POL Report: Trump Asks For “No More Of Jared’s Woke Sh*t”

Dennis Olson

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
summit.news/2020/07/03/report-trump-asks-for-no-more-of-jareds-woke-sht/

Report: Trump Asks For “No More Of Jared’s Woke Sh*t”

Source claims Trump regrets listening to Kushner in the past.

Published 3 days ago on 3 July, 2020
Steve Watson
2-3 minutes

According to a report from Axios, President Trump is done listening to his son-in-law Jared Kushner, telling White House staff he wants “No more of Jared’s woke shit”.

Speaking anonymously, a source claimed that Trump regrets listening to Kushner in the past, and feels that it has cost him vital support among his base.

The final straw appears to have been the recent anti-police sentiment stirred up by rioters coinciding with Kushner’s continued pushing for Trump to get on board with the prison reform bill.

If Trump were to undercut police in any fashion, it could be construed as hypocritical, given his pledge to support law enforcement unequivocally.

The report also notes that Trump listens carefully to Tucker Carlson, who has continually warned of the perils of listening to Kushner’s policy advice.


“He often derides Kushner as a liberal,” Carlson said during a recent fiery segment.

“And that’s correct, Kushner is. But Kushner has convinced the president that throwing open the prisons is the key to winning African American votes in the fall and that those votes are essential to his reelection.” Carlson further warned.

Axios notes that a second senior White House official denies that there is any rift between Trump and Kushner, saying that “Numerous anonymous sources have attempted to provide separation between Jared and the president. They have failed for the last three and a half years. They are not going to be successful today either.”

summit.news

Report: Trump Asks For “No More Of Jared’s Woke Sh*t”

Source claims Trump regrets listening to Kushner in the past.
summit.news
 
Hawkgirl_70

Hawkgirl_70

Veteran Member
I would like to hope he's now ignoring Jared but I think this is just a story leaked to rally the base because we don't like him.
Let's see them move back to New York and stay there, where we can publicly see them here and there, coming and going and not inside the White House.
 
SouthernBreeze

SouthernBreeze

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Hawkgirl_70 said:
I would like to hope he's now ignoring Jared but I think this is just a story leaked to rally the base because we don't like him.
Let's see them move back to New York and stay there, where we can publicly see them here and there, coming and going and not inside the White House.
Click to expand...

Yeah. If this is true, I expect to see Jared and Ivanka having all their credentials taken away, and removed from the White House.
 
20Gauge

20Gauge

TB Fanatic
I really have no problem with many of those who have been convicted on possession charges to set free. To me everyone can put what they want into their system. Just leave me alone with that crap. Too many have gone to jail for the weed or even cocaine. Not my business. Have at it.
 
ArisenCarcass

ArisenCarcass

Veteran Member
20Gauge said:
I really have no problem with many of those who have been convicted on possession charges to set free. To me everyone can put what they want into their system. Just leave me alone with that crap. Too many have gone to jail for the weed or even cocaine. Not my business. Have at it.
Click to expand...

In many municipalities, prison time (as opposed to jail time) comes from "possession with intent to distribute."
"Simple possession" charges are not usually hit with anything major.
Distribution of hard drugs creates crime-blighted areas and no-go zones where both property and violent crimes are more common, so I have no qualms with this approach.
I was anti-Big Pharma during the pill mill opioid epidemic as well (no one should be too big to jail).

I agree that people should have the ability to "use" if they wish, with some caveats:
-no welfare or taxpayer-funded social safety net while on drugs
-no public intoxication at any time
-no imposition on others as a result of condition (bumps up other charges)
-no mandated resuscitation of ODs (no Narcan)

Since this is beyond the capabilities of almost all users in one way or another, I will probably remain relatively anti-drug.....
 
20Gauge

20Gauge

TB Fanatic
ArisenCarcass said:
In many municipalities, prison time (as opposed to jail time) comes from "possession with intent to distribute."
"Simple possession" charges are not usually hit with anything major.
Distribution of hard drugs creates crime-blighted areas and no-go zones where both property and violent crimes are more common, so I have no qualms with this approach.
I was anti-Big Pharma during the pill mill opioid epidemic as well (no one should be too big to jail).

