The Screamfest Continues
2023-12-16 07:00 by Karl Denninger
Back in late 2020 and early 2021 I warned explicitly about the jabby fest that was in the process of commencing into the maw of an active outbreak of infection. Specifically, I warned that if the jabs were non-sterilizing, that is, prophylaxis and not an actual vaccine, that they would both prolong the misery and, given the nature of coronaviruses generally to mutate very rapidly, make the situation much worse for those who took them.
This would even be true if the jabs worked "as advertised" -- that is, for the specific variants targeted, they prevented symptomatic infection.
Of course we now know they don't work "as advertised" and the trials were rigged to prevent that from being discovered -- specifically, we now know that their protection wears off in as little as three months and conveniently, guess how long the trials were? Uh huh - three months.
We in addition in December of 2020 knew the spike protein common to both the virus and the jabs in the circulation was specifically and singularly capable of causing systemic disorder -- that is, disease. No less than the Salk Institute published a paper on it. You had to be nuts to deliberately introduce that protein into your blood when we knew by then that Covid only went viremic -- that is, showed up in the blood -- in very severe and ultimately fatal cases.
If you knew of the Salk paper and still took the shots you're either mentally defective or suicidal. Only a nutcase would deliberately cause a known pathogen to circulate in their blood; what you did was exactly identical to letting someone known HIV+ butt**** you with no rubber or use a known HIV+ drug addict's used syringe, fully-aware that it is quite likely you will have the virus injected into your circulation.
Then, in early 2021, we began to see unexpected deaths.
And of course there was this, which was directly off the CDC's data and proved the shots didn't actually prevent hospitalization within just a few months among those most at-risk who got access to and took them early either:
We also knew there was a wildly accelerated risk of systemic inflammatory damage from the shots, specifically in the heart, by June of 2021 among younger people, in fact we saw TEN TIMES the expected rate, which was exactly what you'd expect might happen from the Salk paper of December 2020 -- yet we kept jabbing people anyway:
And worst of all, we knew that negative efficacy was real -- that is, the shots made it more-likely for you to get infected a few months down the road, and that effect was most-pronounced in those 40+ of age, which is hideously bad and implied it was in general because those older people got the jabs first thus that it appeared to "not be true" in younger people was probably simply a function of time since jabbing.
and
Yet still, even in September of 2021, when all this was known, we kept doing it and in fact tried to mandate it.
And if that wasn't bad enough by October we also had data that showed taking the jab made you a virus factory and destroyed your innate building of durable "N" protein immunity:
We weren't the only ones with this data, or to show it. Denmark did too:
The really nasty was yet to come, and here it is: We knew in early 2021, and in fact had evidence during the trials in 2020 that if you took these jabs yes, they suppressed symptoms. However, they were not sterilizing in any event, and the claim otherwise from Biden, CDC and myriad others -- "if you take these vaccines you will not get Covid" and "you are a dead end to the virus" were knowing, intentional lies.
We also knew more than 20 years earlier what happens with a low-prevalence disease (Pertussis) when you start using a non-sterilizing shot, as we did after the 1970s fiasco with crappy quality control in the original DTP formulation, which lead to the immunity given to vaccine manufacturers and a change in the formulation to be non-sterilizing for Pertussis: The reported case rate exploded by a factor of TWENTY over the next couple of decades.
Go look it up yourself; I have cited this before but if you don't remember do your own damned homework. Simply put the government, which I remind you was Reagan at the time, bending the knee resulted in not only legal immunity but an explosion in cases of what was a nearly-extinct disease in the United States.
The reason for this is not hard to figure out: Humans will avoid someone who is actively and obviously ill. This doesn't prevent transmission but it does attenuate it. However, if you suppress symptoms so someone is infected but doesn't outwardly look sick then nobody will avoid that person nor will they avoid being around others because everyone is unaware that they are potentially contagious. The result is much higher disease transmission and, in the case of a viral disease that mutates rapidly in hosts and cannot survive outside of a host this makes those who are jabbed but are not sterile to the virus into walking Typhoid Mary's that get repeatedly infected, generate mutations and spread them to others.
