ECON FUNG RED *.*Economic Implications Concerning The Closing of the Strait of Hormuz (March 2026)

Status
Not open for further replies.

US blockade could cost Iran $18 billion a year, business chief says​

US maritime blockade could add about $18 billion annually to the Iran’s trade costs, the head of the Iran-China Chamber of Commerce said on Tuesday, warning against trying to adapt to it as Tehran did with sanctions.

Majidreza Hariri said transporting a container from China to Iran costs about $3,000 by sea, compared with an average of $12,000 over land. With around two million containers entering Iran’s southern ports annually, the additional $9,000 per container would impose about $18 billion in extra costs, he told KhabarOnline.

Hariri said the figure exceeded Iran’s annual spending of less than $15 billion on imports of essential goods and medicine.

“The worst thing that could happen today is for us to think we can circumvent the naval blockade and try to run the country despite it,: he said. “We did something similar with sanctions: instead of getting them lifted or finding a mechanism to neutralize them, we tried to circumvent them. The result was a weakened economy and widespread corruption.”

He also warned that moving Iran’s roughly $50 billion in annual non-oil exports over land would cost more than the profits they generated, making such trade economically unviable.

 
Remember folks.... Trump is losing... and Iran is winning.... You heard it here!! LOL...

Iranian workers report layoffs, months of unpaid wages

Workers across Iran’s mining, industrial and municipal sectors say they have gone months without full pay, while some employers have also cut staff, deepening pressure on households already struggling with rising living costs.

Messages sent to Iran International describe wage arrears ranging from several weeks to eight months at mining operations in different parts of the country. Iran International could not independently verify the accounts.

The wife of an employee at the Sanghan iron ore mine in Khaf, northeastern Iran, said her husband, who has worked there for 24 years, had not received a salary for three months despite receiving his work statement through late June.

Workers at the Chah Firouzeh copper mine in Kerman province were still waiting for their June wages, according to another message.

At Gol Gohar in Sirjan, also in Kerman, workers had gone eight months without pay and some employees had been dismissed without receiving wages owed to them, another message said.

Similar complaints have emerged from major industrial companies.

Employees at MAPNA Locomotive in Karaj, west of Tehran, have gone four months without full wages, according to information received by Iran International.

One employee said workers received just 20% of their salary last month and that the payment problems began during the 40-day war and have continued since. Staff are reluctant to protest because they fear layoffs and are already under severe financial pressure, the employee said.

Contract employees at Iran Air have also reported reduced and delayed pay since the war. One employee said salaries had not returned to previous levels even after the company’s revenues recovered, adding that workers who complained risked losing their jobs.

In Sari, a northern city near the Caspian Sea, another source told Iran International that municipal employees and workers had gone three months without pay.

“We really don’t know where to turn,” the source said.

Household pressure

The wage problems come amid broader economic strains acknowledged by senior Iranian officials.

Central Bank Governor Abdolnasser Hemmati said Friday there was “no doubt that Iran’s economy faces serious problems,” adding that war and economic pressure had worsened inflation and unemployment. He rejected, however, suggestions that the economy faced an “imminent collapse.”

Even for workers receiving their wages, earnings increasingly fall short of basic living costs.

The semi-official ILNA news agency reported that many households exhaust their salaries before the middle of the month, forcing them to rely on installment plans and credit for routine expenses.

Majid Rahmati, a member of Tehran’s Coordination Council of Islamic Labor Councils, said in May that the minimum monthly household living basket had risen to around 70 million tomans, while married workers were receiving roughly 24 million tomans a month.

Iran’s statutory base minimum wage is around 16.6 million tomans a month before benefits, according to a Labor Ministry wage directive reported by the Tasnim news agency.

For those waiting months to be paid, the problem is compounded by what workers describe as a lack of effective recourse.

Some employees told Iran International they feared layoffs if they protested over unpaid wages, while others said complaints to labor authorities had failed to produce results.

 

Once again, kids..... Iran has the upper hand, and Trump is losing.... :lol:

-----------------------------

Iran's economy buckles as blockade chokes oil exports and households cut meat, dairy and medicine​

Oil exports have fallen close to nothing, dairy consumption has collapsed by two-thirds since 2010, and patients are skipping treatment as prices outrun incomes.

Iran's economy is straining on multiple fronts at once as a renewed US blockade squeezes oil income and inflation erodes what households can still afford, according to Capital Economics. The war has hit Iran through four channels at once: output, oil income, inflation/real wages and the fiscal base.

The most painful change is that oil exports have fallen to close to zero in July, an income stream worth roughly 11% of GDP on an annualised basis, which is infecting the whole economy.

Five months of war have turned what was already a struggling Iranian economy into a deepening recession, simultaneously cutting the government's foreign-currency earnings, driving up prices and crushing household purchasing power.

The IMF now expects Iran's economy to shrink 5.4% in 2026, while consumer-price inflation averages 68.9%. The deterioration is substantially worse than expected before the fighting began: the World Bank's January outlook had forecast a contraction of about 1.5% in 2026/27, after an estimated 1.1% decline in 2025/26.

Early modelling by the UN Development Programme illustrates the potential scale of the shock. In March it estimated that disruption to trade, production and energy infrastructure could reduce Iranian GDP by 8.8–10.4 percentage points relative to a no-war scenario. That simulation assumed only a 28-day disruption; the conflict has now continued for more than five months.

