WAR RUSSIA INVADES UKRAINE - Consolidated Thread

Russian FAB Bombs Shatter Odessa; More Kiev Strikes Top Kiev Officials Killed; Russia Says NO Truce​

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ewc9EnTiowU

Run time - 1:25:21
Jul 26, 2026

00:00:00 Intro
00:00:35 Drone exhibition strike near Kiev
00:01:51 Casualty count keeps rising
00:02:32 Ukrainian intelligence officials killed
00:05:14 Ammunition depot strike comparison
00:07:56 New Kiev missile and drone strike
00:08:26 Drone factory and Palantir linked site hit
00:11:14 Geran drone family evolution
00:16:11 Theory on disrupted Ukrainian strike
00:19:04 Daily strikes pound Odessa
00:19:51 FAB bombs hit Odessa port
00:22:45 Bombing campaign escalation
00:25:25 Black Sea ships hunted
00:28:46 Tokayev's Kazakhstan intervention
00:32:16 Ceasefire proposal put to Putin
00:34:24 Russia rejects freeze, sets terms
00:46:38 Donbas front line collapsing
00:52:03 Kharkov crisis deepens
00:55:16 Zelensky's North Korea warnings
01:11:27 US pauses strikes on Iran
 
asiatimes.com

The real reasons behind Zelensky’s unpopular military purge​




Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky recently made the controversial decision to dismiss Mykhailo Fedorov, his minister of defense. Fedorov, admired both by Ukrainian troops and Western allies, was at the forefront of Ukraine’s increasing technological innovations in the war against Russia.

According to Fedorov, however, tension began to emerge over his own desire to replace General Oleksandr Syrskyi, the commander-in-chief of Ukraine’s armed forces. Widespread protests over Syrskyi’s role in the conflict subsequently led Zelensky to remove him as well. What this now means for Federov’s future is unclear.
Power struggles aren’t new to Ukrainian politics. Zelensky replaced the previous commander-in-chief, Gen. Valerii Zaluzhnyi. Similar to Fedorov, Zaluzhnyi was well-liked by Ukraine’s soldiers.
Zelensky’s removal of Fedorov and Syrskyi highlights an ongoing tension in Ukraine’s armed forces — one that Western pundits have misunderstood.

Specifically, western observers emphasize that Ukraine’s modern and technology-heavy approach in the war stands in contrast to Russia’s low-tech, industrialized approach.
However, Ukraine’s army is, in fact, a hybrid force that simultaneously needs the innovative approach championed in the West along with more brutal aspects needed in a war of attrition.
With such a hybrid approach, one factor of war becomes important beyond all others: morale.

Ukraine’s army​

When Ukraine gained independence in 1991, it inherited its armed forces from the Soviet Union, both in terms of equipment and personnel.
While Ukraine’s post-independence economic problems led to the degradation of its material assets, the country’s officer corps remained firmly entrenched in the old Soviet model.
Russia’s annexation of Crimea and de facto annexation of ports in the Donbas region of Ukraine forced Ukrainian leaders to re-evaluate their armed forces. Specifically, there was a push to acquire western trainers and expertise to overcome Russia’s military advantages.
The Ukrainian army’s transformation was still under way when Russia invaded in 2022. Critically, while much of the lower-ranked officer corps embraced western training, several senior officers, notably Syrskyi, preferred the older, more traditional Soviet approach.

The training provided by the West was critical in Ukraine’s initial successes in the war as lower-ranked and non-commissioned officers proved vital in blunting Russia’s offense. Zaluzhnyi — himself trained in the post-Ukrainian independence era — encouraged and supported these initiatives.
By 2023, the conflict began to shift from maneuver warfare, where Western tactics excel, to one of attrition, causing problems for Ukraine. Furthermore, the officers who made Ukraine’s tactics successful in 2022 were either promoted or killed in the conflict.
The ongoing war meant their replacements, although enthusiastic, could not be trained to the same standard.

War of attrition​

International media outlets and pundits have emphasized the importance of Ukraine’s drone technology in the war.
It’s beyond question that drones play an important role in the conflict. Zelensky and Ukraine have, in fact, leveraged Ukraine’s drone expertise to secure diplomatic wins resulting from the American war in the Persian Gulf.
What this assessment misses, however, is that drones cannot fully replace human beings in any conflict. Over-emphasizing drones also falls into the common Western, and specifically American, view of warfare — that technology is the decisive element in war.

This belief, needless to say, is reductionist and helped create the strategic imbroglio that the United States is currently encountering in the Persian Gulf.

Zelensky, however, isn’t falling into this trap. Yes, he emphasizes the role of drones because he knows doing so gets Ukraine attention in the global media. Furthermore, given that Ukraine faces a protracted recruitment problem, any use of drones helps alleviate the burden on the Ukrainian people.
Drones are also a cheap way for Ukraine to compensate for delays by western partners to provide artillery, air defence and other urgently needed supplies.
But Zelensky also knows that the conflict in Ukraine is now a war of attrition. In these kinds of wars, the ultimate winner is typically the state that maintains the will to fight the longest. In this goal, drones are a supplementary, not vital, component.

A matter of charisma​

Syrskyi lacks the charisma of his predecessor, Zaluzhnyi. Furthermore, his strategy has often been described as unimaginative.
But he did have an advantage over Zaluzhnyi and Fedorov that initially made him vital to the war effort: he had no illusions about its nature as a war of attrition and was willing to sacrifice Ukrainian lives for long-term strategic goals.
This pragmatic and brutal outlook suggests problems for Ukraine’s war effort. Syrskyi’s willingness to pay for strategic goals with Ukrainian lives made him less popular with the troops than his predecessor. This was ultimately what led to the protests against him that caused Zelensky to remove him.

Zelensky isn’t perfect. He has made several mistakes during the conflict and even before it began. That Ukrainians currently trust Fedorov to a greater extent than Zelensky after his dismissal raises the specter of a political rival in the future.
Zelensky does, however, recognize that war is ultimately a political act. There is a place for dissident opinions, but if they undermine the strategic goals of the political leadership, they become problematic.
For a while, Syrskyi’s brutal approach served Zelensky’s and Ukraine’s goal of winning a war of attrition. That’s why Zelensky initially chose to maintain him over Fedorov. Once the public’s disdain for Syrskyi became evident, however, Zelensky sacrificed him to maintain both his position and, more importantly, the support and morale of the Ukrainian people.

In a long war of attrition, after all, morale is of absolute importance.

James Horncastle is assistant professor and Edward and Emily McWhinney professor in international relations, Simon Fraser University
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
 

  • en



Next



  1. Home
  2. Europe

Romanian jet shoots down drone entering country's airspace for third day in a row​

Europe
A Romanian fighter jet on Sunday shot down the third drone flying into the country's airspace in as many days, the defence minister said. A government investigation reportedly identified the first of the three drones as a Shahed model used by Russia in its war with Ukraine.
Issued on: 26/07/2026 - 12:11Modified: 26/07/2026 - 15:50
2 minReading time
Share
By:
FRANCE 24
A file photo showing Romanian Air Force F-16 military fighter jets escorting a C-27J Spartan aircraft during a NATO Air Policing exercise above eastern Romania, on March 6, 2024
A file photo showing Romanian Air Force F-16 military fighter jets escorting a C-27J Spartan aircraft during a NATO Air Policing exercise above eastern Romania, on March 6, 2024. © Andreea Alexandru, AP

Romania on Sunday said it was summoning Russia's ambassador after the NATO member's military shot down the third drone in as many days in the country bordering Ukraine.

Romania has seen frequent drone incursions since Russia launched its 2022 invasion of Ukraine, but had not shot down any until Friday.

On Sunday, a Romanian F-16 fighter jet shot down a drone over the Black Sea, five minutes after it entered the country's airspace, Defence Minister Radu Miruta said on Facebook.

Romania is summoning Russia's ambassador following "repeated violations", following "repeated violations", foreign minister Oana Toiu said on X.

President Nicusor Dan quoted an investigation as saying a drone shot down on Friday was a "Shahed model, used by the Russian Federation in its war of aggression against Ukraine".

Investigations into drones shot down Saturday and Sunday were ongoing, he added.

"It is unacceptable and intolerable for the Russian Federation to continue violating Romania's airspace, which is also the airspace of NATO and the European Union," he said on X.

Martin L. O'Donnell, a senior NATO military spokesperson, also said the drone "appears to be of Russian origin".

He added the shootdowns come as Romania and other NATO countries "actively acquire ground-based interceptors" to beef up their air defence.

Moscow made no immediate public comment on the incidents.


Romania has reported dozens of drone incursions during the Ukraine war.

One smashed into an apartment building in Galati on the border with Ukraine in May, wounding two people.

A week later, a Ukrainian naval drone exploded in Romania's Black Sea port of Constanta without causing casualties.

Romania's army chief of staff on Friday said Russian attacks ⁠on the region around the Ukrainian port of Odesa had increased ahead of the harvest season, further pressuring crucial energy and trade routes in the Black Sea.


In 2025, the Romanian parliament adopted a law allowing for the shooting down of drones that breach its airspace.

(FRANCE 24 with AFP and Reuters)
 
Posted for fair use......

Zelenskyy Warns Russia to Mobilize 500,000, North Korea 30,000 Troops​

Ukrainian president cites intelligence on post-election mobilization, warns of untrained troops; UK shares electronic warfare tech

By WON Sunwoo
Published 2026.07.28. 04:28 Updated 2026.07.28. 09:29

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on July 27 (local time) that “Russia will issue a large-scale mobilization order of 30만∼500,000 people after the September general election” and “North Korea will also dispatch an additional 30,000 people.”

Zelenskyy made these remarks in an interview with Sky News UK before visiting the UK for his first summit with British Prime Minister Andy Burnham on the same day, stating, “Putin has no intention of stopping this war.”

He mentioned receiving intelligence agency reports that Russia is preparing a mobilization order for late September or early October, after the State Duma elections, adding, “He (Putin) is not publicly announcing the mobilization plans due to fear of public opinion.” Zelenskyy argued that Russia will not have enough time to properly train the newly mobilized troops and send them to the battlefield, claiming, “Many lives will be sacrificed.”

Zelenskyy, who recently claimed that Russia is trying to deploy an additional 30,000 troops from North Korea to the border regions, reiterated in today’s interview, “North Korea will send 30,000 soldiers to Russia,” adding, “This will be a problem not only for us or Asia but also for the United States and the West.” He continued, “Preparations to accommodate them (North Korean troops) in the Voronezh region of Russia have been underway since June,” adding, “North Korea is also preparing to send additional ballistic missile launchers to Russia.” The Russian Kremlin refused to comment, stating, “There is no need to make a special comment.”

Zelenskyy also claimed, “Not only North Korea but also Iran will send missiles to Russia, and China has also started cooperating with Russia, working on satellites and technology.”

Zelenskyy met with Burnham on the aircraft carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth in Portsmouth, southern England, on the same day. He is the first foreign leader to meet with Burnham since the latter assumed office on July 8.

· This article has been translated by Upstage Solar AI.
 
Posted for fair use......

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More


A Strategic Master Stroke for Putin: 30,000 North Koreans Instead of a Mass Mobilization at Home​


North Korea is rumored to be sending 30,000 more troops plus missile launchers, with Voronezh preparing to receive them since June, per Zelenskyy — a ‘win-win,’ one Seoul analyst argues: Putin gains manpower without a mobilization backlash, Pyongyang gets money and technology. A Ukrainian officer calls them ‘everything you need for a good infantryman.’

By Steve Balestrieri

Published
4 hours ago

The planned and controversial Russian mobilization planned by President Putin may not be as large as thought after all.

The North Korean military is rumored to be sending an additional 30,000 troops to bolster the flagging Russian forces in Ukraine.

