MSM Nolte: NBC Article Defends 'Cuties' -- Only Conspiracy Theorists Oppose Soft-Core Child Porn

Dennis Olson

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
www.breitbart.com /entertainment/2020/09/17/nolte-nbc-article-defends-cuties-only-conspiracy-theorists-oppose-soft-core-child-porn/

Nolte: NBC Article Defends 'Cuties' -- Only Conspiracy Theorists Oppose Soft-Core Child Porn
John Nolte
3-4 minutes

An NBC News article defends Netflix’s Cuties premised on the idea that only a right-wing conspiracy theorist could oppose soft-core child pornography.

So Netflix releases a movie with countless scenes off 11-year-olds dressed like hookers twerking, which includes countless shots of the camera lingering on 11-year-old butts shaking in short-shorts, 11-year-old legs spread wide-open wearing only bikini shorts, 11-years old girls dry-humping the ground; and NBC believes criticism of such a thing can only come from “the pedophile-obsessed American right, driven by QAnon.”

We’re told by the left “Baby It’s Cold Outside” is dangerous. So it’s blacklisted.

We’re told by the left Kindergarten Cop is dangerous. So it’s blacklisted.

And then we’re told by the left only a TrumpTard could be outraged by close-up crotch shots of 11-year-old girls in Daisy Dukes.

The piece is some 1200 words long and nowhere does it suggest that Cuties’ critics are anything other cynically motivated right-wingers, are anything other than “a hodgepodge of insane far-right conspiracy theories called QAnon, a movement that posits that senior Democrats, Hollywood executives and media barons feast, quite literally, on children, whom they also molest.”

Nowhere does the NBC piece leave open the possibility that well-intentioned people are horrified by a movie that sexually exploits children.

Honestly, how much further can the left and the media fall?

Trust me, there is no bottom.

The left are not only vigorously defending the hyper-sexualization of prepubescent girls, they are attacking anyone horrified by what was done to a handful of very young actresses as wackos and liars who just like trolling the librallllz.

After same sex marriage, we asked ourselves what the left’s nonstop envelope-pushing would attempt to normalize next.

Well, we found out. We’re now required to have our daughters share a restroom with a 45-year-old man wearing a wig and pantyhose.

“What could possibly come after that?” we asked.

Welcome to Drag Queen Story Hour.

Welcome to 11-year-old drag queens celebrated on ABC News.

What could possibly come after that? we asked again…

Well, now we know… It is not only perfectly okay to portray 11-year-old girls as sex objects, if you oppose such a thing you’re a conspiracy theorist, a nut, a troll. So…

What could possibly be next?

Think about this…

If ten years ago a conservative had appeared on CNN or MSNBC and said that in ten years the media would defend months of rioting, looting, arson and murder; would celebrate an 11-year-old drag queen, blacklist anyone who believed in biological sex, and champion a movie that treated 11-year-old girls like strippers, that person would have been laughed off the air as a conspiracy theorist.

There is no bottom.

Democrats, Hollywood, and the elite media are actively looking to normalize child pornography for the vilest of reasons.

Follow John Nolte on Twitter @NolteNC. Follow his Facebook Page here.
 
Doomer Doug

Doomer Doug

TB Fanatic
It is either or with pedophile behavior. Pedophilloa is the "other" non recoverable spiritual choice. Anybody who rapes children, or eats human flesh, cannibalism, is forever doomed by God. If nothing else, the two choices mean America knows what to expect now that BOTH pedophillia and cannabilism are being mainstreamed in our society.
Individual Americans have a shot, at least those of us who don't engage in these deviant behaviors do, but our society will be vomited out of the land to use the Old Testament phrase.
Netflix is streaming child porn. Period. The results for our society will be lethal.
 
packyderms_wife

packyderms_wife

Neither here nor there.
Doomer Doug said:
It is either or with pedophile behavior. Pedophilloa is the "other" non recoverable spiritual choice. Anybody who rapes children, or eats human flesh, cannibalism, is forever doomed by God. If nothing else, the two choices mean America knows what to expect now that BOTH pedophillia and cannabilism are being mainstreamed in our society.
Individual Americans have a shot, at least those of us who don't engage in these deviant behaviors do, but our society will be vomited out of the land to use the Old Testament phrase.
Netflix is streaming child porn. Period. The results for our society will be lethal.
Click to expand...


wait, what when did cannibalism become mainstream??? Or are you referencing Silence of the Lambs?
 