For households the impact has been most visible in prices. Official figures showed year-on-year headline inflation reaching 71.8% in March, while food, beverages and tobacco rose 112.5%. Bread and cereals were up 140%, meat and poultry 135%, oils and fats 219%, fruit and nuts 104.2% and dairy products 116.8%. By June headline point-to-point inflation had reached about 88.6%, before edging down to 87.9% in July.

Tehran responded by raising the statutory minimum wage by about 60%, from roughly IRR103mn to IRR166mn rials a month, but even that increase has failed to keep pace with the cost of many necessities. The poorest households are particularly exposed: UNDP estimates they spend around 45% of total consumption on food, compared with 26% among the richest fifth of the population.

The government faces an increasingly serious fiscal squeeze as well. Iran entered the new fiscal year planning to obtain almost 52% of public resources from taxation, reducing its dependence on oil. But an economy ministry official warned in May that as much as 25% of projected tax revenue could now fail to materialise as recession hits companies and consumers. At the same time, oil exports — Tehran's principal source of hard currency — have been progressively choked off and by July had fallen close to zero.

That combination may prove the most economically damaging aspect of the war. Tehran is losing oil dollars just as inflation is eroding domestic incomes and recession is weakening the tax base needed to replace them. With usable foreign-exchange reserves already limited, the result is an increasingly severe adjustment being pushed on to Iranian households through higher prices, lower consumption and fewer imports.

The squeeze reaches the dinner table and the pharmacy

Annual dairy consumption has fallen from around 130 kg per person in 2010 to just 40 kg today, according to Ali Ehsan Zafari, head of Iran's Dairy Cooperatives Union, cited by Iran International. Dairy products cost around 147% more in July than a year earlier, per Iran's Statistical Center, leaving consumption well below the global average of roughly 117-119 kg a year, according to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization.

The same dynamic is showing up in healthcare: Iranians are increasingly forgoing treatment as drug shortages spread and insurance coverage falls short of rising costs, Iran International reported, citing patient accounts. One person undergoing tests for an abdominal and pelvic mass said CT and MRI scans cost 210mn rials ($113) — a bill that, for many Iranians, can consume most or all of a month's income even when covered by the state social insurer.

A shrinking economy with fewer buffers left

Iran's crude export pipeline on Kharg Island, its main oil terminal, is at a "complete halt" under the US blockade, with all of the island's terminals currently empty, according to maritime intelligence firm Windward, cited by Al Jazeera. Iranian tankers have been among the few that have been able to leave the Persian Gulf since the war started in March, earning Tehran considerable income. That business has been curtailed now.

Capital Economics estimates the country's oil exports fell to close to nothing in July after the blockade was reimposed and Kharg was shut for at least a week — a loss of income that, before the war, accounted for around 11% of Iran's GDP on an annualised basis.

To offset the lost export income without foreign borrowing, Capital Economics estimates Iran's imports need to fall by a roughly equivalent 75%, forcing a collapse in domestic demand; Chinese export data for April and May already point in that direction. The Iranian rial has fallen around 50% against the dollar on the parallel market over the past year, feeding into a food-price spiral that has already turned even Iran's favourite kebab into a luxury item.

Iran also has less of a cushion to fall back on than it did during the first blockade in April. Its usable foreign-exchange reserves were estimated by the IMF at $22.6bn in 2024 and were probably lower by the time this war began; its stock of at-sea oil that can be sold to raise hard currency has fallen from around 170-180mn barrels before the first blockade to roughly 60mn barrels in early July, and tightening financial sanctions are making even that oil harder to sell. President Donald Trump has signalled Washington intends to let this economic pressure do the work rather than negotiate on Iran's terms, a strategy Capital Economics said appeared to contribute to Iran's decision to agree to June's Hormuz-reopening memorandum with the US.

Whether pressure translates into concessions this time depends on Iran's internal politics: President Masoud Pezeshkian and other relative moderates appear worried about economic collapse and reportedly pushed for the June memorandum, but the regime remains divided, with hardliners currently in the ascendancy. Capital Economics noted that plenty of regimes — Cuba after 1959, Venezuela since 2012 — have kept power through economic collapse via repression and patronage, meaning economic pain alone is no guarantee of a policy shift.

 
I am sure the state of Iranian economy is going to be at the top of American voter’s concerns in November.

I hope the current administration and their proxies continue to make this a focal point of their attention leading into the election. The result will be fun to watch.
 
I am sure the state of Iranian economy is going to be at the top of American voter’s concerns in November.

I hope the current administration and their proxies continue to make this a focal point of their attention leading into the election. The result will be fun to watch.

The election focal point will be communism in the Democrat party and other types of radical retards in the big tent with them.
 

Once again, kids..... Iran has the upper hand, and Trump is losing.... :lol:

-----------------------------

Iran's economy buckles as blockade chokes oil exports and households cut meat, dairy and medicine​

Oil exports have fallen close to nothing, dairy consumption has collapsed by two-thirds since 2010, and patients are skipping treatment as prices outrun incomes.

Iran's economy is straining on multiple fronts at once as a renewed US blockade squeezes oil income and inflation erodes what households can still afford, according to Capital Economics. The war has hit Iran through four channels at once: output, oil income, inflation/real wages and the fiscal base.

The most painful change is that oil exports have fallen to close to zero in July, an income stream worth roughly 11% of GDP on an annualised basis, which is infecting the whole economy.

Five months of war have turned what was already a struggling Iranian economy into a deepening recession, simultaneously cutting the government's foreign-currency earnings, driving up prices and crushing household purchasing power.

