EDUC New York college ‘reproductive justice garden’ features plants promoted as ‘abortifacients’

Kathy in FL

Administrator
_______________

New York college ‘reproductive justice garden’ features plants promoted as ‘abortifacients’​


Pro-life leader says garden could lead to serious health risks or abuse if students use plants

Purchase College, a public university in southeastern New York, is home to a student-run “Reproductive Justice Garden” that features plants promoted because of their abortifacient properties.

Social media posts by the student club appear to encourage people to use the plants in the garden for self-induced abortions — which one pro-life leader told The College Fix she fears could lead to serious health risks or abuse.

The garden, which was launched in 2019 and revamped in 2024, is run by students who are part of the college’s “C.O.P.E.” club, or Collective Organizing for Pleasure and Equity. The group describes itself as a safe space for “females and those assigned female at birth,” and posts on its Instagram account indicate it was active during the spring semester.

A September 2024 post from the garden’s Instagram account highlights the “peacock flower” (Caesalpinia pulcherrima), stating that enslaved black women “would use the peacock flower as an abortifacient” and that “by drinking the seeds, leaves, or flowers of the plant in tea-form, enslaved women could induce a miscarriage.”

The post frames the practice as an act of resistance by enslaved women against forced reproduction under slavery. It does not mention if the peacock flower currently is grown in the garden.

Another post from Sept. 14, 2025 offers instructions on how students can harvest and “collect [plants] from the garden.”

Additionally, a garden layout from an October 2024 Instagram post labels a large section just for “abortifacient” plants. Other sections of the garden are labeled as for “pregnancy/gestation,” “mental health,” and “menstruation.”

image-517x400.webp

The C.O.P.E. club did not respond to The Fix’s request for comment sent via the contact portal on its website.

Meanwhile, pro-life advocates warned that the abortion project raises serious safety concerns.

Melanie Israel, a visiting fellow at The Heritage Foundation, told The College Fix that herbal abortifacients can carry significant risks because their effects and dosages are difficult to control.

“Herbal abortifacients in the hands of unsupportive partners and abusers could be, potentially, even more dangerous than the more predictable (but still risky) FDA-approved drugs,” Israel said.

“The wrong dosage of an herbal method can be toxic,” she said. “There could be a scenario where it’s not just a matter of a forced/coerced/sneaky abortion. It could be a forced abortion that also poisons a woman, using a plant with a really unpredictable margin for error.”

Israel said universities should examine whether projects involving potentially abortifacient substances receive the same oversight as other activities involving hazardous materials.

“Any student or faculty-run project involving a substance capable of causing an abortion, miscarriage, hemorrhage, organ toxicity … that should be subject to the same kind of oversight a chemistry lab or research project involving hazardous materials would be reviewed,” she told The Fix.

The university’s involvement in the garden is unclear. Purchase College media relations did not respond to three requests for comment in recent weeks regarding the nature of the project and source of its funding.

While the garden appears to be organized through a student club, college interns have helped with it, according to an October 2024 post on the club’s Instagram page. Another post says the garden has also received donations from the Purchase Student Government Association, which is funded by mandatory student fees.

Israel said that distinction is significant.

“If it crosses into the territory of providing/distributing plant materials for the intent to cause an abortion, that gets into all kinds of questions about unlicensed practice of medicine and other regulatory questions,” she said. “I’m not asserting that it’s happening, but asking what kind of safeguards are in place raises very serious concerns.”

New York has some of the most liberal abortion laws in the country, but Israel said legal permissibility does not eliminate concerns about university responsibility and liability.

“The university’s legal office should look very carefully about their liability in the event someone experiences a forced/coerced abortion from a university-sanctioned project,” she told The Fix.

Israel said her broader concern is that “with these abortion activists, it appears that the ends justify the means and ‘access’ is more important than the women who end up as collateral damage, forced into abortions they didn’t want.”

The executive director of Feminists Choosing Life of New York also raised concerns about the project, saying it sends the wrong message to women facing unplanned pregnancies.

“The abortion narrative tells pregnant women they must kill their offspring in order to be equal,” Michele Sterlace-Accorsi told The Fix in a recent interview. “It elevates the wombless male anatomy as the standard of equality.”

Rather than supporting projects centered on abortion, colleges should devote their resources to helping pregnant and parenting students succeed, she said.

“From a whole-life feminist perspective, universities and colleges should prioritize creating, maintaining, and expanding comprehensive support systems for pregnant and parenting students — life-affirming solutions that directly address their needs, especially those of low-income women,” Sterlace-Accorsi said.

She also challenged the philosophical premise underlying the garden’s mission.

“Pro-choice feminist arguments that claim ‘abortion is central to women’s liberation’ are anti-feminist, anti-women, and anti-human rights,” she said.

The garden’s promotional materials link to a website, “How to Perform an Abortion,” which describes itself as “a collaborative, research-focused art project.” Its founder, Maureen Connor, is an artist and professor emeritus of Queens College in New York.

