What's your point? It looks like you're letting perfect be the enemy of good. I suggest we all let him run his course. He's fighting against overwhelming odds and winning more than he loses. If you're looing for confirmation that things are working, you won't find it in the current toxic "news" coverage.No.
Trump defined MAGA.
That MAGA is long lost and left behind.
MAGA is going to the same dust bin of history that the Tea Party movement went.
I'm still MAGA.
You're still MAGA.
Trump is pushing vey little MAGA.
My point is that there is zero focus and attention to the MAGA promises that got him elected.What's your point? It looks like you're letting perfect be the enemy of good. I suggest we all let him run his course. He's fighting against overwhelming odds and winning more than he loses. If you're looing for confirmation that things are working, you won't find it in the current toxic "news" coverage.
Query: Is Hook global conservative or liberal?
AI Overview
Hook Global is a video-first digital media and geopolitics channel on YouTube that tends to feature coverage and commentary critical of right-wing figures and conservative policies, leaning more toward a progressive or liberal perspective.
Content Focus: Its programming frequently highlights criticisms of conservative politicians, Donald Trump, and related right-wing movements, while regularly featuring interviews and segments with Democratic lawmakers like Jim McGovern. General Tone: The channel utilizes critical framing and commentary regarding conservative leadership, aligning its output more closely with center-left or liberal viewpoints on current political affairs.
If it walks like a leftie duck and quacks like a leftie duck...all the im a rightie self qualifiers in the world become moot.Re: Above "Hook Global" entry.
Google AI:
And this from a Leftist leaning Google - as in "direct from another horse's mouth."
All viewpoints are treasured. One makes a decision on INFORMATION of all sort.
Discernment...
Dobbin
You are the duck... with one wing. How are your flight lessons going?If it walks like a leftie duck and quacks like a leftie duck...all the im a rightie self qualifiers in the world become moot.
I don't care if the media was from North Korea. If the message is true and applicable to our current situation, you think it is fine to deny the truth because the wrong source informed you? That is not wise at all. What kind of "discernment" buries the truth to live in delusion and bathe in lies?Re: Above "Hook Global" entry.
Google AI:
And this from a Leftist leaning Google - as in "direct from another horse's mouth."
All viewpoints are treasured. One makes a decision on INFORMATION of all sort.
Discernment...
Dobbin
Truth is sovereign. It is not subject to emotions, desires, whims, trends, rumors, delusions, elections, loud voices, crowds, repeated lies, sweet words, happy thoughts, slogans, or the weather. Truth is a Rock that cannot be shaken. Truth stands forever untarnished, unmoved, reliable."Truth," said Pilate."What is that?"
The question is how we determine what is true in the first place. What is your process, LE?
LOL....I don't care if the media was from North Korea. If the message is true and applicable to our current situation, you think it is fine to deny the truth because the wrong source informed you?


You are the duck... with one wing. How are your flight lessons going?
I don't care if the media was from North Korea. If the message is true and applicable to our current situation, you think it is fine to deny the truth because the wrong source informed you? That is not wise at all. What kind of "discernment" buries the truth to live in delusion and bathe in lies?

Bound to happen, the right has no staying power in anything they do...
Whats funny is it’s true.
I think we'll know this NovemberIt's too early to tell if MAGA is falling apart. The presidential election of 2028 will give more of a clue.
You are sadly missing the point. There is nothing wrong with rugged individualism. It is a way for a people to keep sane and hold the government accountable. With the MAGA cult, people who should be well-informed and seek justice have dumped their morals & ability to stand firm in righteousness. They believed in a happy story from a sociopathic liar that ends with them being destroyed. The happy story part has them sleeping in dreamland and breathing hopium, but the rude awakening will be a very nasty day.Bound to happen, the right has no staying power in anything they do...
Individualism takes the lead and they all think they know whats best.
The only thing i think the left have correct is they work towards goals as a unit i.e they can organize like a machine.
