WoT February 11 - Live Event - Center for Security Policy "Defeat Jihad" Summit

Ragnarok

Ragnarok

On and On, South of Heaven
Those of you who caught their last event will want to watch this one. This is a GREAT line-up of speakers they have scheduled:

-Texas Sen. Ted Cruz
-Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal
-Former Attorney General Michael Mukasey
-Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich
-Dutch parliamentarian Geert Wilders
-Britain’s Lord Malcolm Pearson
-Former House Intelligence Committee Chairman Pete Hoekstra
-Danish free speech advocate Lars Hedegaard
-Former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy

Here is the last one for a refresher:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLrSFSDm38o

CSP - Defeat Jihad Summit
securefreedomstrategysidebar.png




Jordan’s King Abdullah II showed decisive leadership this week when he committed his nation to defeating ISIS after it executed a Jordanian pilot by burning him alive. Abdullah didn’t mince words. He didn’t care that European leaders would condemn him for ordering the execution of two ISIS terrorists in response to the killing of his pilot. The King pledged stepped-up airstrikes and to attack ISIS until his military “runs out of fuel and bullets.”

Journalists, Obama officials and Obama supporters have tried to portray King Abdullah’s statements as a turning point in the battle against ISIS. Some said this indicates the Arab world will finally unite to defeat ISIS. Others suggested the Jordanian military will begin dealing major defeats to ISIS.

The sad reality is that unless the United States comes up with a coherent strategy to defeat the global jihad movement and ISIS, nothing has changed. Jordan’s increased airstrikes will do little to affect ISIS which cannot be defeated without ground troops engaging it in Syria. Although Jordan has a large, well-armed professional military, it is not about to conduct a ground invasion of Syria to battle ISIS.

A comprehensive military campaign to defeat ISIS is impossible as long as President Obama refuses to acknowledge the enemy. America needs a strategy to defeat ISIS, its radical ideology and the Shariah doctrine it seeks to impose on the world through violence. The Center for Security Policy recently issued an important publication detailing a U.S. government strategy to defeat this threat, “The Secure Freedom Strategy: A Plan for Victory Over the Global Jihad Movement.” Click HERE to read this strategy.

On February 11 from 9 AM to 2 PM, the Center will sponsor “The Defeat Jihad Summit” as a counterpoint to the Obama administration’s February 18 “Countering Violent Extremism” summit. This program will discuss the nature of the Islamist threat, an assessment of U.S. policies to confront it, and better approaches to defeat it. Among those participating will be Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, former Attorney General Michael Mukasey, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, Dutch parliamentarian Geert Wilders, Britain’s Lord Malcolm Pearson, former House Intelligence Committee Chairman Pete Hoekstra, Danish free speech advocate Lars Hedegaard, and former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy. Click HERE for details. This event will be live-streamed on the Center for Security Policy website from 9 AM to 2 PM on February 11th.
http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy....s-needed-to-defeat-the-global-jihad-movement/
 
Z

zeker

Has No Life - Lives on TB
gotta watch this.. the first one (posted above) is a real eye opener. which leads to believe that Obama has his eyes closed.

sadly I think the the "secure freedom strategy" will go the way of steven greer's disclosure of UFOs

it will be minimized to 'a buncha half baked crackpots trying to stir up shyt'
 
Be Well

Be Well

may all be well
zeker said:
gotta watch this.. the first one (posted above) is a real eye opener. which leads to believe that Obama has his eyes closed.

sadly I think the the "secure freedom strategy" will go the way of steven greer's disclosure of UFOs

it will be minimized to 'a buncha half baked crackpots trying to stir up shyt'
Click to expand...

I can't believe people still think 0vomit is ignorant about the dangers of Islamic jihad.

He promotes jihad, he sides with Moslems whether he's a practicing one or not! He's making all his decisions (well, he and his handlers) ON PURPOSE!!!! When will people get this/??!@?!?!?
 
