CORONA Main Coronavirus thread

inskanoot

Veteran Member
Back in the '80s I had bronchitis (got it every year in October/November and held on to it until May, when the weather warmed up.

Went to the local health food store and asked what was good for my condition.

The employee took me to a bottle of herbs called Chinese Lung Herbs. It was a bit pricey, but I was desperate.

It knocked the bronchitis right out of me.

Forward to the early 2000s and I went back to get another bottle. Couldn't find it. Asked an employee and she didn't have a clue what I was talking about.

Guess the FDA didn't like how well it worked. Couldn't find it on a Web search either. Very disappointed. Not surprised.

I take Vitamin D3, K-2, Magnesium Glycinate and Zinc on an almost daily basis (I've missed a couple of days this week) and haven't had bronchitis in almost three decades.
AI Overview



Natures's Sunshine Lung Support (Chinese) 100 VegCaps (Stock ...
You can find "Chinese Lung Herbs" by searching for specific brand-name formulations on major online marketplaces like Amazon, specialized TCM retailers such as ActiveHerb, Solstice Medicine Company, or Chinese Herbs Direct. Look for popular, trusted formulas like "Bai He Gu Jin Wan" (Lily Bulb Formula) or "ClearLungs".
ActiveHerbActiveHerb +3
Best Places to Find Chinese Lung Herbs:
  • Online Marketplaces: Amazon carries popular brands like Nature's Sunshine (Lung Support Chinese TCM), RidgeCrest Herbals (ClearLungs), and Dragon Herbs (Young Lungs).
  • Specialized TCM Retailers:
    • ActiveHerb: Offers formulas like LungVigor (Bai He Gu Jin Pian) and Breathmooth (Xuan Fei Ping Qi Pian).
    • Solstice Medicine Company: Stocks traditional formulas including Bai He Gu Jin Wan and Ching Fei Yi Huo Pien.
    • Chinese Herbs Direct: Features brands like Plum Flower and Min Shan.
  • Health Food Stores: Local health shops may carry these brands, particularly RidgeCrest ClearLungs.
Common "Lung Herb" Formulations:
  • Bai He Gu Jin Wan (Lily Bulb Formula): Often used for chronic coughing and lung nourishment.
  • ClearLungs (RidgeCrest): A popular formula based on Chinese medicine principles for respiratory health.
  • Qing Qi Hua Tan Wan: Known for clearing phlegm and supporting bronchial health.
  • Nature's Sunshine Lung Support (Chinese): A combination capsule focused on TCM principles.
Important Tips:
  • Verify Quality: Look for reputable, GMP-certified brands to ensure safety and purity.
  • Consult a Professional: Always speak with a licensed Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) practitioner or healthcare provider before beginning new supplements, especially if you have underlying conditions or are taking other medication.
 

inskanoot

Veteran Member
(fair use applies)


Magnetic Therapy Shows Promise for Long COVID Brain Fog
Nikhil Prasad Fact checked by:Thailand Medical News Team
Mar 25, 2026

A new clinical study is offering fresh hope to millions struggling with lingering brain fog after COVID-19, suggesting that a simple at-home magnetic therapy device could significantly improve memory, attention, and mood.

Researchers from the Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance and the Department of Medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, along with collaborators from Fareon, Inc, conducted a randomized controlled trial exploring a novel treatment called Microtesla Magnetic Therapy (MMT). Their findings point toward a safe, non-invasive approach that may tackle one of the most frustrating symptoms of long COVID—cognitive impairment.


Understanding Long COVID Brain Fog
Long COVID affects a significant portion of people even months after infection, with symptoms ranging from fatigue to memory problems. Cognitive impairment, often described as “brain fog,” can disrupt daily life, making it difficult to concentrate, process information, or recall simple details.

Scientists believe this condition is linked to ongoing inflammation in the brain, damage to blood vessels, and dysfunction in mitochondria, the energy-producing structures within cells. These issues create a cycle of reduced energy and persistent inflammation that affects brain performance.


How Magnetic Therapy Works
MMT is a wearable device that delivers very low-level radiofrequency magnetic fields to the brain. Unlike traditional brain stimulation therapies, it does not directly stimulate nerve cells but instead targets inflammation and cellular stress.
Participants in the study used the device at home for 15-minute sessions twice a week over four weeks. The therapy was designed to be simple, with remote monitoring ensuring correct usage.

In this Medical News report, the key innovation lies in the therapy’s ability to potentially reduce inflammation and oxidative stress in the brain—two major drivers of cognitive decline in long COVID patients.


Strong Improvements in Memory and Focus
The study involved 30 participants with moderate-to-severe cognitive symptoms linked to long COVID. They were divided into two groups: one receiving active therapy and the other a sham treatment.

By the eight-week mark, those using the active device showed statistically significant improvements in several cognitive tests. These included better working memory, improved verbal recall, and faster processing speed. For example, memory recall scores improved noticeably compared to the control group, and attention-related tasks also showed measurable gains.

Beyond the statistically significant outcomes, many other cognitive measures—including attention span, executive function, and processing speed—showed encouraging trends, suggesting broader benefits that may beco me clearer in larger studies.


Mood and Quality of Life Also Improve
Interestingly, the therapy did not just affect cognition. Participants reported better emotional well-being and reduced fatigue. Standardized assessments showed significant improvements in emotional health scores and a meaningful reduction in tiredness.

Depression and anxiety symptoms also improved, although these changes were not always statistically significant when compared to the control group. Still, the overall pattern indicates that the therapy may support both mental clarity and emotional stability.


Safe, Easy, and Highly Practical
One of the most striking findings was the safety and usability of the treatment. Participants completed 100 percent of their therapy sessions, and no device-related adverse effects were reported.

Users found the device comfortable and easy to operate, highlighting its potential for widespread home use. This is especially important for long COVID patients who may struggle with energy levels and mobility.


What This Means Moving Forward
While the study was relatively small, its findings are highly promising. The improvements in cognition and mood, combined with the absence of side effects, suggest that MMT could become a valuable tool in managing long COVID symptoms.

However, researchers caution that larger trials are needed to confirm these results and better understand how the therapy works at a biological level.


Conclusion
This study highlights a potentially game-changing approach to treating long COVID brain fog. By targeting inflammation and cellular dysfunction rather than simply masking symptoms, Microtesla Magnetic Therapy offers a new direction in recovery. Its ease of use, safety, and early signs of effectiveness make it particularly appealing for long-term management. If future studies confirm these findings, this technology could significantly improve quality of life for millions still struggling with the cognitive aftermath of COVID-19.

The study findings were published on a preprint server and are currently being peer reviewed.
This reminded me of Hulda Clark’s low intensity frequency therapy, the Zapper.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


Exclusive-Pfizer, BioNTech Halt US COVID Vaccine Study After Recruitment Struggles

by Bhanvi Satija - Reuters
April 1, 2026, at 11:39 a.m.

LONDON, April 1 (Reuters) - Vaccine makers Pfizer and BioNTech halted a large U.S. trial of their updated COVID-19 vaccine in healthy adults aged 50 to 64, saying enrollment in the trials had been too low to generate the needed data.

In a letter to trial investigators dated March 30, seen by Reuters and previously unreported, Pfizer said it would stop surveillance for signs of COVID illness for all participants in the study after April 3.

Enrollment was closed on March 6, following a review of current epidemiological trends, it said.

The move comes as COVID vaccine makers grapple with pushback from the U.S. administration and weak U.S. demand for the shots.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration toughened requirements for COVID vaccine use last year, including asking for large, placebo-controlled trials in the 50-64 age group for it to be included in recommendations.

Pfizer and BioNTech told Reuters they had informed the FDA about their intent to halt the COVID-19 vaccine study, citing challenges getting enough participants. The target enrollment was roughly 25,000 to 30,000 participants.

"This study is not ending as a result of any safety or benefit-risk concerns. We intend to stop the study due to slow enrollment and therefore the inability to generate relevant post-marketing data," the companies said.

Shares of Pfizer and rival COVID-vaccine maker Moderna were up nearly 1%, while U.S.-listed shares of BioNTech rose about 2%.

FDA vaccine chief Vinay Prasad, who had pushed for the placebo-controlled trials in healthy adults and children, is leaving the agency this month. Experts warned that requiring large new trials could delay or limit the availability of updated shots for lower-risk groups.

It was unclear what the path to approval could be for this group. The FDA was not immediately available for comment. The companies did not comment on plans for marketing the shot for this age group.

The Pfizer-BioNTech study halt comes ahead of an expected May meeting of the FDA's Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, which would use study data to guide decisions on strain selection for COVID vaccines this autumn.

"Without the data, there probably just won't be a presentation," said Dr. Jesse Goodman, a former FDA chief scientist. "And without the presentation, there may not be a specific approval for this age group."

A DIFFICULT POPULATION TO RECRUIT

Two sources from companies that manage 18 of the 208 trial sites, said Pfizer told them in writing in early March to stop recruitment.

The trial aimed to test the efficacy, immune response and safety of an updated COVID vaccine from Pfizer and BioNTech in healthy adults aged 50 to 64. The FDA required participants have no chronic conditions such as hypertension or diabetes.

"This is a very difficult population to recruit," said one executive at a contract research organization involved in the trial, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

"Even when patients are willing to participate in COVID studies, more than 80% fail at pre-screening because they don't meet the health criteria. It's been a real challenge to enroll enough patients, particularly given the scale of these trials," the executive said.

MODERNA TRIAL GOES ON; COVID-SHOT DEMAND PLUNGES

Currently, no COVID-19 vaccines have full FDA approval for healthy adults aged 50 to 64. Pfizer and BioNTech's Comirnaty and Moderna's Spikevax and next-generation mNEXSPIKE are approved for adults aged 65 and older, as well as for younger people who are at higher risk of severe COVID-19.

Moderna is running a similar U.S. study with an aim to enroll 30,000 volunteers, and is also facing recruitment challenges, sources at four sites said. That study is expected to be completed in June 2027. Moderna did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.

COVID vaccines remain significant products for their makers, though demand has fallen sharply from pandemic peaks.

Only about 18% of Americans received a COVID booster during the 2025–26 season, according to data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, even as the virus continues to cause tens of thousands of deaths each year, including an estimated 8,000 to 12,000 among adults aged 50 to 64.