I agree that people should have the ability to "use" if they wish, with some caveats:
-no welfare or taxpayer-funded social safety net while on drugs
-no public intoxication at any time
-no imposition on others as a result of condition (bumps up other charges)
-no mandated resuscitation of ODs (no Narcan)

Since this is beyond the capabilities of almost all users in one way or another, I will probably remain relatively anti-drug.....
Click to expand...
Yes, but as I agree with your conditions, it would be self correcting. Especially with the 4th reason.

I would go farther and not even worry about distribution. The levels chosen are best guesses of behavior. Let them OD and do it on an epic scale. The problem will self correct.
 
twobarkingdogs

twobarkingdogs

Veteran Member
ArisenCarcass said:
-no welfare or taxpayer-funded social safety net while on drugs
Click to expand...

So you're saying that a 75 year old person on SS can't smoke a little weed to help with the pain in his joints. I'm not going to agree with that. Food stamps or other benefits given to working age adults, Yes, but not a blanket statement such as you made.

tbd
 
TKO

TKO

Veteran Member
twobarkingdogs said:
So you're saying that a 75 year old person on SS can't smoke a little weed to help with the pain in his joints. I'm not going to agree with that. Food stamps or other benefits given to working age adults, Yes, but not a blanket statement such as you made.

tbd
Click to expand...
My granny used to have a scrip she used. Marijuana tincture of some sort. It was green and had marijuana and rubbing alcohol mixed together. She'd rub it on her arthritic joints. She got quite a bit of pain relief from it.
 
ArisenCarcass

ArisenCarcass

Veteran Member
twobarkingdogs said:
So you're saying that a 75 year old person on SS can't smoke a little weed to help with the pain in his joints. I'm not going to agree with that. Food stamps or other benefits given to working age adults, Yes, but not a blanket statement such as you made.

tbd
Click to expand...

To get Social Security you have to have paid in and accumulated enough points.
The original system was supposed to be more like forced retirement savings rather than the ponzi scheme that it has turned into.
Even the most optimistic projections show that I will never see a dime that I've paid in (you're welcome, boomers).

I have a problem with every Tom and Harry Richard getting SS Disability for SAD (Substance Abuse DIsorder).
Get off the drugs and you won't be SAD, ya Dick. Though you may be sad that the taxpayer isn't paying for your SAD.....

Surely some drugs are worse than others, and some means of use are worse than others.
One can use CBD's for pain relief without getting the THC high (the two are inversely proportional in most MJ).
 
Melodi

Melodi

Disaster Cat
ArisenCarcass said:
To get Social Security you have to have paid in and accumulated enough points.
The original system was supposed to be more like forced retirement savings rather than the ponzi scheme that it has turned into.
Even the most optimistic projections show that I will never see a dime that I've paid in (you're welcome, boomers).

I have a problem with every Tom and Harry Richard getting SS Disability for SAD (Substance Abuse DIsorder).
Get off the drugs and you won't be SAD, ya Dick. Though you may be sad that the taxpayer isn't paying for your SAD.....

Surely some drugs are worse than others, and some means of use are worse than others.
One can use CBD's for pain relief without getting the THC high (the two are inversely proportional in most MJ).
Click to expand...
THC is needed for nausea control for many cancer patients, CBD is good for a lot of pain. Israel is developing some very high THC strains for medical use.
 
M

MetalMan

Veteran Member
Well, I'm not afraid to say it. My support for Trump has not changed since the day he called Jeb Bush, (the un-anointed anointed one in 2016), low energy Jeb. I haven't always agreed with him but never was an issue a deal killer. I still support Trump and I think the only true news coming from any MSM source today is "Trumps base is unmovable. Nothing can weaken it."
 
W

waterdog

Senior Member
ArisenCarcass said:
To get Social Security you have to have paid in and accumulated enough points.
The original system was supposed to be more like forced retirement savings rather than the ponzi scheme that it has turned into.
Even the most optimistic projections show that I will never see a dime that I've paid in (you're welcome, boomers).

I have a problem with every Tom and Harry Richard getting SS Disability for SAD (Substance Abuse DIsorder).
Get off the drugs and you won't be SAD, ya Dick. Though you may be sad that the taxpayer isn't paying for your SAD.....