The South China Morning Post wrote that in addition to the 30,000 troops, Pyongyang is also sending additional missile launchers to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

The SCMP quoted a focused political scientist and senior research fellow at the Korea Institute for National Unification, Oh Gyeong-seob, who stated, “This is quite a plausible claim.

“It would be a win-win deal for both countries,” he said.

North Korea Will Stand With Russia “Until Victory Is Achieved”


Russian President Vladimir Putin recently met with North Korean Foreign Minister Choe Son Hui in Moscow.

Choe pledged that Pyongyang “will stand by Moscow until victory is achieved in the Ukraine war”, and in return, Russia offered “full support” for North Korea’s national security.

General Secretary Kim Jong Un had called from the very beginning for North Korea to “consistently and resolutely support and assist the Russian army and the Russian people in their sacred war, without regard for anyone else,” she reportedly said.

North Korean Troops Suffered Terrible Losses In 2024


Under a mutual defense pact between the two countries, North Korea sent some 14,000 soldiers to fight alongside Russia in ‌Kursk. Those troops have suffered horrendous casualties.

An estimated 2,300 to 6,000 North Korean soldiers have been killed or wounded while fighting for Russia, primarily in the Kursk border region, according to various international intelligence and physical estimates.

A recent BBC investigation analyzing satellite imagery and official state media photos of Pyongyang’s newly constructed Memorial Museum of Combat Feats at Overseas Military Operations revealed approximately 2,304 names engraved onto the facility’s memorial walls.

A “Steady Stream Of Cheap Frontline Troops”


In his assessment, Oh stated that a steady stream of cheap frontline troops from North Korea offered Russia “a cost-effective way to recruit soldiers,” Oh said, “while Pyongyang receives money and military technology in return.”

Reports indicate that Russia has deployed North Korean troops to the Kursk region, where officials from Ukraine and South Korea state they have been used in high-risk frontal assaults and mine-clearing operations akin to “cannon fodder.

However, frontline accounts also highlight their high physical endurance and rigid indoctrination. “They are young, motivated, physically fit, brave, and good at using small arms.

They are also disciplined. They have everything you need for a good infantryman,” Lieutenant Colonel Yaroslav Chepurnyi, a spokesman of the Ukrainian army, said.

Zelenskyy Says Russia Is Preparing For 30,000 North Koreans


Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on Saturday that preparations had been underway in Russia’s Voronezh region to receive another 30,000 North Korean troops.

“We also see Russia’s cooperation with North Korea.

Russia wants to bring in another 30,000 North Korean troops,” Zelenskyy said in a video address. “Preparations have been under way in ‌Russia’s ⁠Voronezh region since June to receive them.”

Zelenskyy added that North Korea was preparing to supply Russia with new launchers for ballistic missiles.

“This is a threat not only to ⁠Ukraine. Russia is helping North Korea learn how to wage war, improve its weapons and gain real combat experience in using them,” he said.

“All of this poses a threat to every country in Asia that ⁠lies within range of North Korean missiles.”

Putin is, he wrote, “preparing the conditions for expanding mobilization.”

The Addition Of 30,000 More Troops Is a Major Escalation


Regardless of whether Putin goes through with his planned 300,000-500,000 troop mobilization, the influx of 30,000 more North Koreans to the battlefield, which is more than double the 14,000 troops already, carries severe military, geopolitical, and security implications.

This is a dramatic escalation of North Korea’s involvement in the war.

Tens of thousands of fresh foreign troops provide Moscow with the manpower needed to sustain large-scale ground offensives in occupied Ukrainian territories without triggering a domestic political backlash via a new mass mobilization.

By adding this many combat troops, which further internationalizes the war, it puts pressure on NATO and Western Europe to re-evaluate the limits of their support and intervention framework for the Ukrainians.

But this also has implications for the Korean peninsula.

There are reports that Russia has sent troops to North Korea to train the North Korean military on how to use combat drones and air-defense systems, but also to help set up in North Korea the production of Russian variants of the Iranian-developed Shahed/Geran attack drones.

U.S. Army Gen. Xavier Brunson said in an interview earlier this year that, given North Korea’s increasing involvement in the war in Ukraine, they are gaining valuable combat experience.

This has also changed the U.S. and allied threat calculus on the Korean Peninsula “in fundamental ways” as North Korea crafts a new playbook based on what it has learned during the Ukraine war, he said.

About the Author: Steve Balestrieri


Steve Balestrieri is a National Security Columnist. He served as a US Army Special Forces NCO and Warrant Officer. In addition to writing on defense, he covers the NFL for PatsFans.com and is a member of the Pro Football Writers of America (PFWA). His work was regularly featured in many military publications.
 
View: https://twitter.com/i/status/2081879979281858887


Explosions in Kiev: Russia begins new phase of operation to destroy enemy energy sector.

▪️By nightfall, Russian jet drones began raiding TPP-5 and other critical infrastructure facilities, according to enemy monitoring resources.
▪️During the nighttime raid, the drones operated near energy and heating facilities.
▪️Furthermore, a new direction of launch of jet drones was recorded – from Donetsk.
▪️This may indicate the beginning of a new phase of strikes against the energy sector – the Russian army is "testing" the most effective routes before more serious attacks closer to winter, according to Ukrainian analysts.
 
View: https://twitter.com/i/status/2081997865870831673


After over 840 days of intense fighting, one of the longest and most important battles of the war in Ukraine has come to an end.

Chasiv Yar has officially fallen to Russian forces, with the last Ukrainian holdouts withdrawing from the southwestern part of the city sometime in the last week. Battles for Chasiv Yar began on April 4, 2024, with a Russian mechanised assault with BMPs into the easternmost houses of the Kanal Microdistrict.

The city has been erased from the face of the earth, suffering destruction at a higher rate than even Bakhmut (where fighting lasted for just 8 months, in comparison).

This withdrawal took place due to the collapse of Ukrainian defences in Kostyantynivka, which made defending this salient untenable. The fall of Kostyantynivka would have allowed Russia to cut the Ukrainians off. Withdrawals from neighbouring Mykolaivka, Chervone, and Podilske will likely take place in the near future.
 
Well, another complicating factor.


Follow the Money Toward WWIII​


July 28, 2026 | Sundance | 104 Comments
It has been said that all wars are “bankers wars,” however, against the modern era of inverted fascism where corporations tell the govt what policies take priority, the more accurate truism ‘is all wars being controlled by money’, not necessarily banks.

The European Commission has constructed a very special kind of proactive financing for Ukraine that doesn’t require them to give their own €uros to the historically corrupt country. Partly because the EU doesn’t have their own money, and partly because everything the EU does in the sphere of finance is always a false construct, what the EU put together was a financial system based on sanctioned, confiscated (ie stolen) Russian sovereign wealth funds {citation}.

As part of the sanction regime, the EU and western NATO alliance seized roughly €250 billion, $300 billion USD, in Russian sovereign wealth assets. As long as the USA was financing the Ukraine government and war effort, those funds sat on the sidelines undiscussed. However, once the USA stopped writing checks to Ukraine an alternate finance system was needed.


What the EU (Ursula von der Leyen) put together was a finance package using the confiscated $300 billion in the Russian sovereign wealth fund as collateral for loans to Ukraine. The EU would send the money to Ukraine as a loan that did not have a payback mechanism. Instead, the thinking goes that when the negotiations for a ceasefire take place, Russia would be forced to give up the confiscated $300 billion as part of a reparations package to Ukraine.

Ukraine doesn’t have to pay back the loans because Russia will be forced to give up their sovereign wealth fund, and those funds will repay the loans. That’s the way the EU financing of Ukraine is set up. {SOURCE} The EU isn’t giving Ukraine EU money; the EU is giving Ukraine the Russian wealth fund money.

Now, immediately you can see a few problems.

♦ PROBLEM 1 – What happens if Russia demands the return of their $300 billion as one of their baseline terms for a peace deal? If the confiscated money is given back to Russia, the EU and Ukraine are on the hook for the $300 billion they would have spent.

♦ PROBLEM 2 – With #1 in mind, there is now an incentive to never reach a peace agreement or ceasefire; at least never reach a solution that would consider the return of the $300 billion. Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin has previously said the stolen money belongs to the Russian people and must be returned; he will never accept the theft.



Zero Sum Loggerheads
– If Vladimir Putin refuses to accept the theft, and the EU won’t return the stolen assets, it seems the only option left is to escalate the Ukraine conflict, with the EU aiming to defeat Russia. It doesn’t seem like a coincidence that this appears to be their current approach.

Yesterday in a stunning interview with Sky News, President Zelenskyy said a few remarkable things. One, he has plenty of money and two, Zelenskyy wants to build big, big factories in Great Britain in order to build missiles and drones away from the threat of Russian countermeasures.

The sick irony is that Zelenskyy would be building missiles and drones in the U.K to attack Russia using money confiscated by the EU/U.K and given to Ukraine. However, in this bizarre world that’s the reality of the thing.

When you overlay the pragmatic, transactional nature of President Trump into this dynamic, we can see how things look even more muddied over this confiscated Russian sovereign wealth. President Trump has often advocated for “taking the oil” or assets of a country to pay for the military expenditures incurred by the USA. Both in Afghanistan (theoretical) and in Venezuela (reality) this Trumpian approach is visible. To the victors go the spoils.

Russia is militarily holding approximately 20% of the land mass of Ukraine, the Donbas region, with no intention of ever returning it. Putin wants his sovereign wealth fund restored, and, if his doctrine is to be consistent, President Trump has no room to say Putin shouldn’t get it back.

The Europeans likely understand that President Trump is ideologically on the side of President Putin on this national economic aspect. The EU is against the return of sovereign Russian wealth. This part is a very interesting dynamic to watch.

Meanwhile, there are ancillary interests that exist within the economics of the conflict with direct stakes into the billions of euros. One of those interests is held by Ukraine’s richest person, a very corrupt billionaire Rinat Akhmetov, the owner of mining and steel firm Metinvest and the Ukraine power company DTEK.

Pay close attention. Billionaire Rinat Akhmetov (DTEK) has a lot on the line in the Russia -vs- Ukraine conflict.

[…] Akhmetov lost more than half of his assets as a result of the full-scale invasion, with many of his industrial holdings, such as the Azovstal steel plant in Mariupol, destroyed or damaged during the fighting. According to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, as of Oct. 31, Akhmetov’s net worth fell by 52% to $5.39 billion compared to the pre-war numbers.

Billionaire oligarch Rinat Akhmetov operated in that very lucrative space between Ukraine and Russia. Akhmetov’s assets are directly tied to both nations now in conflict. Akhmetov even has operational loans from Russian banks that have not been repaid due to the sanction’s regime, and if there ever was a resolution to the fighting, he would also be on the hook for repayment as well as the loss of his industrial assets in the Donbas.

[NOTE: Keep in mind, one of the primary issues that brought Putin to power was his opposition to the Russian oligarchs who surfaced as wealthy control agents following the collapse of the Soviet Union. The billionaire oligarchs controlled Russian politics until strong man Putin diminished them, smacked them in the nose and took back control.]

There is a lot of motivation for Rinat Akhmetov (DTEK Energy Co.) to support funding pro-Ukraine influence operations against Russia considering the billions at stake from direct energy company asset losses and reconstruction funds that he could also benefit from…



YAHOO NEWS – Ukraine’s richest man Rinat Akhmetov allegedly borrowed $400 million from Russia’s largest bank, Sberbank, the International Consortium of Investigate Journalists (ICIJ) said on Nov. 14, citing information obtained from leaked documents dubbed “Cyprus Confidential.”

The documents are part of a massive leak of millions of files obtained from Cypriot financial service providers.


The files also shed light on Akhmetov’s involvement in Russia’s coal industry after the annexation of Crimea in 2014. In 2016, Akhmetov’s energy company DTEK transferred ownership of a number of coal mines to a subsidiary of Fabcell Ltd., based in Cyprus. She bought these mines four years earlier in the southwest of Russia in the Rostov region. DTEK also transferred to the subsidiary a significant loan obligation in the amount of about USD 400 million from Sberbank (Russia’s largest state-owned bank).