The IMF now expects Iran's economy to shrink 5.4% in 2026, while consumer-price inflation averages 68.9%. The deterioration is substantially worse than expected before the fighting began: the World Bank's January outlook had forecast a contraction of about 1.5% in 2026/27, after an estimated 1.1% decline in 2025/26.

Early modelling by the UN Development Programme illustrates the potential scale of the shock. In March it estimated that disruption to trade, production and energy infrastructure could reduce Iranian GDP by 8.8–10.4 percentage points relative to a no-war scenario. That simulation assumed only a 28-day disruption; the conflict has now continued for more than five months.

For households the impact has been most visible in prices. Official figures showed year-on-year headline inflation reaching 71.8% in March, while food, beverages and tobacco rose 112.5%. Bread and cereals were up 140%, meat and poultry 135%, oils and fats 219%, fruit and nuts 104.2% and dairy products 116.8%. By June headline point-to-point inflation had reached about 88.6%, before edging down to 87.9% in July.

Tehran responded by raising the statutory minimum wage by about 60%, from roughly IRR103mn to IRR166mn rials a month, but even that increase has failed to keep pace with the cost of many necessities. The poorest households are particularly exposed: UNDP estimates they spend around 45% of total consumption on food, compared with 26% among the richest fifth of the population.

The government faces an increasingly serious fiscal squeeze as well. Iran entered the new fiscal year planning to obtain almost 52% of public resources from taxation, reducing its dependence on oil. But an economy ministry official warned in May that as much as 25% of projected tax revenue could now fail to materialise as recession hits companies and consumers. At the same time, oil exports — Tehran's principal source of hard currency — have been progressively choked off and by July had fallen close to zero.

That combination may prove the most economically damaging aspect of the war. Tehran is losing oil dollars just as inflation is eroding domestic incomes and recession is weakening the tax base needed to replace them. With usable foreign-exchange reserves already limited, the result is an increasingly severe adjustment being pushed on to Iranian households through higher prices, lower consumption and fewer imports.

The squeeze reaches the dinner table and the pharmacy

Annual dairy consumption has fallen from around 130 kg per person in 2010 to just 40 kg today, according to Ali Ehsan Zafari, head of Iran's Dairy Cooperatives Union, cited by Iran International. Dairy products cost around 147% more in July than a year earlier, per Iran's Statistical Center, leaving consumption well below the global average of roughly 117-119 kg a year, according to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization.

The same dynamic is showing up in healthcare: Iranians are increasingly forgoing treatment as drug shortages spread and insurance coverage falls short of rising costs, Iran International reported, citing patient accounts. One person undergoing tests for an abdominal and pelvic mass said CT and MRI scans cost 210mn rials ($113) — a bill that, for many Iranians, can consume most or all of a month's income even when covered by the state social insurer.

A shrinking economy with fewer buffers left

Iran's crude export pipeline on Kharg Island, its main oil terminal, is at a "complete halt" under the US blockade, with all of the island's terminals currently empty, according to maritime intelligence firm Windward, cited by Al Jazeera. Iranian tankers have been among the few that have been able to leave the Persian Gulf since the war started in March, earning Tehran considerable income. That business has been curtailed now.

Capital Economics estimates the country's oil exports fell to close to nothing in July after the blockade was reimposed and Kharg was shut for at least a week — a loss of income that, before the war, accounted for around 11% of Iran's GDP on an annualised basis.

To offset the lost export income without foreign borrowing, Capital Economics estimates Iran's imports need to fall by a roughly equivalent 75%, forcing a collapse in domestic demand; Chinese export data for April and May already point in that direction. The Iranian rial has fallen around 50% against the dollar on the parallel market over the past year, feeding into a food-price spiral that has already turned even Iran's favourite kebab into a luxury item.

Iran also has less of a cushion to fall back on than it did during the first blockade in April. Its usable foreign-exchange reserves were estimated by the IMF at $22.6bn in 2024 and were probably lower by the time this war began; its stock of at-sea oil that can be sold to raise hard currency has fallen from around 170-180mn barrels before the first blockade to roughly 60mn barrels in early July, and tightening financial sanctions are making even that oil harder to sell. President Donald Trump has signalled Washington intends to let this economic pressure do the work rather than negotiate on Iran's terms, a strategy Capital Economics said appeared to contribute to Iran's decision to agree to June's Hormuz-reopening memorandum with the US.

Whether pressure translates into concessions this time depends on Iran's internal politics: President Masoud Pezeshkian and other relative moderates appear worried about economic collapse and reportedly pushed for the June memorandum, but the regime remains divided, with hardliners currently in the ascendancy. Capital Economics noted that plenty of regimes — Cuba after 1959, Venezuela since 2012 — have kept power through economic collapse via repression and patronage, meaning economic pain alone is no guarantee of a policy shift.

Ah so glasshoppa....Confucius say...""War not determine who is right. War determine who is left."
 
Survival of the fittest.. King of the Mountain...

Hasn't it always been that way?

Which country do you want to live in? The USA or Iran, right now?
Glasshoppa...Confucius say "physical and mental fittness are desirable. However Confucious also say that strength and intelligence must be melded with a strong spiritual bond that is rooted into the individual's VERY CORE.

Note1: The Nazis had intelligence and physical prowess..
yet they lacked a spiritual core which could transcend this mortal coil and thus became part of the dustbin of man's history.
 
Glasshoppa...Confucius say "physical and mental fittness are desirable. However Confucious also say that strength and intelligence must be melded with a strong spiritual bond that is rooted into the individual's VERY CORE.
OK, but what does that have to do with the current economic issues Iran is having, due to the blockade?
 