Coronaviruses are "odd birds" in that they have two protein segments -- the "N" and "S". The "S" part is what mutates and is, comparatively speaking, very large. It thus can mutate and remain "virally active" -- that is, being quite large the odds that it still "works" as a virus after a mutation is pretty good. This is the only part of the virus used in the jabs, a decision that was made because when both sections were used in previous trials over the decades it produced serious and even LETHAL enhancement down the road when challenged via natural mutated strains. To avoid this they used only the "S" protein.
The "N" protein, on the other hand, is conserved because it is quite small and, if it mutates, there is a very high risk that whatever it mutates to is non-viable and thus that's not a virus anymore. But the only way to get "N" protein recognition is to be infected since its not in the jabs, and worse, we knew in the early months of 2021, as I pointed out, that the jabs suppressed "N" protein recognition if you took them before getting infected which was conclusively shown by the summer months.
In other words if you took the jabs the odds were high that you would never gain "N" protein recognition and thus as soon as the virus mutated you could get infected again and again where for someone who did not take the jab and did have "N" protein recognition the odds were quite-high that they gained durable immunity that was not specific to the variation they were infected with.
This recognition was not and is not perfect, but it is both more-durable and wildly superior to that provided by the jabs -- which, again, are not vaccines and I refuse to call them that because by definition to be a vaccine the thing must induce sterile immunity.
We used to care about such things -- in fact, Sabin saved us from a hideous mistake that Salk made, in that his injected polio shot did not produce sterile immunity. You thus could get polio, you would not get sick, but you would shed the virus in your feces, which is how its transmitted, and could infect others as a consequence. If one of those others was not jabbed with Salk's IPV they would get actual polio and could get screwed, including being paralyzed or killed. Sabin's OPV formulation colonized the gut and prevented this because your body never produced enough virus to be infectious to others -- that is, sterile immunity. We used both in the United States until polio no longer circulated in the country and thus the odds of a person getting infected and causing someone else to get polio and die was vanishingly small. Today that is the case and thus we use IPV only but this is profoundly unsafe if you travel into parts of the world where that is not true -- not to you, but to the other people who are there.
Into 2023 we discovered IGg4 class-switching which, in those who kept going back to get "boosted" raises the possibility of profound and permanent immune impairment toward Covid -- and possibly other things. Never mind the recent revelation that the use of pseudo-uridine without long-term testing has raised the possibility, and some evidence of, severe autoimmune attack of unknown duration due to the creation of "frame-shifted" (that is, "off target" and unintentional) proteins by the jabs themselves.
Meanwhile both one and two years after I got infected with Delta I ran an IgG test on myself and found I still have antibodies. I have not been reinfected to the best of my knowledge since. A further test (the last one I happened to have laying around) several months later was also positive. We were told that if you got infected your protection would disappear within a few months despite data out of the Cleveland Clinic in 2020 and 2021 saying that this was not true. My experiment of "N = 1" shows that indeed it is not true -- for me at least, and in fact that was an expected result given the Cleveland Clinic data across their entire health care worker population set in the time before the jabs were available in that no confirmed re-infections occurred across their entire staff.
Never mind that it was documented during the Delta wave that vaccination was wildly inferior (by a factor of more than ten) to prior infection when it came to preventing disease.
There are still plenty of people, given all this, who are "scared" of multiple infections with the virus and many have had multiple rounds of it. Further claims are raised that such exponentially increases the risk of "persistent" symptoms (e.g. "Long Covid.")
The data supports that this is in fact likely "long vax", whether directly from the jabs or whether taking them caused you to be repeatedly infected where you otherwise would not have been and eventually you wind up with systemic and persistent damage due to persistent infections you cannot clear, a now-known risk due to IgG4 class-switching!
Why? Because the data also shows that being infected confers protection that is wildly superior to being jabbed. Therefore if I am forced to live with a virus circulating in the population (and I am) I choose not to take a shot that will make the situation worse, and all the jabs do exactly that.
Finally, there's the fact that this virus did not arise naturally. I pointed this out within weeks of it showing up in the sequencing databanks that are publicly accessible in that there are a pair of encodings that never appear in bats, pangolins or humans -- the alleged "natural path." This pair is also used in viral research for that very reason; if you run a virus you're working with that you've inserted that sequence into through, for example, a bacteria and the sequence comes out the other end you have proof that what you were doing "worked." Therefore, this virus was engineered.
