Location, location, location.
I don't know yours (location, that is), but in the metro Atlanta area, the only things I could find for under $200K doing a quick internet search just now are very OLD homes in BAD neighborhoods, or one HALF of a duplex-building such as the below: (only the RIGHT-hand portion of the building below is the one for sale--for $180,000).
View attachment 612185
Again, to ASSume because "well it's this way in MY area" that "it MUST be available in ALL areas" is foolishness.
While the "location" as in a state, it is not so much true, in an area.
Those 5 homes like I said are in 5 miles of me, and they are spread out in different directions on the compass, they are ALL country. But they do have running water, and a septic tank. (indoor plumbing).
But are not the only houses like that. A little town pop around 30,000 in the rough, got hit with a tornado, in the residential section a few years ago. Houses, trees etc, all tore up in that part of town. I thank the Lord that no one was even hurt, it was unbelievable that, that happened.
Some of the houses they finished tearing down and rebuilt. Some size 1000-1500 sq ft. Some they just fixed, same. Still empty. Roughly same prices. But not 4,000 sq ft or 400,000.00.
And this town is roughly 40 miles from Tupelo, BUT people want to live there because the school system is out of sight good, and the HS is the focus of the town. The drive is not a big deal.
So whether in town, or in the country (location) the situation is the same. For this state.
Now in GA it may be different, but did you check outside of Atlanta? What the homes were going for in the country? Granted the drive time will be bigger, but driving in Atlanta is a bugger anyway. BTDT.
I personally wouldn't live in town, any town, and forget big city. And if I had to do it over again I would change things up a bit.
My dad bought an acre on a state HWY gave 500.00 for it, and built a house on it. 1100 sq ft. 1970. When the house was finished he told me: Back during the depression, when he would stomp through that area, going hunting, that same land was for sale, without the state hwy running through it. Cost per acre 2.00. He didn't have 2.00. When he gave 500.00 for it, it was the last year he worked and was the first time he broke through 10,000.00 a year.
When I wanted to buy a house after marriage in 1977, an acre was 1500.00. I couldn't afford it.
But now, my priority would be to rent a dingy one room apt. and save, save, save, to buy land. Then build the house myself, when I had the money to pay cash for it. Have seen several folks around here do that. Took them a couple of years to finish, but when done, the house was paid for.
My grandfather didn't blame his dad who was born before the Civil War by 13 years, for only being a sharecropper and renting a log cabin, until his children built them a house on his son's 70 acres. My dad didn't blame his dad for not having 2.00. I didn't blame my dad for not having 1500.00.
The point of the article is to excuse Gen X or whoever, and blaming someone else for their problems/ for the situation they are in.
When for hundreds of years generations have been in even worse situations in the economy, and didn't blame anyone else, just tried to cope with what they had. And make the best of it.