HEALTH Missionaries who had contact with Ebola to be quarantined in Charlotte

msswv123

Veteran Member
I know there are several other ebola threads but I think we all need to see this.




Missionaries who had contact with Ebola to be quarantined in Charlotte

BY ELISABETH ARRIERO

earriero@charlotteobserver.comAugust 10, 2014

Read more here: http://www.newsobserver.com/2014/08...d-contact-with.html?sp=/99/102/#storylink=cpy




Missionaries returning from Liberia who have been in direct contact with the Ebola virus but who are not sick are heading to Charlotte and will be quarantined once they arrive, health officials said Sunday.

Dr. Stephen Keener, medical director of the Mecklenburg County Health Department, declined to specify how many missionaries will be quarantined, when they’ll arrive or how they’ll travel from Africa, citing the need for privacy. He also did not specify whether the missionaries are from Charlotte.

“It’s very important to hear and understand that … none of the returning missionaries are ill, none of them have the Ebola virus disease,” Keener said at a press conference. Those affected with Ebola are not infectious until they are symptomatic, health officials have said.

In a statement Sunday, Charlotte Douglas International Airport officials said they are “fully cooperating with state and local officials on the return of volunteers, staff and their families from West African countries currently affected by an Ebola outbreak.”

“The arrival will occur in an undisclosed, nonpublic area in order to ensure the safe return and privacy of the passengers,” the statement said. “The arrival is expected to have no impact (on) airport operations.”

SIM USA, based in Charlotte, is an international mission group that spreads the Gospel and helps the needy in Africa, Asia, the Americas and Europe.

One of its missionaries, Nancy Writebol of Charlotte, became the second American stricken with Ebola while serving in Liberia. She was transferred to Emory University Hospital last Tuesday while her husband, David, remains in Liberia until his health condition is cleared.

Two other missionaries, along with their six children, arrived in Charlotte from Liberia on Aug. 3, SIM said. They remain on the SIM campus in an area that is separate from ongoing operations.

Keener said the missionaries returning differ from those eight who returned last week because last week’s group didn’t have any defined contact with people affected by the Ebola virus.

Those missionaries who returned last week were asked to remain available to go the full 21 days of incubation in the interest of public safety. “They were not put under an official quarantine,” Bruce Johnson, SIM USA’s president, said.

Using extra caution

Quarantine is a tool used to protect the public from the possible spread of a disease. During a quarantine, persons who have been exposed to a communicable disease, but who are not themselves ill, are limited in their movement and contact with others.

“They’re kept at home or in another situation that is controlled so they do not contact other people,” Keener said.

In the case of Ebola, exposure would mean contact with blood, saliva, vomit or other bodily fluids as well as contact with instruments that may be used, such as needles.

Those missionaries who have not been exposed by that definition, however, are “free to travel wherever they want,” Keener said.

“The definition we’re using is a very broad one, just to ensure out of a sense of overcaution that we wouldn’t be letting anything slip through the cracks,” Keener said.

He said because these missionaries are not sick or an immediate threat to public health, the organization is not disclosing any more information about them.

“What’s important, I think, is No. 1, the individuals aren’t sick. So if you’re not sick, then there’s no reason to get on the media and talk about you personally and what you’re doing and not doing because it doesn’t matter,” he said.

He added that the local and state health departments are going above what’s required of them to ensure the public’s safety and “to ensure that these folks are going to remain well and that there’s no opportunity for anybody else to become exposed or sick.”

When pressed for a ballpark figure on how many missionaries are returning from Liberia, Palmer Holt – the president of InChrist Communications who was speaking on behalf of SIM USA – said the organization is not releasing additional information. He said more may be announced in the coming days.

Quarantines used before

Keener said the county has used quarantines in the past, including for SARS in 2003 and the measles in recent years.

The quarantine period depends on the longest known incubation period of the disease in question. For Ebola, that’s 21 days.

“(When the) possibility of them developing the disease has passed, quarantine is lifted,” said Keener, noting that the quarantine for the missionaries began in Liberia with their last contact with the Ebola virus.

Should one of the patients start showing symptoms of the virus, health officials plan to consult with experts to determine whether further evaluation is needed, said Keener.

He added that symptoms of the virus can mimic what one would see in the flu or other types of viral diseases.

In the event that someone shows signs of Ebola, “all the necessary precautions will be taken at (a) hospital. The hospital will use the normal isolation procedures to ensure the safety of the staff and public.”

Keener did not specify the hospital. In late July, Carolinas Medical Center emergency room staffers had an Ebola scare when they realized one of their patients had recently traveled in Africa.

In response, the hospital took precautions by roping off a portion of the ER and placing the patient in isolation for about seven hours. Soon after, doctors and public health officials ruled out the risk of Ebola.

In the wake of that incident, Dr. Katie Passaretti, medical director for infection prevention at Carolinas Medical Center, said medical personnel held meetings to go over emergency protocols. “We were prepared before that, but that definitely kicked things up even higher,” she said. “We are ready if it happens.”
 

pirate9933

Veteran Member
“It’s very important to hear and understand that … none of the returning missionaries are ill, none of them have the Ebola virus disease,” Keener said at a press conference. Those affected with Ebola are not infectious until they are symptomatic, health officials have said.

“The arrival will occur in an undisclosed, nonpublic area in order to ensure the safe return and privacy of the passengers,” the statement said. “The arrival is expected to have no impact (on) airport operations.”

One of its missionaries, Nancy Writebol of Charlotte, became the second American stricken with Ebola while serving in Liberia. She was transferred to Emory University Hospital last Tuesday while her husband, David, remains in Liberia until his health condition is cleared.