adgal

adgal

Veteran Member
This is from a Family Therapist's Facebook post:
Brie Turns
was
0CFvxor_fb5.png
watching
Cuties Netflix
.
StepdnSmtlpembeothenr i1s1 deonrsuaedtd 1sel1:4fs6 PunMSedh
·
For more information on parenting visit
The Family Therapist
.
The newest movie "Cuties" seems to be causing quite the stir due to the graphic sexual scenes that are soft, child pornography. I chose to watch the movie and draw my own conclusion.
*Warning: This post may be a bit much for some*
The exploitation of young girls is not the first thing you need to be worried about with the show. As a family therapist who works with young girls, Cuties is far more damaging than the graphic dance scenes.
1) The movie portrays the "cool girls" (AKA Cuties) as the desirable group to be a part of. The main character overhears the group of girls watching pornography and discussing the normalization of providing blow jobs and discussing the importance of penis size.
2) Next, the girls watch a video of (supposedly) older girls dancing and then flashing the camera in order to get "likes" on social media.
3) As older men (with facial hair) attempt to hit on the girls and ask their age, the girls respond "14" and tell the new girl that this should always be her response.
4) While video chatting with a older male, the girls keep the camera off while asking him if he would like to "touch my tits."
5) After teaching herself to grind on the floor and twerk, the main character twerks for two VERY old security guards in order to avoid being arrested.
6) After being caught stealing an older, male's phone (maybe family member), the main character starts to undress in front of him (assuming this will encourage him to give her the phone). He pushes her away and she hides in the restroom. She proceeds to post a photo of her vagina to social media. She does this as a response to another girl pantsing her at school and revealing her "child-like" underwear.
For those of you who made it this far into the post without finding the need to vomit, this is called GROOMING. I am much less concerned (although still concerned) about the graphic humping and grinding dance scenes and far more worried about young children watching this show and thinking:
"This is how I become a women."
"This is how I get attention."
"This is how I get what I want."
"This is how I behave as a respectable woman."
This show is grooming young girls that it's "cool" and normal to seek out the attention of an older male, it's acceptable to act like a stripper if it makes me part of the "cool group", and to get out of trouble or attain things I want, I should seduce men and give them what they want.
I have never been more concerned over a show. This movie needs to be exposed for what it is.... a TOOL FOR GROOMING YOUNG GIRLS.
#cancelnetflix
 
D

Dozdoats

On TB every waking moment
Thousands of American parents PAY to send their preteen, tween and teenage kids (girls AND boys) to "modern dance" classes to learn to do similar things, on stage in front of crowds and cameras.

Tell me again who is sick here.
 
Last edited:
SouthernBreeze

SouthernBreeze

Has No Life - Lives on TB
adgal said:
This is from a Family Therapist's Facebook post:
Brie Turns
was
0CFvxor_fb5.png
watching
Cuties Netflix
.
StepdnSmtlpembeothenr i1s1 deonrsuaedtd 1sel1:4fs6 PunMSedh
·
For more information on parenting visit
The Family Therapist
.
The newest movie "Cuties" seems to be causing quite the stir due to the graphic sexual scenes that are soft, child pornography. I chose to watch the movie and draw my own conclusion.
*Warning: This post may be a bit much for some*
The exploitation of young girls is not the first thing you need to be worried about with the show. As a family therapist who works with young girls, Cuties is far more damaging than the graphic dance scenes.
1) The movie portrays the "cool girls" (AKA Cuties) as the desirable group to be a part of. The main character overhears the group of girls watching pornography and discussing the normalization of providing blow jobs and discussing the importance of penis size.
2) Next, the girls watch a video of (supposedly) older girls dancing and then flashing the camera in order to get "likes" on social media.
3) As older men (with facial hair) attempt to hit on the girls and ask their age, the girls respond "14" and tell the new girl that this should always be her response.
4) While video chatting with a older male, the girls keep the camera off while asking him if he would like to "touch my tits."
5) After teaching herself to grind on the floor and twerk, the main character twerks for two VERY old security guards in order to avoid being arrested.
6) After being caught stealing an older, male's phone (maybe family member), the main character starts to undress in front of him (assuming this will encourage him to give her the phone). He pushes her away and she hides in the restroom. She proceeds to post a photo of her vagina to social media. She does this as a response to another girl pantsing her at school and revealing her "child-like" underwear.
For those of you who made it this far into the post without finding the need to vomit, this is called GROOMING. I am much less concerned (although still concerned) about the graphic humping and grinding dance scenes and far more worried about young children watching this show and thinking:
"This is how I become a women."
"This is how I get attention."
"This is how I get what I want."
"This is how I behave as a respectable woman."
This show is grooming young girls that it's "cool" and normal to seek out the attention of an older male, it's acceptable to act like a stripper if it makes me part of the "cool group", and to get out of trouble or attain things I want, I should seduce men and give them what they want.
I have never been more concerned over a show. This movie needs to be exposed for what it is.... a TOOL FOR GROOMING YOUNG GIRLS.
#cancelnetflix
Click to expand...

