GOV/MIL HHS Secretary Kennedy announces decertification of the organ procurement organization, 'Network for Hope,' due to persistent patient safety failures

auxman

Deus vult...
Cardinal has posted several threads on the subject over the years. It's heartbreaking and eye opening... but not especially surprising. Human nature never changes, and when huge sums of money are involved, morals and ethics get ignored. :shk:

Just looking at the titles and dates, you can see the slippery slope, speeding up.









Summerthyme
 
And another cautionary tale....


An died after suffering a heart attack during sex before his grieving wife had to fight off strangers trying to harvest his organs.

Keith Lott, 47, suffered cardiac arrest at his home in Swedesboro, new Jersey on May 16.

His grieving wife Brook said she called 911 after her husband began foaming at the mouth, news outlet NJ.com reports.

Paramedics rushed Keith to hospital where he was placed on a ventilator and a CAT scan later revealed he had swelling on his brain.

He was declared brain dead at 4.12pm three days later.

But within an hour members of the NJ Sharing Network turned up to discuss his organ donation, Brook said.

Keith was registered as an organ donor until he opted out of the registry last year.

His decision came two years after he converted to Islam. Some Muslims are against organ donation, believing the body should not be altered after death.

Keith’s family explained this to the NJ Sharing Network representatives but claim they would not respect their request.

His sister-in-law Tiffany, told the news outlet: “They kept saying when you check that box to be a donor, it’s a lifetime contract.”

The family even showed the reps Keith’s 2025 license, which did not list him as a donor.

But members of the organisation pushed back, telling the heartbroken family he should have gone to the registry to ensure he was removed.

According to Keith’s mother Minnie, members of the organisation “instructed the hospital” to keep Keith on life support “solely for organ preservation”.

The organisation then threatened to take the family and hospital to court over the incident, the Lott’s allege.

And it wasn’t until the family involved a state senator’s office that they backed down.

In a post on Facebook, Minnie, wrote: “It’s vital to know that registering for organ donation in New Jersey is a lifelong commitment that requires proactive steps to reverse.

“Families and loved ones should be aware of the importance of communicating one’s desires regarding organ donation.

“In this difficult situation, The Sharing Network’s actions are adding to the family’s distress.

“Sharing this story may help others avoid similar heart-wrenching experiences during vulnerable times.”

New Jersey Senator Paul Moriarty has since introduced a bill that requires organ procurement organisations to “access the latest” information available at the Motor Vehicle Commission (MVC).

In a statement to NJ.com, NJ Sharing Network agreed a donor can remove their registration at the MVC anytime.

A spokesperson said the organisation accesses the MVC database “in real time to verify the most up-to-date information regarding their organ donor status that is entered, updated, and provided from the MVC.”

The group is reportedly being probed by a Congressional committee over allegations of “fraud, cover-ups, and illegal practices”.

The Sun has approached the NJ Sharing Network for comments.

Summerthyme
 
The official pushback is starting...

This article was on my Google feed this morning. I clicked on it, knowing the BBC site is subscription only...I wondered if it was worth using the "block paywalls" site i have to use to be able to read ANY BBC article that interests me.


Lo and behold...no paywall *for this article*!

Summerthyme
 
They had a way to hide that organs are/were being harvested from living donors. Originally it was a good plan. Share organs from people who wanted to when a life taking accident occurred. There was no charge to the donating family, and the charge tothe ones receiving the donations was limited to the real costs.

Then the slope started. And it was applied to long term coma patients. And then it just kept sliding.

It became an industry. Insurance isn't going to object because it reduces their costs. Hospitals aren't going to object because they sell the donations and make money. It's already come out that several were actually charging the families for the procedures to take the donations.

Then it comes out that if you EVER signed up, even if you rescinded it, they would insist. And your family would have to fight.

And instead of it being something discussed as a last resort in the long term, it is discussed quickly, "so the organs are at their best".

So no, I'm not surprised. In fact, I'm debating printing up cards for my wallet that specify that I do not agree to be an organ donor.

The question is whether it can be stopped. Because I have no doubts that other agencies received organs from similar situations, but the family either didn't catch it or didn't care.
 
They had a way to hide that organs are/were being harvested from living donors. Originally it was a good plan. Share organs from people who wanted to when a life taking accident occurred. There was no charge to the donating family, and the charge tothe ones receiving the donations was limited to the real costs.

Then the slope started. And it was applied to long term coma patients. And then it just kept sliding.

It became an industry. Insurance isn't going to object because it reduces their costs. Hospitals aren't going to object because they sell the donations and make money. It's already come out that several were actually charging the families for the procedures to take the donations.

Then it comes out that if you EVER signed up, even if you rescinded it, they would insist. And your family would have to fight.

And instead of it being something discussed as a last resort in the long term, it is discussed quickly, "so the organs are at their best".

So no, I'm not surprised. In fact, I'm debating printing up cards for my wallet that specify that I do not agree to be an organ donor.

The question is whether it can be stopped. Because I have no doubts that other agencies received organs from similar situations, but the family either didn't catch it or didn't care.
I had a coworker whoose son was targeted for organ harvesting via a gang style hit. She settled out of court against the hospital for an unspecified sum. Some hospitals are really bad for it too. And they say China is bad for forced organ harvesting...
 
Over on x there are more than a handful of folks speaking out on the Canadian MAID forced euthanasia murder of the young and old who are disabled and with chronic illnesses. Evil.
 
Top