CUCK Jana Riess: LDS leader Dallin Oaks blasts right-wing extremists, but will they know he’s talking to them?

TKO

Veteran Member
So, Oaks gives Trumpers the finger. Now, I've known Oaks since I was a kid. I used to think he was a solid dude. He was the Stake President in my stake, in Chicago. Like most LDS leaders, he's gone off the deep end and supports parties that would grind up the Constitution he talks about because they will allow open borders. Oaks said this in Conference...

Independent actions will sometimes require voters to support candidates or political parties or platforms whose other positions they cannot approve.
I'll fix this by providing the true meaning..."It's OK to support Satan if he gives you a goody here and there."

Here's the best part of the article..."Listening between the lines, I would not be surprised if Oaks himself voted for Joe Biden despite the church leader’s well-attested opposition to abortion. "

Church apostle sounds the alarm about recent actions of some Trump supporters, but the General Conference talk did not let liberals off the hook, either.
(Photo courtesy of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints) President Dallin H. Oaks, first counselor in the governing First Presidency, speaks at General Conference about the U.S. Constitution on Easter Sunday, April 4, 2021.

(Photo courtesy of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints) President Dallin H. Oaks, first counselor in the governing First Presidency, speaks at General Conference about the U.S. Constitution on Easter Sunday, April 4, 2021.
By Jana Riess | Religion News Service
| April 5, 2021, 5:15 p.m.
Extreme right-wing Donald Trump supporters got a serious dressing-down at this weekend’s General Conference of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, even if the speaker — President Dallin Oaks, the next in line to be the faith’s prophet — did not specifically name them or the candidate they supported.
Oaks’ talk was jarring, perhaps not so much in its content as in its context. From the very beginning, it had a “one of these things is not like the others” sensibility about it. For starters, it was a boldly political speech that occurred on Easter Sunday, when other speakers emphasized the risen Christ. As well, it was a specifically American-focused message that followed a beautiful morning session showcasing the international character of the 21st-century church through global choirs singing in their own languages (that adorable children’s choir from Korea!) and speakers joining virtually from multiple continents.
Latter-day Saint social media has been buzzing about whether Oaks was sounding the alarm about recent actions of Trump supporters in the United States. I think there’s no question he was, though as you can see from my analysis of the quotes below, I don’t think liberals are completely off the hook either.
Oaks • “Sovereign power of the people does not mean that mobs and other groups of people can intervene to intimidate or force government action … The people exercise their power through their elected representatives.”
This was for right-wing Latter-day Saints. Oaks was referring to the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, in which Trump supporters sought to disrupt the legitimate functioning of government through violence.

It’s in keeping with the apostle’s October 2020 conference talk, in which he appeared to be responding to Donald Trump’s preelection statements that he would not accept election results as legitimate unless he won. Latter-day Saints, Oaks clarified, “peacefully accept the results of elections. We will not participate in the violence threatened by those disappointed with the outcome.”
Unfortunately, some Latter-day Saints did indeed participate in the ridiculous farce that was the “stop the steal” movement among disappointed Trump voters, and a few even took part in the Jan. 6 insurrection.
Oaks • “We are to be governed by law and not by individuals, and our loyalty is to the Constitution and its principles and processes, not to any officeholder … These principles block the autocratic ambitions that have corrupted democracy in some countries.”
This was also for right-wing members. The context for this is Trump tried to overturn a legitimate and peaceful election, which is the bedrock of good government. Because Trump seemed to view government primarily as a tool for furthering his own ambitions, he considered it a personal betrayal when his vice president and attorney general would not overturn the Constitution and two centuries of political precedent just to keep him in office.
To someone like Oaks, this kind of behavior is exceptionally dangerous. Democracies are more fragile than we think. To survive, they need to be greater than one leader’s desire for power.

Oaks • “Despite the divinely inspired principles of the U.S. Constitution, when exercised by imperfect mortals, their intended effects have not always been achieved. Important subjects of lawmaking, such as some laws governing family relationships, have been taken from the states by the federal government.”

