CORONA Main Coronavirus thread

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yRwlxZ-BTaY
PREMIERE
How Do Kids Spread Covid-19?

•Premiere in progress. Started 7 minutes ago


Peak Prosperity

With millions of students poised to return to school, stressed parents are wondering: How worried should I be about my kid catching covid-19 at school? Well, we're beginning to understand the risks. First the good news: children under 10 do indeed appear to transmit the virus to others much less often than adults do. Though the transmission rate is not zero.

Now the bad news: kids between 10 and 19 transmit the virus at the same rate as do adults. So the short answer is: if you send your kids back to a school where they're interacting with others, you should be assume the odds are good they'll get infected at some point. Prepare your household accordingly. Make sure your kids have masks/sanitizers/etc, are urged to respect social distancing, and boost their immune system with a healthy diet and plenty of sleep. But have a home quarantine plan in place, including distancing your kid from at-risk populations (like elderly grandparents), in case they fall ill.

_____________________________________ TODAY'S VIDEO LINKS: James Todaro on t-cell and herd immunity https://twitter.com/JamesTodaroMD/sta... Children spread Covid https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/18/he... Excess Mortality https://www.economist.com/graphic-det... Masks = lower load = lower illness https://www.independent.co.uk/news/he... Proper masks https://nypost.com/2020/08/11/duke-un... Ivermectin Better than HCQ? https://www.trialsitenews.com/tata-ma... Ivermectin Better Than HCQ? https://www.trialsitenews.com/norther... Swedish Doctor’s perspective https://sebastianrushworth.com/2020/0...
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nImxew6alO0
12:11 min
US Patients With Newly Identified Cancer Before and During #COVID19
•Streamed live 3 hours ago


JAMA Network

Harvey W. Kaufman, MD joins JAMA Network Open Digital Media Editor, Seth Trueger, MD, MPH, to discuss a cross-sectional study examining changes in the number of patients with newly identified cancer before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in the United States. Read the article here: https://ja.ma/31khw7X. JNO Live is a weekly broadcast featuring conversations about the latest research being published in JAMA Network Open.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZH8I06W_u5g
58:40 min
War Room Pandemic Ep 327 - Man-Made Mystery (w/ Steven Mosher and Dr. Li Meng Yan)
•Streamed live 9 hours ago


Bannon WarRoom - Citizens of the American Republic


Raheem Kassam, Jack Maxey, and Vish Burra are joined by Steve Bannon to discuss the latest on the coronavirus pandemic as the origins of the virus slowly come to light from primary sources. Calling in is Steven Mosher to talk about his piece discussing the origins of COVID-19. Also calling in is Dr. Li Meng Yan to discuss her knowledge of the origins of the virus.

________________________________________

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nA4gdfysPtY
59:45 min
War Room Pandemic Ep 328 - Veepstakes Extravaganza (w/ Natalie Winters)
8 hours ago


Bannon WarRoom - Citizens of the American Republic


Raheem Kassam, Jack Maxey, and Vish Burra discuss the latest on the coronavirus pandemic as the Biden campaign looks for a boost in the polls with the announcement of the VP pick. Calling in is Natalie Winters to discuss Fareed Zakaria's hidden CCP connections.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Top California health official resigns amid revelation of giant coronavirus record backlog
“We’re all accountable in our respective roles for what happens underneath us,” California's governor said.



California governor says 'none of this is easy' after state health director resigns
AUG. 10, 202005:45


By Tim Stelloh

California’s public health chief resigned late Sunday, days after officials revealed a backlog of hundreds of thousands of coronavirus records that Gov. Gavin Newsom said Monday were never reported to his administration.

Pressed during a news conference about the abrupt resignation of Dr. Sonia Angell, the former director of the state Department of Public Health, Newsom declined to say if he asked her to quit.

“We’re all accountable in our respective roles for what happens underneath us,” he said. “I don’t want to air any more than that. But if it’s not obvious then, well, I encourage you to consider the fact that we accepted the resignation.”

In her letter, Angell, who was hired less than a year ago, did not say why she was resigning effective immediately, according to NBC Bay Area, which obtained the letter.

But last week, California Health and Human Services Secretary Dr. Mark Ghaly disclosed that as many 300,000 records hadn’t been processed, leaving county health officials without data on the virus’ transmission.

The revelations came as Newsom said that coronavirus cases in the state appeared to be trending down. California, the most populous state in the country, topped New York last month with the highest number of reported cases in the United States.

Ghaly attributed the problem to a computer server outage late last month and a failure to renew a certificate for Quest Diagnostics, a commercial lab that tests for coronavirus. He said that Newsom had a ordered a full investigation into the incident.

Ghaly said Monday that the backlog was processed over the weekend and would be available to counties in the coming days.

Newsom said he was confident those cases wouldn’t alter the virus’ downward trajectory statewide. Hospitalizations were down 19 percent over a two-week period, while intensive care unit admissions were down five percent, he said.

Sixty-six people died Sunday, he said. The average daily death count remained at 137.

Angell’s resignation comes amid resignations and terminations of public health officials across the United States. A review by the Associated Press and Kaiser Health News found that 49 officials in 23 states have been fired or quit since April.

The review attributed many departures to conflicts over mask orders and shutdowns. Others quit for family reasons or because they said they were overworked and underpaid.

Lori Tremmel Freeman, CEO of the National Association of County and City Health Officials, told the AP that state and city officials could scarcely “afford to hit the pause button and say, ‘We’re going to change the leadership around here and we’ll get back to you after we hire somebody.’”

