WAR Iran/ US/mideast war thread - 2/28/26 Open Hostilities (Thread for Off Topic discussion started, see post #13,751, page 344)

Exclusive: US military asks troops for ‘creative and unconventional’ ideas to punish Iran​

The request from a senior officer at the US military command carrying out President Donald Trump’s war with Iran came in an email: We need ideas.

“We are looking for new creative and unconventional ways to pressure and punish Iran,” an officer in US Central Command’s intelligence branch wrote in a message sent Wednesday to a broad group of military analysts, according to a source familiar with the message. A second source also said that a senior US military officer sent the message last week soliciting new ideas for how to deal with Iran.

The crowdsourcing-style query, which military officials said was unusual over email, is one sign of the limited — and potentially unpalatable —options available to Trump to force Iran into a deal on his terms. Hoping to find an alternative, the official at CENTCOM kicked off the brainstorming session via email to see if anyone had a better idea. The second source said CENTCOM is looking at everything, acknowledging it needs to reevaluate the strategy.

“U.S. Central Command has a long history of thinking and working in innovative ways,” Capt. Timothy Hawkins, a spokesperson for CENTCOM, said in a statement. “Admiral Cooper, in particular, reaches out to members of our great team, regardless of rank, to achieve the highest levels of operational performance possible.”

The email preceded Trump’s threat to launch new strikes against Iran, only to call them off over the weekend after regional officials — namely Saudi Arabia’s crown prince — intervened by calling the president and urging him to de-escalate.

For weeks, the US has hammered Iran with air strikes designed to degrade its ability to threaten shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and to bring Tehran back to the negotiating table, but there’s still no sign of a deal.

Trump has been weighing intensifying the military campaign, potentially by relaunching intense strikes on Iran’s remaining nuclear facilities, which he claimed had been “obliterated” in strikes last summer. Two sources familiar with the planning say the military has been actively preparing to launch strikes on Pickaxe Mountain and other Iranian sites believed to contain either nuclear material or equipment.

But even with America’s most powerful conventional weapons, those sources say, missiles and bombs alone are unlikely to achieve much because the facilities are buried deeply underground. To destroy them, the US would likely need to use ground troops — a tremendous risk that Trump has been unwilling to take — amid questions about his administration’s transparency over service member casualties. Eighteen US service members have been killed in the fighting so far.

Trump has been considering strikes akin to a “fireworks” display, another source said, which could hit either the same or similar sites as those targeted a year ago, in the hopes of a symbolic victory that would allow him to exit the war without actually accomplishing one of his initial aims: ridding Iran of its nuclear program.

And it’s unlikely that would resolve what has become the war’s central issue: Iranian claims over the Strait of Hormuz.

“At the end of the day, POTUS will want a deal, so he’ll continually look for ways to get tough and get out of this,” said one of the sources familiar with recent planning discussions.

“You need creative minds at times — especially if you’re running out of conventional options.”

Both the Central Intelligence Agency and the Defense Intelligence Agency have recently assessed that the kind of bombing the US is carrying out is unlikely to shift the Iranian negotiating position, CNN has reported.

The president’s most senior military adviser, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine, has acknowledged publicly that bombing alone is unlikely to accomplish all Trump’s previously stated objectives for the war.

“Air power has its limits,” Caine told lawmakers last month.

Options for escalating the conflict have been presented to Trump for months and debated at length, and more military assets have flowed to the region in anticipation of a go-ahead from the president. One plan conceived by CENTCOM would involve heavy bombardment over the course of one or two weeks to take out Iran’s missile capabilities, US officials said.

Trump has so far held off, in part after hearing concerns from Caine about dwindling supplies of air defense interceptors. Other officials have also raised worries about the risks of high civilian casualties if Trump followed through on threats to strike infrastructure sites like bridges and water desalination plants.

Trump could escalate by putting American boots on the ground, a threat he’s made repeatedly as he’s talked about occupying the strategic Kharg Island or removing Iran’s highly enriched uranium. But that would further break a key promise he made to his MAGA base: “I will not send you to fight and die in stupid foreign wars that never ends,” he said during a 2024 campaign rally in Pennsylvania.

Or he could accept a dangerous status quo: endless rounds of strikes and counterstrikes with Iran that are likely to cost further American lives and leave the Strait of Hormuz in a state of constant peril that could resemble the “forever wars” he has criticized.

“I think we just want to win,” Trump said during a Cabinet meeting Friday when asked about concluding the war. “We’ll be hitting them very hard, and you know, at some point, they’re going to say, ‘We just can’t take it anymore.’”

 
Rod D Martin
"You're not seeing the whole board"
@RodDMartin

Some of you are telling me the Gaza deal can't last. You're not seeing the whole board.

There are two default assumptions at work here.

The first is that Islamist radicals can just spontaneously produce missiles, guns, and money from thin air. They can't.

The second is just general black pilling, which is frankly stupid. So you're demoralized: big whoop. You'd have been more demoralized in the summer of 1940, or for that matter of 1942. And you'd have been just as wrong. Get over yourself. Look at the facts.

First, Israel beat the crap out of Hamas, one of the most bloodthirsty terrorist groups on Earth. They are as murderous with their own people as with the Israelis, and have been for decades. It is no accident that since Israel handed Gaza to the Palestinians in 2006, the Christian Arab population there has been "reduced" by 2/3. And that's not a lot different from the West Bank Palestinians, who upon gaining control of Bethlehem "reduced" its Christian population from 80% to about 10%, or the PLO and Hezbollah in Lebanon, where the Christian population was about 54% before the Civil War and is now about 37%.

The people pretending that it's the Jews who are killing Christians are willfully blind, and intentionally blinding you.

No matter what you think of Israel, Hamas is evil
. They went too far in 2023, as they were always going to do, and Israel has defeated them. They can no longer field an effective military force. They cannot resupply. They're done.

Can individual or small groups of militants kill people? Sure. But there's no longer any sanctuary, and the days of your tax money being funneled through the PA to pay for suicide bombers are long over (although if you live in Tim Walz's Minnesota, that is not true of Somalia).

