WAR Iran/ US/mideast war thread - 2/28/26 Open Hostilities (Thread for Off Topic discussion started, see post #13,751, page 344)

Kushner predicts progress on Hamas disarmament in about 30 days, says deal is ‘win-win’ for Israel​

Progress in getting Hamas to give up its weapons and move forward with a Gaza peace plan could materialize in about a month, US President Donald Trump’s envoy Jared Kushner says.

“We could be seeing progress… in as little as 30 days, hopefully in starting to take some of the weapons out,” Kushner tells Fox News while in Israel.

Filling in Gaza’s Hamas tunnels could happen in the next 60 to 90 days, Kushner says.

“Progress could come quite soon, but we do need cooperation from both sides,” he says.

Kushner, who is Trump’s son-in-law, said the Israeli side voiced some “valid concerns” during his meeting earlier today with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem.

For example, the Trump administration is committed to helping rebuild Gaza — destroyed in the war that followed the Hamas-led October 7, 2023, attack.

“But we will not allow Gaza to be rebuilt until the demilitarization occurs. Nobody wants to put more money into a place… if it’s just going to be taken over by terrorists,” he says. “We’re also not going to restrict Israel’s right to defend itself if there are any imminent threats and so we had to clarify what that means.”

“For Israel we think it’s a win-win situation,” Kushner says. Either Hamas will go ahead in disarming “willingly over the next 60 to 90 days” or “Israel will have a lot more support from the US and others to go and finish the job in the appropriate way.”

Kushner says he had a “very cordial” meeting with Hamas officials, but “it’s very, very hard to trust a terrorist organization.”

“They said all the right things, so we’re going to give them a chance to perform,” he adds.


Gaza peace push: Kushner says Hamas disarmament could begin within 30 days​

US President Donald Trump’s envoy Jared Kushner said progress on Hamas disarmament and the next stage of a Gaza peace plan could begin within 30 days, following talks with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem. The discussions focused on how Hamas would surrender its weapons, who would oversee the process and when Israel could redeploy or begin reconstruction in Gaza.

Kushner said the process could move quickly if the arrangements agreed during the talks take effect.

"We could be seeing progress... in as little as 30 days, hopefully starting to take some of the weapons out, and hopefully, you know, filling in some of the tunnels as well," Kushner told Fox News while in Tel Aviv.

Kushner and Netanyahu agreed that an American general would oversee and verify Hamas's disarmament, according to an Israeli official. Netanyahu has also insisted that Israel will not withdraw from Gaza until the process is completed.

The understanding represents a fresh effort by the Trump administration to address Israeli concerns after Netanyahu publicly rejected the latest stage of a US plan intended to end the Gaza war.

American general to oversee weapons handover

Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and a longtime family friend of Netanyahu, met the Israeli prime minister a day after holding rare direct talks with Hamas in Egypt. Hamas has publicly committed itself to the plan.

The Israeli official said the two sides "agreed that no redeployment or reconstruction would take place in the Gaza Strip before Hamas is disarmed throughout Gaza".

"It was also agreed that the first step toward the demilitarisation of the Strip would be to require Hamas to hand over its weapons for decommissioning under the supervision of an American general," the official said.

A roadmap agreed by Hamas on July 30 had proposed that the International Stabilization Force supervise the decommissioning of weapons. The force, which aims to deploy to Gaza if conditions improve, is led by US Major General Jasper Jeffers.

Hamas had also pledged to transfer its weapons to a new Palestinian governing body. Netanyahu has expressed scepticism about that arrangement, while Trump has described it as a breakthrough.

Trump’s Board of Peace backs Israel’s right to act

An official from Trump's "Board of Peace", which is responsible for implementing the agreement, said all weapons collected from Hamas would be permanently taken out of use.

"Every weapon collected will be fully decommissioned so it cannot be used again," the official said, adding that Israel "retains its full right of self-defence".

"If Hamas resorts to terror, violence or attempts to rearm, Israel will retain the right to act accordingly," the official said.

Former British prime minister Tony Blair was among other Board of Peace members who joined Kushner in the talks.

Hamas seeks pressure on Netanyahu

During his talks in Egypt, Kushner pressed Hamas to demonstrate that it was giving up its weapons and to renounce any future role in governing Gaza, according to sources involved in the negotiations.

Hamas, whose unprecedented October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war, was represented in the talks by its new leader Khalil al-Hayya.

A Hamas official said the group told Kushner it remained committed to the Gaza plan and wanted pressure placed on Netanyahu.

Netanyahu faces pressure at home

Netanyahu, Israel's longest-serving prime minister, has increasingly challenged Trump as he faces a tough re-election contest on October 27.

The Israeli prime minister has also voiced dissatisfaction with Trump's decision to halt the US-Israeli war on Iran that began in February and instead pursue a settlement with Tehran's clerical leadership.

Far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir has taken an even harder line on Gaza.

In an interview that drew widespread attention in the Arab world, Ben Gvir said Israel should kill 30 to 40 people every night in Gaza.

"Not only those who endanger you right now. These are people who shouldn't be alive," he told a podcast hosted by a former Gaza hostage. "I'm paying them a compliment by calling them humans."

Herzog welcomes peace efforts

President Isaac Herzog, whose role is largely ceremonial, took a more positive position during his meeting with Kushner.

Herzog praised the Board of Peace's "efforts to ensure a brighter and more secure future" for Israel, Gaza and the wider region.

Meanwhile, Israeli military operations and casualties continue to shape the situation on the ground.


-----

Jared Kushner, after meeting with Netanyahu, says that the US won't "restrict Israel's right to defend itself."

He says that if Hamas doesn't disarm over the next 60 to 90 days it'll show "they're not genuine about peace," and it'll give Israel cover to "go and finish the job."

"For Israel, we think this is a win-win situation…"

Win-win for Israel = mission accomplished!

View: http://twitter.com/infolibnews/status/2089435911989649757?s=20

rt 1:05
 

BREAKING Larry Johnson:”Iran Is Done Playing Defense”-Insiders WARN of a Strike on a US Warship​

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrO3oTfA2N8

Run time - 30:57
Aug 17, 2026

Iran has moved from defensive to offensive posture — and sources in Tehran and Islamabad tell Transition Protocol the next step under discussion is an attack on a US Navy warship. Meanwhile, the American fleet enforcing the Iran blockade in the Strait of Hormuz is running out of food, having lost its forward resupply warehouses in Bahrain and Oman and half its fast combat supply ships to a decade-old budget cut.

Today the US–Iran MOU officially expired. Larry Johnson and Zulfiqar Ali break down what happens next.In this episode: why Donald Trump threatened to bomb Oman, and the Hormuz transit-fee agreement that likely triggered it; why oil moving off ships is reportedly changing hands as high as $260 a barrel while the tanker ETF has gone from $67 to $387 since February; why the global diesel and aviation fuel shortage cannot be solved by pumping more crude; how BRICS, China’s CIPS payment system and six new Pakistani overland routes have made sanctioning Iran into isolation impossible; why the Turkey–Pakistan–Saudi Mecca pact cannot fight for 12 to 18 months; and what was reportedly discussed about the nuclear option at Camp David this weekend.

Larry Johnson spent 27 years in US intelligence and counterterrorism, including the CIA and the State Department’s Office of Counterterrorism, and has run joint military operations planning for over two decades. Zulfiqar Ali reports with direct visibility into decision-making circles in Tehran and Islamabad.

Transition Protocol is a serious, source-driven geopolitical and economic analysis channel focused on evidence-based reporting and high-signal breakdowns of global power shifts and their financial consequences. Some claims in this episode are source-based and developing; each is identified as such on screen. Nothing here is investment advice.
 
EndGameWW3 @EndGameWW3 Iraqi media: Explosion at an oil tanker depot in Sulaymaniyah.
Haven’t had a chance to do much checking. However YouTube is reporting multiple boats burning at Kish Island and Tousi had a headline about a major fire in Iran, reported maybe an hour ago. Quite possible all are fires are really the same one. Do more checking as time permits. Type in ‘fire in Iran’ on YouTube to check for yourself.
 
Iran War map and info links...
 
It seems more than one fire. Tousi is showing a new ‘gas leak’ explosion and fire in the northeast of Iran. It has happened at some kind of commercial center, which happened to house a number of businesses connected to the IRGC. At the time of the report the fire was still blazing, so an accurate cause is unknown for now. YouTube is showing boats in the water going up in flames.

EDIT TO CORRECT: Facebook, not YouTube.
 
Posted for fair use......

COMMENTARY
Commodities

China eases Iran war aluminium shock, but at a cost​

https://www.reuters.com/authors/andy-home/
Andy Home
August 17, 2026 11:00 PM PDT Updated 2 hours ago

LONDON, Aug 18 (Reuters) - China has emerged as a significant swing supplier of aluminium to a Western market that is reeling from the loss of production in the Gulf due to the Iran war.

The world's top aluminium producer has lifted exports of primary metal, alloy and semi-manufactured products (semis), helping cushion the impact on the global supply chain.

From China's perspective, the timing has been fortuitous. National production is running at record ‌levels even as domestic demand growth stutters.

However, while China's exports have provided short-term relief to the market, there may be a longer-term catch.

The composition of China's aluminium export flows is determined primarily by tax code. Primary metal attracts a hefty 30% export tax, while both alloy and semis can exit the country at a zero tax rate.

It should come as no surprise, then, that most of China's current outbound volumes are in the form of alloy and products such as bar, rod and tube.

That's not to say that exports of primary metal haven't also responded. First-half volumes rose by 32% year-on-year to 38,400 metric tons, but most of this metal ⁠is likely Western aluminium stored in bonded warehouses and now being rerouted to Western markets.

For example, China "exported" 9,700 tons to the U.S. in January-June but U.S. customs counted only 70 tons of Chinese imports over the same time frame.

Exports of alloy are growing faster, nearly doubling to 238,500 tons in the first six months of 2026. Indeed, China turned into a net exporter of alloy in June for the first time since 2019.

Meanwhile, the country pumped out an extra 500,000 tons of semis, with cumulative volumes up 18% year-on-year at 3.2 million tons in January to June.

Shipments are still accelerating. June's tally of 695,000 tons marked a new monthly record.

