CRIME FBI executes search warrant at Fulton County elections office near Atlanta

S

Sub-Zero

Veteran Member
Plain Jane said:
theconservativetreehouse.com

Virginia Senator and SSCI Vice Chairman, Mark Warner, is Very Concerned About Tulsi Gabbard - The Last Refuge

Senator Mark Warner is the vice-chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI). In his position he is also a member of the intelligence community oversight group known as the “Gang of Eight.” Senator Mark Warner replaced Senator Dianne Feinstein in 2017 for his SSCI position...
theconservativetreehouse.com theconservativetreehouse.com

Virginia Senator and SSCI Vice Chairman, Mark Warner, is Very Concerned About Tulsi Gabbard​

January 29, 2026 | Sundance | 135 Comments
Senator Mark Warner is the vice-chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI). In his position he is also a member of the intelligence community oversight group known as the “Gang of Eight.” Senator Mark Warner replaced Senator Dianne Feinstein in 2017 for his SSCI position. Dianne Feinstein’s former chief-of-staff Dan Jones was a central participant in the 2016 Trump-Russia targeting effort.

Senator Warner moved into position in 2017 to sit at the center of the legislative branch effort to support the targeting and removal of President Trump. Warner ran cover for the actions in 2016 and worked to construct the fraudulent narrative after President Trump took office. On March 17, 2017, shortly after 4:00pm, Senator Mark Warner entered the senate SCIF with SSCI Security Director James Wolfe to review the Title-1 search warrant used against U.S. citizen Carter Page. The ‘read and return’ documents were delivered by FBI special agent Brian Dugan. James Wolfe took 82 pictures of the FISA application (one picture per page) and then sent them to Buzzfeed journalist Ali Watkins. ¹{Background}

Mid-March 2017 Senator Mark Warner was trying to support the appointment of a special counsel to target President Trump, his directed leak was to support that objective. Three days later, March 20, 2017, FBI Director James Comey appeared before congress and admitted the FBI was investigating Donald Trump. Senator Warner then used his position as SSCI vice-chair to advance the DC legislative efforts against President Trump.

Senator Mark Warner is very concerned about Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, being in Fulton County, Georgia, yesterday when the search warrant for election records was carried out. Senator Mark Warner is very concerned.

R/T 54 seconds

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2016893658671218879
View: https://twitter.com/MarkWarner/status/2016893658671218879?ref_src
Click to expand...
Who's the "we" you're talking about, kemosabe? You're on your own.

BOHICA, mf'er!
 
P

Plain Jane

Just Plain Jane
theconservativetreehouse.com

Senate Intelligence Committee Demand Answers About DNI Tulsi Gabbard's Ongoing Reviews of Govt Activity - The Last Refuge

Apparently, the Senate and House intelligence committees are very concerned about what Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard is doing. Almost every tweet from Senator Mark Warner in the past 48 hours has been about DNI Tulsi Gabbard. What seems to worry them the most is that they don’t...
theconservativetreehouse.com theconservativetreehouse.com

Senate Intelligence Committee Demand Answers About DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s Ongoing Reviews of Govt Activity​


January 30, 2026 | Sundance | 41 Comments
Apparently, the Senate and House intelligence committees are very concerned about what Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard is doing. Almost every tweet from Senator Mark Warner in the past 48 hours has been about DNI Tulsi Gabbard.
What seems to worry them the most is that they don’t know exactly what she is doing. Triggered by Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) Vice-Chairman Mark Warner, the Democrats are now demanding Director Gabbard tell them her intentions and her itinerary so they can monitor her activity. Tulsi Gabbard continues to review internal government activity without consulting them.




“Director Gabbard recognizes that election security is essential for the integrity of our republic and our nation’s security. As DNI, she has a vital role in identifying vulnerabilities in our critical infrastructure and protecting against exploitation,” a DNI spokesperson noted. “We know through intelligence and public reporting that electronic voting systems have been and are vulnerable to exploitation. President Trump’s directive to secure our elections was clear, and DNI Gabbard has and will continue to take actions within her authorities, alongside our interagency partners, to support ensuring the integrity of our elections,” the DNI spokesperson said.

R/T 0:51

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017360392725606500
View: https://twitter.com/ODNIgov/status/2017360392725606500?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2017360392725606500%7Ctwgr%5Ec65c808e283fc40f66f722e333ea7dc850b0df74%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftheconservativetreehouse.com%2Fblog%2F2026%2F01%2F30%2Fsenate-intelligence-committee-demand-answers-about-dni-tulsi-gabbards-ongoing-reviews-of-govt-activity%2F


Thursday evening while attending the premier of ‘Melania’ at the Kennedy Center, President Trump said, “you’re going to see some interesting things happening. They’ve been trying to get there for a long time.”

