POL Kerry: McCain lacks judgment for presidency

Dornroeschen

Inactive
Kerry: McCain lacks judgment for presidency
Democrat had courted GOP nominee in 2004 as possible vice-president pick
The Associated Press
updated 7:46 p.m. CT, Sun., July. 6, 2008

WASHINGTON - John Kerry says Republican John McCain doesn't have the judgment to be president.

If that's the case, then it's probably a good thing McCain rejected overtures from Kerry, the Democratic presidential nominee in 2004, to form a bipartisan ticket and run with Kerry as his candidate for vice president.

Kerry had no kind words for his Senate colleague Sunday, accusing McCain of poor decision-making on everything from backing tax cuts for the wealthy to making support for continuing the U.S. military presence in Iraq the centerpiece of his presidential campaign.

"John McCain ... has proven that he has been wrong about every judgment he's made about the war. Wrong about the Iraqis paying for the reconstruction, wrong about whether or not the oil would pay for it, wrong about Sunni and Shia violence through the years, wrong about the willingness of the Iraqis to stand up for themselves," Kerry, who supports Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama, said on CBS' "Face the Nation."

"If you like the Bush tax cut and what it's done to our economy, making wealthier people wealthier and the average middle class struggle harder, then John McCain is going to give you a third term of George Bush and Karl Rove," the Massachusetts senator added, echoing an Obama campaign talking point.

Kerry later said the McCain of 2008 isn't the McCain he courted in 2004.

"John McCain has changed in profound and fundamental ways that I find personally really surprising, and frankly upsetting. It is not the John McCain as the senator who defined himself, quote, as a maverick, though questionable," Kerry said. "This is want-to-be president John McCain. The result is that John McCain has flip-flopped on more issues than I was even ever accused possibly of thinking about."

McCain adviser Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said McCain was the one who stood up to the administration and urged President Bush to send more U.S. troops to Iraq to help control violence. Obama did not support the addition of troops.

Violence in Iraq has dropped to its lowest level in more than four years as a result of the 2007 buildup of forces.

"We're winning because John McCain understood Iraq better than anybody else," Graham said. "The surge has worked. The political, economic and military progress in Iraq is undeniable."

Not too long ago, Kerry might have described McCain, a fellow Vietnam veteran and former prisoner of war, as a bipartisan ally who could provide guidance on national security issues.

McCain came to Kerry's aid in March 2004 after Bush and his campaign tried to paint the Democrat as weak on defense. He rejected the suggestion in broadcast interviews and chided both parties for waging such a "bitter and partisan" campaign.

The two senators also discussed the vice presidency several times before McCain finally rejected Kerry's overtures to form a bipartisan ticket. Kerry ultimately selected then-Sen. John Edwards, D-N.C., to join the ticket.

For the record, Kerry is not among those being mentioned as possible running mates for McCain.

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25558478/
 

denfoote

Inactive
Kerry, that cowardly Godless Communist!!!

Lurch needs to go back to Dr Frankenstein for dismantling.

John McCain has more good judgment in his little toe than Kerry has in his entire family and I think McCain's a RINO!!!
 

Topusaret

Deceased
Gawd! Please, can't we make a law that if you are the loser in a campaign for POTUS (or any other office, for that matter) you must keep your damn pie-hole shut forever or face waterboarding until you do.

You lost the damn election...WE didn't want you. WE preferred four more years of Bush over YOU. :stfu:already.
 

D_el

Veteran Member
I heartily endorse both of the above comments!

I'm D_el and I approve of this message.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
I think John Kerry would make a good POTUS. We'll save a fortune in "official dress." He's got a closet full of fatigues he saved from Vietnam (and paraded in front of Congress with) and I'll bet he still has them.

His wife says "Gee Johnny, I'm feeling kind of fatigued tonight. Can we play Commander in Chief instead?"

"Ok, as long as you don't play Hillary while I'm Bill."

Satirically,
Joe
 

Infoscout

The Dude Abides
The more idiots Obama parades in fornt of the camera, the better Ole John looks. keep them coming Obie, once the chaos of the democ convention starts, obama's run is over anyway.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
Hey! Watch who you're callin' a Republican.

Badnarick was my last candidate of choice. As it turned out, and as I suspected, he was the candidate of non-choice - I could have stayed home.

Maybe next time I will. Cokie Roberts on NPR says that the Republicans are in general taking the hint and "abandoning" Washington anyway. Like rats off a sinking ship retirements abound on the Republican side of Congress and a lot of those chairs are going uncontested. That says something about the party leadership and the health of the party in general.

Maybe it's time for the Dems to "have it there way" for a while. Too bad we don't all "get a break today" in the meanwhile.

McGovernment aphorisms aside, I kind of thought it was optimal when there was partisan bickering going on. Best situation was with a Republican executive branch and a Democratic Congress - or visa versa. While the arguments went on, the dot.gov was meanwhile hamstrung and nothing got "done." Meanwhile, you and I go on with our lives and DO something which is what most of these situations really required.

With the election still being planned, Cokie also indicates a possible "democratic backlash" that might aid McCain since many people have this basic fear of unbalanced, unrestrained government. Many of the McCain political ads are playing to this possibility. And the possibility of a Democratic backlash is one reason the Democratic Congress will not touch energy prices with a 10 foot pole until after the election (And it's almost as if they correctly sense they have no power in the matter anyway - but I wouldn't give them that much credit for intelligence.)

IMHO, the worst thing that can happen is when one party or the other gets total control of the process and attempts to "solve" problems. Remember Reagan and the Nine most feared words? Big talker he was with the largest to date federal deficits - at least until the Bush Administration.

Rant over. Go back to your sheeple lives. Nothing to see here.

Best,
Joe
 
Last edited:

Loon

Inactive
Well McCain lost my vote this morning. I lay in bed listening to the news and heard something he said. It went something like this. He thinks that big government should cut back on it's spending. He also said that they need to reel in the entitlement programs LIKE SOCIAL SECURITY.

Well, we're now retired and living on hubby's pension and social security. No way can we vote for somebody who wants to cut our income especially when the cost of living is skyrocketing.

So, we'll probably vote democratic this time round.

I also support ending the war in Iraq. We simply can't afford to be in it any more. THe democrats are for ending the war ASAP.
 
"...Kerry: McCain lacks judgment for presidency..."


And the 'other' presumed major party candidate DOES have the judgment for such???:rolleyes::kk2::kk2::rolleyes:

Not even maybe.

The candidates who have a great deal of judgement for POTUS are mostly no longer in the running.

RESET --- DO OVER needed.
 

Seeker

3 Bombs for Hawkins
For anyone currently on Social Security, I really don't think you have much to worry about. Even if SS is overhauled, its not going to be made retroactive. It will go broke before it will be reduced or "taken away" from you. Social Security was never designed to provide sole support for all the programs it has been explanded to cover. And government waste DOES need to be "reeled in." Government does not "give" anything - it "takes" from some in order to redistribute to others. The only three agencies I can think of that bring in money are IRS (your money), U.S. Customs from duties and seizures, and the judicial branches that levy fines and penalties. Help me out here - are there any other federal programs that support themselves?
 

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
Oh, but the gooberment DOES "give" things. Take Helicopter Ben's repeated "liquidity injecions" (emergency bailouts) of the large financial institutions over the past year. That money got "created out of thin air" and handed to those companies essentially for free. Yeah, I know that we're ont he hook for it in the end, but that money wasn't "taken;" it was "created."
 
Top