I am sure the state of Iranian economy is going to be at the top of American voter’s concerns in November.

I hope the current administration and their proxies continue to make this a focal point of their attention leading into the election. The result will be fun to watch.
It just shows how much your buddies at CNN,MSDNC,AP,REUTERS,NPR, CBS,ABC,NBC,WSJ,WAPO,NYT, fabricate and make up untrue crap, on a daily basis.
 
OK, but what does that have to do with the current economic issues Iran is having, due to the blockade?
Your posting of Iran's devastated infrastructure and shattered economy were fair enough. They are sufferimg... no doubt. I vividly recall Viet Nam as if it were yesterday. Back then, the body count was crucial when transmitting propaganda to the 'gum' chewing American public. 'Charlie' lost practically every battle they fought against our troops...yet we folded and left Viet Nam in a friggin hurry. In point of fact, China and others were using Nam as a tar baby to weaken our resolve and drain our resources. My point is this.. wars of attrition are horrible, since innocents are used as canon fodder. There is a game afoot K.S. Options for us are dwindling...except for the nuclear option. If that option is played...well game over.

Note1: Check out Doc1's thread concerning this subject.
 
Your posting of Iran's devastated infrastructure and shattered economy were fair enough. They are sufferimg... no doubt.
The reason I posted Iran's economic situation, is because you started this thread regarding economic implications of the closing, and the majority of the followup posts in the thread were about economic implications... HERE...

So, there also needs to be a counterpoint on the economic issues Iran is facing too.

My point is this.. wars of attrition are horrible, since innocents are used as canon fodder.
Exactly!!

But the Anti-Americans posting in this thread, that keep saying Trump lost, and Iran is winning, simply isn't true.

Iran is taking a MAJOR economic beating right now, no bombs needed.
 
The reason I posted Iran's economic situation, is because you started this thread regarding economic implications of the closing, and the majority of the followup posts in the thread were about economic implications... HERE...

So, there also needs to be a counterpoint on the economic issues Iran is facing too.


Exactly!!

But the Anti-Americans posting in this thread, that keep saying Trump lost, and Iran is winning, simply isn't true.

Iran is taking a MAJOR economic beating right now, no bombs needed.
Fair enough K.S.
 
I truly hope the GOP continues pushing this latest “the Iranian economy is hurting” talking point.

Voters in November are going to reward them greatly for it.
 
I truly hope the GOP continues pushing this latest “the Iranian economy is hurting” talking point.

Voters in November are going to reward them greatly for it.
Which one of the two, do Americans have a bigger problem with:

A) Dropping bombs on Iran?

or

B) Squeezing them economically?
 
Well I won't comment on things that others know more about. I will say this , the politicians have taken the prosperity of the United States and what they haven't robbed they've given away. Inflation is caused by debasement of our money . We are currently at a point were the country will not rebound from the dept. Any body disagree?
I know some here are doing well but let's face it pre covid and now price wise things have changed dramatically and a big segment of the population is struggling.
It's not 1 thing such as fuel its everything.
Look up credit card dept history and look up credit card defalt history.
If you can put 2 and 2 together something is going on and it isn't good . What will the future bring, I wish i knew .
 

Foreign War, Domestic Cost: The Hidden Price of America’s Wars

The Iran war shows how conflicts abroad can reshape domestic priorities, transferring the economic burden of war onto ordinary Americans.


Foreign War, Domestic Cost: The Hidden Price of America’s Wars | Common Dreams

For Washington, war usually begins with decisions made behind closed doors and explained through familiar terms such as security, deterrence, and national interest. It is then presented through images of aircraft and missiles moving toward targets thousands of miles away. But for ordinary people, war often arrives more quietly: through the fuel pump, grocery bills, transportation costs, and household budgets that leave less room for basic needs.

The Iran war demonstrated this reality once again. A crisis in the Middle East quickly became connected to one of the world’s most sensitive energy choke points: the Strait of Hormuz. Concerns about disruptions to global energy flows showed how a conflict far from American shores can affect domestic economic conditions. For most Americans, the consequences are not measured through military operations or geopolitical calculations, but through higher energy costs, rising transportation expenses, and pressure on living standards.



Yet the cost of war extends beyond immediate economic effects. Measuring conflict only through oil prices or military spending overlooks a deeper question: what a country cannot invest in because resources are directed toward war.

No national budget is unlimited. Every billion dollars allocated to military operations, weapons purchases, troop deployments, or rebuilding stockpiles cannot be spent simultaneously on infrastructure, education, healthcare, housing, or other public priorities. This is the social opportunity cost of war: the value of needs that receive fewer resources because military commitments take precedence. Defense spending appears clearly in budgets, but the school never built, the infrastructure project delayed, or the public service left underfunded often remain invisible.

A country that spends vast resources on war in the name of security must also ask whether those choices strengthen or weaken the society that security is supposed to protect.

The economic consequences of war also spread through markets, supply chains, and production costs. Conflicts involving major energy-producing regions create uncertainty that eventually reaches households. However, these burdens are not shared equally. A wealthy family may absorb higher fuel or food prices with limited disruption, while a family already struggling with housing, food, and energy costs may be forced to sacrifice another necessity.

The cost of war is therefore not simply national; it is social. Those with the least influence over decisions about war do not necessarily experience the smallest consequences. The civilian impact of conflict extends beyond battlefields. An American worker whose purchasing power declines or a family facing higher living costs also becomes part of the economic burden created by war.

