GOV/MIL Main "Great Reset" Thread

marsh

On TB every waking moment

in speech to Boao Forum for Asia
Author of the article:
Financial Times

Financial Times
Ryan McMorrow
Publishing date:
Apr 20, 2021 •
Journalists watch a screen showing China's President Xi Jinping speaking during the Boao Forum for Asia Annual Conference 2021 in Boao, China.
Journalists watch a screen showing China's President Xi Jinping speaking during the Boao Forum for Asia Annual Conference 2021 in Boao, China. PHOTO BY STR/AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES

BEIJING — Xi Jinping has called for a new world order, using a speech at China’s flagship business event to launch a veiled attack against U.S. global leadership and to warn against economic decoupling.

“International affairs should be handled by everyone,” the Chinese president told the Boao Forum for Asia, an event billed as the country’s answer to the World Economic Forum in Davos. Last year’s summit was cancelled because of the coronavirus pandemic.

Xi calls for new world order as he warns against economic decoupling

Xi did not name the U.S. in his 18-minute speech but he took aim at Washington’s efforts to decouple supply chains and bar the sale of critical American semiconductors and other high-tech goods to Chinese companies such as Huawei.
The unilateralism of individual countries should not give the whole world a rhythm
CHINA PRESIDENT XI JINPING
“The rules set by one or several countries should not be imposed on others, and the unilateralism of individual countries should not give the whole world a rhythm,” he said.

Xi made the comments just days after U.S. President Joe Biden and Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga committed to working together to oppose Chinese coercion in the South and East China seas.

Washington and other Western governments have also been highly critical of Beijing’s crackdown on Hong Kong and human rights abuses against Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang.

“Bossing others around and interfering in other countries’ internal affairs will not be well received,” Xi said.

Dozens of journalists attend Xi Jinping’s opening speech at the Boao forum.
Dozens of journalists attend Xi Jinping’s opening speech at the Boao forum. PHOTO BY STR/AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES

Despite the geopolitical tensions, U.S. businesses are eager to expand operations in China, which posted 18.3 per cent year-over-year economic growth in the first three months of 2021. U.S. banks in particular have been keen as Beijing gradually opens up its financial markets.

Western executives scheduled to participate in the four-day Boao Forum, which wraps up Wednesday, included Apple chief executive Tim Cook, Goldman Sachs president John Waldron, Tesla boss Elon Musk and Stephen Schwarzman of Blackstone.

Shi Yinhong, director of the Centre on American Studies at Renmin University in Beijing, said there was no doubt that the United States was the target of Xi’s remarks. “In the eyes of China, the U.S. is still hegemonic,” he said.

Xi also called for closer global co-operation on developing, manufacturing and distributing COVID-19 vaccines to improve access in developing countries.

“We want to make (the vaccine) truly accessible and affordable to people of all countries,” Xi said.

Chinese vaccines developed by Sinopharm, Sinovac and CanSino have already been produced in countries that have signed up to its Belt and Road Initiative, including Brazil, the United Arab Emirates and Malaysia.

Xi insisted that vaccines were global public goods and promised to provide more help for developing countries to overcome the pandemic and seek broader global co-operation in public health and traditional medicine.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Joe Biden Is Promoting An Energy Company That His Energy Secretary Is Heavily Invested In

By Mike LaChance
Published April 22, 2021 at 12:00am
Jennifer-Granholm.jpg


Joe Biden is promoting an energy company called Proterra as he tries to sell the country on his infrastructure package.

Would you be surprised to learn that Biden’s energy secretary Jennifer Granholm is heavily invested in Proterra?

There’s a term for this. It’s called crony capitalism.

The Washington Free Beacon reports:
Biden to Showcase Business Tied to Energy Sec Granholm
Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm owns up to $5 million in the electric battery and vehicle manufacturer President Joe Biden will promote on Tuesday as part of his push for a $1.9 trillion infrastructure bill.


Biden’s virtual visit to the electric battery producer Proterra comes days after Vice President Kamala Harris paid a visit to Thomas Built Buses, a North Carolina-based school bus company that counts Proterra as its main supplier of electric vehicles. The back-to-back White House visits to Granholm-connected companies risk at least the appearance of impropriety and demonstrate how lawmakers can use policy initiatives to pad their own wallets.
Biden’s infrastructure package includes a $174 billion investment in the electric vehicle market, calls for the replacement of “50,000 diesel transit vehicles” in favor of electric alternatives, and creates a Clean Buses for Kids program that will “electrify at least 20 percent of our yellow school bus fleet.”

Granholm has taken a leading role in the administration’s forthcoming infrastructure package. The president in February tasked her with “identifying risks in the supply chain for high-capacity batteries, including electric-vehicle batteries, and policy recommendations to address these risks.”
Doesn’t this count as a conflict of interests?
THREAD:
SCOOP from me and @CAndersonMO in @FreeBeacon
Today, @POTUS is virtually visiting *one company* to tout his $1.9 trillion infrastructure plan: @Proterra_Inc
His @ENERGY sec, @SecGranholm owns up to $5 million in Proterra stock optionsBiden to Showcase Business Tied to Energy Sec Granholm - Washington Free Beacon
(1/4)
— Matthew Foldi (@MatthewFoldi) April 20, 2021
YESTERDAY, @VP @KamalaHarris visited *another* Proterra-connected company: @ThomasBuiltBus, which counts Proterra as a partner
Consecutive visits to Granholm-connected companies demonstrate how lawmakers can use admin policies to pad their pocketsBiden to Showcase Business Tied to Energy Sec Granholm - Washington Free Beacon
(2/4)
— Matthew Foldi (@MatthewFoldi) April 20, 2021
Granholm spent 5 years on Proterra’s board. On 1/16 she promised to “avoid any actual or apparent conflict of interest in the event that I am confirmed”
She also pledged to sell her stocks which Biden’s White House confirmed to us she has not doneBiden to Showcase Business Tied to Energy Sec Granholm - Washington Free Beacon
(3/4)
— Matthew Foldi (@MatthewFoldi) April 20, 2021
Biden placed Granholm in charge of “identifying risks in the supply chain for high-capacity batteries, including electric-vehicle batteries, and policy recommendations to address these risks.”
A key Proterra product? Electric-vehicle batteriesBiden to Showcase Business Tied to Energy Sec Granholm - Washington Free Beacon
(4/4)
— Matthew Foldi (@MatthewFoldi) April 20, 2021
Will the liberal media cover this? Would they if it was Trump?

You know they would.

Cross posted from American Lookout.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

“My Advice For You is to Choose Wisely” – Greta Thunberg Threatens Congress on Earth Day (VIDEO)

By Cristina Laila
Published April 22, 2021 at 11:15am
IMG_0324.jpg

Swedish teen climate activist Greta Thunberg put politicians on notice during her testimony before Congress on Earth Day.

Thunberg on Thursday warned politicians that today’s youth will decided how those in power “will be remembered” so tread lightly and take action to fight climate change now.

Thunberg has a myriad of mental health issues. She is autistic, has obsessive-compulsive disorder, suffers from Asperger syndrome and selective mutism, but she knows what’s best for the world — just ask her.

Children and teenagers know what is best for this world so we must do as they say, according to Greta Thunberg.

“We, the young people, are the ones who are going to write about you in the history books. We are the ones who get to decide how you will be remembered. So my advice for you is to choose wisely,” Thunberg said to Congress.

WATCH:
View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1385246980893462533
1:57 min

.@GretaThunberg to politicians: “We, the young people, are the ones who are going to write about you in the history books. We are the ones who get to decide how you will be remembered. So my advice for you is to choose wisely.” pic.twitter.com/Slkn4QzLil
— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) April 22, 2021
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Biden Climate Envoy John Kerry: “We Need to Get Carbon Dioxide Out of the Atmosphere” (VIDEO)

By Cristina Laila
Published April 22, 2021 at 12:50pm
IMG_0336-1.jpg

Special climate envoy John Kerry spoke at Joe Biden’s Leader’s Climate Summit on Thursday.

World leaders spoke at a US-led virtual climate summit on Earth Day.

John Kerry dropped this gem on the world stage:

“Even if we get to net zero, we still have to get carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere,” Kerry said of carbon emissions.

John Kerry “offsets his carbon” by owning several mansions, a private jet and a mega yacht.

According to a report by Fox News, John Kerry’s private jet emitted 166 metric tons of carbon over the past year – the same as 36 cars would in one year.

Now he’s claiming we need to completely remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

WATCH:

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1385266689856704514
.31 min
 

von Koehler

Has No Life - Lives on TB

Bill Gates, Dozens of World Leaders to Attend Biden Climate Summit
Bill Gates, Dozens of World Leaders to Attend Biden Climate Summit

(Getty)
Tuesday, 20 April 2021 05:47 PM


Bill Gates will address a climate summit hosted by President Joe Biden this week and nearly all of the 40 world leaders that were invited have confirmed they will attend, according to a source familiar with matter.

Microsoft Corp co-founder and philanthropist Gates will address the second day of the summit, which kicks off virtually on Thursday and will conclude on Friday.

The White House event paves the way for another global summit in November in the Scottish city of Glasgow that aims to ensure the world meets a goal of limiting planetary warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius.

French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Boris Johnson are among the leaders of countries that contribute the most to emissions who will speak.

Biden has made fighting climate change a top domestic and international priority and this week's summit is a chance for him to convince his counterparts that the United States is back as a leader on the issue after former President Donald Trump pulled out of the Paris Agreement to cut global emissions.

Biden brought the United States back into the accord at the beginning of his administration in January and the White House plans to unveil a new commitment to cut U.S. greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 shortly. Sources familiar with the matter expect the administration to pledge to cut U.S. emissions around 50% compared with 2005 levels.

On Thursday, major economies will discuss those climate change commitments, according to the source familiar with the plan. Finance, the role of capital markets, adaptation and resilience to climate change will also be discussed.

On Friday the president's "Build Back Better" program will be in focus. Biden has made clear he sees fighting climate change as an opportunity to create jobs, and his infrastructure bill includes funding that is critical to his administration's plan to reduce greenhouse gases.

Innovation in clean energy and "industries that have yet to be created" will also be discussed. Gates will address that broad topic with his remarks. The software developer has invested some $2 billion toward the development of clean technologies.

Meanwhile, in the real world, global temperatures have dropped one degree Celsius and there is a record volume of snow on the ground.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Watch: Rand Paul Warns Of "Climate Corps Youth" Plan In "Horrendous" Green New Deal

THURSDAY, APR 22, 2021 - 01:35 PM
Authored by Steve Watson via Summit News,

As extreme leftists within the Democratic party formally reintroduced their radical ‘green new deal’ Tuesday, Senator Rand Paul warned that the vast spending plan seeks to overturn the voter economy, do away with free market capitalism, and even create armies of youths dedicated to implementing socialist policy.



Appearing on Fox News, Paul warned that the far left “definitely think that money grows on trees, and I guess that’s part of the green plan.”

While the plan has been touted as a $172 Billion spend, Paul note that “if you add all of it up from the infrastructure bill, it’s actually about $500 billion.”

“There’s $174 billion for weatherising houses, which never gets to energy efficiency, to meet the cost. There’s about $100 billion for electric cars,” Paul also noted.

There’s $10 billion for some kind of army of climate change people, some kind of climate corps youth which I think has connotations in our history of these sort of government informed youths out there marching for things that the government tells them to do,” the Senator further warned.

The Civilian Climate Corps Act, introduced along with the new deal Tuesday says that a civilian army should exist “to mobilize the next generation of conservation and resilience workers and maximize the creation of accessible training opportunities and good jobs.”
“I think all of it is horrendous but the biggest problem is the financial drain on the future of our country by spending so much money we don’t have,” Paul urged.
Countering the argument made by the likes of Bernie Sanders that the deal will create millions of jobs, Paul emphasised that “building pyramids could create jobs, it’s really should the government be deciding where we use our dollars and where they’re spent and where the jobs are created, or should the market place?”

The Senator continued, “In the market place we vote. So when I go to Walmart or Kroger, I vote on what needs to be produced by buying something. So what is produced and where the jobs are created are what I like to eat or what I like to buy at Walmart, that is the consumer driven capitalist way where we vote in the economy. When government does it, it means I don’t get to vote as a consumer, Bernie Sanders gets to decide it.”

Paul also noted that when it comes to policy that actually has an effect on the carbon footprint, Democrats are opposed.
“One industrial decision has accounted for more reduction in carbon than any other decision in the history of this movement, and that’s fracking,” Paul noted.

“And so they are against the one thing that has reduced the carbon footprint, as we’ve converted to natural gas,” he added.
The plan, being pushed by the likes of Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) calls for transitioning to a 100 percent carbon free-economy, as well as meeting 100 percent of power demand from zero-emission energy sources like wind and solar.

Critics have warned that it will collapse an already stretched economy while handing government total control over all aspects of society.

– a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown. Also, we urgently need your financial support here.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Watch Live: Biden Unveils Plan To Slash US Greenhouse Gas Emissions By 50% During Global Climate Summit

THURSDAY, APR 22, 2021 - 07:40 AM

Update (0830ET): President Biden and VP Harris kicked off the Leaders Summit on Climate Thursday with welcoming remarks, calling on the world leaders to take action to combat climate change collectively as he announced his aggressive new goal on greenhouse gas emissions, which we noted below.

Following opening remarks, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called on countries, especially major emitters, to submit new and more ambitious plans laying out actions and policies that will align the next 10 years with a "2050 net-zero pathway."

The White House has published a proclamation for Earth Day to mark the occasion. A list of attendees has been shared here.

* * *
President Biden is reportedly aiming to reduce the US greenhouse gas emissions by 50% to 52% (compared with 2005 levels) by the year 2030, according to a flurry of leaked reports in the NYT and other media outlets Thursday morning.
These new measures will force Americans to transform the way they drive, heath their homes and manufacture goods as Biden drags America toward the distant goal of carbon neutrality.

