ALERT Federal Court of Appeals just issued a temporary halt to Biden’s vaccine mandate, Texas Governor Abbott announces.

CaryC

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Thanks.

The injunction I mentioned in another thread, end result unknown.

I assume this is nationally, since the mandate is nationally.
 

jward

passin' thru
Federal Court of Appeals issues temporary halt to Biden’s vaccine mandate
November 06, 2021 12:11 PM in News - AP Texas Headlines


Photo Credit: MGN Online/Arne Müseler / CC BY-SA 2.0
The Federal Court of Appeals filed a temporary halt to President Biden’s vaccine mandate, Gov Greg Abbott announced Saturday.
The vaccine mandate orders big businesses to require vaccination against the virus among their employees by Jan. 4 or require regular testing.
BREAKING: The Federal Court of Appeals just issued a temporary halt to Biden’s vaccine mandate.

Emergency hearings will take place soon.

We will have our day in court to strike down Biden’s unconstitutional abuse of authority. pic.twitter.com/8utmU05vw3
— Greg Abbott (@GregAbbott_TX) November 6, 2021

RELATED: Texas AG Ken Paxton sues Biden administration over new COVID-19 vaccination rules for big businesses
The new federal rules preempt state and local laws, including part of Gov. Greg Abbott’s statewide ban on vaccine mandates. Texas filed a lawsuit on Friday against the mandate.
“Emergency hearings will take place soon,” Abbott said in a tweet. “We will have our day in court to strike down Biden’s unconstitutional abuse of authority.”
This is a developing story. Check back for updates.
 

jward

passin' thru
United States
U.S. federal appeals court freezes Biden's vaccine rule for companies
By Mike Scarcella

A woman holds a small bottle labeled with a Coronavirus COVID-19 Vaccine sticker and a medical syringe in front of displayed USA flag in this illustration taken, October 30, 2020. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic

A woman holds a small bottle labeled with a "Coronavirus COVID-19 Vaccine" sticker and a medical syringe in front of displayed USA flag in this illustration taken, October 30, 2020. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic

WASHINGTON, Nov 6 (Reuters) - A U.S. federal appeals court issued a stay Saturday freezing the Biden administration's efforts to require workers at U.S. companies with at least 100 employees be vaccinated against COVID-19 or be tested weekly, citing "grave statutory and constitutional" issues with the rule.

The ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit comes after numerous Republican-led states filed legal challenges against the new rule, which is set to take effect on Jan 4.

The White House declined to comment on the ruling, and referred questions to the Labor Department, where spokespeople did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The stay comes two days after the Biden administration unveiled the rule, which was immediately met with vows of legal action from Republican governors and others, who argued it overstepped the administration's legal authority. read more

The action on the private-sector vaccinations was taken under the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) emergency authority over workplace safety, officials said. The rule applies to 84.2 million workers at 1.9 million private-sector employers, according to OSHA.

Saturday's court order came in response to a joint petition from several businesses, advocacy groups, and the states of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina and Utah. The rule is also facing separate legal challenges before other courts. read more

The two-page order directs the Biden administration to respond to the request for a permanent injunction against the rule by 5pm Monday.

Reporting by Mike Scarcella, writing by Pete Schroeder Editing by Alistair Bell
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

 

CTFIREBATTCHIEF

Veteran Member
God Bless Texas and the other Republican governors and attorney's general who fired this salvo. I know they had to wait until something was actually on paper, but now that pudding cup's lapdogs went and done put it to paper, here comes the pushback..

This "thing of Ours " Our Constitution, either it means everything, or it means NOTHING.. Friggin SCROTUS had better be paying attention. This overreach has to be stopped butt cold and a stake driven through it's heart.

If" joey depends" likes to come off as an angry old man in news conferences, well then let the American people and the judicial branch give the incompetent traitorist bastard something to be pissed off ABOUT. I want this worthless SOB to be sooo damned pissed off every morning when he wakes up, that it makes his heart do circles in his chest.

Lets rock!!
 

jward

passin' thru

Matt

Veteran Member
The courts are absolutely corrupt. This is false hope... like flowers to a beaten wife the morning after. The crushing blow awaits like the next drunken bender!
 

jward

passin' thru
United StatesU.S. federal appeals court freezes Biden's vaccine rule for companies
By Mike Scarcella



2 minute read

WASHINGTON, Nov 6 (Reuters) - A U.S. federal appeals court issued a stay Saturday freezing the Biden administration's efforts to require workers at U.S. companies with at least 100 employees be vaccinated against COVID-19 or be tested weekly, citing "grave statutory and constitutional" issues with the rule.
The ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit comes after numerous Republican-led states filed legal challenges against the new rule, which is set to take effect on Jan 4.