Among the officials to step down was New York City health commissioner Dr. Oxiris Barbot, who resigned last week after her department's role was diminished in the administration of Mayor Bill de Blasio, according to NBC New York. Earlier this year, she had a much-publicized "argument" with a top New York Police Department official over personal protective equipment, according to the station.

In a resignation letter, Barbot did not say why she quit, but the chairman of the city council’s health committee, Mark Levine, called her departure a “grave blow to the fight for public health here.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment


Horowitz: Bombshell report: Dr. Birx believes the CDC is inflating death numbers by as much as 25%
Daniel Horowitz · May 11, 2020

Deborah Birx

Doug Mills | Getty Images

Why is it that long past the peak of the virus, the number of deaths continues to skyrocket beyond what the revised government models predicted?

On Saturday, the Washington Post reported that Dr. Deborah Birx, the White House Coronavirus Task Force response administrator, is accusing the CDC of using an antiquated model to track coronavirus deaths that could be responsible for inflating the death numbers by as much as 25 percent. The Post cites four unnamed sources who reported a dispute between Birx and Robert Redfield, the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, last Wednesday over the modeling.

“There is nothing from the CDC that I can trust,” Birx reportedly said, according to two of the Post’s sources.

If the 25% inflation number is true, that would place the total deaths closer to the 66,000 death figure that the government predicted in April.

We need not rely on an off-the-record citation from the Washington Post to know that where there is smoke, there is fire. Birx already publicly admitted last month that CDC is telling states to code any death of an individual who tests positive for COVID-19 as a coronavirus death, even if it is not proven that the death was caused by COVID-19. The problem is now that we know the virus is so much more widespread than previously thought, and therefore so much less deadly, how can we assume that anyone who merely tests positive for the virus died because of the virus? This is especially true now that we know that the majority of those who test positive for coronavirus in areas where everyone is tested (ships, meatpacking plants, and prisons, for example) are asymptomatic?

This was always the vexing question concerning the death count, but it has become even more troubling now that deaths continue to surge long past the peak of the virus and with hospitalizations way down. We got the answer to this question last week when it became apparent that the overwhelming majority of deaths in recent days have been in nursing homes. In some states, more than 100% of reported deaths on a given day are in nursing homes, because they are now retroactively adding previously undeclared deaths as nursing home deaths.

The fact that states are just backfilling so many deaths of nursing home patients makes the numbers even more suspicious. There certainly is a terrible tragedy unfolding in senior facilities, partiality due to states demanding that these facilities take in coronavirus patients. It wasn’t until yesterday that New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo rescinded the order forcing nursing homes into this suicidal policy.

Undoubtedly, many people have died from the virus in these facilities. The official count from 39 states that have reported data broken down by long-term senior care facility shows that 52% of all deaths nationwide have been in nursing homes, according to a spreadsheet prepared by Phil Kerpen.

We now know that states either mandated the return of hospitalized COVID-19 patients into nursing homes or gave no guidance to nursing homes on what to do with those who tested positive. As the Washington Post reports, while “Lockdown Larry” Hogan was locking down an entire state, “there was no process in place to ensure that the facility [in La Plata, Maryland, with the most COVID-19 deaths] received test results for residents, the regulators found, exacerbating the spread of the virus throughout the month of April.” Now more than 60% of the state’s deaths have been in these facilities, over 80% in some counties.

However, we must not forget that as dangerous as COVID-19 is to nursing home residents, it does not have a 100% fatality rate. According to Colorado Public Radio, the state has tested “nearly 1,900 asymptomatic staff and residents at six large elder-care facilities since April 19.”

Yet at the same time, we know that 65% of nursing home residents die every year within a year of admission and 52% within six months. Overall, roughly one-quarter of the approximately 2.8 million annual fatalities in this country occur in a senior care facility. That’s nearly 13,500 a week. We also know that once COVID-19 gets into a nursing home, it’s likely that a majority, if not nearly all of the residents, will test positive. It’s therefore inconceivable that those coding the deaths are not liberally adding in those who died from a stroke, heart attack, or Alzheimer’s (“old age”) simply because they tested positive.

Remember, included in the state’s senior care facility death numbers (colloquially referred to as “nursing home deaths”) are also hospices. The Illinois health director admitted that “if you were in hospice and had already been given a few weeks to live and then you also were found to have COVID, that would be counted as a COVID death.”

As I reported last week, the number of New York long-term care facility deaths that are listed as “presumed” are greater than the number of “confirmed” deaths, yet the presumed numbers are all included in the national tally you see on the news every day.

Also, remember, the presumed numbers are for those who did not test positive. However, there is less focus on those who did test positive, contracted an asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic illness, and sadly, like so many in hospices or nursing homes, passed away from a myriad of other causes. Every one of those people is being listed as a confirmed COVID-19 death!

Thus, at this point, according to the state data, we can say with certainty that at least 40,000 of the 80,000 reported national COVID-19 deaths were recorded among nursing home patients and that a certain number of overall deaths have been inflated, potentially dramatically so in nursing homes. If you take New York City and its surrounding environs plus nursing homes out of the equation, most of the rest of the country experienced a plague less devastating than the 2018 flu season, which killed 60,000. And the overwhelming majority of the remaining casualties had multiple co-morbidities.

The reason our government is not putting out more precise and accurate data is because if it did, it would be a national scandal that we destroyed an entire country for a crisis largely confined to nursing homes. The people would know that the same politicians who spent months locking down every playground for people and in places where there is near-zero threat of death forgot to put the fire out where it was actually raging.