For those who claim that repeated exposure is the "kiss of death" why hasn't each and every such person gone and killed everyone involved in creating this monster instead of expecting other people to take care of a problem you claim is a lethal risk to your and your progeny's continued existence? What sort of pussy are you? Are you one of those people who would let Hamas rape and murder your daughter rather than pick up a gun and put one right between said rapist's eyes? I'll answer that: You don't believe your own bullshit; you are mentally ill, screaming "look at me, I'm sooooo scared!" -- nothing more. Were I to be convinced that someone had created a monster that was going to kill me I would kill every single one of the people responsible I could since I'm dead, with certainty, and by God if someone does something THAT Satanic they're going first to the best of my human ability. I'll take my chances with judgment by St. Peter and my justification will be simple: I stopped them from being able to do it again. If St. Peter condemns me to Hell for that so be it; I willingly accept said judgment.
Am I supposed to care if you put yourself in this position by first, believing this is a virus different than all other airborne viruses that have naturally arisen over time (perhaps true) and then that the very people who designed and made it "happily" produced a shot and that was good, pure and the answer -- and now, having believed something which was that stupid you get screwed?
That depends.
If you were conned or coerced, then perhaps yes -- although there's nothing I can do about it, just like I can't do anything about you having cancer, taking chemo that wildly suppresses your immune system during the course of same, and thus wildly increases your risk of serious infection. If that happened that's sad, but there's nothing that can be done about it now; you made the decision and must bear the consequences, just like someone who drinks to excess over years or abuses drugs.
But what about if you were one of the people parading around with "vexxine strong!" banners in your social media, changed the lyrics of a song to "vexxine!", made public pronouncements that people should be fired or even imprisoned for refusing what turned out to be a stupid act or even went further and actually excluded those who refused from something you had control over and now you're getting screwed as a result of your own stupidity?
I cheer WHEN you get ****ed because you wanted to or even DID screw me, your intent was clear and your deliberate and willful arrogance blew up in your face and screwed you instead.
Stupid is supposed to hurt and thugs are not supposed to win. In fact Christianity tells those who believe in Christ that we are to fight Satan, not excuse or even enable acts that, objectively, certainly appear to be of service to the evil bastard in the Red Suit.
If you were one of the advocates you were and are a thug and no, I'm not going to "accommodate" you in any way after you wanted me to be literally held down and forced to take that which we now know was objectively STUPID and in fact it was known in December of 2020. Those who were "advocates" or "mandate pushers" had a legal and social duty to know these facts and if you're one of them and willfully and deliberately didn't do the work or worse, knew and advocated this crap anyway you deserve to burn in Hell.
Now about the people who have repeatedly lied, including both the previous and current President, both the current and previous CDC heads, Fauci, Birx (who has admitted she knowingly lied about efficacy), state Public Health officials, various "health" related institutions such as Vanderbilt, Johns Hopkins and others, politicians of all stripes and more: When are they going to be forced to pay, in both funds and treasure, for this crap that they imposed on everyone else through either deliberate falsehood or knowing and willful blindness in the face of overwhelming data? When are YOU going to force them to pay for what they did to you?
Yeah, that's what I thought.
PS: Jabbed or not there is basically zero risk in making damn sure you're not Vitamin D deficient. Be sane about the amount you consume as a supplement since being fat-soluble you can poison yourself with it if you are an idiot, and do use K2 as well (especially if you're female, as osteoporosis really is a thing and you really do want calcium to go and remain where it should in your body) but at worst making sure you're not deficient costs pennies and does nothing. The evidence is that Vitamin D deficiency, which is extremely common, is strongly associated with bad viral infection outcomes so for pennies in cost and effectively zero risk why would you not slam that door? I'm coming up on 2-1/2 years of doing exactly that now and the funny thing is that I've not so much as had a cold since making that change. Yeah, N = 1 and all that, but at zero risk and a cost of pennies why would you not?
www.market-ticker.org
2023-12-16 07:00 by Karl Denninger
Back in late 2020 and early 2021 I warned explicitly about the jabby fest that was in the process of commencing into the maw of an active outbreak of infection. Specifically, I warned that if the jabs were non-sterilizing, that is, prophylaxis and not an actual vaccine, that they would both prolong the misery and, given the nature of coronaviruses generally to mutate very rapidly, make the situation much worse for those who took them.
