I WOULD TAKE A HUNDRED BULLETS FOR HER
- Thread starter skip1
- Start date
kozanne
Inactive
http://www.motivationtruth.com/2009/06/i-spent-this-morning-with-sarah-palin.html
Check out this first person accout of her meeting Sarah in NY:
Check out this first person accout of her meeting Sarah in NY:
kozanne
Inactive
http://nygoe.wordpress.com/2009/06/06/sarah-palin-visits-new-york-state/
This is the link to Gathering Of Eagles NY, who are following the Palin tour. Lots and lots of links to photos and videos as well as other blogs you may find interesting to read.
This is the link to Gathering Of Eagles NY, who are following the Palin tour. Lots and lots of links to photos and videos as well as other blogs you may find interesting to read.
kozanne
Inactive
Then I'm in, buddy. I'm in. Guess I got some phone calls to make in the meantime.....
REVOULTION?
Videos are nearly useless to the dial-up crowd. And I'm much more interested in ideas than cheerleading. The last thing this country needs is another demagogue, another personality cult.
kozanne
Inactive
If you look at the thread on Sarah's appearances in New York, you will find multitudes of links on text and photos you can get her ideas from.
And who says cheerleading isn't all bad right now? We are a very demoralized nation and we could use some uplifting talk right now.
http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/showthread.php?t=334660 - forgot the link.
night driver
ESFP adrift in INTJ sea
Need someone to carry yer luggage????
Oh man, that is one person I would actually volunteer for (even IF paid might be nice I don't quite care....)
Oh man, that is one person I would actually volunteer for (even IF paid might be nice I don't quite care....)
I don't know Sara Palin.
That said.
I think she did rather well during the campaign for VP.
I also know that the MSM did a number on her for sure. Both during and AFTER the campaign.
Any one who received the amount of Negative and frivolous lawsuits After the campaign must have something going for her.
What did the MSM know back then that I didn't know?
I'm leaning to wards her, but at this point I kneed to know more about her.
lw
ps. I have dial up, and it is as slow as molasses in January, in AK. So I won't attempt to click on links that are long and drawn out. No vids. No pics.
That said.
I think she did rather well during the campaign for VP.
I also know that the MSM did a number on her for sure. Both during and AFTER the campaign.
Any one who received the amount of Negative and frivolous lawsuits After the campaign must have something going for her.
What did the MSM know back then that I didn't know?
I'm leaning to wards her, but at this point I kneed to know more about her.
lw
ps. I have dial up, and it is as slow as molasses in January, in AK. So I won't attempt to click on links that are long and drawn out. No vids. No pics.
YUP... BIG DIFFERENCE BETWEEN O AND
Flippper
Time Traveler
Well I hope she's all she's cracked up to be and not just another NWO shill (which I sincerely believe she is or is being courted to be).
Koz, if you end up working for her tell her to please get Lasik, those glasses make her look like a dork and distract from what she's saying and her hairstyle makes her look frowsy and unkempt, disorganized-all I can think of is how much better she'd look without the specs and a decent haircut, not the content of her speeches. And I'm female. And straight. So I know other people are thinking the same things. If she has to use sex appeal to get where she wants to be she'd better go for it, the NWO bunch uses race and any other trick they can pull.
IMAGE IS EVERYTHING; having a business taught me that. It doesn't matter that you're selling the same old product, if the package looks really good people will fight eachother to buy it. People are funny.
I really, really, REALLY hope she is what she claims to be and stands strong against the seductive pull of globalists desperate to get their last bits of control, but somehow I have a sinking feeling she's just more of the same of what we've had and got. We'll know when she chooses her running mate-Huckabee, Romney, Gingrich or any other usual suspect and I'll know she's one of them without reservation. Ron Paul would be a positive choice I'd think. Just rambling here, because I don't hold much stock in elections or our nation lasting long enough to get to another major election. The good news is, we have the God of the Universe on our side.
Koz, if you end up working for her tell her to please get Lasik, those glasses make her look like a dork and distract from what she's saying and her hairstyle makes her look frowsy and unkempt, disorganized-all I can think of is how much better she'd look without the specs and a decent haircut, not the content of her speeches. And I'm female. And straight. So I know other people are thinking the same things. If she has to use sex appeal to get where she wants to be she'd better go for it, the NWO bunch uses race and any other trick they can pull.
