GOV/MIL Freedom Caucus Posts Rotating Guard To Block Sneaky Leadership Moves

Plain Jane

Just Plain Jane

Freedom Caucus Posts Rotating Guard To Block Sneaky Leadership Moves​


BY TYLER DURDEN
FRIDAY, APR 19, 2024 - 01:45 PM
In a sign of growing discord among House Republicans, members of the Freedom Caucus are taking turns monitoring the House floor to prevent the GOP leadership from using sneaky procedural tactics to sap the power of increasingly rebellious conservatives.

Specifically, they're wary that party leaders and their allies will, without prior announcement, bring measures to the floor and seek their passage via "unanimous consent." With that approach, the presiding officer simply states, "If there is no objection, the motion will be adopted." After a pause to allow for objections, the officer declares, "Since there is no objection, the motion is adopted."

View: https://twitter.com/RepThomasMassie/status/1781174917372735982?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1781174917372735982%7Ctwgr%5E62862966c29b2bdfe41d6e9825e86eff66a71732%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Fpolitical%2Ffreedom-caucus-posts-rotating-guard-block-sneaky-leadership-moves


That's where the Freedom Caucus's Floor Action Response Team (yes, "FART") comes in. With their round-the-legislative-clock presence, they always have a member positioned to object to unanimous consent motions, forcing proposals to go through a more arduous procedure.

House conservatives both inside and outside the Freedom Caucus are increasingly irate over Speaker Mike Johnson's actions, from pushing foreign aid for Ukraine, allowing omnibus spending bills that kick the fiscal can down the road, and personally casting the tie-breaking vote against adding a warrant requirement to the extension Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. All the while, he's pushed border security to the back burner.

The Freedom Caucus and its allies are on particular alert for moves that would reverse concessions made by Johnson's predecessor, Kevin McCarthy, as part of his negotiations with conservatives pursuant to ascending to the speakership. For example, establishment Republicans could try to:

  • Remove three conservatives from the powerful Rules Committee, which exerts a variety of controls over the flow of legislation through the House, and is therefore in position to expedite or thwart the progress of a bill. The targeted conservatives are Thomas Massie (KY), Chip Roy (TX) and Ralph Norman (SC), Politico reports.
  • Raise the required number of members who must back a motion to oust the speaker before it can be put to a vote. Today, it only requires one. Last month, Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene filed such a "motion to vacate the chair." On Tuesday, Massie announced he would co-sponsor the motion, telling Johnson to his face, "You're not going to be speaker much longer."
View: https://twitter.com/lawler4ny/status/1780765564702531787?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1780765564702531787%7Ctwgr%5E62862966c29b2bdfe41d6e9825e86eff66a71732%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Fpolitical%2Ffreedom-caucus-posts-rotating-guard-block-sneaky-leadership-moves


After a tense meeting with Johnson, Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz, who introduced the successful motion to oust McCarthy, issued a public warning against changing the rules. “Talking about changing the threshold to the motion to vacate is likely to induce the motion to vacate,” he told reporters.

Greene issued her own admonition: "Mike Johnson owes our entire conference a meeting. And if he wants to change the motion to vacate he needs to come before the Republican Conference that elected him and tell us of his intentions and tell us what this rule change … is going to be.”


Johnson has been deflecting questions about whether he was contemplating such a move, both with media and with Gaetz and others. When Gaetz was asked on Thursday if he would back a motion to vacate, he hinted that he was moving in that direction, coyly saying, "You know I woke up today and I didn't." At the same time, he said Johnson's ouster would be "sub-optimal," and that he'd prefer to see Johnson come around and "govern in accordance with the commitments we made."

Gaetz marveled at Johnson's rapid conversion to establishment puppet once the gavel was in his hand:

"When we voted for Mike Johnson for speaker, he was fresh off of a vote against Ukraine aid, he was publicly advocating for a warrant requirement on FISA, and the central thesis of his campaign for speaker was single-subject spending bills...[Now] look where we are."
View: https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1780995946605629935?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1780995946605629935%7Ctwgr%5E62862966c29b2bdfe41d6e9825e86eff66a71732%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Fpolitical%2Ffreedom-caucus-posts-rotating-guard-block-sneaky-leadership-moves
 

Magdalen

Veteran Member
I appreciate the Freedom Caucus's attempt at thwarting Congress (a delaying action at best). But, I do not understand congressional procedure (all the writhing in the snake pit makes clarity impossible!), nor do I understand whether or not removing Johnson will result in a Democrat (Hakeem Jeffries) taking the gavel and then doing more egregious damage than Johnson is already doing. Does anyone have any insight?
 

Wildweasel

F-4 Phantoms Phorever
I appreciate the Freedom Caucus's attempt at thwarting Congress (a delaying action at best). But, I do not understand congressional procedure (all the writhing in the snake pit makes clarity impossible!), nor do I understand whether or not removing Johnson will result in a Democrat (Hakeem Jeffries) taking the gavel and then doing more egregious damage than Johnson is already doing. Does anyone have any insight?
If the Reps blow it and make Jeffries the Speaker, I expect the Dems to call for a vote for a new Speaker and we'll see Pelosi return to power.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
Jeffries will never give the gavel back to Pelosi
The only point of bulldozing a Democrat speaker of the house would be to control and pass legislation "quantifying" insurrection (which is specifically mentioned in the Constitution) so they can apply it to Donald Trump and refuse to certify his election.

I mean they're going to have to pass the intellectual hurdle of the SCOTUS declaring many J6 Defendants who have been charged under the "obstruction statutes" as "non-applicable" (The Obstruction law related to destruction of paperwork pertinent to a Congressional investigation and a SCOTUS decision clearing many if not most of the J6 Defendants AND Donald Trump of this law is expected) AND the "Ex-Post-Facto Law" that a new law would create in the Trump case.

Of course the other side of this is a few RINO will vote to non-certify Trump ANYWAY. But with Jeffries leading the pack MANY MORE Democrats may "defect" - the fix is SO plain - and won't play well with the constituency.

Well, one hopes. If wishes were horses - they would be ME.

Dobbin
 

pinkelsteinsmom

Veteran Member
The guy is a rabid zionist Mike pence fake christian. I knew he was a rino traitor and so did many others?! Trump is an idiot when it comes to discerning a patriot from a "pence".
 
Last edited:
Top