025 gas was $3.00 a gallon, minimum wage $15.00 per hour, so 5 gallons for one hour of wages.
1974 White bread, .33 cents a loaf, minimum wage $1.75 per hour, so 5 loaves for a hour of work
2025 White bread, $2.00 a loaf, minimum wage $15.00 per hour, so 7 loaves for a hour of work.
1974 Dozen eggs, .66 cents a dozen, minimum wage $1.75, so 2.7 dozen for an hour of work.
2025 Dozen eggs $2.50 a dozen, minimum wage $15.00, so 6 dozen for an hour of work.
1974 Gallon of milk, $1.40 a gallon, minimum wage $1.75, so a little over a gallon for an hour of work.
2025 Gallon of milk, $4.00 a gallon, minimum wage $15.00, so 3.75 gallons for an hour of work.
But some will still say, "see the cheeseburger went from 35 cents to $3.00, so the dollar lost all that purchasing power". As shown above, it ignores the other side of the equation concerning wage growth. If people were still making 1974 wages, then they would have a point… but they’re not.
Because of Piss Poor Public Education.The real problem is that most Americans are financially illiterate.
I agree but schools have never taught about money management that I have ever heard about.Because of Piss Poor Public Education.

I took Consumer Mathematics as a Junior in high school (1987-88). We learned about savings and checking accounts, taxes, interest and loans.I agree but schools have never taught about money management that I have ever heard about.
I wish they would have taught me
Money makes the world go round is the old saying that has always been true for a hundred years. If money management is so very important why wasn't it ever taught to all high-schoolers?
I think a problem we are seeing both in the US and in Ireland (also the UK) is that people working a full time job, still can't make enough money just to pay the normal bills - rent/mortage, utilities (which today includes at least a basic internet subscription on either phone or a computer), food, basic medical expenses (children and adults can both fall down and break their arms) and over here "school fees" like uniforms or "voluntary" payments for things like computers.Money management has one simple rule ... you must spend less than your income. Doesn't matter what income level you're in, the rule is the same. Our high school seniors have a mandatory class teaching basics. It's been a long time since I had kids in school so don't recall details, but the class is still taught.
Money management is mostly common sense which is why so many people are in such desperate straits. A couple weeks ago I saw a shirt that said, "Let's make common sense common again." Common sense says if your budget says you can only spend $100 on groceries, you cannot buy steak.
Through the years I've seen some really awful examples of money management or in some cases money abuse. A friend's father would eat steak while his wife and dd ate hot dogs. He bought fancy hunting clothes and wife wore homemade cotton dresses and called my mom almost in tears so happy he'd purchased her a new pair of shoes. He bought a very expensive shotgun while she was using a wringer washer and had no dryer. A lady filing bankruptcy complaining she didn't have money to feed her children, but when I suggested cancelling cable and cell phone (when cell phones were new and not necessary) she flipped out. I could go on and on.
Today people want and demand instant gratification which buries them in debt.
What you don't take or consider in your above examples is the actual all in cost of the employer to keep the employee on the payroll.I've lived on BOTH sides of that situation. Had tough times and good times. Guess what, I prefer the good times, and did everything in my power to get there. And I'm a nobody, Joe Six Pack, so if I can get to that level, anyone can. But it takes work and effort, that MOST people don't want to do.
And your wages narrative, you're making me post economic facts again, regarding wages, to show that narrative isn't true. This is what matters to the bulk of the population:
1974 in my area, a McD's cheeseburger was 35 cents and minimum wage was $1.75 an hour, so you could buy 5 cheeseburgers for a hour of wages.
2025, a cheeseburger is around $3.00 and minimum wage is $15.00 an hour, so 50 years later, you can still buy 5 cheeseburgers for the same hour of wages.
1974 Ground beef, $1 a pound, minimum wage $1.75 an hour, so 1.75 lbs for an hour of work.
2025 Ground beef, $6.90 a pound, minimum wage $15.00 an hour, so 2 lbs for an hour of work.
1974 gas was .39 cents a gallon, minimum wage $1.75 per hour, so 4.4 gallons for one hour of wages.
2025 gas was $3.00 a gallon, minimum wage $15.00 per hour, so 5 gallons for one hour of wages.