This was for liberal and moderate Latter-day Saints. Oaks here was reminding listeners of his view that individual states should never be forced to allow same-sex marriage if that is not the will of the people in those states. Again, though, he didn’t single out any one group by name.
Oaks • “Being subject to presidents or rulers, of course, poses no obstacle to our opposing individual laws or policies. It does require that we exercise our influence civilly and peacefully … On contested issues, we should seek to moderate and unify.”
This was for everyone. As I listened to the talk a second time on YouTube, I was struck by the irony of the divisive and angry comments of viewers below, screaming past one other about politics. (See also the church’s Facebook page!) Oaks suggests that, while we can have strong views about politics, we cross a line when we claim church members who voted differently are somehow deficient in faith. (Yes, I know I have done this, too. I’m trying.)
Oaks • “There are many political issues, and no party, platform or individual candidate can satisfy all personal preferences. Each citizen must therefore decide which issues are most important to him or her at any particular time … This process will not be easy. It may require changing party support or candidate choices, even from election to election.”

This was for everyone. There has not been a more politically polarized time in modern U.S. history, and that divisiveness is dangerous.
Let’s take a moment to assess where we are. Since the 1950s, the Gallup organization has tracked public approval ratings of U.S. presidents by party. Back in the 1950s, a majority of Americans could legitimately say “I like Ike” and mean it: Not only did 88% of the members of his own party approve of him, but 49% of Democrats did, too. What we see now, by contrast, is a country split right down party lines: On the eve of the 2020 presidential election, a stunning 95% of Republicans said they approved of the way Donald Trump was running the country. Only 3% of Democrats could say the same.
Folks, that’s the stuff civil wars are made of. One remedy is to bring back split-ticket voting — remember when we used to do that? — in which people actually have to use their brains and vote candidate by candidate, issue by issue. That’s what Oaks is advocating here, and I wholeheartedly agree. Blind loyalty to any political party can reap frightening consequences.
Oaks • “Independent actions will sometimes require voters to support candidates or political parties or platforms whose other positions they cannot approve.”
This was primarily for right-wing Latter-day Saints again. What I hear him saying is, “Right-wingers, sometimes you may need to vote for a pro-choice candidate in order to avoid a greater evil.” Listening between the lines, I would not be surprised if Oaks himself voted for Joe Biden despite the church leader’s well-attested opposition to abortion.

Oaks • “We should never assert that a faithful Latter-day Saint cannot belong to a particular party or vote for a particular candidate.”
This was also primarily for the right wing. This was the money quote, which the church immediately tweeted from its official account almost as soon as the words were out of Oaks’ mouth. There have been far too many instances in the modern church in which members who are Democrats, who are only a third of our U.S. membership, have been challenged or mocked by the conservative majority. (Is apostle Dieter Uchtdorf’s family unfaithful for generously supporting Biden’s campaign? No? Then stop judging the family’s worthiness.)
Somehow I have a feeling when this conference’s talks are parsed out for Relief Society and priesthood lessons over the next six months, this one will not be in the rotation in most stakes. As Oaks said, church meetings are not the place to talk about politics. But the talk was historic nonetheless.
By Jana Riess | Religion News Service
 

sssarawolf

Has No Life - Lives on TB
No they aren't going woke, and neither I nor my hubby got that out of his talk. There are extremes, as in everything. No way did I get he was after conservative type people like us. I guess folks really do hear different things from the same source. But I know we all have out own opinion. So lets agree to disagree.
 

TKO

Veteran Member
No they aren't going woke, and neither I nor my hubby got that out of his talk. There are extremes, as in everything. No way did I get he was after conservative type people like us. I guess folks really do hear different things from the same source. But I know we all have out own opinion. So lets agree to disagree.
Time will tell. One thing I noted is Oaks forgot how our country started..."Sovereign power of the people does not mean that mobs and other groups of people can intervene to intimidate or force government action". He thinks the elections are on the up and up because “The people exercise their power through their elected representatives.”
 