In January 2017, Fabcell reclassified its shares into 7,999 common shares and one gold share. The gold share was assigned to Sberbank, which would allow the bank to gain control over Akhmetov’s company in case of non-fulfillment of its obligations.

[…] In response to the investigation, Akhmetov issued a statement to ICIJ saying that the loans provided by Sberbank and others before Russia’s illegal annexation of Crimea in 2014 were “standard practice for Ukrainian borrowers.”

Transferring the ownership of the Russian coal mines to the Cypriot subsidiary was a way of “limiting [DTEK’s] exposure to the claims of Sberbank as creditor and paved the way to exiting DTEK’s investment in the Rostov Coal Mines.”

In June 2022, Akhmetov filed a lawsuit at the European Court of Human Rights against Russia for gross violations of his property rights. Akhmetov asked for “billions of dollars” to compensate for the blockade, looting, destruction, and theft of his grain and metal from Ukraine to Russia. (read more)


With all of that said, we now have a solid baseline for how some financial interests in Ukraine are positioned.

All of the above information should help us to understand the dynamics and stakeholders.

 

Britain Backs Ukraine With New Electronic Warfare Cooperation​

by Tyler Durden
Wednesday, Jul 29, 2026 - 06:30 AM
Via RFE/RL,
  • Zelensky met newly appointed British Prime Minister Andy Burnham, who reaffirmed the U.K.'s military support and announced technology sharing for the Stone Cloak electronic warfare system.
  • Ukraine and Russia carried out long-range attacks that caused civilian casualties and damage to energy infrastructure on both sides.
  • Zelensky is continuing a major diplomatic push with a planned visit to Washington as Ukraine seeks additional military and political support.
President Volodymyr Zelensky met British Prime Minister Andy Burnham on July 27 as he kicked off a key week of talks with officials around the world to bolster Ukraine's defenses amid a rising civilian death toll from Russian air strikes back home.

Zelensky became the first foreign leader hosted by Burnham since he took office one week ago following the resignation of fellow Labour Party member Keir Starmer.

The two leaders met at the Portsmouth Naval Base on England's southern coast as Burnham pledged his country's "unwavering" support for Kyiv as the war with Russia runs well into its fifth year.

Zelensky said being the first foreign leader to meet Burnham was "an important signal of support."

"We discussed our defense – for Ukraine, it is important to have sufficient capabilities to protect lives both in the sky and at sea," Zelensky wrote on social media after the meeting, adding the development of joint defense production was also touched upon.

Burnham and Zelensky were later scheduled to meet some of the 200 Ukrainian military personnel who have been in Britain the past three weeks participating in a maritime security and counter-mine exercise in preparation for potential future Black Sea missions.

'Stone Cloak' System

Burnham announced the sharing of the intellectual property behind Britain’s new Stone Cloak electronic warfare system, enabling Ukraine to produce the technology itself.

The jammers, the size of a tablet computer, can be used to prevent Russian air defenses from tracking and targeting drones when attached to the projectiles, officials said.

Downing Street pointed out that the United Kingdom's support for Ukraine has reached 25 billion pounds ($33 billion) since Russia's full-scale invasion of February 2022, including 16 billion pounds ($21 billion) in direct military assistance.

Following the London visit, Zelensky is scheduled to travel to Washington on July 28 for talks with US President Donald Trump.

Zelensky is also expected to attend the funeral of US Senator Lindsey Graham, who died earlier this month. The Republican lawmaker was a vocal Ukraine supporter and had traveled to Kyiv for meetings with Zelensky days before his death.

Russia, Ukraine Exchange Deadly Strikes

Five people, including a child, were killed and eight injured in a Ukrainian drone attack on Russia's Rostov region, local officials reported on July 27.

Rostov Region Governor Yuri Slyusar said rescuers recovered bodies, two adults and one child, from the rubble of an apartment building hit by a drone, while emergency crews continue recovery operations and provide assistance to victims.

Zelensky, in a post on X, said that Ukraine's long-range strikes hit an export terminal in the Rostov region and oil facilities in the Yaroslavl and Udmurtia regions to reduce Russia's ability to finance the war.

"Last night, our long-range sanctions were effective in the Rostov region. An export terminal approximately 250 kilometers from the front line was hit. Deep strikes also targeted oil facilities in the Yaroslavl region and the Udmurt Republic, which is 1,300 kilometers from Ukraine's state border," Zelenskyy wrote.

Meanwhile, the death toll continued to rise in Ukraine, with the capital, Kyiv, coming under a Russian ballistic missile attack on July 26, authorities said, while other regions suffered air strikes during the day that led to at least six deaths.

In the northern Ukrainian city of Chernihiv, a Russian drone struck a supermarket, killing two people and wounding ‌25, Ukraine's emergency services said.

"This is deliberate Russian terror that has no military justification," Zelensky wrote on Telegram.

Regional Governor Ivan Fedorov said a glide bomb attack killed one person and wounded six in the southern Ukrainian city of Zaporizhzhya, which has been a frequent target of Russian bombardment.

In the frontline city of Slovyansk in Ukraine's Donetsk region, the Naftogaz oil and gas company said two of its employees were killed in a Russian attack while trying to help ‌residents affected by an earlier air strike.

One person was killed, and eight others were injured in a Russian strike on the town of Balakliya in Ukraine's Kharkiv region on July 27, regional authorities reported.

Russia denies targeting civilian areas despite widespread evidence of such attacks that have killed thousands of people since the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion.
 
View: https://twitter.com/i/status/2082392925342749054


RT: 0.23

What if this bit of Ukrainian propaganda is actually true?
Ukrainian soldiers experienced "cultural shock" during joint NATO exercises.

Following joint drills with NATO held in Sweden in 2025, the Ukrainian Armed Forces questioned the Alliance's readiness for modern warfare, according to Welt.

One Ukrainian soldier noted that Western armies wouldn't stand a chance on the battlefield.

According to sources cited by the publication, NATO troops constantly took coffee breaks to ensure they got enough downtime. Furthermore, Ukrainians were surprised by the sheer volume of peacetime regulations and strict rules—such as numerous restrictions regarding drone use on training grounds.

Under the exercise scenario, the Ukrainian forces played the opposing force against NATO units and ultimately dealt them a severe defeat, leaving the Alliance's troops looking "exhausted."
 
Air raid sirens in Lublin Poland is crazy.

2 Russian cruise missiles crossed 15-20KM over the border. No word on intercept or impact.
 
View: https://twitter.com/i/status/2082392925342749054


RT: 0.23

What if this bit of Ukrainian propaganda is actually true?
Ukrainian soldiers experienced "cultural shock" during joint NATO exercises.

Following joint drills with NATO held in Sweden in 2025, the Ukrainian Armed Forces questioned the Alliance's readiness for modern warfare, according to Welt.

One Ukrainian soldier noted that Western armies wouldn't stand a chance on the battlefield.

According to sources cited by the publication, NATO troops constantly took coffee breaks to ensure they got enough downtime. Furthermore, Ukrainians were surprised by the sheer volume of peacetime regulations and strict rules—such as numerous restrictions regarding drone use on training grounds.

Under the exercise scenario, the Ukrainian forces played the opposing force against NATO units and ultimately dealt them a severe defeat, leaving the Alliance's troops looking "exhausted."
Death and destruction are great teachers
 
From the Sky News breaking thread, it looks like a Russian Missile ended up in Romania...
Ukraine war latest: Russia launches widespread attack - as Poland scrambled jets in response
Russia has carried out a wave of deadly strikes on Ukraine, killing at least eight people, including three children. At the same time, Poland was forced to scramble jets following an airspace "violation". Follow the latest.

Thursday 30 July 2026 11:09, UK

LIVE
Russia
Ukraine


Video
0:46

Russia launches barrage of deadly strikes on Ukraine View post
In pictures: Kyiv and Lviv among the targets overnight View post
Poland scrambles fighter jet in response to airspace 'violation' View post
Zelenskyy warned 'massive attack' was coming yesterday evening View post
Live reporting by Kieren Williams
 
From RTE - the Irish National Broadcaster
Missile that left crater in Poland was probably Russian, Tusk says
Updated / Thursday, 30 Jul 2026 12:03


Crater at probable crash site of an object that entered Polish airspace overnight
A missile that fell in eastern Poland overnight was likely Russian, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk has said, after authorities found a crater and scattered debris in a field following reports of an explosion.


Poland scrambled fighter jets to secure its airspace after Russian airstrikes killed at least eight people in neighbouring Ukraine, including one in Kyiv, the capital, in attacks that extended as far as the western city of Lviv.

"All the indications are that it was a Russian Kh-101 ballistic missile, but we want to be 100% certain about the type of missile and who launched it," Mr Tusk told an emergency meeting.

"There was no direct threat because the missile landed in an uninhabited area; we were ready to shoot it down had it continued its flight," he added.

Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha had said earlier in a post on X that a Russian Kh-101 cruise missile crossed into Poland.

The Russian embassy in Warsaw did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment.

The operational command of Poland's armed forces said earlier on X that "An unidentified object moving westward was detected in Polish airspace," adding that it disappeared from radars soon after it was seen at 3.40am local time.

An Mi-24 helicopter that went to the object's last location to verify and confirm the radar data pinpointed the likely crash site, it added.

"A helicopter crew located the probable crash site of the object in an undeveloped area near the village of Tarnawa-Kolonia in Lublin province," it said.

The object left a crater about 10m wide, the interior ministry added on X.

According to local authorities, it was located in farmland about 2km from residential buildings.

Police in the Lublin region said they received a report of a loud bang in Bilgoraj county, between the villages of Tarnawa-Kolonia and Biskupice.

"Officers discovered a crater and scattered debris from an unidentified object in a field located about 2km from the nearest buildings, between the villages," the police added on X.

Sirens sounded in Lublin for a few minutes to warn against possible Russian strikes, media said.

Local residents outside a residential building partially destroyed as a result of Russian missile strikes in the western Ukrainian city of Lviv
Residents outside a residential building partially destroyed as a result of Russian missile strikes in Lviv
One of the dozens of missiles fired by Russia overnight struck a village house near the Ukrainian central city of Kryvyi Rig, local authorities said, killing three adults and three children from the same family.

"It was an ordinary home, blown into smithereens by a ballistic missile," Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said.

"Two more children were pulled out alive," he added.

The regional governor published photos of rescuers sifting through the rubble of a small house.

The attacks, which involved 74 missiles and 284 drones according to the air force, also resulted in casualties in the capital Kyiv, and in Poltava.

A Ukrainian firefighter works to extinguish a fire at a market following a Russian missile strike in Kyiv
A Ukrainian firefighter works to extinguish a fire at a market following a Russian missile strike in Kyiv
Russia's defence ministry said it had hit Ukrainian military-industrial complex, military communications and logistics centres.

Ukraine's air force said it managed to intercept 55 missiles and 265 drones launched by Moscow.

Mr Zelensky renewed his call for more supplies of air defence to protect Ukraine against Russia's ballistic missiles.

"Given the critical shortage of air defense missiles from our partners, our warriors are accomplishing truly incredible things," he said.

The Ukrainian leader on Tuesday had discussed anti-ballistic defence with US counterpart Donald Trump at the White House and discussed the possibility of Ukraine producing anti-ballistic Patriot interceptors.

Mr Zelensky said he had a "good meeting" with Mr Trump and said the US president "accepted that he will give us (Patriot) licenses".

Kyiv has throughout the war developed ways to defend itself against Russian drones and missiles, but super-fast ballistic missiles remain a challenge.

Of more than 120 ballistic missiles fired by Russia this month, Ukraine has downed less than a third of them, according to data from Kyiv's air force.

That compares to an interception rate for drones of around 90%.
 
View: https://twitter.com/i/status/2082621616400244784


Nobody should disrespect Trump like that.