Connor’s project aims to demystify and destigmatize “reproductive care,” through projects such as gardens, abortion monuments, workshops, and presentations in public spaces. Other locations for abortion gardens listed on the project website include Barnard College in New York City.

According to the website, the purpose of these gardens is “both as symbol and through function … women need knowledge about existing methods and the means to access them.”

The garden “explores the history of reproductive justice through plants” and “includes herbs that have been used over thousands of years for fertility, contraception and abortion,” according to the website.

The gardens are “comprised of ten plants with abortifacient potential,” the site states.

The website also includes educational materials about historic abortion methods, and states on one page that “no power structure can ultimately stop women from preventing or ending an unwanted pregnancy.”

 
This one is a can of worms.

Women were in charge of their own fertility, yea or nay, for thousands and thousands of years before 'Science and Medicine' became a thing.

All thanks to Woman's knowledge of medicinal plants like this one.


Yes, apples too, but that's not the story I'm telling.

Anthropology is fun until it starts a fight.
I don't like those...

:D
 
Feature Christmas 2008: Food and Drink

Coca-Cola douches and contraception​

BMJ 2008; 337 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a2873 (Published 18 December 2008)Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a2873

  1. Deborah J Anderson, professor of obstetrics/gynaecology and microbiology1, lecturer in medicine2
  2. Author affiliations
  3. Deborah.Anderson@BMC.org
Deborah Anderson explains why women really shouldn’t rely on Coca-Cola for family planning
Coca-Cola douches were a part of folklore about birth control during the 1950s and 1960s, before effective contraceptive methods were readily available.1 It was rumoured that the acidity of Coca-Cola killed sperm, and the classic coke bottle provided a convenient “shake and shoot” applicator. Recently, an old study from our group confirming the spermicidal effects of various Coca-Cola formulations2 was awarded the 2008 IgNobel prize in chemistry.3 The press releases surrounding our IgNobel award might have repopularised this method, and soft drink douches are apparently still used to prevent pregnancy in resource-poor settings.4 There are, however, many reason why women should not rely on this method.
 
Feature Christmas 2008: Food and Drink

Coca-Cola douches and contraception​

BMJ 2008; 337 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a2873 (Published 18 December 2008)Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a2873

  1. Deborah J Anderson, professor of obstetrics/gynaecology and microbiology1, lecturer in medicine2
  2. Author affiliations
  3. Deborah.Anderson@BMC.org
Deborah Anderson explains why women really shouldn’t rely on Coca-Cola for family planning
Coca-Cola douches were a part of folklore about birth control during the 1950s and 1960s, before effective contraceptive methods were readily available.1 It was rumoured that the acidity of Coca-Cola killed sperm, and the classic coke bottle provided a convenient “shake and shoot” applicator. Recently, an old study from our group confirming the spermicidal effects of various Coca-Cola formulations2 was awarded the 2008 IgNobel prize in chemistry.3 The press releases surrounding our IgNobel award might have repopularised this method, and soft drink douches are apparently still used to prevent pregnancy in resource-poor settings.4 There are, however, many reason why women should not rely on this method.
Way too many directions on this one..ill leave it be.
 

New York college ‘reproductive justice garden’ features plants promoted as ‘abortifacients’​


Pro-life leader says garden could lead to serious health risks or abuse if students use plants

Purchase College, a public university in southeastern New York, is home to a student-run “Reproductive Justice Garden” that features plants promoted because of their abortifacient properties.

Social media posts by the student club appear to encourage people to use the plants in the garden for self-induced abortions — which one pro-life leader told The College Fix she fears could lead to serious health risks or abuse.

The garden, which was launched in 2019 and revamped in 2024, is run by students who are part of the college’s “C.O.P.E.” club, or Collective Organizing for Pleasure and Equity. The group describes itself as a safe space for “females and those assigned female at birth,” and posts on its Instagram account indicate it was active during the spring semester.

A September 2024 post from the garden’s Instagram account highlights the “peacock flower” (Caesalpinia pulcherrima), stating that enslaved black women “would use the peacock flower as an abortifacient” and that “by drinking the seeds, leaves, or flowers of the plant in tea-form, enslaved women could induce a miscarriage.”

The post frames the practice as an act of resistance by enslaved women against forced reproduction under slavery. It does not mention if the peacock flower currently is grown in the garden.

Another post from Sept. 14, 2025 offers instructions on how students can harvest and “collect [plants] from the garden.”

Additionally, a garden layout from an October 2024 Instagram post labels a large section just for “abortifacient” plants. Other sections of the garden are labeled as for “pregnancy/gestation,” “mental health,” and “menstruation.”

image-517x400.webp

The C.O.P.E. club did not respond to The Fix’s request for comment sent via the contact portal on its website.

Meanwhile, pro-life advocates warned that the abortion project raises serious safety concerns.

Melanie Israel, a visiting fellow at The Heritage Foundation, told The College Fix that herbal abortifacients can carry significant risks because their effects and dosages are difficult to control.

“Herbal abortifacients in the hands of unsupportive partners and abusers could be, potentially, even more dangerous than the more predictable (but still risky) FDA-approved drugs,” Israel said.

