DEEP STATE Fmr AG Holder: 'Additional Justices' Needed on Supreme Court if Trump Appointment Confirmed

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
www.breitbart.com /clips/2020/09/19/fmr-ag-holder-additional-justices-needed-on-supreme-court-if-trump-appointment-confirmed/

Fmr AG Holder: 'Additional Justices' Needed on Supreme Court if Trump Appointment Confirmed
Jeff Poor
2-2 minutes

Saturday, during an appearance on MSNBC’s “PoliticsNation,” former Attorney General Eric Holder told host Al Sharpton if Republicans succeeded in confirming a replacement for Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg appointed by President Donald Trump, a future Democrat Senate majority along with Joe Biden, if he is elected president, should consider “court reform.”

According to Holder, such a measure would mean adding justices to the Supreme Court.

“You would put in place — if this is allowed to happen, a 6-3 court,” he said. “And with all the issues you have talked about, you would have a conservative majority — or illegitimate conservative majority on the court ruling on the matters that will affect the nation for generations to come. One of the realities is if Merrick Garland had been confirmed, as he should have been, there would have been a progressive majority for the past three years. And think what about that meant. So I think if, if in fact, they are successful in placing a justice on the court, I think that what Democrats have to do, assuming that Biden is president and there is a Senate majority for the Democrats, we need to think about court reform. And at a minimum, as part of that reform package, I think additional justices need to be placed on the Supreme Court.”

Follow Jeff Poor on Twitter @jeff_poor
 

cetansa

Senior Member
A.H. Holder needs more excercise - give him a free trip to the Caribbean and then push him out the plane between US and Gitmo- Mfr can swim the rest of the way or be eaten by his kind - Sharks. Hell send good ol Al along with him. Good God lets make it a trifecta and send JJ (jesse Jack) for the ride too.
 

kite

Contributing Member
Eric Holder, former US Attorney General and consummate lying douchebag deserves a full roundhouse swing of a Louisville Slugger upside the head. I'm visualizing a Gallagher watermelon explosion.
Dante's ninth level of hell (treachery) is where this despicable creature belongs, frozen in ice for eternity next to Judas Iscariot.
 

SSTemplar

Veteran Member
Go for it. That sounds just like the kind of busywork Democrats need to keep them from interfering with the real work.
 

OldMan

Candy’s dandy, but a back rub is quicker.
There seems to be a flaw (among others) in the Constitution insofar it did not specify the number of justices on the Supreme Court. Hence the efforts over time to increase the number of SC justices and immediately nominate political patsies to fill the new positions.

Assuming (!!!) Trump will be re-elected and both the Senate and House will be controlled by the Repubs, I suggest they pass legislation to add a new constitutional amendment to specify the number of SC justices to be nine (9) and the procedure(s) to follow when a SC vacancy occurs.
 

bluelady

Veteran Member
Yeah, a liberal friend put, "RIP, RGB ... Expand SCOTUS ... Save Democracy" as her Facebook profile. There are at least several things wrong with that...LOL! I had to look up "Expand SCOTUS"; apparently it's been a thing since FDR at least.
 

bbbuddy

DEPLORABLE ME
Packing the court... do the commies think only they can pack the court? PDJT should do it right now! Then get the legislature to pass a law saying no more Justices. Of course that would only work if people are smart enough to throw out the commies from the house.
 

Raggedyman

Res ipsa loquitur
from the OP . . .
"Fmr AG Holder" . . . . dey mus be talkin 'bout Eric "MY PEOPLE" Holder . . . wasn't relavent when his incompetent ass filled the AG post - DAMN SURE ain't relevant now . . .
 

Squib

Veteran Member
He should keep his pie hole shut if he knows what’s good for him...

He’s going to be dealt with eventually for his crimes and treason...don’t bring it all down on your head any sooner than it needs to be!
 

Daytonabill0001

Wheat or Tare, which are you?
There seems to be a flaw (among others) in the Constitution insofar it did not specify the number of justices on the Supreme Court. Hence the efforts over time to increase the number of SC justices and immediately nominate political patsies to fill the new positions.

Assuming (!!!) Trump will be re-elected and both the Senate and House will be controlled by the Repubs, I suggest they pass legislation to add a new constitutional amendment to specify the number of SC justices to be nine (9) and the procedure(s) to follow when a SC vacancy occurs.
That's a tough hurdle to cross because after that, you have to send the exact amendment to the states to vote on and then they have to send the exact bill back as passed. If a dot or letter or comma is changed, then that state's reply is supposed to be rendered invalid.
That is why the income tax is lawfully illegal. Too many states sent back altered copies of the original bill back as passed and the Sec of State really didn't have enough yes votes from the states (because of invalid copies of the amendment) and declared it passed and the 16th amendment was passed fraudulently.
 
Top