Two other missionaries, along with their six children, arrived in Charlotte from Liberia on Aug. 3, SIM said. They remain on the SIM campus in an area that is separate from ongoing operations.

Keener said the missionaries returning differ from those eight who returned last week because last week’s group didn’t have any defined contact with people affected by the Ebola virus.

Those missionaries who returned last week were asked to remain available to go the full 21 days of incubation in the interest of public safety. “They were not put under an official quarantine,” Bruce Johnson, SIM USA’s president, said.

Using extra caution

Quarantine is a tool used to protect the public from the possible spread of a disease. During a quarantine, persons who have been exposed to a communicable disease, but who are not themselves ill, are limited in their movement and contact with others.

“They’re kept at home or in another situation that is controlled so they do not contact other people,” Keener said.

In the case of Ebola, exposure would mean contact with blood, saliva, vomit or other bodily fluids as well as contact with instruments that may be used, such as needles.

Those missionaries who have not been exposed by that definition, however, are “free to travel wherever they want,” Keener said.

There are so many contradictions just in this short story and even the small excerpt that I copied here.
The laissez faire attitude just blows me away.
Do you really have to have blood oozing from every orifice to say "hum, I think THAT person MAY have a problem".

And these people went there with their 6 children.
 

Hfcomms

EN66iq
The laissez faire attitude just blows me away.


God help us if Ebola really gets a toehold in this country because that attitude will get a lot of people killed. This is a level IV pathogen and the attitude is one of indifference and trust in what the CDC is saying like it's the holy grail. Never mind it's been demonstrated that Ebola can transmit cross species even with no direct contact and we know of at least two of our own health care professionals following all the recommended protocols still caught Ebola. And then listening to the CDC podcast they don't even say that workers caring for Ebola patients have to wear N95 or better respirators. They said that face shields were adequate unless aerosol generating procedures such as intubation were used. Just incredible.
 

Adino

paradigm shaper
every time i see them cite 'privacy' for the exposed i wonder how long that will really matter
 

Adino

paradigm shaper
God help us if Ebola really gets a toehold in this country because that attitude will get a lot of people killed. This is a level IV pathogen and the attitude is one of indifference and trust in what the CDC is saying like it's the holy grail. Never mind it's been demonstrated that Ebola can transmit cross species even with no direct contact and we know of at least two of our own health care professionals following all the recommended protocols still caught Ebola. And then listening to the CDC podcast they don't even say that workers caring for Ebola patients have to wear N95 or better respirators. They said that face shields were adequate unless aerosol generating procedures such as intubation were used. Just incredible.

oh we can trust the cdc

just look what a great job they are doing from preventing incurable tb from walking over the mexican border

they got it covered
 

straightstreet

Life is better in flip flops
Is there any way to know if any ebola patients are being treated at Vanderbilt in Nashville? My DM has been newly diagnosed with stage IV lung cancer and has asked for a referral to this hospital from our local hospital. I will be the one taking her. I've not been on here enough in the last 2 weeks to keep up with all the ebola info to know where to look or if it's possible to even know.
 

summerthyme

Administrator
_______________
Straightstreet... at this point, the only Ebola cases they are admitting to in the US (and I really *don't* believe you could keep it quiet for long) are the two missionary health workers- Dr Brantly and Nancy Whitebol, who are both in Emery University hospital in Atlanta.

Summerthyme
 
There are so many contradictions just in this short story and even the small excerpt that I copied here.
The laissez faire attitude just blows me away.
Do you really have to have blood oozing from every orifice to say "hum, I think THAT person MAY have a problem".

And these people went there with their 6 children.

The lead sentence in that article states: "Missionaries returning from Liberia who have been in direct contact with the Ebola virus but who are not sick are heading to Charlotte and will be quarantined once they arrive, health officials said Sunday."
 

rafter

Since 1999
God help us if Ebola really gets a toehold in this country because that attitude will get a lot of people killed. This is a level IV pathogen and the attitude is one of indifference and trust in what the CDC is saying like it's the holy grail. Never mind it's been demonstrated that Ebola can transmit cross species even with no direct contact and we know of at least two of our own health care professionals following all the recommended protocols still caught Ebola. And then listening to the CDC podcast they don't even say that workers caring for Ebola patients have to wear N95 or better respirators. They said that face shields were adequate unless aerosol generating procedures such as intubation were used. Just incredible.


We shouldn't be surprised by any of this. With the government it has always been "avoid panic at all costs".
 

Melodi

Disaster Cat
They can test people, test takes 24 to 48 hours - if they are negative to exposure they are safe to travel - it is still a good idea to transport them on a private plan (with all proper procedures done as was done before) and put them in quarantine as a precaution; because it is unlikely but possible if they had a very recently exposure they might become ill later. But if they test them so the results come back right before flying, it is most likely they are safe to fly and as long as kept separated from the general population and all involved wear precautions they should be fine.

Again, I worry a lot less about rescue and evacuation missions like this one than I do the Mr. Bigshot, the returning family member from vacation, the conference delegate or the legal/illegal immigrant who just breezes in through the airport feeling fine; only to become deathly ill five to ten days later after potentially infecting dozens (who by then many have infected hundreds).
 
Declassified picture of a young MK-ULTRA subject, 1961.

This entire 'Issue' brings to mind the very real experiments that were carried out not so long ago.