Supporters of military action argue that these costs must be weighed against the dangers of inaction. They maintain that failing to confront threats abroad could create greater instability and eventually produce even higher costs. This argument deserves consideration. Governments have a responsibility to protect citizens and maintain the capabilities needed to respond to serious threats.

However, national security cannot be measured only through military strength. Military power is one element of national power, but it depends on other foundations: a productive economy, reliable infrastructure, an educated workforce, effective institutions, and a society with economic stability. The central question is not whether the United States should maintain defense capabilities, but whether military spending always strengthens security or whether excessive commitments can weaken the foundations that make security possible.

This is where militarism becomes a political issue. Militarism is not simply the use of military force; it emerges when military solutions become Washington’s default response to international crises and increases in defense spending are treated automatically as greater security. Under these conditions, domestic priorities are repeatedly delayed while the costs of war become immediate and certain. The opportunity cost of war is therefore not only economic; it reflects how the United States defines security and allocates national resources.

The costs of war also continue after military operations end. Rebuilding weapons stockpiles, maintaining readiness, supporting deployments, and preparing for future conflicts can keep public resources tied to military spending for years. War is therefore not only a short-term decision; it can create long-term commitments that shape national priorities long after fighting stops.

Over time, this dynamic can contribute to a war economy: a cycle in which conflict increases demand for military production, that demand creates contracts and budget commitments, and those commitments make continued military spending politically easier to sustain.

Within this cycle, the role of the defense industry becomes an important democratic question. Greater military demand creates more orders and revenue for defense companies, while the costs are distributed nationally through public budgets and debt. This does not mean defense contracts are inherently corrupt, but it raises a fundamental question: Are the voices that benefit from continued military spending more influential in shaping security priorities than the citizens who ultimately pay for them?

War is therefore not only a foreign policy decision but also a domestic democratic issue. When the costs of conflict are distributed among millions of citizens while decisions about war are made within a limited political circle, accountability becomes part of national security itself. Citizens must be able to evaluate not only whether military operations achieve their goals, but whether their costs are proportionate to their results.

From this perspective, diplomacy should not be viewed merely as a moral alternative to military power. If war creates economic risks, energy instability, and long-term financial burdens, reducing tensions can directly protect national resources. Diplomacy is not a substitute for strength; it is a way to prevent unnecessary costs and avoid cycles of confrontation that consume economic and strategic capacity.

Ultimately, the question is not whether the United States should abandon military power or ignore external threats. The question is whether military power remains a tool for protecting national strength or becomes a substitute for it.

The Iran war has placed this issue before the United States in concrete terms. A country that spends vast resources on war in the name of security must also ask whether those choices strengthen or weaken the society that security is supposed to protect.

National power is not defined only by America’s ability to wage war. It also depends on the economic and social foundations that sustain that ability. If repeated conflicts transfer resources away from infrastructure, healthcare, education, and economic opportunity toward permanent military commitments, the United States may increase its short-term capacity to fight wars while weakening the foundations required to remain strong over time.

A nation that consumes its economic and social capital to preserve its power may finance more conflicts. But eventually it must answer a deeper question: Does it still possess the strong society that this power was originally meant to defend?
 

Yeah, I downloaded the numbers this morning. To say this is horrendous is an understatement. I remember under Boy George the deficit would be $250 billion for the entire year, and that was frightening. The Saudis and Chinese back then could barely fund a part of that.

We're in no man's land now and the end is going to be very very bad. Much of this deficit is being monetized by the Fed, and the real numbers are far worse. And the SPR just fell below 300 million. And we have thieves and maniacs running the government.

 

Could the Crashing Yen Trigger Hyperinflation in the U.S.?​


Guest Post by Mike Whitney


CrashingYenMW.png



A cratering yen has set off alarms on Wall Street and in financial centers around the world. If the Bank of Japan sells its behemoth stockpile US Treasuries (now exceeding $1.2 trillion) to support its sagging currency, the US bond market could go into a nosedive dragging the global economy off a cliff. That is why on Friday, July 31, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent launched an unprecedented currency intervention to prop up the anemic yen and to forestall an impending financial meltdown. Surprisingly, Bessent implemented a euros-for-yen trade via the New York Fed so as not to weaken the dollar or trigger a selloff in bonds. The gravity of the intervention, however, was not lost on jumpy investors who have connected the dots and understand that America’s $40 trillion debt Ponzi is growing increasingly unstable and could trigger another financial crisis. In short, the teetering yen is merely the canary in the coalmine signaling deeper structural issues that could take down the entire dollar-based house of cards. This is from Forbes:

The wobbling Japanese yen could trigger a global financial crisis…. The yen recently reached a 40-year low against the dollar. The fear is that a further fall in the currency’s value will precipitate a crisis of confidence that will not only set off a serious bout of inflation inside Japan…. but also adversely impact financial markets around the world.
That’s why the U.S. and Japan just undertook a very rare joint intervention in currency markets to prop up the yen. In other words, both countries used dollars to buy the yen.​
The intervention has had success. However , most experts believe the relief will be short-lived because of adverse fundamentals in Japan: a too-low short-term interest rate, which is 1% vs. around 3.5% in the U.S.; a national debt that is proportionately twice that of the U.S.; rising energy prices; and a declining and aging population.​
The immediate worry for U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is that in an effort to save the yen from collapse, Japan will start liquidating its $1.1 trillion portfolio of Treasury bonds and bills, not to mention its holdings of German and British bonds. Such sales would put pressure on interest rates. After all, financing our immense budget deficits and refinancing some $7 trillion of our existing debt that’s coming up for renewal are already worrying the markets. This anxiety, for instance, is why the interest rate on our 30-year Treasury bond has reached its highest level in almost 20 years.​
Bessent wants the Federal Reserve to beef up a facility it created in 2020 to deal with a dollar shortage caused by the pandemic and use it now to help the yen. He could also employ a Depression-era facility called the Exchange Stabilization Fund. The idea is that through these devices Japan could borrow dollars using its Treasury holdings as collateral. No sales necessary.​