I didn’t say there was anything wrong with rugged individualism. My point was that if people can’t work effectively as a team, you end up with exactly what we have now…individuals operating on their own program with little interest in anything outside their own narrative. You seem to assume that anyone who disagrees with you must believe everything this administration says. That’s a pretty convenient assumption, but it doesn’t make it true. And the (hopium) argument is gay. You and others seem to have taken up the role of the jilted lover...completely buying into the politician pickup lines, getting emotionally invested in the relationship, and now insisting that anyone who doesn’t share your heartbreak must be delusional. Apparently, disagreeing with you now means someone has joined a cult, abandoned their morals, and is living in dreamland. That’s quite a leap from simply saying, (I don’t agree with you.) Maybe try reading what people actually write before assigning them beliefs they never expressed. Otherwise, you’re not arguing with them…you’re arguing with the imaginary version of them you created in your own head. And then, conveniently, you get to declare victory over that person...Its almost manic from this vantage point.You are sadly missing the point. There is nothing wrong with rugged individualism. It is a way for a people to keep sane and hold the government accountable. With the MAGA cult, people who should be well-informed and seek justice have dumped their morals & ability to stand firm in righteousness. They believed in a happy story from a sociopathic liar that ends with them being destroyed. The happy story part has them sleeping in dreamland and breathing hopium, but the rude awakening will be a very nasty day.
Not really accurate. My thought process went more toward your praising the left for being in unity, fighting for the same goals as a team. Our government was originally designed to be contentious with opposing authorities keeping each other in check and allowing reasoned arguments to find the best solutions and pathways.I didn’t say there was anything wrong with rugged individualism. My point was that if people can’t work effectively as a team, you end up with exactly what we have now…individuals operating on their own program with little interest in anything outside their own narrative. You seem to assume that anyone who disagrees with you must believe everything this administration says. That’s a pretty convenient assumption, but it doesn’t make it true. And the (hopium) argument is gay. You and others seem to have taken up the role of the jilted lover...completely buying into the politician pickup lines, getting emotionally invested in the relationship, and now insisting that anyone who doesn’t share your heartbreak must be delusional. Apparently, disagreeing with you now means someone has joined a cult, abandoned their morals, and is living in dreamland. That’s quite a leap from simply saying, (I don’t agree with you.) Maybe try reading what people actually write before assigning them beliefs they never expressed. Otherwise, you’re not arguing with them…you’re arguing with the imaginary version of them you created in your own head. And then, conveniently, you get to declare victory over that person...Its almost manic from this vantage point.
Saying they have something correct is praise??? I disagree, its an understanding of how things should work.Not really accurate. My thought process went more toward your praising the left for being in unity, fighting for the same goals as a team. Our government was originally designed to be contentious with opposing authorities keeping each other in check and allowing reasoned arguments to find the best solutions and pathways.
You are right- at times we need to be in unity to fight the gang warfare. But the problem we have today is that there is no gang in the right for us to join. So, we must stand alone until enough people wake up or we die anyway. Frankly, I think we are beyond the skirmishes. It is too late to save the country. Now it will be the choice of each to join the evil ones or be separate.
I agree with many of your things but there is a dichotomy in your thinking that seems to miss some crucial details. As for MAGA... look at the raw facts. Look at what we expected- what we voted for, and what we got. Seriously, make a list and then tell me where I am wrong. If you can do that, I will thank you for showing me the error of my ways.Saying they have something correct is praise??? I disagree, its an understanding of how things should work.
And there is/was a gang but you and others decided it wasn't good enough and bailed, telling anyone still taking part, that they are all delusional.
Agreed, which.... if you have read any of my other posts on other topics, you would know that my view is... this admin is a speed bump and we all need to use our time wisely.
Im not MAGA in the only Trump sense, Im anti democrat/communist/collectivist/socialist/Islamist...ect..ect...I agree with many of your things but there is a dichotomy in your thinking that seems to miss some crucial details. As for MAGA... look at the raw facts. Look at what we expected- what we voted for, and what we got. Seriously, make a list and then tell me where I am wrong. If you can do that, I will thank you for showing me the error of my ways.
With with the turn coats the ideas continue, but there is no new voice or face for it. After Kirk's hit job, there is no replacement. I almost think that was the idea and plan. Get rid of Charlie and the gooks have free reign in 28. Darn if they do not throw things in your face right there in the open.I've never actually seen a specific MAGA group to begin with, so it cant fall apart. To me, MAGA was a set of ideas that have been around for a long long time. MAGA was just a label that Trump put on it for marketing and campaigning.
The problem is not MAGA falling apart. The problem is the "uniparty." Of which a good proportion is made of so called "Republicans." Which include a good number of those named earlier as "critical" of the Trump Admin.I don't think MAGA is falling apart; as a whole, we are just sick to death of the crap the Republicans are pulling.