Based on this article, the movie is worse than I thought.
 
Looks Harmless

Looks Harmless

Bite Me
adgal said:
This is from a Family Therapist's Facebook post:
Brie Turns
was
0CFvxor_fb5.png
watching
Cuties Netflix
.
StepdnSmtlpembeothenr i1s1 deonrsuaedtd 1sel1:4fs6 PunMSedh
·
For more information on parenting visit
The Family Therapist
.
The newest movie "Cuties" seems to be causing quite the stir due to the graphic sexual scenes that are soft, child pornography. I chose to watch the movie and draw my own conclusion.
*Warning: This post may be a bit much for some*
The exploitation of young girls is not the first thing you need to be worried about with the show. As a family therapist who works with young girls, Cuties is far more damaging than the graphic dance scenes.
1) The movie portrays the "cool girls" (AKA Cuties) as the desirable group to be a part of. The main character overhears the group of girls watching pornography and discussing the normalization of providing blow jobs and discussing the importance of penis size.
2) Next, the girls watch a video of (supposedly) older girls dancing and then flashing the camera in order to get "likes" on social media.
3) As older men (with facial hair) attempt to hit on the girls and ask their age, the girls respond "14" and tell the new girl that this should always be her response.
4) While video chatting with a older male, the girls keep the camera off while asking him if he would like to "touch my tits."
5) After teaching herself to grind on the floor and twerk, the main character twerks for two VERY old security guards in order to avoid being arrested.
6) After being caught stealing an older, male's phone (maybe family member), the main character starts to undress in front of him (assuming this will encourage him to give her the phone). He pushes her away and she hides in the restroom. She proceeds to post a photo of her vagina to social media. She does this as a response to another girl pantsing her at school and revealing her "child-like" underwear.
For those of you who made it this far into the post without finding the need to vomit, this is called GROOMING. I am much less concerned (although still concerned) about the graphic humping and grinding dance scenes and far more worried about young children watching this show and thinking:
"This is how I become a women."
"This is how I get attention."
"This is how I get what I want."
"This is how I behave as a respectable woman."
This show is grooming young girls that it's "cool" and normal to seek out the attention of an older male, it's acceptable to act like a stripper if it makes me part of the "cool group", and to get out of trouble or attain things I want, I should seduce men and give them what they want.
I have never been more concerned over a show. This movie needs to be exposed for what it is.... a TOOL FOR GROOMING YOUNG GIRLS.
#cancelnetflix
Click to expand...
This Cardi B. done up in "artsy fartsy" style. Same message: "Being a whore is empowering, little girls, so start early." No one really need wonder why they're putting the "X" in woman now.
 
Melodi

Melodi

Disaster Cat
Not my religion, but I do know the Catholic Church absolved those poor boys in the plane crash a few decades ago that ONLY ate the flesh of those who had already died when they were trapped for months in the mountains.

So under certain circumstances, cannibalism can be forgiven (at least in the Roman Catholic Church) now they may not be a great guide since they also historically ignored the abuse of children but to be fair it has never been the official line that it is "OK" to do so.

In my book, anyone with intention, harms, or injures or abuses a small child is a nasty piece of work and people with that "attraction" have the lowest "cure" rate of just about any mental condition (and this one is an illness).

Now there is the modern problem of trying to call attraction to younger POST-pubescent young people pedophilia because it isn't - it may be ILLEGAL, it may be wrong and it may land the perp in jail (and it is "icky") but REAL pedophilia is when adults have sex with PRE-pubescent children.

But from what I've seen of this show in terms of trailers and the like - this would "soft porn" even if adult women were performing these dances, which would be OK if it were labeled as "adult entertainment" but using 11-year-olds is wrong, the film should never have been made and I am surprised Netflix hasn't pulled it yet.
 