This would even be true if the jabs worked "as advertised" -- that is, for the specific variants targeted, they prevented symptomatic infection.
Of course we now know they don't work "as advertised" and the trials were rigged to prevent that from being discovered -- specifically, we now know that their protection wears off in as little as three months and conveniently, guess how long the trials were? Uh huh - three months.
We in addition in December of 2020 knew the spike protein common to both the virus and the jabs in the circulation was specifically and singularly capable of causing systemic disorder -- that is, disease. No less than the Salk Institute published a paper on it. You had to be nuts to deliberately introduce that protein into your blood when we knew by then that Covid only went viremic -- that is, showed up in the blood -- in very severe and ultimately fatal cases.
If you knew of the Salk paper and still took the shots you're either mentally defective or suicidal. Only a nutcase would deliberately cause a known pathogen to circulate in their blood; what you did was exactly identical to letting someone known HIV+ butt**** you with no rubber or use a known HIV+ drug addict's used syringe, fully-aware that it is quite likely you will have the virus injected into your circulation.
Then, in early 2021, we began to see unexpected deaths.
And of course there was this, which was directly off the CDC's data and proved the shots didn't actually prevent hospitalization within just a few months among those most at-risk who got access to and took them early either:
We also knew there was a wildly accelerated risk of systemic inflammatory damage from the shots, specifically in the heart, by June of 2021 among younger people, in fact we saw TEN TIMES the expected rate, which was exactly what you'd expect might happen from the Salk paper of December 2020 -- yet we kept jabbing people anyway:
And worst of all, we knew that negative efficacy was real -- that is, the shots made it more-likely for you to get infected a few months down the road, and that effect was most-pronounced in those 40+ of age, which is hideously bad and implied it was in general because those older people got the jabs first thus that it appeared to "not be true" in younger people was probably simply a function of time since jabbing.
and
Yet still, even in September of 2021, when all this was known, we kept doing it and in fact tried to mandate it.
And if that wasn't bad enough by October we also had data that showed taking the jab made you a virus factory and destroyed your innate building of durable "N" protein immunity:
We weren't the only ones with this data, or to show it. Denmark did too:
The really nasty was yet to come, and here it is: We knew in early 2021, and in fact had evidence during the trials in 2020 that if you took these jabs yes, they suppressed symptoms. However, they were not sterilizing in any event, and the claim otherwise from Biden, CDC and myriad others -- "if you take these vaccines you will not get Covid" and "you are a dead end to the virus" were knowing, intentional lies.
We also knew more than 20 years earlier what happens with a low-prevalence disease (Pertussis) when you start using a non-sterilizing shot, as we did after the 1970s fiasco with crappy quality control in the original DTP formulation, which lead to the immunity given to vaccine manufacturers and a change in the formulation to be non-sterilizing for Pertussis: The reported case rate exploded by a factor of TWENTY over the next couple of decades.
Go look it up yourself; I have cited this before but if you don't remember do your own damned homework. Simply put the government, which I remind you was Reagan at the time, bending the knee resulted in not only legal immunity but an explosion in cases of what was a nearly-extinct disease in the United States.
The reason for this is not hard to figure out: Humans will avoid someone who is actively and obviously ill. This doesn't prevent transmission but it does attenuate it. However, if you suppress symptoms so someone is infected but doesn't outwardly look sick then nobody will avoid that person nor will they avoid being around others because everyone is unaware that they are potentially contagious. The result is much higher disease transmission and, in the case of a viral disease that mutates rapidly in hosts and cannot survive outside of a host this makes those who are jabbed but are not sterile to the virus into walking Typhoid Mary's that get repeatedly infected, generate mutations and spread them to others.