LMAO! White House staffers are LITERALLY eating Zelensky’s lunch after President Trump kicked him out of the White House

“The lunch he was supposed to have was sitting right out in the hallway… and staffers will now be eating that lunch,” per Fox. RT: 0.53
while funy, that happened in 2025.

far more interesting, inckuding ignored comments, the last post on this thread was 2 days ago.

war must be over.

who won? no one cares
 
while funy, that happened in 2025.

far more interesting, inckuding ignored comments, the last post on this thread was 2 days ago.

war must be over.

who won? no one cares

Why Western Europe needs the Ukraine conflict to continue​

Drone warfare has altered the balance in Ukraine, weakened the spirit of Anchorage, and given Europe a new political case for the conflict
Published 31 Jul, 2026 10:50
Fyodor Lukyanov
By Fyodor Lukyanov, the editor-in-chief of Russia in Global Affairs, chairman of the Presidium of the Council on Foreign and Defense Policy, and research director of the Valdai International Discussion Club.
Russia in Global AffairsRGA on Telegram
Why Western Europe needs the Ukraine conflict to continue

© Toby Melville - WPA / Getty Images
The military-technical balance of power is a key element of every political system and changes in that balance, including those brought about by the emergence of new forms of warfare, shape political intentions and determine what is possible in international affairs. The rapid transformation of warfare, driven by the drone revolution and demonstrated over the past year in both Ukraine and the conflict around Iran, offers an opportunity to reassess familiar concepts and how they are evolving.
The spirit has changed, but let us leave the military aspects of drone warfare to the specialists and focus instead on the political consequences.
August 2025 can be seen as the turning point, when Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin held their much-discussed meeting in Alaska. Whether any concrete agreements were reached remains disputed, but what’s clear is the essence of what became known as the ‘spirit of Anchorage’.
Trump believed that although Ukraine was resisting stubbornly, its defeat was ultimately inevitable and the sooner Kiev accepted concessions, the less severe the damage would be. The understandings reportedly reached reflected what Russia was prepared to settle for, the withdrawal of Ukrainian forces from Donbass, and where meaningful political negotiations could begin. The White House then turned to the other interested party, the Ukraine-Western Europe partnership.
It’s difficult to judge how much pressure Trump actually placed on his European counterparts. Some effort appears to have been made, but neither Trump nor his advisers were prepared to invest significant political capital and that was especially true given that parts of his administration didn’t share his hostility towards Vladimir Zelensky.
Some of Europe’s worst Russophobes are tearing themselves apart – but it won’t help Russia
READ MORE
Some of Europe’s worst Russophobes are tearing themselves apart – but it won’t help Russia

The Western Europeans, for their part, played the situation skillfully. The post-Anchorage pilgrimage of leaders to the White House, mocked by many at the time, as they appeared to indulge Trump’s often boorish behavior, served its purpose. The objective of the EU and UK was simple: to slow down the process that appeared to have begun in Alaska and buy enough time to convince the American president that his assumptions were wrong. Ukraine, they insisted, was still capable of changing the course of the war.p
Almost a year later, it is fair to say that Brussels and London, together with Ukraine, achieved at least part of that objective.
Meanwhile, Western perceptions of the conflict have changed and at this summer’s G7 and NATO summits, the US president displayed a noticeably more neutral, at times even supportive, attitude towards Kiev. In effect, he acknowledged that his earlier confidence in Ukraine’s inevitable defeat had been, at the very least, premature.
Whether this shift reflects genuine changes on the battlefield or the success of an effective political and media campaign is open to debate, but either way, the change is real and the much-discussed ‘spirit of Anchorage’ has faded because the political climate itself has changed.

Fear and hatred in Europe

Ukraine’s growing ability to conduct long-range drone strikes is the product of three years of sustained financial and technological support from Western Europe, and despite Trump’s repeated claims that “Sleepy Joe” squandered hundreds of billions of American dollars on Ukraine, it’s European governments, Germany above all, that are now carrying the greatest burden of supporting Kiev’s war effort. That’s why assistance didn’t collapse after Trump returned to the White House and sharply reduced American aid.
To the last Ukrainian: Why the EU doesn’t want Kiev’s draft dodgers
READ MORE
To the last Ukrainian: Why the EU doesn’t want Kiev’s draft dodgers

Western Europe finds itself in a difficult position as it faces persistent economic problems alongside growing concerns about Ukraine and its own internal stability. Maintaining support for Kiev is politically sustainable only if it is presented not as solidarity with Ukraine, but as an investment in the half-continent’s own security.
Public rhetoric, particularly in Germany, increasingly suggests that a military confrontation with Russia around the turn of the next decade is a genuine possibility. The argument is straightforward: As long as Ukrainians are fighting, Western Europe has time to prepare and therefore the conflict should continue for as long as possible, although how much of this militaristic rhetoric reflects genuine belief remains open to debate.
The circumstances have undoubtedly revived Western Europe’s long-standing historical suspicion of Russia, a powerful and, from the their perspective, unpredictable giant to the east. During periods of close economic cooperation these fears receded into the background, replaced by the pursuit of mutual benefit, but this political crisis has quickly pushed commercial interests aside.
In that sense, today’s expectation of a future military confrontation isn’t entirely artificial as it reflects deeply rooted attitudes within Western Europe’s political consciousness.
There is, however, another dimension that is both more rational and perhaps not fully appreciated in that the EU and UK’s political establishment is searching for a new basis for internal cohesion at a time of profound economic and social change, and that faced with mounting uncertainty, it requires a unifying idea.
Nothing serves that purpose better than an external threat
 
while funy, that happened in 2025.

far more interesting, inckuding ignored comments, the last post on this thread was 2 days ago.

war must be over.

who won? no one cares
Albert stopped posting here. (Don't know why) Von C'ooler had a good run of pro- Ukraine stuff and X is full of dubious information including the recent post I thought was current. Sadly, it is difficult to get pure news to post. Military Summary Channel guy is on vacation. See a lot of neat stuff that is contaminated with biased assertions and additions.

It's a exciting time as Russia is picking up the pace and tempo and General Armageddon has returned from rehabilitation/retraining. Just wish there was a source for unbiased news coverage.
 
View: https://twitter.com/i/status/2083578926702481660


3hrs ago, Fox News/ verified account. RT: 0.20

Russia unleashes another massive overnight missile and drone attack on Kyiv, killing at least 10 people and injuring dozens more, Ukrainian officials say.

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy reportedly said Ukraine had just one Patriot interceptor missile left and warned the country has now run out of interceptors for its U.S.-supplied Patriot air defense systems.
 
Albert stopped posting here. (Don't know why)
Here, let me post something negative about the Oreshnik missile. That's usually enough to piss Abert off and provoke a response! It's not from the article posted below, but I very recently saw an article where some Russian spokestwat was giving a presentation on the Oreshnik, including yet more suggestions (without actually coming right out and saying so) that the submunitions were tungsten rods. I came away with the distinct impression that it was a very scripted dog and pony show, maybe trying to scare western Europeans without the expense of actually launching another Oreshnik missile. The screenshot below is something I spotted but didn't take notes on, saying something very different about the submunitions. The article below that supports some of my considerably less-than-gushing comments about the Oreshnik so far in this thread.

-----

Oreshnik submunitions cast iron (2026-06).jpg

-----

Putin’s Most Feared New Missile May Be Mostly a Bluff: Dozens of Warheads Rained Down on Ukraine — and Barely Left a Mark

Russia’s Oreshnik missile terrified the world when dozens of warheads rained down on Dnipro, sparking fears Moscow had launched an ICBM at Ukraine. But analysts say the strike may have carried inert payloads, British intelligence concluded Russia possesses very few of the missiles, and its real role is nuclear saber-rattling.

Caleb Larson
July 10, 2026
National Security Journal

Russia’s Oreshnik missile is one of the country’s newest — and has garnered a significant amount of attention thanks to the war in Ukraine, particularly following the missile’s use in 2024 against the Ukrainian city of Dnipro in November of that year.

But the Oreshnik is also widely misunderstood.

That initial Oreshnik strike generated a great deal of speculation that the Kremlin had, in fact, launched an intercontinental ballistic missile, or ICBM, against Ukraine.

But in reality, Western intelligence agencies and most analysts concluded that the weapon was actually an intermediate-range ballistic missile, or IRBM, derived from the RS-26 Rubezh, an earlier weapons program, rather than a brand-new, from-scratch design.


Weapons of War and of Politics

The timing of that 2024 strike was as relevant as the missile’s operational use. Just days before, Ukraine had begun using American-supplied ATACMS and British Storm Shadow missiles to strike targets within Russian proper.

Vladimir Putin presented the Oreshnik missile as a response to that battlefield development, stressing that Russia had in its possession a weapon capable of reaching targets throughout Europe while being beyond the interception capabilities of other countries.

That first Oreshnik strike landed on the Pivdenmash industrial complex in Dnipro, a formerly Soviet missile factory that supports Ukraine’s defense industry today.

But unlike previous Russian missile attacks, the Oreshnik strike caused only minimal damage. Ukrainian officials and independent reporting later suggested that the missile’s multiple reentry vehicles carried inert or modest explosive payloads rather than the missile’s anticipated full high-explosive warheads.

But the visuals of the Oreshnik strike were remarkable nonetheless: dozens of MIRVs racing to the ground created a potent psychological effect despite the much more modest destruction.


Oreshnik: How It Works

The Oreshnik missile appears to be a three-stage solid-fueled ballistic missile derived from the previously mentioned RS-26 parent missile.

Following launch, the missile accelerates beyond the atmosphere before releasing a MIRV bus, which carries six separate reentry vehicles.

During the 2024 Dnipro strike, each of those appeared to have released several smaller submunitions during descent, with potentially as many as 36 impact points resulting from a single Oreshnik missile.

From the standpoint of nuclear deterrence, Oreshnik’s MIRV bus and submunition capability are a distinct advantage. But from a conventional, non-nuclear standpoint, it is less compelling.


Operational Impact

Despite the bluster from Moscow, the Oreshnik has had a very modest, limited impact on the course of the war. Oreshnik has not replaced Russia’s Kh-101, Kalibr, Kinzhal, or Iskander missile families, which are all operationally much more common than the Oreshnik.

There is also not much evidence that Russia possesses large numbers of Oreshnik missiles, and following the Dnipro strike, British intelligence concluded that Russia had only very few Oreshnik missiles in its possession and that the missile had not entered serial production.

Arguably, Oreshnik’s most useful role was as a platform for Moscow’s nuclear saber-rattling. MIRV vehicles have historically been integrated into strategic nuclear missiles rather than conventional weapons.

As a consequence, Oreshnik’s use in Ukraine raised concerns about nuclear escalation in that war despite the missile’s conventional — potentially even inert — payload.

Ultimately, however, that didn’t fundamentally alter the conditions on the battlefield.


Deployment Abroad

While there has been some speculation about the missile’s deployment abroad, it is unclear if it is feasible. As noted by the Center for Strategic and International Studies, “In December 2025, Russia deployed Oreshnik missiles to eastern Belarus, likely at the Krichev-6 Aerodome, a former airbase five kilometers from the Russian-Belarusian border.

The site has a military-grade rail transfer point capable of receiving missile launchers by train.”

And while “President Lukashenko has claimed Belarus will host ten Oreshnik missiles… space constraints at Krichev-6 would likely require dispersing them across additional sites.”


Concluding Assessment

Oreshnik is perhaps best understood as a strategic signaling weapon rather than as a revolutionary weapon.

On a technical level, it demonstrated that Russia has revived and modernized some elements of the older RS-26 program and can field a missile capable of carrying multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles over intermediate ranges.

Its speed and MIRV bus make interception difficult, and in a nuclear role, it would present a serious threat.

But its first combat use showed some significant limitations too. The strike caused significantly less physical damage than many of the other conventional missile attacks that preceded it.