Updated COVID vaccines for approved groups are typically cleared based on immune response data showing how well a new formulation generated antibodies against circulating variants, similar to the agency's approach for annual flu shots.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhFJ9ZSc--g
Pfizer Just SHUT DOWN Their Massive COVID Booster Trial — Here’s Why
Vejon Health
Apr 3 2026
11 min 48 sec

Pfizer and BioNTech just pulled the plug on their huge placebo-controlled trial for the 2025–2026 COVID booster in healthy 50- to 64-year-olds. The study was supposed to enroll over 25,000 people — but they couldn’t even get close. What happened? Over 80% of volunteers were turned away at pre-screening because they had common conditions like hypertension or diabetes.

This wasn’t a safety issue — the companies were crystal clear about that. Instead, it exposes a major clash between the FDA’s tough new 2025 rules and real-world reality. In this video we break down exactly why the trial collapsed, what the FDA now demands from vaccine makers, and what it means for future boosters. If you’re in your 50s or 60s and wondering about the latest shot, you need to watch this.
 

Signwatcher

Has No Life - Lives on TB
AI Overview



View attachment 595810
You can find "Chinese Lung Herbs" by searching for specific brand-name formulations on major online marketplaces like Amazon, specialized TCM retailers such as ActiveHerb, Solstice Medicine Company, or Chinese Herbs Direct. Look for popular, trusted formulas like "Bai He Gu Jin Wan" (Lily Bulb Formula) or "ClearLungs".
View attachment 595811ActiveHerb +3
Best Places to Find Chinese Lung Herbs:
  • Online Marketplaces: Amazon carries popular brands like Nature's Sunshine (Lung Support Chinese TCM), RidgeCrest Herbals (ClearLungs), and Dragon Herbs (Young Lungs).
  • Specialized TCM Retailers:
    • ActiveHerb: Offers formulas like LungVigor (Bai He Gu Jin Pian) and Breathmooth (Xuan Fei Ping Qi Pian).
    • Solstice Medicine Company: Stocks traditional formulas including Bai He Gu Jin Wan and Ching Fei Yi Huo Pien.
    • Chinese Herbs Direct: Features brands like Plum Flower and Min Shan.
  • Health Food Stores: Local health shops may carry these brands, particularly RidgeCrest ClearLungs.
Common "Lung Herb" Formulations:
  • Bai He Gu Jin Wan (Lily Bulb Formula): Often used for chronic coughing and lung nourishment.
  • ClearLungs (RidgeCrest): A popular formula based on Chinese medicine principles for respiratory health.
  • Qing Qi Hua Tan Wan: Known for clearing phlegm and supporting bronchial health.
  • Nature's Sunshine Lung Support (Chinese): A combination capsule focused on TCM principles.
Important Tips:
  • Verify Quality: Look for reputable, GMP-certified brands to ensure safety and purity.
  • Consult a Professional: Always speak with a licensed Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) practitioner or healthcare provider before beginning new supplements, especially if you have underlying conditions or are taking other medication.

THANK YOU!!
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


Annexin A1 Protein May Boost COVID-19 Recovery and Survival
Nikhil Prasad Fact checked by:Thailand Medical News Team
Mar 30, 2026


Breakthrough insight into how the body heals from severe infection
A new scientific study has uncovered a promising biological pathway that may help patients recover from severe COVID-19, offering fresh hope for improving treatment outcomes. Researchers found that a naturally occurring protein called annexin A1 plays a key role in calming harmful inflammation and aiding recovery in hospitalized patients.


What scientists set out to investigate
The research team analyzed blood samples from 61 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, ranging from severe to critically ill cases, including those requiring life support such as mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). These patients were compared with 23 healthy individuals.

The study was conducted by scientists from multiple institutions, including Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto (FMUP), Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de São João (CHUSJ), Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto, i3S—Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Instituto Nacional de Saúde Doutor Ricardo Jorge, and NOVA Medical School, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa. Their goal was to understand how annexin A1 and its receptor, known as FPR2, behave during COVID-19 infection and whether they influence disease severity or recovery.


Key findings reveal a recovery-linked protein
At the time of hospital admission, levels of annexin A1 were significantly higher in all COVID-19 patients compared to healthy individuals. This suggests that the body rapidly activates this protein in response to infection.

More importantly, researchers observed that annexin A1 levels continued to rise over time in patients who survived, especially during the later stages of hospitalization. In contrast, patients who did not survive showed lower levels of this protein in the later weeks.

This Medical News report highlights that annexin A1 appears to be closely linked with recovery, suggesting it may help the body resolve inflammation and repair tissue damage caused by the virus.


Understanding the role of inflammation control
COVID-19 is known to trigger excessive inflammation, often referred to as a “cytokine storm,” which can damage organs and worsen outcomes. Annexin A1 belongs to a group of molecules called pro-resolving mediators, which help switch off inflammation once it has served its purpose.

The study found that annexin A1 worked in coordination with another molecule called resolvin E1, both of which are involved in calming inflammation. Higher annexin A1 levels were also linked to reduced signs of blood vessel damage, a major complication in severe COVID-19 cases.

Interestingly, although most patients were treated with dexamethasone, a standard anti-inflammatory drug, the amount of the drug given did not appear to directly influence annexin A1 levels. This suggests the body may regulate this protein independently as part of its natural healing process.


Stable receptor but active signaling pathway
The researchers also examined FPR2, the receptor that annexin A1 binds to in order to exert its effects. While FPR2 levels were elevated in COVID-19 patients compared to healthy individuals, they remained relatively stable throughout hospitalization. This indicates that while the receptor is present and ready, the key changes driving recovery may depend more on the availability and activity of annexin A1 itself.


Why this discovery matters
These findings shed light on a crucial but previously underexplored mechanism in COVID-19 recovery. By enhancing the body’s ability to resolve inflammation rather than simply suppressing it, annexin A1 could represent a new therapeutic target.

Future treatments might focus on boosting this pathway to improve survival rates and reduce complications in critically ill patients.


Conclusion
Overall, the study provides compelling evidence that annexin A1 is not just a bystander but an active player in the recovery process from severe COVID-19. Its increasing levels in survivors, association with reduced inflammation, and interaction with other healing molecules point to a protective and restorative role. Targeting this pathway could lead to more effective therapies that support the body’s natural ability to heal while minimizing harmful inflammation.

The study findings were published in the peer reviewed journal: Biomolecules.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

EMPHASIS MINE


New COVID-19 Drug Cuts Death Risk by Up to 65 Percent
Nikhil Prasad Fact checked by:Thailand Medical News Team
Apr 01, 2026

A large new real-world study from the Czech Republic is drawing global attention after revealing that a long-used immune-boosting drug may significantly reduce deaths from COVID-19. The medication, called inosine pranobex, has been around for decades, but researchers now say it could play a much bigger role in fighting viral infections than previously thought.


A Massive Nationwide Study Offers New Insights

The research analyzed health records from more than 4.6 million COVID-19 patients across the Czech Republic between 2020 and 2023. After careful matching of patients based on age, sex, underlying health conditions, vaccination status, and treatments received, the final analysis included over 67,000 patients treated with inosine pranobex and more than 135,000 comparable individuals who did not receive the drug.

The study was conducted by scientists from the Third Faculty of Medicine at Charles University in Prague, the Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, the Institute for Postgraduate Medical Education in Prague, and an independent researcher.

What makes this study particularly important is its scale and real-world data. Unlike smaller clinical trials, this research reflects how treatments actually perform across an entire population.


Significant Drop in Death Rates
The findings were striking. During the earlier phase of the pandemic, before the Omicron variant became dominant, patients who received inosine pranobex had a death rate of 1.65 percent compared to 2.11 percent in those who did not receive it. This translates to a 22 percent reduction in mortality.

The benefits appeared even stronger during the Omicron period. Patients treated with the drug had a death rate of just 0.13 percent, compared to 0.35 percent in the control group. That represents a remarkable 65 percent reduction in mortality risk.

Even more impressive, the effect was strongest among patients who did not receive other advanced COVID-19 treatments such as antivirals or monoclonal antibodies. In that subgroup, the reduction in death risk reached as high as 78 percent in some analyses.


How the Drug Works in the Body
Scientists believe inosine pranobex works through several mechanisms. It enhances the activity of natural killer cells, which are crucial for identifying and destroying virus-infected cells. It also stimulates T-cells and boosts the body’s immune signaling, helping the immune system respond faster and more effectively.

Additionally, the drug appears to interfere with viral replication, slowing down the virus’s ability to multiply inside the body. These combined effects may explain why patients receiving the treatment showed better outcomes.

According to details highlighted in the study, the drug also demonstrated a strong safety profile, with very few adverse events reported and no deaths linked to its use.


Real World Effectiveness and Accessibility

This Medical News report highlights that one of the most compelling aspects of inosine pranobex is its accessibility. Unlike newer antiviral drugs that can be expensive or limited in availability, this medication is relatively affordable and widely available in many countries.

Researchers also pointed out that the drug could be particularly valuable in settings where access to advanced COVID-19 therapies is limited or delayed. It may also have potential for early treatment or even preventive use following exposure to the virus.


Limitations and What Comes Next
Despite the promising findings, researchers caution that the study has limitations. It did not include detailed data on patients’ symptoms at the start of infection or results from diagnostic imaging and lab tests. It also did not account for all possible medications or supportive treatments patients may have received.

Still, the consistency of the results across different groups and time periods strengthens the overall conclusions. The researchers emphasize that further clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings and explore additional uses, including potential benefits in long COVID or future viral outbreaks.


Conclusion
The growing body of evidence suggests that inosine pranobex could be a valuable tool in reducing COVID-19 mortality, especially in patients who lack access to advanced treatments. Its ability to enhance immune response, combined with its safety and affordability, makes it a promising candidate for broader use.

However, more rigorous clinical trials are essential before it can be fully integrated into global treatment guidelines, ensuring that its benefits are confirmed and its optimal use clearly defined.

