RUNAWAY CLIMATE CHANGE POSSIBLE

jdhoch

Membership Revoked
http://www9.sbs.com.au/theworldnews/region.php?id=104359&region=3

Scientists at a global warming conference in England say they see potential triggers for runaway climate change but admit that when and how they may be unleashed are quite unknown.

The widespread view of climate change is that it would be progressive, which means humans would have enough time to respond to the crisis and plants and animals have a better chance of adapting to its effects.

But scientists at the conference on global warming say there is also the risk of sudden, catastrophic, irreversible and uncontrollable climate change that could be triggered in as-yet unknown conditions.

"There's still a great deal we don't know about these rapid non-linear events," British scientist Sir John Houghton, a leading member of the UN's top panel on global warming, said.

The climate conference opened to renewed concern about the worsening threat of global warming and appeals from Britain to its ally, the United States, not to stand on the sidelines.

British Environment Secretary Margaret Beckett, in a speech to open the three-day meeting of more than 100 scientists, said all countries emitted greenhouse gases and so the problem required an international response.

"A significant impact (on the world's climate system) is already inevitable," she said.

"What is certainly clear is that temperatures will go on rising... most of the warming we are expecting over the next few decades is now virtually inevitable."

Ms Beckett warned "No one country, not even one continent, can solve the problem by acting alone."

She hailed the Kyoto Protocol, the UN's pact on carbon pollution, which takes life on February 16 after more than seven years of haggling to complete its rulebook and secure its ratification.

"Kyoto is very much a first step"," said Ms Beckett, who also lobbied for clean technology and encouragement for developing countries not to follow rich nations down the path of fossil-fuel pollution.

Analysts say the prospects for Kyoto are clouded at best, given that it lacks the United States, the world's No. 1 carbon polluter.

US President George Bush declared in 2001 that the deal was too expensive for the oil-dependent American economy.

Ms Beckett admitted it was "out of the question" for Washington to return to Kyoto after this walkout, but "we would like to see America engaging very much more fully" in international cooperation on carbon pollution.
 

Troke

On TB every waking moment
Is it not true that the last ice age came in just a few years, rather than over centuries as once thought?

I thought that was considered a scientific fact.

If so, what else is new?
 

Eddie Willers

Membership Revoked
But scientists at the conference on global warming say there is also the risk of sudden, catastrophic, irreversible and uncontrollable climate change that could be triggered in as-yet unknown conditions.

"There's still a great deal we don't know about these rapid non-linear events," British scientist Sir John Houghton, a leading member of the UN's top panel on global warming, said.

Translation: "We don't have a clue about much of anything, but if you give us more government grant money, we'll keep whipping up hysteria for you!


Look at what the guy said! Can you people really take anything he says seriously? Just because he ostensibly has a "Phd" after his name???

Eddie
 
T

Tempus

Guest
Dumb and Dumber!!! Fire those overeducated and simple minded scientists and let the groundhogs make policy.

Tempus
 

Plowboy

Inactive
Kyoto would be a day late and dollar short.. as far how long it takes to flip the climate... ask the myriads of frozen mammoths in Siberial that have undiigested "butter Cips" in their stomachs....

Another interesting point is the beds of "fresh frozen vegetation" that is being revealed from retreating glaciers. The DNA is intact, and was frozen about 5700 years ago, samples from the Andes, and Himalayas agree in their dating information.

:shr:
 

Delta

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Ms Beckett warned "No one country, not even one continent, can solve the problem by acting alone."

My understanding is that the primary problem with Kyoto was that it was a bunch of rules drawn up by the "international community" from which all countries were exempted except the US. No country can solve the problem by acting alone . . . nor can it be solved by putting all the responsibility on one country. The oil and gas we burn is a lot cleaner that the wood and coal burned in many countries.

And, no one has yet to establish just what role fossil fuel burning has upon global warming. The earth's climate has been warming for three or four hundred years. And--hold on here--it has warmed significantly at the end of every ice age maximum. In other words, it has warmed before. And then it gets colder for a few thousand years. Man had absolutely nothing to do with the previous periods of warming. Whether or not he's helping it along now is still an unanswered question. But the politicians and unAmericans are certainly willing to make that assumption to further their agenda. And because they are so quick to attack without facts, they've spoiled their credibility IMHO.
 
Top