Dem Michelle Obama as Joe Biden’s VP would make the election a ‘lay down Misère’

[MetalMan]

Michelle Obama as Joe Biden’s VP would make the election a ‘lay down Misère’
RT 11:12

Former advisor to President Bill Clinton, Barbara Heineback, has told Sky News Joe Biden has no strength to point to in his decades long career, and his weakening cognitive ability will really hurt him in the election. The former vice president and presumptive Democratic nominee for President Joe Biden is currently leading in most national polls by up to 15 per cent. However, questions have been raised throughout the media as to Mr Biden’s cognitive function given his advanced age, which has raised the anticipation surrounding his running mate choice more so than in previous elections. “Biden’s pluses are the fact that Democrats … they want Trump out no matter what. His other strong strength is the fact that he has most of national media behind him,” Ms Heineback told Sky News host Chris Kenny. “He also has these lapses of memory and his cognitive abilities are really weakening”. Mr Kenny said although she has declined to involve herself on Mr Biden’s ticket, former First Lady Michelle Obama is a chance to Mr Biden’s vice presidential nomination. “I reckon they put Michelle Obama on that ticket, and it is a laydown misere,” he said.

This is reporting from Australia and this is a pro Trump site.
The comments at the site is interesting also.


Graygreen 644 hours ago
Are you guys buying this crap, who could possibly vote for Biden? Who's putting these pills out? MSM rubbish,



Ann Sharp5 hours ago
Joe Biden cant even control his own BLADDER LET ALONE HAVE A DEBATE OR RUN A COUNTRY..



stgnsw5 hours ago
Same crooks over and over. They would do a great job together FOR CHINA



Steve Butler4 hours ago
Biden is sniffing out top VP candidates. The best smelling hair will win.



col5 hours ago
One does not accidentally call his wife Michael



Steve main5 hours ago
DO IT big mick. THEN. TRUMP LANDSLIDE



Brett Mitchell5 hours ago
Shiny Head getting very excited at a Big Mike Presidency.



Ricky5 hours ago (edited)
Is Biden the man to get rid of Trump? No, Michelle Obama is the man to do it. Sorry I couldn’t resist.

 

[bw]

An explanatory note would help.

 

[von Koehler]

I have absolutely no idea what "lay down mesire" means and found this, but it still doesn't make much sense to me:

The phrase "a lay down mesire" is missing from these archives. It means that something is a certainty to happen, and is common in Australia/New Zealand slang. e.g. "This election is a lay-down mesire for the Groovy Party." Its origins are in the card game 500. In normal play the idea is to win a number of tricks bid (or more). But if a player has a very poor hand, they can opt to bid to lose every trick in the hand ("mesire" bid), and further if they lay their cards on the table it is an "open mesire" or "lay down mesire", and often carries enough points that the game can be won in a single hand.

 

[MetalMan]

I have absolutely no idea what "lay down mesire" means and found this, but it still doesn't make much sense to me:

The phrase "a lay down mesire" is missing from these archives. It means that something is a certainty to happen, and is common in Australia/New Zealand slang. e.g. "This election is a lay-down mesire for the Groovy Party." Its origins are in the card game 500. In normal play the idea is to win a number of tricks bid (or more). But if a player has a very poor hand, they can opt to bid to lose every trick in the hand ("mesire" bid), and further if they lay their cards on the table it is an "open mesire" or "lay down mesire", and often carries enough points that the game can be won in a single hand.

Think
Slam dunk
Sure thing
Easy win

Australia/New Zealand slang.

 

[bw]

Far as I can tell, it means something that's certain to fail. It's obscure enough to be an absolutely terrible phrase to include here. It's apparently more common in Australia, where the OP was written.

 

[von Koehler]

Perhaps it makes more sense if you played Australian card games? Or could speak Australian fluently?

Still not clear to me, seems like ultimately winning by losing?

 

[MetalMan]

Far as I can tell, it means something that's certain to fail. It's obscure enough to be an absolutely terrible phrase to include here. It's apparently more common in Australia, where the OP was written.

Australia/New Zealand slang can be confusing to Americans just as American slang confuses Them.
In Australia/New Zealand you could hear someone say "Call my wife and tell her I got pissed last night and I'm in jail."
pissed in this case means drunk. "Boy am I pissed." means something different in Australia/New Zealand than it does in America.

The wording I used in the title is the wording used on the site.

 

[Troke]

I am of the opinion that Michelle will not run unless she is convinced it is a 'slam dunk'.

So, should she run, we got our work cut out for us to prove her wrong. And make sure that Trump has a friendly Congress.

 

[The Snack Artist]

The real question is, "Can the Ds keep Dementia Joe out of any spotlights for 4 months?" I keep thinking he HAS to come out at some point. Every time he does, he gaffes. Don't believe the polls.

 

[Cacheman]

I am of the opinion that Michelle will not run unless Barry is convinced it is a 'slam dunk'.