The black pill types told us nine months ago that the peace would not last a week and that Trump could never pull off the deal agreed to yesterday. Yet here we are, nine months later, and he has. "Oh, it won't last," you say, but you said that last October, and the peace has held. Why? Israel cut off Hamas's ability to fight, while Trump cut off its ability to resupply. It's that simple.

Second, the reason that's simple is that Hamas's three chief patrons were Iran,
which now can't get ships in or out of its own ports, along with Turkey and Qatar. Trump has reduced Qatar to a U.S. protectorate. He's dealmaking with the Turks on F-35s and the disposition of Syria, including new oil pipelines (to be built and owned by U.S. oil companies). Turkey suddenly needs peace to achieve its own ends; Qatar simply has nowhere to go. And Hamas has no one to ship them weapons or pay their bills.

They could have made Gaza into the Riviera. Instead they dug up the water and sewer pipes to make missiles they fired for two decades at schools. So now the Board of Peace will build what they did not.

Third, they'll do that because no one hates Hamas as much as the Arabs. Every country the Palestinians have entered in any numbers, they've immediately plunged into civil war. No one wants them anywhere near anything important. Egypt's wall along its border with Gaza makes a maximum security prison look like a sand castle. It has no such wall along its Israeli border. There's a reason.

Trump has carefully cultivated enormous business and investment deals with every regional power. He's gone out of his way to give them things they need and want, from the Saudi nuclear power deal to the Turks' favorite installed in Damascus. Their interests are interlocked with ours, and tightening by the day. Everyone now profits from peace. The Palestinians are in their way.

Fourth, a massive generational shift is underway. The old timers wanted a Palestinian state, so long as it was safely contained somewhere else, and they used it to show they were "tough" against Israel when in war after war they'd been shown to be impotent. it was low cost and (moderately) higher reward for them.

Their children, exemplified by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS), are sick of it. They WANT peace with Israel. They want to make money in Israel, and they want the Israelis to bring tech and investment to them. Even more so, they want military and intelligence cooperation, which all of them badly need. They have none of their parents' sentimental attachment to long-dead Palestinian leaders or decades-old lost wars. And Trump is daily incentivizing them to double down.

Fifth, why? Because Trump knows three things the black pill guys do not:

A. Trump knows that prosperous countries rarely attack one another.
B. Trump knows Americans can make fortunes in the Middle East if peace is the rule rather than the exception, and that will never be achieved through a Bush-style occupation. He also knows that we can save fortunes if we don't have to worry about the Middle East anymore.
C. Trump knows that without money, you're done. And he knows how to cut off the cash.

No one funds Hamas now. No one funds Hezbollah now. A Lebanese peace requires a stable, functioning Lebanese government and the dismantling of Iran's proxy army on Israel's northern border -- the one that has also occupied and terrorized Lebanon for half a century.

So Trump let Israel annihilate Hamas, which has now unconditionally surrendered. He also let it beat Hezbollah into submission. On the ground, these were the two biggest obstacles to regional peace, now each shattered.

And now we have a way to give everyone what they want in both countries: a Palestinian state under new management, military and intelligence cooperation with Israel, Israeli energy exports to Egypt and Jordan (and Syria and Lebanon soon enough), and the restoration of Lebanon as "the Paris of the Middle East" as it was before the civil war.

Sixth, most people watching see these as disconnected issues. They aren't. They never were. But neither is Syria, under new management and (despite its sordid past) desperate to balance Turkish, Israeli, Saudi, and U.S. power so it can have the breathing room to avoid becoming Ankara's colony. Suddenly it has an intense interest in peace as well; just as suddenly, it is no longer an essential Russian outpost or a colony of Tehran.

And also neither is Iraq
, where pro-Iranian militias have wreaked havoc for 20 years. Those days are over. Iraq's new President is disarming the militias and arresting their leaders. The militias spent the early part of this year reinforcing the IRGC in its massacre and crackdown on the Iranian people. They're also the final obstacle to a durable peace -- and economic development, and pipeline construction, and prosperity -- in Iraq itself.

Seventh, all these roads lead one place: Iran. The Islamic regime is the primary source of funding, armament, and direction for the bad guys in every armed conflict in the region: literally all of them. Tehran used all these proxies to build a de facto Persian Empire from Baghdad to Beirut and from Abadan to Aden. That's gone now. It won't be coming back.

Eighth, the Iran war has shown the Gulf Arab states that the Iranian really is a clear and present danger, not a convenient idiocracy that keeps its country from becoming a rich regional power. Months of Iranian bombardment of Arab hotels, water plants, airports, and shipping have been more persuasive than decades of American leaders. Now Saudi Arabia carries out joint attacks on Iran with the U.S.; so do Kuwait and the UAE. And with a host of currency swap lines, nuclear power deals, and direct military support, Trump is drawing all of them closer to the U.S. by the day.

Ninth, all that works because of what doesn't. China is a nonfactor. Supposedly Iran's ally (much like it was supposedly Russia's "ally without limits" while it pushed Putin into his Ukrainian quagmire), China hasn't lifted a finger. Rumors of shoulder-fired missile shipments are just that: rumors. But if true, they're the exception that proves the rule. China is NOT sending advanced fighter jets, not at any price. China is NOT sending troops. China is NOT sending its Navy. If anything, it's sparring with the U.S. over the pending Taiwan arms sale...but only very, very gently.

No one in the Middle East is stupid enough not to understand what China calls "the Malacca Dilemma". 80% of its oil has to flow through the Strait of Malacca. The U.S. already had de facto control of the chokepoint; it has turned that into control into a chokehold with its new defense pact with the heretofore "Non-Aligned" Indonesia. It's also flipped India, which not only signed an "impossible" February trade deal with Trump (or so said the black pillers) but immediately began capturing illegal Russian Shadow Fleet oil tankers.

Iran has to use that Shadow Fleet too: 90% of its exports are to China. But China hasn't lifted a finger, and India doesn't care. That was even before Trump sealed Iran's ports tight.