It is also likely too expensive to employ in regular, routine operations. Assessment suggests that its production is rather limited.

Overall, in its conventional use in Ukraine, the Oreshnik’s political and psychological effects have outweighed the missile’s operational contribution.

 
Last edited:
Here, let me post something negative about the Oreshnik missile. That's usually enough to piss Abert off and provoke a response! It's not from the article posted below, but I very recently saw an article where some Russian spokestwat was giving a presentation on the Oreshnik, including yet more suggestions (without actually coming right out and saying so) that the submunitions were tungsten rods. I came away with the distinct impression that it was a very scripted dog and pony show, maybe trying to scare western Europeans without the expense of actually launching another Oreshnik missile. The screenshot below is something I spotted but didn't take notes on, saying something very different about the submunitions. The article below that supports some of my considerably less-than-gushing comments about the Oreshnik so far in this thread.

-----

View attachment 614393

-----

Putin’s Most Feared New Missile May Be Mostly a Bluff: Dozens of Warheads Rained Down on Ukraine — and Barely Left a Mark

Russia’s Oreshnik missile terrified the world when dozens of warheads rained down on Dnipro, sparking fears Moscow had launched an ICBM at Ukraine. But analysts say the strike may have carried inert payloads, British intelligence concluded Russia possesses very few of the missiles, and its real role is nuclear saber-rattling.

Caleb Larson
July 10, 2026
National Security Journal

Russia’s Oreshnik missile is one of the country’s newest — and has garnered a significant amount of attention thanks to the war in Ukraine, particularly following the missile’s use in 2024 against the Ukrainian city of Dnipro in November of that year.

But the Oreshnik is also widely misunderstood.

That initial Oreshnik strike generated a great deal of speculation that the Kremlin had, in fact, launched an intercontinental ballistic missile, or ICBM, against Ukraine.

But in reality, Western intelligence agencies and most analysts concluded that the weapon was actually an intermediate-range ballistic missile, or IRBM, derived from the RS-26 Rubezh, an earlier weapons program, rather than a brand-new, from-scratch design.


Weapons of War and of Politics

The timing of that 2024 strike was as relevant as the missile’s operational use. Just days before, Ukraine had begun using American-supplied ATACMS and British Storm Shadow missiles to strike targets within Russian proper.

Vladimir Putin presented the Oreshnik missile as a response to that battlefield development, stressing that Russia had in its possession a weapon capable of reaching targets throughout Europe while being beyond the interception capabilities of other countries.

That first Oreshnik strike landed on the Pivdenmash industrial complex in Dnipro, a formerly Soviet missile factory that supports Ukraine’s defense industry today.

But unlike previous Russian missile attacks, the Oreshnik strike caused only minimal damage. Ukrainian officials and independent reporting later suggested that the missile’s multiple reentry vehicles carried inert or modest explosive payloads rather than the missile’s anticipated full high-explosive warheads.

But the visuals of the Oreshnik strike were remarkable nonetheless: dozens of MIRVs racing to the ground created a potent psychological effect despite the much more modest destruction.


Oreshnik: How It Works

The Oreshnik missile appears to be a three-stage solid-fueled ballistic missile derived from the previously mentioned RS-26 parent missile.

Following launch, the missile accelerates beyond the atmosphere before releasing a MIRV bus, which carries six separate reentry vehicles.

During the 2024 Dnipro strike, each of those appeared to have released several smaller submunitions during descent, with potentially as many as 36 impact points resulting from a single Oreshnik missile.

From the standpoint of nuclear deterrence, Oreshnik’s MIRV bus and submunition capability are a distinct advantage. But from a conventional, non-nuclear standpoint, it is less compelling.


Operational Impact

Despite the bluster from Moscow, the Oreshnik has had a very modest, limited impact on the course of the war. Oreshnik has not replaced Russia’s Kh-101, Kalibr, Kinzhal, or Iskander missile families, which are all operationally much more common than the Oreshnik.

There is also not much evidence that Russia possesses large numbers of Oreshnik missiles, and following the Dnipro strike, British intelligence concluded that Russia had only very few Oreshnik missiles in its possession and that the missile had not entered serial production.

Arguably, Oreshnik’s most useful role was as a platform for Moscow’s nuclear saber-rattling. MIRV vehicles have historically been integrated into strategic nuclear missiles rather than conventional weapons.

As a consequence, Oreshnik’s use in Ukraine raised concerns about nuclear escalation in that war despite the missile’s conventional — potentially even inert — payload.

Ultimately, however, that didn’t fundamentally alter the conditions on the battlefield.


Deployment Abroad

While there has been some speculation about the missile’s deployment abroad, it is unclear if it is feasible. As noted by the Center for Strategic and International Studies, “In December 2025, Russia deployed Oreshnik missiles to eastern Belarus, likely at the Krichev-6 Aerodome, a former airbase five kilometers from the Russian-Belarusian border.

The site has a military-grade rail transfer point capable of receiving missile launchers by train.”

And while “President Lukashenko has claimed Belarus will host ten Oreshnik missiles… space constraints at Krichev-6 would likely require dispersing them across additional sites.”


Concluding Assessment

Oreshnik is perhaps best understood as a strategic signaling weapon rather than as a revolutionary weapon.

On a technical level, it demonstrated that Russia has revived and modernized some elements of the older RS-26 program and can field a missile capable of carrying multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles over intermediate ranges.

Its speed and MIRV bus make interception difficult, and in a nuclear role, it would present a serious threat.

But its first combat use showed some significant limitations too. The strike caused significantly less physical damage than many of the other conventional missile attacks that preceded it.

It is also likely too expensive to employ in regular, routine operations. Assessment suggests that its production is rather limited.

Overall, in its conventional use in Ukraine, the Oreshnik’s political and psychological effects have outweighed the missile’s operational contribution.

Old . . . Not even news. From July 10
 

Zelensky says Ukraine has ‘no interceptors’ as ballistic missiles hit Kyiv​

KYIV — Russian ballistic missiles rained down on Kyiv early Saturday, killing at least nine people and injuring more than 30, as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said his country had run out of air defense interceptors.

Russian forces fired nearly 200 attack drones and 35 missiles, including 27 ballistic missiles, primarily at the capital, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky wrote on social media.

“Only one ballistic missile was intercepted, simply because there are no interceptors,” Zelensky wrote.

“A hell of a night,” Ukrainian Foreign Minster Andrii Sybiha wrote on X.
The Russian attack occurred hours after a major protest in support of Ukraine’s ousted defense minister, Mykhailo Fedorov, and tt followed another ballistic assault early Thursday that largely bombarded areas in western Ukraine, which are targeted much less frequently, and resulted in a Russian missile landing in Poland.

The Russian missile struck a rural area and did not cause any injuries. The incident raised fresh concerns about the risk of Russia coming into direct confrontation with NATO, more than four years after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
U.S.-manufactured Patriot air-defense systems are Ukraine’s only hope to counter Russian ballistic missile attacks, which the Kremlin has significantly increased in recent months. The system’s interceptor missiles are in drastic short supply, however, as the number, already limited, has been greatly depleted by the Iran war.Ask The Post AIDive deeper

Zelensky said it was “critical” that Ukraine’s partners, which Kyiv hopes will supply the needed missiles, “hear that these capabilities are needed not somewhere in stockpiles for hypothetical scenarios, but here and now, to contain and stop the Russian war in Ukraine.”
“Every night without them results in more casualties,” Zelensky wrote.
Zelensky urgently appealed to U.S. President Donald Trump during a White House meeting on Tuesday, offering in return Ukraine’s anti-drone technology, and extensive experience in destroying Russian and Iranian drones.
Trump earlier said the U.S. would give Ukraine licenses to produce Patriots, but on Friday he told the Financial Times he was “not sure” whether Washington would follow through. “We’re looking at it,” he said during a telephone interview.

Saturday’s strikes on Kyiv also damaged the Lithuanian Embassy, after a missile “exploded just steps away,” but no one was injured, Lithuanian President Gitanas Nauseda wrote on X.

Russia’s Defense Ministry said in a statement Saturday that Moscow “carried out a massive strike with land and sea-based precision weapons” on military enterprises and logistics centers, including facilities producing radio electronic components for Ukraine’s long-range attack drones.
Meanwhile, more than two weeks after Zelensky abruptly fired Fedorov, crowds continue to gather every evening in Ivan Franko Square in central Kyiv to loudly demand his reinstatement.
Friday evening witnessed the biggest demonstration so far. Protesters marched through Kyiv’s central streets to the square, which is just a few hundred yards from Zelensky’s offices that are perched on a hill above. About 6,000 demonstrators took part, local media reported.

As the crowd flowed down Kyiv’s main Khreshchatyk Street, they shouted “bring him back” and waved placards. One read: “Shoot at the enemy, and not [yourself] in the foot.”
The square is the same location where thousands protested almost exactly a year ago against Zelensky’s attempt to limit the powers of Ukraine’s main anti-corruption bodies — a decision that he reversed in the face of the public outcry.

These latest protests appear to be made up predominantly of those in their 20s and 30s — close in age to Fedorov, 35, the youngest defense minister in Ukraine’s history.
Ukrainians of all ages were dismayed by Fedorov’s ouster. An anti-corruption reformer and architect of the country’s highly effective drone program, he had developed a strong following despite serving only six months.

Fedorov said he was fired because of changes he had begun to introduce in the country’s military procurement system. Critics have said the system lacks transparency and is a possible source of corruption.

“The reason was related to procurements, to tenders, to the fact that we began to rebuild processes in this direction — this caused great dissatisfaction in many people who began to constantly influence and sow negativity not only around the president, but also in the entire media space,” Fedorov told the Ukrainian Truth news site on Wednesday.

The nightly demonstrations often have a carnivallike atmosphere, with protesters distributing handmade cardboard signs and handing out crepes with sweet fillings and other refreshments.
Yana Kotlynska, 21, an actor at the Ivan Franko Theatre on the edge of the square, said she had been at the protests nearly every evening. Fedorov was “a man who knows what he’s doing” and “can lead Ukraine to a good future,” she said.

“We have no right to lose this person like that,” Kotlynska said, as she and her colleague Diana Chorna, 22, handed out fresh waffles from a cardboard box.
The demonstrations have persisted despite the fact that Zelensky gave into one of the protesters’ main demands. Last week, he fired the commander of Ukraine’s armed forces, Gen. Oleksandr Syrsky, and replaced him with Mykhailo Drapatyi, who previously headed the Joint Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

Syrsky’s dismissal was a good start, removing a commander who was seen to be an obstacle to change, protesters said. But they vowed to continue demonstrations every evening until Fedorov returned as defense minister.
“I will keep protesting for as long as it takes — what has happened so far is not enough,” said Viktoriia Moskofidi, 26, the co-founder of a Kyiv art studio.
“Otherwise, it will only deepen the crisis,” she said. “We will simply waste more time dealing with this, instead of focusing on the war.”

 
Albert stopped posting here. (Don't know why) Von C'ooler had a good run of pro- Ukraine stuff and X is full of dubious information including the recent post I thought was current. Sadly, it is difficult to get pure news to post. Military Summary Channel guy is on vacation. See a lot of neat stuff that is contaminated with biased assertions and additions.

It's a exciting time as Russia is picking up the pace and tempo and General Armageddon has returned from rehabilitation/retraining. Just wish there was a source for unbiased news coverage.

I tried to find Albert's member profile but it's no longer showing up. I don't know why?
 
Facebook post from Arlette O’Rourke:
(Long but worth the read- dot connecting)
THE SUNDAY REPORT: WORLD WAR THREE MATERIALIZED

July 26, 2026

It is difficult to deny the shape and structure beginning to form beneath our noses. World War Three is here, and we are in for a long ride. Peace talks won’t be getting us out of these moves anytime soon. The world is preparing its allies, and the lines in the sand are becoming harder to ignore.