[COMMENT: One always wonders how non-partisan the CDC is with Dr. Nancy Messonnier, director of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases branch, being the sister of disgraced former deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein]
 
Last edited:

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKM4MIrfr4k
23:37min
COVID-19 Rapid Tests Demo & Q/A with E25Bio Co-Founder Dr. Herrera (At Home Antigen Tests)

•Aug 12, 2020


MedCram - Medical Lectures Explained CLEARLY

Simple and cheap COVID-19 tests that provide rapid results (15 min.) have been called a possible "game-changer" to curb the pandemic and allow schools and stores to open safely. Our guest today is Bobby Brooke Herrera, Ph.D. - the Co-Founder of a small company based in Massachusetts called E25Bio. Back on February 26, 2020, E25Bio had its inexpensive COVID-19 antigen test developed, but his company has run into numerous hurdles - lack of guidance and reasonable standards from the FDA, limited federal investment into public health testing strategies, and challenging pathways to production and distribution. Dr. Herrera gives a demo of their simple test that requires a simple nasal swab, plastic tube, a paper strip, and no additional processing. He also discusses how tests like this could be distributed and utilized to quickly curtail the spread of COVID-19. (This video was recorded August 12, 2020).

LINKS / REFERENCES: More about Dr. Bobby Brooke Herrera - Co-Founder of E25Bio | https://e25bio.com/bobby-brooke-herrera MedCram Update 98 for context on rapid paper antigen tests and Dr. Mina's research | https://youtu.be/h7Sv_pS8MgQ 5-Minute Sharable Video About At-Home Rapid Tests | https://www.medcram.com/courses/antig... Boston Globe Article about E25Bio | https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/03/3...
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kso8pPPuc6E
2:13:25 min
President Trump Holds a News Conference

•Streamed live 2 hours ago


The White House

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjLCI3Y0eyU
35:39 min
President Trump Participates in Kids First: Getting America’s Children Safely Back to School
•Streamed live 4 hours ago


Right Side Broadcasting Network

Wednesday, August 12, 2020: Watch Live as President Trump Participates in Kids First: Getting America’s Children Safely Back to School
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Capitol Alert
‘Extremely frustrating:’ How tech breakdowns are hurting Gavin Newsom’s coronavirus response
BY SOPHIA BOLLAG AND

MICHAEL WILNER
AUGUST 12, 2020 05:00 AM , UPDATED 10 HOURS 46 MINUTES A

At a press conference Monday, August 10, California Gov. Gavin Newsom discusses California's longterm IT problems. BY CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR


Before he became California governor last year, Gavin Newsom built his reputation as a tech-savvy Bay Area politician, who wrote a book arguing government should follow Silicon Valley’s lead and embrace new technology.

But five months into the biggest crisis of his governorship, technology problems have become major stumbling blocks to his coronavirus strategy.

The state’s unemployment system has been mired in delays, leaving thousands of people desperate for aid checks in limbo.

California’s health insurance program for low-income residents has dropped coverage for thousands of people due to computer errors.

And last week state officials announced they had vastly undercounted coronavirus case data due to a series of human mistakes and IT glitches.

None of the problems have easy fixes.

“The magnitude of challenges with IT here in the state require a stubborn, long-term effort,” Newsom said at a press conference this week. “It took us decades to get into this place, but we’re now accountable.”

The technology breakdowns Newsom faces in the midst of a global public health crisis follow California’s well-documented history of disappointing results from its tech investments. Those include a $1 billion accounting program that took 16 years to implement and a $90 million payroll upgrade the state abandoned as unworkable.

Newsom called attention to the state’s tech record soon after his inauguration, when he lamented at a press conference that the Department of Motor Vehicles in 2019 didn’t accept credit card payments at its field offices.

“In the private sector, you’re used to having these upgrades to the latest and greatest, and that’s just not the case in government,” said Elizabeth Ashford, who served as an adviser to former governors Arnold Schwarzenegger and Jerry Brown.

Newsom has long capitalized on his connections to California’s technology industry and promoted initiatives to modernize government. In 2019, he created a new Office of Digital Innovation.

When COVID-19 struck, he promised data would drive his decisions and eventually made the state’s data publicly available on coding website GitHub.
But the recent COVID-19 setbacks show the state’s IT problems are deeply entrenched.

“California’s interesting, because they are the world’s leader in innovation in the private sector in a lot of ways,” said Matt Lira, special assistant to President Donald Trump for innovation. “But that doesn’t mean that they’re immune to these kinds of challenges in the public sector.”

Lira was among the experts Newsom spoke with for his 2013 book “Citizenville: How to Take the Town Square Digital and Reinvent Government,” which advocated for a more technology-focused mindset in government. Lira recalled speaking “at length” with Newsom for the book.

“He has a fairly intuitive understanding of the nature of the problem,” Lira said. “It’s something he’s definitely passionate about.”

Here are the main challenges in front of Newsom in the coronavirus outbreak.

COVID-19 DATA STALLED
Last week, nearly 300,000 coronavirus test results were blocked from reaching the state’s infectious disease database after a series of technology glitches and human errors. Without complete data, no one knew how many Californians were testing positive or who many of the infected people were.

For days, county officials didn’t know how much data was missing, although they suspected it could be as much as half. That hampered already struggling contact tracing efforts and stymied decisions about reopening schools and businesses. State officials decided they didn’t have enough information to move counties on and off the state’s monitoring list, which determines which businesses a county must shut down.