:dstrs::dstrs::dstrs:
 

Attachments

  • MKULTRA.jpg
    MKULTRA.jpg
    38.6 KB · Views: 142
Last edited:

Satanta

Stone Cold Crazy
_______________
I think they should be housed in D.C. and given bus passes. Obama can offer them Hope ad Change and bore the virus to death with his long-winded, self-centered speeches and Moo can treat them with her special diets.
 

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
oh we can trust the cdc

just look what a great job they are doing from preventing incurable tb from walking over the mexican border

they got it covered


Sunday's headline in the AJC (Atlanta Journal Constitution) was about the significant breakout of TB in the Atlanta area----

and btw the Governor of the state recently complained about how many "children" were being sent HERE from the border crisis for "resettlement" without his having been told---I think it was a couple thousand...
 

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city


AND THEN THERE IS THIS TIDBIT.....
***Notice all the 'Classifieds' as John Haller reads the bill***




Even the person reading this, at one point, says "Jesus!" in response to HIS seeing what we all can NOT see or hear, due to its being "classified"---but apparently the bill is about the special funding to be appropriated for DHS in case of an outbreak of some type of disease agent---

AND ONE PROVISION OF THE LEGISLATION IS TO ESTABLISH "A NEW BILL OF RIGHTS' "TO BE DRAFTED AND APPROVED BY (CLASSIFIED)"! (at 1:38 in)

Can anyone tell me if this bill was PASSED???!!???
 
Even the person reading this, at one point, says "Jesus!" in response to HIS seeing what we all can NOT see or hear, due to its being "classified"---but apparently the bill is about the special funding to be appropriated for DHS in case of an outbreak of some type of disease agent---

AND ONE PROVISION OF THE LEGISLATION IS TO ESTABLISH "A NEW BILL OF RIGHTS' "TO BE DRAFTED AND APPROVED BY (CLASSIFIED)"! (at 1:38 in)

Can anyone tell me if this bill was PASSED???!!???

Yes CM a certain degree of 'suspect' as Haller seems to be stuttered and aghast at what is before His eyes. Still searching for the bill.I'll have to go to the .gov sight to find the bill.
 

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
Transcript of above: (I don't think this is thread drift, as it sound VERY applicable to what COULD be enacted if Ebola begins to take hold here)---

"Congress shall now vote for approval of HR 8791, The Homeland Terrorism Preparedness Bill.

Said bill requests emergency response funding, up to and including
--I'm sorry, this section is classified---dollars to prepare for national-level terrorist attack and / or attack from --classified.

Funding for first responder personnel and vehicles would be doubled if said attack leads to more than 80% of national population being affected by --classified.

This funding shall commence in conjunction with the first attack on--classified-- or the first large-scale outbreak of -- classified-- dependent upon on which comes first.

Civilian and military units shall be trained in containment and combat of --classified--, including irradiated --classified--, with possibility of --classified--airborne--classified, flesh-eating--classified--, and / or all of the above, in such event as --classified-- spewing --classified-- escape or otherwise become uncontrollable.

Air force units may also be directed to combat said --classified-- due to their enormous size and otherworldly strengths.

Should event occur in urban areas
JESUS!---uh, that's classified--far surpassing our darkest nightmares. Should casualties exceed --classified--, body disposal actions shall be halted and associated resources shall be reallocated through --classified--underground, --classified--protected birthing centers.

A new Bill of Rights shall be drafted and approved by --classified--.

Having now reviewed the bill, I ask to please now cast your votes.



If I hadn't seen this with my own eyes and heard it with my own ears, I'd have thought I was reading some WILD conspiracy site or watching a movie.


HAS THIS BILL BEEN PASSED?????????????????????????/
 

psychgirl

Has No Life - Lives on TB
I doubt if it's been passed, due to the "shall be" type of language used. When did this take place, anyway?? It should send shivers down our spines just by the horrified tone and words used :(
 

msswv123

Veteran Member
Transcript of above: (I don't think this is thread drift, as it sound VERY applicable to what COULD be enacted if Ebola begins to take hold here)---

"Congress shall now vote for approval of HR 8791, The Homeland Terrorism Preparedness Bill.

Said bill requests emergency response funding, up to and including
--I'm sorry, this section is classified---dollars to prepare for national-level terrorist attack and / or attack from --classified.

Funding for first responder personnel and vehicles would be doubled if said attack leads to more than 80% of national population being affected by --classified.

This funding shall commence in conjunction with the first attack on--classified-- or the first large-scale outbreak of -- classified-- dependent upon on which comes first.

Civilian and military units shall be trained in containment and combat of --classified--, including irradiated --classified--, with possibility of --classified--airborne--classified, flesh-eating--classified--, and / or all of the above, in such event as --classified-- spewing --classified-- escape or otherwise become uncontrollable.

Air force units may also be directed to combat said --classified-- due to their enormous size and otherworldly strengths.

Should event occur in urban areas
JESUS!---uh, that's classified--far surpassing our darkest nightmares. Should casualties exceed --classified--, body disposal actions shall be halted and associated resources shall be reallocated through --classified--underground, --classified--protected birthing centers.

A new Bill of Rights shall be drafted and approved by --classified--.

Having now reviewed the bill, I ask to please now cast your votes.



If I hadn't seen this with my own eyes and heard it with my own ears, I'd have thought I was reading some WILD conspiracy site or watching a movie.


HAS THIS BILL BEEN PASSED?????????????????????????/



I think this was a satire piece from the onion:

The Onion produced a very convincing (on first blush) fake video
on what is purported to be HR-8791, the Homeland Terrorism
Preparedness Bill. Not only is there not a HR-8791, there is not a
Congressman John Haller. Nor is the logo on the lower right a
C-SPAN logo. Furthermore, Pennsylvania's 12th District is held by
John P. Murtha. Murtha's held that seat since 1971.

http://www.jonchristianryter.com/Video/090704b.html


If you notice that's not the C span logo.
 