According to the Wall Street Journal:

[…] “[Tulsi Gabbard] has begun studying information about voting machines, analyzed data from swing states and pursued theories that President Trump has promoted to claim the 2020 election was unfairly taken from him, the officials said, particularly on foreign government interference.

She has regularly briefed Trump and chief of staff Susie Wiles about her inquiry in recent months along with others involved in the investigation. Those include senior Justice Department officials, Trump’s outside ally and lawyer Cleta Mitchell and Kurt Olsen, a lawyer who pushed claims in 2020 that the election was stolen and joined the administration as a special government employee.

Gabbard has consulted with others in the intelligence community about claims of foreign interference in the 2020 election, the officials said, though she hasn’t provided the public with new evidence of it.

She is expected to prepare a report on her work, the people said. The administration has discussed executive orders on voting ahead of the midterm elections, two of the officials said.

[…] Democrats criticized Gabbard’s election effort. “Either Director Gabbard believes there was a legitimate foreign intelligence nexus—in which case she is in clear violation of her obligation under the law to keep the intelligence committees ‘fully and currently informed’ of relevant national security concerns—or she is once again demonstrating her utter lack of fitness for the office,” said Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the intelligence committee. (more – paywall)

There are a lot of interconnected aspects to all of this, many circle around the Intelligence Community’s prior and current involvement in various operations against the interests of the Office of the President.

As noted by Paul Sperry: “In a letter, ex-CIA chief John Brennan’s lawyer said his client has “complied” w/ a fed grand jury subpoena seeking, among other things, materials related to his role in creation of the Obama-ordered ICA on Russia + Trump covering the period from July 1, 2016 to Feb 28, 2017.”

Most people are not aware how the 2016/2017 CIA work product known as the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) ties directly into the 2019 impeachment effort against President Trump for the Ukraine phone call with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

A key architect of the 2017 ICA was a CIA analyst on Russian issues named Eric Ciaramella. The anonymous CIA whistleblower who facilitated the 2019 impeachment effort was the same Eric Ciaramella.

DNI Tulsi Gabbard previously released information showing how the 2017 ICA was fraudulently constructed, and now DNI Gabbard has reviewed the transcribed testimony of former Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson, where he described how he gained authority to change the CIA rules to permit Ciaramella to remain anonymous in 2019. All of this ties together.

[VIA Politico] – […] Sen. Mark Warner, (D-Va.), the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, argued on X Wednesday that there “are only two explanations” for Gabbard’s presence in the raid.

“Either Director Gabbard believes there was a legitimate foreign intelligence nexus — in which case she is in clear violation of her obligation under the law to keep the intelligence committees ‘fully and currently informed’ of relevant national security concerns — or she is once again demonstrating her utter lack of fitness for the office that she holds by injecting the nonpartisan intelligence community she is supposed to be leading into a domestic political stunt designed to legitimize conspiracy theories that undermine our democracy,” he wrote.

Warner and House Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.) wrote to Gabbard Thursday to request briefings for both panels about the legal basis, scope, and justification of her participation in the raid. (more)

DNI Tulsi Gabbard continues to work on behalf of the American people; that seems to have triggered Senator Mark Warner.

The need for control is a reaction to fear.
 
B

Ben Sunday

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Against all hopes for justice I suspect that nothing will happen beyond this GA episode.

My guess? A smart ass Fed judge (or a SCOTUS Red like Kagan or Sotamayor) will throw it out claiming no legal standing or a technical failure or anomaly with the search warrant.

Please folks, don't get your hopes up.
 
Macgyver

Macgyver

You also got your last Timebomb. Well that sucks.
www.thegatewaypundit.com

EXCLUSIVE: Atlanta Field Office Special Agent in Charge Allegedly Removed For Slow-Walking Election Fraud Investigation * The Gateway Pundit * by Brian Lupo

Reports are emerging on social media that Paul Brown, the FBI Special Agent in Charge at the Atlanta Field Office, was "forced out of that job earlier this…
www.thegatewaypundit.com www.thegatewaypundit.com

Atlanta Field Office Special Agent in Charge Allegedly Removed For Slow-Walking Election Fraud Investigation

FBI agents in tactical gear engage in discussion on an airplane, showcasing a serious law enforcement situation.
Reports are emerging on social media that Paul Brown, the FBI Special Agent in Charge at the Atlanta Field Office, was “forced out of that job earlier this month,” according to MSNOW’s Ken Dilanian.