This help is nice, but there are better, more immediate ways to deal with the crisis. Japan should boost its utterly unrealistic short-term interest rate…. Another important thing that both the U.S. and Japan should do… is to announce that they want a stable rate between the dollar and the yen. They might even give a range of, say, 150 to 155 yen to the dollar and make clear that the two countries would massively intervene in the exchange markets to keep it there. Japan would, if necessary, reduce the supply of yen to keep it in that range. These steps would quash the immediate crisis. Japan’s Wobbling Yen Could Trigger A Global Financial Crisis, Forbes​



The United States and Japan are already massively meddling in the market to scare off short sellers who don’t think market fundamentals support a strong yen. In effect, Bessent is saying that if they bet against the yen, they will be crushed by the combined firepower of the Fed and its ally in Japan. In other words, anyone who invests believing that the market is “free and fair” will be clobbered.

Second, the “facility” to which Forbes refers, is another Fed-generated bailout outfit similar to ones created during the Great Financial Crisis. It is called The Foreign and International Monetary Authorities Repo Facility or FIMA which is operated through the Federal Reserve Bank of New York “To help prop up the yen with dollar loans” in order to discourage Japan from dumping its US debt.

Simply put, it’s a bailout facility. The Fed is issuing dollar-backed loans to prevent the market from rebalancing and to avoid a catastrophic sell-off of US debt that could put the global financial system into downward death spiral.

But will all this meddling work?

Investors don’t think so. Look at this blurb from Reuters:


Fueled by interventions from Tokyo and coordinated action with Washington in recent days, the yen rallied about 4% against the dollar but was not able ‌to reclaim a peak from the previous intervention by the Japanese authorities in May.​
Nearly 95% of about 60 respondents in the July 31-August 5 survey said future Japanese currency interventions alone would not sustainably curb the currency’s weakness. Nearly every respondent who said that also said the Bank of Japan would have to raise interest rates to make a lasting impact….
“Intervention … can be effective in slowing the pace of depreciation, reducing excessive market moves and providing short-term support, but history suggests without a change in the underlying fundamentals, its impact fades relatively quickly,” said Ales Koutny, head of international rates at Vanguard. Reuters

There it is in black and white. They’re going have to raise interest rates which will divert the capital that was going into US Treasuries to Japanese debt instruments. And when America’s Number One buyer of US debt (Japan) starts ditching USTs and purchasing its own sovereign bonds instead, interest rates will rise sharply in the US sending the economy into a protracted slump while ructions in the bond market push the US closed towards insolvency. Here’s more from Leshka at X:

Something much bigger is happening underneath Japan’s financial system. The 2-year government bond yield just reached 1.51%.​
Its highest level since 1995. The 10-year yield climbed toward 2.9%. And Japan’s policy rate is now 1%. Its highest level in 31 years.​
That means the era of nearly free money in Japan is ending. For decades, investors borrowed cheap yen. Then moved that money into:​
U.S. Treasuries. Stocks. Real estate. Crypto. And markets around the world.​
Now borrowing in yen is becoming more expensive. And Japanese bonds are finally offering meaningful returns at home. This creates one enormous risk: Japanese capital no longer needs to stay overseas. If that money starts returning to Japan, the global carry trade begins to unwind. Foreign assets get sold. Bond yields rise. Liquidity leaves risk markets. And volatility spreads everywhere. Japan is already showing signs of panic.
The government spent a record ¥6.28 TRILLION defending the yen in a single day in April. Another intervention worth an estimated $95.5 BILLION may have followed in late July. Yet the yen still collapsed toward ¥164 per dollar before recovering. Intervention is buying time. It is not fixing the underlying problem. And now Japan is trapped between two opposite decisions. Raise rates to defend the yen. Or buy more bonds to stop yields from rising.​
Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi has already urged the Bank of Japan to increase bond purchases when necessary. But more bond buying weakens the yen. While higher rates increase the cost of servicing Japan’s massive debt.
Fix one problem. Make the other one worse.
Monday will not automatically crash global markets. But it will reveal how much larger Japan’s debt burden has become while borrowing costs are hitting multi-decade highs.​
That is the real risk. Leshka.eth


So, are we headed for another Black Monday?

Who knows, but I suspect that analyst Cory Swan might be onto something when he suggests that Bessent and his fellows are pushing us towards hyperinflation followed by the loss of reserve currency status. In fact, it seems almost inevitable now. Check it out:

“…Japan cannot keep defending forever without selling Treasuries or pushing the Bank of Japan into even more extreme measures. The US just showed that it will use other currencies and its own balance sheet to paper over the pressure because a disorderly yen collapse threatens the entire dollar system. That path leads to more dollar printing, more liquidity, more attempts to manage what cannot be managed. Every one of those moves devalues the dollar, the unit of account that still prices nearly everything. @Cory Swan (start at 53 seconds)​

Regardless of what happens on Monday, the nation’s path has already been charted by Soros’s protégé at Treasury (Bessent) and his esteemed colleagues at the Central Bank. The dollar will weaken, the economy will tumble, and the American people will suffer. That much is certain.
 