In a statement, Solicitor of Labor Seema Nanda said the Labor Department was "confident in its legal authority" to issue the rule, which will be enforced by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).
"The Occupational Safety and Health Act explicitly gives OSHA the authority to act quickly in an emergency where the agency finds that workers are subjected to a grave danger and a new standard is necessary to protect them," she said. "We are fully prepared to defend this standard in court.”

An average of about 1,100 Americans are dying daily from COVID-19, most of them unvaccinated. COVID-19 has killed roughly 750,000 people in the United States.
U.S. President Joe Biden gestures as he delivers remarks on the importance of COVID-19 vaccine requirements, during a visit at a Clayco construction site, in Elk Grove Village, Illinois, U.S. October 7, 2021. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein

U.S. President Joe Biden gestures as he delivers remarks on the importance of COVID-19 vaccine requirements, during a visit at a Clayco construction site, in Elk Grove Village, Illinois, U.S. October 7, 2021. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein/File Photo

U.S. President Joe Biden gestures as he delivers remarks on the importance of COVID-19 vaccine requirements, during a visit at a Clayco construction site, in Elk Grove Village, Illinois, U.S. October 7, 2021. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein

1/2
U.S. President Joe Biden gestures as he delivers remarks on the importance of COVID-19 vaccine requirements, during a visit at a Clayco construction site, in Elk Grove Village, Illinois, U.S. October 7, 2021. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein/File Photo

The stay comes two days after the Biden administration unveiled the rule, which was immediately met with vows of legal action from Republican governors and others, who argued it overstepped the administration's legal authority. read more

The action on the private-sector vaccinations was taken under OSHA's emergency authority over workplace safety, officials said. The rule applies to 84.2 million workers at 1.9 million private-sector employers, according to OSHA.
The administration's various vaccine rules cover 100 million employees, about two-thirds of the U.S. workforce, according to the White House.
Saturday's court order came in response to a joint petition from several businesses, advocacy groups, and the states of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina and Utah. The rule is also facing separate legal challenges before other courts. read more
The two-page order directs the Biden administration to respond to the request for a permanent injunction against the rule by 5 p.m. Monday.
Reporting by Mike Scarcella, additional reporting by Jarrett Renshaw and Pete Schroeder; writing by Pete Schroeder Editing by Alistair Bell
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
 

CaryC

Has No Life - Lives on TB
What other thread?
One of the other threads that was talking about the mandate, and that nothing could be done, and even with the courts involved it would take years to resolve.

I just mentioned that the courts could issue an emergency injunction to halt the jab, until it could be heard even years from now in a decision, one way or the other. And it seems they did.

What the decision will be, or where it goes now is still up for grabs.

I haven't heard of anything covering them, but would very much like to be wrong.
I would just make a note that Federal Employees are on a different level of authority than private businesses. The EO has all the authority it needs to effect them. Sad to say. And this "stay" only applies to the EO instructing OSHA to make up a mandate concerning private businesses and their workers safety.

In my understanding OSHA decides what practices a company makes to insure the workers safety. Like hard hats, steel toe shoes, and safety glasses, harnesses when working high, etc... This level of intrusion puts the safety of the workers on the workers, pretending it is placing it on the company.

I have worked with a bunch of unsafe employee's and the company firing them for their unsafe practice, would be a lawsuit in the making. In which OSHA would have no standing.

But I'm not a lawyer and what I say matters little to the elite.

Also IMHO the unconstitutional parts of this hinge on an EO enforced through OSHA. Where the enforcement seems to appear to be a "law" which can only come through the Legislature, not EO's. An EO on private business seems to be UNconstitutional. If that even matters today.
 
Also IMHO the unconstitutional parts of this hinge on an EO enforced through OSHA. Where the enforcement seems to appear to be a "law" which can only come through the Legislature, not EO's. An EO on private business seems to be UNconstitutional. If that even matters today.
Where does the EUA rules come into place. Namely the jab cannot be forced, coerced, gun to your head, etc.
informed consent...
 

CTFIREBATTCHIEF

Veteran Member
Where does the EUA rules come into place. Namely the jab cannot be forced, coerced, gun to your head, etc.
informed consent...
I guess and am hopeful that now the lawsuits are flying, we will at some point find this all out. The feds can sound as self assured as they want to be that "this is all settled and we are on good legal ground" but now you have states asserting their rights to the federal government.

grab the popcorn kids, its gonna get real
 

Knoxville's Joker

Has No Life - Lives on TB
What is going to happen is an OSHA inspector or three will incur harm up to and including fatality and at that point OSHA will re-evaluate the enforcement options. At this point there is enough division and hate it could go to a hot stand off with lead involved. We do not want things to get to that point.
 

All4liberty

Senior Member
To me there are three parts. Federal employees to which the EO applies to. OSHA applies to private business but not to state employees.
 