Secretary of State, etc., Marco Rubio is a quick thinker and very well spoken. He has not turned away from MAGA. Neither has Scott Bessent at Treasury, who seems to enjoy his job when it comes to sanctions. There are others in the GOP who are working closely with the administration--Mike Lee is one--and then there's Hegseth who has overseen a rise in recruitment numbers. Elon Musk has been far more able and willing to help and to keep helping. He is bringing other tech leaders along with him.With with the turn coats the ideas continue, but there is no new voice or face for it. After Kirk's hit job, there is no replacement. I almost think that was the idea and plan. Get rid of Charlie and the gooks have free reign in 28. Darn if they do not throw things in your face right there in the open.
Uniparty = oligarchy = anunaki appointed hybrid rulers. Nothing will ever change until they are gone. If you know what to look for 80% of those in power are not human.The problem is not MAGA falling apart. The problem is the "uniparty." Of which a good proportion is made of so called "Republicans." Which include a good number of those named earlier as "critical" of the Trump Admin.
Whenever a Republican attaches his name to a Trump endorsement - he does well in an election. The Republicans who do poorly are those who for whatever reason, don't get Trump endorsement, don't seek Trump endorsement, don't want Trump endorsement and usually make that known because they fancy themselves "moderates" or "bipartisan."
NOT what the voter majority wants.
Very few Republicans who don't carry the Trump "stamp of approval" do well - EXCEPT in the MEEDIA. For MEEDIA, these Trump outliers are given front and center on the front page. Like those mentioned earlier. This is all part of a media plan to discredit MAGA and picture them as "rubes."
Example currently here in Cow Hampshire. John E. Sununu attempting re-election to the Senate and is currently "Trump Endorsed." Previously the Sununu clan has fallen more easily into the Bush (Rino) camp primarily on the basis of John H. Sununu (father) who was good buds with the last Bush president. But John E. has had a revelation since his loss to Jeanne Shaheen (Democrat) in 2008. The Democrat ascendancy then and since is simply NH Republicans NOT voting for Bush Republicanism.
John E. is a "convert."
Horse predicts he will do well in the election. His opponent Chris Pappas (DSA) has SEVERAL issues with connection to HIS rank and file AND connection to "the system," such as it is.
We'll see.
Dobbin
I've long thought that senator Dick Blumenthal's face looks positively reptilian. He just radiates evil.Uniparty = oligarchy = anunaki appointed hybrid rulers. Nothing will ever change until they are gone. If you know what to look for 80% of those in power are not human.
Dick is named appropriately. I've met him a few times and a greater arsehole one has never met than he.I've long thought that senator Dick Blumenthal's face looks positively reptilian.
Explains a lot on behavior don't it?I've long thought that senator Dick Blumenthal's face looks positively reptilian.
IMO moderates or fence riders as I call them ,will sink the right...they are exactly what I have been talking about.The problem is not MAGA falling apart. The problem is the "uniparty." Of which a good proportion is made of so called "Republicans." Which include a good number of those named earlier as "critical" of the Trump Admin.
Whenever a Republican attaches his name to a Trump endorsement - he does well in an election. The Republicans who do poorly are those who for whatever reason, don't get Trump endorsement, don't seek Trump endorsement, don't want Trump endorsement and usually make that known because they fancy themselves "moderates" or "bipartisan."
NOT what the voter majority wants.
Very few Republicans who don't carry the Trump "stamp of approval" do well - EXCEPT in the MEEDIA. For MEEDIA, these Trump outliers are given front and center on the front page. Like those mentioned earlier. This is all part of a media plan to discredit MAGA and picture them as "rubes."
Example currently here in Cow Hampshire. John E. Sununu attempting re-election to the Senate and is currently "Trump Endorsed." Previously the Sununu clan has fallen more easily into the Bush (Rino) camp primarily on the basis of John H. Sununu (father) who was good buds with the last Bush president. But John E. has had a revelation since his loss to Jeanne Shaheen (Democrat) in 2008. The Democrat ascendancy then and since is simply NH Republicans NOT voting for Bush Republicanism.
John E. is a "convert."
Horse predicts he will do well in the election. His opponent Chris Pappas (DSA) has SEVERAL issues with connection to HIS rank and file AND connection to "the system," such as it is.
We'll see.
Dobbin
Bound to happen, the right has no staying power in anything they do...
Individualism takes the lead and they all think they know whats best.
The only thing i think the left have correct is they work towards goals as a unit i.e they can organize like a machine.
It's too early to tell if MAGA is falling apart. The presidential election of 2028 will give more of a clue.