Lone_Hawk

Lone_Hawk

Resident Spook
Not too many years ago it was feared that you would be charged with child pornography for taking the classic naked baby bath pic to embarrass your child in later life. Now.........
 
Sacajawea

Sacajawea

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Because of a particular personal experience I suffered at the age of 12, it is simply not possible for me to watch such things without taking the shotgun to the tv. Thanks for sharing that "review" and the pro opinion of the therapist, adgirl. That was distasteful enough - although I can distance the written word much better.

And that's really relevant here. Watching something like this on a major broadcast venue as a preteen (or younger) will get through what higher judgement these viewing girls have.

I won't apologize for being biased & judgemental about such things.
 
adgal

adgal

Veteran Member
This is another example of how out of control this is:

Fair use cited:

www.washingtontimes.com

California bill easing penalties for sex with minors lands on governor’s desk

A bill on California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s desk that would reduce criminal penalties for sexual activity between gay teens and young adults has ignited an uproar over sex offenses and LGBTQ rights.
www.washingtontimes.com www.washingtontimes.com

California's Newsom to decide on bill reducing penalties for sex with minors



In this July 23, 2019, file photo, Gov. Gavin Newsom talks to reporters at his Capitol office, in Sacramento, Calif. (AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli, File) **FILE**
In this July 23, 2019, file photo, Gov. Gavin Newsom talks to reporters at his Capitol office, in Sacramento, Calif. (AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli, File) **FILE** more >

Print
By Valerie Richardson - The Washington Times - Friday, September 4, 2020
A bill on California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s desk that would reduce criminal penalties for sexual activity between gay teens and young adults has ignited an uproar over sex offenses and LGBTQ rights.
Senate Bill 145, sponsored by Democratic state Sen. Scott Wiener, would eliminate automatic sex-offender registration for adults who have voluntary oral or anal sex with 14-to-17-year-olds when the offender is within 10 years of the age of the teenager involved.
Judges already have discretion under state law to decide at sentencing whether to register an offender who has uncoerced vaginal sex with a teenage girl aged 14 to 17 within the 10-year age gap.
TOP STORIES
Minneapolis Marxists now cry at the Marxism they brought
Pa. Supreme Court knocks Green Party off ballot, blocking potential Biden spoiler
Anonymous takes aim at QAnon: 'We will not sit idly by while you take advantage of the misinformed'
“Senate Bill 145 is an anti-discrimination law,” Mr. Wiener, a San Francisco legislator who is openly gay, told ABC10. “It ends discrimination against LGBTQ people on the sex offender registry.”
He pushed back against what he called a “massive misinformation campaign” amid escalating national outrage on the right.



Sen. Ted Cruz, Texas Republican, tweeted Thursday that California Democrats “believe we need more adults having sex with children, and when they do, they shouldn’t register as sex offenders.”
Equality California swung back by accusing him of “spreading QAnon’s dangerous lies and conspiracy theories.”


While Democrats argue that the current law treats homosexual offenders more harshly than heterosexuals, Republicans say that relaxing penalties on statutory rape sends a dangerous signal at a time when California is struggling with rising child sex trafficking.

Under SB 145, automatic sex-offender registration would no longer apply to those convicted of “non-forcible sodomy with a minor, oral copulation with a minor, or sexual penetration with a minor,” according to the bill summary.
“I mean, this is unbelievable. What kind of a bill is this?” said Republican Assemblyman Steven Choi during Monday’s floor debate. “What kind of laws are we trying to enact by this body? This is intolerable.”

Both chambers gave final approval to the legislation Monday shortly before adjourning. Mr. Newsom has until Sept. 30 to sign or veto the bill, which passed both houses with no Republican votes.
Democrats emphasized that statutory rape remains illegal under the bill —California’s age of consent is 18 — and that adult offenders, both heterosexual and homosexual, would still be subject to felony charges for violating state law for having sex with minors.

“There’s a lot of hyperbole and a lot of emotions over it that are getting in the way of us seeing that this is purely an equity issue,” said Assemblymember Laura Friedman. “It is not decriminalizing statutory rape by any extent.”
Democratic support was not unanimous. Crossing party lines to join Republicans in opposing the bill was Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez, even though she said she agreed with the “equity argument” made by Equality California and other LGBT groups.

“Any sex is sex. I don’t care who it’s between or what sex act it is,” she said on the Assembly floor. “That being said, I cannot in my mind as a mother understand how sex between a 24-year-old and a 14-year-old could ever be consensual, how it could ever not be a registerable offense.”