The study findings were published in the peer reviewed International Journal of Infectious Diseases.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


The Virus Has No Big Hands Left to Play, But Could Still Drive Meaningful Waves? Hmmm...
Geert Vanden Bossche

Apr 05, 2026

The title captures how some folks interpret the current SARS-CoV-2 evolutionary dynamics - especially those of BA.3.2. There is a peculiar contradiction emerging in current discussions on viral evolution. On the one hand, some argue that SC-2 has essentially exhausted its repertoire of impactful evolutionary moves–that the virus has ‘no big hands left to play.’ On the other hand, those same voices concede that ongoing antigenic changes can still accumulate and generate what they call ‘meaningful waves’:

Michael@mrmickme2​
Despite the hype on here and in some media publications — it doesn’t appear as though BA.3.2 (Cicada) is having any significant impact in driving infection numbers. Cov is apparently struggling against people’s widespread, prior exposure. Maybe no big hands left to play?​
Denis - The COVID info guy - @BigBadDenis​
USA: Epidemic trend summary: April 3, 2026​
COVID-19​
As of March 31, 2026:​
0 states have COVID-19 infections growing or likely growing​
32 states has infections declining or likely declining​
11 states show no change​


Michael@mrmickme2​
@GVDBossche The virus now seems to be selected for frequent, incremental antigenic changes rather than large jumps, though these can clearly still stack over time and drive meaningful waves.​


Both statements cannot be true at the same time!

If viral evolution were truly reduced to small, incremental antigenic adjustments with limited individual impact, then the epidemiological consequences should likewise be modest. Minor changes yield minor effects. That is the very definition of incrementalism. Yet, the notion of ‘meaningful waves’ implies something entirely different. At the population level, a wave becomes ‘meaningful’ only when there is a substantial increase in viral fitness, whether through enhanced intrinsic transmissibility, immune evasion or pathogenic interaction (virulence) with the host. Such outcomes are not the linear sum of trivial changes; they reflect non-linear dynamics within the evolutionary landscape.

This brings us to a fundamental principle of evolutionary biology:

When a system operates under increasing constraint, adaptive progress through small, independent steps becomes progressively inefficient. The marginal fitness gain of individual mutations diminishes, especially in a highly COVID-19-vaccinated host population shaped by widespread prior exposure and converging immune pressure.

So how, then, can the virus continue to produce ‘meaningful waves’?

There are only two logically consistent answers.

Either these waves are not truly meaningful–mere statistical noise dressed up as significance–or they arise from cooperative interactions between Spike (S)-associated mutations, where combinations of changes produce effects that far exceed the sum of their parts. The latter is not speculation. It is a well-established evolutionary mechanism known as epistasis. As previously explained, the phenotypic effect of currently observed S-associated mutations likely arises from sterically mediated interactions among them (Plausibility of more extended O-glycosylation as last resort for SARS-CoV-2 immune escape). I call it ‘steric epistasis.’

And here lies the key of all misinterpretation related to the ongoing evolutionary dynamics of SC-2 in highly COVID-19-vaccinated populations. Such sterically mediated interactions are precisely what enables qualitative shifts in phenotype (Everyone knows a pus-filled abscess will eventually burst. However, nothing is more difficult than predicting exactly when it will burst...). Epistasis largely explains how evolution crosses fitness valleys and reaches new adaptive peaks. It is how systems transition, not gradually, but abruptly, into new regimes of behavior.

In other words, what is being described as ‘stacking over time’ is, in reality, the precondition for a functional jump. Calling it incremental does not make it so.

Moreover, the discussion is often artificially narrowed to amino acid substitutions, as if changes in amino acid sequences alone define the virus’s adaptive potential. This overlooks a critical and far more flexible layer of viral evolution: the glycosylation landscape of the S protein.

Glycosylation is not merely decorative. It is functionally decisive. Changes in glycan shielding can alter antigenicity, modulate receptor accessibility, and reshape interactions with the host immune system–all without requiring extensive sequence divergence. These modifications provide the virus with a powerful means of reconfiguring its phenotype under immune pressure (Scientific Summary (4 pp.) on 'Plausibility of more extended O-glycosylation as a last resort for SARS-CoV-2 immune escape')..

Importantly, such changes are inherently non-linear in their effects. A shift in glycosylation pattern can abruptly transform how the immune system perceives and handles the virus or....how the virus gets a handle on the host immune system! This is not gradual drift; it is reorganization at the interface between virus and host.

So the idea that the virus can indefinitely ‘struggle’ against widespread immunity through marginal gains is not biologically plausible.

Evolution under constraint does not proceed through endless fine-tuning. When incremental pathways lose efficiency, systems tend to reorganize–sometimes suddenly. This is not an exception to evolutionary rules. It is a consequence of them.

Which brings us back to the original claim. To assert that the virus has ‘no big hands left to play,’ while simultaneously acknowledging the emergence of ‘meaningful waves,’ is not a nuanced position. It is an internally inconsistent one. If the waves are real, then so is the mechanism behind them. And that mechanism, by definition, involves the potential for non-linear, qualitative change.

In evolutionary terms, the game is not over. It is, in fact, highly likely of approaching a turning point.
 

Plain Jane

Just Plain Jane

Big Pharma Forced To Yank COVID Vaxx Study Due To Lack Of Participants​

by Tyler Durden
Monday, Apr 06, 2026 - 02:40 PM
Authored by Ben Sellers via Headline USA,
Two of the major pharmaceutical companies connected with the controversial COVID vaccines were forced to abandon a new research study after failing to garner enough participants.

Pfizer and German vax maker BioNTech had sought to research an updated version of the vaccine in adults ages 50 to 64, but were unable to generate the data needed due to the low enrollment in the trials, Reuters reported.

The study was needed in order to meet new guidelines imposed by the Food and Drug Administration that require the pharmaceutical companies to provide data on the efficacy of the vaccine in comparison with a placebo.

However, it marks a peculiar coda to the pandemic era, when mass formation psychosis swept the globe forcing individuals to forgo their civil liberties en masse and to inject the experimental, gene-altering serum into their DNA under extreme social duress.

Since then, vaccine injuries including strokes, myocarditis, turbo cancers and miscarriages have all been linked, either clinically or anecdotally, to the drugs, which were fast-tracked by the FDA under the previous Trump and Biden administrations with backing from dubious medical authorities like COVID czar Anthony Fauci.

In addition to the potential harm the caused, others have noted that the vaccines had little benefit since they did not prevent transmission of the COVID virus.

The pandemic ultimately dissipated as the result of natural immunity and evolution, with weaker variants rendering the vaccines unnecessary and redundant.

The stricter FDA guidelines under current Health and Human Services Sec. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. stand in stark contrast with the early days of the Biden presidency, when Kennedy’s far-left counterpart, Xavier Becerra, oversaw unconstitutional mandates pressuring government workers and various private industries to submit to the demands of Big Pharma.

Jeffrey Tucker, president of the Brownstone Institute — a nonprofit that sprung up in opposition to vaccine mandates and other COVID-era hysteria — said the recent fizzling of Pfizer offered a long-awaited dose of poetic justice.

Jeffrey A Tucker

@jeffreytucker

Essentially, the market itself is taking the Covid shots off the market. It amounts to a humiliating repudiation of one of history's largest and most destructive inoculation attempts. A fitting end to a hideous story.
https://t.co/jsanIQooyC

From reuters.com
9:44 AM · Apr 2, 2026
·
291.2K
Views


View: https://twitter.com/jeffreytucker/status/2039700383644205456?


Essentially, the market itself is taking the Covid shots off the market,” Tucker wrote in an X post.

“It amounts to a humiliating repudiation of one of history’s largest and most destructive inoculation attempts. A fitting end to a hideous story.”
 

Tristan

TB Fanatic

Big Pharma Forced To Yank COVID Vaxx Study Due To Lack Of Participants​

by Tyler Durden
Monday, Apr 06, 2026 - 02:40 PM
Authored by Ben Sellers via Headline USA,
Two of the major pharmaceutical companies connected with the controversial COVID vaccines were forced to abandon a new research study after failing to garner enough participants.

Pfizer and German vax maker BioNTech had sought to research an updated version of the vaccine in adults ages 50 to 64, but were unable to generate the data needed due to the low enrollment in the trials, Reuters reported.

The study was needed in order to meet new guidelines imposed by the Food and Drug Administration that require the pharmaceutical companies to provide data on the efficacy of the vaccine in comparison with a placebo.

However, it marks a peculiar coda to the pandemic era, when mass formation psychosis swept the globe forcing individuals to forgo their civil liberties en masse and to inject the experimental, gene-altering serum into their DNA under extreme social duress.

Since then, vaccine injuries including strokes, myocarditis, turbo cancers and miscarriages have all been linked, either clinically or anecdotally, to the drugs, which were fast-tracked by the FDA under the previous Trump and Biden administrations with backing from dubious medical authorities like COVID czar Anthony Fauci.

In addition to the potential harm the caused, others have noted that the vaccines had little benefit since they did not prevent transmission of the COVID virus.

The pandemic ultimately dissipated as the result of natural immunity and evolution, with weaker variants rendering the vaccines unnecessary and redundant.

The stricter FDA guidelines under current Health and Human Services Sec. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. stand in stark contrast with the early days of the Biden presidency, when Kennedy’s far-left counterpart, Xavier Becerra, oversaw unconstitutional mandates pressuring government workers and various private industries to submit to the demands of Big Pharma.

Jeffrey Tucker, president of the Brownstone Institute — a nonprofit that sprung up in opposition to vaccine mandates and other COVID-era hysteria — said the recent fizzling of Pfizer offered a long-awaited dose of poetic justice.

Jeffrey A Tucker
@jeffreytucker

Essentially, the market itself is taking the Covid shots off the market. It amounts to a humiliating repudiation of one of history's largest and most destructive inoculation attempts. A fitting end to a hideous story.
https://t.co/jsanIQooyC

From reuters.com
9:44 AM · Apr 2, 2026
·
291.2K
Views

View: https://twitter.com/jeffreytucker/status/2039700383644205456?


Essentially, the market itself is taking the Covid shots off the market,”
Tucker wrote in an X post.

“It amounts to a humiliating repudiation of one of history’s largest and most destructive inoculation attempts. A fitting end to a hideous story.”

Hideous, indeed.

Barely scratches the surface.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
Let this post die , I hate being reminded of the stupidity.
Please put me on ignore, that way you won't see the thread when you sign on as just skipping it will still remind you of COVID, which was not stupid, ask those of us who lost loved ones to it. Ignoring me as the poster of it will block you from ever having to see the thread title while you are signed on, that's a much better way of avoiding it. I will do the same for you.