DISPLACEMENT​

These product exports can't directly replace the primary metal and alloy units lost in the Gulf. Instead, they act to suppress demand for unwrought metal by substituting for it further along the processing chain.

And therein lies the rub.

The result is a relocation of fabricating activity from the rest of the world to China.

China's semis exports have long been a bone of contention with Western policymakers and many countries have hit back with steep anti-dumping tariffs across a wide spectrum of products.

Partly in response ‌to such ⁠concerns, Beijing removed a 13% value-added tax (VAT) export rebate on products, effective December 2024.

Export volumes dropped by 18% to 890,000 tons last year as Chinese processors pivoted to the domestic market.

But the Iran war has changed the dynamic again, reinvigorating outbound flows thanks to the combination of a structurally stressed Western supply chain and a loose internal market.

COST OF COMFORT​

Chinese aluminium demand has been flatlining over the first half of 2026, according to analysts at Citi. The bank's end-use tracker index fell by 0.4% year-on-year, reflecting weakness in traditional end-use sectors, particularly construction.

Primary aluminium production, meanwhile, grew by 2.2% over the same period, ⁠according to the International Aluminium Institute. The country's smelters are now operating close to or even slightly above Beijing's mandated 45-million-ton-per-year capacity cap.

Stocks registered with the Shanghai Futures Exchange have been sliding in recent weeks but, at 422,097 tons, are still higher than London Metal Exchange inventory of 358,000 tons, including metal in off-warrant storage.

China clearly has the capacity to maintain exports at elevated levels for a ⁠while yet.

This has comforted the LME market, where aluminium has unwound most of its war premium. The three-month price has pulled back from a four-year high of $3,787.50 per ton at the start of June to $3,270.00, a mere $100 or so higher than where it was before the U.S. and Israel attacked Iran on February 28.

However, the longer the West needs Chinese products ⁠to rebalance, the greater the potential long-term cost for Western manufacturers of semi-finished products.

(The opinions expressed here are those of Andy Home, a columnist for Reuters.)

Writing by Andy Home;Editing by Marguerita Choy
 
Posted for fair use......


Geopolitics

Peace more dangerous than war for Iran’s new leaders — Bloomberg analysis

By Marc Champion / Bloomberg
18 Aug 2026, 01:17 pm

(Aug 18): Earlier this year, as the Islamic Republic of Iran was busy crushing the largest protests since those in the aftermath of the 1979 revolution, President Donald Trump promised that help was on its way. He meant, of course, that the US would ride to the rescue of the ordinary Iranians being slaughtered in the streets. Instead, he launched a war that’s given a new lease on life to the regime that was killing them.

This may seem an implausible claim, given that the US and Israel decapitated Iran’s top leadership in the first hours of the conflict, before going on to destroy its conventional navy, factories and swathes of the economy. But it’s becoming clear that even as Washington searches for an off-ramp from the fighting, Tehran’s leaders want to continue or even expand it, because for them, peace is more dangerous than war.

Trump’s motivations are as clear as his messaging is inconsistent. He expected the regime to collapse within days or weeks, making him the heroic US leader who finally had the courage to solve America’s 47-year-old Iran problem. None of that happened and American voters don’t want another Middle Eastern “forever war”. Now he hopes to escape the consequences of his mistake by returning to the pre-war US policy of pressuring Iran through economic sanctions. But Iran has other ideas, as does Israel, which this weekend hit Lebanon hard at the risk of provoking an Iranian response.

From the point of view of the increasingly powerful generals who run Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, or IRGC, this war is existential and — as The Wall Street Journal reported on Monday — they’re convinced it has only just begun. The bigger backdrop to this Iranian stance is the fact that it isn’t just the US and Israel that want the regime gone; so does a majority of its own population. The Islamic Republic’s new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei has no better solutions for the soaring inflation and still deeper economic failures that sparked January’s protests than did his father — and the economy is in even worse shape today.

There has been a debate within the regime about how best to ensure its survival in the face of these dual foreign and domestic threats. Pragmatists, such as President Masoud Pezeshkian, saw the priority as ensuring economic recovery, which would require ending the fighting, but he lost that argument. Iran has instead sent Washington a list of demands for reopening the Strait of Hormuz that’s so uncompromising it seems designed for rejection.

An overhaul of Tehran’s top security personnel last week aims to consolidate around a long-war strategy. On Sunday, Yadollah Javani, the deputy IRGC commander for political affairs, became just the latest senior officer to announce that the military was shifting to offence from defence. The regular army, known as the Artesh, has been put under IRGC control. Its commander, Major General Amir Hatami, has announced a US$30,000 (RM121,755) reward for the killing or capture of any US soldier. Tehran’s new public message on Hormuz is that it controls the flow of shipping through the strait and will under no circumstances give up the geopolitical leverage and deterrent power that this provides.

Meanwhile, repression is accelerating under cover of war. Legislation ostensibly aimed at espionage and collaboration with the enemy, introduced late last year, has turned crimes that once carried jail terms into capital offences. The number of people executed hasn’t necessarily increased (last year saw the highest number killed since 1989, averaging four to five executions per day), but the proportion of political prisoners among them has.

I spoke about this with Mahmood Amiry-Moghaddam, a professor of neuroscience who also founded a Norway-based nonprofit called Iran Human Rights, to track Iran’s use of the death penalty. So far this year, he said, the regime has executed 28 political prisoners, up from two in 2025. Of the 26 who were protesters, at least two have been hanged in public at the scene of their alleged crime. With another 70 protesters on death row in the city of Isfahan’s main prison alone, Amiry-Moghaddam is very concerned that this officially sanctioned carnage will grow.

Now the Basij, a militia of ideologically driven thugs that the IRGC uses to put down protests, has been given a new head who led previous crackdowns and has been tasked with turning the group into an intelligence network. A law “to curb foreign influence” is wending its way through the Iranian Majlis, or Parliament. This will criminalise any communication with media from countries considered hostile to the Islamic Republic, while interviews with all other foreign media would require prior permission from the intelligence ministry. Long a police state, Iran is becoming a prison.

This suits the IRGC and other hardliners. If left to face their own people with no state of war to cow them into quiescence, this regime simply would not be able to answer their complaints. It is too invested in the corrupt economic system it has developed and its officials lack the skills needed for effective reform and economic management.

On top of this, Iran’s leaders believe — again, not without reason — that they are winning this war in ways they were unable to do before, and they want to press the advantage. They see in Trump’s Feb. 28 overreach an opportunity for the Islamic Republic to press for the US retreat from the Middle East that it has sought since the day it took 52 American diplomats and other citizens hostage in November 1979.

This doesn’t mean that as the 60-day ceasefire negotiated between the US and Iran expired, the IRGC now wants to return to full-scale warfare. That would carry its own risks and is not required to keep the US and its allies under pressure in the Gulf, while maintaining a state of emergency and paranoid repression at home.

What the IRGC’s preference for continued conflict does mean, though, is that while Trump would like to pivot back to economic from military warfare, the regime won’t necessarily let him make that transition. It has used the 60-day ceasefire to restructure its command and rebuild missile and drone stocks in preparation for a longer war, and it now feels ready.

Khamenei and his generals may be overplaying their hand. Enough Gulf state oil still flows through Hormuz to prevent a global oil-price crisis and while the US and its allies have run down their stocks of air defence missiles, they could yet choose to expend the rest against Iran. But so long as the IRGC has the capacity to fire on tankers, US military bases and critical energy and water infrastructure in the Gulf, Tehran will have a veto on peace.

Uploaded by Tham Yek Lee
 
Posted for fair use......

Ross Harrison / August 18, 2026

The Iran War Was Always About Regime Change​


The conflict affirms the Islamic Republic’s longtime belief that the U.S. seeks nothing short of its overthrow.

World Events


Wars don’t just end. They get interpreted, reinterpreted, and turned into strategic doctrine. That is what happened after the Iran-Iraq War of the 1980s, a conflict that saw the United States back Tehran’s Iraqi adversaries. The war taught Tehran three lessons it never unlearned: that Washington wants the Islamic Republic gone, that Iran stands essentially alone in the world, and that it cannot survive a direct, overt fight with the U.S. and Israel.

In other words, it can only prevail through an indirect, ambiguous confrontation. Those lessons have governed four decades of Iranian behavior: the support for proxies like Hezbollah and the Houthis, the nuclear brinkmanship, and the refusal to trust any American overture.

Now Iran has fought two more wars, in 2025 and 2026, and it is drawing new lessons on top of the old ones. Washington should pay close attention to what those lessons are, because they will shape Iranian strategy for years to come.

One takeaway is that the latest two conflicts are just a continuation of a war Iran has been fighting with America over regime change for more than four decades, when the Iran-Iraq war was viewed, in the words of Iranian revolutionary leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, as America’s hand coming through Saddam’s sleeve.”

The temptation in Washington will be to read the damage inflicted on Iran during the 2026 war as having rendered Iran weak and vulnerable. While Iran’s infrastructure and economy were battered, the reading that Iran is strategically weaker is likely to be wrong, and dangerously so. Iran will believe that it, like North Vietnam at the end of its war with America, successfully denied the largest military on earth its goal of regime change. And regardless of how the war ends, Iran will cling to the core belief that has anchored its foreign policy since 1988: that the dispute with the United States was never really about the nuclear program, or missiles, or any other specific policy file. It was, and will remain, about the nature of the regime in Tehran itself.

Every American escalation since the 2018 withdrawal from the nuclear deal—from the maximum pressure sanctions campaign, the killing of Quds Force commander Qassem Suleimani, and now two wars in two years—has only deepened that conviction in Tehran. Diplomacy, when and if it happens, will be conducted by a government that sees it as risk management, not reconciliation. Of course, Tehran’s distrust of the potential for rapprochement has been mirrored in Washington due to Iran’s long history of eliminationist rhetoric aimed at Israel and its commitment to rid the region of U.S. influence.

What is genuinely new is how Iran will likely choose to defend itself going forward. For decades, Tehran hid behind an “axis of resistance”—Hezbollah, Hamas, Iraqi militias, and the Houthis—precisely because it could not match American or Israeli power directly. The ambiguity and deniability of never quite being the one to pull the trigger was the whole point. It let Iran deter its enemies without inviting the kind of direct war it could not win.