Old Gray Mare

TB Fanatic
I'm not good with legalese. Does this also apply to DoD civilians? Or just regular businesses that employ over 100 people?
NO. The court's ruling doesn't effect the DOD's requirement to get the shot. DH just received his second. Anything happens to him... I leave the fatherless welps forcing this on to our military and those working for the military to the Judgment of our Lord. May his judgement be swift and Just.
 

goosebeans

Veteran Member
NO. The court's ruling doesn't effect the DOD's requirement to get the shot. DH just received his second. Anything happens to him... I leave the fatherless welps forcing this on to our military and those working for the military to the Judgment of our Lord. May his judgement be swift and Just.

Thank you. Will pray for your husband, that he has no ill effects, OGM! Our son, very reluctantly, took the J&J about three weeks ago, just to get it over with. I know what's done is done but I'm literally worried sick over it. :
 

xtreme_right

Veteran Member
White House tells businesses to proceed with vaccine mandate despite court-ordered pause


White House tells businesses to proceed with vaccine mandate despite court-ordered pause
Spencer Kimball

U.S. President Joe Biden delivers remarks on the authorization of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccine for kids ages 5 to 11, during a speech in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building’s South Court Auditorium at the White House in Washington, November 3, 2021.
Evelyn Hockstein | Reuters
The White House on Monday said businesses should move forward with President Joe Biden’s vaccine and testing requirements for private businesses, despite a federal appeals court ordering a temporary halt to the rules.
“People should not wait,” White House Deputy Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters during a briefing. “They should continue to move forward and make sure they’re getting their workplace vaccinated.”
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, considered one of the most conservative appellate courts in the country, halted the requirements Saturday pending review, writing that “the petitions give cause to believe there are grave statutory and constitutional issues with the Mandate.”
The Republican attorneys general in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina and Utah, as well as several companies, requested the pause. They argued that the requirements exceed the authority of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, which will enforce the mandates, and amount to an unconstitutional delegation of power to the executive branch by Congress.
In its response Monday evening, the Biden administration asked the court to lift the pause, dismissing the states’ and companies’ claims of harm as “premature” given that the deadlines for vaccination and testing are not until January. The administration claimed that pausing the requirements “would likely cost dozens or even hundreds of lives per day” as the virus spreads. The Labor and Justice Departments also argued that OSHA acted within its authority as established by Congress.
The court-ordered pause came a day after the requirements went into effect, starting the countdown for businesses with 100 or more employees to ensure their staff have received the shots required for full vaccination by Jan. 4. After that date, unvaccinated workers must submit a negative Covid-19 test weekly to enter the workplace. All unvaccinated workers must start wearing face masks indoors at their workplaces starting Dec. 5.
Republican attorneys general in at least 26 states have challenged Biden’s vaccine and testing requirements in five different U.S. appeals courts since last Friday. The Republican National Committee said it has also challenged the requirements in the D.C. Court of Appeals.
It’s unclear which court will ultimately decide the case. When multiple petitions are filed in at least two courts, the cases are consolidated in one of those courts through a lottery system. The Justice Department said in a filing Monday that the lottery is expected take place on or around Nov. 16. The Biden administration, in its response Monday, said the courts should not rule until the jurisdiction for the consolidated case has been selected.
David Vladeck, a professor of law at Georgetown University, said there’s a “high probability” that the case will end up before the Supreme Court.
“There are justices on the court who want to rein in the administrative state and this is a case in which those concerns are likely to come to the fore,” Vladeck told CNBC.
OSHA, which polices workplace safety for the Labor Department, developed the vaccine and testing requirements under emergency authority established by Congress. That authority allows the agency to shortcut the process to issue workplace safety standards, which normally takes years.
The Labor Department’s top lawyer, Seema Nanda, said on Friday that the Biden administration is “fully prepared to defend this standard in court.”
Nanda said the law “explicitly gives OSHA the authority to act quickly in an emergency where the agency finds that workers are subjected to a grave danger and a new standard is necessary to protect them.”
Nanda also said the vaccine and testing requirements supersede “any state or local requirements that ban or limit an employer’s authority to require vaccination, face-covering, or testing.” Texas Gov. Greg Abbott issued an executive order last month banning vaccine mandates in the Lone Star State.
OSHA emergency workplace safety standards have a mixed track record in court. Prior to the vaccine requirements, the agency had issued 10 such standards in its 50-year history. Courts halted or overturned four of those standards, and a fifth was partially vacated.
More than 750,000 people have died in the U.S. from Covid since the pandemic began, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. More than 1,100 people a day die from Covid, and more than 71,000 people a day are newly infected, according to data from Johns Hopkins University.
“If that’s not a grave danger, I don’t know what else is,” Jean-Pierre told reporters Monday.
 

John Green

Veteran Member
What is scary is that this is hardly being discussed on the news or Twitter. Even so called conservative sites.
Blatant disregard from the Administration of the Courts. We are so screwed!
 
Top