Ragnarok

Ragnarok

On and On, South of Heaven
Bump...

I'll try to keep thi son main for a few days so everyone can mark their calendar.

Seriously, I keep getting the feeling that no one is taking this too serious in the U.S., yet.

65 views?
 
Be Well

Be Well

may all be well
Ragnarok said:
Bump...

I'll try to keep thi son main for a few days so everyone can mark their calendar.

Seriously, I keep getting the feeling that no one is taking this too serious in the U.S., yet.

65 views?
Click to expand...

I figure it can be viewed later even though not live?

I think it's too cerebral for a lot of people... not instant enough. But it seems to me as though a bit of change in the air - bigger names in the US are taking a stand about the evil of Islamic jihad.
 
Ragnarok

Ragnarok

On and On, South of Heaven
Be Well said:
I figure it can be viewed later even though not live?

I think it's too cerebral for a lot of people... not instant enough. But it seems to me as though a bit of change in the air - bigger names in the US are taking a stand about the evil of Islamic jihad.
Click to expand...

Yeah... I'm sure it will be on youtube after a day or so.

Me... I'm kinda stoked to hear what Geert has to say!
 
Be Well

Be Well

may all be well
More people ARE waking up to the danger of Islamic theology as the basis for terrorism, and every voice that keeps shouting is helping.
 
C

cjoi

Veteran Member
Be Well said:
I can't believe people still think 0vomit is ignorant about the dangers of Islamic jihad.

He promotes jihad, he sides with Moslems whether he's a practicing one or not! He's making all his decisions (well, he and his handlers) ON PURPOSE!!!! When will people get this/??!@?!?!?
Click to expand...

^^^^^^^THIS

(Except that for starters, he does practice to the extent that during Ramadan he doesn't wear his watch or wedding ring from the Indonesian guy, and you can bet that the WH kitchen puts on the feasts after sunset.
Returning Churchill's bust (he was strongly anti-Muslim) was like vampires getting rid of Holy Water. You can probably think of other ways he's clearly Islam-observant that the MSM have censored or glossed over.)
 
Ragnarok

Ragnarok

On and On, South of Heaven
cjoi said:
^^^^^^^THIS

(Except that for starters, he does practice to the extent that during Ramadan he doesn't wear his watch or wedding ring from the Indonesian guy, and you can bet that the WH kitchen puts on the feasts after sunset.
Returning Churchill's bust (he was strongly anti-Muslim) was like vampires getting rid of Holy Water. You can probably think of other ways he's clearly Islam-observant that the MSM have censored or glossed over.)
Click to expand...

Yes...

Yes, I can.

Muslim Brotherhood Linked to Malik Obama and Obama Admin
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnew...herhood-linked-to-malik-obama-and-obama-admin

Obama’s Half-BrotherPhotographed Wearing Hamas Scarf That Proclaims: ‘Jerusalem Is Ours – WE ARE COMING’
Malik_Group_Yemen_2010-e1390824575456.jpg

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/201...at-proclaims-jerusalem-is-ours-we-are-coming/

Muslim Brotherhood Expert: Obama’s Brother Malik Obama a ‘War Criminal and Terrorist’
http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/02/m...s-brother-malik-obama-war-criminal-terrorist/

So... Does that mean anything? Is Obama even still in contact with his brother?

Pictures speak louder than words:

barack-malik-obama-in-oval-office_thumb.jpg


Malik_Barack-e1368617079409.jpg


MalikObama.jpg


Now...