That logic has been dying since Hamas’ attack on Israel in October 2023, and the wars of the past two years have likely accelerated Iran’s shift to another strategic logic involving more direct confrontations. Israel showed it could and would strike Iranian soil and Iranian officials directly, proxies or no proxies. As a result, Iran has emerged from the shadows and is no longer hiding behind its militias.

Expect a more overt Iran from the 2026 war, one that leans less on militias alone and more on its own missiles, drones, and the standing threat to choke off the Strait of Hormuz. The goal isn’t victory in a conventional sense; instead, it’s making further escalation in this war and any future war too costly and chaotic for Washington and Jerusalem to consider. Whether that gamble makes Iran safer or simply more likely to stumble into the next war is an open question, and the central one for the region’s near future.

Iran’s postwar foreign policy is likely neither the darkest nor the rosiest scenario. Iran is unlikely to retreat into pure “fortress” isolation—treating the Gulf states as hostages and giving up on diplomacy altogether—given the need for ideology to give way to economic exigencies. Nor is it likely to pursue a Vietnam-style transformation by trading resistance for regional integration. That kind of transformation, if it comes at all, is a project of decades, not months or even years.

The more likely path is a harder one for Washington to counter: an Iran that keeps its finger on the trigger while engaging in diplomacy with its Gulf Arab neighbors, offering trade and stability with one hand while holding the threat of missiles and a closed Strait of Hormuz in the other. In other words, combining menace with diplomacy is likely to be the recipe, given Iran’s perceived need to actively deter its enemies but also to address the economic woes and resultant social discontent it will face after the shooting stops.

This approach could work. The 2025 and 2026 wars haven’t just battered the Islamic Republic; they have also unsettled its neighbors. Gulf Arab states watched Iranian missiles fly and, at the same time, watched Washington’s commitment to their security look less steadfast than advertised. That double exposure has left several Gulf capitals quietly asking whether their long-term security lies in permanent dependence on the United States or in some accommodation with Tehran as a strategic hedge.

Given these lessons, Washington’s task is not to persuade Tehran that regime change isn’t the goal, but to shape what Iran does with the confidence and the anger it takes out of this war. The instinct to double down on containment, arming Israel and the Gulf Arab states to box Iran in, is understandable. It is also likely to backfire, as before, confirming Tehran’s worst assumptions and potentially endangering Gulf states with further Iranian aggression. The better bet is to make room for exactly the kind of regional diplomacy Iran itself may now be inclined to try, and to judge any resulting arrangements not by whether they resolve everything, but by whether they move Iranian behavior in a more constructive direction.

The United States has spent four decades assuming enough pressure would eventually break Iran’s strategic calculus of resistance to U.S. efforts in the region. It never has. The Islamic Republic’s leaders believe they have been fighting one long war with Washington since 1979, and everything in the past two years has validated that.

The only real question left is what kind of Iran comes out the other side, a cornered one, or one looking, warily, for a way to change the terms of the fight. The answer isn’t written yet. But American policy over the next few years will help write it.


Photo of Ross Harrison

Ross Harrison

Ross Harrison is a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute and author of the new book Decoding Iran’s Foreign Policy: Strategic Interests, Power and Influence.
 
Open Source Intel @Osint613
US Special Envoy to Syria Tom Barrack:

We are deeply concerned that the confirmed Israeli airstrikes on Abu al-Duhur Airbase constitute an unnecessary escalation that does not advance regional stability.

The Al-Sharaa government has neither adopted a predatory posture nor maintained proxy forces. It has, in fact, repeatedly indicated a preference for de-escalation with Israel.

The United States has in the past, and will continue in the future, to host discussions to encourage diplomatic cadence over kinetic frustration for both nations.

The United States continues to believe that restraint and engagement offer the more constructive course. We encourage all parties to prioritize logical discourse over further military incidents.
 

Victor Davis Hanson: What Is Actually Happening in Iran?​

Under 10 minutes
I must say one thing about this from the 'skin in the game' P.O.V. I'm certain that when Mr. Hanson says you can't take American dollars into Iran he is speaking on a governmental or industrial level. I'm equally certain that this is true. But from personal knowledge, which I have mentioned on this thread, when it comes to individual people, it happens. It is a problem with the people checking your bags on arrival. However, it is one they are getting around. From first-hand knowledge Iranians traveling back home, having as many $100 bills in your pocket as you can happens every day.

Being realistic 1,000 people going into Iran with $1,000 each only works out to 1 million bucks. That would hardly be enough to fund a war. And those people are more interested in spending that money on personal needs than war. But on a small scale, American dollars are still making their way into Iran.
 
Last edited:
EndGameWW3 @EndGameWW3
Update: Gulf News: UAE suspends trade, financial transactions and activities with Iran

The UAE has ordered a halt to all activities, trade exchanges and financial transactions with Iran until further notice, according to the Strategic Communications Director at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

The directive covers activities and commercial exchanges with Iran, as well as financial transactions, with further details expected from the authorities.
 

US Navy blockade has caused Iran’s oil exports to crater — and could finally destabilize regime: expert​

Iran’s oil exports have dropped to nearly zero under the renewed US naval blockade, according to analysis from a former senior US Treasury official — who predicts that the economic impacts could hit the elite and destabilize the regime within two to three months.

Iran’s ability to ship oil out of the Strait of Hormuz to offset its current economic woes has hit a wall under the new blockade, with little to no activity seen at its Kharg Island hub, according to recent satellite images.

As Iran and the US attempt to use economic pressures to see who will blink first, Miad Maleki, who served in the Treasury under President Trump and Joe Biden, said Tehran’s regime will finally run out of room to maneuver this fall.

“The blockade has exposed Iran’s biggest economic vulnerability,” said Maleki, who now works at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies think tank.

“Iran’s oil clock is running down and the real fiscal shock is going to hit in the fall when all their payments come due,” he added.

Iran notably pays its troops, government employees, security forces and industrial workers in cycles, with about 60% of the money coming from its oil exports, Maleki said.

If its exports continue to be hamstrung in the next cycle, the regime will have few options to shield its soldiers and elites from the economic shock.

While the regime has proven that it can endure economic pains suffered by everyday citizens, its attitude will likely change once members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and the wealthy elite start complaining, Maleki said.

Trump, who has previously boasted that Iran has no money to pay its troops, signaled that he would maintain full economic pressures on Iran.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has also threatened more penalties to come for the Islamic republic.

Bessent warned that the so-called Operation Economic Fury would roll out additional measures after already taking increasingly aggressive actions to sanction money-changers, cryptocurrency and other sources of revenue for Iran.

The goal is be to hit Iran with “economic isolation like the world has never seen before,” he told Newsmax’s Rob Schmitt last week.

Iran, meanwhile, believes it can outlast the US in a game of economic chicken as the war has also taken its toll on America’s economy and created some backlash against the president.

 
A lot of issues but all is still punctuated by the bigger issue of logistics due to the loss of forward supply bases and the shortage of forward supply vessels.
--------------------------------
Streamed live 3 hours ago

In a special livestream episode, Sal "Famous" Mercogliano, host of the "What's Going on With Shipping?" YouTube channel, rejoins Mooch to discuss the Navy's recent decision to move the USS George Washington (CVN 73) from the western Pacific to the North Arabian Sea to replace the USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72), a sister carrier that has been in the headlines lately due to reports of poor living conditions and sailor suicide ideations, including one jumping overboard.What's really going on aboard LINCOLN, and what does this move say about the fleet's ability to cover multiple theaters at once?


RUNTIME 1:22:14

The Real Truth About WASHINGTON Replacing LINCOLN​

View: https://youtu.be/uy0Eo7Ezgeg
 
Last edited:

Economists Say Iran Faces ‘Severe Collapse’ of Economy Under Blockade​

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth said on Thursday that the United States can maintain its blockade of Iran “indefinitely,” while economists said the Iranian economy is rapidly approaching the point of “severe collapse” under the pressure.

“Indefinitely the United States Navy can maintain a blockade like that because we’ll rotate ships in and out, as we have, and we’ll continue to,” Hegseth told reporters Thursday.

The U.S. Navy said on Thursday that the carrier USS George Washington is on its way to the Middle East from Vietnam and is currently in the Strait of Malacca between the Pacific and Indian oceans.

The Wall Street Journal reported Thursday that the USS George Washington will replace USS Abraham Lincoln, which has been deployed for over 240 days. The Lincoln has reportedly suffered personnel, supply, and mechanical problems from its long deployment, although Hegseth dismissed those reports as “completely misrepresented” on Thursday.

Radio Free Europe (RFE) interviewed some Iranians on Thursday who said that even life in the capital of Tehran is becoming unbearable, with sky-high consumer prices and chronic shortages of goods.

“As things disappear from the dining table, fruit goes first, then dairy products, then anything considered non-essential. Ultimately, everything we buy is only essentials, but even then, nothing is affordable,” said a woman in Tehran who spoke anonymously, fearing reprisals from the regime.

“Planning for tomorrow no longer feels possible. Saving money is like trying to hold water in a sieve: its value keeps slipping away,” she said.

Another source in Tehran said the price of eggs and potatoes is skyrocketing week by week, and bread costs twice as much as it did a year ago.

“Don’t even get me started on fruit — it’s extremely expensive. We simply can’t afford it. We run out of money before the end of the month,” the second source said.

London-based economic analyst Masoumeh Taherkhani told RFE that Iran’s economy “was already in serious trouble” before the war – as demonstrated by the January uprising that Iran could only suppress by murdering thousands of its own people – and is now “heading toward a period of severe stagflation, and possibly even hyperinflation.”

“Within less than a year, the economy could be approaching a severe collapse, which could mark a major turning point,” he predicted.

Forbes analysts said on Friday that the U.S. economy was likely to remain fairly stable through most scenarios for the outcome of the conflict – even if Iran ends up controlling the Strait of Hormuz and extorting “fees” from international shipping.

This estimate was based, in part, on the enthusiastic efforts of other Middle Eastern oil-producing nations to develop other routes around the Strait of Hormuz – a process that would likely accelerate if Iran attempts to impose high tolls on traffic.