“The wrong dosage of an herbal method can be toxic,” she said. “There could be a scenario where it’s not just a matter of a forced/coerced/sneaky abortion. It could be a forced abortion that also poisons a woman, using a plant with a really unpredictable margin for error.”

Israel said universities should examine whether projects involving potentially abortifacient substances receive the same oversight as other activities involving hazardous materials.

“Any student or faculty-run project involving a substance capable of causing an abortion, miscarriage, hemorrhage, organ toxicity … that should be subject to the same kind of oversight a chemistry lab or research project involving hazardous materials would be reviewed,” she told The Fix.

The university’s involvement in the garden is unclear. Purchase College media relations did not respond to three requests for comment in recent weeks regarding the nature of the project and source of its funding.

While the garden appears to be organized through a student club, college interns have helped with it, according to an October 2024 post on the club’s Instagram page. Another post says the garden has also received donations from the Purchase Student Government Association, which is funded by mandatory student fees.

Israel said that distinction is significant.

“If it crosses into the territory of providing/distributing plant materials for the intent to cause an abortion, that gets into all kinds of questions about unlicensed practice of medicine and other regulatory questions,” she said. “I’m not asserting that it’s happening, but asking what kind of safeguards are in place raises very serious concerns.”

New York has some of the most liberal abortion laws in the country, but Israel said legal permissibility does not eliminate concerns about university responsibility and liability.

“The university’s legal office should look very carefully about their liability in the event someone experiences a forced/coerced abortion from a university-sanctioned project,” she told The Fix.

Israel said her broader concern is that “with these abortion activists, it appears that the ends justify the means and ‘access’ is more important than the women who end up as collateral damage, forced into abortions they didn’t want.”

The executive director of Feminists Choosing Life of New York also raised concerns about the project, saying it sends the wrong message to women facing unplanned pregnancies.

“The abortion narrative tells pregnant women they must kill their offspring in order to be equal,” Michele Sterlace-Accorsi told The Fix in a recent interview. “It elevates the wombless male anatomy as the standard of equality.”

Rather than supporting projects centered on abortion, colleges should devote their resources to helping pregnant and parenting students succeed, she said.

“From a whole-life feminist perspective, universities and colleges should prioritize creating, maintaining, and expanding comprehensive support systems for pregnant and parenting students — life-affirming solutions that directly address their needs, especially those of low-income women,” Sterlace-Accorsi said.

She also challenged the philosophical premise underlying the garden’s mission.

“Pro-choice feminist arguments that claim ‘abortion is central to women’s liberation’ are anti-feminist, anti-women, and anti-human rights,” she said.

The garden’s promotional materials link to a website, “How to Perform an Abortion,” which describes itself as “a collaborative, research-focused art project.” Its founder, Maureen Connor, is an artist and professor emeritus of Queens College in New York.

Connor’s project aims to demystify and destigmatize “reproductive care,” through projects such as gardens, abortion monuments, workshops, and presentations in public spaces. Other locations for abortion gardens listed on the project website include Barnard College in New York City.

According to the website, the purpose of these gardens is “both as symbol and through function … women need knowledge about existing methods and the means to access them.”

The garden “explores the history of reproductive justice through plants” and “includes herbs that have been used over thousands of years for fertility, contraception and abortion,” according to the website.

The gardens are “comprised of ten plants with abortifacient potential,” the site states.

The website also includes educational materials about historic abortion methods, and states on one page that “no power structure can ultimately stop women from preventing or ending an unwanted pregnancy.”

Evil loons and morons!
 
Condoms have been around since the 1600s. Birth control of various practices was well known in Ancient Egypt before 1850 BC when it was documented in some medical papyrus. And you can bet it goes further back than that.

There are many dead women (and some men due to infections) on the altar of "birth control".

I'm not saying that woman shouldn't use some sense on the subject. So should their partner.
 
They might also want to keep a dime between their knees until they are ready for the responsibility of parenthood.
As was chanted in my high school health class every day, the best form of birth control is abstinence.

And honestly, I don't get it. For the men, it's 20+ years of their future, even if they don't marry. The government will come after them for money. And for the women, it's that plus.

But I don't think like other people, as I regularly get informed.
 
They might also want to keep a dime between their knees until they are ready for the responsibility of parenthood.
Abstinence works. So does masturbation.

I had to think about that one... Google to the rescue.

Google AI: Female masturbation name?

Female masturbation is formally called masturbation, but it has many colloquial names, slang terms, and euphemisms depending on the context. Unlike male slang (such as "jerking off"), English does not have one single universally accepted direct equivalent word, though several terms are commonly used. [1, 2]

Equine opine here: Maker probably would not like masturbation but would understand the choice given Maker's design of sexual excitement.

Maker probably would not like abortion as a direct affront to his command "Be fruitful and multiply" but MIGHT understand given a full consideration to the future of the child, the future of the union, and a non-consideration of self, specifically of the entertainment that intercourse offers.

Life is about choices to best please Maker's will.

Equine opine dismount...

Dobbin
 
Top