Ms. Gonzalez, who chairs the Assembly Appropriations Committee, suggested that the legislature move in the other direction, making the law equitable by removing a judge’s discretion in cases of vaginal intercourse.
“I’ve asked everybody who has sat in my committee for two years, amend both sides of the bill,” said Ms. Gonzalez. “Amend the current situation where one sex act between a 24-year-old and 14-year-old might be considered consensual by a judge, and amend this so we can have equity, because it should be equitable.”

Other Democrats said her suggestion was another question for another time.

“If there is a problem with judges ruling that sex between a 25-year-old and a 14-year-old of any gender is allowable, we should probably take a look at that law, and changing that law, but that is not the question that is in front of us now,” said Ms. Friedman.
Assemblymember Sydney Kamlager said that the “10-year cap is actually consistent with current law,” and that “if folks are challenged with that, I actually urge in the next legislative session to do a bill that focuses on that 10-year gap, but that is not this bill.”
The legislation is supported by the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office; the California District Attorney’s Association, and the California Police Chiefs Association, in part because it would allow the state to stop “wasting resources monitoring an 18-year-old who’s on the registry because he had sex with his 17-year-old boyfriend,” said Ms. Friedman.

Among those urging Mr. Newsom to veto the bill are the California Republican Party and the California Family Council.
Ms. Gonzalez urged lawmakers to scrap the bill and take a look at the sex-offender law in its entirety.
“As much as I want to create an equitable situation, I think this needs to go back to the drawing board,” she said. “I think we need to take up both portions of the code and make a determination.”
SIGN UP FOR DAILY NEWSLETTERS
Manage Newsletters


Copyright © 2020 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
 
Doomer Doug

Doomer Doug

TB Fanatic
mzkitty said:
I haven't been feeling good the past couple of days, and I'm not ill.

I think it's everything rotten going on. People know. They can feel it.

Saw this on the #Portland twitter.

:dvl2:

View attachment 220973
Click to expand...
Yes indeed,Mzkitty. Demons and their hosts roam the city openly now. I can sense them with little trouble now . The final pieces are being put in place to turn Portland into diplomatic terroritory for the Dark Lord himself. I now think Portland will openly declare treason on November 4th no matter what happens on the 3rd.
I literally have one on my building corner: half naked, filthy, screaming at people, shadow boxing at people, on drugs He glares at me and I just stare back. He threw a punch at me yesterday and it didn't connect because I was protected. The spirit is REAL in down town Portland the chaos is coming nationwide.
 
AlfaMan

AlfaMan

Has No Life - Lives on TB
The therapist's description of the show was jaw dropping. Hearing about the show was bad enough-reading her article on it literally blows my mind.
There has got to be some way to censor/remove this show from Netflix. Even cable companies had some standards; how is Netflix even getting away with airing this show?

Disgusting doesn't even begin to cover how I feel about this show. And the network needs to be shut down. Just shut them down.
 
Walrus Whisperer

Walrus Whisperer

Hope in chains...
Lone_Hawk said:
Not too many years ago it was feared that you would be charged with child pornography for taking the classic naked baby bath pic to embarrass your child in later life. Now.........
Click to expand...
I gave my 30 yr old grandson his bare butt pic I took of him in his play pool when I was watching him years ago. He was delighted, he knew I kept it aside just for him, so some jerk couldn't get a hold of it for jollies or whatever. All innocence seems to have gone the way of dinosaurs. This country has damned itself.
 
SouthernBreeze

SouthernBreeze

Has No Life - Lives on TB
I really don't understand the "angry" responses to what I said about the line I copied from the OP. It has been common knowledge that Democrats, Republicans, and all the Elite, not just in the media, run in pedophile circles. Don't believe me, check it out for yourselves. That's why there is such a push to make it legal.
 
dstraito

dstraito

TB Fanatic
There is nothing wrong with pedophilia if you are born again evil. When you worship the dark one nothing is too perverse and the liberals are all about the dark side.
 
thompson

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen
adgal said:
This is another example of how out of control this is:
Fair use cited:
www.washingtontimes.com

California bill easing penalties for sex with minors lands on governor’s desk

A bill on California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s desk that would reduce criminal penalties for sexual activity between gay teens and young adults has ignited an uproar over sex offenses and LGBTQ rights.
www.washingtontimes.com www.washingtontimes.com
California's Newsom to decide on bill reducing penalties for sex with minors
Click to expand...