“Strait of Hormuz tolls would not increase the world price of oil, and this fact is central to the economic forecast. Tolls would reduce net proceeds for the non-Iranian oil producers, but not raise world price,” Forbes said.

Other countries might not fare as well, including the United Kingdom, which could see its encouraging GDP growth slow to only 0.3 percent next year unless the Hormuz crisis is resolved.

The London-based National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) said on Thursday that the regime in Tehran is not dealing well with its “crisis of political and economic paralysis,” pointing to a trial run of gas price controls that collapsed under a wave of “public hostility” in a matter of hours.

NCRI said Iran is having a great deal of difficulty exporting oil or importing refined fuels, and its own refineries are primitive and poorly maintained, so a nation floating on a sea of oil finds itself facing a fuel crisis.

Iranian sources said the daily demand for fuel is already outpacing production by 14 million liters, so motorists are facing strict fuel rationing, and “public anger has reached a boiling point” in sweltering cities that cannot afford air conditioning.

Like RFE’s analyst, NCRI anticipated “a historic macroeconomic collapse,” possibly on an even more aggressive timetable. President Trump’s estimate of “300% inflation” has not arrived just yet, but the national average is now 96 percent, with some provinces suffering 115 percent to 120 percent rates. Public demonstrations against the regime are beginning to spin up again, and so far the regime has not murdered the demonstrators.

“Hemmed in by foreign blockades, industrial bankruptcy, and a populace no longer willing to absorb economic shocks, Tehran’s clerical elite is rapidly running out of room to maneuver,” NCRI concluded.

 

EXCLUSIVE PEPE: Trump’s Secret Iran Backchannel COLLAPSED-Pak Army Chief Refused Trump’s Request​

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUgVI5uCQB8

Run time - 47:32
Aug 18, 2026

The U.S.-Iran Memorandum of Understanding has expired — and this episode reveals exactly why. Pepe Escobar and Zulfiqar Ali break down two secret back-channel plays Washington ran to bypass Pakistan and reach Iran’s military command directly, why IRGC leadership refused both times, and what Iran’s newly appointed #2 official signaled by shifting toward "offense."

The conversation goes deep on nuclear-normalization talk reportedly circulating in Washington, Iran’s retaliation posture, Pakistan’s damaged mediator role, and the upcoming BRICS Summit in New Delhi where Iran, Russia, and China’s presidents are expected to meet.Pepe

Escobar is a globally recognized, veteran geopolitical journalist with decades of on-the-ground reporting across Eurasia; Zulfiqar Ali hosts Transition Protocol with direct sourcing inside regional decision-making circles.

This is Transition Protocol — independent, source-driven analysis of the shift away from a unipolar world order. Subscribe for continuing coverage of the Iran-U.S. standoff, and join our Substack for twice-weekly deep intelligence briefings.
 

Iran's attack on Kurdistan may signal new phase in Tehran's regional drone warfare - analysis​

Iran carried out a drone attack on the office of the Kurdistan Regional Government’s prime minister’s office on August 17. The attack took place in the early hours and the autonomous KRG government quickly determined that Iran had used new jet-powered drones in the attack.

Masrour Barzani, the KRG prime minister, wrote on X/Twitter that “based on information and investigations conducted by the Counter-Terrorism Directorate in the Kurdistan Region, it has been confirmed that my personal office and the residence of the President of the Parastin Agency were subjected today to Iranian attacks using drones.”

He added “as I strongly condemn these reckless and unacceptable aggressions in the strongest terms, I affirm that they constitute a dangerous escalation and a direct threat to the security and stability of the region, and such attacks will not deter us from continuing to carry out our duties and protecting our citizens.”

The attack came a day after a report at Axios noted that KRG President Nechirvan Barzani had been tapped by the US as a possible backchannel in diplomacy with Iran. Nechirvan and Masrour are related, and both come from the Barzani family that runs the KDP party, the largest Kurdish party in Iraq.

The role of Nechirvan was later confirmed in a second report at Iran International. It is not clear if Iran carried out the drone attack in the context of sending a message to the Kurdistan Region or to the US. The US has apparently been giving the cold shoulder to new talks with Iran.

Iran may have used attack to showcase drone

The Kurdistan Region has been attacked more than 1,000 times by Iran and its proxies since the US and Israeli strikes on Iran in February. Nechirvan Barzani’s resident was targeted in March. The escalation in attacks, now targeting Masrour Barzani, illustrates how Iran is willing to continue to cross red lines.

Iran is seeking to inflame the region and spread the war to new fronts. Iraq is a front. Iranian-backed militias attacked Saudi Arabia from Iraq over the last month. Iraq is being pressured by the US to rein in and disarm the militias. However, other disarmament initiatives in Gaza and Lebanon, where Iranian-backed terrorist groups operate, have not been successful so far.

What did the KRG say about the drone attack. “The Kurdistan Counter-Terrorism Unit has confirmed that at 00:28 on Monday (17 August 2026), Iran launched two explosives-laden Hadid-110 drones across the border, targeting the prime minister’s private office (at KRG headquarters) and the home of the head of the KRG Security and Intelligence Agency (in Pirmam District, Erbil Governorate),” the KRG said.

The Hadid 110 is an Iranian drone that was unveiled in February 2025. It was then supplied to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corp. It is supposed to be able to fly at a higher speed than piston-driven drones that use propellers. It is also supposed to have more “steal” than other Iranian drones. It is not clear how the KRG knew it was this type of drone.

If the use of this drone is confirmed it would show how Iran is innovating. Iran has been innovating in drone warfare since the 1980s. In 2020 Iran sent Shahed 136 drones to the Houthis in Yemen.

Up until that time this type of delta-wing design had not been widely used. After it was provided to the Houthis, Iran exported it to Russia and Moscow used it extensively against Ukraine. It’s possible the attack on Barzani’s office is a way for Iran to show the capabilities of the drone.

Iran has attacked the Kurdistan Region in the past to use its missiles and drones there as a kind of test bed. Iran knows that the KRG can’t respond. It also knows the KRG lacks defenses.

For instance, Iran used its Fateh-110 missiles in an attack on a Kurdish Iranian opposition group in Koya in the Kurdistan Region of northern Iraq in 2018.

Iran then exported drones to Iranian-backed militias in Iraq. These were used increasingly in 2022-2022 in attacks in Iraq and then in Syria. The goal of Iran was to showcase new drone capabilities. For instance, Iran attacked Saudi Arabia’s Abqaiq energy facility in 2019.

Attack part of new war effort by Tehran

Iran was raising the curtain between 2019 and 2023 on how it would fight the US in the case of a conflict. It spread drone threats all over the region. Kataib Hezollah, an Iranian-backed militia in Iraq, attacked Saudi Arabia and also attacked US forces in Jordan in January 2024. The Iraqi militias also targeted Israel.

It is clear that the Iranian threat to the KRG and Barzani is part of this growing war effort by Tehran. Reports indicate Iran is also considering wider and new actions in the Gulf or against Kuwait. As such, Iran is seeking to be innovative in its threats and attacks. It wants to drive the US from the Gulf and force the US to relocate forces further away.

Iran knows the US is supposed to leave Iraq on September 30. This may include redeploying from the Kurdistan Region as well. The US has wrapped up its military operations in Syria. Tehran sees wins on numerous fronts as the US presence changes.

It should be recalled the US also left Afghanistan, which is on the border with Iran. Although Iran’s foreign minister appeared to deny the attack on the Kurdistan Region, he also claimed it was a “false flag” attack. Iran wants to muddy the waters through this denial.

The goal is that Iran wants to say to the Kurdistan Region that it should be careful. Claiming a “false flag” is supposed to give Erbil a way to climb-down from any escalation.

Although most countries in the region, such as Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Qatar, condemned the attack on the Kurdistan Region, most of these countries won’t do anything about it. The US, UK and EU also condemned the attack. However, it’s not clear if any country will bolster support for the Kurdistan Region. As such, Iran may have crossed a red line, but it wants to show it can redraw where the red lines exist in the Middle East.

 
Posted for fair use......

US weighs scaling back Middle East military presence after months of Iranian attacks - report​

CENTCOM chief Adm. Brad Cooper has been involved in the discussions, one source said, adding that he supports discussing the relocation of Gulf troops westward.

By LEO FEIERBERG BETTER
AUGUST 19, 2026 04:40 Updated: AUGUST 19, 2026 04:58

The US is considering scaling back its military presence in the Middle East as a result of the war with Iran, The Washington Post reported Tuesday, citing several officials familiar with the matter.

The Pentagon's policy office is leading the current evaluations, one source told the newspaper, adding that the Joint Staff and US Central Command (CENTCOM) are also taking part.

The issue is expected to cause a rift between hawkish members of the administration who tend to favor more intervention and the dovish, non-interventionist camp, The Washington Post cited another source as saying.

CENTCOM chief Adm. Brad Cooper has been involved in the discussions, one source said, adding that he supports discussing the relocation of Gulf troops westward.

US bases were, in some cases, evacuated before Feb. strikes

The Persian Gulf is one of the major arenas in which the Pentagon is looking at making cuts, the report cited two sources as saying. In some cases, it, the US is considering not rebuilding bases damaged by Iran during the recent fighting.

Many of these bases were evacuated in February before the US and Israel launched strikes on Iran, a person familiar with the details told the newspaper, saying that the bases were considered vulnerable to drone and missile attacks.

"Iran thinks we are in the traditional places," they said.

A CENTCOM spokesperson declined to comment on the report.

The US currently houses troops and military infrastructure in several countries in the Middle East, including Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait, the UAE, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and Jordan. The US maintains temporary facilities in other countries, such as Israel.

After the launch of Operation Epic Fury, Iran responded with attacks on Gulf states that housed US troops, launching thousands of ballistic missiles and one-way drones over the course of months.

As of August, 19 American soldiers had been killed, and hundreds injured, many in strikes on these bases.

The UAE said Iran launched ballistic missiles, Iran denied

On Tuesday, the UAE warned residents of incoming ballistic missiles, later determined to have been launched by Iran. Neither struck the Gulf nation, and Iran's Foreign Ministry later rejected the report, instead suggesting that a "false-flag" attack by the US or Israel may have been behind the action.
 