Tenth, all of this has required complex negotiations with at least a dozen countries that mostly don't like each other, and all of that takes time. If you see Trump call a cease fire to "negotiate" with Iran, don't be dumb: he's actually using that time to negotiate with Saudi Arabia, and the UAE, and Oman, and Qatar, and Bahrain, and Kuwait, and Iraq, and Syria, and Lebanon, and Turkey, and Israel.
Iran is a threat to every one of them, and in many cases has been their murderous oppressor. They're skittish, they're gunshy, they know their militaries are strong on paper but weak in fact, and like all people, inertia has kept them in the long status quo. But Trump has destroyed that status quo: it is never coming back. And slowly, every country in the region is getting the point and getting on board.

How Iran finishes is almost irrelevant. Oh, you're not going to believe our expanded target package over the next few weeks. The prospect of a successful Iranian revolution and a free Iran is very, very real. A free Iran would be the greatest investment opportunity of the 2030s, and everyone would benefit, no matter how much change is tough.

But at this point it wouldn't matter. Iran spent trillions of its people's money on underground complexes in which to build nuclear weapons and the ICBMs to load them on. It has literally nothing left to show for it. And every day it threatens Hormuz or the Bab al-Mandab is other day that it's well-armed, wealthy neighbors become more determined that it can never be allowed to rise again. If the U.S. doesn't finish Iran, the Arabs will.

Trump plays the part of a chaos agent.
He does this to keep all his enemies off balance. He's been telling you this on video and in print since at least 1987. If you can't see the play, that's on you.

But no one ever does the homework. So it keeps on working for him. He's remaking the Middle East no matter what happens in Iran, and our grandchildren will thank him, not just for peace but for the prosperity that comes from it. What they won't remember is your black pill foolishness, your temporary gas price inconvenience, or your inability to see the world being transformed before your eyes.

Which is good. You want your grandchildren to respect you, after all.
 
Last edited:
Rod D Martin
"You're not seeing the whole board"
:fprt Please post the entire X post. That's just a blind link.

Summerthyme
 
Open Source Intel @Osint613
Qatar, Egypt and Turkey issued a joint statement condemning the Israeli strikes in Gaza.

"The violation of the agreement harms the implementation of the second phase. We call on the international community to exert the necessary pressure on Israel."
 
SOMEONE HIGH UP IN THE GOVERNMENT JUST LEAKED A PLANNED STRIKE ON IRAN

A major military operation was in the works.

Trump called it the largest since World War II.

Then it got leaked over the weekend.

Trey Yingst reports even senior Israeli intelligence officials had no idea the plan existed. That’s how tightly it was held… until someone high inside the U.S. government decided to run their mouth to the press.

This isn’t a minor slip.

There are 50,000 American troops, destroyers, fighters, and refuelers in the region. Operational security is everything. Leaking strike plans doesn’t just undermine negotiations — it puts American lives at risk and gives the enemy a heads-up.

Trump already pulled the strikes after requests from Iran and Gulf allies. Now the White House has to hunt down the leaker.

Whoever did this needs to be found, fired, and prosecuted.

No exceptions.

View: http://twitter.com/gunthereagleman/status/2084585169306976467?s=46&t=nGVgcONItgQOe_JoKFy5Ww

rt 2:41

When It Comes to Iran, the Trump Administration Leaks Like a Sieve

It would be one thing if, even on the rarest of occasions, we were privy to a leak from the most sensitive quarters of the U.S. military and intelligence communities that indicated something was going right for the United States. Instead, the leaks — and there have been many of them — all lean in the same direction.

One mordantly comical unauthorized leak via CNN on Monday indicated that CENTCOM’s intelligence outfit was crowdsourcing ideas for “new creative and unconventional ways to pressure and punish Iran.” At least there’s grim humor to be found in that. Most of the leaks along these lines have been far darker.

Washington Post reporter Dan Lamothe’s sources let him know that the United States lacks the naval forces necessary to defend Israel against an Iranian ballistic missile bombardment. Not to say that the Israelis required it or that the Iranians were intent on attacking Israel again (they have not, conspicuously enough, even after the April ceasefire collapsed). The point of this reportage was only to stress that the U.S. Navy “has been particularly taxed.”

The United States is critically low on defensive munitions — high-end ballistic missile interceptors, in particular. One U.S. official revealed to CBS News reporters that “the U.S. cannot sustain the rate at which it expended precision munitions early in the campaign against Iran” without “raising broader concerns about America’s readiness for a potential conflict in the Indo-Pacific.” America’s defensive munitions shortages are so grave that, according to the U.S. officials who talked to NBC News, military commanders are allowing Iranian incoming to slip through their defenses.

Not only does America not have the wherewithal to continue prosecuting the war with Iran, it never had the material capabilities necessary to wage this war in the first place.

According to the leakers, the United States did only cosmetic damage to the Iranian nuclear program over the course of Operations Midnight Hammer and Epic Fury. The Islamic Republic is already digging out its nuclear weapons facilities in places like Isfahan. Tehran’s long- and short-range ballistic missile stockpiles are largely intact. And, of course, the battle-hardened and impassive Iranian regime can withstand the economic pressures imposed on it by Trump’s blockade of Iranian ports.

It is possible that all these leaks are designed to dissuade the president from ordering the resumption of high-tempo combat operations on Iranian targets, as some suspect. They may also constitute entirely legitimate admonitions about the state of American readiness from sources with the purest of intentions. Either way, the policy these leaks should beget isn’t one of retreat but, to borrow a phrase, maximum pressure.

Iran’s missile stockpiles may be “largely” intact today. But we can say with certainty that they were 100 percent intact at the start of Operation Epic Fury. Iran’s launches dwindled to a trickle by March because U.S. forces were burying those missiles in their caches and attacking their launch vehicles. Iran may be digging out its nuclear program, but that progress can be swiftly reversed from the air. The Iranians can “outlast” the U.S. only if the U.S. has the stomach for a 90 – 120-day blockade (as the assessment published eighty-eight days ago contended). But what if the president and the public had the patience for something more sustained – a campaign augmented by periodic bouts of kinetic activity designed to rob Iran of its power projection capabilities?

The leaks are, by any objective measure, highly undesirable. Some of this information does not belong with the general public, and release of it provides the Iranian regime’s hardliners with the logical basis to resist American demands. But even if all this information is accurate, it does not logically follow that America’s only option then is a humiliating retreat.