Surely some drugs are worse than others, and some means of use are worse than others.
One can use CBD's for pain relief without getting the THC high (the two are inversely proportional in most MJ).
Click to expand...
Well this "boomer" paid into s.s. every year for 51 years.My employer matched the contribution. I collect check each month no guilt. In 51 years I never collected a penny in unemployment or welfare. Don't feel guilty cashing that check. By the way "boomers" are not the cause of all society's problems. How I spend it is nobody's business.
 
ArisenCarcass

ArisenCarcass

Veteran Member
waterdog said:
Well this "boomer" paid into s.s. every year for 51 years.My employer matched the contribution. I collect check each month no guilt. In 51 years I never collected a penny in unemployment or welfare. Don't feel guilty cashing that check. By the way "boomers" are not the cause of all society's problems. How I spend it is nobody's business.
Click to expand...

OK. Not really what I was getting at, since I was targeting drugs/druggies. But by all means, let's go there.

The politicians that have been elected since the Great Depression and the resulting implementation of the welfare state took the initial forced retirement savings (recoup of which were set to start at an age when the average person was already dead) and made the system into a ponzi scheme where there is no investment and interest.

Boomers (and their parents and their children) ARE to blame. You allowed the system to get to this point. You elected the politicians that led us to this point.
Cash your check. Feel as little guilt as you want. Use it how you want. But know that inaction, political uninterest, and selling the future generation's wealth for your (mostly past) entertainment and standard of living should make you feel guilt. We didn't get to this point in a vacuum.
You are NOT blameless.

I didn't create the situation we are in. I was born into it and will do the best I can in it. Me and mine will be among those young enough bear the brunt of the probable coming reset.


Sorry for the thread drift.
 
W

waterdog

Senior Member
ArisenCarcass said:
OK. Not really what I was getting at, since I was targeting drugs/druggies. But by all means, let's go there.

The politicians that have been elected since the Great Depression and the resulting implementation of the welfare state took the initial forced retirement savings (recoup of which were set to start at an age when the average person was already dead) and made the system into a ponzi scheme where there is no investment and interest.

Boomers (and their parents and their children) ARE to blame. You allowed the system to get to this point. You elected the politicians that led us to this point.
Cash your check. Feel as little guilt as you want. Use it how you want. But know that inaction, political uninterest, and selling the future generation's wealth for your (mostly past) entertainment and standard of living should make you feel guilt. We didn't get to this point in a vacuum.
You are NOT blameless.

I didn't create the situation we are in. I was born into it and will do the best I can in it. Me and mine will be among those young enough bear the brunt of the probable coming reset.


Sorry for the thread drift.
Click to expand...
keep paying your taxes I need a raise. Bitch all you want. I'll remain a selfish "boomer"
 
MinnesotaSmith

MinnesotaSmith

Membership Revoked
20Gauge said:
I really have no problem with many of those who have been convicted on possession charges to set free. To me everyone can put what they want into their system. Just leave me alone with that crap. Too many have gone to jail for the weed or even cocaine. Not my business. Have at it.
Click to expand...

Only if they're productive and/or conservative native-borns, preferably whites. The rest can FOAD. Any black in prison (or wetback/Muzzie/dothead that gets sent back) can't commit crimes against normals, reproduce, get welfare, or take a job that a more deserving Heritage American could have held.
 
O

Orion Commander

Veteran Member
ArisenCarcass said:
To get Social Security you have to have paid in and accumulated enough points.
The original system was supposed to be more like forced retirement savings rather than the ponzi scheme that it has turned into.
Even the most optimistic projections show that I will never see a dime that I've paid in (you're welcome, boomers).

I have a problem with every Tom and Harry Richard getting SS Disability for SAD (Substance Abuse DIsorder).
Get off the drugs and you won't be SAD, ya Dick. Though you may be sad that the taxpayer isn't paying for your SAD.....

Surely some drugs are worse than others, and some means of use are worse than others.
One can use CBD's for pain relief without getting the THC high (the two are inversely proportional in most MJ).
Click to expand...
You're welcome. I just looked. I've paid in $86K and so has my employer. I won't feel one bit guilty when I take it.
 