IMAGE IS EVERYTHING; having a business taught me that. It doesn't matter that you're selling the same old product, if the package looks really good people will fight eachother to buy it. People are funny.
I really, really, REALLY hope she is what she claims to be and stands strong against the seductive pull of globalists desperate to get their last bits of control, but somehow I have a sinking feeling she's just more of the same of what we've had and got. We'll know when she chooses her running mate-Huckabee, Romney, Gingrich or any other usual suspect and I'll know she's one of them without reservation. Ron Paul would be a positive choice I'd think. Just rambling here, because I don't hold much stock in elections or our nation lasting long enough to get to another major election. The good news is, we have the God of the Universe on our side.
YUP
AMERICAN LEFT KNOWS WHO IS THE GREATEST THREAT TO THEIR POWER...
TAKE A LOOK...
I SEE AN ALASKAN BANNER...NEXT TO FLORIDA...BUT NO ARIZONIA ONE... BUT WAS NOT McCAIN THE PRESIDENTIAL PICK... SO WHY ALASKA????
OH ALEXL
ROD INC. KNOWS
FYI: that picture was taken not from a video...so it was put out there by the MSM for a reason
AMERICAN LEFT KNOWS WHO IS THE GREATEST THREAT TO THEIR POWER...
TAKE A LOOK...
I SEE AN ALASKAN BANNER...NEXT TO FLORIDA...BUT NO ARIZONIA ONE... BUT WAS NOT McCAIN THE PRESIDENTIAL PICK... SO WHY ALASKA????
OH ALEXL
FYI: that picture was taken not from a video...so it was put out there by the MSM for a reason
Last edited:
AzProtector
Veteran Member
I would volunteer for Sarah, in a heartbeat.
I really think she would be the Hope and Change the country needs...not wants.
I really think she would be the Hope and Change the country needs...not wants.
BlueNewton
Veteran Member
If she would tweak a couple of her policies to more libertarian (less religiously conservative and more politically conservative--as the Republican party should be) I would be completely behind her. Regardless, I respect her as a person and her views. On the other hand, the whole gig is rigged, so what is the point?
I'm waiting for straight talk.
All this nicey nice respectful treatment of the opposition only helped the opposition win. Palin should have leaned over and slapped Charlie. She didn't even call him on his snottiness.
I won't back anyone who enables (pc talk for kisses their butts) the opposition of liberty.
All this nicey nice respectful treatment of the opposition only helped the opposition win. Palin should have leaned over and slapped Charlie. She didn't even call him on his snottiness.
I won't back anyone who enables (pc talk for kisses their butts) the opposition of liberty.
ainitfunny
Saved, to glorify God.
She would be a president I would trust unless she got surrounded with and listened to a bunch of evil advisors and international, behind the curtain, powers that be.
BigBadBossyDog
Membership Revoked
fruit loop
Inactive
Fortunately her appeal is limited. I would almost rather have The Shrub back than her. One is as bad as the other.
BigBadBossyDog
Membership Revoked
kozanne
Inactive
I went back to you tube just so I could see that speech again. I swear the whole neighborhood could have heard me hollering I was so EXCITED and so in agreement with what she was saying.
However, my liberal family members were totally appalled. You could hear my mother gasping for breath over the phone lines from 20 feet away! "What do you mean you loved her?"
However, my liberal family members were totally appalled. You could hear my mother gasping for breath over the phone lines from 20 feet away! "What do you mean you loved her?"
Green
Paranoid in Los Angeles
I can't think of a single person who cares what you think.
Think again.
Much More Than This
Alaskans concerned about North Korea's missiles
Jun 6, 3:37 PM (ET)
By MARY PEMBERTON
ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) - Alaskans are concerned over the prospect that North Korea is getting ready to test a long-range missile that could reach strategic targets in their home state.
And they're not buying Defense Secretary Robert Gates' assertion during a visit this past week to one of Alaska's many military installations that the missile is not a threat to the United States.
