INTL 'Russia's soul is monarchic': tsarist school wants to reverse 100 years of history

Melodi

Disaster Cat
My husband suggested that what keeps Putin from just declaring himself Czar (instead of just taking on the role) is that if he took the title he would have to deal with all the baggage that goes with it - from robes to nobility seeking favors; an appointed official council etc. This is an interesting look at a movement to get him or somene in the future to take it on anyway - either Putin or perhaps a member of the old royal family line? Guardian is now blocking photos so to see photos please read story at the link - https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/mar/06/russia-revolution-tsarist-school-moscow-nicholas-ii

'Russia's soul is monarchic': tsarist school wants to reverse 100 years of history

Patriotic financier known as the ‘Orthodox oligarch’ funds school that seeks to prepare students for the ‘inevitable’ return of monarchy
2880.jpg


Students dancing at the St Basil the Great School in Moscow.
Students dance at the St Basil the Great School in Moscow. Photograph: Andrey Kordelyanu/Shaun Walker/Guardian

Shares
928

Shaun Walker in Moscow

Monday 6 March 2017 13.58 GMT
Last modified on Monday 6 March 2017 15.45 GMT

“We are raising a new elite here,” said Zurab Chavchavadze, the dapper 74-year-old headteacher of St Basil the Great School, sitting beneath a large portrait of Russia’s last tsar, Nicholas II. “The students will be morally sound, religious, intellectual and patriotic, and will have every chance of getting into power.”

A collection of grand buildings set around a new cathedral in an upmarket suburb of Moscow, the school harks back to Russia’s tsarist traditions to inculcate a sense of patriotism in its 400 students.

As the centenary approaches of Russia’s 1917 revolution, which deposed the Romanov dynasty after centuries of rule, Chavchavadze is part of a small but influential section of Russians who are looking to the tsarist past for inspiration – and even hope to restore a monarchy one day soon.

“Look at what the Russian people did with Lenin, Stalin, Putin. As soon as someone is in power for a few years, they become sacred. The Russian people strive for a monarchy; the Russian soul is monarchic,” said Chavchavadze.

At St Basil the Great school, portraits of the tsars look out at pupils from the corridors. A statue of Catherine the Great dominates a hallway, and the student ballroom features vast portraits of eight tsars. The lessons include scripture studies and Latin, and the school’s history textbooks were specially commissioned, to avoid the positive view of much of the Soviet period given by the standard Russian textbooks.

The mission is to ensure that our graduates will be Orthodox patriots, carring the thousand-year traditions of Russia
Konstantin Malofeyev, founder


The school is the pet project of Konstantin Malofeyev, a mysterious Russian financier known as the “Orthodox oligarch”. Malofeyev, well-connected in the Kremlin, is believed to have funded rebel forces in East Ukraine, and has set up a nationalist, Orthodox Christian television channel, Tsargrad. The school, he said in an interview with the Guardian, is meant to function as “an Orthodox Eton”, which will prepare the new elite for a future Russian monarchy.

“The mission of our school is to ensure that our graduates will be Orthodox patriots who will carry the thousand-year traditions of Russia, not just those of the last 20 or 100 years,” said Malofeyev, from his central Moscow office, adorned with Orthodox icons and a large portrait of Tsar Alexander III, a 19th century ruler known for his conservatism. “For me it’s very important to restore the traditions that were broken off in 1917.”
4032.jpg


Headteacher Zurab Chavchavadze. Photograph: Shaun Walker/Guardian

After the February revolution – named for the month it began in Russia’s then-Juilan calendar – the country embarked on a short liberal experiment, but the provisional government was deposed by Vladimir Lenin’s Bolshevik uprising in October of the same year. Nicholas II and his family were executed in 1918; many aristocrats fought for the White armies in the Russian civil war, or fled to western Europe or further afield.

During the Soviet period, discussion of the Whites was forbidden. Chavchavadze’s family returned to the Soviet Union in 1947 in a wave of patriotism after victory in the second world war, but his father was quickly arrested as a spy and sent to the Gulag for 25 years, while the family was exiled to Kazakhstan.