It gets REALLY interesting:

Obama's brother linked to Muslim Brotherhood
Report says Malik directs radical Islamic movement's investments
http://www.wnd.com/2013/08/obamas-brother-linked-to-muslim-brotherhood/

IRS official Lerner speedily approved exemption for Obama brother’s ‘charity’
http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/14/irs-official-lerner-approved-exemption-for-obama-brothers-charity/

IRS stalled conservative groups, but gave speedy approval to Obama foundation
http://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...c53e8a-be57-11e2-89c9-3be8095fe767_story.html

BARACK H. OBAMA FOUNDATION (BHOF)
The Barack H. Obama Foundation (BHOF) was established in 2008 by Abon'go Malik Obama, the half-brother of U.S. President Barack Obama.
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/funderprofile.asp?fndid=5420&category=79

“Lost” Lois Lerner Emails to White House May Be About Obama’s Brother
http://www.dcclothesline.com/2014/06/15/lost-lois-lerner-emails-white-house-may-obamas-brother/

Tax-exempt charity of Obama’s half-brother is a fraud
http://www.dcclothesline.com/2013/0...y-of-obamas-half-brother-is-a-complete-fraud/

Obama's Brother, Malik Obama, Directly Tied To Muslim Brotherhood & Lois Lerner Helped Provide Him Tax Exempt Status
http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/b...-lerner-helped-provide-him-tax-exempt-status/

Confirmed: IRS Gave Preferential Treatment to Malik Obama – Who Is Linked to Hamas
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...atment-to-malik-obama-who-is-linked-to-hamas/


What does all of this mean?

The President of the United States of America is DIRECTLY funding Islamic terror organizations ( The Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas ) laundered through a tax exempt "charity" ( We all know about those Islamic "charities" ) set up by his half-brother.

Put that in your pipe and smoke it...
 
Be Well

Be Well

may all be well
cjoi said:
^^^^^^^THIS

(Except that for starters, he does practice to the extent that during Ramadan he doesn't wear his watch or wedding ring from the Indonesian guy, and you can bet that the WH kitchen puts on the feasts after sunset.
Returning Churchill's bust (he was strongly anti-Muslim) was like vampires getting rid of Holy Water. You can probably think of other ways he's clearly Islam-observant that the MSM have censored or glossed over.)
Click to expand...

Well, supposedly practicing moslems aren't homosexuals, although it's okay to sodomize young boys; but 0vomit's just a regular homo. I have seen photos of him drinking beer, that's a no no, and apparently eating pork. But then it's okay to violate some moslem rules if you're pushing jihad, I think that's a moslem rule.
 
Be Well

Be Well

may all be well
What does all of this mean?

The President of the United States of America is DIRECTLY funding Islamic terror organizations ( The Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas ) laundered through a tax exempt "charity" ( We all know about those Islamic "charities" ) set up by his half-brother.

Put that in your pipe and smoke it...
Click to expand...

And another reason to give such preferential treatment to Malik Obama is that he knows 0vomit is not really his half brother nor the son of the Kenyan, so he needs to be paid big $ to keep that to himself....
 
Ragnarok

Ragnarok

On and On, South of Heaven
Lord Pearson: " We are constantly told that the jihadi's are a tiny minority. My question then is, What are the great majority doing? "

Former FBI Agent and Founder of 'Understanding the Threat': " There are over 2100 Islamic Centers in the United States and 80-85% were founded by the Muslim Brotherhood. It is not reality to say the vast majority do not support sharia. "

Congressman ( Didn't catch his name ): " The president's request for war powers is just a political statement, a means to an end, to get through the next two years. It will have no effect on the larger issue. "

General Boykin: " This new request is a 'bait-and-switch' that cancels out two current authorizations that are broader in scope and limits us to ISIS, specifically. "

Diana West: " We need immigration policy that will defend us against creeping sharia policy. "

This full page ad scheduled for release in the Washington Times was displayed:

aob75y.jpg

http://www.scribd.com/doc/255384857/Why-is-Boston-a-Hub-For-VIOLENT-EXTREMISM
 
Ragnarok

Ragnarok

On and On, South of Heaven
General Boykin: " We can't just hold our leaders accountable, we have to understand what is going on and encourage others to stand up and make a stand. We need to hold ourselves accountable, too. "

Admiral Lyons: " We have had many opportunities to stop this and we failed every time. It started with Carter... " ( A GREAT HISTORY LESSON ENSUES BEGINNING AT THE 2:05:00 MARK. MUST LISTEN! )

Admiral Lyons: " The Obama administration has a strategy. It's very simple, any thinking American should be able to grasp it... It's anti-American, anti-western, it's pro-Islamic, and pro-Muslim Brotherhood. "
 
Ragnarok

Ragnarok

On and On, South of Heaven
Bump...