"I think we would definitely be a target because of the oil and the military," said Dale Walberg, owner of a small greenhouse business in Eagle River. "They are just so secretive. What do we really know?"
There's been no direct threat against Alaska or anywhere else, but the missile North Korea is believed to be assembling for a test may have a range of 4,000 miles, putting Hawaii and much of Alaska within reach.
Alaska's two largest cities, Anchorage and Fairbanks, have both Air Force and Army bases. There's also Fort Greely, home of the Missile Defense Complex. The U.S. plans to store 26 ground-based missile interceptors in silos at the base, about 100 miles south of Fairbanks.
Other high-profile potential targets would include Prudhoe Bay, the nation's largest oil field, or Valdez, the terminus of the 800-mile trans-Alaska pipeline.
Bert Cottle, mayor of Valdez, where 16 percent of the nation's domestic oil production is loaded onto tankers for delivery to the West Coast, said he checked with two military leaders in Alaska to get their take on the developing missile situation and was told everything is status quo.
"We will wait for further updates," he said.
In the meantime, the state's political leaders are using the missile situation to send a message to the Obama administration: Maintain a strong military presence in Alaska.
Rep. Don Young, R-Alaska, sent a letter to Gates urging him to reconsider a decision to not complete construction of a second missile defense field at Greely and to place a cap on F-22 fighters at Elmendorf Air Force Base.
"We are sending the wrong message to our enemies by stopping the placement of these interceptors," Young's letter said. "While 30 interceptors may be enough to counter the current threat from North Korea, it is clear that it will not be enough in the future."
Sen. Mark Begich, D-Alaska, said he would continue to push for the installation of the final 14 interceptors.
"It may be just one missile positioned today, but who knows what surprise North Korea will announce next?" Begich said.
Dan Goure, vice president of defense studies at the Lexington Institute in Alexandria, Va., said Alaskans should be outraged by the Obama administration decision to scale back Greely's missile defense program.
"The most desirable targets these guys can hit are all in Alaska and the system that is being deployed is inadequate," Goure said. "You may say I will trust the president to stand up to that threat, but do the people of Alaska want to be put on that front line?"
William English, 72, of Eagle River, thinks the threat from North Korea's long-range missile is real.
"I think they are going to find a target to shoot it at, right here. You lose Prudhoe Bay and the state is gone," said English, who worked as an electrical engineer on the North Slope for 26 years.
English thinks the North Korean leader is "crazy as hell."
About 15 miles east of Fairbanks, the town of North Pole has just 2,100 residents but Mayor Doug Isaacson thinks it would likely be on North Korea's list of attractive targets. It's less than 10 miles from the Army's Fort Wainwright with 7,180 soldiers and from Eielson Air Force Base with 3,010 military personnel. It also has two oil refineries.
"I am sure that if anybody is looking at strategic locations North Pole is probably on the radar," he said.
Isaacson said he has contacted public affairs officers at Fort Wainwright and local borough officials and department heads to discuss emergency plans.
"Right now, I don't think there is much consideration that there is a serious threat, but having said that everything is possible and every eventuality needs to be looked at," he said.
In Hawaii, where the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor ushered the U.S. into World War II, people are more concerned with the state's high unemployment rate, which has doubled over the past year, and the governor's order furloughing state employees to cope with a sharp revenue decline.
Hawaiians also doubt North Korea would fire a missile at the U.S.
"I think it's bluffing," said Tim Luster, a 45-year-old in the music retail business. "It doesn't really make sense to me that they would directly attack the United States. It seems a little outlandish."
But in Anchorage, Francis Merriman, a 61-year-old boat captain, thinks the North Korea missile threat must be taken very seriously.
"Do they have nuclear warheads?" Merriman asked. "Don't we have any way of shooting them down?"
---
Associated Press Writer Audrey McAvoy in Honolulu contributed to this report.
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090606/D98LCAM81.html
Alaskans concerned about North Korea's missiles
Jun 6, 3:37 PM (ET)
By MARY PEMBERTON
ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) - Alaskans are concerned over the prospect that North Korea is getting ready to test a long-range missile that could reach strategic targets in their home state.