According to MSNOW, Brown “was forced out this month after questioning the Justice Department’s renewed push to probe Fulton County’s role in the 2020 election” after “expressing concern” about “unsubstantiated allegations of voter fraud” in Fulton County.

On Thursday, The Gateway Pundit published a 26-count report that was shared with the Department of Justice. The document allegedly details extensive acts of maladministration and evidence destruction in Fulton County related to the 2020 election. The publication maintains that the claims are supported by citations and corroborating materials, countering Dilanian’s characterization of them as “unsubstantiated.”

The Gateway Pundit has received an FBI letter purportedly sent in response to the 26-count report. The letter, addressed to Fulton County Elections Director Nadine Williams, was signed by Special Agent in Charge Brown and requested that the county “voluntarily produce” election materials from 2020, including:

paper ballots
ballot envelopes
voter “tallie” sheets
batch “tallie” sheets
tabulator “pole” tapes
tabulator “pole” tapes
documents related to tabulator “pole” tapes.
FBI request letter for Fulton County Board of Elections to provide records related to the November 2020 elections, including ballots and voter records.
Sources familiar with the matter stated that Brown’s removal may have been linked to dissatisfaction within the Justice Department over how he handled the response to the 26-count report. Instead of pursuing a probable cause search warrant, Brown reportedly opted to send the request letter. The letter followed multiple prior efforts spanning several years to obtain the same election materials.

Notably, the letter contained several typographical errors, including “tallie” in place of “tally” and “pole” instead of “poll.” It also lacked a date of origin and, more concerningly, did not include a compliance deadline for Director Williams.

Previous efforts to obtain Fulton County election records include a formal request from then-Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, three subpoenas issued by the Georgia State Election Board (SEB) associated with an ongoing complaint investigation, and multiple lawsuits seeking access to physical ballots and related records. One of these cases has reportedly been awaiting a hearing for more than 1,100 days since being remanded to a lower court by the Georgia Supreme Court.

Earlier this month, a Georgia Superior Court judge ordered Fulton County to comply with one of those subpoenas; however, it notably did not include the physical ballots.

The source noted that the FBI has acted diligently and professionally in the investigation since Brown’s ouster.
 
King Samson

King Samson

I'm Here
Ben Sunday said:
Ask yourself....what has the DOJ accomplished towards resolution of the issues that face us???

I'm not putting anything down. I AM trying to be realistic.
Click to expand...
OH, come on, stop being a Debbie Downer...

We all know the files are "sitting" on Blondi's desk.... Yup... she'll get right on them....... (some century)..... :shkr:

After all, she's been in her position for a year, and had a few months even before being confirmed, to prepare and attack everything we already knew... see all the results she (hasn't) achieved.
 
mistaken1

mistaken1

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Macgyver said:
www.thegatewaypundit.com

EXCLUSIVE: Atlanta Field Office Special Agent in Charge Allegedly Removed For Slow-Walking Election Fraud Investigation * The Gateway Pundit * by Brian Lupo

Reports are emerging on social media that Paul Brown, the FBI Special Agent in Charge at the Atlanta Field Office, was "forced out of that job earlier this…
www.thegatewaypundit.com www.thegatewaypundit.com

Atlanta Field Office Special Agent in Charge Allegedly Removed For Slow-Walking Election Fraud Investigation

FBI agents in tactical gear engage in discussion on an airplane, showcasing a serious law enforcement situation.
Reports are emerging on social media that Paul Brown, the FBI Special Agent in Charge at the Atlanta Field Office, was “forced out of that job earlier this month,” according to MSNOW’s Ken Dilanian.

According to MSNOW, Brown “was forced out this month after questioning the Justice Department’s renewed push to probe Fulton County’s role in the 2020 election” after “expressing concern” about “unsubstantiated allegations of voter fraud” in Fulton County.

On Thursday, The Gateway Pundit published a 26-count report that was shared with the Department of Justice. The document allegedly details extensive acts of maladministration and evidence destruction in Fulton County related to the 2020 election. The publication maintains that the claims are supported by citations and corroborating materials, countering Dilanian’s characterization of them as “unsubstantiated.”