The Newsom administration has created temporary fixes, Health and Human Services Secretary Dr. Mark Ghaly announced Friday. But the underlying issue, that the state’s disease tracking system wasn’t built to handle a pandemic’s worth of data, remains.

To fix that, the state will build a whole new system with greater capacity, Ghaly said.

“It’s extremely frustrating for the governor,” said Nate Ballard, a Democratic consultant and Newsom confidant who worked in Newsom’s San Francisco mayoral office. “Gavin Newsom has a 21st Century outlook on how technology should serve his constituents, and he has inherited a 20th Century state government technology apparatus.”

UNEMPLOYMENT CHECKS DELAYED
During the pandemic, a tsunami of unemployment claims has overwhelmed California’s Employment Development Department.

Although the department has processed more than 9 million claims, many Californians who lost jobs have spent countless hours trying unsuccessfully to call the department’s hotlines. Many are still waiting for their money.

“Every hour of every day, my office receives calls from constituents who are draining their life savings, going into extreme debt, figuring out how to pay rent and put food on the table because they are unable to get an answer from this antiquated IT system,” said Assemblyman David Chiu, D-San Francisco. “The typical constituent experience is they make dozens if not hundreds of calls into a call center and can’t get through.”

Chiu, who serves on the Assembly budget committee that oversees the state’s technology contracts, said all the problems originate with the department’s 30-year old IT system.

The program relies on a 60-year-old computer language so archaic most engineers who know how to work with it are retired, Chiu said. At a recent hearing on the system’s problems, Chiu read a decade-old report describing the same problems -- outstripped capacity, jammed phone lines, staffers unable to answer specific questions -- plaguing the department during the Great Recession.

Newsom has said the unemployment delays are unacceptable. He directed the department to hire thousands more workers to help respond more quickly. He also launched a “strike team” to modernize the department’s systems.

THOUSANDS DROPPED FROM MEDI-CAL
In the meantime, computer system errors have dis-enrolled tens of thousands of people from Medi-Cal, the state’s health insurance program for low-income residents.

Newsom issued an executive order March 17 to ensure that people wouldn’t lose Medi-Cal coverage during the pandemic, but the state’s automated systems have ended coverage for some Californians since then anyway, officials have acknowledged.

California’s Department of Health Care Services recently sent notices to about 200,000 people informing them that they may have been incorrectly dropped from the program, department spokesman Anthony Cava said.

Some of those discontinuances were appropriate because the beneficiary died, left California or asked to be removed, Cava said. But other cases were mistakes, and the state is actively working “to quickly identify and restore all remaining beneficiaries who may have been erroneously discontinued,” Cava wrote in an email.

The state notified some counties about the errors in late June, according to a copy of the memo obtained by The Bee. Despite the governor’s executive order, the state wasn’t able to stop its computer system from automatically disenrolling some Medi-Cal recipients, according to the memo.

The state is still working to determine how many people were affected, Cava said.

Lawyers who work with low-income clients continue to hear from people who have lost coverage even after the counties were notified, said David Kane, a lawyer who works for the Western Center on Law and Poverty. The state should be working harder to fix the problem, which is leaving vulnerable people without coverage in the middle of the pandemic, Kane said.

“It’s August, and they still haven’t completely fixed it,” Kane said.
 

AlaskaSue

North to the Future
We're this far into it and I finally know people verified to have cv-19: my DIL's parents. We are friends and they live just a half-hour from me in the town where I have my twice-weekly weight training sessions. He's doing well, she is struggling but home to recover. Both in their 70s.

Alaska's stats went up a lot this summer - mostly due to seasonal workers in canneries and fisheries. Stats since the beginning:
Statewide total hospitalized currently: 31
Statewide total deaths: 27
Statewide positive, both ill and recovered: 3,880
 

Weft and Warp

Senior Member
New Study Finds Potential Reason Why COVID-19 Occurs Less In Children
Profile picture for user Tyler Durden
by Tyler Durden
Wed, 08/12/2020 - 06:00

Authored by Paula Liu via The Epoch Times,
The reason COVID-19 occurs less frequently in children could be due to the lack of a certain enzyme, researchers have found.

This new study detailed in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) on May 20, discovered that the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), which grows in abundance as the individual grows, might be the reason that less than two percent of all individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 - the virus that causes the COVID-19 disease - are children.
Researchers had suspected that COVID-19 susceptibility could be linked to the amount of gene expression of ACE2 seen in the nasal cavity, given that the enzyme acts as a receptor to allow the SARS-CoV-2 virus to pass into the body.
To investigate this potential link, researchers looked for a relationship between the two - the level of gene expression of ACE2 in the nose and COVID-19 infection - by taking nasal swabs from 305 people involved in an asthma study. Researchers hypothesized that the lower the levels of enzyme gene expression, the less likely it is a person will be infected by COVID-19.
Researchers said they chose to swab the nose because it is one of the first access points for SARS-CoV-2 to infect an individual.
Samples were taken from both asthmatic (49.8 percent) and non-asthmatic patients. The 305 people involved in the study were between four to 60 years of age.
Researchers said they found a clear association between ACE2 expression and age - opening up a possible explanation as to why most children, who tend to have lower levels of enzyme expression, are less susceptible to COVID-19.