Coronaviruses are "odd birds" in that they have two protein segments -- the "N" and "S". The "S" part is what mutates and is, comparatively speaking, very large. It thus can mutate and remain "virally active" -- that is, being quite large the odds that it still "works" as a virus after a mutation is pretty good. This is the only part of the virus used in the jabs, a decision that was made because when both sections were used in previous trials over the decades it produced serious and even LETHAL enhancement down the road when challenged via natural mutated strains. To avoid this they used only the "S" protein.
The "N" protein, on the other hand, is conserved because it is quite small and, if it mutates, there is a very high risk that whatever it mutates to is non-viable and thus that's not a virus anymore. But the only way to get "N" protein recognition is to be infected since its not in the jabs, and worse, we knew in the early months of 2021, as I pointed out, that the jabs suppressed "N" protein recognition if you took them before getting infected which was conclusively shown by the summer months.
In other words if you took the jabs the odds were high that you would never gain "N" protein recognition and thus as soon as the virus mutated you could get infected again and again where for someone who did not take the jab and did have "N" protein recognition the odds were quite-high that they gained durable immunity that was not specific to the variation they were infected with.
This recognition was not and is not perfect, but it is both more-durable and wildly superior to that provided by the jabs -- which, again, are not vaccines and I refuse to call them that because by definition to be a vaccine the thing must induce sterile immunity.
We used to care about such things -- in fact, Sabin saved us from a hideous mistake that Salk made, in that his injected polio shot did not produce sterile immunity. You thus could get polio, you would not get sick, but you would shed the virus in your feces, which is how its transmitted, and could infect others as a consequence. If one of those others was not jabbed with Salk's IPV they would get actual polio and could get screwed, including being paralyzed or killed. Sabin's OPV formulation colonized the gut and prevented this because your body never produced enough virus to be infectious to others -- that is, sterile immunity. We used both in the United States until polio no longer circulated in the country and thus the odds of a person getting infected and causing someone else to get polio and die was vanishingly small. Today that is the case and thus we use IPV only but this is profoundly unsafe if you travel into parts of the world where that is not true -- not to you, but to the other people who are there.
Into 2023 we discovered IGg4 class-switching which, in those who kept going back to get "boosted" raises the possibility of profound and permanent immune impairment toward Covid -- and possibly other things. Never mind the recent revelation that the use of pseudo-uridine without long-term testing has raised the possibility, and some evidence of, severe autoimmune attack of unknown duration due to the creation of "frame-shifted" (that is, "off target" and unintentional) proteins by the jabs themselves.
Meanwhile both one and two years after I got infected with Delta I ran an IgG test on myself and found I still have antibodies. I have not been reinfected to the best of my knowledge since. A further test (the last one I happened to have laying around) several months later was also positive. We were told that if you got infected your protection would disappear within a few months despite data out of the Cleveland Clinic in 2020 and 2021 saying that this was not true. My experiment of "N = 1" shows that indeed it is not true -- for me at least, and in fact that was an expected result given the Cleveland Clinic data across their entire health care worker population set in the time before the jabs were available in that no confirmed re-infections occurred across their entire staff.
Never mind that it was documented during the Delta wave that vaccination was wildly inferior (by a factor of more than ten) to prior infection when it came to preventing disease.
There are still plenty of people, given all this, who are "scared" of multiple infections with the virus and many have had multiple rounds of it. Further claims are raised that such exponentially increases the risk of "persistent" symptoms (e.g. "Long Covid.")
The data supports that this is in fact likely "long vax", whether directly from the jabs or whether taking them caused you to be repeatedly infected where you otherwise would not have been and eventually you wind up with systemic and persistent damage due to persistent infections you cannot clear, a now-known risk due to IgG4 class-switching!
Why? Because the data also shows that being infected confers protection that is wildly superior to being jabbed. Therefore if I am forced to live with a virus circulating in the population (and I am) I choose not to take a shot that will make the situation worse, and all the jabs do exactly that.
Finally, there's the fact that this virus did not arise naturally. I pointed this out within weeks of it showing up in the sequencing databanks that are publicly accessible in that there are a pair of encodings that never appear in bats, pangolins or humans -- the alleged "natural path." This pair is also used in viral research for that very reason; if you run a virus you're working with that you've inserted that sequence into through, for example, a bacteria and the sequence comes out the other end you have proof that what you were doing "worked." Therefore, this virus was engineered.