HD
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
Geert doesn't even recognize Covid 19 as a bio-weapon so his prognostications treating this as a normal virus won't work... imho.

Good point. I don't think that negates all of his predictions but I do think it explains why they've been off time-wise. If this had been a natural virus vs. one created in a lab, his predictions would've probably been more accurate.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


New Study Finds 35 Percent Higher Heart Failure Risk Up to 25 Months After COVID-19 Exposure
Nikhil Prasad Fact checked by:Thailand Medical News Team
Apr 02, 2026


Medical News: Post-COVID Heart Risk Shock Emerges in New Study
A major new analysis has revealed a troubling long-term consequence of COVID-19 recovery - an increased risk of developing heart failure months after the initial infection has passed. The findings, drawn from a large-scale review of global data, suggest that surviving COVID-19 does not necessarily mean escaping its lasting effects on the heart.


A Hidden Threat After Recovery

Researchers conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis involving more than 400,000 COVID-19 survivors across multiple countries. The study found that individuals who had recovered from the virus faced a 35 percent higher risk of developing new-onset heart failure compared to those who were never infected.

This risk persisted for up to 25 months after recovery, highlighting that the virus may leave behind silent but serious damage. Even individuals who experienced mild symptoms during their initial infection were not completely spared, as subtle heart dysfunction was detected in some cases.


Who Is Most at Risk?
The study identified certain groups as particularly vulnerable. Immunocompromised individuals, especially kidney transplant recipients, showed the highest risk - more than double compared to the general population. Younger adults under the age of 65 also demonstrated a surprisingly elevated risk, challenging the assumption that only older individuals face long-term complications.

Interestingly, the data also showed that while COVID-19 increases heart failure risk, other severe respiratory infections like influenza and pneumonia may carry similar or even greater risks. This suggests that the heart may be broadly vulnerable after major lung infections, not just COVID-19.


What Is Happening Inside the Heart?
Scientists believe the damage is caused by a combination of factors. The virus can directly invade heart cells, disrupt normal blood vessel function, and trigger prolonged inflammation. Over time, this can lead to scarring of heart tissue and reduced ability of the heart to pump effectively.

Another key finding was the presence of subclinical heart damage, meaning early-stage dysfunction that may not produce noticeable symptoms. Advanced imaging studies revealed reduced heart muscle strain, which is often a warning sign of future heart failure.


Important Insights from the Study
This Medical News report highlights a crucial shift in how doctors and health systems must approach COVID-19 recovery. Rather than viewing recovery as the end of illness, experts now emphasize the need for ongoing cardiovascular monitoring, especially during the first year after infection.

Routine screening using biomarkers such as NT-proBNP and cardiac troponin may help detect early heart stress before symptoms develop . This approach could allow for earlier treatment and better long-term outcomes.


Study Strengths and Global Collaboration

The research was conducted by scientists from multiple institutions, including the Doctoral School and Faculty of Medicine at Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy in Timisoara, Romania; the Clinical Hospital of Infectious Diseases and Pulmonology “Victor Babes” in Timisoara, Romania; the Center for Research and Innovation in Personalized Medicine of Respiratory Diseases in Timisoara, Romania; the Department of Diabetes at “Pius Brinzeu” Emergency Hospital in Timisoara, Romania; and the Second Department of Internal Medicine at Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy.

Their analysis included data from major international registries such as the U.S. Veterans Affairs database, the National COVID Cohort Collaborative, and population studies from Singapore, Norway, Germany, Spain, and Canada.


Conclusions
The findings clearly show that COVID-19 is not just a short-term respiratory illness but a condition with potentially serious long-term cardiovascular consequences. The increased risk of heart failure - even among younger and previously healthy individuals - signals the need for a more proactive and personalized approach to post-COVID care. While not everyone will develop complications, the evidence strongly supports ongoing monitoring, early screening, and targeted interventions for high-risk groups to prevent a future wave of chronic heart disease linked to the pandemic.

The study findings were published in the peer reviewed Journal of Clinical Medicine.
 

Tristan

TB Fanatic
That’s why we need this!!

A TON of work has gone into this thread and HD has carried the load!!

Forgive in advance the thread drift...

There's a scene in "Excalibur" that is all too poignant. Merlin says: "For it is the Doom of Men that they Forget."

I never used to believe it, not for the big things at least; yet we see evidence of it here on TB all the time.
People want to forget.

Thanks again, HD and everyone else, who've made such efforts to to assure that not everyone will forget.
 

naegling62

Veteran Member
Good point. I don't think that negates all of his predictions but I do think it explains why they've been off time-wise. If this had been a natural virus vs. one created in a lab, his predictions would've probably been more accurate.
HD you are greatly appreciated just like DB and many more who keep up the hard work on certain long running threads.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


Study on COVID-19 Infection Versus COVID-19 Vaccines Reveal Hidden Immune Differences
Nikhil Prasad Fact checked by:Thailand Medical News Team
Apr 02, 2026


Medical News: Scientists Discover Surprising Immune System Differences
A groundbreaking new study has revealed that the human immune system responds very differently to COVID-19 infection compared to vaccination, challenging long-held assumptions about how protection develops. Researchers analyzed detailed immune responses in over 250 individuals, uncovering subtle yet important changes that could reshape how scientists understand immunity.

The research was conducted by scientists from the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Roche Sequencing Solutions, the Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard, and associated departments including Clinical Pathology, Radiology, Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Clinical Informatics.


What the Study Looked At
Instead of only measuring antibodies, the team examined both antibodies and T cells - the two major arms of the immune system. They used advanced sequencing techniques to analyze immune cell receptors, focusing on tiny regions known as CDR3 that help recognize viruses.

A total of 251 individuals were studied, including vaccinated individuals, people who had been infected with COVID-19, and control subjects. The researchers also measured neutralizing antibodies, which are considered a key indicator of protection against the virus.


Vaccines and Infection Produce Different Immune Patterns
One of the most striking findings was that vaccination and infection influence immune cells in different ways. Vaccinated individuals tended to produce antibodies with shorter key receptor regions, while infected individuals showed different patterns altogether.

Even more surprising, when scientists looked at “non-functional” immune cells - cells not actively producing antibodies - they found the opposite trend. These cells actually had longer receptor regions in vaccinated individuals.

This suggests that vaccines may influence the immune system earlier than expected, even before immune cells are fully activated and selected.


Age Affects Vaccine Response but Not Infection
Another important discovery was the role of age. The study found that older individuals produced lower levels of protective antibodies after vaccination. However, age did not significantly affect antibody levels in those who were infected.

This means that natural infection may trigger a more consistent immune response across age groups, while vaccine responses may weaken with age.


A Larger Portion of the Immune System Is Involved
The researchers also discovered that vaccination may affect a surprisingly large portion of the immune system. Their analysis suggests that at least one-sixth of the immune cell repertoire is influenced by vaccination. This is far greater than previously believed, as most scientists assumed only a small fraction of immune cells respond to a specific virus.


T Cells Play a Key Role in Protection
The study also highlighted the importance of T cells, especially a type called CD4 T cells. Individuals with more SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells tended to have higher levels of protective antibodies.

However, identifying these protective patterns is not simple. The immune response was found to be “diffuse,” meaning it is spread out across many different cells rather than concentrated in a few dominant ones.


New Methods Improve Immune Tracking
To better understand immune responses, researchers tested different analytical methods. They found that a newer approach called “binding capacity” was more reliable than traditional matching techniques.

This method allows scientists to detect broader immune patterns, even when exact matches to known virus-fighting cells are rare.


Why These Findings Matter
This Medical News report highlights that immunity to COVID-19 is far more complex than previously thought. The immune system does not respond in a simple or uniform way. Instead, it shows a wide range of subtle changes depending on whether a person is vaccinated or infected.

These findings could have major implications for vaccine design, booster strategies, and future pandemic preparedness.


Conclusion

In conclusion, this study reveals that COVID-19 vaccination and natural infection trigger distinct and unexpectedly complex immune responses involving both antibodies and T cells. The discovery that vaccines may influence early immune cell development and affect a larger portion of the immune system than previously believed challenges existing models of immunity. Additionally, the impact of age on vaccine-induced protection underscores the need for tailored strategies. Overall, these findings deepen scientific understanding and could guide the development of more effective vaccines and diagnostic tools in the future.

The study findings were published in the peer reviewed journal: PLOS One.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
We discussed fluvoxamine very early in this thread. Of course the scientific community dismissed it at the time. Nice to see it being accepted now.


(fair use applies)


Widely Available Drug Found To Ease One of Long COVID’s Most Stubborn Symptoms
By McMaster University
April 1, 20261

An established drug shows unexpected promise against long COVID fatigue.

A widely used antidepressant may offer unexpected relief for one of long COVID’s most stubborn symptoms. In a new clinical trial, researchers found that fluvoxamine can significantly reduce persistent fatigue, a condition that continues to disrupt daily life for millions worldwide.

The study, led in part by McMaster University, adds to growing efforts to repurpose existing medications for long COVID, a complex condition that still lacks clearly effective treatments. Because fluvoxamine is already approved, inexpensive, and broadly available, the findings could move quickly from research into real-world care.

The findings were published in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

Fatigue is not just a lingering inconvenience. For many patients, it is the defining feature of long COVID, often described as overwhelming exhaustion that does not improve with rest. Scientists believe it may be linked to ongoing inflammation, immune system disruption, or changes in brain signaling, though no single cause has been confirmed.

“This is an important step forward for patients who have been desperate for evidence-based options,” says Edward Mills, senior author, professor in McMaster’s Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, and co-principal investigator of the trial. “Fluvoxamine showed consistent and meaningful benefits, and because it’s already widely used and well understood, it has clear potential for clinical use.”


International Collaboration and Trial Design

The study involved researchers from Canada, Brazil, and the United States, with clinical sites in Belo Horizonte and throughout Minas Gerais, Brazil. The REVIVE-TOGETHER trial included collaborators from McMaster University, the University of British Columbia, Stanford University, the University of Pittsburgh, Duke University, Georgetown University, and several Brazilian institutions.

Researchers enrolled 399 adults in Brazil who continued to experience fatigue for at least 90 days after a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Participants were randomly assigned to receive fluvoxamine (sold under the brand name Luvox), metformin (a common diabetes medication), or a placebo for 60 days.