Supinda Bunyavanich, professor of Genetics and Genomic Sciences and Paediatrics at Mount Sinai, said in a press release that the study found “that there are low levels of ACE2 expression in the nasal passages of younger children, and this ACE2 level increases with age into adulthood.
“This might explain why children have been largely spared in the pandemic,” Bunyavanich said.


Here's a link to that study published in Jama:

May 20, 2020
Nasal Gene Expression of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 in Children and Adults
Supinda Bunyavanich, MD, MPH1; Anh Do, PhD2; Alfin Vicencio, MD1
Author Affiliations Article Information
JAMA. 2020;323(23):2427-2429. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.8707
COVID-19 Resource Center

Children account for less than 2% of identified cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).1,2 It is hypothesized that the lower risk among children is due to differential expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2),3 the receptor that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) uses for host entry.4 We investigated ACE2 gene expression in the nasal epithelium of children and adults.

Methods
We conducted a retrospective examination of nasal epithelium from individuals aged 4 to 60 years encountered within the Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York, during 2015-2018. Samples were collected from individuals with and without asthma for research on nasal biomarkers of asthma. The study was approved by the Mount Sinai institutional review board. Written informed consent was obtained from participants (or their parents for minors). Nasal epithelium was collected using a cytology brush that was immediately placed in RNA stabilization fluid and stored at −80 °C. RNA was isolated within 6 months. RNA samples were checked for quality and sequenced as a single batch in 2018. Sequence data processing included sequence alignment and normalization of gene expression counts across genes and samples.
Given the role of ACE2 in SARS-CoV-2 host entry,4 ACE2 gene expression was the focus of this study. Linear regression models with and without adjustment for covariates (sex and asthma) were built with ACE2 gene expression in log2 counts per million as the dependent variable and age group as the independent variable using R software, version 3.6.0 (R Foundation). Age was categorized into the following groups reflecting developmental life stages: younger children (aged <10 years), older children (aged 10-17 years), young adults (aged 18-24 years), and adults (aged ≥25 years). Two-sided tests and a significance threshold of P ≤ .05 were used. Trend pattern was evaluated using polynomial orthogonal contrasts.
Results
The cohort of 305 individuals aged 4 to 60 years was balanced with regard to sex (48.9% male). Because the cohort had been recruited to study biomarkers of asthma, 49.8% had asthma.
We found age-dependent ACE2 gene expression in nasal epithelium (Figure). ACE2 gene expression was lowest (mean log2 counts per million, 2.40; 95% CI, 2.07-2.72) in younger children (n = 45) and increased with age, with mean log2 counts per million of 2.77 (95% CI, 2.64-2.90) for older children (n = 185), 3.02 (95% CI, 2.78-3.26) for young adults (n = 46), and 3.09 (95% CI, 2.83-3.35) for adults (n = 29).
Linear regression with ACE2 gene expression as the dependent variable and age group as the independent variable showed that compared with younger children, ACE2 gene expression was significantly higher in older children (P = .01), young adults (P < .001), and adults (P = .001) (Figure). As the distributions of sex and asthma varied among the age groups, a linear regression model adjusted for sex and asthma was built that also showed significant adjusted associations (P ≤ .05) between ACE2 expression and age group. Regression (β) coefficients for age groups from the unadjusted and adjusted models are shown in the Table. These regression coefficients indicate the difference in ACE2 expression (in log2 counts per million) between a given age group and the group of children younger than 10 years. Tests for trend using polynomial orthogonal contrasts indicated a significant linear trend for change in ACE2 expression with advancing age group (P ≤ .05).
Discussion
The results from this study show age-dependent expression of ACE2 in nasal epithelium, the first point of contact for SARS-CoV-2 and the human body. Covariate-adjusted models showed that the positive association between ACE2 gene expression and age was independent of sex and asthma. Lower ACE2 expression in children relative to adults may help explain why COVID-19 is less prevalent in children.3 A limitation of this study is that the sample did not include individuals older than 60 years.
Few studies have examined the relationship between ACE2 in the airway and age. A study of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from 92 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome reported no association between ACE2 protein activity and age,5 but epithelial gene expression was not examined, and ACE2 protein may be variably shed into bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Furthermore, the lung and nasal environments are distinct, with known differences in gene expression.6 This study provides novel results on ACE2 gene expression in nasal epithelium and its relationship with age.
Section Editor: Jody W. Zylke, MD, Deputy Editor.
Article Information
Corresponding Author: Supinda Bunyavanich, MD, MPH, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Ave #1498, New York, NY 10029 (supinda@post.harvard.edu).
Accepted for Publication: May 7, 2020.
Published Online: May 20, 2020. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.8707
Author Contributions: Dr Bunyavanich had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.


References
1.
Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020;323(13):1239-1242. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.2648
ArticlePubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
CDC COVID-19 Response Team. Coronavirus disease 2019 in children—United States, February 12–April 2, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(14):422-426. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6914e4PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Dong Y, Mo X, Hu Y, et al. Epidemiology of COVID-19 among children in China. Pediatrics. 2020;145(4):e20200702. doi:10.1542/peds.2020-0702PubMedGoogle Scholar
4.
Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell. 2020;181(2):271-280.e8. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Schouten LR, van Kaam AH, Kohse F, et al; MARS Consortium. Age-dependent differences in pulmonary host responses in ARDS: a prospective observational cohort study. Ann Intensive Care. 2019;9(1):55. doi:10.1186/s13613-019-0529-4PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Chun Y, Do A, Grishina G, et al. Integrative study of the upper and lower airway microbiome and transcriptome in asthma. JCI Insight. 2020;5(5):e133707. doi:10.1172/jci.insight.133707PubMedGoogle Scholar
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1DiF7zYMbnQ
17:56 min
Oestrogen and COVID severity in women

•Aug 13, 2020


Dr. John Campbell

Men and older women have been shown to be at higher risk of adverse outcomes https://covid.joinzoe.com/post/post-m... https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.11... Variables Menopausal status COCP (Combined Oral Contraceptive Pill) HRT (Hormone Replacement Therapy) 152,637 women for menopause status 295,689 for COCP use 151,193 for HRT use Results corrected for Age Smoking BMI

Results Post-menopausal women aged 40-60 years More diagnosed cases More symptoms Trend (but not significant) to increased disease severity Women aged 18-45 years taking COCP Significantly lower prevalence of COVID-19 diagnosis Reduction in hospital attendance (P = 0.023) Post-menopausal women using HRT Increased rates of COVID-19 No increase in hospitalization
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9stkNlBsYzM
8:25 min

Second Stimulus Check Update & Stimulus News Thursday August 13
•Aug 13, 2020


ClearValue Tax


This is your Second Stimulus Check update, stimulus package update, and stimulus check 2 update and daily show as of Thursday, August 13th. We cover the second stimulus check, the stimulus update, and also the next stimulus package. The stimulus package that passed under the Trump Administration earlier in March of 2020 was the HEROES Act. We discuss the stimulus check, the second stimulus check, stimulus unemployment, the SBA PPP Loan, the EIDL loan, the forgivable loan, and the upcoming stimulus package. We hope you enjoy this second stimulus check update.
 

inskanoot

Veteran Member

Time: 47:44

Dr Richard Bartlett: Proven CV-19 Cure - Budesonide Treatment

Texas doctor has prescribed a steroidal inhaler (recommended with a nebulizer) for his COVID patients. All have gotten better, and felt better with the first treatment. It is a cure and no vaccine is needed. Budesonide has been on the market for decades and is safe enough for use on newborns. The full course costs $200.


Dr. Richard Bartlett | Bio | COVID Silver Bullet
Bio – Dr. Richard Bartlett

Budesonide | Drug Profile | FDA Approval February 14, 1994

Budesonide - DrugBank
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
[A bit glitchy, so gave two options]

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5dZzC27ZLs
LIVE
President Trump Holds a News Conference
•Started streaming 57 minutes ago


The White House
__________________
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x37Gw2kY5dk
LIVE
Watch LIVE: -President Trump Holds a News Conference From Bedminster, NJ - 8/15/20
•Started streaming 37 minutes ago


Right Side Broadcasting Network

Saturday, August 15, 2020: Watch Live as President Donald J. Trump holds a news conference from the Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster, NJ.
 

Mixin

Veteran Member
Indiana finally got their LTCF dashboard up and running. It's on the same page as the regular board and they've made it user-friendly. They included an interactive map with all the facilities and their numbers.

Total Resident Positive Cases: 6,664
Total Resident Deaths: 1,753
Total Staff Positive Cases: 2,945
Total Staff Deaths: 11
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap

Time: 47:44

Dr Richard Bartlett: Proven CV-19 Cure - Budesonide Treatment

Texas doctor has prescribed a steroidal inhaler (recommended with a nebulizer) for his COVID patients. All have gotten better, and felt better with the first treatment. It is a cure and no vaccine is needed. Budesonide has been on the market for decades and is safe enough for use on newborns. The full course costs $200.


Dr. Richard Bartlett | Bio | COVID Silver Bullet
Bio – Dr. Richard Bartlett

Budesonide | Drug Profile | FDA Approval February 14, 1994

Budesonide - DrugBank

Of course the evil ptb made sure to put up contradictory websites trying to say that this doesn't work.

Praying for the truth to be known and acted upon, far and wide, and for the lies to be exposed.
 

Weft and Warp

Senior Member
CDC's Fall Warning: 'Worst Fall Ever" and the Vaccine

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kuA8NdQGXMU&list=TLPQMTUwODIwMjD0-ZD37lw9Pg&index=2

(about 12 min) The Patriot Nurse


"In this informative video, Patriot Nurse discuss the warning issued from the CDC this week, calling the upcoming Fall infections disease season likely to be the worst we've ever seen. Many are advocating for vaccine compliance on the heels of it. We evaluate this and seek to build a plan "
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmT7ErQWk4g
3:25 min
President Trump: Vaccine distribution will prioritize vulnerable groups
•Aug 16, 2020


One America News Network

President Trump recently announced which populations are likely to have first access to a future COVID-19 vaccine. One America’s Hans Hubbard reports.

___________________________________

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOEWipCViT4
2:37 min

Calif. Gov. Newsom coming under fire for pandemic response

•Aug 16, 2020

One America News Network

Amid delayed coronavirus lab results, Californians are questioning their governor’s leadership on a productive pandemic response. One America’s Grayce Rust explains.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IKGRL-FstY
3:52 min
Coronavirus and meat: Lawsuit raises concern over COVID-19 and meat processing
•Aug 15, 2020


Yahoo Finance


Yahoo Finance's Alexis Keenan reports on a non-profit physician’s group asking a federal court to immediately order meat and poultry processing plants to test their products for COVID-19, and make the results of their tests public. This segment originally aired on August 13, 2020.
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
CORONAVIRUS’S HIDDEN THREAT

When SpaceX begins its beta testing in the northern United States and southern Canada later this summer, the single biggest obstacle to recognizing its effects on humans will be COVID-19. Because no matter how many people sicken or die in that part of the world, it will be blamed on the coronavirus.

As I pointed out in a previous newsletter, the pandemic began with 5G. 5G came to Wuhan shortly before the outbreak of COVID-19 there. 5G came to New York City streetlamps shortly before the outbreak of COVID-19 there. COVID-19 deprives the blood of oxygen, while radio waves deprive the cells of oxygen. COVID-19, alone, is just a respiratory virus like the common cold. But together with 5G, it is deadly. To deal with COVID-19 effectively, society must first recognize the harm done to the body by radio waves. 5G is radio waves on steroids.
ZrJ_pjL8DpuS3lBiiaqXdMEiReBtlNnVC8qdz2Qnx515H01Q4VsKq002NVwX50VuxrWpKAhv45U9ow5vMFpvMTaPOUDpN7SmWnYOv9sH0h-RrVyFRY-9Fl6y1tAVqa0zTRl9Zy14wHJxx7L1phnB_pSGN6ouc9h_GYNualWzu1nTMicd4uwBcGzIPpjOr2wOKxU45KsEtg=s0-d-e1-ft
This worker’s death was not caused by hot weather, as was reported by the media

Instead of acknowledging the harm from radio waves, society is tearing its fabric apart by instituting measures that are protecting no one and are instead sickening and killing people. I will mention just one of those measures here: facial masks.

As a person who went to medical school, I was shocked when I read Neil Orr’s study, published in 1981 in the Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. Dr. Orr was a surgeon in the Severalls Surgical Unit in Colchester. And for six months, from March through August 1980, the surgeons and staff in that unit decided to see what would happen if they did not wear masks during surgeries. They wore no masks for six months, and compared the rate of surgical wound infections from March through August 1980 with the rate of wound infections from March through August of the previous four years. And they discovered, to their amazement, that when nobody wore masks during surgeries, the rate of wound infections was less than half what it was when everyone wore masks. Their conclusion: “It would appear that minimum contamination can best be achieved by not wearing a mask at all” and that wearing a mask during surgery “is a standard procedure that could be abandoned.”

I was so amazed that I scoured the medical literature, sure that this was a fluke and that newer studies must show the utility of masks in preventing the spread of disease. But to my surprise the medical literature for the past forty-five years has been consistent: masks are useless in preventing the spread of disease and, if anything, are unsanitary objects that themselves spread bacteria and viruses.
  • Ritter et al., in 1975, found that “the wearing of a surgical face mask had no effect upon the overall operating room environmental contamination.”

  • Ha’eri and Wiley, in 1980, applied human albumin microspheres to the interior of surgical masks in 20 operations. At the end of each operation, wound washings were examined under the microscope. “Particle contamination of the wound was demonstrated in all experiments.”

  • Laslett and Sabin, in 1989, found that caps and masks were not necessary during cardiac catheterization. “No infections were found in any patient, regardless of whether a cap or mask was used,” they wrote. Sjøl and Kelbaek came to the same conclusion in 2002.

  • In Tunevall’s 1991 study, a general surgical team wore no masks in half of their surgeries for two years. After 1,537 operations performed with masks, the wound infection rate was 4.7%, while after 1,551 operations performed without masks, the wound infection rate was only 3.5%.
  • A review by Skinner and Sutton in 2001 concluded that “The evidence for discontinuing the use of surgical face masks would appear to be stronger than the evidence available to support their continued use.
  • Lahme et al., in 2001, wrote that “surgical face masks worn by patients during regional anaesthesia, did not reduce the concentration of airborne bacteria over the operation field in our study. Thus they are dispensable.”

  • Figueiredo et al., in 2001, reported that in five years of doing peritoneal dialysis without masks, rates of peritonitis in their unit were no different than rates in hospitals where masks were worn.

  • Bahli did a systematic literature review in 2009 and found that “no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative wound infection was observed between masks groups and groups operated with no masks.

  • Surgeons at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, recognizing the lack of evidence supporting the use of masks, ceased requiring them in 2010 for anesthesiologists and other non-scrubbed personnel in the operating room. “Our decision to no longer require routine surgical masks for personnel not scrubbed for surgery is a departure from common practice. But the evidence to support this practice does not exist,” wrote Dr. Eva Sellden.

  • Webster et al., in 2010, reported on obstetric, gynecological, general, orthopaedic, breast and urological surgeries performed on 827 patients. All non-scrubbed staff wore masks in half the surgeries, and none of the non-scrubbed staff wore masks in half the surgeries. Surgical site infections occurred in 11.5% of the Mask group, and in only 9.0% of the No Mask group.

  • Lipp and Edwards reviewed the surgical literature in 2014 and found “no statistically significant difference in infection rates between the masked and unmasked group in any of the trials.” Vincent and Edwards updated this review in 2016 and the conclusion was the same.

  • Carøe, in a 2014 review based on four studies and 6,006 patients, wrote that “none of the four studies found a difference in the number of post-operative infections whether you used a surgical mask or not.”

  • Salassa and Swiontkowski, in 2014, investigated the necessity of scrubs, masks and head coverings in the operating room and concluded that “there is no evidence that these measures reduce the prevalence of surgical site infection.”

  • Da Zhou et al., reviewing the literature in 2015, concluded that “there is a lack of substantial evidence to support claims that facemasks protect either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination.”
Schools in China are now prohibiting students from wearing masks while exercising. Why? Because it was killing them. It was depriving them of oxygen and it was killing them. At least three children died during Physical Education classes -- two of them while running on their school’s track while wearing a mask. And a 26-year-old man suffered a collapsed lung after running two and a half miles while wearing a mask.