Steve308

Contributing Member
Countrymouse;5312535 Air force units may also be directed to combat said [COLOR="red" said:
--classified--[/COLOR] due to their enormous size and otherworldly strengths.

Am I the only person that though "Godzilla" when they read this? :eek:

Steve308
 

msswv123

Veteran Member
WE probably need to check our states provisions on this:

The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act addresses a number of issues likely to arise
during a public health emergency and offers guidelines for states with respect to what powers
may be necessary during such an emergency. With respect to vaccinations, the Model Act
includes provisions similar to the current laws discussed above. Under the Model Act, during a
public health emergency, the appropriate public health authority would be authorized to
“vaccinate persons as protection against infectious disease and to prevent the spread of
contagious or possibly contagious disease.”65 The Model Act requires that the vaccine be
administered by a qualified person authorized by the public health authority, and that the vaccine
“not be such as is reasonably likely to lead to serious harm to the affected individual.”66 The
Model Act recognizes that individuals may be unable or unwilling to undergo vaccination “for
reasons of health, religion, or conscience,” and provides that such individuals may be subject to
quarantine to prevent the spread of a contagious or possibly contagious disease.67 State adoption
of the Model Act’s provisions has varied.68

This was updated may 2014

http://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RS21414.pdf






CDC's Model State Emergency Health Powers Act Goes Too Far

St. Paul, Minnesota - To combat bioterrorism, federal health officials have proposed that state legislators give state health officials new powers over citizens. The powers proposed in the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act would be broad and sweeping, forcing citizens to submit to physical examinations, tests, quarantine and vaccinations against their will.

Some states, including Minnesota, are already considering enactment in 2002.

Citizens' Council on Health Care (CCHC) is concerned that the proposal would provide intrusive authority for purposes far beyond bioterrorism. According to press accounts, the writing of the Act began well before September 11th - the day of the terrorist attack.

"Unfortunately, the terrorist attack and the public's new awareness of bioterrorism have given public health officials new ammunition to advance their pet projects of health care surveillance and mandatory vaccination," says Twila Brase, president of CCHC.

Of particular concern in the Act are the following provisions:

Broad Definitions

A "public health emergency" can be declared not only for bioterrorism attacks, but also for epidemics, pandemic disease or natural disasters.
The terms "epidemic disease", "pandemic disease" and "natural disaster" are not defined, leaving public health officials ample room for their own interpretation.
There are no limits on the number or types of tests that can be performed on individuals, or on the bodily specimens that can be collected. DNA and genetic testing are not excluded.
Loss of Civil Rights

Although due process is allowed, the Act permits state officials to identify and train personnel to serve as "emergency judges" to deal with citizen appeals of forced quarantine and isolation. Such training may be biased.
Citizens are required to submit to medical examinations, vaccinations, and quarantine against their will if a public health emergency is declared.
Public health officials are given authority to "collect specimens and perform tests on any person" even if they are healthy with no history of exposure to disease.
Health care professionals who refuse to provide forced medical examinations or vaccinations can be charged with a misdemeanor.
Citizens who refuse to comply can be detained and charged with a misdemeanor.
Police officers will be placed under the authority of health department officials.
Medical Privacy Violations

Regular ongoing reporting of individual patients and purchase of medication is required. Health care professionals, health care facilities, coroners, medical examiners and pharmacists must provide information (name, date of birth, sex, race, address, name of health care provider) to the state health department if there is the "potential" for bioterrorism, epidemic or pandemic disease. No patient consent is required.
Broad access to patient medical records is permitted without patient consent for research related to epidemics and infectious disease, including to unnamed "appropriate federal agencies or authorities." There are no requirements that the individually- identifiable data will be deleted, or not used or shared for other purposes, once the public health emergency order is terminated.
State Control

Public health officials can assume control of hospital and clinic operations.
State control of communication facilities, food distribution, fuel supply, and real estate is authorized.
State rationing of food, fuel, clothing, alcohol, firearms, and other commodities is authorized.
The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act, prepared for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, was written by Lawrence O. Gostin, J.D., Professor and Director of the Center for Law and the Public's Health at Georgetown University Law Center. It is meant to provide a template for state legislation. A draft version of the Act was released October 23, 2001.

http://www.cchfreedom.org/cchf.php/223#.U-kHpPldW-4
 

rummer

Veteran Member
oh we can trust the cdc

just look what a great job they are doing from preventing incurable tb from walking over the mexican border

they got it covered

Absolutely, if the Ebola don't get you the incurable TB will.
 

msswv123

Veteran Member
At the completion of the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (MSEHPA) on December 21, 2001, its drafters at the Centers for Law and the Public’s Health:
A Collaborative at Georgetown and John Hopkins Universities initially tracked state legislative bills, statutes and regulations relating to the subject matter of the Act
through July 15, 2006.

In an effort to update the Centers’ original legal tracking of MSEHPA provisions, this Table provides information regarding statutory or regulatory provisions among
all 50 states and the District of Columbia that replicate, reflect or closely relate to several of its key provisions as of August 1, 2011. For each of the major sections
of MSEHPA listed in the columns below, citations and active hyperlinks (where available) to related state statutes/ regulations/bills are provided.

States for which no relevant results were located in any of the selected sections of MSEHPA are shaded. The fact that no results are noted for any state should not be used to evaluate that state’s level of emergency legal preparedness. The numbers of states whose laws relate to each of the specific provisions of MSEHPA are tallied in
the final row. Corresponding endnotes provide specific information to help clarify results.