“We wanted to test whether two existing, widely available, and affordable medications could help. Both had biological reasons to think they might work against long COVID fatigue, but neither had been rigorously tested for this purpose in a proper clinical trial,” says Mills.

The results showed that fluvoxamine reduced fatigue more than placebo, with a 99 percent probability that the drug performed better than the placebo. It also improved overall quality of life across several measures.

Earlier studies found that metformin can lower the risk of developing long COVID when taken during the acute phase of infection. However, this trial found no meaningful benefit for treating fatigue in people who already have long COVID.


Innovative Trial Methods

The researchers used a Bayesian adaptive trial design, which allowed them to stop certain treatment arms early once clear results emerged – an approach that speeds up evidence generation while maintaining scientific rigor.

“The trial used a sophisticated adaptive design that allowed it to reach conclusions more efficiently than traditional trials, stopping early when the evidence was clear enough – a design innovation as important as the findings themselves,” says Gilmar Reis, lead author and researcher with Cardresearch, a Brazilian clinical research center based in Belo Horizonte. Reis is also a part-time associate professor at McMaster.

Long COVID remains a major global health issue, affecting an estimated 65 million people worldwide. Most medical guidelines still focus on supportive care, such as pacing and symptom management, because of the lack of proven treatments. Researchers note that while fluvoxamine appears promising for fatigue, long COVID involves many symptoms and biological pathways. More research is needed to determine who benefits most, how the drug works, and how it might be used alongside other treatments.

“This trial gives clinicians their first strong evidence for a medication that helps reduce long COVID fatigue. Patients want something they can try today – and this finding brings us closer to that reality,” says Jamie Forrest, corresponding author and postdoctoral research fellow at the University of British Columbia.

Reference: “The Effect of Fluvoxamine and Metformin for Fatigue in Patients With Long COVID” by Gilmar Reis, Eduardo Augusto dos Santos Moreira Silva, Daniela Carla Medeiros Silva, Lehana Thabane, Thiago Santiago Ferreira, Luiza Lanna França Reis, Ana Paula Figueiredo Guimaraes Almeida, Marcela Menezes Amaral, Leonardo Cançado Monteiro Savassi, Vitoria Helena de Souza Campos, Maria Izabel Campos Simplicio, Luciene Barra Ribeiro, Thalyne de Souza Medeiros, Thais Campos Siqueira, Taynara Silva Vieira, Nayara Drumond Rausse, Tereza Cristina Garofolo, Eliane Carreiro Fagundes Silva, Ofir Harari, Gennaro D’Urso, Jamie I. Forrest, Jay Park, Jean B. Nachega, Christopher Lindsell, Jeffrey S. Glenn, Kristian Thorlund, Mark Dybul, Edward J. Mills and REVIVE Investigators, 30 March 2026, Annals of Internal Medicine.
DOI: 10.7326/ANNALS-25-03959
 

Tristan

TB Fanatic
Interesting.

Back in '21, Steve Kirsch had reported that it was useful for avoiding hospitalization. He was roundly rejected, of course.



"
It should be crystal clear to everyone that the current CDC guidelines for treating COVID aren't working.

As of January 18, 2021, the CDC estimates that 90,000 Americans will die from COVID in just the next 3 weeks. What's even worse is that a third of recovered patients from COVID will return to the hospital within 5 months and 1 in 8 die.

We need to keep people out of the hospital in the first place. The only way to do that is to treat them as early as possible with a drug that prevents hospitalization and death.

To date, the #1 drug with the most evidence to make a significant difference, without any doubt, is fluvoxamine. It has shown to be 100% protective of hospitalization in 2 clinical trials. In the second trial, it was shown to be 100% effective in long-haul COVID symptoms: None of the treated patients had any long-haul symptoms after 2 weeks compared to 60% of untreated patients having 1 or more of the 15 long-haul symptoms after two weeks, and 29% having 4 of more of the long haul symptoms after 2 weeks.

While these are stunning results, less than a dozen doctors in the US are prescribing fluvoxamine today. All have had a 100% success record in keeping their patients out of the hospital. The other doctors aren't using it either because they don't know about it or fear doing anything not approved by the CDC for treating COVID.

I've collected fluvoxamine evidence here for convenient access. There is an executive summary below, but the most important thing is that top infectious disease docs who have looked at all the evidence (including the two clinical trial results) believe the effect size is 75% or more in reducing the hospitalization rate. This should be top news, but the press is ignoring this and attempt to write stories about it are killed by the editors. See more below.

Reference materials​

Fluvoxamine public data repository: The fluvoxamine public repository has all the documents related to fluvoxamine for COVID, including the RCT, RWE, observational studies and a link to the 1 hour lecture on serotonin and fluvoxamine."

More material at the link, including links to the studies referenced.
 

Bad Hand

Veteran Member
As soon as I saw the supposed news coming out of China I knew COVID was total BS. Nothing comes out of China unless the Government approves it.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


Long COVID is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease
by Karolinska Institutet
edited by Stephanie Baum, reviewed by Robert Egan
April 1, 2026

People with long COVID are at increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease, according to a new study from Karolinska Institutet published in eClinicalMedicine. The results show that the risk of conditions such as cardiac arrhythmias and coronary artery disease is higher even among those who were not hospitalized during the acute infection.

Long COVID has become an increasingly significant health problem worldwide, and a growing number of studies suggest that the condition can lead to secondary cardiovascular diseases. To date, research has mainly focused on people who were hospitalized, while the risks for those who stayed at home or were treated at a GP are less well known. In the current study, the researchers investigated how often major cardiovascular events occur in these individuals compared with those without the diagnosis.

Of the just over 1.2 million people aged between 18 and 65 included in the study, around 9,000 had been diagnosed with long COVID, corresponding to 0.7%. Two-thirds of them were women. People who had previously had cardiovascular disease or been hospitalized for COVID-19 were excluded from this group.

During the follow-up period of around four years, people with long COVID were more likely to suffer from cardiovascular disease: 18.2% of women and 20.6% of men experienced some form of cardiovascular event, compared with 8.4% of women and 11.1% of men in the group without long COVID.

When the researchers then adjusted the results for factors such as age, socio-economic status and other known risk factors, the differences remained. Women with long COVID had just over twice the risk of receiving a cardiovascular diagnosis compared with women without long COVID. Men had approximately a third higher risk.

"We found that cardiac arrhythmias and coronary artery disease were more common among both women and men with long COVID. In women, there was also an increased risk of heart failure and peripheral vascular disease. However, no clear association was found between long COVID and stroke," says lead author Pia Lindberg, a nurse and Ph.D. student at the Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet.

As many people with long COVID never required hospitalization during their acute infection, there is a risk that secondary conditions may be missed, says Lindberg, pointing out that the results suggest these patients may need to be monitored more systematically.

"Our results show that long COVID can be a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, even in younger people who were previously healthy. This underlines the need for structured follow-up that takes gender differences into account, particularly as cardiovascular disease in women often presents with more diffuse symptoms that can make diagnosis more difficult," concludes Lindberg.

The study was conducted in a collaboration among Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, the Academic Primary Care Centre/Region Stockholm and Uppsala University.

Publication details
Pia Lindberg et al, Long COVID and risk of incident cardiovascular disease—a prospective cohort study using the Multimorbidity Integrated Registry Across Care Levels in Stockholm (MIRACLE-S) cohort Running title: Long COVID and cardiovascular disease, eClinicalMedicine (2026). DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103846
Journal information: EClinicalMedicine
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


SARS-CoV-2 delta and omicron BA.2 show clustered spike D614 reversions. What it could mean for surveillance
by University of Tsukuba
edited by Lisa Lock, reviewed by Robert Egan
April 4, 2026

Researchers from University of Tsukuba and Institute of Science Tokyo have identified nonrandom patterns in the emergence of spike D614 reversions in publicly available SARS-CoV-2 genomic data. Analysis of publicly available sequences revealed numerous instances in which the spike D614G substitution, previously associated with increased transmissibility, reverted from G614 to the ancestral D614 residue, with these events predominantly occurring in the delta and omicron BA.2 lineages. The detected reversions also exhibited nonrandom patterns in temporal occurrence and geographic distribution.

SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19, uses a protruding spike (S) protein to enter host cells. Early in the pandemic, the ancestral D614 residue in the spike protein was rapidly replaced by G614 (the D614G substitution), after which it became nearly fixed across variants of concern.

In this study, published in Microbiology Research, a comprehensive survey of spike sequences deposited in the NCBI GenBank public database was conducted. The analysis revealed that D614 reversions (reverse mutations from G614 back to D614) occurred disproportionately within the delta and omicron BA.2 lineages. These reversions were detected predominantly after the peak transmission periods of the respective lineage surges and showed clear geographic clustering.

Taken together, these observations are not readily explained by spontaneous mutations arising during typical community transmission alone, highlighting the need to further elucidate the processes responsible for generating this pattern.

More information
Hideki Kakeya et al, Anomalous Emergence of D614 Reverse Mutations in the Delta and Omicron BA.2 Variants, Microbiology Research (2026). DOI: 10.3390/microbiolres17020044
 

inskanoot

Veteran Member
Fluvoxamine, similar to Prozac?
AI Overview

Fluvoxamine (Luvox) and Prozac (fluoxetine) are both Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) used to treat mental health conditions, but they are not identical. While both treat depression and anxiety, Luvox vs. Prozac for OCD highlights that Fluvoxamine is primarily used for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD), while Prozac is more commonly used for depression and bulimia.
GoodRx
Key Comparisons:
  • Best Use Cases: Fluvoxamine (Luvox) is frequently preferred for OCD. Prozac (fluoxetine) is commonly used for major depression, panic disorder, and bulimia.
  • Onset/Duration: Fluvoxamine has a short half-life (around 16 hours), often requiring twice-daily dosing. Prozac has a very long half-life (days), allowing for once-daily or even weekly dosing.
  • Side Effects: Both can cause nausea and insomnia. However, Fluvoxamine is more likely to cause diarrhea and drowsiness, whereas Prozac can cause more nervousness or insomnia.
  • Drug Interactions: Both have high potential for drug interactions, but they affect different metabolic pathways.
    GoodRx +5
Disclaimer: These medications require a prescription, and individual reactions vary. Always consult a doctor for medical advice.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


COVID-19 ORF8 Protein Linked to Blood Pressure Spike
Nikhil Prasad Fact checked by:Thailand Medical News Team
Apr 07, 2026

A new scientific study is raising fresh concerns about a lesser-known component of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, suggesting it may quietly trigger long-term health effects even without the full virus present. Researchers have discovered that a viral protein called ORF8 could increase blood pressure and cause harmful oxidative stress in multiple organs - offering new clues into lingering symptoms seen in some COVID-19 patients.