 

[dstraito]

Think

If you tell a lie often enough people will start to believe it

I have witnessed this myself when family members who do not ever investigate anything for themselves quote CNN verbatim.

 

[von Koehler]

Biden's VP pick will show who the Democrat party insiders really want to be President.

Or here is a really terrifying scenario Biden and his VP simultaneously resign and the third in line becomes the replacement President.

Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker of the House. It is in the Constitution.

 

[Hawkgirl_70]

The real question is, "Can the Ds keep Dementia Joe out of any spotlights for 4 months?" I keep thinking he HAS to come out at some point. Every time he does, he gaffes. Don't believe the polls.

I’ve thought for 2 months they can’t hide him forever. Now I think they will absolutely TRY to hide him until Election Day has passed, win, lose, or don’t know yet. He has the media 100% on his side and won’t call him out.
That’s NOT going to change.

 

[von Koehler]

I’ve thought for 2 months they can’t hide him forever. Now I think they will absolutely TRY to hide him until Election Day has passed, win, lose, or don’t know yet. He has the media 100% on his side and won’t call him out.
That’s NOT going to change.

There is no legal requirement for a Presidental candidate to engage in a televised debate. None.

The Democratic leadership knows full well that Biden has "mental capacity" issues and Trump would have him transformed into a babbling idiot within the first couple of questions.

But what Biden does have is nearly all of the MSM supporting him, and they will "spin" his absence as justifiable.

The Democrats have already abandoned the traditional convention for a "virtual" one.

Biden will stay in his basement for the duration of the campaign.

 

[Troke]

Whatever happens, I hope it is a landslide. Other wise it will be months before we find out who the POTUS is. BTW, no POTUS, does Nancy act as de facto POTUS? Somebody has to and she is the logical one. GAD!

 

[Seeker22]

So, let me get this right...
We are electing a person to run our country (an important endeavor) and they are looking at a presidential election as a freakin' card game? Instructive. Very.

 

[von Koehler]

[Here is part of Armstrong's reply about the coming election. Whether you think he is right or wrong is up to the reader but he does have a remarkable record of being correct. I personally have NO idea who is going to win.

The 2016 state polls were way off. So I see little use in the current polls for predictions.

Even the Fox News poll was wrong]

Nobody Will Accept The 2020 Election Result | Armstrong Economics

COMMENT: Mr. Armstrong; Socrates deserves a Nobel Prize for it is the only thing to forecast so many trends correctly. Now the news is that Trump may not

www.armstrongeconomics.com

REPLY: This election is a mess. The Democrats are in an all-out war to get rid of Trump to usher in this global Socialist agenda because everything is collapsing. They have promised states that if they maintain lockdowns to overthrow Trump, they will bail them out since they will lose nearly one year’s worth of tax revenue. Allowing voting without photo ID when you cannot get on a plane without one is the ultimate corruption, right in your face.



NEITHER side will accept the election result. There is a very STRONG possibility this entire mess ends up in the Supreme Court. These tweaks to the election rules instigated by the Democrats are all designed to further civil unrest, for they know Joe Biden is incompetent and this is all about bailing out socialism and to restrict capitalism exempting only the super-rich who bribe them for special status. So this will put a cloud over the election just to disrupt the country again.



This Private Wave began 1985.65. Trump was elected in 2016 which came in 31.4 years (Pi) into this wave which was 2017.05 (Jan 19th, 2017). Trump was sworn on January 20, 2017, at 12:00 PM EST. The turning point 2015.75 marked the peak in government confidence and negative interest rates were ushered in which has destroyed the bond markets outside the USA with artificial interest rates.



By 2019.65 (August 27) the Repo Crisis began with the peak in the Russel 2000 which is the broad perspective of the stock market 34 years into this wave. Then the reaction rally came precisely in line with the Economic Confidence Model, which turned January 18, 2020 (2020.05). Now there remains a risk that even elections will cease to exist post-2024. Chaos begins in 2022 and Authoritarianism rises 2028.65.

 

[bw]

The wording I used in the title is the wording used on the site.

No criticism of you was intended. The phrase apparently means a slam-dunk win or a slam-dunk loss, depending on context. It might seem clear to an Australian, but not to others.

 

[Meadowlark]

Michael has zero qualifications to run as a vp. I suspect her negatives far out weigh her alleged positives. She has zero personality and comes across as a very angry man/woman thing.

I also refuse to believe the sqewed polls that have creepy Joe on top. These are the same polls that had hitlery winning by a land slide for petes sake!

 

[Ractivist]

Biden relinquished his run to Mike shortly before election, she makes a speech like Barry did, perhaps even debates trump, "in a very controlled narrated debate. You know, the ones where they just answer questions, softball or hardball based on the contender. Massive fraud, massive media fawn, and its UN American to contest the vote as All fraud is suppressed.

Possible.p scenario. Perhaps brining in Oprah as VP.