Disclaimer: Data for this Table was assembled through online searches of each state’s statutes and regulations based on the language and purposes of
MSEHPA’s specific provisions. In most cases, these results have not been independently evaluated by legal counsel in each state, nor are they meant to suggest
that each reported state’s laws are based entirely on MSEHPA. Additional model laws, including the Turning Point Model State Public Health Act and the Uniform
Emergency Volunteer Health Practitioners Act, reflect provisions of MSEHPA and may be a source of guidance for corresponding state laws. In some cases,
enactment or promulgation of state laws reported in this Table may precede the completion of MSEHPA or other model acts. Finally, please note that the results of
this Table should not be used to evaluate or “score” any state regarding its level of emergency legal preparedness.


Chart with links for states:

https://www.networkforphl.org/_asset/80p3y7/MSEHPA-States-Table-022812.pdf
 

msswv123

Veteran Member
NC: One of the references from the link above:

§ 130A-145. Quarantine and isolation authority.

(a) The State Health Director and a local health director are empowered to exercise
quarantine and isolation authority. Quarantine and isolation authority shall be exercised only
when and so long as the public health is endangered, all other reasonable means for correcting
the problem have been exhausted, and no less restrictive alternative exists.

(b) No person other than a person authorized by the State Health Director or local
health director shall enter quarantine or isolation premises. Nothing in this subsection shall be
construed to restrict the access of authorized health care, law enforcement, or emergency
medical services personnel to quarantine or isolation premises as necessary in conducting their
duties.
(c) Before applying quarantine or isolation authority to livestock or poultry for the
purpose of preventing the direct or indirect conveyance of an infectious agent to persons, the
State Health Director or a local health director shall consult with the State Veterinarian in the
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.


(d) When quarantine or isolation limits the freedom of movement of a person or animal
or of access to a person or animal whose freedom of movement is limited, the period of limited
freedom of movement or access shall not exceed 30 calendar days. Any person substantially
affected by that limitation may institute in superior court in Wake County or in the county in
which the limitation is imposed an action to review that limitation. The official who exercises
the quarantine or isolation authority shall give the persons known by the official to be
substantially affected by the limitation reasonable notice under the circumstances of the right to
institute an action to review the limitation.

If a person or a person's representative requests a
hearing, the hearing shall be held within 72 hours of the filing of that request, excluding
Saturdays and Sundays. The person substantially affected by that limitation is entitled to be
represented by counsel of the person's own choice or if the person is indigent, the person shall
be represented by counsel appointed in accordance with Article 36 of Chapter 7A of the
General Statutes and the rules adopted by the Office of Indigent Defense Services. The court
shall reduce or terminate the limitation unless it determines, by the preponderance of the
evidence, that the limitation is reasonably necessary to prevent or limit the conveyance of a
communicable disease or condition to others.

If the State Health Director or the local health director determines that a 30-calendar-day
limitation on freedom of movement or access is not adequate to protect the public health, the
State Health Director or local health director must institute in superior court in the county in
which the limitation is imposed an action to obtain an order extending the period of limitation
of freedom of movement or access. If the person substantially affected by the limitation has
already instituted an action in superior court in Wake County, the State Health Director must
institute the action in superior court in Wake County or as a counterclaim in the pending case.


Except as provided below for persons with tuberculosis, the court shall continue the limitation
for a period not to exceed 30 days if it determines, by the preponderance of the evidence, that
the limitation is reasonably necessary to prevent or limit the conveyance of a communicable
disease or condition to others. The court order shall specify the period of time the limitation is
to be continued and shall provide for automatic termination of the order upon written
determination by the State Health Director or local health director that the quarantine or
isolation is no longer necessary to protect the public health. In addition, where the petitioner
can prove by a preponderance of the evidence that quarantine or isolation was not or is no
longer needed for protection of the public health, the person quarantined or isolated may move
the trial court to reconsider its order extending quarantine or isolation before the time for the
order otherwise expires and may seek immediate or expedited termination of the order. Before
the expiration of an order issued under this section, the State Health Director or local health
director may move to continue the order for additional periods not to exceed 30 days each.

If the person whose freedom of movement has been limited has tuberculosis, the court shall
continue the limitation for a period not to exceed one calendar year if it determines, by a
preponderance of the evidence, that the limitation is reasonably necessary to prevent or limit
the conveyance of tuberculosis to others.

The court order shall specify the period of time the
limitation is to be continued and shall provide for automatic termination of the order upon
written determination by the State Health Director or local health director that the quarantine or
isolation is no longer necessary to protect the public health. In addition, where the petitioner
can prove by a preponderance of the evidence that quarantine or isolation was not or is no
longer needed for protection of the public health, the person quarantined or isolated may move
the trial court to reconsider its order extending quarantine or isolation before the time for the
order otherwise expires and may seek immediate or expedited termination of the order. Before
the expiration of an order limiting the freedom of movement of a person with tuberculosis, the
State Health Director or local health director may move to continue the order for additional
periods not to exceed one calendar year each. (1957, c. 1357, s. 1; 1983, c. 891, s. 2; 1987, c.
782, s. 15; 2002-179, s. 5; 2004-80, s. 2.)


http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/PDF/BySection/Chapter_130A/GS_130A-145.pdf
 

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
Transcript of above: (I don't think this is thread drift, as it sound VERY applicable to what COULD be enacted if Ebola begins to take hold here)---

"Congress shall now vote for approval of HR 8791, The Homeland Terrorism Preparedness Bill.