What Makes ORF8 So Concerning
While most public attention has focused on the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, scientists are increasingly investigating accessory proteins like ORF8. These proteins do not help the virus replicate directly but play important roles in how it interacts with the human body.

In this study, researchers from the Laboratorio Multidisciplinario en Ciencias Biomédicas, Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico, and the Laboratorio de Medicina de la Conservación, Escuela Superior de Medicina del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico, examined how ORF8 affects the body when introduced through the nose, mimicking natural infection pathways.

Their findings suggest that ORF8 may disrupt normal biological systems in ways that could contribute to long COVID symptoms.


Study Design and Key Observations

The research involved male BALB/c mice that were exposed to the ORF8 protein through intranasal administration. Scientists monitored the animals over two timeframes—short-term (2 weeks) and longer-term (8 weeks).

According to the study, blood pressure levels increased significantly in the longer-term group exposed to ORF8. Both systolic and diastolic pressures were elevated, indicating that this protein alone may influence cardiovascular function.

Interestingly, these changes occurred without the presence of the full virus, suggesting that even isolated viral components could have lasting physiological effects.


Oxidative Stress Across Multiple Organs

One of the most striking findings involved oxidative stress, a harmful condition caused by an imbalance between damaging molecules and the body’s defenses.

The study found that ORF8 exposure increased oxidative stress markers in critical organs such as the kidneys and brain. In particular, the prefrontal cortex showed reduced catalase activity - a key antioxidant enzyme - within just two weeks.

Additionally, levels of malondialdehyde, a marker of cellular damage, were significantly elevated in both the brain and kidneys during early stages. This indicates that ORF8 may trigger immediate tissue damage through oxidative mechanisms.

Over time, the body appeared to partially compensate, as some oxidative stress markers normalized after eight weeks. However, kidney-related antioxidant changes persisted, hinting at possible long-term damage.


Kidney and Brain May Be Most Vulnerable
The kidneys showed a notable increase in total antioxidant capacity after prolonged exposure, which researchers interpret as a defensive response to ongoing stress. However, such compensation may not fully prevent injury. At the same time, early changes in the brain - especially in areas linked to thinking and memory - suggest a possible connection between ORF8 and cognitive symptoms reported in long COVID cases.

This Medical News report highlights that even subtle biochemical disruptions could translate into real-world health problems over time.


Why Blood Pressure Is Affected
Scientists believe the mechanism may involve inflammation and oxidative damage affecting blood vessels. ORF8 is known to interfere with immune signaling and may indirectly disrupt the balance of hormones that regulate blood pressure.

This could lead to narrowing of blood vessels and increased resistance, ultimately raising blood pressure levels. Over time, such effects may contribute to cardiovascular risks.


Important Limitations to Consider

The study was conducted in mice, not humans, so results may not fully translate to clinical settings. Additionally, the ORF8 protein used lacked certain natural modifications found in real viral infections, which could influence its behavior.
Despite this, the findings provide strong evidence that ORF8 alone can alter biological systems in meaningful ways.


Conclusions

The study presents compelling evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 ORF8 protein is not just a passive viral component but an active driver of physiological disruption. It appears capable of increasing blood pressure, triggering oxidative stress, and affecting key organs such as the kidneys and brain. These effects may help explain some of the persistent symptoms seen in long COVID, particularly those involving cardiovascular and cognitive issues. While more human studies are needed, the findings emphasize the importance of looking beyond the spike protein to fully understand the virus’s long-term impact on health.

The study findings were published in the peer reviewed journal: Viruses.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


Tea Compounds Show Promise Against COVID-19
Nikhil Prasad Fact checked by:Thailand Medical News Team
Apr 09, 2026

A growing body of scientific research is now shedding light on a surprising ally in the fight against COVID-19 - tea. Scientists have discovered that natural compounds found in tea, known as polyphenols, may help interfere with the coronavirus in multiple ways. While not a cure, these findings open the door to new supportive strategies that could complement existing treatments.


What Are Tea Polyphenols and Why They Matter
Tea polyphenols are natural plant compounds found in green, black, and oolong tea. The most well-known of these include catechins such as EGCG (epigallocatechin gallate), along with theaflavins and flavonols. These substances are already known for their antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties.

Researchers involved in this study came from multiple institutions, including the Institute of Marine and Environmental Technology at the University of Maryland Baltimore County, the Agricultural Biotechnology Laboratory at Auxergen Inc., the Renal Care Research and Health Promotion Association in Taiwan, Cathay General Hospital in Taipei, and the School of Medicine at Fu Jen Catholic University in New Taipei City.

What makes these compounds particularly interesting is their ability to interact with both viruses and the human immune system, potentially influencing how infections develop and progress.


How Tea Compounds May Block the Virus
Scientists have identified several ways tea polyphenols could interfere with the coronavirus lifecycle. First, they may prevent the virus from attaching to human cells. The virus uses a protein called the spike protein to latch onto a receptor known as ACE2 on human cells. Some tea compounds appear to disrupt this interaction.

Second, these compounds may stop the virus from multiplying. Once inside the body, the virus relies on specific enzymes to replicate. Tea polyphenols have shown the ability to block key viral enzymes such as proteases and RNA polymerase, which are essential for viral reproduction.

Third, tea polyphenols may even interfere with later stages of the virus life cycle, including assembly and release of new viral particles, making it harder for the infection to spread within the body.


Fighting Inflammation and Protecting the Body

Beyond direct antiviral effects, tea compounds may also help control the body’s immune response. Severe COVID-19 is often driven by an overreaction of the immune system, sometimes called a cytokine storm.

Tea polyphenols have been shown to reduce the production of inflammatory molecules such as IL-6 and TNF-alpha. They also help reduce oxidative stress, which can damage tissues during infection.

This Medical News report highlights that these dual actions - fighting the virus and calming inflammation - make tea polyphenols especially int eresting as supportive agents.


Potential Role in Recovery and Long COVID
Another important finding is the possible role of tea compounds in recovery after infection. Studies suggest that these compounds may help reduce lung damage, support tissue repair, and even limit fibrosis, a condition where lung tissue becomes scarred.

This is particularly relevant for people suffering from long COVID, where lingering inflammation and tissue damage can cause prolonged symptoms. Tea polyphenols may help restore balance in the body and support healing over time.


The Big Challenge: Do They Work in Real Life
Despite promising laboratory results, there is a major limitation. Most of the evidence so far comes from computer models and lab experiments, not large human trials.

One key issue is that the body absorbs only small amounts of these compounds when consumed as tea. The levels needed to block the virus in lab studies are often much higher than what can be achieved through normal drinking.

Scientists are now exploring new delivery methods, such as inhaled formulations and nanotechnology, to overcome this limitation.


Conclusion

Tea polyphenols represent a fascinating and promising area of COVID-19 research, offering a multi-target approach that includes blocking viral entry, stopping replication, and reducing harmful inflammation. However, current evidence remains largely preclinical, and there is still no strong proof from large human trials that these compounds can effectively treat or prevent COVID-19.

While drinking tea may support general health and immune function, it should not be considered a replacement for vaccines or medical treatments. Future research, especially well-designed clinical studies, will be essential to determine whether these natural compounds can be translated into real-world therapies or preventive strategies.

The study findings were published in the peer reviewed journal: Current Issues in Molecular Biology.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBw4NgG0KMs
Pfizer Chief Toxicologist Bombshell Admission
Aseem Malhotra
Mar 22, 2026
4 min 55 sec

Dr Helmut Sterz ( Former Pfizer Chief Toxicologist ) speaks at German Covid Inquiry on the mRNA vaccine. (In German with English subtitles.)


MORE ON THE VIDEO:

from: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/...ficial-shots-likely-killed-thousands-germany/
(fair use applies)
EXCERPT

... Dr. Helmut Sterz, Pfizer’s former chief toxicologist, admitted last month during a German COVID-19 Inquiry that an estimated 60,000 people have died in Germany from Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, Comirnaty.

According to Sterz, the Paul Ehrlich Institute, Germany’s regulatory and research institute for vaccines and biomedicines, has received 2,133 reports of death following Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.

He said, “These spontaneous reports likely have a high number of unreported cases due to underreporting. The true number is therefore much higher.”

“In the U.S., it is assumed that there is an underreporting factor of 30 by which the registered cases would have to be multiplied. For Germany, this would correspond to 60,000 deaths from the vaccination,” Sterz said.

Sterz told the German commissioners that Pfizer’s post-marketing report mentioned 1,200 suspected deaths within just two months of the shot’s approval.

“At that point, Comirnaty should have been withdrawn from the market,” Sterz said.

Sterz also testified that “due to time constraints,” Pfizer didn’t conduct vital safety checks on its COVID-19 vaccine before rolling it out to the public. For instance, the vaccine maker skipped carcinogenicity studies that would have examined whether the shots had cancer-causing properties.

Pfizer also failed to study the vaccine’s impact on pregnancy.

Sterz called for a new and independent scientific review of the COVID-19 vaccines’ long-term effects. “We need proper independent safety studies to understand what really happened. Without full transparency, people will not trust the conclusions,” he said, according to GB News.

[...]

The commissioner asked Sterz if the benefits of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine seem to outweigh the risks.

Sterz said no.

According to Sterz, the mathematician Robert Rockenfeller, Ph.D., from the University of Koblenz, estimates there are 25 severe side effects from Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine for one severe course of COVID-19 infection that the shot allegedly prevented.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


COVID-19's lingering shadow: The molecular link between SARS-CoV-2 and lung cancer risk
by Hebrew University of Jerusalem
edited by Sadie Harley, reviewed by Robert Egan
April 10, 2026

A new study suggests that COVID-19 may slightly increase the risk of lung cancer by triggering a biological chain reaction in the lungs, driven by the virus's spike protein, that promotes inflammation, scarring, and tumor-friendly conditions, especially in higher-risk groups like smokers; while the individual risk remains small, the findings are important because they reveal a plausible mechanism and potential targets for prevention and treatment.