Yeah, I downloaded the numbers this morning. To say this is horrendous is an understatement. I remember under Boy George the deficit would be $250 billion for the entire year, and that was frightening. The Saudis and Chinese back then could barely fund a part of that.

We're in no man's land now and the end is going to be very very bad. Much of this deficit is being monetized by the Fed, and the real numbers are far worse. And the SPR just fell below 300 million. And we have thieves and maniacs running the government.


Peter Schiff:

The July federal deficit was $432 billion, the largest July deficit on record, up 18% from July 2025. The fiscal-year deficit is already $1.8 trillion with two months remaining (the national debt rose by $2.13 trillion over those ten months), exceeding the entire FY2025 deficit.​



Charlie Bilello:

12.9% of credit card balances in the US are 90+ days delinquent, near the highest since 2011.
10.6% of student loan balances are now 90+ days delinquent, the highest since 2020.
5.5% of auto loan balances are 90+ days delinquent, just off the highest level on record.

7:29 PM · Aug 11, 2026 236.5K Views



Oof - 56 cents of every dollar that the gov't spent last month was borrowed...

 
Peter Schiff:

The July federal deficit was $432 billion, the largest July deficit on record, up 18% from July 2025. The fiscal-year deficit is already $1.8 trillion with two months remaining (the national debt rose by $2.13 trillion over those ten months), exceeding the entire FY2025 deficit.​



Charlie Bilello:

12.9% of credit card balances in the US are 90+ days delinquent, near the highest since 2011.​
10.6% of student loan balances are now 90+ days delinquent, the highest since 2020.​
5.5% of auto loan balances are 90+ days delinquent, just off the highest level on record.​



Oof - 56 cents of every dollar that the gov't spent last month was borrowed...


Couple that with the fact that the war in Iran is also impacting the bond market, the cost to service that debt is only going to get more expensive.
 
Couple that with the fact that the war in Iran is also impacting the bond market, the cost to service that debt is only going to get more expensive.
Like those outlay charts show above, interest expense on the debt is now the 2nd or 3rd largest price tag in our budget, now over $1.1 trillion per year. And as you said, we're rolling over that debt at much higher interest rates than originally.

We're borrowing money to pay the interest (not even the principal!) on previously borrowed money. That's about as bad as it gets.
 

WSJ now reports that Trump essentially knows he’s lost​



... Underscoring Trump's troubles are reports that US’s top general Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine believes that the US, essentially, has no further options in Iran left and that a face-saving off-ramp is necessary to prevent disaster:



https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/07/politics/general-dan-caine-off-ramp-iran-war
Over the last few weeks, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Gen. Dan Caine has privately made clear to other top Trump advisers that the US needs to find an off-ramp from the war with Iran — because the military options on the table to escalate the conflict could backfire and airpower alone is unlikely to achieve President Donald Trump’s stated objectives, according to three sources familiar with the matter.

“Caine is looking for an off ramp,” one of the sources said bluntly.

In light of this, Trump has told reporters the US is now “low-keying” it in Iran, which is euphemism for avoiding a humiliating large-scale attempt at subduing Iran, and instead pursuing economic pressure because it allows him to maintain the illusion that US has some kind of initiative via control over Hormuz.



https://www.axios.com/2026/08/09/trump-iran-interview
“We are only semi-negotiating with them. We are just watching Iran with its huge inflation and the fact they have no money.”

[Trump] stressed that Iran “is in very bad shape” economically and has no money to pay its troops.
The U.S. naval blockade has exacerbated the Iranian regime’s economic crisis, Trump said.
Trump has characterized the US’s putative control of Hormuz as an impenetrable “wall of steel”, despite earlier admitting that there may be some pesky mines preventing skittish carriers from sending ships through:



Many other connected experts have expressed the opposite—that there is no evidence much oil is flowing through the Omani route which Trump alleges to be facilitating with his tin wall:



WSJ now reports that Trump essentially knows he’s lost and is willing to walk away from the Iran war even without a nuclear deal, as long as Iran is kind enough to reopen the Strait of Hormuz that has become the bugbear of his entire presidential legacy.

From the article:

WASHINGTON—For weeks, President Trump had been laying the groundwork to declare victory in the Iran war should Tehran fully reopen the Strait of Hormuz, even floating the idea privately to senior aides that he’s willing to walk away without a nuclear deal, U.S. officials said.

But that scaled-back objective became more difficult when Iran insisted Saturday on its highest price yet for permitting the free flow of traffic in the waterway, seeking billions of dollars in U.S. payments, the removal of American troops from the region and an end of the U.S. naval blockade, among other things.

They go on to note that Iran recognizes Trump’s dilemma and is deliberately making the costs ever higher to prevent Trump from taking a face-saving bow-out, given that Iran now has all the cards and controls the entire play:

“Iran’s recent hardline demands for reopening the strait make it increasingly difficult for the president to manufacture a face-saving off-ramp from the conflict,” said Mona Yacoubian, director of the Middle East program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington think tank.

Gregory Brew, an Iran expert at the Eurasia Group consulting firm, said, “The Iranians fully believe Trump wants out and is focused on opening the strait, which is why they are playing hardball.”
With midterms coming up and gas prices still through the roof, Trump is running out of time in the game of chicken against the adversary he has “destroyed” five times over.