This week, the Houthis attacked Saudi Aramco facilities in Jizan and Yanbu. Ukraine struck an Iranian vessel in the Caspian Sea. Russia began preparing for the possible arrival of another 30,000 North Korean troops. Chinese forces injured a Philippine sailor while the United States, Japan and the Philippines conducted joint exercises in the same contested waters. China also held live fire drills in the Taiwan Strait and near waters claimed by Japan.

Europe, the Middle East and Asia are now connected through troops, weapons, intelligence, energy infrastructure and military supply lines. The countries involved are openly preparing for a conflict that reaches well beyond any one border.

The Houthi attack on Saudi Arabia is one of the most serious developments of the week.

Houthi forces launched missiles and drones at Saudi Aramco sites in Jizan and Yanbu. Reuters verified video showing a large column of smoke rising from the direction of the Jizan refinery. Trading sources reported possible damage to fuel and oil storage facilities. Two missiles aimed at oil installations near Yanbu were intercepted. Saudi backed forces retaliated with strikes inside Yemen, and forces on both sides of Yemen’s civil war began mobilizing again.

Yanbu is Saudi Arabia’s main Red Sea oil port. It has become increasingly important because Saudi Arabia’s East West Pipeline carries crude across the country from the eastern oil fields to the Red Sea, allowing it to bypass the Strait of Hormuz.

The pipeline system reaches approximately 7 million barrels per day of capacity. The entire route depends on pumping stations, storage tanks, refineries, terminals and tanker access at the Red Sea end.

The Houthis are attacking the infrastructure Saudi Arabia needs to move oil around Hormuz. They have also declared a blockade against Saudi oil shipments and attacked Saudi tankers in the Red Sea.

Oil reached $100.69 per barrel on Thursday after the tanker attacks and threats against Red Sea traffic. Brent rose 7 percent in one day and finished nearly 40 percent above where it began the month. The Aramco attacks occurred after Friday’s market close, meaning the market had not yet fully priced the threat to Jizan and Yanbu.

The pressure is now building around the Strait of Hormuz, the Bab el Mandeb Strait and the pipeline system connecting Saudi Arabia’s eastern oil fields to its western coast. Damage anywhere along that chain can slow exports and raise the cost of moving what oil remains available.

Oil touches everything. It runs farm equipment, trucks, cargo ships, aircraft, construction equipment and much of the machinery used to produce and distribute food. Higher oil prices move quickly into transportation, fertilizer, manufacturing and consumer prices. A prolonged disruption will reach people who have never looked at an oil chart in their lives.

The conflict also reached the Caspian Sea this week.

Iran says Ukraine attacked an Iranian commercial vessel, causing an explosion that killed one sailor and injured another. Tehran summoned Ukraine’s diplomatic representative and accused Kyiv of deliberately expanding the war.

President Volodymyr Zelensky said Ukraine had attacked a Russian warship and vessels used to transport military cargo connected to Iran. He also accused Russia of sharing satellite observations of American and Gulf military installations with Iran, including sites in Bahrain, Jordan and Kuwait.

Iran has supplied Russia with weapons and military technology throughout the war in Ukraine. Ukraine is now targeting vessels operating within the network connecting Russia and Iran. Russia stands accused of supplying Iran with intelligence about American and allied positions in the Middle East.

The Ukraine war has reached an Iranian vessel in the Caspian. The Iran war is drawing in Russian surveillance and military support. The separation between these conflicts is disappearing.

North Korea is also moving deeper into Russia’s war.

Zelensky says Russia is preparing to receive another 30,000 North Korean soldiers and that preparations have been underway in Russia’s Voronezh region since June. North Korea previously sent an estimated 14,000 troops to Russia’s Kursk region under the defense agreement between Moscow and Pyongyang. North Korea is also preparing to supply additional ballistic missile launchers.

Thirty thousand additional soldiers would create a large North Korean military presence inside Europe. Russia would receive badly needed manpower. North Korea would gain battlefield experience against Western weapons, drones, surveillance systems and communications technology.

Those soldiers will carry that experience home. North Korea will also expect military technology, economic support and security guarantees from Russia in return.

The relationship between Russia and North Korea has already moved beyond weapons sales and political support. North Korean troops are fighting beside Russian troops. Iran is supplying Russia. Russia is supporting Iran. Ukraine is attacking the network connecting them.

China is drawing its own lines.

The Philippines says Chinese Coast Guard personnel struck a Philippine sailor in the head with a wooden baton during a confrontation near Second Thomas Shoal. Chinese vessels then used water cannons against Philippine government ships near Scarborough Shoal on two consecutive days. Both countries summoned the other’s ambassador.

At the same time, the United States and Japan joined the Philippines in five days of maritime exercises involving warships, coast guard vessels, fighter aircraft and surveillance aircraft. China responded with naval and air patrols in the South China Sea.

China also began two days of live fire drills in the Taiwan Strait following talks between American and Chinese officials. Taiwan condemned the exercises and accused Beijing of using military force to increase pressure around the island.

Japan protested after a Chinese destroyer conducted live fire exercises in waters Japan considers part of its exclusive economic zone. China rejected Japan’s claim over those waters.

The Philippines and Japan are both treaty allies of the United States. Taiwan remains one of the most dangerous points of confrontation between Washington and Beijing. Warships and aircraft are operating closer together, more often and with live weapons.

A sailor has already been injured. Ships are using water cannons and striking one another at close range. Live ammunition is being fired in contested waters. Every encounter creates another opportunity for a death, a collision or a decision that forces governments to respond.

Peace negotiations on one front will not unwind this.

The troops will still be deployed. The weapons factories will continue operating. The intelligence relationships will remain. The supply routes and military agreements will continue. Countries are preparing for conflicts that could last years, regardless of what is said at a negotiating table.

Americans need to understand how much the battlefield has changed.

Pipelines, refineries, electrical substations, ports, communications systems, satellites, water facilities, transportation networks and financial systems are all vital infrastructure. Damaging them can weaken a country without sending an army across its border.

Federal agencies updated a warning this week about Iranian affiliated cyber actors targeting internet connected operational technology in the United States. The targets include programmable logic controllers used to operate pumps, valves and industrial equipment. The FBI says the actors intended to cause disruptions.

These systems operate real machinery. A cyberattack can stop a water pump, interfere with treatment equipment, change pressure inside a pipeline, disable an alarm or shut down part of an industrial facility.

Physical attacks are also possible. Drones, sabotage and coordinated attacks against substations, pipelines or communications infrastructure could cause extensive disruption without destroying the entire national system.

An electromagnetic pulse also belongs within the range of threats people need to understand. The Department of Energy works with the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Defense and national laboratories to address high altitude EMP risks to the electrical grid and other connected infrastructure.

We have reached a moment when attacks on American soil and attacks against the systems serving American communities must be taken seriously. No one can tell us what form the next escalation will take. It could involve cyber operations, sabotage, drones, military facilities, pipelines, communications, satellites, the electrical grid or an electromagnetic weapon.

Electricity operates water pumps, fuel terminals, refrigeration, cellular networks, banking systems and much of the transportation system. A serious disruption in one sector immediately places pressure on the others.

This does not require people to live in fear. It requires people to stop assuming that everything will continue operating normally regardless of what happens in the rest of the world.

The condition of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve is another issue people need to understand.

The reserve fell by another 5.1 million barrels during the week ending July 17, leaving 311.4 million barrels. That is the lowest level since March 1983. More than 104 million barrels have been removed since the war with Iran began.

The oil is stored in underground salt caverns in Texas and Louisiana. Oil is removed by pumping water into the bottom of a cavern, which pushes the crude toward the surface. The reserve was designed to release oil about six times faster than it can be refilled.

The salt caverns also have physical limits. They were designed to remain stable for up to five full drawdowns. Repeated withdrawals alter the caverns. Every drawdown expands their volume and reduces the spacing between neighboring caverns, shortening their long term viability. Three of the six caverns at Bayou Choctaw have only one expected drawdown remaining, and two may have developed a pathway between them that could limit their safe use.

The reserve cannot be completely emptied with the assumption that it can simply be filled back to its former capacity later. Refilling takes far longer than withdrawing, and the caverns, wells, pumps and pipelines must remain capable of safely receiving the oil. The Government Accountability Office warns that aging infrastructure, maintenance backlogs and operational limitations are already putting that ability at risk.

We are using the country’s emergency oil while the infrastructure moving global oil is being attacked.

That is one more reason households should be prepared to handle temporary losses of electricity, water, communications, fuel access, refrigeration, electronic payments and regular deliveries.

Keep water, food, medications, animal supplies, cash, batteries, lighting and a radio. Maintain vehicles, generators and equipment before they are needed. Have a way to cook and a plan for communicating when phones or the internet are unavailable. Know where family members will meet if normal communications fail.

These preparations are useful whether the disruption comes from war, a cyberattack, sabotage, an extreme storm or a grid failure. They give people time to think and respond instead of being forced into immediate panic.

The structure is now visible. Saudi oil infrastructure is under Houthi fire. Ukraine has attacked an Iranian vessel. Russia is preparing for a possible mass deployment of North Korean troops. China is physically confronting an American treaty ally while holding live fire exercises around Taiwan and near Japan. Iranian affiliated actors are targeting technology used to operate American infrastructure. The United States is rapidly drawing down an emergency oil reserve that cannot be emptied and restored without consequences.

World War Three has materialized through alliances, troop movements, intelligence sharing, attacks on energy systems and expanding military fronts.

We are in for a long ride.

SOURCES















 
View: https://twitter.com/i/status/2083834214341091817


Over the last few weeks, the situation for Ukraine on the frontline has rapidly deteriorated in an unprecedented manner not seen since early 2025.

In the northeastern corner Kharkiv Oblast, Russia has achieved two localised breakthroughs, threatening to encircle more than 360 km² of Ukrainian-controlled territory.

In the Dobropillya direction, one of the most formidable Ukrainian strongholds which has stood for over a year has been breached, with Russian forces now flooding Ukrainian positions in the urban agglomeration between Pokrovsk and Dobropillya.

In the Kramatorsk/Slovyansk direction, Ukraine has been unable to slow down Russian advances, with Russia now coming within 4.7 km of both Slovyansk and Kramatorsk, and coming close to fully capturing the crucial tactical ridgeline east of these two final Donbas cities.

In the Kostyantynivka direction, Russia has captured Chasiv Yar after 840 days of battles, and has almost completed the capture of Kostyantynivka. The salient west of Chasiv Yar is falling apart day by day as Ukraine withdraws.

In the Druzhkivka direction, Russia achieved a localised breakthrough of up to 6 km, capturing 3 villages and entering 3 others, coming within 5.1 km of Druzhkivka, and threatening the Ukrainian salient west of Kostyantynivka with encirclement.

In the Omelnyk direction, Russia has finally captured the Ukrainian stronghold town of Zaliznychne after over 7 months of battles, and are making new advances west of the Haichur River towards Vozdyvzhivka.

In the Stepnohirsk direction, Russia has halted the Ukrainian counterattacks and have begun retaking previously lost ground, advancing northeast of Kamyanske and north from Mali Shcherbaky.

In the Kupyansk direction, the crucial Ukrainian bridgehead east of the Oskil River continues to shrink day by day, with Russian forces expanding their zone of control in the area of Novosynove, Kivsharivka, Pishchane, Petropavlivka, and Kupyansk itself.

Ukraine is losing incredibly important defensive positions necessary for holding the frontline in the future, especially the areas south of Dobropillya which should not be falling this quickly. However, they are seemingly intent on concentrating their assault forces in counterattacks north of Lyman, west of Komar, and south of Novopavlivka, which have questionable (at best) strategic reasoning for the heavy cost being endured.

The new Ukrainian Commander-in-Chief Mykhailo Drapatyi has inherited a situation that is getting worse by the day, and will have to make some serious and difficult decisions in order to try stabilise it towards the end of Summer.
 