 
Last edited:
Visegrad24 @visegrad
Syria has declared full mobilization along the Iraqi border

All soldiers on leave have been called back.

Syrian officials did not provide details, but media outlets reported that the reason is a sharp increase in Iranian militia mobilization near the Iraq-Syria border.

Damascus officially warned the Iraqi government that any drone or rocket strikes launched from Iraqi soil targeting Syria will face direct military retaliation.

Syrian authorities recently intercepted a massive covert weapons shipment hidden inside an oil tanker crossing from Iraq. The shipment contained long-range missiles and advanced drones.
 

PEPE BREAKS: DEAL CLOSED IRAN Will Charge World To Use Hormuz Now.12 Days Until FREE PASSAGE​

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kT_pextSl88

Run time - 37:19
Aug 4, 2026

Strait of Hormuz news today: Washington says a deal to reopen the strait could come within 48 hours — but the Islamabad Memorandum's free-passage clause expires on 16 August, and the arrangement replacing it is being negotiated in Muscat.

Pepe Escobar and Zulfiqar Ali on the US–Iran MOU deadline, the Iran–Oman Hormuz agreement, and who is actually writing the terms.

What Article 5 of the memorandum actually says and why the sixty-day free-passage window matters more than the headline.

The fee structure reportedly under negotiation between Tehran and Muscat, and how it collides with the freedom-of-movement framing given to markets this morning. Why crude moved today.

The Pakistan channel: Ishaq Dar's invitation to Foreign Minister Araghchi, and the reported parliamentary visit stacked against Independence Day on 14 August and the expiry of the clock on 16 August. The Saudi reversal, the weekend phone call, and the strike that did not happen.

Analysis by Pepe Escobar, geopolitical analyst and correspondent, and Zulfiqar Ali, Transition Protocol. This episode distinguishes throughout between publicly confirmed developments and single-source reporting from our own channels; both are labelled as such on screen
 
Last edited:
Visegrad24 @visegrad
Syria has declared full mobilization along the Iraqi border

All soldiers on leave have been called back.

Syrian officials did not provide details, but media outlets reported that the reason is a sharp increase in Iranian militia mobilization near the Iraq-Syria border.

Damascus officially warned the Iraqi government that any drone or rocket strikes launched from Iraqi soil targeting Syria will face direct military retaliation.

Syrian authorities recently intercepted a massive covert weapons shipment hidden inside an oil tanker crossing from Iraq. The shipment contained long-range missiles and advanced drones.
And now Israel has as well EndGameWW3 @EndGameWW3 Haaretz website: The army raises alert level in anticipation of attacks launched by Iran-aligned militias in Iraq.
 
Open Source Intel @Osint613
Israel has ordered its forces in Gaza to scale back operations after last night's targeted strike. Troops may now act only against immediate threats, and any further targeted killings require approval from the IDF Chief of Staff.

The Board of Peace has been told Israel is halting targeted assassinations, a source told the Post.
 
The Hormuz letter @Hormuz letter
BREAKING: It is now revealed that Trump has cancelled his planned massive attack on Iran on Saturday explicitly because the US military has exhausted 80% of its THAAD interceptors and 50% of Patriot interceptors, and after talking with Gulf allies who told him they were afraid of Iranian retaliation on their energy infrastructure and fear the US can't defend them anymore due to interceptor shortages, senior officials tell CNN.

Senior US military commanders warn that the Pentagon's munitions stockpile is already "dangerously low," with Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan Caine privately cautioning that carrying out the planned attack would've fully depleted interceptors available to US Central Command to absolute zero.

Sources add "the lack of interceptors means that conventional attacks can backfire if the suicide drones start making it through in-masse," warning "tit-for-tat will never end this," with ATACMS and Precision Strike Missiles primarily used up during the war and 50% of the global Tomahawk supply also depleted.
 
https://x.com/HormuzLetter
The Hormuz letter
@Hormuz letter

BREAKING: A source close to Iranian officials says Tehran has documented a pattern of oil market manipulation tied to Axios reporting and Trump administration insiders, including evidence of a $9 billion insider trading operation linked to Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff.

The documented timeline of the $9 billion insider profit:

Between April and May 2026, a series of highly suspiciously timed trades in oil futures markets preceded major Iran war and deal announcements, each tied to reporting by Axios.

On March 23, approximately $500–580 million in shorts were placed 15 minutes before Trump announced he was postponing strikes on Iran, oil dropped.

On April 7, roughly $950–960 million in shorts were placed hours before Trump announced a two-week ceasefire with Iran, oil fell 15 percent.

On April 17, approximately $760 million in shorts were placed 20 minutes before Iran's foreign minister announced the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, oil dropped.

On April 21, around $430 million in shorts were placed 15 minutes before Trump extended the ceasefire, oil dropped again.

On May 6, nearly $920 million to $1.7 billion in crude oil shorts were placed approximately 70 minutes before an Axios scoop claimed the U.S. and Iran were near a "14-point agreement." Oil dropped 12 percent. Traders made an estimated $125 million in profit, while Iran called the May 6 Axios report "the Americans' wish list," and completely false.

A senior Iranian official previously told Drop Site News that Iran privately warned VP JD Vance during Switzerland talks that Kushner and Witkoff were "abusing" negotiations, being "more interested in exploiting insider knowledge to profit in financial markets than reaching a deal."

9:09 PM · Aug 3, 2026 602.5K Views

View: https://twitter.com/HormuzLetter/status/2084386306419999104?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
 

View: http://twitter.com/Reuters/status/2084583938530377989?s=20

US has used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war, sources say​

  • Summary
  • US has used 'virtually all' PrSM and ATACM munitions, two sources say
  • US also burned through a little less than half its global Tomahawk supply, one source says
  • Some officials worry the low stockpiles will affect US readiness should another conflict break out
NEW YORK/WASHINGTON, Aug 4 (Reuters) - The U.S. Army has used up much of its global stockpile of highly accurate long-range missiles during its five-month war with Iran, according to three people familiar with the data, raising concerns about the military's readiness for future conflicts.

The missiles are principally the Army's surface-to-surface weapons, known as Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) and Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM). The U.S. ‌has used "virtually all" of these weapons, according to two of the sources.