And they're not buying Defense Secretary Robert Gates' assertion during a visit this past week to one of Alaska's many military installations that the missile is not a threat to the United States.
"I think we would definitely be a target because of the oil and the military," said Dale Walberg, owner of a small greenhouse business in Eagle River. "They are just so secretive. What do we really know?"
There's been no direct threat against Alaska or anywhere else, but the missile North Korea is believed to be assembling for a test may have a range of 4,000 miles, putting Hawaii and much of Alaska within reach.
Alaska's two largest cities, Anchorage and Fairbanks, have both Air Force and Army bases. There's also Fort Greely, home of the Missile Defense Complex. The U.S. plans to store 26 ground-based missile interceptors in silos at the base, about 100 miles south of Fairbanks.
Other high-profile potential targets would include Prudhoe Bay, the nation's largest oil field, or Valdez, the terminus of the 800-mile trans-Alaska pipeline.
Bert Cottle, mayor of Valdez, where 16 percent of the nation's domestic oil production is loaded onto tankers for delivery to the West Coast, said he checked with two military leaders in Alaska to get their take on the developing missile situation and was told everything is status quo.
"We will wait for further updates," he said.
In the meantime, the state's political leaders are using the missile situation to send a message to the Obama administration: Maintain a strong military presence in Alaska.
Rep. Don Young, R-Alaska, sent a letter to Gates urging him to reconsider a decision to not complete construction of a second missile defense field at Greely and to place a cap on F-22 fighters at Elmendorf Air Force Base.
"We are sending the wrong message to our enemies by stopping the placement of these interceptors," Young's letter said. "While 30 interceptors may be enough to counter the current threat from North Korea, it is clear that it will not be enough in the future."
Sen. Mark Begich, D-Alaska, said he would continue to push for the installation of the final 14 interceptors.
"It may be just one missile positioned today, but who knows what surprise North Korea will announce next?" Begich said.
Dan Goure, vice president of defense studies at the Lexington Institute in Alexandria, Va., said Alaskans should be outraged by the Obama administration decision to scale back Greely's missile defense program.
"The most desirable targets these guys can hit are all in Alaska and the system that is being deployed is inadequate," Goure said. "You may say I will trust the president to stand up to that threat, but do the people of Alaska want to be put on that front line?"
William English, 72, of Eagle River, thinks the threat from North Korea's long-range missile is real.
"I think they are going to find a target to shoot it at, right here. You lose Prudhoe Bay and the state is gone," said English, who worked as an electrical engineer on the North Slope for 26 years.
English thinks the North Korean leader is "crazy as hell."
About 15 miles east of Fairbanks, the town of North Pole has just 2,100 residents but Mayor Doug Isaacson thinks it would likely be on North Korea's list of attractive targets. It's less than 10 miles from the Army's Fort Wainwright with 7,180 soldiers and from Eielson Air Force Base with 3,010 military personnel. It also has two oil refineries.
"I am sure that if anybody is looking at strategic locations North Pole is probably on the radar," he said.
Isaacson said he has contacted public affairs officers at Fort Wainwright and local borough officials and department heads to discuss emergency plans.
"Right now, I don't think there is much consideration that there is a serious threat, but having said that everything is possible and every eventuality needs to be looked at," he said.
In Hawaii, where the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor ushered the U.S. into World War II, people are more concerned with the state's high unemployment rate, which has doubled over the past year, and the governor's order furloughing state employees to cope with a sharp revenue decline.
Hawaiians also doubt North Korea would fire a missile at the U.S.
"I think it's bluffing," said Tim Luster, a 45-year-old in the music retail business. "It doesn't really make sense to me that they would directly attack the United States. It seems a little outlandish."
But in Anchorage, Francis Merriman, a 61-year-old boat captain, thinks the North Korea missile threat must be taken very seriously.
"Do they have nuclear warheads?" Merriman asked. "Don't we have any way of shooting them down?"
---
Associated Press Writer Audrey McAvoy in Honolulu contributed to this report.
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090606/D98LCAM81.html
YUP I WOULD TAKE A HUNDRED BULLETS FOR HER!!!!!