The Gateway Pundit has received an FBI letter purportedly sent in response to the 26-count report. The letter, addressed to Fulton County Elections Director Nadine Williams, was signed by Special Agent in Charge Brown and requested that the county “voluntarily produce” election materials from 2020, including:

paper ballots
ballot envelopes
voter “tallie” sheets
batch “tallie” sheets
tabulator “pole” tapes
tabulator “pole” tapes
documents related to tabulator “pole” tapes.
FBI request letter for Fulton County Board of Elections to provide records related to the November 2020 elections, including ballots and voter records.
Sources familiar with the matter stated that Brown’s removal may have been linked to dissatisfaction within the Justice Department over how he handled the response to the 26-count report. Instead of pursuing a probable cause search warrant, Brown reportedly opted to send the request letter. The letter followed multiple prior efforts spanning several years to obtain the same election materials.

Notably, the letter contained several typographical errors, including “tallie” in place of “tally” and “pole” instead of “poll.” It also lacked a date of origin and, more concerningly, did not include a compliance deadline for Director Williams.

Previous efforts to obtain Fulton County election records include a formal request from then-Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, three subpoenas issued by the Georgia State Election Board (SEB) associated with an ongoing complaint investigation, and multiple lawsuits seeking access to physical ballots and related records. One of these cases has reportedly been awaiting a hearing for more than 1,100 days since being remanded to a lower court by the Georgia Supreme Court.

Earlier this month, a Georgia Superior Court judge ordered Fulton County to comply with one of those subpoenas; however, it notably did not include the physical ballots.

The source noted that the FBI has acted diligently and professionally in the investigation since Brown’s ouster.
Click to expand...
So Special Agent Brown gave them a warning on what needs to be shredded. Got it.
 
BadMedicine

BadMedicine

Would *I* Lie???
He should tell his DHS troops to apprehend ANY & ALL LEOS seen :aiding and abetting terrorists" for not doing their job when violence/damage happens in their vivinity/ presence. If you aren't fighting the crime, you ARE THE CRIME. Take gun, badge, uniform, perpwalk, HIGH BAIL, courtdate.

Yo either FOR LAWS, or you ain't. But no more stealing & lyin.
 
vector7

vector7

Dot Collector
Gen Mike Flynn: BREAKING 2026 MidTerm election update!

This may be ANECDOTAL only but it is an important indicator nonetheless.

I’m being told voter turnout was horrible in this election cited below.

Numbers in 2022 midterms were 288,000. Yesterday turnout was 94,000.

Why (from people on the ground)?

No ACCOUNTABILITY = No SHOW at the polls.@realDonaldTrump this is bad.

You, me, all of us are in trouble if / when the left regains the political winds of WDC.
@GOP @TexasGOP @SpeakerJohnson @SusieWiles

POLITICAL EARTHQUAKE in Tarrant County, Texas, the biggest red county in the country. Democrat Taylor Rehmet beats Republican Leigh Wambsganss in state senate district that Trump carried in 2024 by 17 points. The district hasn’t voted Democratic in half a century.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2018009607973527706
View: https://twitter.com/johnstonj75/status/2018009607973527706
 
vector7

vector7

Dot Collector
Rudy Giuliani Drops 2020 BOMBSHELL amid FBI Raids in Fulton County, Reveals EVIDENCE of a ‘Ballot Factory’, BURNED hundreds of thousands of Ballots in Cover-Up

“We were absolutely certain that they had a factory in Georgia three blocks away from the area in which they were printing up the ballots they needed…”

“I think it’s definitively proven that he won Georgia, that he won Wisconsin, that he won Pennsylvania.”

“I know that 300,000 or so were burned…”
RT 4min
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2018405953306026162
View: https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/2018405953306026162
 
Dobbin

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
vector7 said:
POLITICAL EARTHQUAKE in Tarrant County, Texas, the biggest red county in the country. Democrat Taylor Rehmet beats Republican Leigh Wambsganss in state senate district that Trump carried in 2024 by 17 points. The district hasn’t voted Democratic in half a century.
Click to expand...
Today's Bannon War Room discussed this turn.

NOT ONE MENTION of the possibility of fraud in the balloting. The "expert" brought in for discussion put it largely up to "Republican apathy" while the Democrats are "reading the writing on their political wall," and acting upon their fears.

Bannon has always claimed to be "not a machine man." (i.e. fraud not done in the machines) Instead claiming the "mail-in ballots" were the primary fraud in 2020. I know Dominion threatened Bannon with a Defamation lawsuit - but I don't believe it ever came about.

Likely he remains "sensitive" to the possibility.