Pretty sure he signed it into law over this past weekend.
 
rob0126

rob0126

Veteran Member
SouthernBreeze said:
I really don't understand the "angry" responses to what I said about the line I copied from the OP. It has been common knowledge that Democrats, Republicans, and all the Elite, not just in the media, run in pedophile circles. Don't believe me, check it out for yourselves. That's why there is such a push to make it legal.
Click to expand...

It's hard for folks to briefly ponder on such notions of evil of the people they hold up as righteous.

Truth be known, an honest and righteous politician is as rare as cheap and plentiful 9mm ammo.
 
Daytonabill0001

Daytonabill0001

Wheat or Tare, which are you?
Dennis Olson said:
An NBC News article defends Netflix’s Cuties premised on the idea that only a right-wing conspiracy theorist could oppose soft-core child pornography.
Click to expand...
Well then, I guess I'm in good standing as one of those "right-wing conspiracy theorists." :angl:

But boy oh boy, they're going to pay as the curse follows them for the rest of their natural lives...
 
Doomer Doug

Doomer Doug

TB Fanatic
Melodi said:
Not my religion, but I do know the Catholic Church absolved those poor boys in the plane crash a few decades ago that ONLY ate the flesh of those who had already died when they were trapped for months in the mountains.

So under certain circumstances, cannibalism can be forgiven (at least in the Roman Catholic Church) now they may not be a great guide since they also historically ignored the abuse of children but to be fair it has never been the official line that it is "OK" to do so.

In my book, anyone with intention, harms, or injures or abuses a small child is a nasty piece of work and people with that "attraction" have the lowest "cure" rate of just about any mental condition (and this one is an illness).

Now there is the modern problem of trying to call attraction to younger POST-pubescent young people pedophilia because it isn't - it may be ILLEGAL, it may be wrong and it may land the perp in jail (and it is "icky") but REAL pedophilia is when adults have sex with PRE-pubescent children.

But from what I've seen of this show in terms of trailers and the like - this would "soft porn" even if adult women were performing these dances, which would be OK if it were labeled as "adult entertainment" but using 11-year-olds is wrong, the film should never have been made and I am surprised Netflix hasn't pulled it yet.
Click to expand...
The legal age for pedophila is 12. 13 to 18 is abuse with a few complications. There have been cases like the donner party where the choice was eat or die. This is completely different from a person who enjoys it and chooses it like dahlmer for example.
 
Squib

Squib

Veteran Member
While utterly disgusting to normal westerners like us, no where in Scripture is cannibalism explicitly condemned.

Also, as some have already stated, the various reasons for eating human flesh vary greatly.

Extreme starvation, or ritual practice, or for pleasure.

Of course, murdering the person before eating them is already condemned, but the South American athletes, and other desperate situation is much different from Dahmer and Papua New Guinea Tribes.
 
adgal

adgal

Veteran Member
SouthernBreeze said:
I really don't understand the "angry" responses to what I said about the line I copied from the OP. It has been common knowledge that Democrats, Republicans, and all the Elite, not just in the media, run in pedophile circles. Don't believe me, check it out for yourselves. That's why there is such a push to make it legal.
Click to expand...
I wasn’t angry with you or your comment, I was angry about what those people are doing. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
 
rob0126

rob0126

Veteran Member
ever
Squib said:
While utterly disgusting to normal westerners like us, no where in Scripture is cannibalism explicitly condemned.

Also, as some have already stated, the various reasons for eating human flesh vary greatly.

Extreme starvation, or ritual practice, or for pleasure.

Of course, murdering the person before eating them is already condemned, but the South American athletes, and other desperate situation is much different from Dahmer and Papua New Guinea Tribes.
Click to expand...
everytime cannibalism is mentioned in scripture, its wrapped in judgment.

It ought to be it goes without saying.
 
Hfcomms

Hfcomms

EN66iq
Dozdoats said:
Thousands of American parents PAY to send their preteen, tween and teenage kids (girls AND boys) to "modern dance" classes to learn to do similar things, on stage in front of crowds and cameras.

Tell me again who is sick here.
Click to expand...


Exactly my first thought, where are the ‘parents’ that are allowing their young girls to be abused in this movie? And how many of the girls in this movie have actually been abused right on the set? That this would appear on an American cable channel is bad enough but without sufficient outrage against Netflix and making them suffer real economic and legal pain it will only pave the way for something worse. Camel’s nose under the tent and all that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top