With the embassy bug-out and the marines that may come under fire...

FOLKS, YOU NEED TO CARVE OUT THE TIME!!!
 
Ragnarok

Ragnarok

On and On, South of Heaven
Andrew McCarthy: " We are regressing on every front because we refuse to take up the challenge of the ideology. "

Andrew McCarthy: " If you want to get an idea of the problem, look at Mohammad Morsi, who destroyed Egypt in about eighteen months. He was radicalized in the Unites States as part of the Muslim Students Association in California... "

Andrew McCarthy: " The Muslim Brotherhood through IAT, CAIR, ISNA, MSA, IIIT are implementing a strategy that is no secret> They have been talking about it since the 1920's... "

Senator Ted Cruz: " I appreciate this conference being assembled to address the growing plague facing the world... And by that I mean, the crusades... "

Senator Ted Cruz: " I don't think it's too much to ask fro the president to stay focused on the current millennium. Let's be clear on something, if there were Christians torturing and murdering those who disagreed with their faith in order to impose their faith on others, I and the men and women gathered here would not hesitate to speak out. "

Senator Ted Cruz: " In the prayer breakfast, which I attended, the president said something every bit as troubling as the moral relativism of analogism what is happening now to the crusades. He said that you cannot have freedom of religion without free speech but he then said when someone exercises their free speech to criticize the faith of another we should all condemn it. I found that a rather stunning assault on free speech by the president... It got very little press attention... What that is saying is that Charlie was wrong to put a cartoon of Muhammad in their magazine. What that is saying is the terrorists who murdered those journalists had a legitimate grievance. That is wrong.

Senator Ted Cruz: " I am a Christian an I found Piss Christ offensive but no one sought to kill that artist. Right now on Broadway a play called the Book of Mormon is ridiculing the Mormon faith, last I checked, Mitt Romney didn't show up trying to blow up the stage. It is not a permissible response for anyone of any faith to say, 'If you disagree with or make fun of my faith... I will murder you.' "

Senator Ted Cruz: " I asked General Dempsey what would be required, militarily, if the objective were to destroy ISIS? The General's response was we cannot destroy ISIS until we change the reality on the ground that make young men in poverty susceptible to terrorism... Now, there is a technical term for such things... It is NONSENSE! The solution to ISIS is not eradicating poverty throughout the Middle East, the solution to ISIS is not expanded Medicaid in Iraq...
 
Ragnarok

Ragnarok

On and On, South of Heaven
Notes from a Defeat Jihad Summit
By Diana West, Feb. 13, 2015:



Earlier this week, I participated in the Center for Security Policy’s Defeat Jihad Summit.

I find that the several hours of speeches and discussion have distilled into some salient recollections and comments.

1) There remains a chasm between American “messaging” and that of some of our European friends who were invited to speak, including the Netherlands’ Geert Wilders, who contributed a taped message, and Lars Hedegaard, who addressed the conference via Skype from Denmark.

American participants in the main demand, even a little truculently, that we now, finally, break the bonds of “political correctness” and speak frankly about “radical Islam,” “Islamism,” “ideas of ISIS,” etc.

Wilders, whose Party for Freedom is No. 1 in the Dutch polls, and Dispatch International editor Hedegaard both speak, and have always spoken about “Islam” — pure and very simple.

Indeed, Wilders has encapsulated everything you need to know about Islam and the West thus: “The more Islam there is in a society, the less freedom there is.”

Not “Islamism.”

This difference is more than semantic.