For those who claim that repeated exposure is the "kiss of death" why hasn't each and every such person gone and killed everyone involved in creating this monster instead of expecting other people to take care of a problem you claim is a lethal risk to your and your progeny's continued existence? What sort of pussy are you? Are you one of those people who would let Hamas rape and murder your daughter rather than pick up a gun and put one right between said rapist's eyes? I'll answer that: You don't believe your own bullshit; you are mentally ill, screaming "look at me, I'm sooooo scared!" -- nothing more. Were I to be convinced that someone had created a monster that was going to kill me I would kill every single one of the people responsible I could since I'm dead, with certainty, and by God if someone does something THAT Satanic they're going first to the best of my human ability. I'll take my chances with judgment by St. Peter and my justification will be simple: I stopped them from being able to do it again. If St. Peter condemns me to Hell for that so be it; I willingly accept said judgment.
Am I supposed to care if you put yourself in this position by first, believing this is a virus different than all other airborne viruses that have naturally arisen over time (perhaps true) and then that the very people who designed and made it "happily" produced a shot and that was good, pure and the answer -- and now, having believed something which was that stupid you get screwed?
That depends.
If you were conned or coerced, then perhaps yes -- although there's nothing I can do about it, just like I can't do anything about you having cancer, taking chemo that wildly suppresses your immune system during the course of same, and thus wildly increases your risk of serious infection. If that happened that's sad, but there's nothing that can be done about it now; you made the decision and must bear the consequences, just like someone who drinks to excess over years or abuses drugs.
But what about if you were one of the people parading around with "vexxine strong!" banners in your social media, changed the lyrics of a song to "vexxine!", made public pronouncements that people should be fired or even imprisoned for refusing what turned out to be a stupid act or even went further and actually excluded those who refused from something you had control over and now you're getting screwed as a result of your own stupidity?
I cheer WHEN you get ****ed because you wanted to or even DID screw me, your intent was clear and your deliberate and willful arrogance blew up in your face and screwed you instead.
Stupid is supposed to hurt and thugs are not supposed to win. In fact Christianity tells those who believe in Christ that we are to fight Satan, not excuse or even enable acts that, objectively, certainly appear to be of service to the evil bastard in the Red Suit.
If you were one of the advocates you were and are a thug and no, I'm not going to "accommodate" you in any way after you wanted me to be literally held down and forced to take that which we now know was objectively STUPID and in fact it was known in December of 2020. Those who were "advocates" or "mandate pushers" had a legal and social duty to know these facts and if you're one of them and willfully and deliberately didn't do the work or worse, knew and advocated this crap anyway you deserve to burn in Hell.
Now about the people who have repeatedly lied, including both the previous and current President, both the current and previous CDC heads, Fauci, Birx (who has admitted she knowingly lied about efficacy), state Public Health officials, various "health" related institutions such as Vanderbilt, Johns Hopkins and others, politicians of all stripes and more: When are they going to be forced to pay, in both funds and treasure, for this crap that they imposed on everyone else through either deliberate falsehood or knowing and willful blindness in the face of overwhelming data? When are YOU going to force them to pay for what they did to you?
Yeah, that's what I thought.
PS: Jabbed or not there is basically zero risk in making damn sure you're not Vitamin D deficient. Be sane about the amount you consume as a supplement since being fat-soluble you can poison yourself with it if you are an idiot, and do use K2 as well (especially if you're female, as osteoporosis really is a thing and you really do want calcium to go and remain where it should in your body) but at worst making sure you're not deficient costs pennies and does nothing. The evidence is that Vitamin D deficiency, which is extremely common, is strongly associated with bad viral infection outcomes so for pennies in cost and effectively zero risk why would you not slam that door? I'm coming up on 2-1/2 years of doing exactly that now and the funny thing is that I've not so much as had a cold since making that change. Yeah, N = 1 and all that, but at zero risk and a cost of pennies why would you not?
The Market Ticker Error: Post Not Available
Attachments
Last edited:
