CRIME MA: Mom accused of sending her husband on an errand so she could kill her 3 kids before paralyzing herself by jumping out a window, appears in court

The 56 year old woman charged with possible jury tampering..

She fits the AWFUL label.... perfectly!

FIRST PHOTOS: 56-Year-Old Nutcase Dawn Light Arraigned in Court for Intimidating Lindsey Clancy Jurors – Pleads Not Guilty​

As The Gateway Pundit reported earlier today, Dawn Light from Sutton, Massachusetts, was taken into custody at approximately 3:40 p.m. outside the courthouse in Plymouth, just minutes after jurors were dismissed for the day without reaching a verdict.

Massachusetts State Police charged Light with one count of intimidation of a witness, juror, or person furnishing information in connection with criminal proceedings. She is expected to be arraigned on Wednesday.

According to the Boston Herald, Light allegedly attempted to photograph the jury as its members left the courthouse.

1788364600105.png

Light told one reporter she only wanted to see Lindsey.

This is Dawn Light, 56, the retired RN arrested on charge of Witness/Juror intimidation for allegedly filming #lindsayclancy jurors in restricted courthouse lot. “I only wanted to see Lindsay” Light told me. Denied recording jurors @boston25 pic.twitter.com/TUSzFlFgMm

 
My guess, this ends up as a hung jury in the next day or two. Dollars to donuts, there's a few AWFULs on the jury, that just won't convict her..

Then, this whole process starts again.... but I think, next time, trying to get an impartial jury will be REALLY tough, since the whole country seems to have an opinion...
 
My guess, this ends up as a hung jury in the next day or two. Dollars to donuts, there's a few AWFULs on the jury, that just won't convict her..

Then, this whole process starts again.... but I think, next time, trying to get an impartial jury will be REALLY tough, since the whole country seems to have an opinion...
They were speculating on the radio whether if the jury does end up in a Hung jury, the DA might offer some sort of plea deal.
 
After my 4th child, when he was 6 weeks or so, something weird happened to me. This was my 4th child. They all got a weird horrible flu, the bad pukey kind. Every 36 hours another came down with it. Suddenly I kept picturing my kids trying to kill me, then my mind was racing with all kinds of weird things. I knew something was wrong with me, but didn't know what. As soon as my husband came home I handed him the baby and went to the hospital.8 got booked and they wanted to start me on all kinds of psych medicines and put me in a room. I just happened to call my midwife to ask her to let my husband know what was going on and she told me not to let them do anything till she got there. She came in my room, looked at me and said " you have post partem depression" The doctor was like, ohhh. She took me home, put me in her trailer. Put me on a Saint Johns wort tincture and Valerian. Also Flax seed oil. Made me e drink lots of water and brought me meals. In two days I felt so much better. May not be the same for each woman, we are all different. I never had the want to harm my children, but I can see how it would definitely mess with your head, then compounded with the crap they want to get you on for the rest of your life. By the way, it's caused by the sudden drop of pregnancy hormones after childbirth. It happens at the 6 week mark. Watch! It can be drastic to some woman.
Also, a lady I know from works daughter had this. They put her in the psych ward overnight and started her on psych meds, they never checked on her and she had a reaction to the medicine and Died, leaving a tiny baby. There's a reason I hate our medical systems. I've seen some crazy things
 
, a lady I know from works daughter had this. They put her in the psych ward overnight and started her on psych meds, they never checked on her and she had a reaction to the medicine and Died, leaving a tiny baby. There's a reason I hate our medical systems. I've seen some crazy things
The issue of the meds is a complicating factor factor here. If she could be found guilty but insane; sentenced to life in an insane asylum, I think that's the best outcome. But a lot of work needs to be done in regards to the meds that she was on.
 
https://twitter.com/CBSNews/status/2095221201753027059

CBS News

@CBSNews



The jury in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial told Plymouth Superior Judge William Sullivan that they remain deadlocked after more than 27 hours of deliberations. It is the second time they have told the judge they cannot reach a verdict, leading Sullivan to read what is known as a final "dynamite" instruction.The nine women and three men have deliberating over the course of five days since getting the case in Plymouth Superior Court last Thursday. https://cbsn.ws/4cZMSGr
 
https://twitter.com/CBSNews/status/2095221201753027059
CBS News
@CBSNews



The jury in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial told Plymouth Superior Judge William Sullivan that they remain deadlocked after more than 27 hours of deliberations. It is the second time they have told the judge they cannot reach a verdict, leading Sullivan to read what is known as a final "dynamite" instruction.The nine women and three men have deliberating over the course of five days since getting the case in Plymouth Superior Court last Thursday. https://cbsn.ws/4cZMSGr
They sent a note to Sullivan Tuesday morning saying they were "unable to come to a unanimous decision," but he sent them back to keep discussing the case. They sent a similar note on Wednesday around 2:15 p.m.

In response, Sullivan read what are called the "Tuey-Rodriguez" instructions to the jury. After reading jurors the instruction, Sullivan sent them back out of the courtroom to continue deliberations.

In Massachusetts, this is a last resort instruction aimed at getting the jurors to reach a verdict. WBZ-TV's Kristina Rex, who has been in the courtroom for the trial, said the instruction is considered a "Hail Mary." This instruction, also known as the "dynamite charge," happened in Karen Read's first trial in 2024.

The instruction was also used during the Massachusetts trial of Emanuel Lopes in 2023. Lopes was charged with the murder of Weymouth Police Sgt. Michael Chesna in 2018. His first trial in 2023 ended in a mistrial due to a hung jury.

During the retrial in 2024, the jury told the judge three times that it was deadlocked. The jury eventually reached a unanimous guilty verdict after six days and 32 hours of deliberations.

Tuey-Rodriguez charge
 
The issue of the meds is a complicating factor factor here. If she could be found guilty but insane; sentenced to life in an insane asylum, I think that's the best outcome. But a lot of work needs to be done in regards to the meds that she was on.
I agree, the fact that she killed her own children. horrifies me, that the doctor's who were taking of her just threw her another pill instead of actually helping. I honestly don't know the circumstances but know that if PPD is not treated when it starts, it can turn into another monster. Also, if she was on as many meds as said, if she got off one for another or stopped taking one, it can cause some serious mental conditions, suicidal thoughts, thoughts of killing others, depression, I don't know about a million side affects.
 

Lindsay Clancy Jury Deadlocked Again; Insane Karen Arrested For 'Aggravated Intimidation' Of Jurors​

by Tyler Durden
Wednesday, Sep 02, 2026 - 04:05 PM
The jury in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial is once again deadlocked over whether the former mother of three should be given a pass due to hysteria and hormones.

The indecision followed five days of deliberations and two notes from jurors saying they could not agree. On Wednesday, Judge William Sullivan gave the panel a Tuey-Rodriguez instruction, Massachusetts' last-resort charge telling a deadlocked jury to reach a verdict or else it's an automatic mistrial.

Clancy, 36, a former labor-and-delivery nurse, was charged with three counts of first-degree murder in the January 24, 2023, deaths of her children
- Cora, 5; Dawson, 3; and Callan, 8 months - at the family's home in Duxbury. She has not disputed that she killed them. The question for the jury of nine women and three men was whether she was criminally responsible.

The killings​

Evidence at trial showed Clancy spent part of that morning on ordinary errands of motherhood, including a pediatrician visit for Cora and playing in the snow. She then asked her husband, Patrick Clancy, to leave for takeout and a pharmacy run. While he was gone, she strangled the three children with exercise bands in the basement. She cut her wrists and neck and jumped from a second-story window. The fall left her paralyzed from the waist down; she has appeared in court in a wheelchair.

Patrick found her injured in the yard, then found the children. Cora and Dawson were pronounced dead that day. Callan died days later. All three deaths were ruled ligature strangulation. Clancy later said a voice told her it was her last chance: kill the children so she could kill herself.

What the jury was asked to decide​


Prosecutors conceded she was mentally ill, but is still responsible for the killings. Assistant District Attorney Jennifer Sprague told jurors Clancy planned the killings, sent her husband out of the house, and checked how long the errands would take. They pointed to her functioning that day as proof she could form intent. Sprague called the killings "a choice." First-degree murder in Massachusetts can rest on deliberate premeditation, extreme atrocity or cruelty, or both. That conviction is life without parole.

Defense attorney Kevin Reddington argued she lacked criminal responsibility because of postpartum psychosis and bipolar illness, worsened by psychiatric medications and missed warning signs. Under Massachusetts law, the Commonwealth has to prove criminal responsibility beyond a reasonable doubt. Clancy had been hospitalized and discharged about three weeks before the killings.

Jurors heard more than 80 witnesses and saw more than 300 exhibits. For each child's death they could choose first-degree murder, second-degree murder, manslaughter, not guilty, or not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility. Second-degree murder is life with the possibility of parole. A lack-of-responsibility finding typically means commitment to a state psychiatric hospital with periodic reviews and no fixed release date. As noted above, a hung jury would be a mistrial.

Lindsay Clancy’s attorney says Clancy would not be able to “emotionally handle” another trial.

— Leading Report (@LeadingReport) September 2, 2026

Arrest outside the courthouse​

The deliberations themselves became part of the story. On Tuesday afternoon, as the jury left after reporting it could not agree, Massachusetts State Police arrested Dawn Light, 56, of Sutton, outside the Plymouth courthouse. She was charged with aggravated intimidation of a witness, juror, or person furnishing information in a criminal proceeding, and was arraigned Wednesday in Plymouth District Court, where she pleaded not guilty and was released on personal recognizance. Her attorney, Jennifer White, called the episode a complete misunderstanding and said Light had only wanted to see Clancy. The judge ordered Light to stay away from the courthouse, have no contact with jurors or witnesses, and release no photographs connected to the case.

Dawn Light, the retired nurse who is facing 20 years in prison for allegedly intimidating Clancy jurors, giggles when asked how she feels now that she's a celebrity.

Reporter: How do you feel that you're a celebrity now?
Zero remorse.pic.twitter.com/vdnvrQvO0R

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) September 2, 2026

Prosecutors said troopers were told someone may have been filming jurors in the courthouse parking lot. They found Light in a car parked in a restricted area and asked whether she was photographing anyone. "She was adamant she was not," Assistant District Attorney Nicole Piacentini said, according to NBC Boston. "She stated she was waiting to see if Lindsay Clancy would come out of the building." An initial search of Light's phone turned up nothing, investigators said, but the deleted folder held images of people later confirmed to be jurors, taken from her vantage point in the car.

Light told CT Insider she had been trying to record Clancy and lowered her phone when she realized the person on camera was not the defendant. She said a court employee asked for her license and phone; she handed over the license and refused the phone, and troopers were called. "That's the long and the short of it," she said. "I don't know how I intimidated anyone."

BREAKING: The woman accused of filming jurors in the Lindsay Clancy trial is in serious legal trouble.

Prosecutors say 56-year-old Dawn Light filmed jurors outside the courthouse and entered a restricted area despite a court order prohibiting jurors from being photographed or… pic.twitter.com/Pz0yx2sQ22

— Fox News (@FoxNews) September 2, 2026
Light is a retired nurse with no prior criminal history. Before deliberations resumed Wednesday, Sullivan questioned each juror individually at sidebar about whether they had seen or heard anything that would affect their ability to decide the case fairly.
 
I thought I heard, she was off most of the meds, and was trying to taper off. Plus, I believe there were a few witnesses that saw her and interacted with her that day, that said she was acting "normal"... so not someone in deep pyschosis...
I thought the one article said that the mother took her daughter to the pediatrician that morning and they had been playing out in the snow..........go figure.
 
Newsmax reporting right now, according to a court reporter, there are two young females on the jury, who just can't convict Clancy of murder.

COLOR ME SHOCKED

willing to bet my soul to a doughnut hole they went into the trial from its outset with the idea mommy dearest wasn't guilty. likely here are too kollitch indoctunatud kommies on a mission to spread their opinion of whut it meanz to be modurn wimmyn in todayz werld.
 
And, apparently also married...

Don't you feel sorry for her husband?? (or maybe her wife, we don't know yet)... LOL...