O

Orion Commander

Veteran Member
ArisenCarcass said:
OK. Not really what I was getting at, since I was targeting drugs/druggies. But by all means, let's go there.

The politicians that have been elected since the Great Depression and the resulting implementation of the welfare state took the initial forced retirement savings (recoup of which were set to start at an age when the average person was already dead) and made the system into a ponzi scheme where there is no investment and interest.

Boomers (and their parents and their children) ARE to blame. You allowed the system to get to this point. You elected the politicians that led us to this point.
Cash your check. Feel as little guilt as you want. Use it how you want. But know that inaction, political uninterest, and selling the future generation's wealth for your (mostly past) entertainment and standard of living should make you feel guilt. We didn't get to this point in a vacuum.
You are NOT blameless.

I didn't create the situation we are in. I was born into it and will do the best I can in it. Me and mine will be among those young enough bear the brunt of the probable coming reset.


Sorry for the thread drift.
Click to expand...
Not all boomers voted for the politicians that put us in this mess. I've gotten used to voting for the losers.

Put 15% of your pay invested at paltry 5% for 43 years. You can retire at full pay and never run out of money.
 
TammyinWI

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
But he listened to Kim Kardashian when she went to the WH, about the prison reform thing...and he pardoned some "non-violent drug offenders."
 
Blacknarwhal

Blacknarwhal

Let's Go Brandon!
TammyinWI said:
But he listened to Kim Kardashian when she went to the WH, about the prison reform thing...and he pardoned some "non-violent drug offenders."
Click to expand...

...and? What effect did that have? Or are you just continuing to pound your little NeverTrumper drum because everything looks like a nail given your current tool set?
 
SouthernBreeze

SouthernBreeze

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Not only did Cary give out a huge chunk of his pay for SS over the course of a year for the last 28 yrs. He worked for other companies before he retired from his last job. So, he's been paying into SS for many years. He was wise, though. He's also had a pension fund set up, and also 401k's. If we fail to get his SS checks each month, we still have the others to draw from. He deserves every penny of it.

For those who are just starting out in the job market, or those who have already been at a career, you need to start a pension plan of some sort, too. So, if you fail to receive your long awaited SS checks, you also will have a steady income coming in. Never put all your eggs in one basket.

Now, of course, if the economy goes belly up, no one will be getting anything, I fear. Gold and silver make good investments, too.
 
Last edited:
TammyinWI

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
Blacknarwhal said:
...and? What effect did that have? Or are you just continuing to pound your little NeverTrumper drum because everything looks like a nail given your current tool set?
Click to expand...

I am sorry if you do not approve. This is not a popularity contest, and I am just being honest. I am not going to try to explain. I do not have "TDS," or a drum of that sort to pound. It is just the way it is.

They have been talking and plugging that catchphrase regarding "prison reform," it is all "non-violent drug offenders"...and Trump was all for it. They had released the woman Kardashian advocated for, and also Trump pardoned another 10?

Went to look it up...Alice Johnson was the first, at Kim's behest, and here is a list of others who's sentenced were commuted...not all of the details here, and some of these of interesting in and of themselves:

Trump pardons: Here's a list of all the people Trump has granted clemency

Feb. 19, 2020
On Tuesday, in a flurry of clemency, President Trump pardoned or commuted the sentences of 11 Americans. Typically, presidents pardon or offer commutations to nonviolent drug offenders serving a disproportionately long time behind bars, and they tend to avoid granting clemency or commutations to individuals who could be seen as connected to the administration in some way. But Trump has approached the duty of granting clemency a bit differently, sometimes offering reprieve to former public officials convicted on corruption charges — the kind of questionable justice on which Trump campaigned to rid from Washington.

Axios described Trump's Tuesday actions this way: "Trump pardons the swamp." Here is everyone the president has pardoned or offered commutation to during his tenure, starting with the most recent.

Continued here:

www.mic.com

The good, the bad, and the swampy: A list of everyone Trump has granted clemency

In his final precious moments as president, Donald Trump managed to rise (or lower himself) to the occasion as was largely expected, issuing a last-minute deluge of more than 140 pardons and commutations before boarding Air Force One and leaving the…
www.mic.com www.mic.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top