The primary mechanism of control that Islam exerts over people is Islamic slander law, Islamic blasphemy law. This is the institutional means by which Islam protects itself against criticism, even objective facts about Islam that might be construed critically. The penalty is death. Not for nothing did Yusef Qaradawi state that Islam wouldn’t even exist without the death penalty for “apostasy.” We have seen innumerable instances, particularly since the 1989 publication of Salman Rushdie’sSatanic Verses, where Muslims have executed, or tried to execute this death sentence even against non-Muslims, from Europe to Japan, in efforts to extend the rule of Islam.

When American lawmakers, generals and security experts omit “Islam” from their debates and war councils, focusing instead on what they have dubbed “radical Islam,” “Islamism” and the like, they are succombing to this same control mechanism. They are protecting Islam. They are themselves sheltering Islam against the cold light of analysis. By extension, they are also preventing their own Western societies from devising means of defense against Islamization. They are accepting and carrying out what is probably the most important Islamic law.

There is concrete danger in this. Unless we can come to an understanding that it is the teachings of Islam — not the teachings of some peculiar strain called “Islamism,” or of an organization such as the Muslim Brotherhood or ISIS — that directly undermine our constitutional liberties, we cannnot protect our way of life from these teachings, whose popularity grows with the increasing Islamic demographic. This is what the advanced Islamization of Europe shows us. A nominally sensible US immigration policy would immediately halt Islamic immigration to prevent a sharia-demographic from gaining more critical mass in the USA, democratically.

Then again, we don’t have a national border, much less a sensible immigration policy. That means many of these questions are moot.

2) Still, it bears noting: The Left has responded to the current cycle of Islamic jihad — a recurring blight on civilization, as Andrew Bostom’s Legacy of Jihad amply documents — by inventing a foe called “violent extremism.” The Right, scoffing at this euphemism, “pinpoints” the threat of “radical Islamism.”

What is the difference? Ultimately, I see none. Both terms protect Islam. Warning against the dangers of “radical Islam” implies that there exists some “normal Islam” that is completely compatible, perhaps even interchangeable, with Christianity and Judaism. Indeed, this ongoing effort to normalize Islam is equally as dangerous as the institutional efforts that long ago “normalized” Communism. This officially began when FDR “normalized” relations with the wholly abnormal Soviet regime in 1933, a morally odious event whose horrific repercussions are treated at length in American Betrayal.

Just as it required endless apologetics (lies) to maintain the fiction of “normal” Communism, so, too, does it require endless apologetics (lies) to maintain the fiction of “normal” or “moderate” Islam. According to all of Islam’s authoritative texts, according to the example of Islam’s prophet, this “moderate” creed does not Islamically exist.

To turn the notion around, as Lars recently reminded me, when the brave and splendid ex-Muslim Wafa Sultan was asked several years ago to distinguish between “Islam” vs. “Islamism” at a Copenhagen conference, she brought the airy theory back to earth by asking: Based on your definition of Islamism, was Mohammed a Muslim or an “Islamist”?

3) This brings me to The Best Line of the summit, which was spoken by Lars Hedegaard: “Islamism is Islam and Islam is Islamism.”

4) The Spirit of ’76 Award goes to retired Admiral James “Ace” Lyons who inquired of guest speaker and former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich whether there was any movement in the Congress to censure Obama or initiate impeachment hearings. The consensus on this burning, patriotic question is, no, expediently speaking, there is not nor will there be such a movement. As per the entire US elite’s corruption and complicity in Soviet crime outlined in American Betrayal, it seems we have arrived at the point where Obama’s political judge and jury — our elected representatives in the Congress — is surely complicit in his crimes against the Constitution, as well as with his identity fraud on the American people.

5) The Most Profound New Thought of the summit came from brave and splendid ex-Muslim Nonie Darwish (who, bonus, I met for the first time here).