Google AI:
Based on the provided search results, there is no direct evidence of a specific legal threat, lawsuit, or demand letter sent by
Dominion Voting Systems directly to Steve Bannon.
However, the search results indicate the following context regarding Bannon and Dominion:
  • Broad Legal Campaign: Dominion has launched widespread defamation lawsuits against various individuals and media outlets—such as Fox News, Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell, and Mike Lindell—for spreading conspiracy theories about their voting machines.
  • Bannon's Role: Steve Bannon has been a prominent amplifier of 2020 election denialism and has featured guests on his podcast, "War Room," who promoted conspiracy theories about Dominion and other voting systems.
  • Other Legal Threats: While not specifically Dominion, Bannon has faced significant legal pressure, including being indicted for contempt of Congress (January 6 panel) and facing criminal charges related to his media activities.
The provided documents mention Dominion taking action against those who spread false claims, particularly focusing on those who, as stated in the lawsuits, "consciously set out to establish" that fraud existed.
Click to expand...

Dobbin
 
Last edited:
B

Ben Sunday

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Did anyone happen to catch the news crawler on CNN last evening. The headline stated that Todd Blanche at DOJ "did not expect further arrests in the Epstein case"

Even worse, it was claimed that DOJ was downplaying the Georgia Elections investigation and the work by Tulsi Gabbard on that case.
 
vector7

vector7

Dot Collector
President Trump just said something is ABOUT TO COME OUT about 2020 election fraud in Fulton County, Georgia after the FBI raid and ballot seizure

He wants Republicans to NATIONALIZE the elections, the fraud is that bad!

"Nationalize the voting! We have states so crooked, counting votes, that I won that show I didn't win. Now, you're gonna see something in Georgia...the ballots, you will see some interesting things come out!"

"2020, I won that election by so much." @dbongino

Trump: “We have states so crooked, counting votes, that I won, that show I didn't win.”

“Now, you're gonna see something in Georgia...the ballots, you will see some interesting things come out!”
RT 2min
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2018365561776775637
View: https://twitter.com/EricLDaugh/status/2018365561776775637
 
155 arty

155 arty

Veteran Member
Plain Jane said:
theconservativetreehouse.com

Senate Intelligence Committee Demand Answers About DNI Tulsi Gabbard's Ongoing Reviews of Govt Activity - The Last Refuge

Apparently, the Senate and House intelligence committees are very concerned about what Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard is doing. Almost every tweet from Senator Mark Warner in the past 48 hours has been about DNI Tulsi Gabbard. What seems to worry them the most is that they don’t...
theconservativetreehouse.com theconservativetreehouse.com

Senate Intelligence Committee Demand Answers About DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s Ongoing Reviews of Govt Activity​

January 30, 2026 | Sundance | 41 Comments
Apparently, the Senate and House intelligence committees are very concerned about what Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard is doing. Almost every tweet from Senator Mark Warner in the past 48 hours has been about DNI Tulsi Gabbard.
What seems to worry them the most is that they don’t know exactly what she is doing. Triggered by Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) Vice-Chairman Mark Warner, the Democrats are now demanding Director Gabbard tell them her intentions and her itinerary so they can monitor her activity. Tulsi Gabbard continues to review internal government activity without consulting them.




“Director Gabbard recognizes that election security is essential for the integrity of our republic and our nation’s security. As DNI, she has a vital role in identifying vulnerabilities in our critical infrastructure and protecting against exploitation,” a DNI spokesperson noted. “We know through intelligence and public reporting that electronic voting systems have been and are vulnerable to exploitation. President Trump’s directive to secure our elections was clear, and DNI Gabbard has and will continue to take actions within her authorities, alongside our interagency partners, to support ensuring the integrity of our elections,” the DNI spokesperson said.

R/T 0:51

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017360392725606500
View: https://twitter.com/ODNIgov/status/2017360392725606500?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2017360392725606500%7Ctwgr%5Ec65c808e283fc40f66f722e333ea7dc850b0df74%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftheconservativetreehouse.com%2Fblog%2F2026%2F01%2F30%2Fsenate-intelligence-committee-demand-answers-about-dni-tulsi-gabbards-ongoing-reviews-of-govt-activity%2F


Thursday evening while attending the premier of ‘Melania’ at the Kennedy Center, President Trump said, “you’re going to see some interesting things happening. They’ve been trying to get there for a long time.”

According to the Wall Street Journal:

[…] “[Tulsi Gabbard] has begun studying information about voting machines, analyzed data from swing states and pursued theories that President Trump has promoted to claim the 2020 election was unfairly taken from him, the officials said, particularly on foreign government interference.