View attachment 619170

She looks JUST like the guy on the $10 million bill in Idiocracy.

iu
 
Just a quick one on the Clancy trial. I think it’s another energy harvesting psyop and it’s working because it’s keeping the normies entertained and arguing.
It’s almost identical to a case in Ireland from 2020. A mother of 3, also a paediatric nurse strangled her 3 kids while her husband was at work.
He showed up just as it was all over and acted very strangely ever since - courting the media and organising fund raisers within days
She was found not guilty by reason of insanity as she had postpartum, was on a cocktail of SSRI’s and had visited a hospital a week earlier and wasn’t admitted.
Exact same story. Both incidents happened on the same date:\
Morley: 24th Jan 2020
Clancy: 24th Jan 2023
Both women were nurses.Both husbands seem suspicious. Both countries divided on who’s to blame.
Both sets of kids were 2 boys and 1 girl and had the same initials:
Morley: Conor, Darragh and Carla (CDC)
Clancy: Cora, Dawson and Callan (CDC)

View: https://x.com/OwenBenjamin/status/2093387668948468206
 
Here is what is going to happen. The jury will not convict Clancy of murdering the children. She will go free. The woman who took the pictures of the jurors will plead no contest and will get 10 years in prison. This is the world we now live in.
 
My guess, this ends up as a hung jury in the next day or two. Dollars to donuts, there's a few AWFULs on the jury, that just won't convict her..

Then, this whole process starts again.... but I think, next time, trying to get an impartial jury will be REALLY tough, since the whole country seems to have an opinion...
Heard that there are 9 women and 3 men on the jury.
 
Given all the background, I don't think I could find her guilty of first-degree murder. I would probably have to insist on either "Guilty but Insane" (if that were an option) or, unhappily (if it was the only choice), go for "Not guilty by reason of insanity."

That's because there's a long history of her trying to get help with a known mental illness, and she seems to simply have been constantly put on this or that drug, after limited hospitalizations. The classic American medical system response to just drug someone into a zombie, rather than deal with the real issues. Which, in this case, was probably made even worse by the real, and as a few members have sadly experienced, hallucinations due to postpartum depression, possibly made worse by drugs. That's called psychosis, and it can be very, very real.

And yes, I know she snuffed out three precious lives; I'm not disputing that, but the medical records indicate this isn't the case that you see (which is probably more common), where an evil mother murders her children in cold blood, or abuses them for years until they die; and then claims, "But I'm mentally ill..."

Personally, I blame the "choices" provided either by the State or the Prosecution (I'm not sure how that works exactly) because "Guilty but Insane" would probably be correct. I'm sure one problem for other jurors would be that it looks like if they find her not responsible due to mental illness, there is no guarantee that she won't get out of the mental hospital. When in reality, she is obviously a danger to herself and others, and needs to be in a hospital for the criminally insane - at least for a decade or more.

That, I think, is the problem in a nutshell, at least looking at it from the outside, and again, I didn't sit in that courtroom, so this is simply based on what I'm reading.

Not having that verdict as an option will probably result in a hung jury. I hope there is a plea deal, or another trial won't bring those children back. It will cost the taxpayers a lot of money, and in the end, she's still likely to end up in a locked medical ward - either in a State/Federal Prison, which isn't really set up for her type of mental illness, or a mental hospital.
 
Unfortunately, in Massachusetts, there is NO "guilty but insane" choice...

Available Verdicts in Massachusetts

When an insanity defense (legally termed a "lack of criminal responsibility") is raised in a Massachusetts criminal trial, the jury's choices on the verdict slip are strictly:

Guilty (of the charged offense or a lesser-included offense like manslaughter)
Not Guilty
Not Guilty by Reason of Lack of Criminal Responsibility

How the Law Works

All-or-Nothing: The jury must decide if the defendant possessed the required criminal responsibility at the exact time of the act. If the defense raises reasonable doubt about their mental capacity under the state's standard, the verdict must be an acquittal based on lack of criminal responsibility.

No Compromise Verdict: Juries cannot split the difference with a "guilty but mentally ill" verdict that would result in a prison sentence combined with mandated psychiatric care.

I agree that "guilty but insane" would be the correct verdict, and I think a 40 year sentence (with mandatory lifetime parole if she is released after 40 years) would be appropriate.