Said bill requests emergency response funding, up to and including
--I'm sorry, this section is classified---dollars to prepare for national-level terrorist attack and / or attack from --classified.

Funding for first responder personnel and vehicles would be doubled if said attack leads to more than 80% of national population being affected by --classified.

This funding shall commence in conjunction with the first attack on--classified-- or the first large-scale outbreak of -- classified-- dependent upon on which comes first.

Civilian and military units shall be trained in containment and combat of --classified--, including irradiated --classified--, with possibility of --classified--airborne--classified, flesh-eating--classified--, and / or all of the above, in such event as --classified-- spewing --classified-- escape or otherwise become uncontrollable.

Air force units may also be directed to combat said --classified-- due to their enormous size and otherworldly strengths.

Should event occur in urban areas
JESUS!---uh, that's classified--far surpassing our darkest nightmares. Should casualties exceed --classified--, body disposal actions shall be halted and associated resources shall be reallocated through --classified--underground, --classified--protected birthing centers.

A new Bill of Rights shall be drafted and approved by --classified--.

Having now reviewed the bill, I ask to please now cast your votes.



If I hadn't seen this with my own eyes and heard it with my own ears, I'd have thought I was reading some WILD conspiracy site or watching a movie.


HAS THIS BILL BEEN PASSED?????????????????????????/

Okay, thankfully this IS a satire---3 years old---here's Snopes' take on it:

Of course, there was no Rep. John Haller of Pennsylvania in the U.S. Congress back in 2007 (that state's 12th Congressional District was represented by John Murtha from 1974 until his death in 2010), nor was any legislation identified as H.R. 8791 or the "Homeland Terrorism Preparedness Bill" introduced to that body. The video clip was a spoof from the satirical publication The Onion (whose logo can be seen in the bottom right-hand corner, replacing the 'C' of C-SPAN), riffing on a number of topical subjects such as concerns over the secrecy surrounding terrorism-related legislation (such as the Patriot Act) enacted after the 9/11 attacks, criticisms of Congress for passing bills that members supposedly had not fully read or understood, and a current pop culture fascination with apocalyptic zombie scenarios.

Last updated: 3 July 2014
Read more at http://www.snopes.com/politics/satire/hr8791.asp#eTsOoP9hPiAl2qLi.99



sorry, folks--didn't know the "Onion's" work extended to VIDEOS also--and since we don't have cable, I wouldn't know one "C-span" logo from another, since we don't HAVE C-span....
 

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
NC: One of the references from the link above:

§ 130A-145. Quarantine and isolation authority.

(a) The State Health Director and a local health director are empowered to exercise
quarantine and isolation authority. Quarantine and isolation authority shall be exercised only
when and so long as the public health is endangered, all other reasonable means for correcting
the problem have been exhausted, and no less restrictive alternative exists.

(b) No person other than a person authorized by the State Health Director or local
health director shall enter quarantine or isolation premises. Nothing in this subsection shall be
construed to restrict the access of authorized health care, law enforcement, or emergency
medical services personnel to quarantine or isolation premises as necessary in conducting their
duties.
(c) Before applying quarantine or isolation authority to livestock or poultry for the
purpose of preventing the direct or indirect conveyance of an infectious agent to persons, the
State Health Director or a local health director shall consult with the State Veterinarian in the
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.


(d) When quarantine or isolation limits the freedom of movement of a person or animal
or of access to a person or animal whose freedom of movement is limited, the period of limited
freedom of movement or access shall not exceed 30 calendar days. Any person substantially
affected by that limitation may institute in superior court in Wake County or in the county in
which the limitation is imposed an action to review that limitation. The official who exercises
the quarantine or isolation authority shall give the persons known by the official to be
substantially affected by the limitation reasonable notice under the circumstances of the right to
institute an action to review the limitation.

If a person or a person's representative requests a
hearing, the hearing shall be held within 72 hours of the filing of that request, excluding
Saturdays and Sundays. The person substantially affected by that limitation is entitled to be
represented by counsel of the person's own choice or if the person is indigent, the person shall
be represented by counsel appointed in accordance with Article 36 of Chapter 7A of the
General Statutes and the rules adopted by the Office of Indigent Defense Services. The court
shall reduce or terminate the limitation unless it determines, by the preponderance of the
evidence, that the limitation is reasonably necessary to prevent or limit the conveyance of a
communicable disease or condition to others.

If the State Health Director or the local health director determines that a 30-calendar-day
limitation on freedom of movement or access is not adequate to protect the public health, the
State Health Director or local health director must institute in superior court in the county in
which the limitation is imposed an action to obtain an order extending the period of limitation
of freedom of movement or access. If the person substantially affected by the limitation has
already instituted an action in superior court in Wake County, the State Health Director must
institute the action in superior court in Wake County or as a counterclaim in the pending case.


Except as provided below for persons with tuberculosis, the court shall continue the limitation
for a period not to exceed 30 days if it determines, by the preponderance of the evidence, that
the limitation is reasonably necessary to prevent or limit the conveyance of a communicable
disease or condition to others. The court order shall specify the period of time the limitation is
to be continued and shall provide for automatic termination of the order upon written
determination by the State Health Director or local health director that the quarantine or
isolation is no longer necessary to protect the public health. In addition, where the petitioner
can prove by a preponderance of the evidence that quarantine or isolation was not or is no
longer needed for protection of the public health, the person quarantined or isolated may move
the trial court to reconsider its order extending quarantine or isolation before the time for the
order otherwise expires and may seek immediate or expedited termination of the order. Before
the expiration of an order issued under this section, the State Health Director or local health
director may move to continue the order for additional periods not to exceed 30 days each.