Squid

Veteran Member
No they aren't going woke, and neither I nor my hubby got that out of his talk. There are extremes, as in everything. No way did I get he was after conservative type people like us. I guess folks really do hear different things from the same source. But I know we all have out own opinion. So lets agree to disagree.
I assume his chastising Democrats support of the violence and killing in the name of social justice is between the lines???? Many that were carried out with the expressed intention of shaping the election!

If he calls out one side for One Incident and ignore the Many much more violent and more numerous incidents from the the other, he is, by his silence condoning evil. If he wishes to preach it would be helpful if he was at least consistent.

I can accept conistently applied preaching from the pulpits but politics is not from the one above but seeking to aid the one below.

And ignorance is no defense.
 

TKO

Veteran Member
I watched him speak live. I didn’t get that at all. I thought he was talking about lefties, antifa and blm. My ears weren’t burning at all
The article pointed out that "Oaks was referring to the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, in which Trump supporters sought to disrupt the legitimate functioning of government through violence. "
 

desert_fox

Threadkiller
I don't agree with the OP on this one at all. Nitpickers will pick and armchair quarterbacks will scream, "but what about this!". I did not see or hear any of the issues that the article is addressing, rather the opposite.
 

rbt

Veteran Member
I think you can intrepid something any way you want, but I take this as a lesson on the constitution. If we stray from the original meaning our freedom is in big trouble. Personally I hope the American people wake up before it’s to late. Every American has already lost much and our grandchildren may never know what we lost.
 

Laurane

Canadian Loonie
"Independent actions will sometimes require voters to support candidates or political parties or platforms whose other positions they cannot approve."

You are assuming that LDS voters are all Republicans - he just might have been talking to those blue dog Democrats who supported Dems since the 1940s but would be classified as moderate Republicans now. And they may have still voted for Biden because they didn't like Pres Trump's personality or out of habit, or they actually believed the media.

Could he have been saying to Dems "overlook personal traits, and things which appear to be too right wing extreme to you" and vote for the Constitution, and not the Party? This was the message I got from his talk and not the opposite which you did.

Pres Oaks is a strict Constitutionalist...... again we disagree, as I hear this .....

“Sovereign power of the people does not mean that mobs and other groups of people can intervene to intimidate or force government action … The people exercise their power through their elected representatives.”

as "don't get involved with groups like BLM and get swept away with intolerance and violence" or any extreme group.
 

Laurane

Canadian Loonie
Also, one of my pet peeves is his reference to “democracy”, which we are NOT.

Jeff B.
There is a difference between "A Democracy" which you are not, and "democracy" which is a form of working with other people in a .gov. So you are a democratic Republic if you are working within a federal .gov to continue those principles.

Just semantics, and I hate the term Democratic Party, which it is not!
 

MinnesotaSmith

Membership Revoked
This sounds pretty "woke" to me.


ymf_logo_header_standard4.png


brigham young university should consider changing their name
By youngmormonfeministguest, January 10, 2021

byu-racist.jpg


"Brigham Young is the second president of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (LDS) who led Mormons to Salt Lake City, making the city the Mormon hub that it is today. Young opened an academy, which later became known as Brigham Young University (established in 1875), which still bears his name today. Brigham Young University (BYU) is affiliated with the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints from the beginning, as Young wanted a religious institution that could offer a “…good education unmixed with the pernicious atheistic influences that are found in so many of the higher schools of the country” (Bills 2003).

While the aim to open a Mormon- centered school is admirable, it’s clear that through research of Young’s teachings that Young has proven himself to be a problematic person who held deeply racist views, views that he brought into politics and into the teachings of the of the LDS church. For these reasons, I believe that it is time to consider a new name for this LDS institution, a name that would better reflect the current beliefs and values of the church."
 
Last edited:

TKO

Veteran Member
This sounds pretty "woke" to me.


ymf_logo_header_standard4.png


brigham young university should consider changing their name
By youngmormonfeministguest, January 10, 2021

byu-racist.jpg


"Brigham Young is the second president of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (LDS) who led Mormons to Salt Lake City, making the city the Mormon hub that it is today. Young opened an academy, which later became known as Brigham Young University (established in 1875), which still bears his name today. Brigham Young University (BYU) is affiliated with the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints from the beginning, as Young wanted a religious institution that could offer a “…good education unmixed with the pernicious atheistic influences that are found in so many of the higher schools of the country” (Bills 2003).