Summerthyme
 

Rogan To Lindsey Clancy Fans: Look At The Crime Scene​

by Tyler Durden
Thursday, Sep 03, 2026 - 08:04 AM
Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity News,

Joe Rogan has had enough of the women lining up outside a Massachusetts courthouse in pink to cheer a mother who strangled her three children to death.



Sitting with comedian Brian Simpson, he refused to accept the "Free Lindsay" spectacle as a mental-health awareness campaign.

He treated it as a grotesque inversion of basic human instinct: hundreds of adults, overwhelmingly women, performing solidarity with a child murderer.


"If those ladies could see the crime scene and see those dead kids with their vacant eyes staring up because their mother took their life, the last thing that they saw was their mother standing over them, choking them to death, I don't think they would feel so bad," he said.

"People are out of their mind. People are showing up in support of a woman who killed her children. I don't care how rough it was. The ability to kill your children is crazy," Rogan further urged.

"Anyone who has kids knows how much you love them, what you would do to save them, what you do to protect them from harm," he added.


Rogan suggested to imagine if a single father had done the same thing. "He wouldn't get this same sympathy." And if Lindsay Clancy is found not criminally responsible and walks, "her supporters should have to let her babysit."

Simpson was cruder still. She went three-for-three on the strangulations, he said, then chose a sloppy method when it came time to kill herself. "Why not strangle yourself? You are definitely good at that."

That is the conversation the country is now having while a jury of nine women and three men sits in Plymouth, unable so far to agree whether Clancy was a murderer or a woman so far gone mentally that she cannot be held responsible.

Clancy does not deny the killings. The trial is about why. The defense, led by Kevin Reddington, says postpartum psychosis, command hallucinations, and a blizzard of medications left her unable to understand the wrongfulness of what she was doing. Prosecutors say she cleared the house on purpose, acted with precision, and later built a psychosis story around a planned crime.

That is the legal fight. Outside the building it became something else: a fandom.

Hundreds of supporters, almost all women, have gathered outside Plymouth Superior Court in pink. Shirts and signs read "She Needed Help," "Peace For Lindsay," and "Believe." Organizer Renee Kimball, who has no personal connection to the family, told reporters the point was to stand "in peace" for a woman she said any of them could have been.

"Any one of us who have dealt with mental health, anxiety, depression, postpartum - I think we just know that any one of us could be sitting in her chair," Kimball said.
April Vincent, a paralegal from Rhode Island, framed it as systemic neglect: "Women are being dismissed, neglected and ignored when we speak up."

That language has been the constant. Not "she killed three children." She needed help. The system failed her. I could have been her.





A USA Today columnist who had raised four children under six wrote that she was "perplexed." Millions of women endure exhaustion, pain, and the grind of early motherhood without wrapping exercise bands around a toddler's neck.

The online version of the fandom went further than the courthouse: "I could have been Lindsay Clancy," Substack essays, "Same, Lindsay" videos filmed with living children in frame, GoFundMe money flowing to the parents of the woman who killed their grandchildren.

Bill Maher, no one's idea of a MAGA culture warrior, looked at the same footage and asked the question the pink shirts refuse to.

"What I don't get is why does she have fans?" he said on his August 28 show.

"There are so many women now who are, like, outside the courthouse. It's a little like Luigi. I understand the frustration. Don't understand why the fans."
He compared the courthouse crowds to the women who treat Luigi Mangione as a folk hero. Frustration with systems is one thing. Building a fan club around a person who ended three young lives is another.

Then he widened the lens: not many women kill their children, "but a lot of them are not afraid to say, 'I don't like being a mom.'" The Clancy trial became a permission structure for a broader, fashionable disgust with the job of mothering itself.

Rogan and Simpson arrived at the same observation from the other direction. Society always finds a softer story when the defendant is a woman. A father who strangled three children would be a monster without question. There would be no silent pink line and no Etsy "Team Lindsay" shirts.

As of Wednesday, the jury was back for a fifth day of deliberations. On Tuesday they sent Judge William Sullivan a note: after many hours they could not reach a unanimous decision. He sent them back, citing the length of the trial, more than 80 witnesses, and more than 300 exhibits.