Today’s Tousi report is both interesting and amusing. First thing of importance is the old saying,

“The enemy of my enemy is my friend.”

It seems the Iraqi Kurds want to take over Iraq, with help from the IRGC and those stolen American weapons. Story has it that the IRGC is getting ready for a ground invasion of Iraq to help them and eliminate American bases.

Part two. Get ready to giggle. Tousi showed a clip from Iranian TV, where they are having a national fund raiser to reward the one who kills Trump. So far they have collected 81 million tomans. They want to get it up to at least 100 million. With the current state of the Iranian economy that 81 mill. translates to less than $1,000. They can’t even get their people to send money to kill Trump.

It was also reported that a leaked recording of a high level Basij meeting that the gov. is terrified of the next uprising. They aren’t sure if the storm troopers can put it down again. Largely because the Immortal Guard have lifted a page from the IRGC/Basij playbook. They are using old news footage to dox the Basij.

Still watching, will add more if needed.

EDIT TO ADD/CORRECT: I’m not good at currency conversion. I now believe that 81 mill. actually works out to less than $500.

(Snicker, snicker, giggle, giggle.)
 
Last edited:
ETA: If correct, these fools really want to get that guy out of the bottom of that well.....


Posted for fair use.....

Iran threatens US bases in Europe if war resumes​

Sources close to Tehran tell the Financial Times Iran considering strikes on US assets in southeastern Europe, targeting undersea cables, if war renews.​

Israel National News
Aug 19, 2026, 9:21 AM (GMT+3)

Iran may attack US military targets in Europe if the US renews the war, the Financial Times reported, quoting people close to the Iranian regime.

Two IRGC insiders told the Financial Times that Iranian forces have weighed strikes on US assets in southeastern Europe, such as Bulgaria and Cyprus. They also said that Iran has examined attacking submarine fiber-optic cables in the Strait of Hormuz if tensions escalate.

Royal United Services Institute research fellow Sidharth Kaushal told the Times that Iran's newest threat is "real, but limited," adding that the IRGC could deploy medium-range ballistic missiles against US assets in southeastern Europe, but would have a hard time causing damage at longer range, since if heavier-duty missiles were used, the payload would need to be reduced.

The second insider warned that Iran would have "no limits" if the US renewed the war; the first said that the attack on a US base in Jordan, which killed three US service members, was a "message to Europe."

He also said that Iran is trying to emphasize that anyone who cannot reach agreements with Iran's Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf will need to deal with Supreme National Security Council Secretary Mohsen Rezaei instead.

Related articles:
Ghalibaf, who is also a senior negotiator, accused Washington on Tuesday of escalating pressure on Tehran in an attempt to extract concessions that were not included in the Islamabad memorandum of understanding (MoU).

“Americans think squeezing Iran harder will win concessions that were never part of the agreement," Ghalibaf wrote on social media.

“Bessent and Hegseth are way out of their league," he added, referring to US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth.

“Stop waiting for the clown crew to pull a rabbit out of their hat and clean up the mess you made."

Separately, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei rejected reports of indirect, undisclosed contacts between the United States and the IRGC through representatives in Iraqi Kurdistan. He also denied reports of a secret US-Iran meeting in Erbil.

Baghaei described such reports as "media techniques and psychological operations used to sow discord among Iran's decision-making bodies."

Also on Tuesday, US President Donald Trump said that there are currently no negotiations being conducted with Iran and that no talks are scheduled.

"There are no talks or conversations going on, or scheduled, with the Islamic Republic of Iran. The Naval Blockade remains in full force and effect. The Hormuz Strait is open and operating. All water mines have been removed or detonated. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP," the President wrote on his Truth Social platform.

Trump stated earlier this week during a Fox News appearance that a secret channel for peace discussions between Washington and the IRGC was active.

Later, Trump stated that he does not intend to seek an extension of the June framework agreement negotiated with Iran to resolve the conflict, while asserting that American forces have established "total control" over the Strait of Hormuz.
 
Last edited:

Pentagon weighing smaller U.S. military presence in Gulf once Iran war ends​

An analysis, which the Defense Department said was not yet a formal review, will help address whether to rebuild strike-battered bases, said people familiar with the matter.

August 18, 2026 at 11:11 a.m. EDTYesterday at 11:11 a.m. EDT


By Noah Robertson
,
John Hudson
and
Susannah George

The Pentagon is evaluating its military footprint in the Middle East in an early sign of the Iran war’s potential to transform the U.S. presence in the region, according to eight people, including officials and others familiar with the matter.

One of the key areas the Defense Department is assessing is whether to pull back troops from the Persian Gulf, where America’s large overseas military bases have been battered by months of Iranian strikes, two people familiar with the ongoing analysis said.

The damage to these facilities has prompted a once-in-a-generation chance for the Pentagon to reconsider its presence in the region. The Defense Department has already signaled that it might not rebuild its bases as they were before the conflict.
2300-military-bases.jpg

The evaluation is being led by the Pentagon’s policy office, though a senior Pentagon official, who like others spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive analysis, said that the Joint Staff and U.S. Central Command were also studying the issue.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had not yet ordered a formal review of U.S. posture in the region, the official said. Instead, the official cast the analysis as “prudent planning” that could eventually inform how the administration addresses whether to rebuild the bases damaged during the war.

“Decisions are going to have to be made on some of this stuff,” the official said.
U.S. Central Command, which runs U.S. military operations in the Middle East, normally stations about 40,000 troops across almost 20 sites in a 1,500-mile arc from Jordan to Oman.
Since early this year, the military has surged warships, fighters, air defense assets and other scarce military equipment to the region to defend U.S. forces and carry out more than 13,000 strikes against Iran.

America’s largest and most permanent bases in the Middle East are in the Persian Gulf, where Bahrain hosts the headquarters of the U.S. Fifth Fleet and where other states, such as Kuwait, house Army and Air Force assets.
Allies in the Gulf have for decades depended on U.S. forces for their defense. Any regional drawdown could leave states unable to defend themselves against Iranian attacks. Investing in domestic capabilities or partnering with other powers to offset the shortfall could take months to years.

People familiar with the Pentagon’s analysis said the issue is likely to intensify a debate between camps within the administration that support military interventions and others that have argued the Pentagon should curtail some of its security commitments to refocus on defending the U.S. homeland or deterring more powerful adversaries, like China.

The discussions have also involved Adm. Bradley Cooper, the head of U.S. Central Command, who supports deliberations about potentially moving U.S. troops west from the Persian Gulf, said a U.S. official.
A spokesperson for U.S. Central Command declined to comment.

Before the start of the war in February, U.S. Central Command evacuated many of its bases, judging them too vulnerable to Iranian missile and drone attacks to maintain normal staffing levels. Some of the shifts away from the major Gulf facilities might last after the war, a person familiar with the posture adjustments said.

“Iran thinks we are in the traditional places,” the person said, declining to specify the changes so as not to put U.S. service members at risk. “And we are not.”

Six U.S. service members were killed in a March strike on Port Shuaiba, a military facility in Kuwait, and more than 200 U.S. facilities have been damaged or destroyed during the conflict, The Washington Post reported in May.
While defending its personnel in the region, the U.S. military has also expended more than 1,000 sophisticated air-defense interceptors, draining the Pentagon’s stockpile of Patriot and Terminal High Altitude Area Defense missiles, The Post reported in March.

“The war really did highlight the vulnerability ... of U.S. forces in the region,” said Michael Ratney, a former diplomat who served as the U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia and the deputy chief of mission in Qatar.

Moving troops and equipment further west to Jordan, Israel or the Red Sea coast of Saudi Arabia could help alleviate some of the pressure, he argued, while noting the added distance wasn’t a “perfect solution to this problem.”

Iran has already demonstrated it can strike faraway targets in Jordan and Israel. Last month an Iranian attack on Jordan killed four U.S. service members.

Tehran’s retaliatory attacks against bases in the Persian Gulf plunged the region into crisis and are stoking frustration among core U.S. allies there, who feel they were not properly consulted by the Trump administration before starting the war.

Allison Minor, who served during the first Trump administration as the director for Arabian Peninsula affairs on the National Security Council, said the Gulf countries could maintain elements of their security partnership with the U.S. — such as arms sales and intelligence sharing — while hosting a smaller troop presence.

“But you need to be discussing all of those comprehensively and not just the question of the sheer number of troops,” she said.
The Pentagon has publicly estimated that the war’s cost will reach about $37.5 billion by the end of September, but that price tag does not account for the money it will take to rebuild bases in the region.

Jules Hurst III, the Defense Department’s comptroller, told the Senate in May that the reconstruction costs were being left out because the administration has not yet decided how it wants to rebuild from the damage.

In April, the center-right American Enterprise Institute estimated it would cost $5 billion to repair the U.S. bases that have been targeted.
Multiple people familiar with the Pentagon’s analysis cautioned that any permanent changes to U.S. posture were still distant and would require the approval of senior administration officials.

In June, President Donald Trump signed a preliminary peace deal with Tehran and signaled that the war was coming to a close. The agreement later collapsed, and the two sides have sporadically exchanged strikes in the months since.

A recent policy proposal from Defense Priorities, a think tank that advocates for military restraint, calls for closing U.S. bases in close striking range of Iran’s missiles and drones, such as Kuwait. The proposal also calls for moving forces dispersed in the United Arab Emirates, Jordan and Bahrain to more secure facilities such as the Prince Sultan Air Base near Riyadh.

More hawkish voices in Washington have sought to influence the Pentagon’s planningby proposing the movement of U.S. troops in the region to Israel. A report by the pro-Israel group Jewish Institute for National Security of America in March called for more U.S. military assets to be moved to Israel’s Ovda Airbase.
This winter, in the run-up to Operation Epic Fury, Washington sent F-22 Raptor fighter jets to the base in a sign of deepening U.S.-Israel military relations.

There is disagreement within the Trump administration over that recommendation given concerns that an expanded U.S. presence there could pose a counterintelligence vulnerability amid the Pentagon’s growing concern about Israeli espionage.

Also, the office of Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby has launched a public review of America’s military presence in NATO, after the Trump administration announced it was pulling thousands of troops out of Germany and Poland. The study is set to conclude in December.