Nonie conveyed her understanding, having grown up in Egypt the privileged daughter of an Egyptian shahid (martyr), that terrorism, the threat of terrorism is a feature of Islamic life at all levels: inside the family, in the public square, and everywhere in between. I’m paraphrasing, but what came through her talk was the idea that Muslim “moderates” in Islamic society (which I am taking to mean human beings who do not have the seeds of violence within them) have come to take Islamic terrorism/violence/coercion as a given. This means that they have come to accept such terrorism/violence/coercion as normal. Her great fear is that Americans, too, are coming to accept such Islamic violence as normal — that we, in a sense, are taking on the role of such Muslim moderates. This is, if it can be imagined, an even darker iteration of dhimmitude.

6) Speaking of ex-Muslims, I made a comment about the role of the apostate in the great ideological battles of our time. Today, it is the ex-Muslims who offer special insight into totalitarianism of the Islamic kind. Many of my American colleagues, however, still prefer to lean on guidance from Muslim “moderates” — despite the fact, referenced above, that Islam’s own sacred texts, including the example of Islam’s prophet, support no such “moderation.” As they wish, they may await, or even themselves lead an Islamic reformation, but this in no way protects free speech or preserves public safety in our country now — especially when there are indicators that an alarming level of support for curbing and even criminalizing free speech about Islam exists among American Muslims — punitive measures, again, that find support in Islam’s texts.

In the 20th-century-battle against totalitarian Communism, anti-Communists did not embrace “moderate Communists.” Rather, they embraced ex-Communists who understood the totalitarian teachings and practices of Communism in Moscow’s gangster-quest for global dominance — a “caliphate” a la Lenin & Marx. It was mainly the Left and Center — the anti-anti-Communist Left and Center — that made common cause with “moderate Communists,” i.e., Social Democrats, Communist apologists, also Soviet agents among others, engendering meaningless treaties, defeats and loss. Even more pernicious, though, was the resulting “postmodern” rot across the political spectrum, which tells me, as I argue in American Betrayal, that the West lost the “struggle of ideas” in the “Cold War.”

This spectral shift is interesting in and of itself. I see its patterns repeat in the past decade of military disaster in which it was US military strategy to ignore the teachings of Islam and instead lean on perceived Muslim moderates, or just bank on a hoped-for emergence of Muslim moderation, in the Islamic nations of Iraq and Afghanistan. Terrible defeats ensued.

As former FBI special agent John Guandolo pointed out at the summit, we’ve tried this type of thing for 15 years and it doesn’t work.

Nor does it make sense — logically, doctrinally, strategically. But then neither does seizing on “radical Islamism” and other terms of art that exclude and thus protect Islam.

The Moral of this summit: You can’t protect Islam and defeat jihad at the same time.
http://www.dianawest.net/Home/tabid...Defeat-Jihad-Summit.aspx#.VN6iOmWl9Jc.twitter
 
Ragnarok

Ragnarok

On and On, South of Heaven
Michael Mukasey at Defeat Jihad Summit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=duHaUuJAcio

Gen. Jerry Boykin at Defeat Jihad Summit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4rRjGvTMQu8

Gov. Bobby JIndal at Defeat Jihad Summit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRuNTI1SzZs

Rep. Scott Perry at Defeat Jihad Summit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ktjYzguct4E

Rep. Mike Pompeo at Defeat Jihad Summit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=773bic46tmE

Rep. Steve King at Defeat Jihad Summit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LxETcZzkMc

Lord Pearson at Defeat Jihad Summit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkCdJ6H_1NY

Sen. Ted Cruz at Defeat Jihad Summit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mkVwDSoSyNM

Andrew McCarthy at Defeat Jihad Summit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peNkOk0btwY

Pete Hoekstra at Defeat Jihad Summit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ia6X8anaeFk




Newt Gingrich at Defeat Jihad Summit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWPu9V9lvLY
 
Be Well

Be Well

may all be well
Bumping for those who want to hear and didn't get a chance. Also so I can find tomorrow to listen.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top