The panel of nine women and three men has now spent the better part of four days and more than 20 hours on a case that admits the acts and argues only about criminal responsibility.

Options include first-degree murder, a lesser homicide verdict, or a finding that she lacked criminal responsibility. An NCR finding would not automatically mean she goes home. A judge can still commit her to a psychiatric facility if she is found dangerous.

Defense attorney Reddington has called the prosecution "a mess." Prosecutors have argued this was not a woman in the throes of psychosis so complete she could not form intent: she got her husband out of the house, she completed the killings, she chose a method that worked on the children and then a method that failed on herself.

That last detail is what Simpson needled and what Rogan would not romanticize. Whatever was happening in her mind, three children are dead and a crowd showed up to make her the protagonist.

None of that requires a street festival for the person who carried out the killings.

The "I could have been her" line is the tell. It converts a specific, horrific crime into a generic female grievance. Once that conversion is made, the children become props in a story about neglected women. The father becomes a suspect in the comment section. The exercise bands become a footnote.

A society that cannot say, without a thousand caveats, that strangling your five-year-old, your three-year-old, and your baby is an evil act has lost the plot. The jury may yet hang. The women in pink already have.

 
Women weren’t allowed to serve on juries nationwide until 1975.

The Clancy trial proves we need to go back to that.
Good point... and what we see going on today.

Many women run their lives, TODAY, based on Feelings and Emotions.... screw Laws, Common Sense, and Logic.... It's their FEELINGS that matter!!!

And this trial proves that point.... CLEARLY...

Now, where's my Pink Shirt... I have a rally to go to.... :eye:
 
Unfortunately, in Massachusetts, there is NO "guilty but insane" choice...

Available Verdicts in Massachusetts

When an insanity defense (legally termed a "lack of criminal responsibility") is raised in a Massachusetts criminal trial, the jury's choices on the verdict slip are strictly:

Guilty (of the charged offense or a lesser-included offense like manslaughter)
Not Guilty
Not Guilty by Reason of Lack of Criminal Responsibility

How the Law Works

All-or-Nothing: The jury must decide if the defendant possessed the required criminal responsibility at the exact time of the act. If the defense raises reasonable doubt about their mental capacity under the state's standard, the verdict must be an acquittal based on lack of criminal responsibility.

No Compromise Verdict: Juries cannot split the difference with a "guilty but mentally ill" verdict that would result in a prison sentence combined with mandated psychiatric care.

I agree that "guilty but insane" would be the correct verdict, and I think a 40 year sentence (with mandatory lifetime parole if she is released after 40 years) would be appropriate.

Summerthyme
Thanks, I had a feeling that was the problem, and it is one that states have been dealing with for decades. It is sad that not all of them have sorted this out, because this isn't the first time something like this has happened, and sadly, it probably won't be the last.

I remember the woman who was extremely mentally ill; her husband refused to let her be treated, and she believed "God" had told her to send her babies to Jesus. That state had similar laws with no "guilty but insane," and the jury found her guilty of murder. Even the prosecutor realized there was now a publicity nightmare on his hands, because the woman was obviously profoundly mentally ill, and no prison wanted to take her either. I gather a deal was quietly made with the judge to send her to a mental institution with a locked ward.

Last I heard, and it was years ago (I talked it over with Nightwolf), every time doctors got her somewhat "stable" on her meds, she would realize what she had done and be so profoundly horrified that she would have a complete relapse. The article didn't say exactly what that meant, but I gather psychotic and unable to interact with her doctors and carers.
 
Let it be clear that I have zero sympathy with Lindsay. In my mind this was clearly premeditated. The only thing she got wrong was her method of suicide. Now we're stuck with her living in a state that doesn't allow the death penalty. The blood of those children calls from the grave for justice, and they will receive none.
 
Let it be clear that I have zero sympathy with Lindsay. In my mind this was clearly premeditated. The only thing she got wrong was her method of suicide. Now we're stuck with her living in a state that doesn't allow the death penalty. The blood of those children calls from the grave for justice, and they will receive none.
Not to go into religious thread drift but I believe those precious babies will receive justice, just not on this earth
 
Top