Mandating masks has not kept death rates down anywhere. The 20 U.S. states that have never ordered people to wear face masks indoors and out have dramatically lower COVID-19 death rates than the 30 states that have mandated masks. Most of the no-mask states have COVID-19 death rates below 20 per 100,000 population, and none have a death rate higher than 55. All 13 states that have death rates higher 55 are states that have required the wearing of masks in all public places. It has not protected them.

“We are living in an atmosphere of permanent illness, of meaningless separation,” writes Benjamin Cherry in the Summer 2020 issue of New View magazine. A separation that is destroying lives, souls, and nature.
_____________
* from Christopher Fry, A Sleep of Prisoners, 1951.
Arthur Firstenberg
August 11, 2020

 

Troke

On TB every waking moment
Don’t just look at covid-19 fatality rates. Look at people who survive — but don’t entirely recover.
Opinion by
Megan McArdle
Columnist
August 16, 2020 at 8:00 a.m. EDT

During the first few months of the coronavirus pandemic, the United States became a nation of novice hermits and amateur epidemiologists. The former battened down the hatches; the latter frantically tried to assess just how much danger we were hiding from. Between sourdough seminars and Zoom meetings, Twitter PhD theses were composed and defended seeking to pin down the “infection fatality rate”: the percentage of infected people, including the undiagnosed, who died from covid-19.

In those early innings, good-faith estimates ranged as high as 3 percent and as low as 0.1 percent. As we got more information, however, the plausible estimates narrowed, and is probably in the range of 0.5 to 1.0 percent.

But with more data, something else has become clear: We’re focusing too much on fatality rates and not enough on the people who don’t die, but don’t entirely recover, either.

Anecdotal reports of these people abound. At least seven elite college athletes have developed myocarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle that can have severe consequences, including sudden death. An Austrian doctor who treats scuba divers reported that six patients, who had only mild covid-19 infections, seem to have significant and permanent lung damage. Social media communities sprang up of people who are still suffering, months after they were infected, with everything from chronic fatigue and “brain fog” to chest pain and recurrent fevers.

Now, data is coming in behind the anecdotes, and while it’s preliminary, it’s also “concerning,” says Clyde Yancy, chief of cardiology at Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine. A recent study from Germany followed up with 100 recovered patients, two-thirds of whom were never sick enough to be hospitalized. Seventy-eight showed signs of cardiac involvement, and MRIs indicated that 60 of them had ongoing cardiac inflammation, even though it had been at least two months since their diagnosis.

If these results turned out to be representative, they would utterly change the way we think about covid-19: not as a disease that kills a tiny percentage of patients, mostly the elderly or the obese, the hypertensive or diabetic, but one that attacks the heart in most of the people who get it, even if they don’t feel very sick. And maybe their lungs, kidneys or brains, too.

It’s too early to say what the long-term prognosis of those attacks would be; with other viruses that infect the heart, most acute, symptomatic myocarditis cases eventually resolve without long-term clinical complications. Though Leslie Cooper, a cardiologist at the Mayo Clinic, estimates that 20 to 30 percent of patients who experience acute viral myocarditis end up with some sort of long-term heart disease including recurrent chest pain or shortness of breath, which can be progressive and debilitating. When I asked whether the risk of long-term disability from covid-19 could potentially end up being greater than the risk of death, Cooper said: “Yes, absolutely.”

Those patients would, on average, be much younger than the ones who are dying; the median age in the German study was 49. These are patients with many years of life to lose, either to disability or early death. And there are disturbing findings from much younger patients; a study of 186 children who had MIS-C, the (thankfully rare) inflammatory syndrome that can occur with pediatric covid-19, showed 15 had developed aneurysms of the coronary artery.

But you can’t generalize from such small studies, especially since covid-19 is rapidly becoming the most-studied disease in human history; if we regularly put patients with other viral infections through cardiac MRIs, what might their hearts look like a few months in?

We desperately need larger, more comprehensive studies, and, thankfully, they’re in the works — one of the largest and the best will follow 10,000 British patients. But these take time to set up, and as genetic epidemiologist Louise Wain, a researcher on the British study, told me ruefully, “No one warned us a year ago that we were going to have a pandemic.” She hopes to have the 1,000th patient enrolled by September, which is amazingly fast, but still not quick enough for policymakers and individuals who have to decide whether to leave our hermitages.

“All of us, me included, have tired,” says Yancy. And, in recent months, our laser focus on fatality rates has offered at least the young and healthy what seems like a beacon of hope. Without hard data, it has been easy to dismiss reports of longer-term complications as anecdote, hysteria or media hype. But at this stage, the absence of data isn’t proof that those effects aren’t real.

Of course, even if the risks are higher than we thought, we still must make trade-offs — crops must be picked and kids educated, pandemic or no. But whatever your personal cost-benefit analysis was, it should become more conservative with those potential long-term complications factored in. At the very least, says Yancy, “Wear the mask. When you think about all these ramifications, wear the mask.”

I have been ranting about this since April. Are there any after affects? And guess what? Somebody looked and there were.
 

blackjeep

The end times are here.
No Lie Is Too Big For Scientists
RT 8:59
This video shows how science has been corrupted to conform to the sponsor's or government's agenda.
Very interesting, it peels the layers of deceit off the covid mess. Don't believe (or post?) the MSM lies!

 
Top