Tara Copp contributed to this report

 
Open Source Intel @Osint613
BREAKING

U.S. President Donald Trump: "No one has given the Islamic Republic of Iran a greater opportunity to make a Deal than me. TRAGICALLY, for them, they have failed to take it. Therefore, today, I am announcing the MOST CRUSHING ECONOMIC OPERATION EVER TAKEN AGAINST ANY COUNTRY! This will be Economic Warfare and Isolation on an unprecedented scale. Their navy is gone, their air force is destroyed, their military factories are now rubble, their currency is worthless, and their country is hanging by a thread. Today, I am also announcing that ANY country that allows its financial institutions, businesses, airports, or government entities to provide any type of lifeline to Iran will itself face TREMENDOUS Economic Consequences. Oil smuggling, swap lines, cash transfers, exchange houses, ship registries, front companies — It all needs to stop NOW. You know who you are. This will be an ECONOMIC D-DAY, and we need all of our Allies to stand with the United States of America to isolate, and defeat, the Iran threat. These maniacs are on the ropes, and these HISTORIC MEASURES will cripple them and their ability to project terror worldwide. IRAN WILL NEVER HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER. President DONALD J. TRUMP".
 

LARRY & PEPE:Trump Tried to Buy Iran's Revolutionary Guard IRAN REJECTS TRUMP'S BILLIONS IN BRIBES​

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Vr7QVauo5A

Run time - 39:39
Aug 19, 2026
Trump's White House tried to buy off Iran's Revolutionary Guard with a multi-billion-dollar offer modeled on the Venezuela playbook — and got refused twice, first by IRGC commander Vahidi, who called it treason, and then by Pakistan's Army Chief Asim Munir, who told Trump directly that Islamabad would not help destabilize Tehran's leadership. In this episode, Zulfiqar Ali, Pepe Escobar, and Larry Johnson break down the failed bribery attempt,

China's directive to Pakistan to prioritize its Iran relationship, and why the collapse of the US–Iran memorandum of understanding is now pushing Washington toward open discussion of a nuclear strike on Iran.

The panel also covers the global diesel and aviation-fuel shortage triggered by the Strait of Hormuz blockade, the UAE's public cutoff of trade with Iran days after reportedly sending Tehran billions in cash and gold, and why Oman and Qatar are now openly rejecting US pressure over who controls the strait.

This episode is built on direct reporting from sources inside Tehran and Islamabad and lands the same week the US–Iran MOU formally expired (August 17–18, 2026), with Iran declaring a shift to a fully offensive posture on Hormuz.

Zulfiqar Ali reports with direct access to decision-making circles in Islamabad and Tehran; Pepe Escobar is a veteran geopolitical analyst covering Eurasia and the multipolar order from the ground; Larry Johnson is a former US intelligence and State Department official providing military and strategic analysis.

Transition Protocol is a serious, source-driven geopolitical and economic analysis channel focused on evidence-based reporting and high-signal breakdowns of global power shifts and their financial consequences.
 
A CLARIFICATION on my last post about the Iranian ‘Let’s kill Trump’ fund raiser. I did say I’m bad at currency conversion. So I asked Mrs. late. She tells me at the current exchange rate, one U.S. dollar gets you about 180,000 tomans. Doing quick and dirty math that means if they massively exceed their stated goal of 100 million and reach 180 million, whoever manages to assassinate Pres. Trump will be rewarded with a whopping $1,000. And again from personal knowledge that amount won’t even buy a round trip ticket.

(giggle)
 
Last edited:
Missed this update couple days back..... so much fog....
The attack came a day after a report at Axios noted that KRG President Nechirvan Barzani had been tapped by the US as a possible backchannel in diplomacy with Iran. Nechirvan and Masrour are related, and both come from the Barzani family that runs the KDP party, the largest Kurdish party in Iraq.

The role of Nechirvan was later confirmed in a second report at Iran International.

Iran's drone strike on Kurds may be warning over Trump administration's backchannel, analyst says​

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi dismissed the drone attack on the office of the Kurdistan Democratic Party leader, posting on X/Twitter on Monday that “Kurdish friends” should be aware of “false-flag ploys” aimed at “sowing discord between neighbors.”

Two drones targeted the office of Masrour Barzani, the Kurdistan Regional Government’s (KRG) prime minister, and the home of the region’s intelligence chief in northern Iraq on Monday, the KRG security agency announced.

The attack was launched from Iranian territory, it said in a statement

“Nothing justifies the reckless attack on PM Barzani’s office. Kurdish friends should be vigilant against false-flag ploys to sow discord between neighbors,” Araghchi wrote. “We protected our Kurdish friends against Saddam [Hussein] and Daesh (ISIS), and we’re thankful for the security they’ve provided on our border.”

View: http://twitter.com/araghchi/status/2089420870217322578


Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei doubled down on Araghchi’s statements in comments to Iranian state media on Monday, describing the attack as “highly suspicious.”

“This development is highly suspicious and requires all sides to exercise vigilance,” he told IRNA, adding that he had information indicating that Iraqi intelligence was holding groups responsible for planning and carrying out the “sinister plots.”

Security analyst accuses Iran's response of being incomplete

Security analyst Roger Macmillan said that the response by the Iranian officials was lacking.

“The Kurdistan Counter-Terrorism Service didn’t just say ‘Iran did this.’ They named the munition type, two Hadid-110 drones, and stated a launch origin inside Iranian territory,” he explained.

“That’s a forensic claim, not a political one. A false-flag narrative needs to explain how a third party sourced and launched an Iranian-designated drone type from inside Iran’s own territory. Araghchi’s statement doesn’t engage with that detail at all; it simply asserts the incident is ‘suspicious’ and pivots to blaming unnamed others.”

The attack came after a report from Axios published on Sunday claimed that the Trump administration used Iraqi Kurdistan President Nechirvan Barzani as a back channel to speak with the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Commander Ahmad Vahidi. A spokesperson later confirmed the report to Iran International.

Macmillan said that the fact that the strike came within days of the confirmation indicated that the motive behind the attack was to punish KRG and warn its leadership against making further admissions going forward.

IRGC attacks Kurdish territories, 'Post' confirms

Erbil has seen frequent attacks from Iran since the outbreak of the war. A Democratic Party of Iranian Kurdistan (PDKI) report seen by The Jerusalem Post claimed that between February 28 and August 1, the IRGC and affiliated groups were responsible for 423 attacks on five Kurdish organizations in the territory, resulting in 20 casualties. The Post has also previously spoken with Ardalan Mama, whose home was destroyed by an Iranian missile.

Since the outbreak of the war, Araghchi has frequently commented on the risk of alleged false-flag attacks. In March, he warned his Turkish counterpart of repeated false-flag operations aimed at undermining regional ties a day after NATO intercepted a ballistic missile fired from Iran over Turkey, and only weeks ago he described a drone strike on Egypt’s Damietta Port as an Israeli false-flag operation.

View: http://twitter.com/araghchi/status/2082917797290725452

“Egypt is considered a friend and important partner in the region, and its security constitutes an utmost priority for us. We must all remain vigilant toward Israeli schemes and “false flag” operations that aim to undermine regional peace,” he wrote. “The threat is clear, shared, and fears Muslim solidarity.”

Scoop: Inside Trump's secret backchannel to Iran's Revolutionary Guard​

In mid-May, U.S. negotiators trying to reach a deal with Iran to end the war ran into a problem: They couldn't tell if the people across the table actually spoke for the country's powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).
  • So Trump administration officials did something unconventional — they went around Iran's negotiators and reached out directly to IRGC leadership. The person they tapped for the backchannel was Nechirvan Barzani, the president of the Kurdistan region in Iraq, who had something very few others do: the trust of both U.S. and IRGC leaders.
Why it matters: The episode, which was detailed by three sources with direct knowledge and has not been previously reported, shows how tricky it's been for the U.S. to negotiate with a country where Washington isn't sure who exactly is in charge. The U.S. and Iran did reach a memorandum of understanding, but it quickly collapsed.
  • The Trump administration's key problem today and in any future negotiation will be to make sure it's talking to the people who are actually calling the shots. That also means finding mediators who are trusted by both the White House and the Iranian regime.
The big picture: The war upended Iran's leadership. The assassination of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and other senior political leaders — and the 40 days of fighting that followed — dramatically strengthened the IRGC's grip on the levers of power, including national security and foreign policy decision-making.
  • Uncertainty surrounding new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei's condition during the first few weeks of the war and his absence from public view further strengthened IRGC commanders.
Flashback: After an April 8 ceasefire and a summit in Islamabad days later, the U.S. and Iran tried to negotiate an end to the war.
  • In early May, the White House felt it was closing in on a deal, but Iran delayed its response for more than 10 days.
  • White House negotiators started to think that Iranian negotiators — Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi — were not empowered to cut a deal and were being overruled by the IRGC.
Driving the news: The White House realized it needed a backchannel to IRGC leadership.
  • Around May 10, then-Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard called Barzani.
  • According to two sources with direct knowledge of the call, Gabbard told Barzani that the administration thought he could help get in touch with the commander of the IRGC, Gen. Ahmad Vahidi.
  • During the Iran-Iraq war, Barzani lived in Iran and studied at the University of Tehran. He is fluent in Farsi and has personal relationships with many senior members of the Iranian regime, including top members of the IRGC, according to one of the sources.
  • "Nechirvan Barzani is a pragmatic problem solver. He's respected across the region. He knows nearly everyone in Tehran as well as Washington. That's who you call in a pinch," Brett McGurk, who has served as a Middle East adviser to four presidents, said in an interview.
  • The source said Gabbard made clear to Barzani that she was making the call with the approval of President Trump and Vice President Vance.
  • Gabbard told Barzani the White House wanted to know if Vahidi and the IRGC leadership were on board with what Ghalibaf and Araghchi had been negotiating or whether they had other ideas or demands, the source said.
  • Gabbard noted the mediators couldn't reach Vahidi to clarify that.
Behind the scenes: Barzani agreed to Gabbard's request. He reached out to his contacts at the IRGC and said he had a message from the Trump administration.