If the person whose freedom of movement has been limited has tuberculosis, the court shall
continue the limitation for a period not to exceed one calendar year if it determines, by a
preponderance of the evidence, that the limitation is reasonably necessary to prevent or limit
the conveyance of tuberculosis to others.

The court order shall specify the period of time the
limitation is to be continued and shall provide for automatic termination of the order upon
written determination by the State Health Director or local health director that the quarantine or
isolation is no longer necessary to protect the public health. In addition, where the petitioner
can prove by a preponderance of the evidence that quarantine or isolation was not or is no
longer needed for protection of the public health, the person quarantined or isolated may move
the trial court to reconsider its order extending quarantine or isolation before the time for the
order otherwise expires and may seek immediate or expedited termination of the order. Before
the expiration of an order limiting the freedom of movement of a person with tuberculosis, the
State Health Director or local health director may move to continue the order for additional
periods not to exceed one calendar year each. (1957, c. 1357, s. 1; 1983, c. 891, s. 2; 1987, c.
782, s. 15; 2002-179, s. 5; 2004-80, s. 2.)


http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/PDF/BySection/Chapter_130A/GS_130A-145.pdf

Thank you for some information about actual Laws---this plus the recent EO concerning "respiratory" illnesses (TB, anyone?) are MOST interesting...
 

msswv123

Veteran Member
SIM officials said that the three missionaries, including David Writebol, are being quarantined in Charlotte at an RV park. David Writebol is the husband of Ebola patient Nancy Writebol who is being treated at an Atlanta hospital.
The three, along with eight others from last week, are quarantined on the SIM campus in a 60-acre RV park in the back of the property. There are five RVs with space to walk around. http://bit.ly/1uHnnwm



By Alexa Ashwell

CHARLOTTE — Three SIM missionaries serving in Liberia during the recent Ebola outbreak returned Sunday night to Charlotte.

The three included David Writebol, the husband of Charlotte missionary Nancy Writebol who is being treated for Ebola in Atlanta. The two others are SIM doctors who were treating Ebola patients at medical facilities in Liberia.

They arrived by private charter around 10:16 p.m. into Charlotte-Douglas International airport.

SIM said the three have not shown signs or symptoms of Ebola and appear to be healthy. They will remain under a 21-day quarantine that started in Liberia.
Each was checked and cleared medically before boarding the flight from Liberia to the U.S.

Each was also checked and found healthy by Mecklenburg County Public Health communicable disease specialists upon arrival in Charlotte.

Dr. Stephen Keener, Mecklenburg County medical director, said the quarantine is a preventative measure, and at this time public health officials feel there is no cause for concern.

The three are quarantined on the SIM campus in a 60-acre RV park in the back of the property. There are five RVs with space to walk around. Officials said the RVS are comfortable and gives them privacy.

“Quarantine is a public health measure to protect the public that requires healthy people who were exposed to a disease to be prevented from contact with others until it is certain that they are not infected,” Keener said in a press release Sunday.

The three SIM missionaries will be staying in a private section of SIM USA’s 90-acre campus in Charlotte until they have been released from quarantine.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Ebola currently poses no substantial risk to the U.S. general population.

http://www.wsoctv.com/news/news/local/charlotte-bound-missionaries-west-africa-quarantin/ngytM/
 
I think this was a satire piece from the onion:

The Onion produced a very convincing (on first blush) fake video
on what is purported to be HR-8791, the Homeland Terrorism
Preparedness Bill. Not only is there not a HR-8791, there is not a
Congressman John Haller. Nor is the logo on the lower right a
C-SPAN logo. Furthermore, Pennsylvania's 12th District is held by
John P. Murtha. Murtha's held that seat since 1971.

http://www.jonchristianryter.com/Video/090704b.html


If you notice that's not the C span logo.
Good eye...Had Me searching for 2 hours. ;)

http://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RS21414.pdf >>>Thanks X10
 
SIM officials said that the three missionaries, including David Writebol, are being quarantined in Charlotte at an RV park. David Writebol is the husband of Ebola patient Nancy Writebol who is being treated at an Atlanta hospital.
The three, along with eight others from last week, are quarantined on the SIM campus in a 60-acre RV park in the back of the property. There are five RVs with space to walk around. http://bit.ly/1uHnnwm



By Alexa Ashwell

CHARLOTTE — Three SIM missionaries serving in Liberia during the recent Ebola outbreak returned Sunday night to Charlotte.

The three included David Writebol, the husband of Charlotte missionary Nancy Writebol who is being treated for Ebola in Atlanta. The two others are SIM doctors who were treating Ebola patients at medical facilities in Liberia.

They arrived by private charter around 10:16 p.m. into Charlotte-Douglas International airport.

SIM said the three have not shown signs or symptoms of Ebola and appear to be healthy. They will remain under a 21-day quarantine that started in Liberia.
Each was checked and cleared medically before boarding the flight from Liberia to the U.S.

Each was also checked and found healthy by Mecklenburg County Public Health communicable disease specialists upon arrival in Charlotte.

Dr. Stephen Keener, Mecklenburg County medical director, said the quarantine is a preventative measure, and at this time public health officials feel there is no cause for concern.

The three are quarantined on the SIM campus in a 60-acre RV park in the back of the property. There are five RVs with space to walk around. Officials said the RVS are comfortable and gives them privacy.