The reports hit just hours before the start of President Biden's virtual climate summit, where he will be joined by a host of world leaders, including President Vladimir Putin, of Russia, and President Xi Jinping, of China. The virtual two-day summit is slated to begin Thursday at 0800ET. Biden planned the summit around Earth Day to help proclaim the US's "return to a position of global leadership on the issue" of climate change, according to the NYT.

Readers can watch live below:

View: https://youtu.be/p9QLW7CoQRk
7:36:15 min

In total, some 40 heads of state are expected to participate in the summit, along with Pope Francis, Bill Gates, a range of Biden Cabinet members and former Secretary of State John Kerry, Biden's special presidential envoy for climate.



Biden's new greenhouse gas reduction target is "is a significant step up from the Obama administration’s pledge of a 25 percent to 28 percent reduction by 2025 and it is meant to signal that Mr. Biden’s decision to rejoin the Paris Agreement on climate change is just the start of an aggressive effort that will include trying to press other nations forward." Biden is expected to declare that "the United States is back, ready to reinstate climate rules and accelerate a shift of the world’s largest economy away from fossil fuels."
"The United States is not waiting, the costs of delay are too great, and our nation is resolved to act now," according to a statement from the White House.
Speaking with reporters Wednesday night, one senior administration official said the new target would give the United States significant leverage for pushing other countries to do more and hinted at new target announcements on Thursday from Canada, Japan, Argentina and Korea — though not from China, the world’s largest greenhouse gas emitter.

While Democrats cheered the president on, Republicans slammed Biden for attempting to use his unilateral authority to impose pieces of the controversial Green New Deal first introduced by AOC and Sen. Markey of Massachusetts
“The American people don’t need arbitrary pledges or Democrats’ command-and-control approach that could cripple our economy without addressing the true problem that is global emissions,” Representative Kevin McCarthy of California, the House Republican leader, said in a statement.
Senator John Barrasso, Republican of Wyoming, said that the president was “unilaterally committing America to a drastic and damaging emissions pledge” that would punish the U.S. economy while “America’s adversaries like China and Russia continue to increase emissions at will.”

Back on the home front, addressing the climate crisis is an expensive pillar of the president's infrastructure package. Green initiatives face skepticism from Republicans as well as some Democrats

During an interview Thursday morning on CNBC's "Squawk Box", Sen. Pat Toomey slammed Biden for trying to move climate-change-related policies under the umbrella of "infrastructure" spending.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1385191572669612032
1:15 min

As for how Biden's summit might impact markets, Bloomberg warned that shares of electric-vehicle stocks, alternative energy stocks and traditional oil & gas companies will likely come into focus.

The summit "is aimed at establishing/reestablishing the United States’ international leadership on the environment," Height Securities LLC analysts Benjamin Salisbury and Josh Price said in a note. JPMorgan told clients that the event could be a catalyst for solar companies like Plug Power, Bloom Energy, Sunnova, Sunrun and Array Technologies, and recommended that investors buy these stocks on the recent weakness in these shares. On the other hand, the unveiling of new emissions standards could hammer traditional auto stocks like Ford and GM, while oil giants like ExxonMobil, Chevron and Occidental Petroleum will also be closely watched.

Biden has strong executive authority to change fuel-efficiency standards for vehicles and greenhouse-gas regulations for power plants, they added. The WilderHill Clean Energy Index has fallen about 15% over the past month. A rotation to value from growth has hurt the group, along with sentiment cooling after a 200% runup in the index last year, which propelled fears of a bubble.

Height thinks methane emissions could be in focus, which could impact LNG shares including those of the US's largest LNG exporter, Cheniere Energy said Tuesday it's in favor of policies that help to limit methane emissions.

In summary, the event will begin Thursday with remarks from VP Kamala Harris. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and World Bank chief David Malpass are expected to join a session Thursday about how to finance climate change solutions.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

IEA Issues "Dire Warning" About 5% Rise In CO2 Emissions Happening As A Result Of Covid Re-Opening

THURSDAY, APR 22, 2021 - 04:15 AM
The International Energy Agency (IEA) has issued what is being called a "dire warning" about CO2 emissions, stating that global emissions are going to rise 5% this year - likely as a result of the economic rebound attributed to Covid.

The agency said the levels would be "anything but sustainable" for the climate, Reuters reported Tuesday. However, estimates for emissions wound come in under 2019's peak.

The IEA released its Global Energy Review for 2021 and predicted CO2 levels would rise to 33 billion tons this year, up 1.5 billion tons from 2020. It marks the "largest single increase in more than a decade".

In 2020, as power use dropped due to the pandemic, energy-related CO2 emissions fell by 5.8% to 31.5 billion tons. They peaked in 2019 at 33.4 billion tons.

IEA Executive Director Fatih Birol said: "This is a dire warning that the economic recovery from the COVID crisis is currently anything but sustainable for our climate." (emphasis mine)

The rise will be chalked up to a resurgence in coal power due to the economic re-opening. Yet, despite the panic and the talk of a "dire warning", 2021 emissions are set to come in under 2019's peak - and there's a reasonable explanation for the 5% rise that the IEA is making noise about.

Meanwhile, overall global energy demand is expected to increase 4.6% in 2021, led by emerging markets and developing economies. Fossil fuel demand is also forecast to grow in 2021, as coal and gas demand is expected to rise above 2019 levels. "More than 80% of the projected growth in coal demand in 2021" will come from Asia, the report noted.

The report is expected to "put pressure" on the Biden administration to act (read: print money we don't have and allocate it to every "green" boondoggle in sight) on climate change.

[COMMENT: Obviously, only permanent "lockdown" is sustainable.]
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Peak ESG: Exxon Proposing $100 Billion Taxpayer-Backed Carbon Capture Project

THURSDAY, APR 22, 2021 - 02:45 AM
Exxon is trying to cash in on some of the ESG hysteria that has gripped markets over the last 18 months by offering up the idea of a $100 billion hub to capture carbon dioxide along the U.S. Gulf Coast.

And given all the hot money in ESG and the Biden administration's propensity to print and throw cash at anything that sounds the slightest bit "green" without paying any rhyme or reason to cost/benefit, we can't say we blame Exxon.

Exxon "along with a multitude of private and public partners" would build the facility to trap emissions from refineries and facilities along the Houston Ship Channel, the Houston Chronicle reported. The facility "could bury 50 million tons a year beneath the Gulf of Mexico by 2030", the report notes. This is more than all CCS projects currently in operation.

The cost of such a facility had never made sense in the past, which is why Exxon is now lobbying for taxpayer money to engage in the project. “It will need government and private-sector funding, as well as enhanced regulatory and legal frameworks that enable investment and innovation,” the company said.


The company had started a similar, smaller project in Wyoming last year, but it was put on hold due to (surprise) the economics amidst the pandemic.

And while Exxon is trying to tap into the ESG mania, Board Member Jeff Ubben has also been warning about some of the ESG products on the market. Back in March we noted that there probably isn't much of a better weathervane on ESG investing than Ubben. Ubben was ahead of the curve in embracing the idea of ESG investing before it became the FOMO-investing-technique du jour for most of 2020 and 2021.

Back in January 2020, Ubben was praising BlackRock for its stance on climate change. “It is pretty exciting,” he said. “ESG, that’s the ticket that’s how we get the long-term back."



But then in March 2021, just 15 months after his original comments, Ubben went on record in saying BlackRock's ESG products "won't address climate change".
In what now was perhaps a bit of telegraphing and pre-planning, Ubben called them "misguided" last month and said he takes exception to the ESG products because "they don’t reward carbon-intensive companies that are reducing emissions".

Ubben said that simply buying ETFs because they have a high ESG score has a "very second or third derivative effect" on climate change.

And, of course, Ubben is right and is waking up to a reality that, eventually, we expect the rest of the market to open its eyes to. We have constantly documented the numerous "ESG" funds that have hilariously bought up names like Chevron, Exxon, Microsoft, Apple and other names that seemingly don't have any "extra" added environmental benefits to them.

1619121183307.png

Some ESG funds break down to look just like index funds. Others seem hilariously askew to be "ESG" focused.

Last month we wrote that Tariq Fancy, former chief investment officer for Sustainable Investing at BlackRock, wrote an op-ed in USA Today, admitting that Wall Street is greenwashing the financial world, making sustainable investing merely PR, which is a distraction from the problem of climate change.

Fancy appeared later in the day on CNBC and stunned the always-ready-to-virtue-signal anchor by telling her that that “the financial services industry is duping the American public with pro-environment, sustainable investing practices.”

Video on website 4:47 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Doug Casey On The Shocking 2025 'Deagel' Forecast: War, Population Reduction, & The Collapse Of The West

WEDNESDAY, APR 21, 2021 - 09:40 PM
Via InternationalMan,com,

International Man: Deagel is a private online source for the military capabilities of the world’s nation-states. It recently released a shocking five-year forecast.

The report analyzes countries by projected population size, GDP, defense budget, and more.

In it, they predict a 70% reduction in the size of the United States population.

This is a bold prediction. What are your thoughts on this?


Doug Casey: I’ve got to say that I wasn’t familiar with Deagel - it keeps a low profile. Deagel is in the same business as Jane’s—which has been in the business of analyzing weapons systems for many decades.

A look at the Deagel website, which is quite sophisticated, makes it clear we’re not dealing with some blogger concocting outrageous clickbait. It seems to be well-connected with defense contractors and government agencies like the CIA.

They’ve predicted that about 70% of the US population, and about the same percentage in Europe, is going to disappear by 2025. It’s hard to believe that anybody in their position would make a forecast like that. There’s no logical business reason for it, especially since it was done before the COVID hysteria gripped the world. It stretches a reader’s credulity.

Could it possibly happen? It would be the biggest thing in world history. Does it have a basis in reality, or is it just some bizarre trolling exercise? I’m not sure—it’s hard to take almost anything from any source at face value these days.

But for the last several years, I’ve been saying that World War III would basically be a biological war. Of course, it will have substantial conventional, nuclear, space-based, and AI/computer elements as well, but its most serious component will be biological. Essentially, it will involve the use of bacteria and viruses to wipe out the enemy. The odds are that it will be between the US and China. But since anyone with a CRISPR in their garage can hack the genome and DNA of almost anything and anybody… there are no limits to the possibilities.

Certainly, from the Chinese point of view, a biological war makes all the sense in the world. That’s because the Han Chinese share a lot of genetic similarities. Presumably, a bacteria or virus can be bred to favor the Chinese and take out most everybody else. The fact is that anything that can be done eventually will be done. It’s just the law of large numbers.

Somebody might respond, “Well, that’s horribly racist.” Of course it’s racist.

Notwithstanding rational and philosophical arguments against it, all ethnic groups and countries are quite naturally racist. A fear of different racial and ethnic groups has been bred into humans, as a survival mechanism, over the hundreds of thousands of years since we became biologically modern.

All races and ethnic groups like to think that they’re “the best” or the most worthy, and that non-members are “other”, perhaps only marginally human.

Biological warfare plays directly into feeling.

Americans who—like everybody else—see themselves as “the good guys”, believe we’re immune to that. However, don’t forget that the US pioneered modern biowarfare. Fort Detrick, Maryland, has been an epicenter of it for over 70 years, and there are undoubtedly many other more clandestine sites where US government agencies are working on biological warfare. No doubt the Chinese and other major powers are working clandestinely as well. It’s not something anybody wants to advertise for many reasons.

What shocks me is not that a biowar is being researched or even actively wargamed, but that a connected organization like Deagel is actually saying it publicly. It’s not like what goes on in the spook community is an open book.

Deagel doesn’t explicitly say what, exactly, will cause the great die-off. But there are many advantages to biological warfare over other types of warfare, so it will probably be featured. It’s probably inevitable, now that the technology has made it practical.

What are the advantages of biowar? What might wargaming generals like about it?
  • First, it doesn’t destroy materiel. That’s a huge plus. After all, what’s the point of conquering a country if all you have to show for it is a smoking radioactive ruin? That’s the major advantage of the neutron bomb, of course; it kills the people but limits damage to buildings. Bioweapons essentially make atomic weapons obsolescent.
  • Second, bioweapons can be structured to attack only certain racial groups. That’s potentially either a big advantage or disadvantage to China. The diverse population of the US could also be either an advantage or a disadvantage, depending on who strikes first. But, on the bright side, you can perhaps immunize your own population, or at least the military and “essential” workers, to control the damage.
  • Third, bioweapons are very cheap and easy to fabricate. Anyone with access to a good high school chemistry lab is in business. There’s no need for expensive and tricky U-235 or, for that matter, any of the junk toys the Pentagon spends hundreds of billions on.
  • Fourth, bioweapons don’t need sophisticated delivery systems; again, no need for B-2s, B-52s, cruise missiles, ICBMs, or any of that. A sick tourist or two, or a few packages sent in the mail, can get the job done.
  • Fifth, bioweapons, whether they’re viruses or bacteria, not only offer plausible deniability but the potential to blame a third party. You can launch an attack, and nobody can really be sure who did it. Or even that an attack is, in fact, being launched.
There’s every advantage to biological warfare from an aggressor’s point of view. And, the aggressor doesn’t even have to be a nation-state, which is, of course, another excuse for governments to further clamp down on their populations, as COVID has shown. Guns are good self-defense weapons, and governments are trying to eliminate them; basement biowar labs are strictly offensive. Imagine the bureaucratic enforcement possibilities.

International Man: In addition, Deagel included a lengthy disclaimer, which states:

“After COVID, we can draw two major conclusions:
  1. The Western world success model has been built over societies with no resilience that can barely withstand any hardship, even a low-intensity one. It was assumed, but we got the full confirmation beyond any doubt.
  2. The COVID crisis will be used to extend the life of this dying economic system through the so-called Great Reset.”
Doug, you’ve written extensively about the economic, political, cultural, and social decline in the US—long before it became a popular topic of discussion.

Has anything changed in your perspective on the future of the US?

Doug Casey: No. I’m afraid the election of actual Bolsheviks in 2020—and I don’t use that term lightly—has sealed its fate. Not to mention that the nomenklatura in most major cities and states are cut from the same cloth.

In point of fact, the US is on such a self-destructive path that the Chinese don’t have to do anything in order to win. All they need to do is lay back and be quiet. The West is destroying itself.