In the post-Soviet period there has been renewed interest in the history of the pro-tsarist forces. Nicholas II has been canonised by the Russian Orthodox church. While Vladimir Putin’s administration has expressed admiration for the achievements of the Soviet Union, its foundation in 1917 is regarded as a tragedy, for the bloodshed and turmoil it caused.

Malofeyev, now 42, was born near Moscow to parents who lived in a special housing reservation for Soviet scientists. As a teenager during Mikhail Gorbachev’s perestroika, he devoured literature about the Whites, and swiftly became a monarchist.

“When I was 14, I read two books which had a huge impact on me,” he recalled. One was the memoirs of a former tsarist officer who went on to publish an émigré newspaper in Argentina, while the other was Lord of the Rings. “The image of Aragorn returning to Gondor was my second image of monarchy. It also affected my monarchism,” he said.

Taken with the idea of monarchy, Malofeyev wrote a letter to the Paris-based Grand Duke Vladimir Kirillovich, born in 1917 and considered the head of the imperial family after Nicholas II and his family were executed by the Bolsheviks and other royals died in exile.

After reading Malofeyev’s letter, the duke asked Chavchavadze, who was then working as his assistant, to deliver his reply in person. The pair have stayed in touch ever since.
Cossack troops on patrol in St Petersburg during the Russian Revolution.
3310.jpg

Cossack troops on patrol in St Petersburg during the Russian Revolution. Photograph: Slava Katamidze Collection/Getty Images

Malofeyev went on to study law at Moscow State University, writing his dissertation on the constitutional mechanism by which modern Russia could reintroduce monarchy, before going into banking and rapidly becoming one of Russia’s richest men. He tapped up Chavchavadze to head his school, which moved into its new premises in 2012. Its graduates, Malofeyev hopes, will provide the backbone of the “inevitable” future tsarist order in Russia.

Malofeyev said career politicians are venal and focused on electoral success, while monarchs can rule without the dirty business of politics intervening. He does not count Putin among the list of grubby democratic politicians, as the Russian president was handpicked by Boris Yeltsin.

“He never tried to get elected; he was found and put in place, and turned out to be sent by God. Who could have guessed in 1999 that Putin would come to us and Russia would start becoming Russia again? It was an act of God,” he said.

He claimed surveys show that the number of Russians who want a monarchy has risen from 15% to 25% over the past decade, and links this to Putin’s personal popularity.

Our liberals want to be like Europeans, but God made us different
Leonid Reshetnikov


Others who have gathered around Malofeyev’s tsarist agenda include Leonid Reshetnikov, formerly a general in the KGB and Russia’s SVR foreign intelligence and until recently head of an influential foreign policy think tank. Now he runs the Double-headed Eagle Society from a Moscow office adorned with portraits of Putin and Nicholas II.

Reshetnikov said he first became a monarchist when he was a KGB agent stationed in the Balkans during the 1980s, as he noticed there were no true believers in Communism. He is equally unimpressed with democracy.

“Our liberals want to be like Europeans, but God made us different,” said Reshetnikov. “Liberal democracy is like Marxism, it was brought to us from London, Paris and New York. We need to return to the point where we took the wrong turn, in 1917.”

Reshetnikov said it was likely to be decades before Russia could seriously think about restoring the monarchy, and would require a more mature and religious society before it could be contemplated.

Malofeyev, however, said it could happen sooner than expected, and said he believes it to be quite possible that Putin could be crowned tsar: “Nobody wanted Yeltsin to carry on forever, but everyone wants Putin to carry on forever.”

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/mar/06/russia-revolution-tsarist-school-moscow-nicholas-ii
 

willowlady

Veteran Member
Reshetnikov said it was likely to be decades before Russia could seriously think about restoring the monarchy, and would require a more mature and religious society before it could be contemplated.

Malofeyev, however, said it could happen sooner than expected, and said he believes it to be quite possible that Putin could be crowned tsar: “Nobody wanted Yeltsin to carry on forever, but everyone wants Putin to carry on forever.”