Ukraine Landocked; Russia Cuts Off Odessa Land Sea Routes; Rassvet Begins Operating; Merz Implodes​

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hgz6VFq3Wk

Run time - 52:29
Aug 2, 2026

00:00:00 Introduction from Chattanooga convention
00:01:14 Russian missile and drone strikes overnight
00:02:34 Odessa and Black Sea ports under heavy attack
00:03:15 Ukraine now landlocked, no rerouting via Romania
00:03:56 Zatoka bridge hit in major strike
00:07:25 Comparing Zatoka bridge to Crimea bridge situation
00:11:37 Odessa shipping isolated, 80 ships hit in July
00:14:34 Zatoka bridge logistics importance for Ukraine
00:15:51 Russian ground advances in Donbass and Kharkov
00:17:14 Ukraine launches roughly 1000 drones at Russia
00:19:40 Russian drone debris comments and skepticism
00:20:27 Wildberries warehouses attacked, Tatiana Kim responds
00:25:35 Russia retaliates against Ukrainian ecommerce warehouses
00:27:36 Rasvet satellite system update, Russia's Starlink analog
00:34:29 US pulls back from Wiesbaden Ukraine HQ
00:35:56 UK coalition of the willing wobbling under Burnham
00:38:33 France's Macron succession threatens project Ukraine
00:39:44 Germany's Merz in serious political trouble
00:49:26 Trump calls off Iran strike, Hormuz standoff
00:51:39 Closing remarks
 

Russia Traps Kiev Troops NE Kharkov; Desperate Zelensky Ceasefire Call Zaluzhny Says NATO Powerless​

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5N6mAaXxRM

Run time - 1:21:08
Aug 4, 2026

00:00:00 Mercouris returns to London from Chattanooga
00:01:07 A real turning point in the Ukraine war
00:03:30 Zelensky reverts to ceasefire demands
00:08:22 Why this is a retreat for Zelensky
00:12:36 Ukraine's 40 day drone campaign fails
00:14:41 Russia's fuel situation stabilizes
00:18:44 Wildberries drones and rising Russian PMI
00:23:34 Ukraine targets Black Sea holiday resorts
00:30:42 Fastest Russian advance since October 2024
00:31:18 Commanders blame failed counteroffensives
00:34:37 Russia's drone umbrella tactics explained
00:37:04 Fire sack tactics devastate Ukrainian troops
00:40:24 Ukrainian troops trapped in Kharkov region
00:44:06 Zaluzhny says Ukraine will never join NATO
00:47:11 Zaluzhny pitches an EU army instead
00:57:25 Zaluzhny's speech as a bid for power
01:00:02 Predicting Europe's coming ceasefire panic
01:07:08 Iran denies Hormuz talks with the US
01:12:51 US missile stockpiles running critically low
01:15:47 Jordan warns of a Temple Mount crisis
 
For maps please see source article. HC

Posted for fair use......

Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, August 6, 2026​


August 6, 2026​

Analyst Notes​


Assessment as of: 7:20 PM ET. Data Cutoff: 11:45 AM ET

Toplines​

Lithuanian officials continue warning of a possible Russian false-flag operation against NATO’s eastern flank using seized Ukrainian drones. Lithuanian Defense Minister Robertas Kaunas stated on August 6 that Russia may use Ukrainian-manufactured drones to conduct a false-flag operation against the Baltic states.[1] Polish Deputy Prime Minister and Defense Minister Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz issued a similar warning on July 21 that Russia may use seized Ukrainian drones to conduct a sabotage attempt against NATO, along with other recent Western warnings.[2] Ukrainian military outlet Militarnyi reported on August 1, citing images published by former Ukrainian Presidential Advisor on Defense Technologies Serhiy “Flash” Beskrestnov, that Russia has potentially begun using seized Ukrainian long-range drones for potential provocations.[3] Latvian Defense Minister Raivis Melnis stated on August 6 that there are no indicators of imminent Russian aggression against any critical infrastructure in Latvia.[4] ISW continues to assess that Russia is conducting a “Phase Zero” campaign that aims to set informational and psychological conditions for potential future provocations against NATO and that Russian false flag provocations, along with drone incursions, sabotage, electronic warfare interference, and overflights, are part of this campaign.[5] Russia regularly violates Baltic airspace and may do so with Ukrainian drones as part of an information operation and/or false flag attack to test NATO’s response.[6]
Russia continues to form combat units using Ukrainian prisoners of war (POWs) in direct violation of the Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War. The Russian Ministry of Defense’s (MoD) Volunteer Corps announced on August 6 that Russian forces formed the first Ukrainian Volunteer Spetsnaz Brigade comprised of Ukrainian POWs and former Ukrainian servicemembers who allegedly defected to Russia.[7] The Russian military formed this brigade by merging several irregular so-called volunteer units, including the Maxim Krivonos and Alexei Berest battalions and the Alexander Matrosov, Martyn Pushkar, and Slobodskoy detachments (all of which reportedly either are partially comprised of Ukrainian POWs or Ukrainian soldiers who reportedly defected to Russia).[8] At least one Russian military blogger openly discussed how this new brigade is comprised of Ukrainian POWs — a noteworthy statement given the fact that using POWs in combat is a war crime.[9] ISW first observed reports of Russian forces forming combat units using Ukrainian POWs in November 2022, with the most recent Russian “Bogdan Khmelnitsky” battalion with Ukrainian POWs operating under the Donetsk People’s Republic (DNR) Internal Affairs Ministry’s “Kaskad” formation in western Donetsk Oblast in December 2023.[10] Russia’s use of Ukrainian POWs in combat formations is likely a violation of the Geneva Convention on POWs, which prohibits the use of POWs in military activities on the side of the power that has captured them and states that “no POW may at any time be sent to or detained in areas where he may be exposed to the fire of the combat zone” and shall not “be employed on labor which is of an unhealthy or dangerous nature.”[11]
Ukrainian Brigadier General Serhiy Sobko has reportedly assumed the post of the acting Ukrainian Armed Forces deputy commander-in-chief.[12] Sobko previously served as the chief of staff of the 11th Army Corps from January 2024 until now, and as Ukrainian Territorial Defense Forces chief of staff between 2022 and 2024.[13]

Key Takeaways​

  1. Lithuanian officials continue warning of a possible Russian false-flag operation against NATO’s eastern flank using seized Ukrainian drones.
  2. Russia continues to form combat units using Ukrainian prisoners of war (POWs) in direct violation of the Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War.
  3. Ukrainian Brigadier General Serhiy Sobko has reportedly assumed the post of the acting Ukrainian Armed Forces deputy commander-in-chief.
  4. Ukrainian forces continued their long-range strike campaign against Russian oil infrastructure in Russia on the night of August 5 to 6.
  5. Russian forces recently advanced in northern Kharkiv Oblast and the Kostyantynivka-Druzhkivka tactical area.
  6. Russia launched two Onyx anti-ship missiles, two Kh-31P anti-radar missiles, and 101 drones against Ukraine overnight.
We do not report in detail on Russian war crimes because these activities are well-covered in Western media and do not directly affect the military operations we are assessing and forecasting. We will continue to evaluate and report on the effects of these criminal activities on the Ukrainian military and the Ukrainian population and specifically on combat in Ukrainian urban areas. We utterly condemn Russian violations of the laws of armed conflict and the Geneva Conventions and crimes against humanity even though we do not describe them in these reports.

Ukrainian Operations in the Russian Federation​

Ukrainian forces continued their long-range strike campaign against Russian oil infrastructure in Russia on the night of August 5 to 6. Ukrainian officials reported on August 6 that Ukrainian forces struck the Slavneft-Yanos Oil Refinery in Yaroslavl City (roughly 700 kilometers from the international border), causing a large fire.[14] The Ukrainian Security Service (SBU) reported that the strikes damaged four RVS-2000 tanks containing oil, causing an oil spill, and caused fires at the ELOU-1 and AVT-3 refining units.[15] The SBU noted that the Slavneft-Yanos Oil Refinery is one of the largest oil refining enterprises in Russia with a refining capacity of 15 million tons of oil per year. Geolocated footage published on August 6 shows a large fire at the Slavneft-Yanos Oil Refinery following the Ukrainian strike.[16] Yaroslavl Oblast Governor Mikhail Yevrayev acknowledged on August 6 that a Ukrainian drone strike damaged the storage tanks of an oil refinery in Yaroslavl Oblast.[17] Ukrainian officials reported that Ukrainian forces also struck the Bashneft-Novoil Oil Refinery in Ufa, Bashkortostan Republic (about 1,200 kilometers from the international border), which has a refining capacity of 7.1 to 7.3 million tons of oil per year.[18] Ukrainian forces have struck the Bashneft-Novoil refinery at least three times since August 2.[19]
Ukrainian forces continued their strike campaign against Wildberries (the closest Russian equivalent of Amazon) warehouses on August 5 as the company appears to be facing mounting costs for damage repair and merchandise loss compensation. Tver Oblast Governor Vitaly Korolyov claimed on August 6 that a Ukrainian drone strike damaged the facade of a Wildberries logistics facility in Tver Oblast.[20] A Russian insider source claimed on August 6, citing an unnamed source, that Ukrainian forces have struck at least 21 Wildberries logistics facilities representing up to 22 percent of the company’s total reported facility space between July 18 and August 5, causing up to 400 billion rubles (about $4.82 billion) in losses, significant facility damage, and service disruptions.[21] The insider source claimed that Wildberries had not purchased insurance for any of the struck facilities, which would significantly increase the company’s financial liability for damages.[22] The insider source assessed that Wildberries is unlikely to provide enough compensation to cover its retailers’ total revenue losses, which may prompt retailers to transfer their goods to Wildberries’ competitors — a development that would impose a lasting negative impact on Wildberries’ business.[23]
A Ukrainian source provided an updated battle damage assessment (BDA) on a recent Ukrainian strike against industrial infrastructure in the Republic of Tatarstan. A Ukrainian open-source intelligence (OSINT) channel published satellite imagery and reported on August 5 that the July 31 Ukrainian strike against the Nizhnekamskneftekhim Petrochemical Plant near Nizhnekamsk, Republic of Tatarstan (roughly 1,100 kilometers from the international border), destroyed one workshop and likely detonated explosive substances used in polystyrene production.[24]

Russian Supporting Effort: Northern Axis​

Russian objective: Create defensible buffer zones in Sumy Oblast along the international border

Russian forces continued offensive operations in northern Sumy Oblast on August 5 and 6 but did not make confirmed advances.[25] A Russian milblogger claimed on August 6 that Russian forces advanced northwest of Hirky and west of Ryzhivka (both northwest of Sumy City).[26]
A Ukrainian open-source intelligence (OSINT) source reported on August 5 that a Ukrainian drone struck a Russian Yak-40 turbojet passenger aircraft at the Belgorod City Airport.[27]

Russian Main Effort: Eastern Ukraine​

Russian Subordinate Main Effort #1 Kharkiv Oblast​

Russian objective: Push Ukrainian forces back from the international border to create a defensible buffer zone with Belgorod Oblast and approach to within tube artillery range of Kharkiv City

Ukrainian forces recently advanced northeast of Kharkiv City. Geolocated footage published on August 5 indicates that Ukrainian forces advanced in northern Lyman and in eastern Vovchansk (both northeast of Kharkiv City).[28]

Kharkiv Oblast Administration Head Oleh Synehubov stated on August 5 that Ukrainian authorities evacuated around 200 civilians from 80 settlements in northern Kharkiv Oblast due to Russian strikes.[29]


Russian forces conducted limited offensive operations in the Velykyi Burluk direction on August 6 but did not make confirmed advances.[30] A Russian milblogger claimed on August 6 that Russian forces advanced south of Bereznyky (northeast of Velykyi Burluk).[31]


Russian Subordinate Main Effort #2 – Oskil River​


Russian objective: Cross the Oskil River in Kharkiv Oblast and push westward into eastern Kharkiv Oblast and northern Donetsk Oblast


Russian forces continued offensive operations in the Kupyansk and Borova directions on August 5 and 6 but did not advance.[32]


Ukrainian forces continued their intermediate-range strike campaign against fuel infrastructure in occupied Luhansk Oblast.
Geolocated footage published on August 3 shows a Ukrainian fiber-optic drone striking a gas station in northern Rubizhne (roughly 30 kilometers from the frontline).[33]


Continued.....
 