  • "But I want to talk directly to Gen. Vahidi," Barzani stressed, according to one of the sources.
  • The Iranians agreed. On May 14, an IRGC official arrived in Barzani's office in Erbil, the capital of Iraqi Kurdistan, carrying an encrypted phone to conduct a secure call.
  • Barzani asked Vahidi if he was aligned with the Iranian negotiators. The Iranian general said he was. "I fully support them and this is also the position of the IRGC. We prefer to solve this crisis through negotiations," Vahidi said, according to a source with direct knowledge.
  • Three sources, including a White House official, said Barzani called Gabbard right after his conversation with Vahidi and briefed her on the Iranian response. Gabbard then briefed the White House.
The intrigue: After receiving the Iranian response, the Trump administration came back with another proposal, according to one of the sources with knowledge of the backchannel talks.
  • The U.S. wanted Barzani to host secret talks between senior U.S. and Iranian negotiators in Erbil.
  • Barzani spoke to the Iranians again and passed on the message. The Iranians didn't rule it out, but were concerned about their security, the source said.
  • They believed Israeli intelligence had many assets in Iraqi Kurdistan and were concerned the Israelis would try to assassinate them in Erbil or while they traveled there and back.
  • The Erbil meeting never materialized.
State of play: The Pakistani and Qatari mediators continue to exchange messages between the U.S. and Iran but without any significant progress, regional sources with knowledge of the matter said.
  • Some of those sources believe the Pakistanis are giving more optimistic readouts than the talks justify in an effort to create a sense of momentum that could break the stalemate.
What to watch: Barzani has recently sent messages to the White House offering to help restart U.S.-Iran negotiations, according to a source with knowledge of the matter.
  • McGurk said the issue is not the mediator. "It's Iran's policy on the Strait," he said, "and that's unlikely to change anytime soon."
  • email (opens in new window)
  • sms (opens in new window)
  • facebook (opens in new window)
    twitter (opens in new window)
    linkedin (opens in new window)
    bluesky (opens in new window)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Followed by the classic immediate denial from Iran for whatever that's worth...

Iran Denies Report of ‘Backchannel’ Negotiations with U.S.​

Iran’s Foreign Ministry on Monday dismissed “fabricated” reports in American media of secret “backchannel” negotiations between the U.S. government and Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).

The report on backchannel communications, published by Axios on Sunday, said that former Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard set up the line of communications in May, using the president of Iraqi Kurdistan, Nechirvan Barzani, as a go-between.

According to the report, Barzani used his ties with the IRGC to get in touch with its leader, Gen. Ahmad Vahidi. Vahidi said he supported the work of Iran’s negotiators, including Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf.

Barzani relayed the message back to Gabbard, providing important information at a time when many observers thought the IRGC was working to sabotage negotiations. It was also unclear at the time whether Aragchi, or any other representative of Iran’s secular government, had any real power to make an agreement with the United States.

The report said the Trump administration wanted to open this channel of communication wider, developing Barzani into an intermediary, and possibly even arranging direct talks between American and Iranian representatives in Erbil, the capital of Iraqi Kurdistan. The Iranians allegedly balked at this proposal, in part because they feared Israel might try to assassinate any representatives they sent to Erbil.

The alleged “backchannel” seems to have closed over the past two months. Gabbard resigned as DNI at the end of June to help her husband battle an “extremely rare” form of cancer. All negotiations with Iran collapsed after the Iranians violated the June Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) by attacking ships in the Strait of Hormuz. The Iranians claim the U.S. violated the MOU by responding to its attacks.

As of Monday, the Iranians claim their only negotiations are bilateral talks with Oman over controlling the Strait of Hormuz and extorting “fees” from ships that pass through it. President Donald Trump said he is content to let pressure from the U.S. blockade build up against Iran and threatened to use force against Oman — a longstanding U.S. regional ally — if it makes a deal with Iran to control Hormuz.

One of Axios’ sources said Barzani told the White House that he could use his IRGC connections in an effort to restart negotiations between the U.S. and Iran.

A spokesperson for Barzani substantially confirmed the Axios report to Iran International on Sunday, pointing to Iraqi Kurdistan’s good diplomatic relations with countries across the Middle East, and Barzani’s personal connections to IRGC leaders developed when he studied political science at the University of Tehran in the 1980s.

“The Kurdistan Region of Iraq, before the war, during the war, and afterward, has consistently emphasized that dialogue and negotiations are the only way to resolve existing disputes and tensions,” Barzani’s spokesperson said.

Another source within the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) told Iran International that Barzani “had been asked to play the role because of his good relations with both the United States and Iran.” However, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baqaei said on Monday the Axios report was false, and concocting it was a sign of “desperation” by the United States.

“News of a secret meeting between Iran and the U.S. in Erbil is totally fabricated. The other news report is a media trick and psychological warfare aimed at creating division among decision-making bodies in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Baqaei said.

 

Iran threatens to strike US bases in Europe if Trump escalates war: report​

Published Aug. 19, 2026, 3:45 p.m. ET

Iran is considering attacking US military targets in Europe should President Trump escalate the war, according to people close to the regime.

Among the targets selected for possible attack was the Bezmer Air Base in Bulgaria, which was approved for the use of US refueling aircraft last month, insiders told the Financial Times.

Iran was also reportedly weighing attacks on the British Royal Air Base in Cyprus, which was struck by a drone last March during the first wave of fighting.

ran’s missiles have proven to be able to reach targets outside the region, but their strength and accuracy remain low.SEPAHNEWS.COM/AFP via Getty Images

Iran could target several US military outposts in southern Europe with its medium-range ballistic missiles, but analysts have said the rockets would struggle with accuracy and power at longer distances.

Along with the air bases, Iran’s military has also considered sabotaging Europe’s underwater fiber-optic cables, which have come under attack in recent years.

“Should the US go too far, Iran will defend itself at any price, go beyond the region and hit Europe, too,” one of the people close to the regime said of the current plans.

Fears of renewed fighting in the region were stoked after the US and Iran failed to extend a 60-day cease-fire agreement, which expired on Monday, with both sides refusing to restart peace negotiations.

Iran has repeatedly threatened to extend the war beyond the Middle East, with Tehran warning the UK to keep the US military out of its air bases.

“Any base that is used to launch an attack on Iranian territory will be considered a legitimate target,” the regime said in a statement last month.

Iran has previously proved its willingness to attack distant targets during the war, with the Islamic republic firing multiple missiles extending well beyond its known reach — albeit with mixed results.

Following the initial US-Israeli bombings in late February, Tehran fired missiles at the Diego Garcia US-UK joint military base in the Indian Ocean nearly 2,500 miles away, none of which reached the target.

Iran, however, did land a hit on the UK’s air base in Akrotiri, Cyprus, located some 1,000 miles away.

 

Bessent says US will impose toughest ever sanctions on Iran, urges China to cooperate​

Aug 20 (Reuters) - The United States will impose "the toughest sanctions in history" on Iran, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Thursday as he urged Beijing to cooperate with Washington.

Bessent said he would hold a press conference ‌on Monday to discuss details.
The Reuters Iran Briefing newsletter keeps you informed with the latest developments and analysis of the Iran war. Sign up here.

"It is a one-two punch. We have the blockade (on Iran), and we are going to have the toughest sanctions in history," Bessent told CNBC. "It is going to work in Iran and we are going to collapse this regime."

"It is time for our allies and the rest of the world to make a decision," he said.

President Donald Trump ⁠warned on Wednesday of economic consequences against any country that provided "any type of lifeline to Iran" as the United States looks to resolve a war it began alongside Israel nearly six months ago.

"I think oil markets are misinterpreting what this economic pressure means," Bessent said. Oil prices climbed to more than three-week highs on Thursday.

"We have asymmetric information, and I'm not sure why oil has popped up on this," Bessent said. "If we are doing the maximum economic pressure, then that means that likely there will not be a large-scale kinetic restart."

When asked if the United States could target China ‌for doing ⁠business with Iran, Bessent said many conversations were best to have in private.

"We are confident that everyone wants the Strait (of Hormuz) reopened, and for energy prices to come back down," he said. "Keep in mind that the Chinese get 50% (of their) energy from inside the Gulf. So it would do them a big service ⁠to get with the program."

China's embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Bessent's remarks.

China buys more than 80% of Iran's shipped oil, according to 2025 data from analytics firm Kpler. ⁠If the U.S. engaged in further economic warfare with China, a major exporter to the U.S., including vital rare-earth minerals, it would risk retaliation.
Iran has weathered punishing economic sanctions for nearly 50 ⁠years, since the Islamic Revolution of 1979.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi called Trump's comments an attempt to divert American public opinion from domestic financial problems, including record debt and rising interest rates.

 

Iran shifts to ‘survival economy’ as US vows to ‘collapse the regime’​

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Thursday that the Trump administration’s new economic campaign against Iran is ultimately intended to bring down the Islamic Republic, as Washington prepares what it says will be an unprecedented new round of sanctions alongside its naval blockade.

Bessent said the measures would be detailed at a news conference Monday and described the strategy as a combination of the blockade and what he called the toughest sanctions ever imposed on a country. “It is going to work in Iran and we are going to collapse this regime,” Bessent told CNBC.

The declaration is significant because President Donald Trump himself has not explicitly said regime collapse is the objective, leaving unclear whether Bessent’s unusually blunt wording represents formal administration policy or his own description of the expected outcome.

Trump on Wednesday announced what he called an “ECONOMIC D-DAY,” promising economic warfare and isolation against Iran on an unprecedented scale and threatening consequences for countries, companies and institutions that continue providing Tehran with an economic lifeline.

The new campaign is expected to target not only Iran but third countries that continue trading with it, including through oil purchases, financial transfers and sanctions-evasion networks.

Bessent said it was time for U.S. allies and other countries to decide whether they would cooperate with Washington’s campaign. He indicated that the Treasury Department and wider U.S. government would use their enforcement powers against entities that continue enabling Iranian trade.

The strategy effectively puts governments and businesses around the world on notice that maintaining commercial links with Tehran could expose them to U.S. economic penalties.

One of the biggest unresolved questions is China. Beijing remains Iran’s most important oil customer, purchasing more than 80% of Iran’s seaborne crude in 2025, according to Kpler data cited by Reuters. But when Bessent was asked whether Washington would also punish China for continuing to do business with Tehran, he declined to give a direct answer, saying some conversations were better conducted privately.