The degree to which the military is running out of ATACMS and Precision Strike Missiles has not been previously reported.

The long-range munitions – which cost more than $1 million each – are an important part of the military's arsenal, allowing accurate strikes from a safe distance. U.S.-supplied ATACMS have played a key role in the war in Ukraine, allowing Ukrainian forces to attack targets inside Russia. The PrSM is a newer, more advanced generation that will replace the ATACMS, which have a shorter range.

The dramatic rundown in precision, long-range missiles means U.S. President Donald Trump may have to rely more on riskier, piloted bombing missions if he relaunches large-scale attacks on Iran.
The sources declined to say how many of each munition the U.S. had left.

Trump launched the Iran war jointly with Israel in February, predicting that the conflict would last a short time.

But as the war drags on, the three people familiar with the matter expressed worry that the falling missile supplies could limit the U.S. ability ⁠to deter adversaries, including Russia and China.

A fourth person familiar with the matter said that despite the high usage of precision weapons, the U.S. can resupply. Central Command — which oversees U.S. forces in the Middle East — has been able to reload from U.S. military supplies around the world, the person said.
The sources interviewed for this story spoke on the condition of anonymity.

Asked for comment on the stockpile data, the White House issued a statement from Trump, saying the U.S. had “far more munitions than anyone in the world" and "far more than we need."

"Our defense companies are, at this moment, making more munitions than they have ever made before, in addition to expanding their plants and equipment at record levels," Trump said.

Analysts agree that certain munitions, including artillery shells and several types of missiles, are being produced at record levels but caution that supplies might fall short of what is needed for a prolonged war.

Lockheed Martin, which makes the ATACMS and PrSMs, along with the anti-ballistic missile THAAD system, did not immediately respond to questions about Trump's statements or about supply levels. Raytheon, which makes Tomahawk missiles and Patriot interceptors, two important U.S. weapons, also did not immediately respond.

Responding to a request for comment, chief Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said: “America’s military is the most powerful in the world and has everything it needs to execute at the time and place of the President’s choosing. We have executed multiple successful operations across combatant commands while ensuring the U.S. military possesses a deep arsenal of capabilities to protect our people and our interests.”

The supply figures have circulated inside the federal government over the last week during tense conversations inside the Trump administration about how ‌much longer the ⁠U.S. can continue striking Iran without drawing down the stockpile to levels that would limit the military's ability to respond to crises elsewhere.

WARNINGS OVER WEAPONS SUPPLIES​

One of the sources said the drawdown of the ATACMS and PrSM stockpiles reflected a decision by the Trump administration to avoid riskier ways of attacking Iranian targets, such as by using piloted aircraft to drop bombs.

Because these weapons allow the military to attack targets from a distance, analysts say they would be valuable in a war against an adversary with strong air defenses, such as China. They have been used to strike targets inside Iran, according to a March report by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).

According to the report, PrSM stockpiles were low to start with, since it is a relatively new munition, but the U.S. military has ordered a large number of them for 2027. The Army has said that ATACMS are being phased out and ⁠that production is shifting to the newer PrSM missiles.
Military leaders have for weeks warned the president that stockpiles of defensive weapons — including Patriot interceptors, which are effective against ballistic missiles — were dwindling, said two of the sources. Last week, several media outlets reported Trump had decided not to launch another massive offensive inside Iran in part because his military advisers had warned about the U.S. stockpile.

A U.S. official disputed those accounts, saying Trump chose not to move forward with another attack because of pressure from Gulf states.

The Middle East conflict has sparked intense debate about Trump's authority to prosecute hostilities against Iran without congressional ⁠authorization. No request for a declaration of war or an authorization to use military force has been submitted to Congress.

DEFENSIVE WEAPON STOCKS ARE ALSO DIMINISHED​


Last week, CSIS published a report estimating that between February and July about 65% of Patriot interceptors had been expended and that the number of THAAD ballistic missile interceptors in U.S. stockpiles was at least 38% lower than at the start of the war. Patriots and THAADs are systems that detect and destroy incoming missiles and are among the most effective in the country's arsenal.

While Reuters has not seen the ⁠supply figures, those numbers match internal U.S. data, two of the sources said.

The U.S. also burned through a little less than half of its global supply of Tomahawk cruise missiles, which are generally launched from ships, since the start of the war, one of the sources said.

Reuters could not independently verify that number.

The Tomahawk is a Navy weapon, launched from destroyers, cruisers and submarines, and has long served as the sea service's principal means of striking heavily defended targets without risking pilots.
Raytheon, a unit of RTX (RTX.N), opens new tab, has reached a tentative multi-year agreement with the Pentagon aimed at boosting Tomahawk production, alongside increases in other munitions, as Washington races to rebuild stockpiles.

Reporting by Erin Banco, Mike Stone and Jonathan Landay; Editing by Don Durfee, Rod Nickel and Stephen Coates

 
Makes the Ukrainian strike on that ship in the Caspian Sea all the more "interesting"......

Posted for fair use......

Russia Supplied Upgraded Shahed Kamikaze Drones to Iran for Attacks on U.S. Forces.​



U.S. intelligence officials have reportedly concluded that Russia supplied Iran with upgraded Shahed loitering munitions and targeting intelligence used in attacks against U.S. military forces and strategic assets in the Middle East, according to an assessment published by the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) on August 2, 2026. If confirmed, the findings would mark a significant escalation in Moscow's military support for Tehran, strengthening Iranian long-range strike capabilities and increasing the threat to U.S. bases, deployed forces, and allied assets across the region.

The assessment suggests that Russia's role has evolved beyond supplying drone technology to providing operational enablers that improve targeting accuracy and combat effectiveness. This deeper military cooperation reflects a growing strategic alignment between Moscow and Tehran and highlights the expanding role of networked drone warfare in shaping future regional conflicts.

The assessment, citing U.S. intelligence reporting, states that Russia transferred combat-proven improvements developed during its extensive employment of Iranian-made Shahed-derived drones in Ukraine while also providing targeting intelligence to support Iranian operations. Such cooperation represents a significant evolution in the Russia–Iran defense partnership by combining upgraded loitering munitions with operational intelligence, potentially increasing the effectiveness of Iranian long-range strikes against U.S. military infrastructure and reinforcing concerns within the Pentagon and NATO over the growing integration of adversarial military capabilities.