Continued......

Russian Subordinate Main Effort #3 – Donetsk Oblast​


Russian objective: Capture the entirety of Donetsk Oblast, the claimed territory of Russia’s proxies in Donbas, and advance into Dnipropetrovsk Oblast


Russian forces conducted offensive operations in the Slovyansk direction on August 5 and 6 but did not make confirmed advances.[34] A Russian milblogger claimed on August 6 that Russian forces advanced into southern Dibrova and southwest of Ozerne (both northeast of Slovyansk).[35]


Ukrainian forces conducted frontline strikes against Russian military assets in the Slovyansk direction on August 5 and 6. Geolocated footage published on August 5 shows Ukrainian forces using a guided bomb unit (GBU) to strike a Russian command post in Soledar (roughly 13 kilometers from the frontline).[36] Geolocated footage published on August 6 shows Ukrainian forces striking a Russian BM-21 Grad multiple launch rocket system (MLRS) near Torske (roughly four kilometers from the frontline).[37]


Russian forces recently advanced and conducted infiltration missions in the Kostyantynivka-Druzhkivka tactical area. Geolocated footage published on August 5 shows Ukrainian forces striking Russian positions south of Krasnyi Kut, in northern Torske, and in northwestern Pryiut (all west of Kostyantynivka), after what ISW assesses were infiltration missions.[38] Russian forces likely infiltrated north through Sofiivka (also west of Kostyantynivka) towards Krasnyi Kut, Torske, and Pryiut, indicating Russian forces advanced up to the eastern outskirts of Sofiivka and infiltrated throughout Sofiivka.

Russian forces continue to conduct flag-raising missions in the Kostyantynivka-Druzhkivka tactical area. A Ukrainian brigade operating in the Kostyantynivka-Druzhkivka tactical area published interviews on August 5 with two Russian prisoners of war (POW) who claimed that their commanders gave them orders to infiltrate Oleksiyevo-Druzhkivka (northwest of Kostyantynivka) and wave their arms in front of a drone in an effort to provide legitimacy to Russian claims that Russian forces seized Oleksiyevo-Druzhkivka.[39] ISW continues to assess that flag-raising tactics are a part of the Kremlin’s cognitive warfare effort to exaggerate Russian gains and create a false perception of military strength.[40]


Russian strikes against Ukrainian drone control points and personnel concentrations are reportedly hindering Ukrainian freedom of maneuver in the Druzhkivka direction. A Ukrainian military source reported on August 5 that Russian forces continue to conduct airstrikes against Ukrainian drone control points and personnel concentrations in the Druzhkivka direction to restrict Ukrainian forces’ freedom of maneuver.[41] The Ukrainian military source stated that coordination between the Russian Rubicon Center for Advanced Unmanned Technologies and the Russian Aerospace Forces (VKS) in this direction significantly increases the effectiveness of Russian airstrikes.


Russian forces recently conducted an infiltration mission in the Dobropillya tactical area. Geolocated footage published on August 6 shows two Russian servicemembers raising flags in western and central Chernihivka (formerly Krasnoyarske), after what ISW assesses was an infiltration mission.[42] Russian milblogger claimed on August 6 that Russian forces advanced into central Hannivka (northeast of Dobropillya), into eastern and southeastern Dobropillya, and northeast of Chernihivka.[43]


Russian forces continue to conduct infiltration missions in the Pokrovsk direction but have not made confirmed advances. Russian milbloggers claimed on August 6 that Russian forces seized Shevchenko and Chernihivka and advanced near Chernihivka (both north of Pokrovsk).[44] A Ukrainian military source rejected these claims on August 6, stating that Chernihivka, Shevchenko, and Svitle (north of Pokrovsk) are contested “gray zones” and that Russian forces are infiltrating into eastern Matyasheve (west of Svitle).[45] The source reported that Russian forces are already infiltrating in the Vodyanske area (between Matyasheve and Svitle) by leveraging gaps between Ukrainian positions and concealment provided by windbreaks in the area.

Russian forces conducted limited ground operations in the Novopavlivka direction on August 5 and 6 but did not advance.[46]
Ukrainian forces are striking Russian tube and rocket artillery in the Russian near rear in the Novopavlivka direction.
Geolocated footage published on August 5 and 6 shows Ukrainian forces striking a Russian D-30 howitzer in Preobrazhenka, a BM-21 Grad multiple launch rocket system (MLRS) in southern Sribne, and a 2S19 Msta-S self-propelled howitzer in southern Novoyelzavetivka (all east of Novopavlivka and about six to nine kilometers from the frontline).[47]
Neither Russian nor Ukrainian forces reported ground activity in the Oleksandrivka direction on August 6.

Russian Supporting Effort: Southern Axis​

Russian objective: Maintain frontline positions, secure rear areas against Ukrainian strikes, and advance within tube artillery range of Zaporizhzhia City

Ukrainian forces recently advanced or maintained positions in the Hulyaipole direction as Russian forces conducted infiltration missions. Geolocated footage published on August 5 shows Russian forces striking a Ukrainian vehicle in northern Vozdvyzhivka (northwest of Hulyaipole), indicating that Ukrainian forces advanced or maintained positions in the area despite Russian claims.[48] Geolocated footage published on August 5 shows a Russian servicemember raising a flag east of Zirnytsya (northwest of Hulyaipole), after what ISW assesses was a Russian infiltration mission.[49] A Ukrainian military source reported on August 5 that Ukrainian forces control Zirnytsya and refuted the Russian claim that Russian forces seized the settlement.[50] A Kremlin-affiliated milblogger claimed on August 5 that Russian forces advanced northwest of Charivne (southwest of Hulyaipole).[51]

Ukrainian forces recently advanced or maintained positions in western Zaporizhia Oblast. Geolocated footage published on August 5 shows Russian forces striking Ukrainian positions in northwestern Mali Shcherbaky (southeast of Zaporizhzhia City and west of Orikhiv), indicating that Ukrainian forces advanced or maintained positions in the area contrary to Russian claims.[52]

Neither Russian nor Ukrainian forces reported ground activity in the Kherson direction on August 6.
Ukrainian forces recently conducted a series of strikes on Russian military drone infrastructure and patrol boats in occupied Kherson Oblast and Crimea.
The Ukrainian General Staff confirmed on August 6 that recent Ukrainian strikes damaged two Russian ground repeater antennas for controlling Geran and Gerbera fixed-wing strike drones in occupied Zaliznyi Port, Kherson Oblast (approximately 47 kilometers from the frontline), and occupied Olenivka, Crimea (likely one of three settlements between approximately 130 to 230 kilometers from the frontline, likely the settlement on the western coast of Crimea 130 kilometers from the frontline).[53] Ukraine’s Security Service (SBU) reported on August 6 that Ukrainian forces struck the ”Balaklava“ and ”Kerch“ project 10410 Svetlyak-class patrol boats of the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) in the port of occupied Kerch, Crimea (approximately 240 kilometers from the frontline).[54]
Ukraine’s strike campaign against Crimea is reportedly degrading Russia’s ability to supply electricity to consumers in the Peninsula. Crimea-based Telegram channel Crimean Wind reported on August 6 that some parts of occupied Feodosia (approximately 243 kilometers from the frontline) have been without power since July 28 as a result of Ukrainian drone strikes.[55]
Ukrainian forces claim to have established fire control over a key Russian ground line of communication (GLOC) connecting occupied Crimea to mainland Russia. A Ukrainian Unmanned Systems Forces (USF) unit reported on August 6 that it established fire control over portions of the M-14 and M-18 highways between occupied Mariupol, Donetsk Oblast and Chonhar, Kherson Oblast and is conducting constant strikes against Russian logistics.[56]

Russian Air, Missile, and Drone Campaign​

Russian Objective: Target Ukrainian military and civilian infrastructure in the rear and on the front line

Russian forces launched a series of missile and drone strikes against Ukraine on the night of August 5 to 6. The Ukrainian Air Force reported on August 6 that Russian forces launched two Onyx anti-ship missiles from occupied Crimea, two Kh-31P anti-radar missiles from airspace over the Black Sea, and 101 Shahed-, Gerbera-, and Italmas-type strike drones, and Parodiya-type decoy drones from the directions of Kursk and Oryol cities; Millerovo, Rostov Oblast; occupied Donetsk City; and occupied Hvardiiske, Crimea.[57] The Ukrainian Air Force reported that Ukrainian forces downed 66 drones, that 29 drones and one Onyx missile hit 18 locations, and that drone and missile debris fell on five locations. Ukrainian officials reported that Russian forces struck commercial, residential, transportation, and agricultural infrastructure in Chernihiv, Dnipropetrovsk, Kharkiv, Odesa, Sumy, and Zaporizhia oblasts.[58] The Ukrainian Energy Ministry reported that Russian strikes caused power outages in Donetsk, Zaporizhia, Kherson, Sumy, and Kharkiv oblasts.[59]
Russian forces continue to strike foreign-flagged merchant vessels travelling to and from Ukrainian ports. Odesa Oblast Military Administration Head Oleh Kiper reported on August 6 that Russian forces struck the Guinea-Bissau-flagged merchant vessel Mera Queen carrying Ukrainian wheat off the coast of Odesa City on the evening of August 5 to 6, killing at least one and injuring at least three.[60]
The Russian campaign against Ukrainian commercial logistics warehouses is beginning to cause significant financial losses for Ukrainian retail companies. The co-founder of Ukrainian online marketplace Rozetka, Vladyslav Chechetkin, stated on August 6 that Russian strikes against Rozetka facilities have caused billions of hryvnias worth of direct losses so far.[61] Forbes Ukraine reported on August 6 that Russian strikes since July 2026 have destroyed over 400,000 square meters of warehouse and logistics facility space belonging to Ukrainian postal and retailing entities including Nova Poshta, Fozzy Group, Rozetka, Epicenter, and hundreds of small businesses which store their goods in the warehouses of major companies.[62] Russian milbloggers continue to accuse Ukrainian forces of storing military assets or dual-use goods in commercial warehouses and logistics facilities.[63

Significant Activity in Belarus​

Russian efforts to increase its military presence in Belarus and further integrate Belarus into Russian-favorable frameworks

Russia continues to rely on Belarusian fuel imports to compensate for fuel shortages as a result of Ukraine’s strike campaigns against Russian oil infrastructure and logistics. Reuters reported on August 5, citing two industry sources and its own calculations, that Russian imports of gasoline and diesel from Belarus reached record highs in July 2026, with gasoline imports increasing by 13 percent to 212,000 metric tons and diesel imports doubling to 162,000 tons.[64] Reuters noted that Russia’s gasoline output fell to 65 percent of its seasonal average consumption while diesel production fell to about half of the seasonal average as of early July 2026. Ukraine’s strike campaigns against Russian oil infrastructure and logistics have significantly degraded Russia’s refining capacity, inflicting gasoline and diesel shortages during a busy summer tourist season and requiring Russia to import increasing amounts of gasoline and diesel from Belarus since May 2026.[65]

Note: ISW does not receive any classified material from any source, uses only publicly available information, and draws extensively on Russian, Ukrainian, and Western reporting and social media as well as commercially available satellite imagery and other geospatial data as the basis for these reports. References to all sources used are provided in the endnotes of each update.

Update
Aug 6, 2026

Russia & Ukraine
Ukraine

Russian Occupation Update, August 6, 2026

READ MORE
 
Top