Now, with less than three months until the midterm elections and the price of gasoline still much higher than it was before the war started in late February, Trump has been looking for ways to tell the American public that the war is won.
One supposes the “nuclear dust” will again be deemed of no importance.

For Iran, its victory in the war has inaugurated a whole new phase of national development:



An IRGC representative stated that Iran’s ballistics are now being manufactured faster than they’re being fired, and that Iran can sustain the war indefinitely:

A senior IRGC adviser said Wednesday that all Iranian weapons, ammunition and equipment are now domestically produced, that ballistic missiles are being manufactured faster than they are being fired, and that Iran could sustain the war for years.

Brigadier General Mohammad Reza Naghdi, senior adviser to the IRGC commander-in-chief, told state television that the “factor of our victory in the war with America is the power of our faith.”

As part of the new doctrine Iran is reportedly opening the possibility of taking the war to “enemy soil”, perhaps in a sense mirroring Ukraine’s recent strategy vis-a-vis Russia:



Revolutionary Guard Adviser Warns Iran Is Preparing Military Operations on US Soil as Hormuz Peace Talks Crash
Iran new military doctrine tasks IRGC to attack enemy in its soil

TABNAK, Aug. 12 – Iran’s IRGC must be able to take the war into enemy lands, a senior commander said Wednesday, adding that the IRGC had been ordered to build the capability for offensive operations beyond the country’s borders.

Things could not be going worse for Trump’s Hormuz sideshow.



https://www.economist.com/interactive/trump-approval-tracker
With the Economist showing record low approval in latest polls amidst increasingly humiliating optics, one can’t help but wonder how much longer Trump can put on his Leslie Nielsen act.



Are you not entertained?
 
as long as Iran is kind enough to reopen the Strait of Hormuz that has become the bugbear of his entire presidential legacy.
LOL... Another fake news story from WSJ..

News Flash, the Strait is open, and many ships have been passing through, EVERY DAY..... Just NOT Iranian ships....

1786636121705.png
 
LOL... Another fake news story from WSJ..

News Flash, the Strait is open, and many ships have been passing through, EVERY DAY..... Just NOT Iranian ships....

View attachment 616221
It doesnt matter how many times you say this, it doesnt make it true.


In the past 24 hours there has been 17 transits. Of those more than half we inbound. Prior to Trumps war it was over 130/day.

Even more important than the number is the ship type/cargo. Total of 950k barrels of oil total, 82kt of LNG. The rest are bulk carriers.

Chris Wright is about as honest as Hegseth's reporting of casualties.
 
Lost in the sauce and assuming (yeah I know) that the intel that kicked this all off was correct, what would today look like with a "confirmed" 12er nuclear armed regime running Iran that makes Kim and company in Pyongyang look "contained"?....
 
In the past 24 hours there has been 17 transits.
So, that means the Strait is closed completely, right??? Oh, wait....

Prior to Trumps war it was over 130/day.
LOL... wrong again, dude. It was around 88/day.

And, in your haste to post incorrect information, apparently you MISSED this important part at the top of the page:

Data advisory: Widespread GPS/AIS jamming linked to the conflict has degraded ship position reporting across the Strait since mid-July; some vessels appear misplaced, delayed, or transit with transponders off. Detection compensates by inferring transits, but crossing counts and export estimates should be read as conservative lower bounds.

1786638274207.png

What else do you have from CNN,MSDNC,NYT?
 
So, that means the Strait is closed completely, right??? Oh, wait....
Its funny that you love arguing so much that you fantasize conversations that never occurred outside your skewed inner monologue. I didn't say that it was...

LOL... wrong again, dude. It was around 88/day.


What else do you have from CNN,MSDNC,NYT?

Hurr durr!
 
Lost in the sauce and assuming (yeah I know) that the intel that kicked this all off was correct, what would today look like with a "confirmed" 12er nuclear armed regime running Iran that makes Kim and company in Pyongyang look "contained"?....

Most of that intel came from this guy.

 
Have ANY ships sailed the other direction in the Strait for the last 5 months?
Have all the trapped ships now exited?
 
In the past 24 hours there has been 17 transits.
Let's see if I can help you a bit more, since you seem to not read the warnings on links you post.

What's the chance these ships, when being escorted by the Navy, turn off their AIS transponders, so your number is way low, as they can't be tracked? Any possibility?

Use of AIS in the Strait of Hormuz​

Purpose of Turning Off AIS​

Ships often disable their Automatic Identification Systems (AIS) while navigating through the Strait of Hormuz. This practice is primarily aimed at avoiding detection by Iranian forces, particularly in contested maritime areas. The decision to turn off AIS is driven by security concerns amid escalating tensions in the region.

Navy Escort and AIS Status​

When ships are escorted by the Navy, the situation regarding AIS can vary. The U.S. Navy has been involved in guiding vessels through the Strait, but there have been instances where ships still choose to turn off their AIS for added security. This is particularly true in high-risk areas where Iranian forces are active.

Disabling AIS is a common practice among vessels in the Strait of Hormuz, especially under the current geopolitical climate.
cydome.io skuld.com
Of those more than half we inbound.
Wait, so you're telling me ships went outbound, unloaded their freight, then turned around to go back in, for another load?

What a economic concept!! Isn't Capitalism wonderful!!

Chris Wright is about as honest as Hegseth's reporting of casualties.
I'm sure your Liberal "sources" know so much more about the daily activity in the Strait, compared to Chris Wright getting it directly from the Navy and directly from the pumping companies, right?

Hey, do your Liberal "sources" have any good stock tips, that we all can make some money on?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top