Very interesting. I wonder if these are "opening salvos" to restoring a Christian monarchy in Russia. It would sure put a flea in the ears of the Muslims they have over there. I also wonder if perhaps only a Christian monarchy would have the necessary, er, chutzpah to actively fight Islam.

It's pretty clear that even our form of democratic republic simply isn't working. Too much ingrained corruption. And that has existed since our founding (Look up the facts about The Whiskey Rebellion and who wound up being the largest whiskey producer afterwards). Only a benevolent monarchy might have the ability to nix the corruption and favoritism, and where do you find one of those? As soon as the benevolent monarch loses the ability to veto laws, it becomes a useless appendix to the body politic. Unfortunately, even a benevolent monarchy couldn't stop all corruption; it's built into human nature to take advantage of everything.
 

Melodi

Disaster Cat
My husband has also said many times he is not sure that Washington did the young nation any favors when he rejected the crown he was offered: if he had taken it it would have made the US the first modern constitutional monarchy and it would have prevented the problems that arise when Americans from the first two Presidential terms onward demanded that First Families (and First Ladies) act like Kings and Queens.

And while some Presidents and their wives come from political or at least elite social backgrounds (or even Hollywood) and so are able to negotiate a 24/7 stream of "what the first lady wore" or "the first daughter/son has a bad report card" all over the press or plan a State dinner while picking new drapes for the Lincoln bedroom others like Mrs. Carter (in recent times) married a US Navel Officer who became a peanut farmer; despite being First Lady of Georgia she obviously struggled very hard with her role as First Lady.

It has also resulted in a number of "quirks" that have gotten recent First Families into trouble; for example the need for at least the women in the American "royal" family to try and look like fashion plates but while some families (like the Trumps) are very wealthy and can afford this stuff, even Nancy Reagan had to "borrow" clothing from fashion houses. This is why you saw photos of Obama's daughters or even the Bush Twins and official engagements where a caption says something like "The House of Fashion Garbage salon du Paris wants everyone to know that this dress can be bought for 150,000 dollars" or whatever.

It also means that unlike the families of most Western Prime Ministers who are pretty much off limits unless they do something really spectacularly bad or spectacularly good; the family of the President has to live with the 24/7 limelight that European royal families RAISE their children to negotiate.

In the UK the Queen and the royal family (for example) get most of the "And the Queen today as dressed in a pale pink confection; standing next to the Duchess of Cambridge herself in a lovely shade of powder blue" barf gag type of endless gossip; I'm not sure people outside of the UK even realized their WAS a Mr. David Thatcher when Maggie was the Prime Minister.

But Washington did turn it down and was probably happy; I'm reading a book on the romantic lives of some of the founding fathers that also has a lot of history in it- by the end of his first term Washington hated the role and tried to avoid a second one; when he realized the young nation wasn't ready for him to step down he took a second one but had an even worse time (protests are nothing new in the US, nor is saying nasty things about The President).

The situation with Malania Trump is finally bringing out the insanity of an unpaid full time job that is expected of First Ladies who unlike the wives (or husbands) of most Prime Misters obviously isn't "supposed" to be in the back ground and certainly isn't "supposed" to continue her own job or agenda (just wait for the first, First Lady or Man who simply refuses to give up their medical practice or other non-conflicting career - in fact Mrs. Trump has already thrown down the gauntlet on this one; preferring to be a stay at home Mom while her son finishes school rather than "appoint a White House staff so no visitors can go to the White House?"

Why? Who in the name of heck designs a system for a public building (which the White House is, though it is also a private home) and makes visiting hours dependent on the non-elected, unpaid spouse of the President?...

I could go on but you get the idea; while I'm not sure these days that America really needs a King or even Russia needs a Tsar; I can say from my own experience doing Middle Age reenactment that there is something that drives human beings to respond in almost spiritual ways to words like "King" "Queen" or "Princess" and even "Chief" or "Prince."

People do like to view a leader as something above and apart from themselves; which is why America always still tries to turn each new Presidential family into temporary royalty...and will surely continue to do so unless or until such time there's someone with a title at least ceremonially sitting there instead.
 
Top