She has regularly briefed Trump and chief of staff Susie Wiles about her inquiry in recent months along with others involved in the investigation. Those include senior Justice Department officials, Trump’s outside ally and lawyer Cleta Mitchell and Kurt Olsen, a lawyer who pushed claims in 2020 that the election was stolen and joined the administration as a special government employee.

Gabbard has consulted with others in the intelligence community about claims of foreign interference in the 2020 election, the officials said, though she hasn’t provided the public with new evidence of it.

She is expected to prepare a report on her work, the people said. The administration has discussed executive orders on voting ahead of the midterm elections, two of the officials said.

[…] Democrats criticized Gabbard’s election effort. “Either Director Gabbard believes there was a legitimate foreign intelligence nexus—in which case she is in clear violation of her obligation under the law to keep the intelligence committees ‘fully and currently informed’ of relevant national security concerns—or she is once again demonstrating her utter lack of fitness for the office,” said Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the intelligence committee. (more – paywall)

There are a lot of interconnected aspects to all of this, many circle around the Intelligence Community’s prior and current involvement in various operations against the interests of the Office of the President.

As noted by Paul Sperry: “In a letter, ex-CIA chief John Brennan’s lawyer said his client has “complied” w/ a fed grand jury subpoena seeking, among other things, materials related to his role in creation of the Obama-ordered ICA on Russia + Trump covering the period from July 1, 2016 to Feb 28, 2017.”

Most people are not aware how the 2016/2017 CIA work product known as the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) ties directly into the 2019 impeachment effort against President Trump for the Ukraine phone call with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

A key architect of the 2017 ICA was a CIA analyst on Russian issues named Eric Ciaramella. The anonymous CIA whistleblower who facilitated the 2019 impeachment effort was the same Eric Ciaramella.

DNI Tulsi Gabbard previously released information showing how the 2017 ICA was fraudulently constructed, and now DNI Gabbard has reviewed the transcribed testimony of former Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson, where he described how he gained authority to change the CIA rules to permit Ciaramella to remain anonymous in 2019. All of this ties together.

[VIA Politico] – […] Sen. Mark Warner, (D-Va.), the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, argued on X Wednesday that there “are only two explanations” for Gabbard’s presence in the raid.

“Either Director Gabbard believes there was a legitimate foreign intelligence nexus — in which case she is in clear violation of her obligation under the law to keep the intelligence committees ‘fully and currently informed’ of relevant national security concerns — or she is once again demonstrating her utter lack of fitness for the office that she holds by injecting the nonpartisan intelligence community she is supposed to be leading into a domestic political stunt designed to legitimize conspiracy theories that undermine our democracy,” he wrote.

Warner and House Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.) wrote to Gabbard Thursday to request briefings for both panels about the legal basis, scope, and justification of her participation in the raid. (more)

DNI Tulsi Gabbard continues to work on behalf of the American people; that seems to have triggered Senator Mark Warner.

The need for control is a reaction to fear.
Click to expand...
What's the problem looking in to it ,unless you are afraid of what they might find ....if they look at it and nothing happened....ok
 
Reasonable Rascal

Reasonable Rascal

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Ben Sunday said:
Did anyone happen to catch the news crawler on CNN last evening. The headline stated that Todd Blanche at DOJ "did not expect further arrests in the Epstein case"

Even worse, it was claimed that DOJ was downplaying the Georgia Elections investigation and the work by Tulsi Gabbard on that case.
Click to expand...

If it came from CNN it needs to be taken with a large grain of salt. They don't report news, they try to control the narrative.

RR
 
P

Plain Jane

Just Plain Jane
theconservativetreehouse.com

Intel Community Frame Another "Anonymous" Inspector General Complaint Against DNI Tulsi Gabbard - The Last Refuge

The Wall Street Journal is out with a very specific hit piece against Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. The article is 100% Intelligence Community insider lawfare against DNI Gabbard; however, in addition to being completely bogus the construct of the hit itself is very...
theconservativetreehouse.com theconservativetreehouse.com

Intel Community Frame Another “Anonymous” Inspector General Complaint Against DNI Tulsi Gabbard​

February 2, 2026 | Sundance | 121 Comments
The Wall Street Journal is out with a very specific hit piece against Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. The article is 100% Intelligence Community insider lawfare against DNI Gabbard; however, in addition to being completely bogus the construct of the hit itself is very revealing.

Within this current story we are going to find out why it is so important for someone, anyone to reveal how the 2019 CIA operation against President Trump was created. {GO DEEP}​

The first CIA operation (2017) involved the National Intelligence Council (NIC sub-silo) and a Russian intelligence analyst, Eric Ciaramella. That was the creation of the fraudulent Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) written from within the NIC at the direction of John Brennan. The second CIA operation was the 2019 fraudulent Trump impeachment effort, again originating from Russian analyst Eric Ciaramella (anonymous whistleblower) who was represented by legal counsel Andrew Bakaj.