“Quarantine is a public health measure to protect the public that requires healthy people who were exposed to a disease to be prevented from contact with others until it is certain that they are not infected,” Keener said in a press release Sunday.

The three SIM missionaries will be staying in a private section of SIM USA’s 90-acre campus in Charlotte until they have been released from quarantine.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Ebola currently poses no substantial risk to the U.S. general population.

http://www.wsoctv.com/news/news/local/charlotte-bound-missionaries-west-africa-quarantin/ngytM/

This was part of the property used by the 'Jim Baker' Ministries (Heritage USA/PTL) Compound I believe before it was auctioned off to a housing development and a Private Investment firm....https://www.google.com/maps/@35.098...!1e1!3m2!1sunwJOucWwsltDre797pR7Q!2e0!6m1!1e1
 
Last edited:
EBOLA FDA-Approved Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators Inhibit Ebola Virus Infection

Ebola viruses remain a substantial threat to both civilian and military populations as bioweapons, during sporadic outbreaks, and from the possibility of accidental importation from endemic regions by infected individuals. Currently, no approved therapeutics exist to treat or prevent infection by Ebola viruses. Therefore, we performed an in vitro screen of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)– and ex–US-approved drugs and selected molecular probes to identify drugs with antiviral activity against the type species Zaire ebolavirus (EBOV). From this screen, we identified a set of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), including clomiphene and toremifene, which act as potent inhibitors of EBOV infection. Anti-EBOV activity was confirmed for both of these SERMs in an in vivo mouse infection model. This anti-EBOV activity occurred even in the absence of detectable estrogen receptor expression, and both SERMs inhibited virus entry after internalization, suggesting that clomiphene and toremifene are not working through classical pathways associated with the estrogen receptor. Instead, the response appeared to be an off-target effect where the compounds interfere with a step late in viral entry and likely affect the triggering of fusion. These data support the screening of readily available approved drugs to identify therapeutics for the Ebola viruses and other infectious diseases. The SERM compounds described in this report are an immediately actionable class of approved drugs that can be repurposed for treatment of filovirus infections.

Filoviruses (Ebola virus and Marburg virus) are responsible for some of the most lethal viral hemorrhagic fevers. The genus Ebolavirus includes five species of Ebola virus with case fatality rates up to 90%, whereas the single Marburg virus has different isolates with differing mortality rates (20 to 90%). Natural outbreaks of filoviruses in humans have been reported in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Republic of the Congo, Sudan, Uganda, Angola, and Gabon. Filovirus illness is characterized by fever, myalgia, headache, and gastrointestinal symptoms, and patients may also develop a maculopapular rash (1). Fatal outcomes correlate with increased viremia, convulsions, and disseminated intravascular coagulation (1). The filoviruses are grave viral threats that continue to infect humans as well as nonhuman primates (NHPs) (2). There is a great concern about the potential for accidental importation from endemic regions by infected humans before the onset or diagnosis of the disease, and that filoviruses may be used as a biological weapon (3).

Although effective drugs have been found to treat several other viral diseases, there are currently no approved therapeutics (small molecule or biologic) to prevent or treat filovirus infections. Therefore, it is important to develop therapeutics that can be used for prophylaxis and as antiviral agents against filovirus infection.

A high-throughput assay for Zaire ebolavirus (EBOV) has been developed using the recombinant EBOV engineered to express the enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) established by Towner et al. (4). The insertion of the eGFP gene into the EBOV genome allows for the detection of infected cells by flow cytometry, fluorimetry, fluorescence microscopy, and high-content imaging. The eGFP-expressing EBOV retains the infection and replication characteristics of the parent virus in vitro (4). The eGFP-EBOV offers great utility for screening because this virus targets the complete virus life cycle and offers a higher throughput of drug screening than traditional plaque assays and yield reduction assays. Such a cell-based assay can be used to identify inhibitors that target both viral and host pathways relevant to viral replication, and the activity of “hit” compounds can be confirmed using native isotypes. The identification of active compounds from this type of screen also may be helpful in identifying the critical pathways or targets that are essential for viral replication.

We conducted a cell-based screen of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)– and ex–US-approved drugs and molecular probes to identify inhibitors of Ebola viruses using the eGFP-EBOV assay. This screen identified many approved drugs and probes with previously undocumented anti-EBOV activity, including the selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) clomiphene and toremifene. SERM activity involves binding of the ligand SERM to the estrogen receptor (ER), a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily, causing conformational changes that facilitate interactions with coactivator or corepressor proteins and subsequently initiate or suppress transcription of target genes. SERM activity is intrinsic to each ER ligand, which accomplishes its profile by specific interactions in the target cell, leading to tissue-selective actions [reviewed in (5) and (6)]. Clomiphene (brand names Clomid and Serophene) is used to treat female infertility due to anovulation. Toremifene (brand name Fareston) is approved for the treatment of advanced metastatic breast cancer.

INTRODUCTON
We used clomiphene and toremifene to further characterize the mechanism by which these drugs affected Ebola virus infection. We confirmed the anti-EBOV activity of clomiphene and toremifene in mouse infection models. We demonstrated that expression of the ER was not required for clomiphene inhibition of EBOV infection, suggesting that these drugs are not acting through their known targets. Follow-up work with EBOV virus-like particle (VLP) entry assays indicated that these drugs inhibit EBOV VLP entry after binding and internalization. Together, these findings suggest that clomiphene and toremifene inhibit EBOV infection through pathways unrelated to the classical estrogen pathway.

SNIP~
http://stm.sciencemag.org/content/scitransmed/5/190/190ra79.full.html <<<<More @link
*FAIR USE FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY*
 
Top