A possible new link to cancer

In the years since the COVID-19 pandemic began, scientists have worked to understand its long-term consequences. Now, a new international study reveals a concerning possibility: the virus's spike protein may actively contribute to the development of lung cancer.

Prof. Alex Gileles-Hillel of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Hadassah Medical Center, together with Cayleigh Wallace, Dr. Hong Yue, Prof. David Gozal, and Dr. Wei Li of Marshall University, conducted a study that uncovers a biological pathway through which SARS-CoV-2 may leave a lasting imprint on lung health.

The research paper, titled "Thymidine phosphorylase promotes SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-driven lung tumor development," is published in Frontiers in Immunology.

Clinicians have long observed that many COVID-19 survivors develop interstitial lung fibrosis, a condition marked by scarring of lung tissue and known to increase cancer risk. Until now, however, the mechanism connecting viral infection to tumor development has remained unclear.

"The key question was whether the virus itself, particularly its spike protein, could set the stage for cancer," the researchers said.

What the large data set shows

To investigate this, the team combined large-scale human data with mechanistic biological analysis.

Using the TriNetX global health database, researchers analyzed more than 166,000 patients, carefully matching cohorts demographically to isolate the effects of COVID-19.

Key findings include:
  • COVID-19 survivors showed a significantly increased (albeit small) risk of lung cancer
  • The risk was especially pronounced among current smokers
  • Relative risk increased by 22%, with a hazard ratio of 1.50 (P < .001)
  • Oral and bladder cancer risks were not increased (suggesting a specific predilection of the virus to affect the lungs).
"These findings suggest that COVID-19 is not only an acute illness, but may also have long-term implications for lung cancer risk," the researchers noted.

The enzyme at the heart of concern

At the center of the newly identified pathway is an enzyme called thymidine phosphorylase (TYMP), which appears to play a critical role in linking viral-induced lung injury to tumor development.

The study found that activation of TYMP is associated with:
  • Increased lung inflammation and tissue damage
  • Enhanced fibrosis and collagen deposition
  • Activation of STAT3, a well-known cancer-promoting signaling pathway
  • A shift toward a tumor-supportive immune environment
"This suggests that TYMP doesn't just influence tumor growth—it reshapes the entire immune environment of the lung in ways that can promote cancer," the researchers explained.

Further analysis showed that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein alters the processing of ACE2, the receptor the virus uses to enter lung cells, generating smaller fragments consistent with increased tissue turnover and damage.

A chain reaction from virus to tumor

Together, these findings outline a potential cascade:

Spike protein > lung injury > TYMP activation > STAT3 signaling > fibrosis and immune remodeling > tumor development

"This work provides a biological framework that helps explain emerging clinical observations since the pandemic began," the researchers said. "While the absolute risk for any individual remains modest, the population-level implications are significant, particularly for individuals with existing risk factors such as smoking."

Looking ahead to prevention and treatment


Encouragingly, the study also points toward new therapeutic possibilities.

"By identifying TYMP as a central driver, we open the door to targeted strategies aimed at reducing long-term lung damage," the researchers added. "Inhibiting this pathway could represent a novel approach not only for cancer prevention, but also for limiting fibrosis and chronic lung disease following viral infection."

As the world continues to move from pandemic response to long-term recovery, understanding the hidden biological consequences of SARS-CoV-2 is becoming increasingly important.

"This study highlights both a potential risk and an opportunity," the researchers concluded. "With deeper understanding comes the ability to intervene earlier and more effectively."

Publication details
Cayleigh Wallace et al, Thymidine phosphorylase promotes SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-driven lung tumor development, Frontiers in Immunology (2026). DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1798566
Journal information: Frontiers in Immunology
Provided by Hebrew University of Jerusalem
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


Study Shows That All Exposed to COVID-19 Have an Increased Risk of Developing Lung Cancer Over Time
Nikhil Prasad Fact checked by:Thailand Medical News Team
Apr 11, 2026


A New Study Reveals a Hidden Biological Link Between COVID-19 and Lung Cancer Risk
Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, scientists have been racing to understand not just the immediate effects of the virus, but also its long-term consequences. Now, a new international study is raising concerns about a possible connection between COVID-19 and an increased risk of lung cancer over time. The findings suggest that even after recovery, the virus may leave behind subtle but important changes in the lungs that could contribute to cancer development.

This Medical News report highlights how researchers have uncovered a detailed biological pathway that may explain this risk, offering both concern and hope for future prevention strategies.


Researchers Identify a Potential Cancer-Triggering Mechanism
The study was conducted by a team of scientists from Marshall University in Huntington, United States, and The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Hadassah Medical Center in Jerusalem, Israel. Key contributors included Prof. Alex Gileles-Hillel, Cayleigh Wallace, Dr. Hong Yue, Prof. David Gozal, and Dr. Wei Li.

Their research focused on the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, the part of the virus responsible for entering human cells. While this protein is widely known for initiating infection, the study found that it may also trigger a chain of biological events that promote long-term lung damage and potentially cancer.


Large-Scale Human Data Shows Increased Risk
To understand the real-world impact, researchers analyzed data from over 166,000 patients using the TriNetX global health database. By carefully matching individuals based on age, gender, and other factors, they were able to isolate the effect of COVID-19.

The findings revealed that people who had recovered from COVID-19 showed a 22 percent higher relative risk of developing lung cancer compared to those who had never been infected. The risk was especially higher among current smokers, suggesting that pre-existing lung damage may worsen the effects of the virus.

Interestingly, the increased risk was specific to lung cancer. Other cancers, such as oral or bladder cancer, did not show the same pattern, indicating that the virus may uniquely affect lung tissue.


The Role of an Enzyme Called TYMP
At the center of this discovery is an enzyme known as thymidine phosphorylase (TYMP). The study found that this enzyme becomes highly active after exposure to the spike protein and plays a key role in damaging lung tissue.

TYMP appears to drive several harmful processes, including inflammation, scarring (fibrosis), and changes in the immune system. These changes create an environment in the lungs that is more favorable for tumor development. The researchers also found that TYMP activates a well-known cancer- related pathway called STAT3. This pathway is involved in cell growth and survival and is often linked to tumor progression.


A Step-by-Step Chain Reaction in the Lungs

The study outlines a clear sequence of events that may occur after COVID-19 infection. First, the spike protein causes injury to lung cells. This injury then activates TYMP, which increases inflammation and scarring. At the same time, STAT3 signaling is triggered, and the immune system shifts into a state that supports tumor growth rather than fighting it.

Over time, this combination of damage and altered immune response may increase the likelihood of cancer developing, particularly in individuals who already have risk factors such as smoking.


Animal Studies Confirm the Findings
To strengthen their conclusions, the researchers conducted experiments in specially designed mice. These experiments showed that exposure to the spike protein significantly increased lung tumor formation. However, when TYMP was removed or blocked, the number and size of tumors were greatly reduced. This provides strong evidence that TYMP is not just associated with cancer risk but may actively drive the process.


Implications for Future Treatment and Prevention

One of the most important aspects of this study is that it identifies potential targets for treatment. By focusing on TYMP and the pathways it controls, scientists may be able to develop therapies that reduce long-term lung damage and lower cancer risk after COVID-19.

Existing drugs that inhibit TYMP are already being used for other conditions, raising the possibility that they could be repurposed for patients recovering from COVID-19.


Conclusion
The findings of this study provide an important new perspective on the long-term effects of COVID-19. While the increased risk of lung cancer for any individual remains relatively small, the sheer number of people infected worldwide means that even a modest rise in risk could have significant public health implications. The research clearly shows that COVID-19 is not just a short-term respiratory illness but may leave lasting biological changes in the lungs that evolve over time. Importantly, the identification of TYMP as a central player offers a promising pathway for intervention, allowing scientists to explore targeted treatments that could prevent or reduce these long-term risks. Moving forward, regular monitoring of lung health in COVID-19 survivors, especially smokers and high-risk individuals, may become increasingly important. Continued research will be essential to fully understand the long-term cancer risks and to develop effective strategies to protect those affected.

The study findings were published in the peer reviewed journal: Frontiers in Immunology.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


COVID-19 Reduces Brain Blood Flow
Nikhil Prasad Fact checked by:Thailand Medical News Team
Apr 11, 2026


Medical News: Long-Term Brain Changes Raise Concerns After Infection
Emerging research is revealing a concerning link between COVID-19 infections and lasting changes in brain function. Scientists have found that individuals who experienced serious illness - especially those requiring hospitalization - may continue to show reduced blood flow in the brain more than a year after recovery. These findings are helping to explain why some people report lingering mental fog and memory issues long after the infection has cleared.

The study was conducted by researchers from The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States; the Arizona Alzheimer’s Consortium, Phoenix, Arizona, United States; the Division of Vascular Surgery at The University of Arizona; the Laboratory of FMRI Technology at the Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States; and the Evelyn F. McKnight Brain Institute, Tucson, Arizona, United States.


Understanding What Happens Inside the Brain
The research team examined a group of individuals with varying levels of COVID-19 severity, ranging from those who never had the infection to those who were hospitalized with significant breathing difficulties. Participants were assessed more than a year after their initial illness.

Using advanced brain imaging techniques, scientists measured how effectively blood was circulating through different regions of the brain. Blood flow is essential for delivering oxygen and nutrients, and even small disruptions can affect how the brain performs.


Severe Cases Show Lasting Impact
The most important discovery was that individuals who had been hospitalized due to COVID-19 showed noticeably lower blood flow in the brain’s gray matter. This part of the brain plays a key role in processing information, memory, and decision-making.

Interestingly, people who had milder forms of COVID-19 did not show consistent reductions in blood flow overall. However, there was significant variation among individuals, suggesting that some people may still experience hidden changes even after less severe illness.

This Medical News report highlights that these effects are not short-lived. The reduced blood flow appears to persist well beyond the initial infection period, raising concerns about long-term brain health.


Memory Changes Are Subtle but Important

Despite the clear biological differences, most participants performed similarly on general memory tests. This suggests that the brain may compensate for some of these changes, at least in everyday situations.