The reported intelligence illustrates how the military relationship between Russia and Iran has evolved into a two-way exchange of technology and operational expertise. After receiving Iranian Shahed-131 and Shahed-136 loitering munitions following its invasion of Ukraine, Russia established domestic production under the Geran designation and continuously upgraded the systems using combat experience accumulated during thousands of long-range strikes against Ukrainian military infrastructure, logistics hubs, ammunition depots, command centers, and critical energy facilities.

Russian industry now manufactures two principal derivatives of the Iranian designs: the Geran-1, based on the smaller Shahed-131, and the Geran-2, derived from the larger Shahed-136. While retaining the original aerodynamic concept of a low-cost, piston-engine-powered one-way attack unmanned aerial vehicle, both versions incorporate improvements in navigation, electronic architecture, production methods, and resistance to electronic warfare, making them significantly more capable than the early Iranian-produced systems.

The Geran-1, Russia's localized derivative of the Shahed-131, is primarily intended for tactical and operational strikes against radar stations, command posts, logistics facilities, artillery positions, and air-defense systems. Open-source assessments indicate that the loitering munition carries an estimated 10- to 20-kg high-explosive fragmentation warhead, has an operational range of approximately 700 to 900 kilometers, and remains airborne for four to five hours, depending on the mission profile. Powered by a rear-mounted piston engine driving a pusher propeller, the Geran-1 cruises at approximately 150 to 180 km/h, allowing Russian forces to conduct inexpensive saturation attacks designed to overwhelm enemy air defenses through numbers rather than speed.

The larger Geran-2 has become Russia's principal long-range strike drone throughout the war in Ukraine. Measuring approximately 3.5 meters in length with a 2.5-meter delta-wing span, the unmanned aerial vehicle has an estimated launch weight of around 200 kilograms and typically carries a 40- to 50-kg high-explosive warhead, although several Ukrainian intelligence assessments suggest that newer Russian-produced variants may employ payloads approaching 90 kg, depending on the mission configuration. Open-source estimates place its operational range between 1,500 and 2,500 kilometers, while its endurance is generally assessed at eight to twelve hours, enabling deep-penetration strikes against strategic objectives. Cruising at approximately 170 to 190 km/h, the Geran-2 follows pre-programmed navigation routes before diving onto its designated target.

Compared with the original Iranian Shahed-136, current Russian-produced Geran-2 drones are believed to incorporate numerous combat-driven improvements. Analyses of recovered wreckage in Ukraine and Western technical assessments indicate modifications that include more resilient satellite navigation receivers capable of integrating GLONASS alongside GPS signals, upgraded inertial navigation systems, revised flight-control computers, improved anti-jamming antennas, redesigned electronic architecture, enhanced flight software, and manufacturing changes that simplify serial production while improving reliability. More recently recovered examples also demonstrate increased use of domestically produced Russian electronics, reducing dependence on imported components and strengthening production resilience despite international sanctions.

Combat experience has proven equally valuable as engineering improvements. After launching thousands of Geran drones during sustained strike campaigns against Ukraine, Russian forces have accumulated extensive operational data on optimal flight routes, coordinated swarm attacks, low-altitude penetration profiles, electronic warfare countermeasures, and methods for saturating layered air-defense networks. These battlefield lessons have transformed the Geran family from a localized version of an Iranian design into a combat-proven long-range strike weapon that continues to evolve through operational feedback.

According to the U.S. intelligence assessment cited by ISW, some of these Russian-developed improvements have now reportedly been transferred back to Iran. Rather than operating the original Shahed-136 configuration, Tehran is believed to have employed variants incorporating Russian modifications developed during the Ukraine conflict. If confirmed, this would represent a complete technological feedback loop in which Iranian-designed drones supplied to Russia were enhanced through extensive wartime use before being returned to Iran in a significantly more capable configuration.

Perhaps even more strategically important than the hardware itself is the reported intelligence-sharing component. According to U.S. officials, Russia may have provided targeting intelligence supporting Iranian strikes against American military installations and strategic assets throughout the Middle East. Access to satellite reconnaissance, signals intelligence, operational analysis, and detailed information regarding U.S. force dispositions could substantially improve the effectiveness of long-range drone operations without requiring major modifications to the drones themselves. For modern precision-strike operations, high-quality targeting intelligence frequently determines mission success as much as the capabilities of the weapon employed.

The reported cooperation also suggests that future Iranian drone campaigns may increasingly exploit advanced mission-planning techniques integrating satellite imagery, digital terrain mapping, electronic intelligence, and AI-assisted target analysis. AI-assisted mission planning can optimize flight paths, identify gaps in integrated air-defense coverage, recommend optimal attack timing, and improve target prioritization based on changing operational conditions. When combined with relatively inexpensive loitering munitions, such technologies can significantly increase strike effectiveness while complicating defensive planning for U.S. and allied forces.

For the Pentagon, the reported intelligence raises concerns that future Iranian drone attacks could become substantially more sophisticated than previous campaigns. Rather than relying solely on mass-produced loitering munitions, Tehran could combine upgraded drone technology with battlefield experience that Russia gained while operating against one of the world's most heavily defended air-defense environments. Such cooperation would increase the probability that future attacks achieve operational effects against U.S. bases, command centers, logistics hubs, ammunition depots, naval infrastructure, and other high-value military facilities protected by advanced air-defense systems.

The development also reflects the deepening strategic integration between Russia and Iran. What initially emerged as Iranian support for Russia's military operations in Ukraine has evolved into a reciprocal defense partnership involving technology transfers, industrial cooperation, tactical doctrine, operational experience, and potentially intelligence sharing. Russia benefits from access to a reliable supplier capable of producing large quantities of inexpensive long-range attack drones, while Iran gains access to combat-driven modernization derived from the largest sustained employment of loitering munitions in contemporary warfare.