Ronald Reagan Day
WHEREAS, President Ronald Wilson Reagan, a man of humble background, worked throughout his life serving freedom and advancing the public good, having been employed as an entertainer, Union leader, corporate spokesman, Governor of California, and President of the United States.
WHEREAS, Ronald Reagan served with honor and distinction for two terms as the 40th President of the United States of America; the second of which he earned the confidence of three-fifths of the electorate and was victorious in 49 of the 50 states in the general election – a record unsurpassed in the history of American presidential elections.
WHEREAS, in 1981, when Ronald Reagan was inaugurated President, he inherited a disillusioned nation shackled by rampant inflation and high unemployment.
WHEREAS, during Ronald Reagan’s presidency, he worked in a bipartisan manner to enact his bold agenda of restoring accountability and common sense to government which led to an unprecedented economic expansion and opportunity for millions of Americans.
WHEREAS, President Reagan’s commitment to an active social policy agenda for the nation’s children helped lower crime and drug use in our neighborhoods.
WHEREAS, President Reagan’s commitment to our armed forces contributed to the restoration of pride in America, her values, and those cherished by the free world, and prepared America’s Armed Forces to meet Twenty-First Century challenges.
WHEREAS, President Reagan’s vision of “peace through strength” led to the end of the Cold War and the ultimate demise of the Soviet Union, guaranteeing basic human rights for millions of people.
WHEREAS, February 6, 2008, will be the 97th anniversary of Ronald Reagan's birth, and the fourth since his passing.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Sarah Palin, Governor of the State of Alaska, do hereby proclaim February 6, 2008, as:
Ronald Reagan Day
in Alaska, and urge the citizens of Alaska to take cognizance of this event and participate fittingly in its observance.
Dated: January 11, 2008
http://gov.state.ak.us/archive.php?id=832&type=6
FYI: SHE DID THIS BEFORE SHE WAS PICKED FOR V.P. EVEN CONSIDERED
Ronald Reagan Day
WHEREAS, President Ronald Wilson Reagan, a man of humble background, worked throughout his life serving freedom and advancing the public good, having been employed as an entertainer, Union leader, corporate spokesman, Governor of California, and President of the United States.
WHEREAS, Ronald Reagan served with honor and distinction for two terms as the 40th President of the United States of America; the second of which he earned the confidence of three-fifths of the electorate and was victorious in 49 of the 50 states in the general election – a record unsurpassed in the history of American presidential elections.
WHEREAS, in 1981, when Ronald Reagan was inaugurated President, he inherited a disillusioned nation shackled by rampant inflation and high unemployment.
WHEREAS, during Ronald Reagan’s presidency, he worked in a bipartisan manner to enact his bold agenda of restoring accountability and common sense to government which led to an unprecedented economic expansion and opportunity for millions of Americans.
WHEREAS, President Reagan’s commitment to an active social policy agenda for the nation’s children helped lower crime and drug use in our neighborhoods.
WHEREAS, President Reagan’s commitment to our armed forces contributed to the restoration of pride in America, her values, and those cherished by the free world, and prepared America’s Armed Forces to meet Twenty-First Century challenges.
WHEREAS, President Reagan’s vision of “peace through strength” led to the end of the Cold War and the ultimate demise of the Soviet Union, guaranteeing basic human rights for millions of people.
WHEREAS, February 6, 2008, will be the 97th anniversary of Ronald Reagan's birth, and the fourth since his passing.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Sarah Palin, Governor of the State of Alaska, do hereby proclaim February 6, 2008, as:
Ronald Reagan Day
in Alaska, and urge the citizens of Alaska to take cognizance of this event and participate fittingly in its observance.
Dated: January 11, 2008
http://gov.state.ak.us/archive.php?id=832&type=6
FYI: SHE DID THIS BEFORE SHE WAS PICKED FOR V.P. EVEN CONSIDERED
Binkerthebear
Veteran Member
I can't think of a single person who cares what you think.
FL's mama cares. That's it. ...wait, no even mama don't care.
Binkerthebear
Veteran Member
et2
Has No Life - Lives on TB
I can't think of a single person who cares what you think.
You are one rude ...you know what. The same could be said for you.