The current attack against DNI Tulsi Gabbard involves her May 2025 move to take the National Intelligence Counsel out of the CIA, and remove the heads of the agency, Chairman Mike Collins (friend of Mike Morrell) and Deputy Chair Maria Langan-Riekhof. {GO DEEP}

Within the current “leak”, structurally another false narrative, the Wall Street Journal frames yet another anonymous intelligence community whistleblower complaint, this time against DNI Tulsi Gabbard. Notice: the “anonymous whistleblower” is again represented by legal counsel Andrew Bakaj. The anti-Trump intelligence officials are running the same play.

As noted by DNI Spokesperson Olivia Coleman, “This is a classic case of a politically motivated individual weaponizing their position in the Intelligence Community, submitting a baseless complaint and then burying it in highly classified information to create 1) false intrigue, 2) a manufactured narrative, and 3) conditions which make it substantially more difficult to produce “security guidance” for transmittal to Congress.”

WASHINGTON—A U.S. intelligence official has alleged wrongdoing by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard in a whistleblower complaint that is so highly classified it has sparked months of wrangling over how to share it with Congress, according to U.S. officials and others familiar with the matter.



The filing of the complaint has prompted a continuing, behind-the-scenes struggle about how to assess and handle it, with the whistleblower’s lawyer accusing Gabbard of stonewalling the complaint. Gabbard’s office rejects that characterization, contending it is navigating a unique set of circumstances and working to resolve the issue.

[…] The complaint was filed last May with the intelligence community’s inspector general, according to a November letter that the whistleblower’s lawyer addressed to Gabbard. The letter, which was viewed by The Wall Street Journal, accused Gabbard’s office of hindering the dissemination of the complaint to lawmakers by failing to provide necessary security guidance on how to do so.

[…] Gabbard answered written questions about the allegations from the inspector general’s office, a senior official at the spy agency said. That prompted the acting inspector general at the time, Tamara Johnson, to determine the allegations specifically about Gabbard weren’t credible, the official said.

[…] The complaint includes a separate allegation about “an office within a different federal agency,” upon which the watchdog’s office wasn’t able to make a credibility determination, the representative for that office said. The Wall Street Journal couldn’t determine the identity of the other federal agency. (read more)

The Wall Street Journal cannot determine the “other federal agency” provenance, but we can.

The office was the “National Intelligence Council” and the ‘other federal agency’ was/is the CIA. The background context is exactly as we previously outlined {SEE HERE}.

DNI Tulsi Gabbard has been removing the Intelligence Community tentacles used to control political policy. The Intelligence Community and the downstream stakeholders hate her.

Here’s where it becomes important to understand the full context of what DNI Gabbard did in May 2025 to infuriate the IC. The CIA was running another impeachment operation when DNI Tulsi Gabbard intercepted it.

The issue involved President Trump and Marco Rubio designating Tren de Aragua (TdA) as a terror group operating as part of the coordinated effort by Venezuela dictator Nicolas Maduro. To undermine Trump/Rubio the National Intelligence Council within the CIA created analysis that contradicted the White House claim.

CBS Margaret Brennan was prepared to frame the narrative just before Tulsi Gabbard intercepted it. Brennan saying to Rubio, “Do you accept the intelligence community’s assessment that the Venezuelan gang is not a proxy force of the Maduro government? That was the National Intelligence Council assessment.

SEC. RUBIO: “Yeah, that’s their assessment. They’re wrong. In fact, the FBI agrees with me that they are. We- we- the FBI agrees that not only is Tren de Aragua exported by the Venezuelan regime, but in fact, if you go back and see a Tren de Aragua member, all the evidence is there, and it’s growing every day, was actually contracted to murder an opposition member, I believe, in Chile a few months ago. So, one of the warnings out there by the FBI is not simply that Tren de Aragua are- are a terrorist organization, but one that has already been operationalized, to murder a- to murder a- an- an opposition member in another country.”

In early 2025 the CIA was working to kneecap the Trump administration’s moves in Venezuela. [I suspect, because the CIA funding mechanism involves money flows from the drug running that Venezuela supported.]

In essence, the NIC sub-silo within the parent CIA agency was weaponizing intelligence against President Trump in order to trigger a Lawfare attack. DNI Tulsi Gabbard intercepted the issue, removed the NIC agency from the CIA and dispatched the two heads, Mike Collins and Maria Langan-Riekhof.