From an operational perspective, one of Russia's most significant contributions has been transforming the Geran family into an industrial-scale precision-strike capability. Russian production facilities are now believed to be capable of manufacturing several thousand Geran drones annually while continuously integrating battlefield lessons into successive production batches. This rapid adaptation cycle allows improvements in navigation, electronic warfare resistance, production efficiency, guidance software, and attack tactics to be fielded within months rather than years. If these innovations continue flowing back into Iran's drone industry, Tehran could significantly expand both the effectiveness and the scale of future long-range strike operations.

For NATO and U.S. defense planners, the reported cooperation demonstrates how lessons learned during the war in Ukraine are increasingly influencing military developments far beyond Europe. Russia's experience in industrial drone production, electronic warfare, air-defense penetration, and long-range precision-strike operations now appears capable of reinforcing Iranian military capabilities in the Middle East. This emerging exchange of technology and operational expertise creates a more sophisticated threat environment for U.S. military forces, allied air-defense networks, naval task groups, and forward operating bases across the region.

Strategically, the reported intelligence underscores that future conflicts are likely to involve increasingly integrated partnerships among U.S. adversaries rather than isolated national military capabilities. Modern warfare is becoming defined not only by the transfer of weapons but also by the exchange of operational data, AI-assisted targeting, satellite intelligence, electronic warfare expertise, and industrial manufacturing techniques. For the Pentagon and NATO, countering this evolving threat will require continued investment in layered air-defense systems, electronic warfare capabilities, AI-enabled detection networks, and integrated counter-unmanned aircraft systems capable of defeating increasingly sophisticated loitering munition attacks.


Explore More Defense News


Land Defense News
Naval Defense News
Defense Aerospace News

Written by Alain Servaes – Chief Editor, Army Recognition Group
Alain Servaes is a former infantry non-commissioned officer and the founder of Army Recognition. With over 20 years in defense journalism, he provides expert analysis on military equipment, NATO operations, and the global defense industry.
 
Open Source Intel @Osint613
For the first time in weeks, the IAF struck a series of targets in southern Lebanon over Hezbollah's ceasefire violation. Israeli officials say the response is not finished, with further options being weighed for political-level approval.

Kann News.
 

View: http://twitter.com/Reuters/status/2084583938530377989?s=20

US has used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war, sources say​

  • Summary
  • US has used 'virtually all' PrSM and ATACM munitions, two sources say
  • US also burned through a little less than half its global Tomahawk supply, one source says
  • Some officials worry the low stockpiles will affect US readiness should another conflict break out
NEW YORK/WASHINGTON, Aug 4 (Reuters) - The U.S. Army has used up much of its global stockpile of highly accurate long-range missiles during its five-month war with Iran, according to three people familiar with the data, raising concerns about the military's readiness for future conflicts.

The missiles are principally the Army's surface-to-surface weapons, known as Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) and Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM). The U.S. ‌has used "virtually all" of these weapons, according to two of the sources.

The degree to which the military is running out of ATACMS and Precision Strike Missiles has not been previously reported.

The long-range munitions – which cost more than $1 million each – are an important part of the military's arsenal, allowing accurate strikes from a safe distance. U.S.-supplied ATACMS have played a key role in the war in Ukraine, allowing Ukrainian forces to attack targets inside Russia. The PrSM is a newer, more advanced generation that will replace the ATACMS, which have a shorter range.

The dramatic rundown in precision, long-range missiles means U.S. President Donald Trump may have to rely more on riskier, piloted bombing missions if he relaunches large-scale attacks on Iran.
The sources declined to say how many of each munition the U.S. had left.

Trump launched the Iran war jointly with Israel in February, predicting that the conflict would last a short time.

But as the war drags on, the three people familiar with the matter expressed worry that the falling missile supplies could limit the U.S. ability ⁠to deter adversaries, including Russia and China.

A fourth person familiar with the matter said that despite the high usage of precision weapons, the U.S. can resupply. Central Command — which oversees U.S. forces in the Middle East — has been able to reload from U.S. military supplies around the world, the person said.
The sources interviewed for this story spoke on the condition of anonymity.

Asked for comment on the stockpile data, the White House issued a statement from Trump, saying the U.S. had “far more munitions than anyone in the world" and "far more than we need."

"Our defense companies are, at this moment, making more munitions than they have ever made before, in addition to expanding their plants and equipment at record levels," Trump said.

Analysts agree that certain munitions, including artillery shells and several types of missiles, are being produced at record levels but caution that supplies might fall short of what is needed for a prolonged war.

Lockheed Martin, which makes the ATACMS and PrSMs, along with the anti-ballistic missile THAAD system, did not immediately respond to questions about Trump's statements or about supply levels. Raytheon, which makes Tomahawk missiles and Patriot interceptors, two important U.S. weapons, also did not immediately respond.

Responding to a request for comment, chief Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said: “America’s military is the most powerful in the world and has everything it needs to execute at the time and place of the President’s choosing. We have executed multiple successful operations across combatant commands while ensuring the U.S. military possesses a deep arsenal of capabilities to protect our people and our interests.”

The supply figures have circulated inside the federal government over the last week during tense conversations inside the Trump administration about how ‌much longer the ⁠U.S. can continue striking Iran without drawing down the stockpile to levels that would limit the military's ability to respond to crises elsewhere.

WARNINGS OVER WEAPONS SUPPLIES​

One of the sources said the drawdown of the ATACMS and PrSM stockpiles reflected a decision by the Trump administration to avoid riskier ways of attacking Iranian targets, such as by using piloted aircraft to drop bombs.

Because these weapons allow the military to attack targets from a distance, analysts say they would be valuable in a war against an adversary with strong air defenses, such as China. They have been used to strike targets inside Iran, according to a March report by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).

According to the report, PrSM stockpiles were low to start with, since it is a relatively new munition, but the U.S. military has ordered a large number of them for 2027. The Army has said that ATACMS are being phased out and ⁠that production is shifting to the newer PrSM missiles.
Military leaders have for weeks warned the president that stockpiles of defensive weapons — including Patriot interceptors, which are effective against ballistic missiles — were dwindling, said two of the sources. Last week, several media outlets reported Trump had decided not to launch another massive offensive inside Iran in part because his military advisers had warned about the U.S. stockpile.

A U.S. official disputed those accounts, saying Trump chose not to move forward with another attack because of pressure from Gulf states.