While the aim to open a Mormon- centered school is admirable, it’s clear that through research of Young’s teachings that Young has proven himself to be a problematic person who held deeply racist views, views that he brought into politics and into the teachings of the of the LDS church. For these reasons, I believe that it is time to consider a new name for this LDS institution, a name that would better reflect the current beliefs and values of the church."
I suspect they'll rename BYU to either Joseph Freeman University or Gladys Knight University. They won't keep the BYU name.
 

Daytonabill0001

Wheat or Tare, which are you?
The article pointed out that "Oaks was referring to the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, in which Trump supporters sought to disrupt the legitimate functioning of government through violence. "
And that makes it a "hit" piece.

The Jan 6 insurrection was performed by sleight of hand BLM and Antifa actors working together to generate the narrative that it was Trump supporters under the urging of Trump to commit the acts that occurred that day.

It was by an act of God that the fake Trump supporters were already wrecking the Capitol ten or fifteen minutes before the first of the Trump crowd arrived...
 

TKO

Veteran Member
"Independent actions will sometimes require voters to support candidates or political parties or platforms whose other positions they cannot approve."

You are assuming that LDS voters are all Republicans - he just might have been talking to those blue dog Democrats who supported Dems since the 1940s but would be classified as moderate Republicans now. And they may have still voted for Biden because they didn't like Pres Trump's personality or out of habit, or they actually believed the media.

Could he have been saying to Dems "overlook personal traits, and things which appear to be too right wing extreme to you" and vote for the Constitution, and not the Party? This was the message I got from his talk and not the opposite which you did.

Pres Oaks is a strict Constitutionalist...... again we disagree, as I hear this .....

“Sovereign power of the people does not mean that mobs and other groups of people can intervene to intimidate or force government action … The people exercise their power through their elected representatives.”

as "don't get involved with groups like BLM and get swept away with intolerance and violence" or any extreme group.
I highly doubt it. He isn't talking to blue dogs. What? There are maybe 12 blue dogs now? They vote with the mainstream Dems. Oaks has always been a Romneyesque character. He calls himself a moderate. Oaks always talks Constitution. He fails to remember that the Dems want to throw the Constitution in the trash can. If they are going to swing at politics they better figure out which side is which.

It's the article's opinion. Did you read the article? The paper is owned by Paul Huntsman...LDS.

Here's another tidbit. LDS Church President's Counselor donated to Biden. I think we see where the LDS leadership are heading.
Despite LDS Church rules against top leaders contributing to political candidates, federal election reports indicate that popular Latter-day Saint apostle Dieter Uchtdorf made 13 donations last year and early in 2021, totaling nearly $2,300, to Democratic Party funds and candidates, including Joe Biden’s presidential campaign.

Once it was uncovered, Uchtdorf had to start talking fast. "It wasn't me." LOL!
“These donations were made by our family using an online account, which is shared by our family and associated with my name. I regret such an oversight on my part. I fully support the church’s policy related to political donations from church leaders.”
 
Last edited:

TKO

Veteran Member
The church doesn’t support any political candidate.
But Uchtdorf contributed to Biden's campaign. No donations to Trump's campaign. LOL!

I noted Uchtdorf contributed to GA candidates, too..

Uchtdorf gave three donations — for $170, $125 and $83.33 — to the campaign of Raphael Warnock, pastor of the historic Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta. One of the contributions was received the day before the runoff vote.

He also gave two contributions — for $125 and $83.34 — to the campaign of Jon Ossoff, seeking to become the Peach State’s first Jewish senator. Again, the last donation was received the day before the special election.
 
Last edited:

fish hook

Deceased
While there is a rising liberal faction of the church, as the rest of the country, i think they are at this time a minority. They are however a growing force. I see President Oaks talk as an attempt to build unity within the church and the nation and not an attack on conservatives. Most of the time someone who sets out to be a peacemaker and tries to please every one pleases no one.
 

TKO

Veteran Member
That’s as a private citizen, not representing the church.
I'd disagree with that comment based off the calling. They are supposed to be 24/7 "Apostles". Once called into that job...it's not an "I go to work and then have a private life when I get home." They are called to that job until dead or given emeritus status. So, whatever they do is indicative of the actions they'll take as board members within the church and leaders within the church. They may feign impartiality...but it's obvious that their private actions extend beyond that. They are supposed to do nothing that discredits the church. Giving to Biden and his pro-abortion/pro-sodomite minion discredits the church. "Do as I say...not as I do." It's like an apostle with a porn addiction. What they do isn't representing the church. Is that good? No. However, looking at porn may be something a private citizen does.

(It used to be that an LDS who owned a liquor distributor couldn't get a temple recommend...until one in Vegas popped up with a lot of money. That changed things. Private citizen again. However, the church let it slide but not previously. Similar kind of thing.)
 
Last edited:

Laurane

Canadian Loonie
I highly doubt it. He isn't talking to blue dogs. What? There are maybe 12 blue dogs now? They vote with the mainstream Dems. Oaks has always been a Romneyesque character. He calls himself a moderate. Oaks always talks Constitution. He fails to remember that the Dems want to throw the Constitution in the trash can. If they are going to swing at politics they better figure out which side is which.

It's the article's opinion. Did you read the article? The paper is owned by Paul Huntsman...LDS.

Here's another tidbit. LDS Church President's Counselor donated to Biden. I think we see where the LDS leadership are heading.

Once it was uncovered, Uchtdorf had to start talking fast. "It wasn't me." LOL!
One of his younger relatives donated to Biden, not Dieter.
 

TKO

Veteran Member
One of his younger relatives donated to Biden, not Dieter.
Where does it say that? The only response has been an official statement. So, Uchtdorf has a bank account where his whole family has access to it. Then, the family just sends money to the Dems and puts the donation under his name? Hmm. Officially, Uchtdorf said, "These donations were made by our family using an online account, which is shared by our family and associated with my name." In reality the account is HIS account. Not just an "online family account associated with his name". I guess Uchtdorf best get his family under better control, eh? You think he still lets his entire family have access to his account? LOL! Kind of reminds me of buying forged documents from Mark Hofmann. They didn't buy them. They got others to buy them. Then, others just "donated" them to the church. No dirty hands ever. "I didn't do it! I didn't do it!"
 
Last edited:

TKO

Veteran Member
Followers of Christ REALLY pay attention to what some leader of LDS says? Hmmm. I never knew.
Call out evil when you see it.

I do care a lot about LDS news because they have fortunes to make happen what they want. They are still working with Catholic Relief Charities to flood us with Muslims...who will one day turn on them because there is no integration of them into the USA anymore. They have a senator in there who does the church's bidding...Romney. While members may not like Romney as much, they still voted him in. But an open border is what Romney and the church are after. They also want the immigration to never stop because they subcontract to CRC. It's a huge money maker. On top of that they made 6 billion dollars last year on their investment fund. That's a lot of money to do their will in politics. They are force to be reckoned with. Read up on Lone Peak. When I was a missionary, I wish I could have had a section on church investments to talk about. That would have been a good answer to some who asked about church finances. I didn't know back then, though.
 
Last edited:

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
Call out evil when you see it.
Exactly. And have the courage to walk away if you feel your church leadership is in error (regardless of what church it might be.) I say that to Catholics regularly (or a derivative thereof) but they’re so deeply indoctrinated that they can’t do it. At least I have the courage of my convictions. When the time comes that I think it’s time for me to bolt, I will. Without a moment’s hesitation.
 

bracketquant

Veteran Member
While there is a rising liberal faction of the church, as the rest of the country, i think they are at this time a minority. They are however a growing force. I see President Oaks talk as an attempt to build unity within the church and the nation and not an attack on conservatives. Most of the time someone who sets out to be a peacemaker and tries to please every one pleases no one.
Liberal faction = wolves in sheep's clothing?
 
Top