As for this COVID crisis, it impresses me as 80% hysteria, a bad flu season that has been blown out of proportion. It’s well known (insofar as anything can be known, considering the abysmal quality of reporting and the extreme politicization of the issue) that COVID mainly affects the elderly, the sick, and the obese. The average age of descendants is 80; however, the ages of those who die are rarely mentioned. The media reports the number of COVID cases constantly, but that’s as meaningless as counting who gets a common cold. Anyway, aren’t all those who get infected become immune? A virus—like the Hong Kong flu, the Asian flu, the Bird flu, and the Swine flu—goes viral, then goes away. Even the Spanish flu, which was actually serious, came and went without destroying the economy. Nonetheless, the public has been so terrorized that they’re panicking to take potentially dangerous experimental injections. Even though there are numerous cheap drugs that can mitigate the virus after diagnosis, they’re never prescribed. The opinions of physicians and world-class scientists who differ with Fauci—an overpaid lifelong government employee—are actively suppressed. However, this is a whole different subject.

There is one thing I question about Deagel’s statement that you quoted: “The COVID crisis will be used to extend the life of this dying economic system through something called the Great Reset.” That’s a very odd statement because the crisis isn’t extending the life of the dying economic system. It’s putting the final nail in its coffin. It would be nice to hear how they figure that out, as COVID seems to be medically vastly overblown. The Great Reset has nothing to do with preserving the current economic system; it’s about formalizing a new one.

Here’s a wild and crazy thought. What if the real problem isn’t so much the COVID virus itself.

What if the real problem is the new vaccines. What if, after X number of months or years, they turn out to have very deadly effects? There’s a reason new drugs are tested over a period of years, which is far from the case here. Ted Turner, Bill Gates, and numerous others who think they’re “elite” have long said that the earth’s population ought to be reduced radically, perhaps by 80%. Is it too shocking to believe that some group would take advantage of this to cull the human population? It’s something that would be hard to believe even in a science fiction novel. But it now appears to be technically feasible. History is replete—overrun, actually—with psychos who try to destroy everybody once they get in power.

In point of fact, science fiction is a much better predictor of the future than any think tank has ever been. So maybe there’s a Dr. Evil at large, anxious to eliminate deplorables and other undesirables. If he exists, I doubt today’s woke transgender version of James Bond can counter him. Who knows where this is going? But it’s the wrong direction, and the trend is still accelerating.
International Man: The disclaimer in the Deagel report goes on to say,
“The collapse of the Western financial system – and ultimately the Western civilization – has been the major driver in the forecast along with a confluence of crisis with a devastating outcome. As COVID has proven Western societies embracing multiculturalism and extreme liberalism are unable to deal with any real hardship.”
Is the Western civilization seeing a confluence of crises coming together in a perfect storm?

Doug Casey: That’s a very good point. It seems like everything is starting to happen at once and at a hyperbolically accelerating rate. While the worlds of science and technology are approaching Ray Kurzweil’s utopian Singularity, the worlds of politics and sociology are approaching a dystopian anti-Singularity.

Let’s briefly look at the financial, economic, social, and political aspects of the potential collapse.

We’re absolutely en route to a gigantic financial crisis, featuring the destruction of the US dollar. And with it, the savings of a large percentage of the planet’s people will be impoverished because their savings are in dollars. Much of the value people thought they had in stocks, bonds, real estate, pensions, and insurance could disappear.

That’s bad enough, but what’s worse are the economic consequences. We’re likely to see wholesale unemployment, a collapse in business activity, and corporate bankruptcies, even while taxes go up radically. I’m increasingly of the opinion there will be a crack-up boom along the way; however, we might be entering that as we speak.

What’s even worse are the social ramifications, such as critical race theory, which emphasizes the differences between race groups, creating actual race hatred.

One consequence of the financial and economic upsets will be riots like those of 2020. The mass migration of people from alien cultures who don’t share Western values into the US and Europe is destabilizing. The US has, in fact, become a multicultural domestic empire.

The political consequences are evident. The Biden people in Washington, D.C. are exactly the same personality types who took over Russia in 1917 or France in 1789. They aren’t going to let go of the apparatus of power now that they’ve got it. They will find a way to re-install themselves in 2024.

What about the military? The US spends something like $1 trillion on defense annually, but nobody knows for certain. These budgets are complicated; military spending is hidden here, there, and everywhere. It doesn’t defend the United States; it just antagonizes foreigners. It’s also interesting that the Department of Defense is now trying to root out conservative political views from the rank-and-file soldiers.

But let’s get back to what could collapse the populations of North America and Europe by over 50%. Perhaps Deagel is anticipating a serious collapse of complex society because food won’t be grown, processed, and sent to cities. Maybe COVID is seen as just a catalyst. Most people in today’s highly urbanized world, from cubicle dwellers to ghetto rats, are incapable of surviving for more than a week if supply chains break.

International Man: The report also discusses a prediction regarding a potential war that involves Russia and China against the US.

What are your thoughts on this? Is it likely that we’ll see a conflict of this kind during the 2020s?

Doug Casey: As I said earlier, a war, at least with China, seems inevitable. It will likely be fomented by the US because, as the economy goes bad, governments always look for somebody else, an outsider, to blame.

At this point—and I recognize this will outrage jingoists and nationalists—the US government is actually the most dangerous force on the face of the planet. Much more dangerous than the Chinese, the Russians, or anybody else. Why? The US government is unique in actively and aggressively looking for trouble absolutely everywhere, sticking its nose into everything. Only the US has troops in a hundred other countries and is fighting hot wars in several more.

It’s said, for instance, that the Russians are aggressors because they may retake the Crimea and the Donbas region. Most Americans, who can’t even find these places on the map, are unaware that Crimea had been part of Russia since it was taken from the Ottomans in the 18th century and is mostly populated by ethnic Russians. Nikita Kruschev arbitrarily transferred it from the Russian SSR to the Ukrainian SSR in 1954 for personal political reasons shortly after Stalin’s death. The current problem started only after the US fomented a coup d’etat, a so-called color revolution, in Ukraine in 2014. It then made sense for Putin to retake it, much like the US tried to overthrow Castro after he ousted Batista.

In any event, it’s a problem between Russia and Ukraine and none of our business. The Biden regime butting in is somewhat analogous to Russia threatening war over the US owning Puerto Rico. We don’t need a serious war with Russia over nothing.

Taiwan is similar. Historically, it’s just a secessionist Chinese province—or not. Perhaps it’s a government in exile. But no matter; these are meaningless legalisms. Frankly, I’m on the side of Taiwan, but it’s none of our business whether they go to war with each other. US government intervention could easily start a conflict with China. It might end with the sinking of a couple of US carrier groups, or it might evolve into World War 3.

And, of course, we’re still in Afghanistan, Central Asia, and the Middle East. Plus Africa and God knows where else. The US is unnecessarily and stupidly whacking hornet’s nests everywhere in the world, bankrupting itself and making enemies, setting the stage for something really significant.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

AP: Biden Mulling Offering Asylum or Other Legal Protections to Climate Migrants
689
President-elect Joe Biden announces members of his climate and energy appointments at the Queen theater on December 19, 2020 in Wilmington, DE. Biden announced his climate and energy team that will advance an ambitious agenda to address the issues of climate change. (Photo by Joshua Roberts/Getty Images)
Joshua Roberts/Getty Images
EDWIN MORA22 Apr 2021Washington, DC951

President Joe Biden’s administration may provide immigration rights and citizenship to many foreign “climate migrants” who claim they are being displaced by climate change, the Associated Press (AP) reported this week.
On Tuesday, AP noted:
No nation offers asylum or other legal protections to people displaced specifically because of climate change. President Joe Biden’s administration is studying the idea, and climate migration is expected to be discussed at his first climate summit, held virtually Thursday and Friday.
President Biden issued an executive order on February 4 ordering national security adviser Jake Sullivan to produce a report by August 3 on “Planning for the Impact of Climate Change on Migration,” including options for protecting and resettling climate change-displaced persons.

On Thursday, Refugees International announced the formation of an expert task force on climate change and migration in response to the same executive order.
Referring to the “climate crisis” early this week, Secretary of State Antony Blinken asserted that climate changes are fueling the surge of migrants from Guatemala, El Salvador, and Honduras that is currently overwhelming resources and immigration authorities at America’s border with Mexico.

Nevertheless, none of the 40 world leaders that Biden invited to the climate summit are from the Northern Triangle, a region encompassing Guatemala, El Salvador, and Honduras.

Still, Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO) proposed a reforestation deal during the climate event Thursday (Earth Day) to curb migration to the U.S. in exchange for work visas and eventually citizenship for Mexicans and Central Americans.

Specifically, AMLO proposed that the U.S. offer temporary work visas and eventually citizenship to those who take part in a massive tree-planting program the president wants to expand from Mexico to Central America.

López Obrador said the Biden Administration “could finance” the job-creating program’s extension to the Northern Triangle, a significant source of the influx of migrants at the U.S.-Mexico border.

“I add a complimentary proposal, with all due respect, the U.S. government could offer those who participate in this program that after sowing their lands for three consecutive years, they would have the possibility to obtain a temporary work visa,” López Obrador said.

“And after another three or four years, they could obtain residency in the United States or dual nationality,” he added.

On Thursday, Senator Edward Markey (D-MA) and Rep. Nydia Velázquez (D-NY) reintroduced a bill to address the lack of protections for migrants who do not fit the definition of “refugees” under U.S. and international law.

AP acknowledged on Tuesday:
The idea still faces monumental challenges, including how to define a climate refugee when natural disasters, drought and violence are often intertwined in regions people are fleeing, such as Central America. If the U.S. defined a climate refugee, it could mark a major shift in global refugee policy.
Referring to his bill, which failed to pass in 2019, Markey’s office noted on Thursday:
[The legislation] would establish a national strategy to address global climate-driven displacement and provide the support needed to implement durable solutions for climate-displaced persons.

Although the effects of climate change often aggravate societal tensions that lead to persecution, many climate-displaced persons do not meet the US definition of refugee, and therefore, they cannot access resettlement opportunities in the United States.
Specifically, the legislation would create a U.S. resettlement pathway for people displaced by climate change,” among other things.

“We have a greater chance now than ever before to get this done,” Markey told AP, citing the president’s climate diplomacy and awareness of the problem.

The World Meteorological Organization released a report Monday claiming that climate change has displaced an average of 23 million people annually since 2010 and nearly 10 million recorded in the first half of 2020 alone, especially in Asia and East Africa. Most of the “climate refugees” moved within their own country, the report conceded.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Xi Jinping Promotes ‘Green Belt and Road’ at Biden Climate Summit
784
Chinese President Xi Jinping (R) shakes hands with US Vice President Joe Biden (L) inside the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on December 4, 2013. Biden arrived in Beijing to raise concerns over a Chinese air zone ramping up regional tensions, looking to bolster ties while also underscoring …
LINTAO ZHANG/AFP via Getty Images)
FRANCES MARTEL22 Apr 20211,837

Chinese dictator Xi Jinping used his appearance Thursday morning at the Biden administration’s Leaders Summit on Climate to promote China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), a debt trap program in which China offers predatory loans to developing countries in exchange for helping build infrastructure.

President Joe Biden invited dozens of world leaders to address the virtual summit on the occasion of Earth Day, an unofficial holiday promoting environmentalism, and offer proposals to reduce global pollution rates and discuss international programs to slow climate change.

China is the world’s biggest polluter, responsible for 28 percent of the world’s carbon dioxide emissions, according to the Union of Concerned Scientists. That rate is over twice the amount of carbon emissions as the United States, the world’s second-largest emitter. China has boasted that it intends to increase carbon emissions over the next decade and only “peak” by 2030, as permitted by the Paris Climate Agreement, while condemning Western nations whose carbon emissions have been steadily declining in the past decade.

President Donald Trump withdrew the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement during his tenure, but Biden reversed course and recommitted the U.S. to the deal as one of his first acts in office.

China’s state-run Global Times described Xi’s presence at the Leaders Summit on Climate as a “challenge” to Biden and the United States generally on its presence as the world’s dominant political power.

“Chinese experts warned that it would also be a big test for the Biden administration, casting doubts over its role as a global leader on climate change and questioning its true intention,” the propaganda outlet claimed.

Xi used his time at the summit to promote a newly rebranded “Green Belt and Road” as a solution to climate woes, a global plan in which China builds — for a profit — allegedly “green” infrastructure in developing countries. To that end, he urged the world not to ignore the contributions that developing countries can make to improving the environment.

“We must be committed to multilateralism. We need to work on the basis of international law, follow the principle of equity and justice, and focus on effective actions,” Xi said, urging a rigid “global climate governance” presumably led by China.

“We need to deliver social equity and justice in the cause of green transition and increase people’s sense of benefit, happiness, and security,” Xi urged, adding, “developed countries need to increase climate ambition and action.”

The BRI works by offering predatory loans to poor countries — most of them in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Latin America — the countries can then use to buy construction services from Chinese countries. This way, China keeps both the profits from the construction projects and interest from the loans. The projects tend to be geared towards improving transportation, such as new ports, railways, or highways in countries with minimal infrastructure.

At a Chinese economic summit this week, Xi declared China would use BRI to create universal “rules and standards” along the paths BRI projects created.

International experts have warned that BRI projects pose a significant risk to global ecology. A study by Tsinghua University, Xi Jinping’s alma mater, published in 2019 found that the BRI alone could doom Paris Agreement climate commitments.

“We have a business-as-usual scenario that says if you continue the way you are then even if every other country on the planet — which includes US, Europe, China and India — goes on a 2C pathway, this is still going to blow the carbon budget,” Simon Zadek, senior visiting fellow at the Tsinghua Center, told the Agence France-Presse (AFP) at the time. “The BRI growth dynamic is so large that if you get the carbon (emissions) wrong in a way it doesn’t matter anymore what anyone else does.”

Environmental damage has been particularly severe in Zimbabwe, where China has invested heavily in coal mining and road development through populated areas. Locals have denounced for over a year that Chinese companies are digging up entire villages and destroying ecological centers — including threatening national parks — in their search for fossil fuels.

On Thursday, while urging “ambition” on the part of the world’s biggest economies, Xi reiterated that China will openly increase carbon emissions through the next decade.

“China will strive to peak carbon dioxide emissions before 2030,” Xi said, leaving open the possibility that China will continue to increase emissions past 2030, the year the Paris Climate Agreement requires China to change its output.

Xi emphasized that world leaders “must be committed to harmony between man and nature,” which requires “systemic governance” and adherence to the United Nations and “multilateralism.”

“Green mountains are gold mountains. To protect the environment is to protect productivity and to improve the environment is to boost productivity. The truth is as simple as that,” Xi said. “We need to make sure that a sound environment is there to buttress sustainable economic and social development worldwide … we must be committed to systemic governance.”

Translators did not note a statement thanking the United States for organizing the summit from the Chinese dictator and he appeared to diminish the role America could play in the climate challenge.

“China looks forward to working with the international community, including the United States, to join the alliance [of] global environmental governance,” Xi said.

Xi notably also omitted concerns regarding his regime’s policies regarding meat markets and wild animal consumption in light of the World Health Organization (W.H.O.) publishing a 120-page report concluding the origin of the Chinese coronavirus was most likely a wild animal that infected a third-party animal that then infected humans. Senior Chinese officials stated in mid-2020 that they believed the Chinese coronavirus pandemic was the product of illegal wildlife meat sales at a market in Wuhan, the city where the pandemic originated. Animal rights groups have repeatedly urged Beijing to outlaw the sort of markets, known as “wet markets,” that lend themselves to illegal wildlife sales and allow on-site animal butchering for meat. The Chinese Communist Party has made no significant efforts to either ban or improve regulation of such markets since the pandemic began and has since shifted its theory on the origin of the virus to an unsubstantiated conspiracy by the U.S. Army beginning in Maryland.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Climate Activist Greta Thunberg to Congress: ‘How Long Do You Believe People in Power Will Get Away with It?’

Oversight Committee / YouTube video on website 4:29 min

PENNY STARR22 Apr 202199

Swedish teen climate activist Greta Thunberg lashed out at members of Congress at a House Committee on Oversight and Reform Subcommittee on the Environment hearing on Thursday, telling representatives they won’t get away with ignoring the so-called climate crisis.

“I know I’m not the one who is supposed to ask questions here but there is something I really do wonder,” Thunberg, who is 18, said. “How long do you honestly believe that people in power like you will get away with it?”

“How long do you think you can continue to ignore the climate crisis, the global aspect of equity, and historic emissions without being held accountable,” Thunberg said.

The activist, who refused to fly to the United States to attend a United Nations climate change summit in 2019 and instead traveled in a sailboat made, in part, from fossil fuel products, went on to say young people like her will be in charge of politicians’ legacies.

“You get away with it now, but sooner or later, people are going to realize what you have been doing all this time,” Thunberg said. “That’s inevitable. You still have time to do the right thing and save your legacies.”

“But that window of time is not going to last for long,” Thunberg said. “What happens then?”

“We the young people are the ones who are going to write about you in the history books,’ Thunberg said. “We are the ones who get to decide how you will be remembered.”

“So my advice to you is choose wisely,” Thunberg said.

The hearing focused on how tax benefits to fossil fuel entities are hampering the fight against climate change and should be abolished. Only one witness on the five-person panel at the hearing represented the fossil fuel sector and its stakeholders.

Frank Macchiarola, senior vice president of Policy, Economics, and Regulatory Affairs of the American Petroleum Institute, took blistering questions from Democrats who support stripping tax benefits from fossil fuel entities in President Joe Biden’s plan, promoted as infrastructure legislation.

Thunberg called the need for the hearing “a disgrace.”

“The fact we are still having this discussion, and even more, that we are still subsidizing fossil fuels directly or indirectly using taxpayer money is a disgrace,’ Thunberg said.

Thunberg gained the spotlight several years ago when she founded Fridays for Future urging young people to leave school and protest on Fridays to advance the climate change agenda.

“The simple fact and uncomfortable fact is that if we are to live up to our promises and commitments in the Paris Agreement, we have to end fossil fuel subsidies, stop new exploration and extraction, completely divest from fossil fuels, and keep the carbon in the ground,” Thunberg said.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Sen. Inhofe Introduces Bill to Prevent U.S. from Enacting Climate Rules Until China, Russia, India Do Same
9,730
Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) talks with reporters before a Senate GOP lunch meeting in the Russell Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill March 20, 2020 in Washington, DC. Lawmaker and Trump administration officials are in negotiations about the phase 3 coronavirus stimulus bill, which leaders say they hope to have …
Drew Angerer/Getty Images
EDWIN MORA22 Apr 2021712

Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-OK) will introduce legislation on Earth Day that would stop the Biden administration from enacting climate regulations until the top world’s polluters outside the United States, namely China, India, and Russia, adhere to the same regulatory standards as America.

Inhofe, the senior member of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, believes his bill, dubbed the Domestic Manufacturing Protection Act, would ultimately prevent the Biden administration from hurting American jobs and businesses amid the ongoing coronavirus pandemic by recommitting the United States to the Paris Climate Agreement.

The Trump administration pulled out of the pact.

Specifically, Inhofe’s legislation would block Biden’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from implementing any climate regulations until China, Russia, and India adhere to the same standards as the United States. The top four polluters in descending order are China, the United States, India, and Russia.
Inhofe noted:
The 2015 Paris Climate Agreement allowed the world’s biggest polluters a free pass while sacrificing American manufacturing jobs. That’s why I urged President Trump to pull out of the bad deal. Now, the Biden administration plans to not only recommit, but build upon this failed agreement. That’s why I am introducing the Domestic Manufacturing Protection Act, which holds China, India, and Russia to the same standard as the United States.
China and Russia are our greatest threats in national security and in economic competition. If we don’t want China to ‘eat our lunch’ as President Biden said, then we need to challenge them at every turn. Passing my Domestic Manufacturing Protection Act is a good step in that effort because we can’t risk a one-sided climate restriction that would give them a leg up on economic growth and trade.
Republicans believe Biden’s climate policies will kill jobs, something his own administration has conceded.

During a speech on what he described as the “climate crisis,” U.S. State Secretary Antony Blinken admitted this week some American workers “would be hit hard” by the Biden administration’s response to the “climate crisis.”

However, he added, “We won’t leave those Americans behind. We’ll provide our fellow Americans with pathways to new, sustainable livelihoods, and support as they navigate this transition.”

President Joe Biden has already imposed unilateral restrictions on the United States the senator warns will tip the playing field against American workers and manufacturers.

This week, the Biden Administration pledged to reduce U.S. emissions by 50 percent reduction by 2030, an ambitious target.

Experts at the Heritage Foundation predicted the Paris Climate Agreement target of an estimated 30 percent would cost the United States 400,000 jobs annually, suggesting that a higher goal would decimate the American job market even more.

Despite an Obama administration assessment determining that it was not an environmental threat, President Biden canceled the Keystone XL pipeline on his first day in office.

The Democrat president also froze oil and gas leasing on federal lands. His actions resulted in over 1,000 layoffs and prevented the creation of an estimated 70,000 new jobs.

China, the top greenhouse gas emitter in the world and the second-largest economy after the United States, is not committed to combating the “climate crisis.”

“Some countries are asking China to do more on climate change,” Le Yucheng, China’s deputy foreign minister, said last week. “I am afraid this is not very realistic.”

Still, “China welcomes the U.S. return to the Paris agreement and expects the U.S. side to uphold the agreement,” Chinese Vide Premier Han Zheng added.

Fighting climate change without Beijing on board would give China a significant advantage to become the world’s top economy.

Russia and India also do not appear interested in meeting any emissions reduction targets. India increased its emission in 2019 despite pledging to bring them down by one-third over the next decade.

Meanwhile, Russia is woefully “inadequate” in meeting its commitment.

Biden has invited 40 world leaders to Washington this week for a virtual Earth Day summit on climate. Blinken admitted conceded if America tackles climate change alone, it “won’t be enough” to solve the “crisis.”

“Even if the United States gets to net zero emissions tomorrow, we’ll lose the fight against climate change if we can’t address the more than 85 percent of emissions coming from the rest of the world,” he acknowledged.

Some experts noted that even if China joins the U.S., it will not be enough.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

More Victimhood: Biden Administration Announces New Program for 'Environmental Crime Victims'
By Susan Jones | April 22, 2021 | 5:39am EDT



Smog over the Los Angeles skyline. (Photo by FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images)

Smog over the Los Angeles skyline. (Photo by FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images)

(CNSNews.com) - "Victims of environmental crimes...have received insufficient support for too long," Acting Associate Attorney General Matthew Colangelo said this week, as the Biden Justice Department and Environmental Protection Agency announced a new program to "seek justice for all of these victims."

"The Department of Justice and EPA are pleased to formally announce the creation of the nation’s first-of-its-kind Environmental Crime Victim Assistance Program," Colangelo said in a speech in Washington.

Colangelo said the program was created after "several years of outreach" and examination of "on-the-ground needs and barriers to upholding rights and accessing services."

https://cdn.mrctv.org/videos/52518/52518-480p.mp4 2:26 min

"We listened and learned from victims, from victims’ rights professionals and from those working on environmental crimes investigations and prosecutions," he said.

According to Colangelo:
The program will help ensure that victims of federal environmental crimes are properly identified, that their rights are protected, and that they receive services from the opening of an investigation through the prosecution of the case.
Both agencies will have the infrastructure to ensure we meet our obligations to victims through the creation of victim-witness coordinator positions, specialized training and job aides, and outreach to victims and victims’ rights professionals.
(This will expand government, in other words.)

"Victims of environmental crime have long been an underserved and often overlooked type of victim in our criminal justice system," Colangelo said.
He gave a few examples of who the program will help:
Some are casualties of large-scale, high-profile incidents like the Deepwater Horizon disaster or the Volkswagen emissions scandal. But the majority are victims of crimes that receive much less public attention:
-- The low-wage worker given no or inadequate protective gear and exposed to asbestos fibers from a renovation or demolition project;
-- The farmworker exposed to an illegal application of a pesticide;
-- The family whose exterminator illegally applies pesticides and causes permanent brain injury to children in their home; and
-- The community located near a cluster of industrial facilities, where one polluter knowingly violates the law by exposing that community to carcinogens while the other facilities follow the law.
We serve and seek justice for all of these victims.
'Disadvantaged communities'
The new Environmental Crime Victim Assistance Program is specifically aimed at achieving "environmental justice" for "crime victims in communities disproportionately burdened by environmental harm," Colangelo said.

"President Biden and the Attorney General understand that the brunt of the harm caused by pollution and climate change is often borne by communities of color and low-income communities,” he continued.

“Within his very first week on the job, President Biden directed federal agencies to develop programs and policies to ‘address the disproportionately high and adverse human health, environmental, climate-related, and other cumulative impacts on disadvantaged communities.’”

Indeed, President Joe Biden came into office promising to "eliminate systemic racism," and promising that "every branch of the White House and the federal government is going to be part of that effort."
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

As the Pandemic Killed Millions, Callous Press Celebrated Environmental ‘Silver Lining’

Scott Whitlock and Bill D'Agostino
April 22nd, 2021 8:30 AM


Lockdown3.jpg


Over the last year, the coronavirus has caused untold misery and destruction. Over three million people are dead. Families have been forever destroyed and businesses have been wrecked by a cruel and unrelenting virus. But that hasn’t stopped a stunningly tone deaf news media from lecturing Americans about the environmental “silver lining” and “gift” of Covid-19. As the world marks Earth Day 2021, it’s worth remembering just how out of touch reporters sound when they put a happy face on a global killer of humans.

It was early on in the pandemic, March 19, 2020, that journalist Vladimir Duthiers first speculated on CBS This Morning about a “little bit of silver lining” to the pandemic. Citing a slight uptick in water clarity in Italy, Duthiers cheered, “This is Venice.... You can never see the waters because they're so murky from all the boats. This time, now you can see the crystal-clear waters of the Venice canals.”

On the April 22, 2020 episode of Today, Al Roker celebrated the environmental upside as the economy ground to a halt: “Less foot traffic, less waste, less energy consumption, allowing certain animals to thrive and impacting the Earth's atmosphere as well.” For the same day’s CBS This Morning, Jamie Yuccas offered a theme that would become common. Humans were the problem:
From a shockingly smog-free new Delhi in India to unusually clear waters in the canals of Venice, the world is suddenly learning what can happen if humans stop polluting the environment.
https://cdn.mrctv.org/videos/52490/52490-480p.mp4 1:11 min

On the April 11, 2020 early-morning edition of CNN Newsroom, host Natalie Allen gushed about the “bright spot in this era of pandemic.” The April 22, 2020 CBS Evening News sounded practically ghoulish as CBS correspondent John Blackstone gloated, “From goats in a deserted town in Wales, to lions lounging on a road in South Africa; nature seems to be saying, ‘We can get along fine without you.’"

TodayEnv_0.jpg

The seeming contempt for humanity continued into the fall. The September 8, 2020 edition of Today featured Roker again expressing his callous disregard for dying humans:
When the world went into lockdown last spring, a brief and beautiful transformation took place. Animals appearing in locations they hadn’t been seen in years. Mountains and skylines revealed after decades of shrouded in pollution.
This stinging dismissal for the mounting death toll culminated in the spring of 2021. On the April 1 Today, Kerry Sanders lectured viewers even as many may have lost someone to Covid-19: “When the nation and world shut down, Planet Earth got a rare break...” He featured University of Miami professor Ben Kirtman who offered this alarming take on the coronavirus: “It's a gift to the science, but it's also a gift to us. To society. To the human race. It demonstrates we can do this.”

Perhaps CNN climate correspondent Bill Weir summed it all up on the April 23, 2020 New Day: “There seems to be this perception that maybe the virus has helped humanity buy some time when it comes to global warming.”

In the 2018 film Avengers: Infinity War, a hulking killer named Thanos snapped his fingers and wiped out half of humanity. He does this in order to find “balance” and make life easier on Earth. In the movie, Thanos is the villain, an unhinged monster. But are his ideas much different from those espoused by many in the mainstream media? Three million dead humans later, these journalists seem to agree with Thanos that people are the problem.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Nets Hail Biden’s Radical Climate Plan as ‘Ambitious,’ ‘Visionary’

Kyle Drennen
April 22nd, 2021 1:14 PM

After the left-wing media spent the past year claiming a “silver lining” of the deadly global pandemic was a decrease in fossil fuel emissions, on Thursday, the network morning shows celebrated Earth Day by hailing President Biden’s radical climate change agenda. The economic damage his plans would cause was conveniently ignored as reporters cheered the “ambitious” and “visionary” government scheme.

“The Biden administration is pledging to slash U.S. greenhouse gas emotions by 50-52% by the year 2030,” co-host Savannah Guthrie proclaimed during a news brief on NBC’s Today show. She eagerly pointed out that the “goal was unveiled at the start of a two-day climate summit hosted by President Biden,” and “more than doubles the country’s prior commitment under the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement.”

https://cdn.mrctv.org/videos/52534/52534-480p.mp4 2:17 min

Guthrie vaguely mentioned that “emissions cuts are expected to come from power plants, automobiles, and other sectors,” but no explanation was given as to how it would happen or what the cost would be to those industries or American consumers.

The details didn’t matter to weatherman Al Roker, who, along with fellow left-wing climate crusader Bill Nye, applauded the move later in the broadcast:
ROKER: A big Earth summit today – climate summit at the White House. President Biden announcing the U.S. will reduce carbon...
NYE: By half.
ROKER: Half. At least 50% going forward.
NYE: It’s really visionary, you guys.
On ABC’s Good Morning America, correspondent Cecilia Vega framed Biden’s leftist environmental push as “sending a signal, a very strong signal, that the U.S. is back after former President Trump pulled the country out of the Paris Climate Accords.” While she admitted that the administration was “not offering a lot of details,” the reporter asserted that it didn’t really matter, it was about the symbolism: “...so much of this right now is about regaining the trust of the world and credibility when it comes to fighting climate change on the world stage and convincing other big nations around the world that they should try to do the same and make some of these same pushes.”

“Today is Earth Day and President Biden plans to announce an ambitious goal to cut America’s greenhouse gas emissions over the next nine years,” CBS This Morning co-host Anthony Mason proudly announced. He then touted new polling designed to bolster Biden: “A CBS News poll out this morning found 53% of Americans approve of the President’s handling of climate change. 56% in our poll think the issue should be addressed right now.”
Correspondent Ed O’Keefe followed:
The President is set to announce the most aggressive cuts in greenhouse gas emissions, with plans to slash them by 50% to 52% from their 2005 peak. Doing so would put the United States back in line with the Paris Climate Agreement, which, of course, this country left during the Trump administration.
As the report concluded, co-host Tony Dokoupil brushed aside any concerns over the economic cost by making the classic liberal argument that we couldn’t afford not to implement the crushing climate policies: “And there are costs, of course, to addressing climate change, but we have to remember there are costs of doing nothing, as well.”

Later on the show, the CBS hosts talked to young environmental activists and sympathized with the “climate anxiety” they were feeling.

Whenever a Democrat wants to implement a radical and controversial agenda that could cause massive economic harm, the partisan media swoon over the plans being “ambitious” and “visionary.” The term “extreme” is only ever thrown around when Republicans propose something.

The climate propaganda on NBC was brought to viewers by GEICO, it was brought to ABC viewers by Old Navy, and it was brought to CBS viewers by Procter & Gamble. You can fight back by letting these advertisers know what you think of them sponsoring such content.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Greta Thunberg makes my skin crawl.
She is funded by Soros. There was an article about how he funded her European rallies.

[UPDATE: I searched for the article, but found claims of "Fact check: False" and "Fake News" so I don't know if that is correct.]
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Biden sets target of cutting US emissions up to 52% by 2030 but won't detail how to get there

by Josh Siegel, Energy and Environment Reporter |
| April 22, 2021 06:00 AM

President Joe Biden will commit the United States on Thursday to cutting its greenhouse emissions 50% to 52% by 2030 in remarks kicking off his climate summit event with world leaders.

Biden administration officials say the target, one of the most aggressive in the world, is achievable despite the transformation of the fossil fuel-dependent economy it would entail.

And they argue it's necessary in order to keep the U.S. on pace for net-zero emissions by 2050, a marker the world must meet to achieve the goal of the Paris Agreement to hold warming to no more than 1.5 degrees Celsius.

“As much as I would like to say we know what 2030 is going to look like with certainty, the reality is our ability to achieve continues to be improved every single day by innovation,” an administration official said on a press call.

The aggressive target is symbolic and nonbinding without being approved by Congress. But Biden hopes it restores U.S. credibility and pushes other countries to submit more ambitious plans to the United Nations as part of the Paris Agreement, which former President Donald Trump rejected.

“This gives us significant leverage in pushing for climate action abroad,” a second senior administration official said. “When we close this summit, we will have unmistakably communicated the U.S. is back.”

To make his goal achievable, Biden would almost certainly need Congress to enact new domestic policies to reduce emissions from transportation and electricity, the top two polluting economic sectors. Biden’s $2.3 trillion infrastructure and climate spending proposal has the potential to be the centerpiece policy needed to reach the goal, especially if it contains his clean electricity standard proposal requiring utilities to use only zero-emissions power by 2035.

Passing the package as written, however, is far from certain, and owing to that, the administration is not yet providing a detailed road map for how it plans to reduce emissions from each economic sector to achieve its goal.

“We see multiple paths to reaching this goal,” the first administration official said, adding Biden would provide only a “high-level summary” at his two-day summit event.

A U.S. commitment to cut emissions 50% to 52% by 2030 would rank among one of the most aggressive pledges to the Paris Agreement, nearly on par with the European Union but behind the United Kingdom.

Administration officials said they expect Japan and Canada to announce more aggressive climate targets at the climate summit this week. Combined, countries representing roughly 60% of global gross domestic product are slated to announce stronger targets to curb emissions during the event.

But other large polluting countries whose leaders are attending the summit, such as China and India, are expected to hold out on new announcements, leading to criticism from Republicans in Congress that the U.S. is hampering its global competitiveness.

The new U.S. goal would essentially double the initial target set by the Obama administration as part of the Paris Agreement in 2015 to reduce emissions by 26% to 28% from 2005 levels by 2025. The U.S. was off pace to meet the Obama administration target until the the coronavirus pandemic that shut down the economy and slammed demand for transportation fuels caused a record drop in emissions last year. Emissions are expected to rise again in 2021 as the economy recovers.

Biden administration officials say the U.S. is in a better position today thanks to the dramatic fall in costs this decade of clean energy technologies such as solar, battery storage, and carbon capture enabled in part by bipartisan policies passed by Congress to provide federal research dollars and tax incentives to support them. States, cities, and individual companies have boosted their actions in the absence of the federal government during the Trump administration.

“We are standing here with better field position today than we had four years ago,” a senior administration official said.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
[I guess they think the energy fairy is going to magically produce the electricity to charge their vehicles out of thin air. They are also going to have to do some work on vehicle power. Ever see a Prius in mountain country? It is like my old Honda Civic struggling in the slow lane trying to get up the mountain. ]


12 states urging Biden to ban gas and diesel cars by 2035

Heavy-duty truck ban proposed for 2045

By Gary Gastelu FOXBusiness

The governors of a dozen U.S. states have sent a letter to President Biden urging him to pass a ban on the sale of internal combustion engine vehicles by 2035.

In the letter, seen by Reuters, the governors said that a "clear regulatory path" is required "to ensure that all new passenger cars and light-duty trucks sold are zero-emission no later than 2035 with significant milestones along the way to monitor progress."

California Governor Gavin Newsom last September issued an executive order directing the state's government to draw up guidelines for such a ban, which was followed by the passage of a bill in Washington last week that would do the same by 2030.

New York, New Jersey and North Carolina are among the signatories to the letter sent to The White House. which has not yet commented on it.

Biden's recently proposed infrastructure plan includes $174 billion earmarked toward electric car purchase incentives and the expansion of the U.S. charging network, but prior to his election, his campaign said he did not support California's all-out ban on gas and diesel-powered vehicles.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is currently in the process of writing new tailpipe emissions rules, which would overturn more lenient regulations put in place by the Trump administration.

Tesla is the only all-electric mass-market automaker that sells cars in the U.S. today. General Motors is aiming to transition to a zero-emissions lineup in all major markets by 2035, but GM North America President Steve Carlisle told Automotive News "we're all-in, but we need other people to join us. In some cases, people want electric vehicles, but in a lot of cases, they're going to demand an ICE engine. We should always be driven by what our customers want."

Other automakers, including Ford, Toyota and Volkswagen have not put a date on when they expect to become all-electric, and plan to continue to offer hybrids and plug-in hybrids alongside zero-emissions models for the foreseeable future.

The governors have also asked for heavy-duty truck sales to be all-electric by 2045.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Kerry Returns to the White House to Promise 'Green Jobs' That Don't Exist
Katie Pavlich
Katie Pavlich

Posted: Apr 22, 2021 5:15 PM


Kerry Returns to the White House to Promise 'Green Jobs' That Don't Exist

Source: AP Photo/Charles Krupa

Former Secretary of State and Biden Climate Czar John Kerry returned to the White House briefing room Thursday afternoon and promised blue collar workers a transition into green jobs...that don't exist.

"The jobs are growing there [green energy]. I'm not offering that job to somebody who may feel, 'oh my god I have a better job, I don't want to lose that job,' etc. But the job market here is going to be gigantic for electricians, plumbers, pipe fitters, steel workers, heavy equipment operators, all of these people, building out America's grid and transitioning us to this new future is going to happen in countries all over the world and we need to make sure we aren't left behind," Kerry said, citing predictions from the Bureau of Labor Statistics rather than open and existing positions.

View: https://youtu.be/6H20AX3-OWc
1:09:24 min

Last time Kerry was in the briefing room he told oil workers who have lost their jobs as a result of President Joe Biden's so-called "green" energy agenda, which includes killing thousands of Keystone XL pipeline jobs, to "build solar panels."

"What President Biden wants to do is make sure those folks have better choices, that they have alternatives, that they can be the people to go to work to make the solar panels,” Kerry said earlier this year.

View: https://youtu.be/1H310GHP9dg
2:36 min

As a reminder, the majority of solar panels are made in China.
“The recent wave of investment and capacity expansion announcements by China’s largest solar manufacturers threatens the (U.S. solar) recovery with massive overcapacity that will drive producers out of the business, and establish Chinese domination of the entire solar power manufacturing supply chain,” says Jeff Ferry, chief economist with the Coalition for a Prosperous America in a report published on January 28.

China’s big solar multinationals, like Jinko and JA Solar, have announced new expansion projects throughout southeast Asia as part of the Chinese Communist Party’s industrial strategy to dominate key Western supply chains.
While Kerry advocates for blue collar workers to give up high paying jobs in the oil industry, he continues to fly around the world on his family's private jet.
 

glennb6

Inactive

IEA Issues "Dire Warning" About 5% Rise In CO2 Emissions Happening As A Result Of Covid Re-Opening

THURSDAY, APR 22, 2021 - 04:15 AM
The International Energy Agency (IEA) has issued what is being called a "dire warning" about CO2 emissions, stating that global emissions are going to rise 5% this year - likely as a result of the economic rebound attributed to Covid.

The agency said the levels would be "anything but sustainable" for the climate, Reuters reported Tuesday. However, estimates for emissions wound come in under 2019's peak.

The IEA released its Global Energy Review for 2021 and predicted CO2 levels would rise to 33 billion tons this year, up 1.5 billion tons from 2020. It marks the "largest single increase in more than a decade".

In 2020, as power use dropped due to the pandemic, energy-related CO2 emissions fell by 5.8% to 31.5 billion tons. They peaked in 2019 at 33.4 billion tons.

IEA Executive Director Fatih Birol said: "This is a dire warning that the economic recovery from the COVID crisis is currently anything but sustainable for our climate." (emphasis mine)

The rise will be chalked up to a resurgence in coal power due to the economic re-opening. Yet, despite the panic and the talk of a "dire warning", 2021 emissions are set to come in under 2019's peak - and there's a reasonable explanation for the 5% rise that the IEA is making noise about.

Meanwhile, overall global energy demand is expected to increase 4.6% in 2021, led by emerging markets and developing economies. Fossil fuel demand is also forecast to grow in 2021, as coal and gas demand is expected to rise above 2019 levels. "More than 80% of the projected growth in coal demand in 2021" will come from Asia, the report noted.

The report is expected to "put pressure" on the Biden administration to act (read: print money we don't have and allocate it to every "green" boondoggle in sight) on climate change.

[COMMENT: Obviously, only permanent "lockdown" is sustainable.]
hehheheh.... a 5% rise... on CO2 which is 0.04% of the atmosphere, so that would become 0.042% Oh god we're all gon'a die! and all the green plants and trees will then take over the earth. they pay people our tax dollars to think up this garbage and spew it back at us.
 

glennb6

Inactive
Marsh, I want to thank you for keeping this thread going. It's important to know WTF is going on.

Marsh, I want to curse you for keeping this thread going because every time I read the latest I get more pissed off and upset.

Marsh, I'm conflicted.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Protect The Harvest
May be an image of ‎text that says '‎SEAL THE OFTEE DITAT DEUS MARCH1 MARCH11867 1867 GREAT TOPERPETUA SEALOF 1912 ORIONT 日 U SEAL OF THE STATE OF OF THE GREAT SEAL OF ORO PLATA OF VORTH WE TRUST THE STATE STATE AGRICULTURE THE GREAT 1907 COMMERCE 1796 HARYEST SEAL OF THE STATE OF SHLA ه TAH 1896 Thank You Governors For the Open Letter to President Biden About His Aggressive 30 by 30 Plan‎'‎


Fifteen State Governors Respond to President Biden's Aggressive 30 by 30 Plan
On April 21st, 2021, fifteen State Governors signed an open letter to President Biden voicing their concerns with his aggressive plan, titled, "30 by 30", which would set aside and permanently conserve 30 % of all land and water in the United States.

We thank these Governors for standing up for American property rights and values
************
April 21, 2021
President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. The White House Washington D.C. 20500
Dear Mr. President,

On January 27, 2021, your Administration issued Executive Order 14008 (“Order”), “Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad” (86 Fed. Reg. 7,619). Included at Section 216 of the Order, the Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the Secretary of Agriculture and other senior officials, was directed to develop a program to conserve at least 30 percent of the lands and waters in the United States by 2030.

The undersigned are not aware of any constitutional or statutory authority for the President, the U.S. Department of the Interior, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, or any other federal agency to set aside and permanently conserve 30 percent of all land and water in the United States, and no authority is referenced in Executive Order 14008.

While the Order does not identify which lands may be targeted by the program, the Department of Interior released a fact sheet on the same day finding that only 12 percent of America’s lands are currently “conserved,” the level of restriction, it appears, your Administration is seeking under the new policy.

Included in the figure are Wilderness lands, National Parks, National Wildlife Refuges, State Parks, National Monuments, and private lands with permanent conservation easements.

Some of us govern western states with massive amounts of lands in the categories mentioned above or other federal designations that should be considered as “conserved.” We are deeply concerned about any effort to enlarge the federal estate or further restrict the use of public lands in our states.

And even for those of us leading states without swaths of federal land, we oppose any increase in land use restrictions on lands under our state jurisdiction. Assuming there is some authority which would allow the program, obtaining the 30 percent goal from state or private lands would require your Administration to condemn or otherwise severely limit the current productive uses of such lands, infringing on the private property rights of our citizens and significantly harming our economies.

The Order directs the Department of Interior to submit a report to the National Climate Task Force within 90 days, “recommending steps that the United States should take, working with State, local, Tribal, and territorial governments, agricultural and forest landowners, fishermen, and other key stakeholders, to achieve the goal of conserving at least 30 percent of our lands and waters by 2030.”

To date, we have not been adequately consulted on the 30 x 30 program. Rather, instead of coordinating with us as the Order directs, on February 11, 2021, the Department of Interior rescinded Secretarial Order 3388, revoking the policy requiring consent from states and their local governments for federal land acquisitions under the Land and Water Conservation Fund.

Congress determines land use policies for the federal lands, while states have sole regulatory authority to govern other lands within our states. Nowhere in the laws of our nation is the authority delegated by Congress to the President or executive agencies to unilaterally change the policies governing land use in America. Section 216 of the Order appears to be a clear overreach of executive authority, which infringes on the sovereignty of the states and rights of the citizens. We cannot and will not allow this to happen.

Furthermore, Congress has specifically directed the federal executive branch through the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA), 43 U.S.C. §§ 1701 – 1787, the National Forest Management Act of 1976 (NFMA), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1600–1614, the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321–4370e, and other laws to coordinate land management plans and policies with states and their local governments and tribes. As noted, since the issuance of the Order, however, your Administration has failed to exercise any of the consultation and coordination responsibilities required by these statutes and by the very provisions of the Order.

Two months have passed since the announcement of the new program and neither the states nor the American people have been provided with any information regarding the meaning, objectives, or implementation of the 30 x 30 program, including the fundamental question of what lands will be vulnerable for increased restrictions or condemnation. There are other significant questions that, so far, have gone unanswered regarding how you will carry out the 30 x 30 program and under what authority. These include:

1. How will the lands and waters that are to be included in the 30 x 30 program be identified?
What criteria and requirements will be used?
2. The federal government already owns and manages approximately 640 million acres of land—about 28% of all land in the United States. Are the lands already owned by the federal government counted toward the 30 x 30 goal? Are these lands the program’s primary target?
3. What federal agency or agencies will be responsible for managing the 30 x 30 program? Who will make decisions about what lands and waters to place in the program and how these lands will be administered in the future?
4. What process will be followed in connection with administering the 30 x 30 program? Will a general programmatic document or similar framework be adopted to guide the program and provide notice to the public of the program and its elements? Will NEPA apply to the development and adoption of the 30 x 30 program framework?
5. How will land placed in the 30 x 30 program be managed? Will it be managed like a wilderness area, with no surface uses and restricted public access? Or will it be managed like a national park or recreation area with public access, improvements, and amenities? Will hunting, fishing, mountain biking, OHV access, and other outdoor recreational activities be allowed? Will other types of land and resource uses be allowed, such as livestock grazing, mining, and energy development?
6. How will non-federal in-holdings be treated?
7. How will the planning and management requirements imposed by the federal land management laws be coordinated with the 30 x 30 program? For example, will the Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Forest Service, and other land management agencies be required to revise their existing resource management plans to address public lands included in the 30 x 30 program?
8. Will in lieu payments or other compensation be provided to state and local governments to offset the impact of removing lands and waters from productive economic use, the loss of tax base, and other adverse effects caused by federal acquisition of these properties?
9. How will the non-federal land acquisition and management program be funded? What is the estimated annual cost of this program?
10. How will non-federal (i.e., state and private) land and waters be acquired and managed under the 30 x 30 program?
11. What is the process for working with states, local governments, and individual landowners prior to implementing the program? Will the state and local governments be consulted on federal acquisitions?
12. What will be the process when states, local governments, or landowners object to having their land and water rights taken or restricted and opt out of the program?

We are committed to ensuring all lands within our states are well managed, including the provision of abundant habitat for wildlife species. It is also our responsibility to ensure that certain federal lands, and all state lands, are being productively used by our citizens to provide the food, fiber, energy, and minerals our nation needs for a robust economy and our national defense. It is precisely because we depend on our lands to be available for future generations to enjoy and use, without greater input into this initiative, we must resist implementation of the 30 x 30 program.

We encourage your Administration to focus on better management of the lands the federal government already controls and to be more proactive in working with states. States are not simply additional stakeholders to consult in your policy development; states are essential partners and the leaders in developing innovative policies that already appropriately conserve lands, waters, and wildlife for the American people.

Sincerely,
Governor Pete Ricketts, State of Nebraska
Governor Kay Ivey, State of Alabama
Governor Mike Dunleavy, State of Alaska
Governor Doug Ducey, State of Arizona
Governor Asa Hutchinson, State of Arkansas
Governor Brad Little, State of Idaho
Governor Kim Reynolds, State of Iowa
Governor Tate Reeves, State of Mississippi
Governor Greg Gianforte, State of Montana
Governor Dour Burgum, State of North Dakota
Governor Kevin Stitt, State of Oklahoma
Governor Kristi Noem, State of South Dakota
Governor Bill Lee, State of Tennessee
Governor Greg Abbott, State of Texas
Governor Spencer Cox, State of Utah
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap

Biden Climate Envoy John Kerry: “We Need to Get Carbon Dioxide Out of the Atmosphere” (VIDEO)

By Cristina Laila
Published April 22, 2021 at 12:50pm
IMG_0336-1.jpg

Special climate envoy John Kerry spoke at Joe Biden’s Leader’s Climate Summit on Thursday.

World leaders spoke at a US-led virtual climate summit on Earth Day.

John Kerry dropped this gem on the world stage:

“Even if we get to net zero, we still have to get carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere,” Kerry said of carbon emissions.

John Kerry “offsets his carbon” by owning several mansions, a private jet and a mega yacht.

According to a report by Fox News, John Kerry’s private jet emitted 166 metric tons of carbon over the past year – the same as 36 cars would in one year.

Now he’s claiming we need to completely remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

WATCH:

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1385266689856704514
.31 min

Then plant more trees, plain and simple! That is a valid solution.

And whatta idiot hypocrite. He needs to go back to science 101.
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
This thread with all of the globalist claims wins the Pinocchio award...dang, the lies on top of lies. And Greta needs to sit down and shut up, too much attempt at over-reach...she should keep her nose out of America.

Liar, liar pants on fire, nose is longer than a telephone wire.
 

Southside

Has No Life - Lives on TB
She is funded by Soros. There was an article about how he funded her European rallies.

[UPDATE: I searched for the article, but found claims of "Fact check: False" and "Fake News" so I don't know if that is correct.]
Funded by Soros?
Almost certain that is correct. How else does an ugly sophmore get the world stage with the complicit meeeedia?
 

glennb6

Inactive
This thread with all of the globalist claims wins the Pinocchio award...dang, the lies on top of lies. And Greta needs to sit down and shut up, too much attempt at over-reach...she should keep her nose out of America.

Liar, liar pants on fire, nose is longer than a telephone wire.
indeed true!

but the terribly concerning part is that the rather permanent political people are pushing this, the WEF is pushing this, global sized and global power level corporations are fully behind and pushing the CO2/Globalshit warming/Great Reset/and whatever else plans they cook up.
The autistic loudmouth little girls, the protestors, the greenie loonies, and most minions loudmouths are but distractions and unimportant to the end game. Really, when most auto mfgrs say they plan on most or all of their vehicles to be battery powered only by 20XX, and the dozens of other examples, you can take it to the bank that if you're around in 15 yrs whatever car you can by will be plug-in only.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

John Kerry Unveils America's Latest War... On Carbon Dioxide

FRIDAY, APR 23, 2021 - 10:00 AM
Authored by Monica Showalter via AmericanThinker.com,
Three months into the job and already Joe Biden's climate czar, John Kerry, is making a fool of himself on the world stage.

Here's his choice remark for the global climate summit, as spotted by JunkScience guy Steve Milloy:

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1385266689856704514
.31 min

He wants to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere? Daily Caller confirms it.

Here's the elementary-school basics for him, from Encyclopedia Brittanica:
Photosynthesis, the process by which green plants and certain other organisms transform light energy into chemical energy. During photosynthesis in green plants, light energy is captured and used to convert water, carbon dioxide, and minerals into oxygen and energy-rich organic compounds.
Carbon dioxide is what plants live on, along with water, soil, ideal temperature, and fertilizer.

Remove the carbon dioxide and kill the plants. No more organic veggies, no more rainforest, no more bike trails, no more grain for cows, no more food for pets, and no more National Parks.

Just Jon Carry, see, and his environmental wacko billionaire elites.

That's quite a greenie agenda he's got there, turning the world brown.
Maybe he'd be happy if all the plants turned brown? And all the animals and people who depend on them thus wither away?

That's what he's saying, though we suspect this great man of 'science' doesn't realize it.

We all know that the greenie agenda is to get rid of people, but this is the first we've heard of their relentless tactics.

Kerry in fact referred to some sort of Rube Goldberg device being developed by leftist scientists at places like MIT. Who decides how much carbon is to be removed? How many brown plants are tolerable? Who pays when these men of 'science' make a miscalculation? Oh wait: Lefties never pay. They just fail upward and land in the Biden cabinet.

Kerry comes off as a particularly ignorant boob, declaring war not on man-made carbon emissions any more, (nor aerosol emissions as had been done in the past) but on carbon dioxide itself, and a creepy plan to manipulate the atmosphere, whether we like it or not. Too bad about the plants.

There were other problems with his speech, too, as Milloy, and the Competitive Enterprise Institute notes.

According to CEI, Kerry's money-quote was this:
But the challenge is this, Jonathan. The United States could go to zero [CO2 emissions] tomorrow, I mean we can’t but if you, figuratively speaking, could go to zero, we’d still have a problem. The world would still have a problem. If China went to zero tomorrow with the United States, we’d still have a problem.
His claim to reach net zero is an entirely made-up goal, and one that's impossible to reach, at a minimum because China isn't bothering. The crisis will instead extend on and on, which certainly benefits the government and its bureaucratic power.

Yet only we are supposed to destroy our economy, brown our plants, and manipulate the atmosphere, China can merrily do as it wishes. That of course, will make the climate 'crisis' permanent, and keep America down, with leaders such as Kerry to take a bow on the world stage, and even more disgustingly, entrench the government bureaucracy and end our freedoms.

It's dubious that even with China onboard, that such a goal will ever be reached in any case, because the goal is not particularly measurable. Perhaps fewer plants is the goal, more desertification. Mars, after all, is pretty much still untouched by human hands.

If that's not the idea, then Kerry is just an ignorant fool.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Yellen Urges US Allies To Spend More On Green 'Infrastructure'

FRIDAY, APR 23, 2021 - 10:25 AM
Two days ago, Treasury Secretary Yellen laid out what CNBC described as a "bold climate agenda", making clear what many have long suspected: That under Biden, Yellen will openly collaborate with her former No.2, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell, to realize the MMT-enabled vision laid out in AOC's 'Green New Deal'.


But Yellen offered even more details on the administration's targets and plans than Biden has. Yellen laid out the goal of achieving "net zero" emissions in the US by 2035. Meanwhile, yesterday, Biden said his administration would aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 50% (vs 2005 levels) by 2030, another ambitious target that will require significant public and private investment to overhaul infrastructure, private and public buildings and vehicles, among many other things.
“President Biden has outlined an ambitious strategy to transition the United States to net-zero emissions and has mobilized the entire government to achieve it,” Yellen said in prepared remarks to the Institute of International Finance. “At Treasury, our goal is to take this ‘whole-of-government’ approach and turn it into a ‘whole-of-economy’ approach.”
However, as Yellen prepares to address dozens of global leaders Friday morning - including the presidents of Russia and China, who yesterday announced new climate change targets of their own (China's President Xi promising to wean the country off coal, while President Vladimir Putin of Russia promised to crack down on CO2, emissions, commitments that President Biden praised) - her pre-released remarks feature a notably more urgent tone. This time, she's calling for "bold and urgent" international action, lest the international community risk seeing devastating natural disasters multiply in the years ahead.

When she speaks during the session, entitled "Investing in Climate Solutions," she plans to "highlight the urgent need to scale up climate finance; efforts to increase public finance for mitigation and adaptation in developing countries; and efforts to shift trillions of dollars of private investment to finance the transition to net zero by 2050."

Readers can watch the session live below. It begins at 1030ET:

View: https://youtu.be/AictUhv3C1k
3:23:59 min

Yellen is participating alongside John Kerry (Biden's special envoy for climate change) and National Economic Council Director Brian Deese.

Later in the statement, Yellen shares "two questions that keep me up at night". The first: "...how can nations best reduce emissions, while supporting economic development and growth and responding to other major challenges, such as COVID-19?"

And the second: "....how should governments target public sector climate finance to mobilize the greatest private sector investments?"

Following yesterday's reports about President Biden's plans for a revenue-crushing capital gains tax hike in the US, we suspect Yellen's commentary surrounding this second question will be closely watched by the market.

Read Yellen's prepared remarks below:

President Biden, Secretary Kerry, and other distinguished guests, I am honored to join you at today. The global community has only a short time to avoid the most catastrophic effects of climate change: We need a “sprinting start” now if we wish to achieve our goal of net-zero emissions by mid-century. President Biden has recommitted the United States to do its part to tackle this crisis and marshal the full capacity of the U.S. government.

As Treasury Secretary, I understand that finance—public and private—is crucial to enable countries to accelerate their progress toward a net-zero emissions future and cope with a climate that is already changing. But this will require economic and political choices. Government and business leaders around the world are pondering these choices, so let me mention two questions that keep me up at night.

First, how can nations best reduce emissions, while supporting economic development and growth and responding to other major challenges, such as COVID-19? This is especially challenging for low-income countries that have few available resources and pressing development needs.

Second, how should governments target public sector climate finance to mobilize the greatest private sector investments? Past efforts to support private investment have not achieved anywhere near the scale needed to green the global economy.

I can tell you that the United States Treasury will focus the full range of our tools and expertise to work with you in producing concrete and innovative answers to these questions.

Multilateral institutions are invaluable partners to the pursuit of sustainable, inclusive, and resilient development. For these reasons, we have requested $1.25 billion for the Green Climate Fund to, in part, make good on our $2 billion outstanding pledge, $485 million to support other multilateral climate initiatives, and increased support for the multilateral development banks in our 2022 Budget. And, looking ahead, we will consider requesting funds for additional new contributions to the Green Climate Fund and other initiatives.

As you will hear from our panel, while we are making progress, there is a need for redoubled efforts to boost the flow of capital and foster the growing market demand for climate-aligned investments. This effort will involve engagement on many fronts.

U.S. Treasury is working to facilitate investments in projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and protect against the impacts of a changing environment. We do that in part by providing technical assistance to foreign counterparts that helps attract private sector investment in clean energy and sustainable infrastructure projects. We are also working with the G20 and co-chairing a sustainable finance working group that will establish a sustainable finance roadmap and improve the information that private investors need to make investment decisions aligned with a more healthy and prosperous future.
In the end though, we know we will only achieve our goal of curtailing climate change through collective action. Today, we as a global community, need to be ambitious, set goals, work together, and sprint toward a cleaner, safer, better future. We look forward to meeting this challenge together.
* * *
It's worth noting that while Democrats push spending on climate "infrastructure", Republicans are disputing whether this actually constitutes "infrastructure", and whether public money might be better served rebuilding airports and bridges.

After proposing a global minimum corporate tax, Yellen's exhortations for US allies to ramp up spending on their climate change commitments are revealing.

They hint at the administration's true motives for organizing the summit. Like with taxes, the US can't simply go it alone in the fight against climate change, for fear of putting US businesses at a disadvantage.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Biden climate envoy Kerry says Trump administration 'lied to the American people' on climate change

"Years were wasted with an administration that lied to the American people," Kerry said.

JohnKerryClimatePresser

Biden administration climate czar John Kerry talks to reporters at White House.
White House

By Nicholas Sherman
Updated: April 22, 2021 - 7:43am

President Biden's global climate change envoy John Kerry says the Trump administration "lied to the American people" about climate change and set back U.S. efforts to cut carbon emissions and reducing global warming.

"The scientists told us two years ago we have 12 years within which we have to make the most critical decisions to avoid the worst consequences of the climate crisis," Kerry said Wednesday during a Washington Post Live event. "Two of those years were wasted with an administration that lied to the American people and never bought into the science."

The former senator, secretary of state and Democratic presidential candidate spoke one day before President Biden convenes a global climate summit during which he is expected to announce plans to cut in half U.S. greenhouse emissions by 2030.

Kerry also said he hopes administration's attempts to replace the fossil fuel industry with new green technology would inspire a movement similar to the space race and the industrial revolution.

"This is the greatest moment of transformation of our economy in our lifetime, certainly, and we need to seize it," he said.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Why did the EU invite Greta Thunberg and not Nobel Prize winner William Nordhaus?
20 hours ago
Charles Rotter

From CLINTEL
Cover-Undue-Climate-Haste.jpg

Press release by the Climate Intelligence Foundation (CLINTEL)

Essay “Undue Climate Haste”
21 April 2021

Optimum economic outturn is seen at 3.5 degrees Celsius of warming in 2100
Mortality due to extreme weather decreased spectacularly


Why did the EU invite the young Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg to speak in Brussels instead of the Nobel Prize winning climate economist William Nordhaus? That question is answered in an essay entitled Undue Climate Haste, which the CLINTEL Foundation is publishing today. The essay concludes: “The main message of this essay is that we are in no hurry and that panic is unwarranted. Climate change always deserves our attention, but the idea that we need to turn our energy supply upside down right now appears to be driven by emotion rather than reason.”

The EU has decided it wants to achieve net zero carbon emission by 2050. If they succeed, Europe will become the first ‘climate neutral’ continent. The media have mainly welcomed this ambition. Politicians claim that there will be many benefits of this policy: they say it will make the economy stronger and create jobs. But are these claims justified, by a cost-benefit analysis for example?

They are not, states the essay Undue Climate Haste. Remarkably the Nobel Prize (2018) winning climate economist William Nordhaus showed in his Nobel lecture in Stockholm that the ‘economic optimum’ for climate policy is to allow 3.5 degrees Celsius of warming in 2100. Economically, it is better to accept a certain amount of climate damage and to limit the cost of mitigation than the other way round: ambitious goals such as staying below 2 degrees or even 1.5 degrees are extremely costly.

Unfeasible
The climate goals of the EU are not only very costly, they are unachievable in practice. A simple calculation shows that in order to reach net zero emissions in 2050, the EU will have to deploy a new nuclear power station every week, from now until 2050. In total, 1650 new nuclear power stations would be needed. Yet today, 60 years after the first nuclear power plan went into production, there are only 450 such plants across the world.

The EU has a strong preference for ‘renewable’ energy sources, such as wind and solar, instead of nuclear. Achieving net zero with wind would require 450 new 2.5-MW turbines to be installed every two days until 2050; 82,000 windmills a year! Where would you place them all?

Unnecessary
The last part of the essay explains the EU’s haste towards its climate goal is totally unnecessary. Almost all important parameters indicate that climate change is a manageable phenomenon. We now have the technology and the wealth to cope.

The number of victims of extreme weather has decreased over the past century by more than 95%. Damage from such phenomena, corrected for the growth of the economy, has also declined slightly. Sea-level is rising, but very slowly and, moreover, no acceleration is apparent in long tide-gauge records.

Meanwhile there are strong indications that climate models, on which climate policy is largely based, are ‘oversensitive’, i.e. the real climate is less sensitive to CO2 than the climate models say it is. This means less future warming, and that CO2 reductions needed to stay below the 2 degrees target do not need to be so aggressive. Even if emissions stay above the 2020 level for the rest of the century, the 2-degree target remains in sight. Unfortunately, the climate science community rarely tells policymakers about these relatively new insights, preferring to discuss scenarios based on climate models.

The essay Undue Climate Haste was commissioned by the ECR Group of the European Parliament in Brussels.

You can read the essay here.

CLINTEL Foundation
The Climate Intelligence foundation (CLINTEL) is an independent foundation that operates in the fields of climate change and climate policy. CLINTEL was founded in 2019 by emeritus professor of geophysics Guus Berkhout and science journalist Marcel Crok. CLINTEL’s main objective is to generate knowledge and understanding of the causes and effects of climate change as well as the effects of climate policy.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

‘The Earth is on fire and we’re all going to die soon’…
Posted by Kane on April 23, 2021 3:34 am
Rumble video on website 1:57 min

Greta threatens Congress on Earth Day — Stop Freaking Out All The Kids!

“If you compare the current so-called climate policies to the overall current best available science, you clearly see that there is a huge gap. The gap between what we are doing and what actually needs to be done in order to stay below the 1.5 degrees Celsius target is widening by the second… So either you do this or you’re going to have to start explaining to your children and the most affected people why you are surrendering on the 1.5 degree target given up without even trying.”

“You get away with it now, but sooner or later people are going to realize what you have been doing this time. That’s inevitable. You still have time to do the right thing and to save your legacies, but that window of time is not going to last for long. We, the young people, are the ones who are going to write about you in the history books, we are the ones who get to decide how you will be remembered. So my advice for you is to choose wisely.”

Later during questioning, Rep. Katie Porter (D-Calif.) asked Thunberg what she should tell her nine-year-old daughter who is concerned that the “Earth is on fire and we’re all going to die soon.”

“I know that there are many young people who feel angry and sad because of all the things that some people are doing to this planet,” Thunberg replied. “That’s very understandable. It would be strange if we didn’t feel that way, because then we wouldn’t have any empathy… And if we choose to take action… there’s unlimited things that we can do… There are no limits to what we can accomplish.”

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1385301626429362176
1:59 min

View: https://youtu.be/DKQpCUih1ww
4:36 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Pompeo: 'Xi Jinping Must Be Laughing' at Biden's Climate Plan
By Susan Jones | April 23, 2021 | 9:30am EDT

President Joe Biden greets Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry at the White House for a Jan. 27 signing ceremony including executive orders on the climate. (Photo by MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images)

President Joe Biden greets Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry at the White House for a Jan. 27 signing ceremony including executive orders on the climate. (Photo by MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images)

(CNSNews.com) - "We really have no choice. We have to get this done," President Joe Biden said Thursday as he announced the United States will tackle the "undeniable" climate "crisis" by cutting in half our greenhouse gas emissions by 2030.

"That's where we're headed as a nation, and that's what we can do if we take action to build an economy that's not only more prosperous, but healthier, fairer, and cleaner for the entire planet," Biden said.

https://cdn.mrctv.org/videos/52579/52579-480p.mp4 1:36 min

"You know, these steps will set America on a path of a net zero emissions economy by no later than 2050. But the truth is, America represents less than 15 percent of the world's emissions. No nation can solve this crisis on our own, as I know you all fully understand. All of us -- all of us, and particularly those of us who represent the world's largest economies, we have to step up."

China, one of the world's largest and fastest growing economies, has to be thrilled with Biden's announcement, former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told Fox News Thursday night:
Chinese communist party, I mean, Xi Jinping must be laughing. When we rejoined the Paris climate accords, it was the biggest gift to the Chinese communist party that America has ever provided them. The chance that they'll actually honor any commitment that they make in some summit or international gathering today is precisely zero.
The United States will follow through on this. We'll destroy jobs. We'll destroy our economy. And these are the kinds of things that set America backwards and don't make us more secure.
Pompeo said everyone wants clean air and clean drinking water, but the green new deal isn't about those things -- it's about "power."

He said the Biden administration will bow to China, one of the worst carbon emitters in the world.

"And they're going to penalize good, hard-working Americans in that effort. It's a complete reverse of America First. They will put this climate change agenda, this progressive agenda ahead of everything, and that will make us here at home much more -- or much less secure."

Biden says his climate change plans will create millions of new "clean energy" jobs (while killing lucrative jobs in the oil and gas industry).

Vice President Kamala Harris, who introduced Biden at the Earth Day event, told the gathering:
Here, we believe tackling climate change, improving communities, and creating jobs can occur simultaneously. And we must recognize the importance, of justice in the work that we do that we do. The communities hardest hit by climate change are the same communities harmed by wealth and gender inequality, toxic air pollution, and so much more.
This truth holds around the world. So I urge you I urge all of us to focus on these communities, including indigenous communities, and consider their insight and experience in our efforts moving forward. They are critical leaders in this fight. Friends, the health of our communities, the well-being of our workers, and the strength of our economies depend on what we do now. And I can think of no one more committed to achieving our collective goals than President Joe Biden.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Counter Vatican Conference Will Expose Marxist Great Reset Agenda

April 22, 2021 by Elizabeth

A counter-Vatican conference “Truth Over Fear” will air live to combat the globalist “Great Reset” agenda being promoted by Pope Francis.

Rumble video on website 9:54 min
Patrick Coffin told War Room his online summit will expose the “tyranny in plain sight” surrounding the covid-19 pandemic.

“Our Conference Truth Over Fear is going to give you natural and supernatural immunity to the real virus summit, which is the one put on the Vatican

“It’s not just a garbage event they’re holding,” “Chelsea Clinton, Tony Fauci, the CEOs of Moderna and Pfizer, the noted virologist Joe Perry from the Aerosmith medical group. This is a rogues gallery of people on the wrong side of history.”

The conference will feature a Holocaust survivor, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, and others on the left, right, and center who will expose the tyranny the world faces.

“The evidence is coming in stronger and stronger every day that this was a pre-planned organized catastrophe,” Coffin said. “The ‘Great Reset’ organized by Klaus Schwab, another unelected oligarch.”

Coffin, an author and radio host, also organized a petition to cancel the Vatican conference, which features pro-abortion activists and a “who’s who of devils.”
Coffin said the “masked army” and constant propaganda are a “dress rehearsal for compliance with the vaccine.”

Coffin said he’s not afraid of being labeled a “conspiracy theorist” — the “Devil’s term du jour” for anyone who questions the narrative — because the evidence of the truth is all around.

“What matters is what’s happening in plain sight,” he said. “We have to isolate if we’re not sick. We have to wear a mask when it doesn’t stop you from getting sick.

Coffin said “massive Stockholm syndrome” is underway.

“It doesn’t matter what you think of the pre-planning [of the pandemic],” he said.

“It is unfolding. The vaccine passports are going to be arriving unless we the people push back.”

Coffin said the pivot from the “covid cult” to climate change and the “Greta Thunberg-ism” is already underway by the mainstream media, to promote fear and hysteria around climate change.
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
indeed true!

but the terribly concerning part is that the rather permanent political people are pushing this, the WEF is pushing this, global sized and global power level corporations are fully behind and pushing the CO2/Globalshit warming/Great Reset/and whatever else plans they cook up.
The autistic loudmouth little girls, the protestors, the greenie loonies, and most minions loudmouths are but distractions and unimportant to the end game. Really, when most auto mfgrs say they plan on most or all of their vehicles to be battery powered only by 20XX, and the dozens of other examples, you can take it to the bank that if you're around in 15 yrs whatever car you can by will be plug-in only.

They are delusional. Attempts at making fairy tales come true are going to frustrate them to no end. I pray against all of this very often, including guns being confiscated, which is wrong.

I pray that they don't have any of the "useless eaters"- us, or "cogs in the wheel," complying and helping them with their agenda, but instead will wake up and speak up.

That, and that everything they are trying to do to us, including decimation, be put back on to them and things, in the spirit realm and in the physical. The "unseen enemy" that Trump spoke about is directed energy weapons, i.e. 5G and smart meters, microwaves, crowd control weapons, causing covid symptoms and much more...it is not a virus.
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
Plants and trees can't survive without CO2, you sick, sick looking $^@!: Go crawl back into your hole and don't come out again.
 

Jubilee on Earth

Veteran Member

Doug Casey On The Shocking 2025 'Deagel' Forecast: War, Population Reduction, & The Collapse Of The West

WEDNESDAY, APR 21, 2021 - 09:40 PM
Via InternationalMan,com,

International Man: Deagel is a private online source for the military capabilities of the world’s nation-states. It recently released a shocking five-year forecast.

The report analyzes countries by projected population size, GDP, defense budget, and more.

In it, they predict a 70% reduction in the size of the United States population.

This is a bold prediction. What are your thoughts on this?


Doug Casey: I’ve got to say that I wasn’t familiar with Deagel - it keeps a low profile. Deagel is in the same business as Jane’s—which has been in the business of analyzing weapons systems for many decades.

A look at the Deagel website, which is quite sophisticated, makes it clear we’re not dealing with some blogger concocting outrageous clickbait. It seems to be well-connected with defense contractors and government agencies like the CIA.

They’ve predicted that about 70% of the US population, and about the same percentage in Europe, is going to disappear by 2025. It’s hard to believe that anybody in their position would make a forecast like that. There’s no logical business reason for it, especially since it was done before the COVID hysteria gripped the world. It stretches a reader’s credulity.

Could it possibly happen? It would be the biggest thing in world history. Does it have a basis in reality, or is it just some bizarre trolling exercise? I’m not sure—it’s hard to take almost anything from any source at face value these days.

But for the last several years, I’ve been saying that World War III would basically be a biological war. Of course, it will have substantial conventional, nuclear, space-based, and AI/computer elements as well, but its most serious component will be biological. Essentially, it will involve the use of bacteria and viruses to wipe out the enemy. The odds are that it will be between the US and China. But since anyone with a CRISPR in their garage can hack the genome and DNA of almost anything and anybody… there are no limits to the possibilities.

Certainly, from the Chinese point of view, a biological war makes all the sense in the world. That’s because the Han Chinese share a lot of genetic similarities. Presumably, a bacteria or virus can be bred to favor the Chinese and take out most everybody else. The fact is that anything that can be done eventually will be done. It’s just the law of large numbers.

Somebody might respond, “Well, that’s horribly racist.” Of course it’s racist.

Notwithstanding rational and philosophical arguments against it, all ethnic groups and countries are quite naturally racist. A fear of different racial and ethnic groups has been bred into humans, as a survival mechanism, over the hundreds of thousands of years since we became biologically modern.

All races and ethnic groups like to think that they’re “the best” or the most worthy, and that non-members are “other”, perhaps only marginally human.

Biological warfare plays directly into feeling.

Americans who—like everybody else—see themselves as “the good guys”, believe we’re immune to that. However, don’t forget that the US pioneered modern biowarfare. Fort Detrick, Maryland, has been an epicenter of it for over 70 years, and there are undoubtedly many other more clandestine sites where US government agencies are working on biological warfare. No doubt the Chinese and other major powers are working clandestinely as well. It’s not something anybody wants to advertise for many reasons.

What shocks me is not that a biowar is being researched or even actively wargamed, but that a connected organization like Deagel is actually saying it publicly. It’s not like what goes on in the spook community is an open book.

Deagel doesn’t explicitly say what, exactly, will cause the great die-off. But there are many advantages to biological warfare over other types of warfare, so it will probably be featured. It’s probably inevitable, now that the technology has made it practical.

What are the advantages of biowar? What might wargaming generals like about it?
  • First, it doesn’t destroy materiel. That’s a huge plus. After all, what’s the point of conquering a country if all you have to show for it is a smoking radioactive ruin? That’s the major advantage of the neutron bomb, of course; it kills the people but limits damage to buildings. Bioweapons essentially make atomic weapons obsolescent.
  • Second, bioweapons can be structured to attack only certain racial groups. That’s potentially either a big advantage or disadvantage to China. The diverse population of the US could also be either an advantage or a disadvantage, depending on who strikes first. But, on the bright side, you can perhaps immunize your own population, or at least the military and “essential” workers, to control the damage.
  • Third, bioweapons are very cheap and easy to fabricate. Anyone with access to a good high school chemistry lab is in business. There’s no need for expensive and tricky U-235 or, for that matter, any of the junk toys the Pentagon spends hundreds of billions on.
  • Fourth, bioweapons don’t need sophisticated delivery systems; again, no need for B-2s, B-52s, cruise missiles, ICBMs, or any of that. A sick tourist or two, or a few packages sent in the mail, can get the job done.
  • Fifth, bioweapons, whether they’re viruses or bacteria, not only offer plausible deniability but the potential to blame a third party. You can launch an attack, and nobody can really be sure who did it. Or even that an attack is, in fact, being launched.
There’s every advantage to biological warfare from an aggressor’s point of view. And, the aggressor doesn’t even have to be a nation-state, which is, of course, another excuse for governments to further clamp down on their populations, as COVID has shown. Guns are good self-defense weapons, and governments are trying to eliminate them; basement biowar labs are strictly offensive. Imagine the bureaucratic enforcement possibilities.

International Man: In addition, Deagel included a lengthy disclaimer, which states:

“After COVID, we can draw two major conclusions:
  1. The Western world success model has been built over societies with no resilience that can barely withstand any hardship, even a low-intensity one. It was assumed, but we got the full confirmation beyond any doubt.
  2. The COVID crisis will be used to extend the life of this dying economic system through the so-called Great Reset.”
Doug, you’ve written extensively about the economic, political, cultural, and social decline in the US—long before it became a popular topic of discussion.

Has anything changed in your perspective on the future of the US?

Doug Casey: No. I’m afraid the election of actual Bolsheviks in 2020—and I don’t use that term lightly—has sealed its fate. Not to mention that the nomenklatura in most major cities and states are cut from the same cloth.

In point of fact, the US is on such a self-destructive path that the Chinese don’t have to do anything in order to win. All they need to do is lay back and be quiet. The West is destroying itself.

As for this COVID crisis, it impresses me as 80% hysteria, a bad flu season that has been blown out of proportion. It’s well known (insofar as anything can be known, considering the abysmal quality of reporting and the extreme politicization of the issue) that COVID mainly affects the elderly, the sick, and the obese. The average age of descendants is 80; however, the ages of those who die are rarely mentioned. The media reports the number of COVID cases constantly, but that’s as meaningless as counting who gets a common cold. Anyway, aren’t all those who get infected become immune? A virus—like the Hong Kong flu, the Asian flu, the Bird flu, and the Swine flu—goes viral, then goes away. Even the Spanish flu, which was actually serious, came and went without destroying the economy. Nonetheless, the public has been so terrorized that they’re panicking to take potentially dangerous experimental injections. Even though there are numerous cheap drugs that can mitigate the virus after diagnosis, they’re never prescribed. The opinions of physicians and world-class scientists who differ with Fauci—an overpaid lifelong government employee—are actively suppressed. However, this is a whole different subject.

There is one thing I question about Deagel’s statement that you quoted: “The COVID crisis will be used to extend the life of this dying economic system through something called the Great Reset.” That’s a very odd statement because the crisis isn’t extending the life of the dying economic system. It’s putting the final nail in its coffin. It would be nice to hear how they figure that out, as COVID seems to be medically vastly overblown. The Great Reset has nothing to do with preserving the current economic system; it’s about formalizing a new one.

Here’s a wild and crazy thought. What if the real problem isn’t so much the COVID virus itself.

What if the real problem is the new vaccines. What if, after X number of months or years, they turn out to have very deadly effects? There’s a reason new drugs are tested over a period of years, which is far from the case here. Ted Turner, Bill Gates, and numerous others who think they’re “elite” have long said that the earth’s population ought to be reduced radically, perhaps by 80%. Is it too shocking to believe that some group would take advantage of this to cull the human population? It’s something that would be hard to believe even in a science fiction novel. But it now appears to be technically feasible. History is replete—overrun, actually—with psychos who try to destroy everybody once they get in power.

In point of fact, science fiction is a much better predictor of the future than any think tank has ever been. So maybe there’s a Dr. Evil at large, anxious to eliminate deplorables and other undesirables. If he exists, I doubt today’s woke transgender version of James Bond can counter him. Who knows where this is going? But it’s the wrong direction, and the trend is still accelerating.
International Man: The disclaimer in the Deagel report goes on to say,

Is the Western civilization seeing a confluence of crises coming together in a perfect storm?

Doug Casey: That’s a very good point. It seems like everything is starting to happen at once and at a hyperbolically accelerating rate. While the worlds of science and technology are approaching Ray Kurzweil’s utopian Singularity, the worlds of politics and sociology are approaching a dystopian anti-Singularity.

Let’s briefly look at the financial, economic, social, and political aspects of the potential collapse.

We’re absolutely en route to a gigantic financial crisis, featuring the destruction of the US dollar. And with it, the savings of a large percentage of the planet’s people will be impoverished because their savings are in dollars. Much of the value people thought they had in stocks, bonds, real estate, pensions, and insurance could disappear.

That’s bad enough, but what’s worse are the economic consequences. We’re likely to see wholesale unemployment, a collapse in business activity, and corporate bankruptcies, even while taxes go up radically. I’m increasingly of the opinion there will be a crack-up boom along the way; however, we might be entering that as we speak.

What’s even worse are the social ramifications, such as critical race theory, which emphasizes the differences between race groups, creating actual race hatred.

One consequence of the financial and economic upsets will be riots like those of 2020. The mass migration of people from alien cultures who don’t share Western values into the US and Europe is destabilizing. The US has, in fact, become a multicultural domestic empire.

The political consequences are evident. The Biden people in Washington, D.C. are exactly the same personality types who took over Russia in 1917 or France in 1789. They aren’t going to let go of the apparatus of power now that they’ve got it. They will find a way to re-install themselves in 2024.

What about the military? The US spends something like $1 trillion on defense annually, but nobody knows for certain. These budgets are complicated; military spending is hidden here, there, and everywhere. It doesn’t defend the United States; it just antagonizes foreigners. It’s also interesting that the Department of Defense is now trying to root out conservative political views from the rank-and-file soldiers.

But let’s get back to what could collapse the populations of North America and Europe by over 50%. Perhaps Deagel is anticipating a serious collapse of complex society because food won’t be grown, processed, and sent to cities. Maybe COVID is seen as just a catalyst. Most people in today’s highly urbanized world, from cubicle dwellers to ghetto rats, are incapable of surviving for more than a week if supply chains break.

International Man: The report also discusses a prediction regarding a potential war that involves Russia and China against the US.

What are your thoughts on this? Is it likely that we’ll see a conflict of this kind during the 2020s?

Doug Casey: As I said earlier, a war, at least with China, seems inevitable. It will likely be fomented by the US because, as the economy goes bad, governments always look for somebody else, an outsider, to blame.

At this point—and I recognize this will outrage jingoists and nationalists—the US government is actually the most dangerous force on the face of the planet. Much more dangerous than the Chinese, the Russians, or anybody else. Why? The US government is unique in actively and aggressively looking for trouble absolutely everywhere, sticking its nose into everything. Only the US has troops in a hundred other countries and is fighting hot wars in several more.

It’s said, for instance, that the Russians are aggressors because they may retake the Crimea and the Donbas region. Most Americans, who can’t even find these places on the map, are unaware that Crimea had been part of Russia since it was taken from the Ottomans in the 18th century and is mostly populated by ethnic Russians. Nikita Kruschev arbitrarily transferred it from the Russian SSR to the Ukrainian SSR in 1954 for personal political reasons shortly after Stalin’s death. The current problem started only after the US fomented a coup d’etat, a so-called color revolution, in Ukraine in 2014. It then made sense for Putin to retake it, much like the US tried to overthrow Castro after he ousted Batista.

In any event, it’s a problem between Russia and Ukraine and none of our business. The Biden regime butting in is somewhat analogous to Russia threatening war over the US owning Puerto Rico. We don’t need a serious war with Russia over nothing.

Taiwan is similar. Historically, it’s just a secessionist Chinese province—or not. Perhaps it’s a government in exile. But no matter; these are meaningless legalisms. Frankly, I’m on the side of Taiwan, but it’s none of our business whether they go to war with each other. US government intervention could easily start a conflict with China. It might end with the sinking of a couple of US carrier groups, or it might evolve into World War 3.

And, of course, we’re still in Afghanistan, Central Asia, and the Middle East. Plus Africa and God knows where else. The US is unnecessarily and stupidly whacking hornet’s nests everywhere in the world, bankrupting itself and making enemies, setting the stage for something really significant.
I think some of us have been familiar with that report for some time, and like the article writer said, it’s not just some blogger or tin foil hat wearer. This report has been on my mind as everyone around me is getting vaccinated. I can’t help thinking, “What if?” What if there are truly dire, deadly consequences to this vaccine? We would literally lose nearly everyone we know. I would venture to guess that when all is said and done, roughly 30% of the population would be about right for those who declined the vax.
 
Top