The Middle East conflict has sparked intense debate about Trump's authority to prosecute hostilities against Iran without congressional ⁠authorization. No request for a declaration of war or an authorization to use military force has been submitted to Congress.

DEFENSIVE WEAPON STOCKS ARE ALSO DIMINISHED​


Last week, CSIS published a report estimating that between February and July about 65% of Patriot interceptors had been expended and that the number of THAAD ballistic missile interceptors in U.S. stockpiles was at least 38% lower than at the start of the war. Patriots and THAADs are systems that detect and destroy incoming missiles and are among the most effective in the country's arsenal.

While Reuters has not seen the ⁠supply figures, those numbers match internal U.S. data, two of the sources said.

The U.S. also burned through a little less than half of its global supply of Tomahawk cruise missiles, which are generally launched from ships, since the start of the war, one of the sources said.

Reuters could not independently verify that number.

The Tomahawk is a Navy weapon, launched from destroyers, cruisers and submarines, and has long served as the sea service's principal means of striking heavily defended targets without risking pilots.
Raytheon, a unit of RTX (RTX.N), opens new tab, has reached a tentative multi-year agreement with the Pentagon aimed at boosting Tomahawk production, alongside increases in other munitions, as Washington races to rebuild stockpiles.

Reporting by Erin Banco, Mike Stone and Jonathan Landay; Editing by Don Durfee, Rod Nickel and Stephen Coates


Hegseth disputes reports of depleted US missile interceptor stocks​



060826STOCKPILEphoto02.JPG


Army air defense artillerymen prepare Patriot missile interceptors for movement in the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility on May 11, 2026. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has disputed reports about depletion of U.S. missile defenses in the war with Iran. (U.S. Army)

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Tuesday pushed back against reports that the war with Iran has sharply reduced U.S. inventories of missile interceptors.

Responding to a screenshot of a CNN news banner on X, Hegseth dismissed the reporting as “NOT TRUE” and added: “Shame on you.”

CNN reported that the United States has used nearly 80% of its Terminal High Altitude Area Defense missile stockpile and about half of its Patriot interceptors since the war began, citing sources familiar with a recent inventory assessment.

Senior U.S. military leaders have warned that the Pentagon’s munitions stockpile is becoming “dangerously low,”
according to CNN.

The report echoed concerns raised last week by the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a bipartisan think tank in Washington, which concluded that U.S. missile stockpiles have been significantly depleted.

CSIS analysts estimated that the U.S. has between 759 and 827 Patriot interceptors left, roughly a third of its prewar inventory. The U.S. also has an estimated 234 to 278 THAAD interceptors remaining, down from 452 before the war, according to the July 27 report.

American and partner forces have relied heavily on the Patriot and THAAD systems to defend troops and bases against Iranian ballistic missile attacks across the Middle East.

The ground-based systems have reportedly intercepted the vast majority of Iranian projectiles, but CSIS experts have warned that it could take two to three years or longer to restore prewar levels.

In an interview last week with PBS, Jerry McGinn, a former senior official in the Defense Department’s Office of Manufacturing and Industrial Base Policy, said the Patriot and other munitions were not “designed to be built like Ford trucks” and are essentially handmade.

From contract award to delivery, it can take 24 months to create a Patriot missile, he said.

Despite the diminished stockpile, CSIS analysts said the U.S. has enough missile interceptors on hand “for any plausible scenario in the war against Iran,” with the risk coming from any potential future wars, particularly with China.

On Monday, the Defense Department announced agreements with Northrop Grumman and Lockheed Martin aimed at tripling and quadrupling the production of Patriot and THAAD missiles, respectively.

In the meantime, another ceasefire with Iran could be on the horizon, with reports Wednesday that the U.S., Iran and Oman are closing in on an interim agreement to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, Axios reported, citing two regional sources and a U.S. official.

President Donald Trump said Tuesday that a deal could be imminent, a claim he has repeated throughout the five-month war.

“It could happen. Tomorrow or the next day,” he said while speaking with reporters traveling with him in California. “A lot of progress has been made.”’

The deal being considered would establish a 60-day temporary arrangement between Oman and Iran in the Strait of Hormuz, and no tolls would be charged, among other conditions, Axios reported.

On Saturday, Trump said he had canceled plans for military strikes against Iran in expectation of reaching a deal to reopen the strait and in response to requests from Iran and other countries in the region.

“Based on this request, I have agreed, for the future benefit of the WORLD and, likewise, the survival of a successful and prosperous Iran, to cancel the attack, subject to being able to rapidly make a DEAL,” he said on his Truth Social platform.

The war began with joint U.S.-Israeli strikes on Feb. 28 and has since killed 18 U.S. service members and wounded more than 650 others.

Hegseth disputes reports of depleted US missile interceptor stocks
 
Well, Lockheed was only making 96 THAAD's per year prior to the Iran war, and the stockpile in US inventory was 452.
Current reports show about 90 THAAD's remain in inventory, so even the numbers reported by the mil indicate a large reduction. However, the gov has increased the contract 4 fold and has contracted for 400 THAAD's "per year" going forward, but those will take some time to reach actual inventory. Actual statements from Lockheed estimate it will take 3 years to replace the number to pre-war amounts before they will reach the 400/yr contract.
Okay. This can be called a comment and may be deleted. It is also a bit of personal history. Back during the first gulf war, Mom worked for Martin Merrietta. (sp?) making components for the Patriot missile. When the war started, production requirements went up. Mom put in a lot of over-time. Maybe I’m mistaken, but I seem to recall upthread, MUCH earlier, there was a report that Pres. Trump had invoked something that FRD got passed during WW II, allowing him to require increased output from suppliers. Given what I know HAS happened from direct involvement, I don’t believe people like Lockheed have been sitting around waiting for the next order.
 
Watching Tousi. So far a lot about the surprise attack that wasn’t. I’ll skip that. But one small yet important detail has come out. For a while now there have been videos from Iran with hand written signs asking for guns. The new thing is that someone is now mass producing signs saying in English, “ARM US” and has the imperial lion symbol on it. Tousi reports these things are starting to pop up everywhere.

Also at least three ‘gas leak’ explosions in Tehran. They HAVE NOT been linked to any air strike.
 
Top