That’s the sourcing for the “anonymous whistleblower” shot against DNI Gabbard in 2025, that surfaced in today’s Wall Street Journal.

Again, I will repeat…. Until the Trump administration puts full sunlight on the intelligence community operations; which includes retrieving, declassifying and sharing the sealed secret transcript of former ICIG Michael Atkinson; the various intelligence officials who are comfortable weaponizing their positions will continue trying to manipulate American politics. They are continually using the same playbook.

…START HERE!​

REFERENCE READING.​

  1. Tulsi Gabbard takes down the NIC
  2. Tulsi Gabbard takes operational control of the Presidential Daily Briefing.
  3. Rubio notes Tulsi intercepted an IC impeachment operation.
  4. Tulsi Gabbard becomes a target – June 2025
Joe Kent
@joekent16jan19
·
Follow
Like clockwork: DNI Gabbard finds 2020 election fraud, days later the WSJ publishes a cryptic hit piece from anonymous sources. This is the Russiagate/impeachment hoax playbook, ment to divert attention from the DNI’s fight for the truth. No one is buying this crap in 2026.
11:44 AM · Feb 2, 2026
14.2K
https://x.com/joekent16jan19/status/2018365033932030162?

(More tweets at the link.)
 
N

night driver

ESFP adrift in INTJ sea
Folks need to tread a tad bit lighter around Joe Kent.
The young man is a bona fide Operator with very few limits on his capabilities and activities.

People need to be careful lest they awaken in the morning with a prized horse's head next to them in bed.
 
auxman

auxman

Deus vult...
P

Plain Jane

Just Plain Jane
theconservativetreehouse.com

DNI Tulsi Gabbard Responds to Senate Intel Vice-Chair Mark Warner - The Last Refuge

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard responds to the letter from Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Vice-Chairman Mark Warner. [Warner’s original letter here] Director Gabbard: “Contrary to the blatantly false and slanderous accusations being made against me by Members of...
theconservativetreehouse.com theconservativetreehouse.com

DNI Tulsi Gabbard Responds to Senate Intel Vice-Chair Mark Warner​


February 2, 2026 | Sundance | 175 Comments
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard responds to the letter from Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Vice-Chairman Mark Warner.

[Warner’s original letter here]​

Director Gabbard: “Contrary to the blatantly false and slanderous accusations being made against me by Members of Congress and their friends in the propaganda media, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence has and will continue to take action under my statutory authorities to secure our nation and ensure the integrity of our elections. My response to Congress:”



[SOURCE]

Within the letter DNI Gabbard notes, President Trump “specifically
directed” her to be present for the execution of a search warrant in Fulton County, Georgia last week as part of the probe. Director Gabbard announced in April 2025 that ODNI was investigating electronic voting systems in order to protect election integrity.

“As I publicly stated on 10 April 2025, there is information and intelligence reporting suggesting that electronic voting systems being used in the United States have long been vulnerable to exploitation that could result in enabling determined actors to manipulate the results of the votes being cast with the intent of changing the outcome of an election,” she writes. “ODNI and the IC continue to collect and assess all available intelligence concerning this threat to ensure the security and integrity of our elections,” she
said.




1770126606820.jpeg




Director Gabbard explained that the process of assessing the intelligence “ensures that the IC’s finished intelligence products are objective, independent of political considerations, and based on all available sources.” … “I will share our intelligence assessments with Congress once they are complete,” she said.
 
Cacheman

Cacheman

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Nick Sortor

@nicksortor

BREAKING: President Trump has chosen TULSI GABBARD to oversee voter fraud and election security

There’s about to be HELL to pay by the Democrats — no wonder they’re launching endless hit pieces about her

“This is a coordinated, whole-of-government effort to ensure that our elections are fair and transparent moving forward.”

Expose it ALL

32 seconds
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2018759092521648422
View: https://twitter.com/nicksortor/status/2018759092521648422?s=20
 
Reasonable Rascal

Reasonable Rascal

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Cacheman said:
RT1:22
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019068648917217511
View: https://twitter.com/Patri0tContr0l/status/2019068648917217511?s=20
Click to expand...

Somebody is playing insider up the ladder. I really doubt Tulsi and Co. would stoop to making such a call in order to make folks nervous just to see who suddenly decided to flee to Nigeria or some such. IOW we still have deep staters inside the agencies that need to be rooted out. Perhaps the phone records can reveal something since there were two calls. Once is a wrong number, twice indicates intent.

RR
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top