However, a more sensitive measure of memory - known as pattern separation - told a different story. This ability helps people distinguish between similar experiences or details, and it was found to be linked to brain blood flow. Individuals with better circulation in the brain performed better on this task. This indicates that while major memory problems may not always be obvious, more subtle cognitive functions could still be affected.


A Widespread Rather Than Localized Effect
Another key finding was that the reduced blood flow was not limited to one specific region. Instead, it appeared across multiple areas of the brain, suggesting a more global impact.

At the same time, the brain’s white matter - which supports communication between different regions - did not show significant long-term damage. This points toward blood flow disruption, rather than structural injury, as a major factor behind lingering symptoms.


What Could Be Causing These Changes
Researchers believe several biological mechanisms may be involved. COVID-19 is known to trigger inflammation and affect blood vessels, which can disrupt the delicate balance of blood flow in the brain. It may also interfere with the blood-brain barrier, a protective system that regulates what enters the brain.

Additionally, certain cells that help control blood vessel function may be directly affected by the virus, potentially leading to reduced circulation over time.


Conclusion

The findings provide important insight into how severe COVID-19 can leave a lasting mark on the brain. Even more than a year after recovery, individuals who experienced serious illness may continue to show reduced blood flow, which could subtly influence cognitive performance. While many people appear to recover well, others may face hidden challenges that are not immediately obvious through standard testing. These results emphasize the need for continued monitoring and further research to fully understand the long-term neurological effects of COVID-19 and to develop strategies for recovery and support.

The study findings were published in the peer reviewed journal: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


COVID-19 Link to Parkinson’s Risk Sparks Alarm
Nikhil Prasad Fact checked by:Thailand Medical News Team
Apr 12, 2026


Medical News: New Research Reveals Overlapping Brain Damage Pathways

Scientists have uncovered striking biological links between COVID-19 and Parkinson’s disease, raising concerns that the viral infection could increase the risk of long-term neurological damage. The findings come from a detailed genetic and cellular analysis that reveals how both conditions may share similar pathways of brain inflammation and neuron dysfunction.


How the Study Was Conducted
Researchers from the Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China, analyzed large datasets of gene activity from patients with COVID-19 and Parkinson’s disease. They combined bulk RNA sequencing with advanced single-cell RNA sequencing to examine how individual brain cells behave during infection. Their goal was to identify overlapping genes and biological processes that could explain why some COVID-19 patients develop neurological symptoms resembling Parkinson’s.


Shared Genetic Signals Discovered

The team identified hundreds of genes that behaved abnormally in both diseases, with 77 genes overlapping between COVID-19 and Parkinson’s. These shared genes were strongly linked to inflammation, immune responses, and damage to dopamine-producing neurons, which are essential for movement control. Loss of these neurons is a hallmark of Parkinson’s disease.

Further analysis showed that inflammatory pathways, including cytokine signaling and immune cell activation, were highly active in both conditions. This suggests that COVID-19 may trigger or accelerate processes that are already known to drive neurodegeneration.


A Key Molecule Takes Center Stage

Among all the genes studied, one stood out: CHI3L1. This molecule appears to act as a central switch linking COVID-19 infection to brain inflammation and neuronal damage. Researchers found that CHI3L1 levels were significantly elevated in brain cells called astrocytes in COVID-19 patients.

Astrocytes play a crucial role in supporting neurons, regulating brain activity, and controlling inflammation. However, when overactivated, they can contribute to harmful immune responses. The study showed that CHI3L1-rich astrocytes were far more common in COVID-19 brains, suggesting a possible mechanism for long-term neurological complications.


Brain Cell Communication Disrupted

The research also revealed major changes in how brain cells communicate. Astrocytes were found to interact intensely with microglia, neurons, and other supporting cells through complex signaling networks. These interactions involved molecules such as SPP1, CADM1, NCAM1, and NRXN1, all of which influence brain function and structure.

This Medical News report highlights that these communication disrupti ons may affect synaptic plasticity, the brain’s ability to adapt and learn. Over time, such disturbances could contribute to cognitive decline, motor symptoms, and increased vulnerability to neurodegenerative diseases.


Metabolic Changes Mirror Parkinson’s Disease
Another important finding involved cellular metabolism. In COVID-19 patients, astrocytes showed increased energy activity, particularly in oxidative phosphorylation. Meanwhile, neurons displayed reduced tyrosine metabolism, a process directly linked to dopamine production.

These metabolic shifts closely resemble those seen in Parkinson’s disease, suggesting that COVID-19 may create a brain environment that favors neurodegeneration. The study also observed that inflammation-related pathways became more active over time, while dopamine-related functions declined.


Why This Matters for Long-Term Health

The implications of these findings are significant. COVID-19 is already known to cause a wide range of neurological symptoms, from brain fog to stroke. This new research suggests that the virus may also have lasting effects on brain health, potentially increasing the risk of Parkinson’s disease in some individuals.

While more research is needed, especially in clinical settings, the identification of CHI3L1 as a key player opens the door to new treatment strategies. Targeting this molecule could help reduce inflammation and protect brain cells from damage.


Conclusion

In conclusion, this study provides compelling evidence that COVID-19 and Parkinson’s disease share critical biological mechanisms, particularly involving inflammation and dopamine neuron dysfunction. The discovery of overlapping genes and disrupted brain cell communication highlights how viral infections may have long-term neurological consequences. Importantly, the identification of CHI3L1 as a central factor offers a promising target for future therapies.

Continued research is essential to confirm these findings and to develop interventions that could prevent or reduce the risk of neurodegenerative diseases following COVID-19 infection.

The study findings were published in the peer reviewed journal: mSphere.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


Natural Compounds from Siphonostegia Chinensis Show Strong Potential Against COVID-19 Enzyme
Nikhil Prasad Fact checked by:Thailand Medical News Team
Apr 11, 2026

A new scientific investigation has identified naturally occurring compounds from a traditional medicinal herb that may help inhibit a critical enzyme used by the virus responsible for COVID-19. The findings offer fresh insight into how plant-derived substances could contribute to future antiviral drug development.


Targeting a Critical Viral Enzyme
The virus that causes COVID-19 relies on a key enzyme known as the main protease (Mpro) to replicate within the human body. This enzyme plays an essential role in processing viral proteins required for replication. Blocking Mpro effectively disrupts the virus’s ability to multiply, making it one of the most important targets in antiviral research.

Scientists in this study focused on Siphonostegia chinensis, a plant widely used in traditional Chinese medicine for treating respiratory and inflammatory conditions. Previous studies have suggested that this herb contains bioactive compounds, but its potential antiviral effects had not been fully explored.


Identification of Active Antiviral Compounds
Through a series of laboratory analyses, researchers identified two key compounds - verbascoside and 3,4-dicaffeoylquinic acid - as the most active components against the viral enzyme.

Both compounds demonstrated strong binding affinity to Mpro, meaning they were able to attach effectively to the enzyme and interfere with its function. Laboratory enzyme inhibition tests confirmed that these compounds significantly reduced Mpro activity.

Verbascoside emerged as the more potent of the two, showing stronger inhibitory effects at lower concentrations. Its IC50 value - a measure of how much of a substance is needed to inhibit an enzyme by half - was notably low, indicating high effectiveness. The second compound, 3,4-dicaffeoylquinic acid, also showed meaningful activity but required slightly higher concentrations to achieve similar effects.


Understanding How These Compounds Work
Further computational modeling revealed that both compounds bind within the enzyme’s active site. They form stable interactions with critical amino acids responsible for the enzyme’s function. These interactions prevent the enzyme from processing viral proteins, effectively halting replication.

Importantly, the compounds act through non-covalent interactions, meaning they bind reversibly. This type of binding is often associated with safer drug profiles and fewer long-term side effects compared to irreversible inhibitors.


Differences in Extraction Methods
The study also found that how the plant is processed significantly affects its antiviral potential. The ethanol-based extract of Siphonostegia chinensis showed much stronger inhibitory activity compared to water-based extracts.

This suggests that the most effective antiviral compounds are more soluble in alcohol and may not be fully extracted through traditional preparation methods such as boiling in water. This finding could influence how herbal medicines are formulated in the future to maximize their therapeutic benefits.


Safety and Drug Development Considerations
Preliminary safety predictions indicate that both compounds have relatively favorable profiles, including low risk of genetic toxicity. However, some concerns remain, such as potential effects on heart-related ion channels and possible liver toxicity, particularly with verbascoside.

Additionally, both compounds showed limited absorption in predicted models, which could affect how well they work inside the human body. These challenges highlight the need for further optimization and testing before clinical use.


Implications for Future Antiviral Therapies

This Medical News report underscores the growing importance of natural products in modern drug discovery. The study demonstrates that compounds derived from traditional medicinal plants can directly target essential viral mechanisms with high specificity and potency.

The conclusions are highly encouraging. These findings provide strong evidence that naturally occurring compounds such as verbascoside and 3,4-dicaffeoylquinic acid can serve as promising lead candidates for the development of new antiviral therapies. While additional research, including clinical trials, is necessary, the results lay a solid scientific foundation for future drug development. Furthermore, the study highlights the value of integrating traditional medicine knowledge with modern scientific techniques to accelerate the discovery of effective treatments for emerging viral diseases.

The study findings were published in the peer reviewed journal: Frontiers in Chemistry.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1MK6Ge6-4HU
COVID Reality Check: Dr. Chetty on What We’re Seeing Now
Vejon Health
Apr 18 2026
1 hr 3 min 35 sec


At the beginning of 2026, Dr. Shankara Chetty and I discussed what we believed the year would bring—more immune dysregulation, rising chronic illness, subtle reinfections, and a growing disconnect between what patients feel and what medicine is willing to acknowledge. Now, months later, we return to ask the most important question: were we right? In this follow-up discussion, we look at what has changed, what patterns are becoming clearer, and whether the pandemic trajectory is unfolding as expected.

Using both frontline clinical experience and broader population-level dashboard data, we explore what is happening beneath the surface—why more people feel unwell despite “normal” tests, why excess mortality and chronic disease patterns continue to rise, and what this means for the months ahead. This is not a discussion about fear, but about preparation. If we are to understand what comes next, we must first be honest about what is happening now.
 
Top