He nevertheless pointed to Beijing’s dependence on Persian Gulf energy supplies, arguing that China has a strong interest in helping restore normal traffic through the Strait of Hormuz. “Keep in mind that the Chinese get 50% of their energy from inside the Gulf,” Bessent said, adding that cooperation with Washington would therefore serve Beijing’s own interests.

The dilemma is considerable. Punishing Chinese trade with Iran could intensify pressure on Tehran, but it could also reopen economic confrontation between Washington and Beijing after Trump reached agreements that had eased previous trade tensions.

The economic campaign comes as China maintains close strategic ties with Iran, with reports in recent weeks also raising questions over possible military assistance to Tehran.

Despite Washington’s rhetoric, many analysts doubt that even a combination of a naval blockade and severe secondary sanctions can quickly force Iran’s economy, or its political system, to collapse.

Iran has endured extensive U.S. sanctions for decades and entered the latest conflict already suffering from deep structural economic problems. The International Monetary Fund expects Iran’s economy to contract by 5.4% this year. The Wall Street Journal reported that annual inflation is now running above 80%, while shortages and rapidly rising prices are eroding living standards.

Iran’s oil revenues have also been hit particularly hard. According to Capital Economics data cited by the Journal, Iranian oil exports fell from about $4.5 billion in June to close to zero in July after the U.S. reimposed its blockade. The pressure is severe. But economic pain does not necessarily translate into political capitulation. Instead, Iran is increasingly reorganizing its economy around endurance rather than recovery.

According to the Wall Street Journal report, officials in mediating countries also “warned their American counterparts that Iran has lived under sanctions for years, and that betting on Tehran compromising because of economic pressure is unlikely to produce results.” Instead, they said Iran is expected to escalate its attacks in order to raise the cost for Washington and its allies.

Iranian officials have already warned this week that if the blockade is not lifted within “weeks,” Tehran will trigger renewed regional escalation. And if Iran can survive longer than Washington expects, the Journal wrote, it will have even less incentive to give up the leverage it derives from threatening the movement of ships and tankers through the Strait of Hormuz, “prolonging the deadlock and the risk of renewed fighting.”

Hadi Kahalzadeh, a research fellow at the U.S.-based Quincy Institute and a former official in Iran’s Social Security Organization, told the newspaper: “This pressure will gradually move Iran from a resilient economy that absorbs shocks to a survival economy that continues to function but steadily loses its ability to recover.” At the same time, he said, “repression and the structure of the state make it difficult for that pain to translate into pressure strong enough to change national security decisions.”

The Iranian regime, meanwhile, continues to issue defiant and combative messages. The Foreign Ministry in Tehran said: “The U.S. economic sanctions against Iran, which have targeted the basic human rights of every citizen, are an example of economic terrorism and a crime against humanity.”

It added: “Sanctions and economic pressure are the other side of the coin of war and military aggression. While condemning the U.S. action, the Foreign Ministry emphasizes that Iran is steadfast and determined when it comes to defending its security and national interests and confronting military, economic, political and psychological attacks and pressures. Iran will use all means and capabilities to repel the Zionist-American enemy and defend its national interests.”
Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said: “They claim Iran is facing collapse, and yet they are begging for help from all their allies. The problem lies in miscalculations. Military warfare failed. Now they have given the next failure the name economic warfare.”

Iranian Deputy Parliament Speaker Hamid-Reza Haji Babaei added: “State institutions are working around the clock to plan and manage an all-out war on two fronts: economic and cultural.”

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi also wrote on X: “The so-called ‘Economic D-Day’ is a distraction from America’s own crisis: unprecedented debt and soaring interest costs. Doubling down on failed policies will only bring another defeat, and hostility from Iranians. U.S. economic terrorism threatens the global economy and sovereignty around the world.”

Despite the Iranian responses and the effort to project “resilience,” the growing economic pressure on Iran is clearly taking a toll. President Masoud Pezeshkian has repeatedly warned about the consequences, although it is unclear how much real power he holds in the current regime, where hard-line Revolutionary Guard generals wield significantly more influence than before.

Pezeshkian has repeatedly said that Iran must end the current situation of “neither war nor peace.” Iranian media reported in late July that he met Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei and discussed citizens’ livelihoods, foreign currency management and the energy sector.

But he, too, is of course not speaking about the possibility of surrender. His deputy, Mohammad Reza Aref, recently said: “The enemy is trying to compensate for its military defeat through economic pressure. Just as we defeated the enemy in the last two wars through cohesion and national unity, we will be able to overcome it in the economic war.”

 
Tousi was interesting tonight, as usual. First of all it seems some kind of oil facility in Tehran has had a “gas leak” explosion and it is burning. Of course at this time the cause hasn’t been proven one way or the other. Accident or sabotage is still in question. But not a bomb.

Next, he showed a clip from Iranian TV of the head of the central bank of Iran, stating that because of the American blockade, they are receiving zero oil money. He admitted on air that they are in really big trouble. Tousi is saying because of his admission he may soon become an ‘unperson’. The IRGC doesn’t like that kind of defeatist talk.

In Yemen the gov has in the last 24 to 48 hours apparently with the help of Syria, launched 181 attacks against the Houthis, killing more than 100 of them.

Finally the IRGC is in the process of cutting out the mullah’s and elected government from any and all involvement in decisions made about the running of the government and/or the war.
 
Last edited:

Vijay Prashad: Pakistan's 6 Corridors Are Keeping Iran Alive Why Won't America Sanction Pakistan?​

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1X7_A9Alk8

Run time - 52:01
Aug 21, 2026
Trump's people tried to buy an Iranian general — and were refused. In this episode, Vijay Prashad joins Zulfiqar Ali to explain why the United States cannot win, cannot exit, and cannot even discipline Pakistan, the one country keeping Iran's economy alive. Pakistan has opened at least five land corridors into Iran — six, per our reporting — carrying Chinese and other Asian goods across the border, and Washington has not sanctioned a single one of the companies involved, including military-backed firms, while continuing to sell arms to the same military.

The reason is simple: Islamabad is the last functioning channel the US has into Tehran. We also take the war's stated cause apart. The IAEA logged 440.9 kg of uranium enriched to 60% before the strikes, but there is no confirmed weapons-design programme, no nuclear test, and — as Prashad states plainly — no international "weaponization clock" of any kind.

Steve Witkoff's "11 bombs" figure was never an IAEA assessment. If the capacity was destroyed, why is the campaign still running? Because this was a regime-change war on the Iraq 2003 template, minus ground troops — and this time the government did not fall.

Meanwhile Israel, which pushed for the war in the Situation Room, has left the table entirely and Washington is holding the file alone.

Then the part that reaches your wallet: the real prize was never Iran, it was the dollar. Gulf oil priced in renminbi would shrink the eurodollar market and constrain America's ability to run limitless deficits — which is why, as Prashad notes,

Marco Rubio once admitted on television that de-dollarization would strip Washington of its instrument of punishment.

Sanctions are already dead across Afghanistan and much of Central Asia, and the hawala system is being re-institutionalized in place of SWIFT.

Vijay Prashad is a historian, journalist and director of Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research, joining from Santiago. Zulfiqar Ali reports from sources in Pakistan and Tehran. Some claims in this episode are single-source and are labelled as such on screen — we attribute rather than assert.

Transition Protocol: source-driven analysis of the shifting global order. Substack at the same name, twice weekly.
 

PEPE: TRUMP'S "MAXIMUM PRESSURE" ON IRAN JUST GOT REJECTED 440kg Missing Trump Lost His Only Window​

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-LaVbjEaA9g

Run time - 43:23
Aug 21, 2026

440.9 kilograms of 60% enriched uranium are unaccounted for — and according to sources inside the Pakistani command, the only remaining channel with visibility into where it went runs through the mediator Donald Trump has just discarded.

Pepe Escobar and Zulfiqar Ali report that Pakistan has taken a final decision: it will not close a single one of the six overland corridors keeping Iran supplied, it will not close Gwadar, and it does not regard Scott Bessent’s sanctions threats as reason to change course.

Transition Protocol can also report, for the first time anywhere, that Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar has met Wang Yi and secured a Chinese commitment to backstop Pakistan if it walks away from the $10 billion IMF programme.

Iran’s internal calculation, confirmed through two separate channels, is that it can absorb maximum pressure until November — and if provoked again, Escobar assesses Tehran may stop absorbing and go on the offensive within weeks.

Transition Protocol is a serious, source-driven geopolitical and economic analysis channel covering de-dollarization, BRICS, the multipolar order and great-power rivalry. Claims sourced to insiders are labelled as such and are not independently verified.
 

PEPE: TRUMP'S "MAXIMUM PRESSURE" ON IRAN JUST GOT REJECTED 440kg Missing Trump Lost His Only Window​

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-LaVbjEaA9g

Run time - 43:23
Aug 21, 2026

440.9 kilograms of 60% enriched uranium are unaccounted for — and according to sources inside the Pakistani command, the only remaining channel with visibility into where it went runs through the mediator Donald Trump has just discarded.

Pepe Escobar and Zulfiqar Ali report that Pakistan has taken a final decision: it will not close a single one of the six overland corridors keeping Iran supplied, it will not close Gwadar, and it does not regard Scott Bessent’s sanctions threats as reason to change course.

Transition Protocol can also report, for the first time anywhere, that Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar has met Wang Yi and secured a Chinese commitment to backstop Pakistan if it walks away from the $10 billion IMF programme.

Iran’s internal calculation, confirmed through two separate channels, is that it can absorb maximum pressure until November — and if provoked again, Escobar assesses Tehran may stop absorbing and go on the offensive within weeks.

Transition Protocol is a serious, source-driven geopolitical and economic analysis channel covering de-dollarization, BRICS, the multipolar order and great-power rivalry. Claims sourced to insiders are labelled as such and are not independently verified.
This all seems like dramatic claims. I checked on the podcasters backgrounds using both Grok and Perplexity AI; both responded with negative information (documented accusations of plagiarism, fabrications, association with Russian and Iranian state media for Pepe Escobar; no journalism or intelligence experience for Zulfiqar Ali).
 
Top