1974 White bread, .33 cents a loaf, minimum wage $1.75 per hour, so 5 loaves for a hour of work
2025 White bread, $2.00 a loaf, minimum wage $15.00 per hour, so 7 loaves for a hour of work.
1974 Dozen eggs, .66 cents a dozen, minimum wage $1.75, so 2.7 dozen for an hour of work.
2025 Dozen eggs $2.50 a dozen, minimum wage $15.00, so 6 dozen for an hour of work.
1974 Gallon of milk, $1.40 a gallon, minimum wage $1.75, so a little over a gallon for an hour of work.
2025 Gallon of milk, $4.00 a gallon, minimum wage $15.00, so 3.75 gallons for an hour of work.
But some will still say, "see the cheeseburger went from 35 cents to $3.00, so the dollar lost all that purchasing power". As shown above, it ignores the other side of the equation concerning wage growth. If people were still making 1974 wages, then they would have a point… but they’re not.
What he doesn’t touch on/understand is that the fiat currency itself is dying. When you ‘save’ in rapidly depreciating dollars you’re really not going to be able to get ahead.
Which is why at this point, your best bet is to "invest" in something that will hold it's value better than the USD. Right now, the best bet would probably be food staples that last the longest on the shelf...
LOL... that has nothing to do with my comment and post above. I was responding to the comment about Purchasing Power narrative, that gets beat, on and on, and my example shows that the dollar STILL buys the same number of products, then and now.What you don't take or consider in your above examples is the actual all in cost of the employer to keep the employee on the payroll.
At least acknowledge that the overhead cost in labor(percentage wise) is twice at minimum today that is was even just 50 years ago.
That is a huge tax on the employees! And you don't take that into account. When I say tax, I mean less jobs and less pay!
Okay so you disagree that the purchasing power of a dollar for people's payrolls are the same as before. Because people's wages have gone up with inflation?LOL... that has nothing to do with my comment and post above. I was responding to the comment about Purchasing Power narrative, that gets beat, on and on, and my example shows that the dollar STILL buys the same number of products, then and now.
But, congratulations on getting your payroll tax rant inserted in EVERY thread you post in. At least, you're consistent.

I've lived on BOTH sides of that situation. Had tough times and good times. Guess what, I prefer the good times, and did everything in my power to get there. And I'm a nobody, Joe Six Pack, so if I can get to that level, anyone can. But it takes work and effort, that MOST people don't want to do.
And your wages narrative, you're making me post economic facts again, regarding wages, to show that narrative isn't true. This is what matters to the bulk of the population:
1974 in my area, a McD's cheeseburger was 35 cents and minimum wage was $1.75 an hour, so you could buy 5 cheeseburgers for a hour of wages.
2025, a cheeseburger is around $3.00 and minimum wage is $15.00 an hour, so 50 years later, you can still buy 5 cheeseburgers for the same hour of wages.
1974 Ground beef, $1 a pound, minimum wage $1.75 an hour, so 1.75 lbs for an hour of work.
2025 Ground beef, $6.90 a pound, minimum wage $15.00 an hour, so 2 lbs for an hour of work.
1974 gas was .39 cents a gallon, minimum wage $1.75 per hour, so 4.4 gallons for one hour of wages.
2025 gas was $3.00 a gallon, minimum wage $15.00 per hour, so 5 gallons for one hour of wages.
1974 White bread, .33 cents a loaf, minimum wage $1.75 per hour, so 5 loaves for a hour of work
2025 White bread, $2.00 a loaf, minimum wage $15.00 per hour, so 7 loaves for a hour of work.
1974 Dozen eggs, .66 cents a dozen, minimum wage $1.75, so 2.7 dozen for an hour of work.
2025 Dozen eggs $2.50 a dozen, minimum wage $15.00, so 6 dozen for an hour of work.
1974 Gallon of milk, $1.40 a gallon, minimum wage $1.75, so a little over a gallon for an hour of work.
2025 Gallon of milk, $4.00 a gallon, minimum wage $15.00, so 3.75 gallons for an hour of work.
But some will still say, "see the cheeseburger went from 35 cents to $3.00, so the dollar lost all that purchasing power". As shown above, it ignores the other side of the equation concerning wage growth. If people were still making 1974 wages, then they would have a point… but they’re not.
I'm going to disagree with the ease of bumping up your income being easy. Not everyone is as smart, talented, or blessed as many on this board are. Before I exited the workforce for health issues I had been out of work for over a year. The last job I held was a low paying job because I needed something, but I took a huge paycut. The job market in my area was saturated with too many bodies and not enough jobs and moving was not an option.I just listened to the whole video. Nothing new to me, I've known those stats for quite a while. Unfortunately, the far majority of the population will ignore those stats. Which is why like 74% of people live paycheck to paycheck.
But, the dude points out, more than anything else, people have a SPENDING issue more than a income issue. And in both of those situations, it's EASY to cut spending (if you want), it's also easy to bump up your income (if you want)...
But people need the WILL to do it, and for the majority of the population.... they DON'T.